Next Article in Journal
Advanced Analysis of Solutions with a Low-Cost Electronic Device Containing Color Sensor and Programmable Red, Green, and Blue (RGB) LED
Previous Article in Journal
A Process to Realize 2PP-Based Electrodes in Microfluidic Channels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

An Autonomous Multi-Technological LoRa Sensor Network for Landslide Monitoring †

1
Department of Industrial and Information Engineering, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
2
DEWS, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097011
Published: 13 March 2024

Abstract

:
Hazards like landslides have significant economic and societal repercussions; hence, the issue of remote structure health monitoring has grown in significance for geologic applications. Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) stand out among the new sensing architectures as a particularly well-suited solution, thanks to the versatility they offer. This research, necessary for safety reasons, predictive maintenance and emergency evacuation, presents a WSN-based landslide monitoring system with multi-technology sensor implementation. Its goal is to track the land movements on a hillside. The network is composed of long range (LoRa) sensor nodes connected using a LoRaWAN media access control (MAC) layer. The nodes are several and of different natures and help monitor land movements, hydric parameters and rockfall events, and they also offer a camera view of the landslide in case of an emergency. The system is built on an Internet of Things (IoT) framework, enabling online access to data and reports. The final work will include a system description of the hardware and functionality of all the devices, a description of the web section for remote monitoring, a power analysis and statistics from actual scenarios.

1. Introduction

Geologic hazards can be caused by the Earth’s natural processes or by human activity. In the worst circumstances, these occurrences endanger lives and inflict property loss and damage [1]. The various triggering factors for landslides include heavy rain, seismic activity, vegetation interaction and human intervention. The application of fundamental geologic engineering is the basis for the prevention of the aforementioned catastrophes [2]. Landslide-subjected situations have been studied in research in the past for several reasons, some of them being risk mitigation and land planning [3]. In the past, wired acquisition systems were often used to gather data for structural monitoring [4], encountering wiring and power constraints. WSNs can help to address these issues, especially if combined with Internet of Things (IoT) paradigms.
In this work, a remote landslide monitoring system, installed in a real scenario in Liguria, Italy, is presented. A WSN has been implemented to monitor the main system parameters.

2. System Architecture

The system architecture is equipped with hole inclinometers to observe the inclination of underground columns as those move together with the land. These sensing elements are based on a microelectromechanical system (MEMS), encapsulated in inox steel containers. Rockfall accelerometer nodes are installed on mesh protections. A weather station is used to take information on the various environmental parameters in landslide monitoring such as temperature, relative humidity, barometric pressure, rainfall, dew point, wind speed and direction and solar radiation. In the case of warnings or manual activation, a camera provides a remote view of the site for distance inspection. All the data retrieved from the inclinometer and environmental sensor nodes are then transmitted over LoRaWAN [5] to a solar-powered gateway. The camera communicates over the Wi-Fi network provided by the aforementioned gateway. The area is not covered with fixed internet access, so a cellular connection is used. Data are directed to a remote server which enables a user interface for analysis and storage. Figure 1 reports the application scheme of the proposed sensing system.
The WSN is based on low-power devices that exploit solar harvesting as an energy source. The low quiescent currents, in the range of microamperes, enable the system to operate for long periods of time in case of supply failures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and V.S.; methodology, M.R. and V.S.; software, G.B. and V.S.; validation, P.E. and V.S.; formal analysis, M.R. and P.E.; investigation, M.R.; resources, M.R., P.E., G.F. and V.S.; data curation, M.R. and V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.R. and P.E.; writing—review and editing, M.R., G.F. and V.S.; visualization, M.R., G.B. and G.F.; supervision, V.S.; project administration, V.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Frutti Carlo M+M, WeMonitoring brand, Ecogrid s.r.l. and Geoprodotti s.r.l.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gutiérrez, F.; Parise, M.; De Waele, J.; Jourde, H. A Review on Natural and Human-Induced Geohazards and Impacts in Karst. Earth Sci. Rev. 2014, 138, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Liu, G.; Wang, H. GIS-Based for Prediction and Prevention of Environmental Geological Disaster Susceptibility: From a Perspective of Sustainable Development. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 226, 112881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.; Frattini, P.; Crosta, G.B.; Zhang, L.; Agliardi, F.; Lari, S.; Yang, Z. Uncertainty Assessment in Quantitative Rockfall Risk Assessment. Landslides 2014, 11, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ishikawa, K.I.; Mita, A. Time Synchronization of a Wired Sensor Network for Structural Health Monitoring. Smart Mater. Struct. 2008, 17, 015016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haxhibeqiri, J.; De Poorter, E.; Moerman, I.; Hoebeke, J. A Survey of LoRaWAN for IoT: From Technology to Application. Sensors 2018, 18, 3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) System application scheme; (b) an installation point for one of the sensing stations.
Figure 1. (a) System application scheme; (b) an installation point for one of the sensing stations.
Proceedings 97 00011 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ragnoli, M.; Esposito, P.; Barile, G.; Ferri, G.; Stornelli, V. An Autonomous Multi-Technological LoRa Sensor Network for Landslide Monitoring. Proceedings 2024, 97, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097011

AMA Style

Ragnoli M, Esposito P, Barile G, Ferri G, Stornelli V. An Autonomous Multi-Technological LoRa Sensor Network for Landslide Monitoring. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ragnoli, Mattia, Paolo Esposito, Gianluca Barile, Giuseppe Ferri, and Vincenzo Stornelli. 2024. "An Autonomous Multi-Technological LoRa Sensor Network for Landslide Monitoring" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097011

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop