Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Mathematical Model for SARS-CoV-2 in Caputo Derivative
Previous Article in Journal
Hermite–Jensen–Mercer-Type Inequalities via Caputo–Fabrizio Fractional Integral for h-Convex Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nonlocal Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Fractional (p,q)-Difference Equations

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Applied Science, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, Bangkok 10800, Thailand
3
Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece
4
Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics (NAAM)-Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Fractal Fract. 2021, 5(4), 270; https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040270
Submission received: 8 November 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 7 December 2021 / Published: 10 December 2021

Abstract

:
In this paper, we study nonlinear fractional ( p , q ) -difference equations equipped with separated nonlocal boundary conditions. The existence of solutions for the given problem is proven by applying Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem and the Leray–Schauder alternative. In contrast, the uniqueness of the solutions is established by employing Banach’s contraction mapping principle. Examples illustrating the main results are also presented.

1. Introduction

In recent years, fractional differential equations have been considered a popular field of research and have attracted many researchers’ attention. This is mainly because fractional differential equations are found to be effective and more practical than classical differential equations, particularly in the mathematical modeling of dynamical systems, such as fractals and chaos. In the last two decades, the fractional differential equations have developed from theoretical aspects of the existence and uniqueness of solutions to analytic and numerical methods for finding solutions, which can be found in [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Moreover, in modern mathematical analysis, fractional differential equations have a range of applications, such as engineering and clinical disciplines, including biology, physics, chemistry, economics, signal and image processing, and control theory; see [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] for more details.
In 1910, F. H. Jackson initiated a study of the q-difference calculus or quantum calculus (briefly called q-calculus) in a symmetrical manner and introduced the q-derivative and q-integral, which can be found in [18,19]. With these results, q-calculus has arisen in a range of applications, such as combinatorics, orthogonal polynomials, basic hypergeometric functions, number theory, quantum theory, mechanics, and theory of relativity; see [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40] and the references cited therein. The book by V. Kac and P. Cheung [41] covers the basic theoretical concepts of q-calculus.
Because the exploration has been continued by generalizing the existing results through creative discussions and novel techniques of fractional calculus, fractional q-difference calculus has been introduced by W.A. Al-Salam [42] and R.P. Agarwal [43]. Furthermore, fractional q-difference equations have attracted the attention of researchers; for instance, B. Ahmad et al. [44] investigated the existence results of nonlocal boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional q-difference equations:
c D q α x ( t ) = f ( t , x ( t ) ) , t [ 0 , 1 ] , 1 < α 2 , α 1 x ( 0 ) + β 1 D q x ( 0 ) = γ 1 x ( η 1 ) , α 2 x ( 1 ) + β 2 D q x ( 1 ) = γ 2 x ( η 2 ) ,
where f C [ 0 , 1 ] × R , R and α i , β i , γ i , η i ( i = 1 , 2 ) are constants with η i ( 0 , 1 ) , c D q α and D q are the fractional q-derivative of the Caputo type and the first-order q-difference operator, respectively. For more early and recent works on the existence theory of fractional q-difference equations, we refer to [45,46,47,48].
Later on, the subject of ( p , q ) -calculus was generalized and developed from the q-calculus theory into the two-parameter ( p , q ) -integer, which is used effectively in many fields, and some results on the study of ( p , q ) -calculus can be found in [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74].
Inspired and motivated by some of the above applications, in 2018, N. Kamsrisuk et al. [75] considered the existence and uniqueness of solutions for the first-order quantum ( p , q ) -difference equation subject to a nonlocal condition:
D p , q x ( t ) = f ( t , x ( p t ) ) , t 0 , T / p , x ( 0 ) = α i x T + i = 0 m β i 0 η i x ( s ) d p i , q i s ,
where 0 < q < p 1 , 0 < q i < p i 1 ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 , , m ) are quantum numbers, f C [ 0 , T / p ] × R , R , T > 0 , D p , q is the ( p , q ) -difference operator, and α i , β i , η i ( i = 1 , 2 , m ) are constants.
Furthermore, C. Promsakon et al. [76] introduced the second-order ( p , q ) -difference equations with separated boundary conditions:
D p , q 2 x ( t ) = f t , x ( p 2 t ) , t [ 0 , T / p 2 ] , α 1 x ( 0 ) + α 2 D p , q x ( 0 ) = α 3 , β 1 x ( T ) + β 2 D p , q x ( T / p ) = β 3 ,
where f C [ 0 , T / p 2 ] × R , R and α i , β i ( i = 1 , 2 , 3 ) are constants. D p , q 2 and D q are the second and first order of the ( p , q ) -difference operator, respectively.
However, the study of nonlocal boundary value problems of fractional ( p , q ) -difference equations is at its infancy, and much of the work on the topic is yet to be done.
In this paper, we study the existence and uniqueness of solutions of the nonlocal boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional ( p , q ) -difference equations given by
c D p , q α y ( t ) = h t , y ( p α t ) , t [ 0 , T / p α ] , 1 < α 2 , β 1 y ( 0 ) + γ 1 D p , q y ( 0 ) = ζ 1 y ( η 1 ) , β 2 y ( T ) + γ 2 D p , q y ( T / p ) = ζ 2 y ( η 2 ) ,
where h C [ 0 , T / p α ] × R , R and β i , γ i , η i ( i = 1 , 2 ) are constants; c D p , q α and D p , q are the fractional ( p , q ) -derivative of the Caputo type and the first-order ( p , q ) -difference operator, respectively.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we give some definitions and fundamental results of the q-calculus and ( p , q ) -calculus along with the fractional ( p , q ) -calculus, which can be found in [27,28,56,58]. We also give a lemma that will be used in obtaining the main results of the paper.
Throughout this paper, let [ a , b ] R be an interval with a < b , and 0 < q < p 1 be constants,
[ k ] p , q = p k q k p q , k N ,
[ k ] p , q ! = [ k ] p , q [ k 1 ] p , q [ 1 ] p , q = i = 1 k p i q i p q , k N , 1 , k = 0 .
The q-analogue of the power function ( a b ) q ( n ) with n N 0 : = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } is given by
( a b ) q ( 0 ) = 1 , ( a b ) q ( n ) : = k = 0 n 1 ( a b q k ) , a , b R .
The ( p , q ) -analogue of the power function ( a b ) p , q ( n ) with n N 0 : = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } is given by
( a b ) p , q ( 0 ) = 1 , ( a b ) p , q ( n ) : = k = 0 n 1 ( a p k b q k ) , a , b R .
For t R \ { 0 , 1 , 2 , } , the ( p , q ) -gamma function is defined by
Γ p , q ( t ) = p q p , q ( t 1 ) ( p q ) t 1 ,
and an equivalent definition of (7) is given in [59] as
Γ p , q ( t ) = p t ( t 1 ) 2 0 x t 1 E p , q q x d p , q x ,
where
E p , q q x = n = 0 q n 2 [ n ] p , q ! q x n .
Obviously, Γ p , q ( t + 1 ) = [ t ] p , q Γ p , q ( t ) .
For s , t > 0 , the definition of the ( p , q ) -beta function is
B p , q ( s , t ) = 0 1 u s 1 1 q u p , q ( t 1 ) d p , q u ,
and (9) can also be written as
B p , q ( s , t ) = p t 1 2 s + t 2 / 2 Γ p , q ( s ) Γ p , q ( t ) Γ p , q ( s + t ) ,
see [77,78] for more details.
Definition 1.
([56]). If f : [ 0 , T ] R is a continuous function, then the ( p , q ) -derivative of f is defined by
D p , q f ( t ) = f ( p t ) f ( q t ) ( p q ) t , t 0
and D p , q f ( 0 ) = lim t 0 D p , q f ( t ) . Observe that the function D p , q f ( t ) is defined on [ 0 , T / p ] provided that D p , q f ( t ) exists for all t [ 0 , T / p ] .
Definition 2.
([56]). If f : [ 0 , T ] R is a continuous function, then the ( p , q ) -integral of f is defined as
0 t f ( s ) d p , q s = ( p q ) t n = 0 q n p n + 1 f q n p n + 1 t
provided that the right-hand side converges. Note that the function 0 t f ( s ) d p , q s is defined on [ 0 , p T ] , which is extended from [ 0 , T ] of a function f ( t ) .
Theorem 1.
([56]). Let f , g : [ 0 , T ] R , g ( t ) 0 for all t [ 0 , T ] , be ( p , q ) -differentiable on [ 0 , T / p ] and λ be a constant. Then,
(i) 
D p , q f ( t ) + g ( t ) = D p , q f ( t ) + D p , q g ( t ) ;
(ii) 
D p , q λ f ( s ) = λ D p , q f ( s ) ;
(iii) 
D p , q f g ( t ) = f ( p t ) D p , q g ( t ) + g ( q t ) D p , q f ( t ) ;
(iv) 
D p , q f / g ( t ) = g ( q t ) D p , q f ( t ) f ( q t ) D p , q g ( t ) g ( p t ) g ( q t ) .
Theorem 2.
([79]). Let f : [ 0 , T ] R be a continuous function. The following formulas hold for t [ a , b ] :
(i) 
D p , q 0 t f ( s ) d p , q s = f ( t ) ;
(ii) 
0 t D p , q f ( s ) d p , q s = f ( t ) f ( 0 ) ;
(iii) 
c t D p , q f ( s ) d p , q s = f ( t ) f ( c ) , for c ( 0 , t ) .
Definition 3.
([77]). Let f : [ 0 , T ] R be a continuous function and α 0 . The fractional ( p , q ) -integral of fractional Riemann–Liouville type is given by I p , q 0 f t = f t and
I p , q α f ( t ) = 1 p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) f s p α 1 d p , q s = ( p q ) t p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) n = 0 q n p n + 1 t q n + 1 p n + 1 t p , q ( α 1 ) f q n p α + n t ,
where t [ 0 , p α T ] .
Definition 4.
([77]). The fractional ( p , q ) -derivative of Riemann-Liouville type of order α 0 of a continuous function f is defined by ( D p , q 0 f ) ( t ) = f ( t ) and
( D p , q α f ) ( t ) = D p , q [ α ] I p , q [ α ] α f ( t ) ,
where [ α ] is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.
Definition 5.
([77]). The fractional ( p , q ) -derivative of Caputo type of order α 0 of a continuous function f is defined by c D p , q 0 f ( t ) = f ( t ) and
( c D p , q α f ) ( t ) = I p , q [ α ] α D p , q [ α ] f ( t ) ,
where [ α ] is the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.
Lemma 1.
([77]). Let f be a continuous function and α , β 0 . Then, the following formulas hold:
(i) 
I p , q β I p , q α f ( t ) = I p , q α + β f ( t ) ,
(ii) 
D p , q α I p , q α f ( t ) = f ( t ) .
Lemma 2.
([77]). Let f be a continuous function, α 0 , and n N . Then, the following equality holds:
I p , q α D p , q n f ( t ) = D p , q n I p , q α f ( t ) k = 0 [ α ] 1 t α n + k p α 2 Γ p , q ( α n + k + 1 ) D p , q k f ( 0 ) .
Lemma 3.
([77]). Let f be a continuous function and α 0 . Then, the following equality holds:
I p , q α c D p , q α f ( t ) = f ( t ) k = 0 [ α ] 1 t k p α 2 Γ p , q ( k + 1 ) D p , q k f ( 0 ) .
In order to define the solution of the boundary value problem (4), we need the following lemma.
Lemma 4.
Let α i , β i , γ i ( i = 1 , 2 ) be constants and c D p , q α and D p , q be the fractional ( p , q ) -derivative of the Caputo type and the first-order ( p , q ) -difference operator, respectively. For a given h C [ 0 , T / p α ] , R , a unique solution of the boundary value problem
c D p , q α y ( t ) = h ( t ) , t [ 0 , T / p α ] , β 1 y ( 0 ) + γ 1 D p , q y ( 0 ) = ζ 1 y ( η 1 ) , β 2 y ( T ) + γ 2 D p , q y ( T / p ) = ζ 2 y ( η 2 )
is given by
y ( t ) = 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 1 Δ ( β 2 ζ 2 ) t ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 2 Δ ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + β 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + γ 2 Δ ( γ 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s p α 2 d p , q s ,
where
Δ = ( β 2 γ 2 ) ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 2 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 .
Proof. 
By taking the fractional ( p , q ) -integral on (16) and applying Lemma 3, we have
y ( t ) = 0 t ( t q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + t c 0 + c 1 ,
where c 0 , c 1 are constants and t [ 0 , T ] .
Applying the above boundary condition of (16), we obtain
( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) c 1 + ( β 1 ζ 1 ) c 2 = ζ 1 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s , ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) c 1 + ( β 2 ζ 2 ) c 2 = ζ 2 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s p α 1 d p , q s β 2 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s γ 2 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s p α 2 d p , q s .
Solving the above system of (19) to find the constants c 1 , c 2 , we have
c 1 = 1 Δ ζ 1 ( β 2 ζ 2 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s ζ 2 ( β 1 ζ 1 ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + β 2 ( β 1 ζ 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + γ 2 ( β 1 ζ 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 2 d p , q s ,
and
c 2 = 1 Δ ζ 1 ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 2 ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s p α 1 d p , q s β 1 β 2 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s p α 2 d p , q s .
Substituting the values of c 0 , c 1 in (18), we obtain (17). We can prove the converse by direct computation. Therefore, the proof is completed. □

3. Main Results

In view of Lemma 4, we define an operator Ψ : C [ 0 , T ] , R C [ 0 , T ] , R as
Ψ y ( t ) = 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 1 Δ ( β 2 ζ 2 ) t ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 2 Δ ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + β 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s
+ γ 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α 2 s ) ) d p , q s ,
where
Δ = ( β 2 ζ 2 ) ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 2 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 .
Let Ω : = C [ 0 , T ] , R denote the Banach space of all continuous functions from [ 0 , T ] to R endowed with norm defined by y = max { | y ( t ) | : t [ 0 , T ] } .
Observe that the boundary value problem (4) has a unique solution if the operator equation Ψ y = y has a fixed point, where Ψ is given in (20). For convenience, we let
k = I p , q α λ ( T ) + | ζ 1 | σ 1 ( T ) I p , q α λ ( η 1 ) + | ζ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) I p , q α λ ( η 2 ) + | β 2 | σ 2 ( T ) I p , q α λ ( T ) + | γ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) I p , q α 1 λ ( T / p ) ,
where
σ 1 ( T ) = β 2 ζ 2 T + β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 Δ
and
σ 2 ( T ) = β 1 ζ 1 T + γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 Δ .
Theorem 3.
Let h : [ 0 , T / p α ] × R R be a continuous function and note that there exists a ( p , q ) -integrable function λ : [ 0 , T / p α ] R such that
( A 1 )
h ( t , y ) h ( t , z ) λ ( t ) y z , for each t [ 0 , T / p α ] and y , z R .
If
k < 1 ,
where k is given by (21), then the boundary value problem (4) has a unique solution.
Proof. 
Let us fix sup t [ 0 , T / p α ] | h ( t , 0 ) | = M and choose
r M A 1 k ,
where
A = T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + β 2 σ 2 ( T ) T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) T α 1 Γ p , q ( α ) + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) η 1 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) η 2 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) .
We define B r = { y C : y r } and we shall show that Ψ B r B r , where Ψ is defined (20). For any y B r , observe that
h ( t , y ( t ) ) h ( t , y ( t ) ) h ( t , 0 ) + h ( t , 0 ) λ ( t ) r + M
and
( Ψ y ) ( t ) 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) | h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) | d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) | h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) | d p , q s
+ ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) | h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) | d p , q s + β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) | h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) | d p , q s + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) | h ( s , y ( p α 2 s ) ) | d p , q s 0 T T q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) | λ s p α 1 r + M | d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) | λ s p α 1 r + M | d p , q s + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) | λ s p α 1 r + M | d p , q s + β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) | λ s p α 2 r + M | d p , q s + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) | λ s p α 2 r + M | d p , q s M T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + β 2 σ 1 ( T ) T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) T α 1 Γ p , q ( α ) + ζ 1 σ 2 ( T ) η 1 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) η 1 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + r 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) λ s p α 2 d p , q s ,
which, in view of (21) and (23), implies that
Ψ y M A + r k r .
This implies that Ψ y B r .
Now, for y , z C , we obtain
Ψ y Ψ z sup t [ 0 , T / p α ] 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) h ( s , z ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 η 1 q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) h ( s , z ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 η 2 q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) h ( s , z ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T T q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) h ( s , z ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p T / p q s p , q ( α 2 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) h ( s , z ( p α s ) ) d p , q s y z 0 T T q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 η 1 q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 η 2 q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + σ 1 ( T ) β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T T q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + σ 2 ( T ) γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p T / p q s p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) λ s p α 2 d p , q s ,
from which, in view of (21), we obtain
Ψ y Ψ z k y z .
Because k ( 0 , 1 ) by assumptions (22), therefore, Ψ is a contraction. Thus, it follows by Banach’s contraction principle that the boundary value problem (4) has a unique solution. □
In case λ ( t ) = λ , where λ is a constant, the condition (22) becomes λ A < 1 and Theorem 3 takes the form of the following results.
Remark 1.
If h : [ 0 , T / p α ] × R R is a contraction function and there exists a constant λ > 0 with
h ( t , y ) h ( t , z ) λ y z ,
for each t [ 0 , T / p α ] and y , z R , then the boundary value problem (4) has a unique solution, provided that k < 1 .
Our next existence results are based on Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem.
Lemma 5.
([80]). (Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem) Let M be a closed, bounded, convex, and non-empty subset of a Banach space X. Let A , B be two operators such that:
(i) 
A y + B z M , whenever y , z M ;
(ii) 
A is compact and continuous;
(iii) 
B is a contraction mapping.
Then, there exists x M such that x = A x + B x .
Theorem 4.
Let h : [ 0 , T / p α ] × R R be a continuous function satisfying ( A 1 ) . In addition, we assume that
( A 2 )
there exists a function μ C [ 0 , T / p α ] , R + and a non-decreasing function ϕ C ( [ 0 , T / p α ] , R + ) with
h ( t , y ) μ ( t ) ϕ | y | ,
where t , y [ 0 , T / p α ] × R .
If
0 T T q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 η 1 q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 η 2 q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + σ 1 ( T ) β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T T q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) λ s p α 1 d p , q s + σ 2 ( T ) γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p T / p q s p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) λ s p α 2 d p , q s < 1 ,
then the boundary value problem (4) has at least one solution on [ 0 , T ] .
Proof. 
Let B r ¯ : = y C : y r ¯ , where
r ¯ ϕ ( r ¯ ) μ T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + β 2 σ 1 ( T ) T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) T α 1 Γ p , q ( α ) + ζ 1 σ 2 ( T ) η 1 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) η 1 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) ,
where μ = sup [ 0 , T / p α ] μ ( t ) and define the operators P and Q on B r ¯ as
P y ( t ) = 0 t ( t q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s
and
Q y ( t ) = ζ 1 Δ ( β 2 ζ 2 ) t ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 2 Δ ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + β 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + γ 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α 2 s ) ) d p , q s ,
where
Δ = ( β 2 ζ 2 ) ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 2 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 .
For y , z B r ¯ , we have
P y + Q z ( t ) 0 t ( t q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 1 Δ ( β 2 ζ 2 ) t ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , z ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 2 Δ ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , z ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + β 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , z ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + γ 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , z ( p α 2 s ) ) d p , q s 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) μ ( t ) ϕ | y | d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) μ ( t ) ϕ | z | d p , q s + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) μ ( t ) ϕ | z | d p , q s + β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) μ ( t ) ϕ | z | d p , q s + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) μ ( t ) ϕ | z | d p , q s ϕ ( r ¯ ) μ T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + β 2 σ 1 ( T ) T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) T α 1 Γ p , q ( α ) + ζ 1 σ 2 ( T ) η 1 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) η 1 α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) r ¯ .
Thus, P y + Q z B r ¯ . From ( A 1 ) and (26), it follows that Q is a contraction mapping. By continuity of h, we obtain that the operator P is continuous. It is not difficult to verify that
P ϕ ( r ¯ ) μ T α Γ p , q ( α + 1 ) .
Therefore, the set P ( B r ¯ ) is uniformly bounded. Next, we shall prove the compactness of the operator P . Now, for any y B r ¯ t 1 , t 2 [ 0 , T ] with t 1 < t 2 . Then, we obtain
P y ( t 2 ) Q y ( t 1 ) = 0 t 2 ( t q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) f ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s 0 t 1 ( t q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) f ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s 0 t 1 ( t 2 q s ) ( α 1 ) ( t 1 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) f ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + t 1 t 2 ( t 2 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) f ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s ϕ ( r ¯ ) μ 0 t 1 ( t 2 q s ) ( α 1 ) ( t 1 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) f ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + t 1 t 2 ( t 2 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) f ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s .
which is independent of x and tends to zero as t 1 t 2 . Thus, the set P B r ¯ is equicontinuous. By the Arzelá–Ascoli theorem, P is compact on B r ¯ . Therefore, the boundary value problem (4) has at least one solution on [ 0 , T ] . This completes the proof. □
Remark 2.
Let h : [ 0 , T / p α ] × R R be a continuous function satisfying ( A 1 ) . In addition, we assume that
h ( t , y ) μ ( t ) , ( t , y ) [ 0 , T / p α ] × R and μ C [ 0 , T / p α ] , R + .
If (26 ) holds, then the boundary value problem (4) has at least one solution on [ 0 , T ] .
The next existence results are based on the Leray–Schauder nonlinear alternative.
Lemma 6.
([81]). (Nonlinear alternative for single value maps) Let E be a Banach space, C a closed, convex subset of E, and U an open subset of C with 0 U . Suppose that Ψ : U ¯ C is a continuous, compact function; that is, Ψ U ¯ is a relatively compact subset of C map. Then, either
(i) 
Ψ has a fixed point in U ¯ , or
(ii) 
there is a u U (the boundary of U in C ) and λ ( 0 , 1 ) with u = λ Ψ ( u ) .
Theorem 5.
Let h : [ 0 , T / p α ] × R R be a continuous function. Assume that:
( A 3 )
there exist functions p 1 , p 2 C [ 0 , T / p α ] , R + , and a non-decreasing function ψ : R + R + such that
h ( t , y ) p 1 ( t ) ψ ( | y | ) + p 2 ( t ) , t , y [ 0 , T / p α ] × R ;
( A 4 )
there exists a number M > 0 such that
M ψ ( M ) ω 1 + ω 2 > 1 ,
where
ω i : = ( 1 + | β 2 | σ 2 ) I p , q α p i ( T ) + | ζ 1 | σ 1 ( T ) I p , q α p i ( η 1 ) + | ζ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) I p , q α p i ( η 2 ) + | γ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) I p , q α 1 p i ( T / p ) , i = 1 , 2 .
Then, the boundary value problem (4) has at least one solution on [ 0 , T ] .
Proof. 
Consider the operator Ψ : C C defined by (20). We first show that Ψ is continuous. Let y n be a sequence of function such that y n y on [ 0 , T / p α ] . Given that h is a continuous function on [ 0 , T / p α ] , we have
h t , y n ( p α t ) h ( t , y ( p α t ) ) .
Therefore, we obtain
Ψ y n ( t ) Ψ y ( t ) 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s , y n ( p α s ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 1 σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h s , y n ( p α s ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s , y n ( p α s ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) d p , q s + β 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s , y n ( p α s ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) d p , q s + γ 2 σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h s , y n ( p α s ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) d p , q s ,
which implies that
Ψ y n Ψ y 0 as n .
Thus, the operator F is continuous.
Next, we show that Ψ maps a bounded set into a bounded set in C [ 0 , T ] , R . For a positive number r > 0 , let B r = y C [ 0 , T ] : y r . Then, for any y B r , we have
Ψ y ( t ) = 0 t t q s p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 1 Δ ( β 2 ζ 2 ) t ( β 2 T + γ 2 ζ 2 η 2 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + ζ 2 Δ ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + β 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) f ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + γ 2 Δ ( β 1 ζ 1 ) t ( γ 1 ζ 1 η 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) f ( s , y ( p α 2 s ) ) d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 β 2 t + β 1 β 2 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) d p , q s
0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ y + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 1 | σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ y + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 2 | σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ y + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | β 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ y + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | γ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ y + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s ψ r 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 1 | σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | β 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | γ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 1 | σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | β 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | γ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s .
We have
Ψ y ψ ( r ) ω 1 + ω 2 M .
Therefore, the set Ψ B r is uniformly bounded.
Now, we show that Ψ maps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets of C [ 0 , T ] , R . Let t 1 , t 2 [ 0 , T ] with t 1 < t 2 be two points and B r be a bounded ball in Ψ . Then, for any y B r , we obtain
Ψ y ( t 2 ) Ψ y ( t 1 ) 0 t 2 ( t 2 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s 0 t 1 ( t 1 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + 1 Δ | ζ 1 ( β 2 ζ 2 ) | ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 α 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 α 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) h ( s , y ( p α 1 s ) ) d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 β 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) h ( s , y ( p α s ) ) d p , q s 0 t 1 ( t 2 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) ( t 1 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ r + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + t 1 t 2 ( t 1 q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ r + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 α 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ r + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 α 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ r + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 α 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ r + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + 1 Δ α 1 β 2 ( t 2 t 1 ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) p 1 s p α 1 ψ r + p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s .
Obviously, the right-hand side of the above inequality tends to zero independently of x B r as t 2 t 1 . Thus, it follows by the Arzelá–Ascoli theorem that Ψ : C [ 0 , T ] , R C [ 0 , T ] , R is completely continuous.
Now, the operator Ψ satisfies all the conditions of Lemma 6 and, therefore, by its conclusion, either condition ( i ) or condition ( i i ) holds.
Now, we show that the conclusion ( i i ) is not possible. Let
U = y C [ 0 , T ] , R : y M
with ψ ( M ) ω 1 + ω 2 < M . Then, it can be shown that
Ψ y ψ y 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 1 | σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | β 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 1 s p α 1 d p , q s + | γ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + 0 T ( T q s ) ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 1 | σ 1 ( T ) 0 η 1 ( η 1 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | ζ 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 η 2 ( η 2 q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | β 2 | σ 2 ( T ) 0 T ( T q s ) p , q ( α 1 ) p α 2 Γ p , q ( α ) p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s + | γ 2 | σ 2 | ( T ) 0 T / p ( T / p q s ) p , q ( α 2 ) p α 1 2 Γ p , q ( α 1 ) p 2 s p α 1 d p , q s ψ M ω 1 + ω 2 M .
Suppose there exists y U and λ ( 0 , 1 ) such that y = λ Ψ x . Then, for such choices of x and λ , we have
M = y = λ Ψ y < ψ y ω 1 + ω 2 < M .
This leads to a contradiction. Accordingly, by Lemma 6, we have that Ψ has a fixed point y U ¯ , which is a solution of the boundary value problem (4). Therefore, the proof is completed. □
Remark 3.
If p 1 , p 2 in ( A 4 ) are continuous, then ω i A p i , i = 1 , 2 , where A is defined by (23).

4. Examples

In this section, we give some examples to illustrate the investigated results.
Example 1.
Consider the following fractional ( p , q ) -difference equation with the boundary value problem
c D 1 / 4 , 1 / 5 3 / 2 y ( t ) = λ 2 sin ( t ) + tan 1 ( y ( t / 8 ) ) + y ( t / 8 ) , t [ 0 , 8 ] , y ( 0 ) + 1 2 D p , q y ( 0 ) = y ( 1 / 3 ) , 1 2 y ( 1 ) + 3 2 D p , q y ( 4 ) = y ( 2 / 3 ) .
By applying Theorem 3 with p = 1 / 4 , q = 1 / 5 , α = 3 / 2 , β 1 = 1 , γ 1 = 1 / 2 , ζ 1 = 1 , β 2 = 1 / 2 , γ 2 = 3 / 2 , ζ 2 = 1 , η 1 = 1 / 3 , η 2 = 2 / 3 , T = 1 , and λ is a constant to be fixed later on. By simple calculation, we have Δ = 1 / 12 , σ 1 ( 1 ) = 4 / 3 , and σ 2 ( 1 ) = 2 . Let
λ < 1 Γ 1 / 4 , 1 / 5 3 / 2 171 30 + 8 15 + 48 5 216 6 45 30 72 6 1 .
It is not difficult to show that
f t , y f t , z λ y z ,
for each t [ 0 , 8 ] , and
k = λ Γ 1 / 4 , 1 / 5 3 / 2 171 30 + 8 15 + 48 5 216 6 45 30 72 6 < 1 .
Then, all the assumptions of Theorem 3 are satisfied. Accordingly, by Theorem 3, the boundary value problem (28) has a unique solution.
Example 2.
Consider the following fractional ( p , q ) -difference equation with the boundary value problem
c D 1 / 4 , 1 / 5 3 / 2 y ( t ) = 1 16 cos t 2 sin ( | y ( t / 8 ) | 2 ) + e y ( t / 8 ) t 2 + 1 2 + t 2 + 1 3 , t [ 0 , 8 ] , y ( 0 ) + 1 2 D p , q y ( 0 ) = y ( 1 / 3 ) , 1 2 y ( 1 ) + 3 2 D p , q y ( 4 ) = y ( 2 / 3 ) .
By applying Theorem 5 with p = 1 / 4 , q = 1 / 5 , α = 3 / 2 , β 1 = 1 , γ 1 = 1 / 2 , ζ 1 = 1 , β 2 = 1 / 2 , γ 2 = 3 / 2 , ζ 2 = 1 , η 1 = 1 / 3 , η 2 = 2 / 3 , T = 1 . By simple calculation, we have Δ = 1 / 12 , σ 1 ( 1 ) = 4 / 3 , and σ 2 ( 1 ) = 2 .
On the other hand, we have
f ( t , y ) = 1 16 cos t 2 | sin ( | y | / 2 | ) + e y t 2 + 1 2 + t 2 + 1 3 1 32 y + 1 .
Obviously, p 1 = 1 / 16 , p 2 = 1 , ψ ( M ) = M . By simple computation, we obtain ω 1 0.9149007474 , ω 2 29.27682392 . Additionally, from the condition (27), it follows that M > 344.0315046 . Thus, all assumptions of Theorem 5 are satisfied. Therefore, the boundary value problem (29) has at least one solution.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we study nonlocal fractional ( p , q ) -difference equations with separated nonlocal boundary conditions. The existence of solutions for the problem is given by applying some well-known tools in fixed-point theory, such as Banach’s contraction mapping principle, Krasnoselskii’s fixed-point theorem, and the Leray–Schauder nonlinear alternative. Some illustrating examples are also presented. We hope that the paper will inspire interested readers working in this field to draw upon these ideas and techniques.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; investigation, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; methodology, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; validation, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; visualization, P.N., K.N., J.T., S.K.N. and B.A.; writing—original draft, P.N. and K.N.; writing—review and editing, P.N. and K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research has received funding support from the National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), Thailand.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agarwal, R.P.; Belmekki, M.; Benchohra, M. A survey on semilinear differential equations and inclusions involving Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2009, 2009, 981728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gafiychuk, V.; Datsko, B.; Meleshko, V. Mathematical modeling of different types of instabilities in time fractional reaction-diffusion system. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59, 101–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ahmad, B.; Agarwal, R.P. On nonlocal fractional boundary value problems. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. 2011, 18, 535–544. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baleanu, D.; Mustafa, O.G.; O’Regan, D. A Nagumo-like uniqueness theorem for fractional differential equations. J. Phys. Math. Theor. 2011, 44, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Wu, Y. Positive solutions for a nonlocal fractional differential equation. Nonlinear. Anal. 2011, 74, 3599–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ford, N.J.; Morgado, M.L. Fractional boundary value problems: Analysis and numerical methods. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 2011, 14, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ahmad, B.; Nieto, J.J.; Alsaidi, A.; El-Shahed, M. A study nonlinear Langevin equation involving two fractional orders in different interval. Nonlinear. Anal. 2012, 13, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K. Nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions of arbitrary order and multi-strip boundary conditions. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 98. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, F.; Nieto, J.J.; Zhou, Y. Global attractivity for nonlinear fractional differential equations. Nonlinear. Anal. 2012, 13, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kiethelm, K. The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kilbas, A.A.; Srivastava, H.M.; Trujillo, H.J. Theory and Application of the Fractional Differential Equations. In North-Holland Mathematics Studies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 204. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lakshmikantham, V.; Leela, S.; Devi, J.V. Theory of Fractional Dynamic Systyms; Cambridge Scientific Publishers: Cambridge, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller, K.S.; Ross, B. An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Differential Equations; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  14. Podlubny, I. Fractional Differential Equations; Accademic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  15. Samko, S.G.; Kilbas, A.A.; Marichev, O.I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives; Gordon and Breach Science: Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Hadamard-Type Fractional Differential Equations. In Inclusions and Inequalities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhou, Y. Basic Theory of Fractional Differential Equations; World Scientific Publishing Company: Singapore, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Quart. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson, F.H. q-Difference equations. Am. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fock, V. Zur theorie des wasserstoffatoms. Z. Physik 1935, 98, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bangerezaka, G. Variational q-calculus. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2004, 289, 650–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Asawasamrit, S.; Sudprasert, C.; Ntouyas, S.; Tariboon, J. Some results on quantum Hanh integral inequalities. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bangerezako, G. Variational calculus on q-nonuniform. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2005, 306, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Exton, H. q-Hypergeometric Functions and Applications; Hastead Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  25. Annyby, H.M.; Mansour, S.K. q-fractional Calculus and Equations; Springer: Berlin/Helidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ernst, T. A Comprehensive Treatment of q-Calculus; Springer: Basel, Swizterland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ernst, T. A History of q-Calculus and a New Method; UUDM Report 2000:16; Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ferreira, R.A.C. Nontrivial solutions for fractional q-difference boundary value problems. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2010, 2010, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aslam, M.; Awan, M.U.; Noor, K.I. Quantum Ostrowski inequalities for q-differentiable convex function. J. Math. Inequal. 2016, 10, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar]
  30. Aral, A.; Gupta, V.; Agarwal, R.P. Applications of q-Calculus in Operator Theory; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gauchman, H. Integral inequalities in q-calculus. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 47, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kunt, M.; Aljasem, M. Riemann-Liouville fractional quantum Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for convex functions. Konuralp J. Math. 2020, 8, 122–136. [Google Scholar]
  33. Dobrogowska, A.; Odzijewicz, A. A second order q-difference equation solvable by factorization method. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2006, 193, 319–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gasper, G.; Rahman, M. Some systems of multivariable orthogonal q-Racah polynomials. Ramanujan J. 2007, 13, 389–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ismail, M.E.H.; Simeonov, P. q-Difference operators for orthogonal polynomials. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2009, 233, 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Bohner, M.; Guseinov, G.S. The h-Laplace and q-Laplace transforms. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2010, 365, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. El-Shahed, M.; Hassan, H.A. Positive solutions of q-difference equation. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2010, 138, 1733–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Ahmad, B. Boundary-value problems for nonlinear third-order q-difference equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 2011, 94. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K. A study of second-order q-difference equations with boundary conditions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ahmad, B.; Nieto, J.J. On nonlocal boundary value problems of nonlinear q-difference equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  42. Al-Salam, W.A. Some fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 1967, 15, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Agarwal, R.P. Certain fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1969, 66, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Purnaras, I.K. Existence results for nonlinear q-difference equations with nonlocal boundary conditions. Comm. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 19, 59–72. [Google Scholar]
  45. El-Shahed, M.; Al-Askar, F. Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional q-difference equations. ISRN Math. Anal. 2011, 2011, 385459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ferreira, R.A.C. Positive solutions for a class of boundary value problems with fractional q-difference equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Graef, J.R.; Kong, L. Positive solutions for a class of higher order boundary value problems with fractional q-derivative. Appl. Math. Comput. 2012, 218, 9682–9689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ma, J.; Yang, J. Existence of solutions for multi-point boundary value problem of fractional q-difference equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 2011, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nuntigrangjana, T.; Putjuso, S.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Impulsive quantum (p,q)-difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 98. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chakrabarti, R.; Jagannathan, R. A (p,q)-oscillator realization of two-parameter quantum algebras. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1991, 24, L711–L718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Burban, I. Two-parameter deformation of the oscillator algebra and (p,q)-analog of two-dimensional conformal field theory. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 1995, 2, 384–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Burban, I.M.; Klimyk, A.U. (p,q)-differentiation, (p,q)-integration, and (p,q)-hypergeometric functions related to quantum groups. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 1994, 2, 15–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hounkonnou, M.N.; Désiré, J.; Kyemba, B.R. (p,q)-calculus: Differentiation and integration. SUT J. Math. 2013, 49, 145–167. [Google Scholar]
  54. Aral, A.; Gupta, V. Applications of (p,q)-gamma function to Szász durrmeyer operators. Publ. de L’Institute Math. 2017, 102, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sahai, V.; Yadav, S. Representations of two parameter quantum algebras and (p,q)-special functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2007, 335, 268–279. [Google Scholar]
  56. Sadjang, P.N. On the fundamental theorem of (p,q)-calculus and some (p. q)-taylor formulas. Results Math. 2018, 73, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Usman, T.; Saif, M.; Choi, J. Certain identities associated with (p,q)-binomial coefficients and (p,q)-Stirling polynomials of the second kind. Symmetry. 2020, 12, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sadjang, P.N. On the (p,q)-gamma and the (p,q)-beta functions. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1506.07394. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sadjang, P.N. On two (p,q)-analogues of the laplace transform. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2017, 23, 1562–1583. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mursaleen, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Khan, A. On (p,q)-analogues of Bernstein operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 266, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mursaleen, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Khan, A. Erratum to “On (p,q)-analogues of Bernstein operators”. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 278, 70–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kang, S.M.; Rafiq, A.; Acu, A.M.; Ali, F.; Kwun, Y.C. Erratum to “Some approximation properties of (p,q)-Bernstein operators”. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Mursaleen, M.; Khan, F.; Khan, A. Approximation by (p,q)-Lorentz polynomials on a compact disk. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory. 2016, 10, 1725–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Cai, Q.-B.; Zhou, G. On (p,q)-analogues of Kantorovich type Bernstein-Stancu-Schurer operator. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 276, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mursaleen, M.; Ansari, K.J.; Khan, A. Some approximation results of (p,q)-analogues of Bernstein-Stancu operators. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 264, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Acar, T.; Aral, A.; Mohiuddine, S.A. On Kantorovich modification of (p,q)-Baskakov operators. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Mursaleen, M.; Nasiruzzaman, M.; Khan, F.; Khan, A. (p,q)-analogues of divided difference and Bernstein operators. J. Nonlinear Funct. Anal. 2017, 2017, 25. [Google Scholar]
  68. Wachs, M.; White, D. (p,q)-Stirling numbers and set partition statistics. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A. 1991, 56, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wachs, M.L. σ-restricted growth functions and (p,q)-Stirling numbers. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 1994, 68, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Remmel, J.B.; Wachs, M. Rook theory, generalized Stirling numbers and (p,q)-analogues. Electron. J. Combin. 2004, 11, R84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Médics, A.D.; Leroux, P. Generalized Stirling numbers, convolution formula and (p,q)-analogues. Can. J. Math. 1995, 11, 474–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Bukweli-Kyemba, J.D.; Hounkonnou, M.N. Quantum deformed algebra: Coherent states and special functions. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1301.0116v1. [Google Scholar]
  73. Prabseang, J.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J. (p,q)-Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for double integral and (p,q)-differentiable convex functions. Axioms 2019, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Kalsoom, H.; Amer, M.; Junjua, M.D.; Hassain, S.; Shahxadi, G. (p,q)-estimates of Hermite-Hadamard-type inequalities for coordinated convex and quasi convex function. Mathematics 2019, 7, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Kamsrisuk, N.; Promsakon, C.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. Nonlocal boundary value problems for (p,q)-difference equations. J. Differ. Equ. 2018, 10, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Promsakon, C.; Kamsrisuk, N.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Tariboon, J. On the second-order (p,q)-difference equation with separated boundary conditions. Adv. Math. Phys. 2018, 2018, 9089865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Soontharanon, J.; Sitthiwirattham, T. On fractional (p,q)-calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Gradimir, V.M.; Vijay, G.N.M. (p,q)-beta functions and applications in approximation. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2018, 24, 219–237. [Google Scholar]
  79. Tun, M.; Gov, E. Some integral inequalities via (p,q)-calculus on finite intervals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2016, 19, 95. [Google Scholar]
  80. Krasnoselskii, M.A. Two remarks on the method of successive approximations. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk. 1995, 10, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
  81. Granas, A.; Dugundji, J. Fixed Point Theory and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neang, P.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Ahmad, B. Nonlocal Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Fractional (p,q)-Difference Equations. Fractal Fract. 2021, 5, 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040270

AMA Style

Neang P, Nonlaopon K, Tariboon J, Ntouyas SK, Ahmad B. Nonlocal Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Fractional (p,q)-Difference Equations. Fractal and Fractional. 2021; 5(4):270. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040270

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neang, Pheak, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Jessada Tariboon, Sotiris K. Ntouyas, and Bashir Ahmad. 2021. "Nonlocal Boundary Value Problems of Nonlinear Fractional (p,q)-Difference Equations" Fractal and Fractional 5, no. 4: 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract5040270

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop