Next Article in Journal
Inhibitory Effect of Prickly Ash (Zanthoxylum bungeanum) Seed Kernel Oil on Lipid Metabolism of Grass Carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) in High-Fat Diet
Previous Article in Journal
Dichichthyidae, a New Family of Deepwater Sharks (Carcharhiniformes) from the Indo–West Pacific, with Description of a New Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 14.7.1 to Measure Sustainable Fishery: The Statistical Limitations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating the Sustainability of an Eastern Mediterranean Gillnet Fishery Based on the Catches of Undersized Individuals and the Reproductive Period of Targeted Species

1
Department of Nursing, School of Health Science, Alexander Campus, International Hellenic University, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission, 9091 Tromsø, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fishes 2024, 9(4), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040122
Submission received: 8 March 2024 / Revised: 28 March 2024 / Accepted: 28 March 2024 / Published: 29 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Statistical Analysis in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture)

Abstract

:
The catch composition of a coastal gillnet fishery in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea was analyzed through a two-year experimental fishing survey. Seven fish species occurred regularly in the hauls. Surmullet, Mullus surmuletus, which is the most valuable demersal fish in Greek waters and the intended target of the gillnets in small-scale fisheries, was the most abundant and systematically caught species. Almost all surmullets were larger than their minimum conservation reference size. However, three commercially exploited species (Diplodus annularis, Pagellus acarne, and P. erythrinus) were caught systematically as undersized individuals. In addition, these three species were caught mostly as immature individuals. Moreover, the operational season of the surveyed métier overlapped completely with the reproductive period of five commercially exploited species (D. annularis, M. barbatus, M. surmuletus, Sphyraena sphyraena, and Trachurus trachurus). Improvements and the establishment of additional technical measurements should be considered for the small-scale gillnet fisheries in the studied area to attenuate their detrimental effects and achieve a better compromise between sustainable exploitation of the local multi-species fish resources and the need for an economically sustainable practice.

1. Introduction

Small-scale fisheries (SSFs) provide more than a quarter of the global marine fisheries catch and supply almost half of the landings intended for human consumption [1]. SSFs in the Mediterranean Sea are of great socioeconomic and cultural significance for both the fishing sector and coastal communities [2,3]. The importance of Greek SSFs as a source of food and income and as part of the local heritage and tradition is reflected in the size of their fleet, which is the largest in Europe, with over 13,000 vessels under 12 m operating static gear [4,5,6].
The fishing gears of SSFs are characterized by lower discard rates [7] and are considered more size- and species-selective and with less detrimental effects than the gears employed in large-scale fisheries [8,9]. However, their contribution to fisheries overexploitation and total discards should not be overlooked [10,11].
Passive (or fixed) nets (gillnets and trammel nets) are the main fishing gears used in SSFs in the Mediterranean Sea. In Greek coastal fisheries, fixed nets target a variety of demersal, benthic, and pelagic fish species, like surmullet (Mullus surmuletus), the most valuable demersal species in Greek waters [12], red mullet (M. barbatus), common sole (Solea solea), and common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus), or molluscs (e.g., common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis) and crustacea (e.g., caramote prawn, Penaeus kerathurus). The target species are mainly dictated by season, market demand, and availability [13,14]. Interactions between fishing gear and marine megafauna might also coerce fishermen into shifting their strategies. In the Mediterranean Sea, most of the assessed fish stocks (83%) are characterized as overexploited [15], while the state of non-target species stocks is often not evaluated. Moreover, the landing size composition and the potential overlap between fixed nets’ operation period and fishes’ reproductive period are still largely unknown in this region.
In that context, the present study focused on the coastal gillnet fishery targeting surmullet in the inner Thermaikos Gulf in the northern Aegean Sea, Greece, typically operating between spring and early fall. The aims were to analyze (a) the catch and size composition relative to the established minimum conservation reference sizes (MCRSs) and (b) the temporal overlap between the gear operation period and the reproductive period of commercially exploited species. The results of the present study will be useful for the management of Greek SSF resources, which largely relies on technical measures such as minimum mesh sizes, gear dimensions, fishing effort limitations, temporal and/or spatial closures, and MCRSs.

2. Materials and Methods

A two-year experimental fishing survey was conducted in the inner Thermaikos Gulf in the northern Aegean Sea, Greece (Figure 1), a shallow (<100 m), semi-enclosed basin of high productivity that constitutes a significant spawning habitat for several fish species [16]. It is also one of the two most productive fishing grounds for both large- and small-scale fisheries (24.6% of the yield nationwide) in Greece and hosts the largest commercial fishing fleet in the country [16].
The sampling surveys were carried out between March and November in 2020 and 2021 using a chartered coastal fishing vessel (8 m-long, 2.3 GT, 43 hp). The sampling effort was spread out as evenly as possible across the surveyed area throughout the study, given the circumstantial weather conditions and the presence of other fishing gear. The fishing gear had the same characteristics and was deployed in the exact same manner as local fishing practices. Thus, our findings represent the impact of gillnets on actual fishing conditions. In specific, nylon gillnets with a 36-mm mesh size were used and deployed within the 20-m isobath, aligning with the predominant mullet-fishing tactics in the area and in Beaufort Sea State 0–3. Three fleets, 300-m-long each, were deployed on every sampling survey between 06:00 and 07:00 a.m. and left to soak for ~1.5 h. Each fleet consisted of three connected net panels, with each panel measuring 100 m × 1.8 m attached to a head rope equipped with floaters and a ground rope with a lead core. Prior to redeployment, nets were visually inspected for damage upon hauling and repaired if needed. In total, 80 sampling surveys were conducted (36 in 2020 and 44 in 2021; Figure 1; Table 1) under permit from the Fisheries Department of the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece.
All fish caught were placed on ice and transported to a wet lab for further processing. Fish damaged by predation from cetaceans and other predators [17,18] that could not be identified to the taxonomic species level were not included in the analyses. The analyses focused on seven commercially exploited fish species: Diplodus annularis, M. barbatus, M. surmuletus, P. acarne, P. erythrinus, Sphyraena sphyraena, and Trachurus trachurus. Sex and reproductive stage (using a 5-point grading scale based on [19]) were determined. Total length (TL in mm), total weight (TW in g), eviscerated weight (Wev in g), and gonad weight (Wg in g) were measured, and the gonadosomatic index was estimated (GSI = Wg/Wev × 100). The length at maturity (Lmat) values used in the analyses were extracted from the current bibliography for the Mediterranean Sea (Table 2). Specifically, Lmat values for D. annularis, M. barbatus, M. surmuletus, P. acarne, and P. erythrinus were obtained from [3], who performed a literature review for many species of the SSFs in the Mediterranean Sea. Lmat values for S. sphyraena and T. trachurus were obtained from other sources (Table 2). For the latter two species, when more than one value was available in the literature, the average Lmat was calculated. If Lmat was available for both sexes, the more conservative average value was used, as in [3].
All plots and statistical analyses were performed in R [23]. For plot preparation, the R packages ggplot2 and ggridges were used. The data from the two sampling seasons were analyzed together.

3. Results

In total, 3561 fish were sampled from the seven targeted species. Surmullet was the most abundant species (accounting for 14% of the abundance and 27.2% of the biomass in the total catch, respectively) (Table 3) and was caught consistently throughout the samplings. Diplodus annularis was the second most abundant catch, representing 10.6% of the total catch, while S. sphyraena had the second highest total biomass at 12.4% (Table 3).
MCRS has been established for only six of the seven fish species included in this study (D. annularis: 120 mm, M. barbatus: 110 mm, M. surmuletus: 110 mm, P. acarne: 170 mm, P. erythrinus: 150 mm, and T. trachurus: 150 mm; [3,24]; MCRS has not been established for S. sphyraena. Three of those species were caught solely (M. barbatus) or almost exclusively (M. surmuletus, T. trachurus) at sizes above their MCRSs (Figure 2 and Figure 3). On the contrary, all P. acarne and most of D. annularis and P. erythrinus caught were smaller than their MCRSs (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
Most D. annularis, P. acarne, and P. erythrinus were caught at sizes smaller than their respective Lmat (Figure 3). On the contrary, most M. barbatus and S. sphyraena were considered sexually mature, as they were larger than their Lmat values (Figure 3). Mullus surmuletus and T. trachurus were somewhat equally distributed above and below their respective Lmat thresholds (Figure 3). Monthly TL frequency distributions were analyzed for each species, and no statistically significant differences were found.
The operational period of the surveyed métier (spring to early fall) overlapped completely with the reproductive periods of D. annularis, M. barbatus, M. surmuletus, S. sphyraena, and T. trachurus (Figure 4). Based on the temporal distribution of mean GSI values, the spawning activity of these species occurs within a three-month period, from April to June, following a pattern of succession: the maximum monthly GSI of female M. surmuletus in April, of D. annularis and T. trachurus in May, and of M. barbatus and S. sphyraena in June (Figure 4). On the contrary, all the P. acarne and P. erythrinus individuals were reproductively inactive and probably immature, as most were smaller than their respective Lmat values (cf. Figure 3).

4. Discussion

This study was focused on seven commercially exploited species (D. annularis, M. barbatus, M. surmuletus, P. acarne, P. erythrinus, S. sphyraena, and T. trachurus) of the coastal gillnet fishery in the inner Thermaikos Gulf, Aegean Sea, which is a multispecies métier that mainly targets surmullet, the most valuable demersal fish in Greek waters. Given that the main catch was M. surmuletus, the surveyed métier can be characterized as an efficient practice. Additionally, almost all the surmullets were larger than the established MCRS for the species, suggesting a sustainable exploitation of this particular fish population, despite the considerable catch of immature individuals and the overlap between the métier’s operational period and the reproductive period of the species in the surveyed area. On the other hand, this métier has detrimental effects on three other commercially exploited species (D. annularis, P. acarne, and P. erythrinus), which were caught systematically as undersized individuals, with the majority of them being immature. In addition, the biomass of actively spawning individuals of four species (D. annularis, M. barbatus, S. sphyraena, and T. trachurus) was systematically removed from the ecosystem between April and June.
In total, 48 different fish species were sampled in the present study. Similar fish species compositions (50 species) of gillnets have been previously reported in the Aegean Sea (e.g., [25]). Mullus surmuletus was systematically caught from mid-spring to mid-autumn and was the most abundant fish species in the hauls, followed by D. annularis, P. erythrinus, and M. barbatus. Surmullet was also the main fish species in the catch in terms of biomass, followed by S. sphyraena, P. erythrinus, and D. annularis. Mullus surmuletus and D. annularis have been reported as the main catch of coastal gillnet fisheries in the Aegean Sea in previous studies as well [26]. Most of the non-targeted species were caught sporadically and in very low numbers. The discards ratio was low, and there was a low prevalence and capture intensity of endangered or threatened species [27].
MCRS has been established for six of the seven species analyzed in this study: D. annularis, M. barbatus, M. surmuletus, P. acarne, P. erythrinus, and T. trachurus, while there is no such regulation for S. sphyraena. Even though most S. sphyraena individuals were larger than the Lmat for the species in the Mediterranean Sea, its systematic exploitation and its medium to high commercial value justify the establishment of an MCRS and appropriate mesh sizes for its Mediterranean stocks.
Mullus barbatus, M. surmuletus, and T. trachurus were caught (almost exclusively) at sizes above their MCRSs. Mullus barbatus and T. trachurus were fished systematically above these thresholds, probably due to the large mesh size used, which was larger than the suggested ones for their Mediterranean stocks (28.8 and 30 mm, respectively; [3]). The used mesh size was also highly selective for appropriately sized M. surmuletus, even though the suggested mesh length for the species in the Mediterranean Sea is 38.5 mm [3].
In contrast, all P. acarne, most P. erythrinus, and D. annularis were caught as undersized individuals. Diplodus annularis, despite its low commercial value, is one of the main catches of Greek SSFs, and it is usually sold mixed with other sparids. The suggested mesh size for the species is 37.8 mm for the Mediterranean Sea [3]. The 36 mm mesh gillnets used in this study resulted in sampling almost exclusively undersized fish. Based on their GSI values, a significant proportion of these fish were sexually mature. The latter result indicates that the specific population is lacking larger individuals and perhaps undergoing an adaptive shift in size/age at maturity towards smaller/younger individuals, probably due to overexploitation, making management actions imperative.
Management of the valuable resources of P. acarne and P. erythrinus in the studied area should also be considered. Both species have a medium commercial value and were systematically fished as undersized individuals. The fact that most of those fish were immature is also alarming. These results may be attributed to the mesh size used (36 mm), which is smaller than the suggested ones for the Mediterranean stocks of the two species (40.5 and 41.6 mm, respectively; [3]), the lack of large individuals in the surveyed populations, or a combination of the two.
The surveyed métier catches its main target species, M. surmuletus, mostly after the completion of its spawning activity, which peaks in mid-spring. However, the gear’s operation period overlaps with the reproductive period of four other commercially exploited species in the studied area (D. annularis, M. barbatus, S. sphyraena, and T. trachurus). A pattern of succession of the maximum GSI was observed among these species. Diplodus annularis mean GSI peaked in May, which aligns with previous results from other stocks of the species in the Aegean Sea [28]. Trachurus trachurus highest mean GSI was also observed in May, later than previously found in the central Aegean Sea (February) [29]. Mullus barbatus mean GSI peak was found in June (similar to results previously reported from Thermaikos Gulf by [30]), as it was for S. sphyraena, for which there are no previous estimations from the Aegean Sea. Inferentially, the spawning activity of these species occurred right in the middle of the gillnet operation period. The latter result raises concerns regarding the degree of spawning success for these stocks. Unsuccessful or limited spawning—in terms of the number of spawners or number of spawning events per fish—may hamper the replenishment of the removed biomass from the local SSFs through juvenile recruitment to the adult population.
Implementation of additional technical measurements might need to be considered during May–June to ensure the sustainability of both the commercially valuable species and the discards, which are also critical in sustaining a balanced ecosystem. Certainly, Lmat values need to be estimated for the commercially exploited species, especially for D. annularis, P. acarne, and P. erythrinus in Thermaikos Gulf, and—if necessary—the current MCRSs might need to be readjusted, as size at maturity is the basis for setting the MCRSs in fisheries management.

5. Conclusions

Gillnets employed in SSFs, like any other fishing gear, are not selective for any given species or size range [31,32]. In the Thermaikos Gulf, gillnets: (i) fail to spare undesired species with no commercial value in the Greek market, but with a low discard ratio and prevalence/capture intensity of endangered or threatened species [27], (ii) they catch undersized individuals of species whose management is under regulation, and (iii) their operation period overlaps with the GSI peak of several exploited species. On the contrary, the surveyed métier catches its main target species, M. surmuletus, almost exclusively above the established MCRS and after the peak of its spawning activity, rendering its exploitation sustainable. In parallel, M. surmuletus remains the primary catch of gillnet SSF in the studied area, which ensures the economic sustainability of the sector.
Technical measures, such as MCRS and mesh size, often aim to achieve a compromise between a sustainable exploitation of the multi-species fish resources exploited by SSFs and the need to maintain the economic sustainability of the sector. Compromises are not always ideal, resulting in incidental catches of undesired, undersized individuals or mature fish during their reproductive period. In any case, technical measures are justifiable, and they provide the framework for fisheries management and a basis that can and should constantly be evaluated and revised if needed. Such improvements and the possible establishment of additional technical measures should be considered for the gillnet SSF in Thermaikos Gulf, which in general is a highly efficient métier.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.A.M., G.M. and K.G.; Formal analysis, F.A.M.; Funding acquisition, G.M. and K.G.; Methodology, F.A.M. and M.G.; Supervision, G.M. and K.G.; Visualization, F.A.M. and M.G.; Writing—original draft, F.A.M.; Writing—review and editing, F.A.M., M.G., G.M. and K.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was conducted within the framework of the CETA-NET project “Use of coated nets to avoid cetaceans in coastal fisheries” supported by the Greek Operational Programme for Fisheries and Sea (2014–2020), under the “Innovation for Fisheries” call [Monitoring Information System code: 5030544].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study is approved by the Fisheries Department of the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Approval code: 221937(1417); Date: 21 April 2021.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Theofanis Karydas for providing his vessel, Georgia Avgerinou and Katerina Zafeiriadou for their assistance in the lab, and the Fisheries Department of the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece, for granting the license for the sampling surveys.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Morales-Nin, B.; Grau, A.M.; Palmer, M. Managing coastal zone fisheries: A Mediterranean case study. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2010, 53, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lucchetti, A.; Virgili, M.; Petetta, A.; Sartor, P. An overview of gill net and trammel net size selectivity in the Mediterranean Sea. Fish. Res. 2020, 230, 105677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Greek Fishing Fleet. 2020 Annual Report; Directorate General for Fisheries of the Ministry of Rural Development and Food: Athens, Greece, 2021; Available online: https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/2020-fleet-capacity-report-greece_en.pdf (accessed on 3 May 2022).
  5. Liontakis, A.; Tzouramani, I.; Mantziaris, S.; Sintori, A. Unravelling the role of gender in fisheries’ socio-economic performance: The case of Greek small-scale fisheries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tzanatos, E.; Georgiadis, M.; Peristeraki, P. Small-scale fisheries in Greece: Status, problems, and management. In Small-Scale Fisheries in Europe: Status, Resilience and Governance; Pascual-Fernández, J.J., Pita, C., Bavinck, M., Eds.; MARE Publication Series 23; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 125–150. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kelleher, K. Discards in the world’s marine fisheries. An update. In Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper, 470th ed.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huse, I.; Løkkeborg, S.; Soldal, A.V. Relative selectivity in trawl, longline and gillnet fisheries for cod and haddock. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2000, 57, 1271–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stergiou, K.I.; Moutopoulos, D.K.; Erzini, K. Gill net and longlines fisheries in Cyclades waters (Aegean Sea): Species composition and gear competition. Fish. Res. 2002, 57, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bellido, J.M.; Santos, M.B.; Pennino, M.G.; Valeiras, X.; Pierce, G.J. Fishery discards and bycatch: Solutions for an ecosystem approach to fisheries management? Hydrobiologia 2011, 670, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sartor, P.; Li Veli, D.; De Carlo, F.; Ligas, A.; Massaro, A.; Musumeci, C.; Sartini, M.; Rossetti, I.; Sbrana, M.; Viva, C. Reducing unwanted catches of trammel nets: Experimental results of the “guarding net” in the caramote prawn, Penaeus kerathurus, small-scale fishery of the Ligurian Sea (western Mediterranean). Sci. Mar. 2018, 82 (Suppl. S1), 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Petrakis, G.; Stergiou, K.I. Gill net selectivity for Diplodus annularis and Mullus surmuletus in Greek waters. Fish. Res. 1995, 21, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maynou, F.; Recasens, L.; Lombarte, A. Fishing tactics dynamics of a Mediterranean small-scale coastal fishery. Aquat. Living Resour. 2011, 24, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Palmer, M.; Tolosa, B.; Grau, A.M.; Gil, M.M.; Obregón, C.; Morales-Nin, B. Combining sale records of landings and fishers knowledge for predicting metiers in a small-scale, multi-gear, multispecies fishery. Fish. Res. 2017, 195, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Froese, R.; Winker, H.; Coro, G.; Demirel, N.; Tsikliras, A.C.; Dimarchopoulou, D.; Scarcella, G.; Quaas, M.; Matz-Lück, N. Status and rebuilding of European fisheries. Mar. Policy 2018, 93, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hellenic Statistical Authority. Sea Fishery Survey by Motor-Propelled Vessels: 2021; Press Release; Hellenic Statistical Authority: Athens, Greece, 2022; 8p. [Google Scholar]
  17. Garagouni, M.; Avgerinou, G.; Minos, G.; Ganias, K. Dolphins don’t mind hot sauce: Testing the effect of gillnet coating on depredation rates. Mar. Mammal Sci. 2022, 38, 1691–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garagouni, M.; Avgerinou, G.; Mouchlianitis, F.; Minos, G.; Ganias, K. Questionnaire and experimental surveys show that dolphins cause substantial losses to a gillnet fishery in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2022, 79, 2552–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brown-Peterson, N.J.; Wyanski, D.M.; Saborido-Rey, F.; Macewicz, B.J.; Lowerre-Barbieri, S.K. A standardized terminology for describing reproductive development in fishes. Mar. Coast. Fish. 2011, 3, 52–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wadie, W.; Riskalla, S.; Dowidar, N. Maturity of family Sphyraenidae in the southeastern Mediterranean Sea. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer. Médit. 1988, 31, 269. [Google Scholar]
  21. Villegas-Hernández, H.; Muñoz, M.; Lloret, J. Life-history traits of temperature and thermophilic barracudas (Teleostei: Sphyraenidae) in the context of sea warming in the Mediterranean Sea. J. Fish Biol. 2014, 84, 1940–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tsikliras, A.C.; Stergiou, K.I. Size at maturity of Mediterranean marine fishes. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher. 2014, 24, 219–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2022; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
  24. European Union. 32019R1241–EN–EUR-Lex. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2019, 198, 105–201. Available online: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1241/oj (accessed on 3 May 2022).
  25. Petrakis, G.; Stergiou, K.I. Gill net selectivity for four fish species (Mullus barbatus, Pagellus erythrinus, Pagellus acarne and Spicara flexuosum) in Greek waters. Fish. Res. 1996, 27, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Petrakis, G.; Stergiou, K.I.; Christou, E.; Politou, C.-Y.; Karkani, M.; Simboura, N.; Kouyoufas, P. Small Scale Fishery in the South Euboikos Gulf; Technical Report (Contract XIV-l/MED-91/007); National Centre for Marine Research: Athens, Greece, 1993; 83p. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ganias, K.; Zafeiriadou, A.; Garagouni, M.; Antoniadou, C. High bycatch rate of the coral Cladocora caespitosa offsets the low discards ratio in Thermaikos Gulf gillnet fishery. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2023, 24, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stappa, P. Biology of Annular Seabream (Diplodus annularis) at Patraikos Gulf and the Adjusted Area. Master’s Thesis, University of Patras, Patras, Greece, 2020. (In Greek). [Google Scholar]
  29. Karlou-Riga, C.; Economidis, P.S. Ovarian atretic rates and sexual maturity of horse mackerel, Trachurus trachurus (L.) in the Saronikos Gulf (Greece). Fish. B-NOAA 1996, 94, 66–76. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kokokiris, L.; Stamoulis, A.; Monokrousos, N.; Doulgeraki, S. Oocytes development, maturity classification, maturity size and spawning season of the red mullet (Mullus barbatus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2014, 30, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tsagarakis, K.; Palialexis, A.; Vassilopoulou, V. Mediterranean fishery discards: Review of the existing knowledge. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2014, 71, 1219–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tzanatos, E.; Somarakis, S.; Tserpes, G.; Koutsikopoulos, C. Discarding practices in a Mediterranean small-scale fishing fleet (Patraikos Gulf, Greece). Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2007, 14, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling area with insets showing Greece and the inner Thermaikos Gulf (outlined in red). Dashed outline in the smallest inset indicates the surveyed area. Gillnets were deployed within the 20-m isobath.
Figure 1. Sampling area with insets showing Greece and the inner Thermaikos Gulf (outlined in red). Dashed outline in the smallest inset indicates the surveyed area. Gillnets were deployed within the 20-m isobath.
Fishes 09 00122 g001
Figure 2. Percentage of fish caught below and above the minimum conservation reference size (MCRS) for the fish species included in this study with such thresholds in European legislation.
Figure 2. Percentage of fish caught below and above the minimum conservation reference size (MCRS) for the fish species included in this study with such thresholds in European legislation.
Fishes 09 00122 g002
Figure 3. Total length (TL) frequency distributions per species. Vertical lines and vertical dashed lines correspond to the length at maturity (cf. Table 2) and the minimum conservation reference size (MCRS) per species, respectively. Note: MCRS has not been established for Sphyraena sphyraena.
Figure 3. Total length (TL) frequency distributions per species. Vertical lines and vertical dashed lines correspond to the length at maturity (cf. Table 2) and the minimum conservation reference size (MCRS) per species, respectively. Note: MCRS has not been established for Sphyraena sphyraena.
Fishes 09 00122 g003
Figure 4. Monthly mean gonadosomatic index (GSI) values per species. Note: the scale is the same on all y axes; females and males were analyzed together.
Figure 4. Monthly mean gonadosomatic index (GSI) values per species. Note: the scale is the same on all y axes; females and males were analyzed together.
Fishes 09 00122 g004
Table 1. Number of sampling surveys and of fish belonging to the seven studied species (Diplodus annularis, Mullus barbatus, M. surmuletus, Pagellus acarne, P. erythrinus, Sphyraena sphyraena, and Trachurus trachurus) caught per year.
Table 1. Number of sampling surveys and of fish belonging to the seven studied species (Diplodus annularis, Mullus barbatus, M. surmuletus, Pagellus acarne, P. erythrinus, Sphyraena sphyraena, and Trachurus trachurus) caught per year.
20202021
Sampling SurveysFish SamplesSampling SurveysFish Samples
March174
April3240122
May63107285
June21688325
July3609222
August82198301
September83056313
October42865382
November149
Total361711441850
Table 2. Length at maturity (Lmat) values per species used in the analyses.
Table 2. Length at maturity (Lmat) values per species used in the analyses.
SpeciesLmat (mm)Reference
Diplodus annularis105[3] and references within
Mullus barbatus128[3] and references within
Mullus surmuletus155[3] and references within
Pagellus acarne142[3] and references within
Pagellus erythrinus140[3] and references within
Sphyraena sphyraena251[20,21]
Trachurus trachurus188References in [22]
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of abundance and total biomass (in kg). n = number of fish; %RF = relative abundance.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of abundance and total biomass (in kg). n = number of fish; %RF = relative abundance.
Speciesn%RFTL Min–Max (Mean)Total Biomass%Total Biomass
Diplodus annularis86210.673–156 (102.3)15.38
Mullus barbatus3153.9115–213 (147.7)11.96.2
Mullus surmuletus11371494–231 (153.5)52.127.2
Pagellus acarne1992.487–159 (134.5)6.13.2
Pagellus erythrinus6207.678–229 (129.6)18.29.5
Sphyraena sphyraena2052.5177–400 (307.1)23.812.4
Trachurus trachurus2232.7138–244 (184.8)11.56
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mouchlianitis, F.A.; Garagouni, M.; Minos, G.; Ganias, K. Evaluating the Sustainability of an Eastern Mediterranean Gillnet Fishery Based on the Catches of Undersized Individuals and the Reproductive Period of Targeted Species. Fishes 2024, 9, 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040122

AMA Style

Mouchlianitis FA, Garagouni M, Minos G, Ganias K. Evaluating the Sustainability of an Eastern Mediterranean Gillnet Fishery Based on the Catches of Undersized Individuals and the Reproductive Period of Targeted Species. Fishes. 2024; 9(4):122. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040122

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mouchlianitis, Foivos A., Maria Garagouni, George Minos, and Kostas Ganias. 2024. "Evaluating the Sustainability of an Eastern Mediterranean Gillnet Fishery Based on the Catches of Undersized Individuals and the Reproductive Period of Targeted Species" Fishes 9, no. 4: 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes9040122

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop