Next Article in Journal
Optical Interference Analysis of ZIF-8 Films for Chemical Vapor Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Colour Catcher®: A Low-Cost Support for Developing Colorimetric Sensors for PFOA Detection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Abstract

Development of an Indirect Photoacoustic Sensor Concept for Highly Accurate Low-ppm Gas Detection †

1
Hahn-Schickard-Gesellschaft, 78052 Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
2
Georg H. Endress Chair for Smart System Integration, Department of Microsystems Engineering–IMTEK, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the XXXV EUROSENSORS Conference, Lecce, Italy, 10–13 September 2023.
Proceedings 2024, 97(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097076
Published: 22 March 2024

Abstract

:
Indirect photoacoustic sensing (PAS) offers accurate low-ppm gas measurements, with an inverse relation of the obtained signal to the measured gas concentration. The gas is sealed in transistor outline (TO) housing using a new method. This provides a relatively a very small volume for the reference gas signal. The gas sensing system features a black body source, highly reflective measurement volumes and TO housing sealed with gas and multiple sensors. CO2 is used for testing and characterizing the sensor sealing and working concepts in the measurement range 0–2000 ppm, with other gases, such as CO, methane, etc., planned to be tested. A PAS signal corresponding to a 4 ppm minimum gas concentration is measured. Allan Deviation measurements provide a theoretical limit of detection of 3.14 ppm, with the integration time of 5.2 × 103 s.

1. Introduction

Indirect photoacoustic gas sensors offer the possibility of self-calibrating, ultra-sensitive and miniaturized sensing systems. They are at least two-chamber systems with reference and measurement chambers. To avoid cross sensitivities to a large number of gas species, the target gas itself is used as the filter medium since it features near-identical spectral characteristics [1]. The generated photoacoustic signal for a non-resonance mode of operation for a small volume is inversely proportional to the volume of the chamber [2]. Keeping this in mind, a new method was employed to hermetically seal the gas accurately in a small chamber with a pressure transducer, which offers an improvement to preliminary indirect PAS prototypes [3]. The attenuation of light due to radiation absorption between the optical source and the reference chamber was used to infer the gas concentration. The performance of this device is compared to similar state-of-the art concepts [4,5].

2. Methodology

CO2 is sealed in TO housing, along with a MEMS microphone, a photodiode and an NTC. Along with a novel gas sealing strategy, the sensor system features a custom-built lock-in amplifier PCB. The reference signal is provided by 100% CO2 sealed in the reference chamber, and mass flow controllers (MFCs) are used to vary the gas concentration in the measurement chamber from 0 ppm to 2000 ppm. Figure 1a shows a TO housing variant with tubes for gas flushing. While flushing, the ends of the tube are firmly closed by applying mechanical pressure. The ends are subsequently soldered, sealing the 100% gas concentration with all the sensor components inside a TO package.

3. Discussion

Allan Deviation measurements provided a theoretical limit of detection of 3.14 ppm, with an integration time of 5.2 × 103 s. Gas concentrations of up to 4 ppm were measured. In previous work [4], the resistance welding approach was used to seal the gas in TO housing and long measurement times were used to measure the minimum gas concentration of 250 ppm. In a related work [5], up to 100 ppm CO2 was detected. In this work, the measurement time was limited by the settling time of the lock-in amplifier. It subsequently took nearly 2 min for the standard deviation to decrease <1 µV.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., A.B. and A.D.; methodology, A.S. and A.D.; validation, A.S.; formal analysis, A.S.; investigation, A.S.; resources, A.B. and A.D.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S. and A.D.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and A.D.; visualization, A.S.; supervision, A.D.; project administration, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request. Please contact the authors for more details.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Hahn-Schickard International GmbH and Hahn-Schickard Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd., China, for their support with TO packages.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Palzer, S. Photoacoustic-based gas sensing: A review. Sensors 2020, 20, 2745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miklós, A.; Hess, P.; Bozóki, Z. Application of acoustic resonators in photoacoustic trace gas analysis and metrology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2001, 72, 1937–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Srivastava, A.; Tian, Y.; Bittner, A.; Dehé, A. Design and Characterization of Macroscopic Indirect Photoacoustic Gas Sensor. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors 2022, Dallas, TX, USA, 30 October–2 November 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huber, J.; Enriquez, J.A.; Escobar, A.; Kolb, S.; Dehé, A.; Jost, F.; Wöllenstein, J. Photoakustischer Low-Cost CO2-Sensor für Automobilanwendungen. In Automobil-Sensorik: Ausgewählte Sensorprinzipien und deren Automobile Anwendung; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 79–96. [Google Scholar]
  5. Huber, J.; Schmitt, K.; Wöllenstein, J. Simulation model for the evaluation and design of miniaturized non-resonant photoacoustic gas sensors. J. Sens. Sens. Syst. 2016, 5, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Sealed TO package in a sensor setup, (b) placement of detector elements on a TO housing base, (c) Allan Deviation plot with an integration time of 5.2 × 103 s, and (d) PAS signal output between 0 and 2000 ppm fits the negative exponential trend with an R2 score of 0.9992.
Figure 1. (a) Sealed TO package in a sensor setup, (b) placement of detector elements on a TO housing base, (c) Allan Deviation plot with an integration time of 5.2 × 103 s, and (d) PAS signal output between 0 and 2000 ppm fits the negative exponential trend with an R2 score of 0.9992.
Proceedings 97 00076 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Srivastava, A.; Bittner, A.; Dehé, A. Development of an Indirect Photoacoustic Sensor Concept for Highly Accurate Low-ppm Gas Detection. Proceedings 2024, 97, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097076

AMA Style

Srivastava A, Bittner A, Dehé A. Development of an Indirect Photoacoustic Sensor Concept for Highly Accurate Low-ppm Gas Detection. Proceedings. 2024; 97(1):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Srivastava, Ananya, Achim Bittner, and Alfons Dehé. 2024. "Development of an Indirect Photoacoustic Sensor Concept for Highly Accurate Low-ppm Gas Detection" Proceedings 97, no. 1: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024097076

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop