Next Article in Journal
In Situ Formation of Nanoparticles on Carbon Nanofiber Surface Using Ceramic Intercalating Agents
Next Article in Special Issue
A Data Driven Modelling Approach for the Strain Rate Dependent 3D Shear Deformation and Failure of Thermoplastic Fibre Reinforced Composites: Experimental Characterisation and Deriving Modelling Parameters
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Resilience and Self-Centering of Existing RC Coupled and Single Shear Walls Using EB-FRP: State-of-the-Art Review and Research Needs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Hybrid Basalt Fibres’ Length on Fresh and Mechanical Properties of Self-Compacted Ambient-Cured Geopolymer Concrete
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
J. Compos. Sci.
Volume 6
Issue 10
10.3390/jcs6100302
Review Report
jcs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Simplified Modelling of Failure in High Strength Bolts under Combined Tension and Bending

J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6(10), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6100302
by Francesco Plaitano 1,2, Aurel Stratan 1 and Elide Nastri 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Zhibin Lin
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Compos. Sci. 2022, 6(10), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6100302
Submission received: 20 August 2022 / Revised: 5 October 2022 / Accepted: 8 October 2022 / Published: 11 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Journal of Composites Science in 2022)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors presented the work by simplifying the damage experienced in bolts in FE simulation that enables capturing their performance. The research concept is nice. but the manuscript is poorly written. The reviewer just highlighted a little portion in the attachment, where those statements are awkward with many grammar issues, throughout the entire manuscript. The reviewer suggested the authors should totally revise the entire manuscript, starting with the title, abstract, and each section. 

Also, please add the findings in the abstract (where you should present why you do this research, what are your methods, and what are results. The conclusion section did not show the contribution of this study.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors provided most response through the manuscript and the reviewer suggest revising the abstract with more findings before accepting it.

Author Response

Please refer to the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have revised their paper, however, the refs number in the main text needs to be updated, they did not apper in sequence.

Author Response

Please refer to the attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop