An Exploratory Bibliometric Analysis of the Birth and Emergence of Industry 5.0
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Background
2.1. Industry 4.0
2.2. Industry 5.0
2.3. Similarities and Differences
3. Methods and Data
4. Results
4.1. Document Types
4.2. Subject Areas
4.3. Volume and Growth Trajectory
4.4. Most Influential Documents
Rank | Author(s) | Title | Source Title | Times Cited |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Özdemir and Hekim [8] | Birth of industry 5.0: Making sense of big data with artificial intelligence, “the internet of things” and next-generation technology policy | Omics: a journal of integrative biology, 22(1), 65–76 | 90 |
2 | Nahavandi [9] | Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution | Sustainability, 11(16), 4371 | 65 |
3 | Abdel-Basset, Manogaran, Gamal and Chang [78] | A novel intelligent medical decision support model based on soft computing and IoT | IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(5), 4160–4170 | 34 |
4 | Demir, Döven and Sezen [7] | Industry 5.0 and human-robot co-working | Procedia Computer Science, 158, 688–695 | 29 |
5 | Sachsenmeier [6] | Industry 5.0—the relevance and implications of bionics and synthetic biology | Engineering, 2(2), 225–229 | 26 |
6 | Bednar and Welch [79] | Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems | Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 281–298 | 22 |
7 | Javaid, Haleem, Singh, Haq, Raina and Suman [10] | Industry 5.0: Potential applications in COVID-19 | Journal of Industrial Integration and Management | 17 |
8 | Longo, Padovano and Umbrello [59] | Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: a human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future | Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4182 | 16 |
9 | Welfare et al. [80] | Consider the human work experience when integrating robotics in the workplace | 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 75–84). IEEE | 16 |
10 | Wang et al. [81] | Walrasian equilibrium-based multiobjective optimization for task allocation in mobile crowdsourcing | IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 7(4), 1033–1046 | 14 |
4.5. Most Influential Sources
4.6. Most Influential Authors
4.7. Most Influential Countries
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Concluding Comments
6.2. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- European Commission. Industry 5.0: Towards a Sustainable, Human-Centric and Resilient European Industry; European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: Luxembourg, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Di Nardo, M.; Yu, H. Special Issue. Industry 5.0: The prelude to the sixth industrial revolution. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rada, M. Industry 5.0 Definition. 2018. Available online: https://michael-rada.medium.com/industry-5-0-definition-6a2f9922dc48 (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Rada, M. Industry 5.0—From Virtual to Physical. 2015. Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/industry-50-from-virtual-physical-michael-rada (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Vollmer, M. What is Industry 5.0? 2018. Available online: https://medium.com/@marcellvollmer/what-is-industry-5-0-a363041a6f0a (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Sachsenmeier, P. Industry 5.0—The relevance and implications of bionics and synthetic biology. Engineering 2016, 2, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Demir, K.A.; Döven, G.; Sezen, B. Industry 5.0 and human-robot Co-working. Proc. Comput. Sci. 2019, 158, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özdemir, V.; Hekim, N. Birth of industry 5.0: Making sense of big data with artificial intelligence. The Internet of things and next-generation technology policy. OMICS A J. Integr. Biol. 2018, 22, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nahavandi, S. Industry 5.0—A human-centric solution. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Haq, M.I.U.; Raina, A.; Suman, R. Industry 5.0: Potential applications in COVID-19. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2020, 5, 507–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavares-Lehmann, A.T.; Varum, C. Industry 4.0 and sustainability: A bibliometric literature review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhuri, P.K.; Shukla, A.K.; Abraham, A. Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2019, 78, 218–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobo, M.; Jürgens, B.; Herrero-Solana, V.; Martínez, M.; Herrera-Viedma, E. Industry 4.0: A perspective based on bibliometric analysis. Proc. Comput. Sci. 2018, 139, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borregan-Alvarado, J.; Alvarez-Meaza, I.; Cilleruelo-Carrasco, E.; Garechana-Anacabe, G. A bibliometric analysis in industry 4.0 and advanced manufacturing: What about the sustainable supply chain? Sustainability 2020, 12, 7840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariani, M.M.; Borghi, M. Industry 4.0: A bibliometric review of its managerial intellectual structure and potential evolution in the service industries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 149, 119752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmi, A.; Elbardan, H.; Ali, R.H.R.M. Bibliometric analysis of published literature on industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC), Auckland, New Zealand, 22–25 January 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Trotta, D.; Garengo, P. Industry 4.0 key research topics: A bibliometric review. In Proceedings of the 2018 7th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM), Oxford, UK, 7–9 March 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 113–117. [Google Scholar]
- Kipper, L.M.; Furstenau, L.B.; Hoppe, D.; Frozza, R.; Iepsen, S. Scopus scientific mapping production in industry 4.0 (2011–2018): A bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 1605–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abrahamson, E.; Piazza, A. The lifecycle of management ideas. In The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas; Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Reay, T., Strang, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 42–67. [Google Scholar]
- Spell, C.S. Where do management fashions come from, and how long do they stay? J. Manag. Hist. Arch. 1999, 5, 334–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pollach, I. The diffusion of management fads: A popularization perspective. J. Manag. Hist. 2021. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. “Industry 4.0” as Promising Technology: Emergence, Semantics and Ambivalent Character; Technische Universität Dortmund: Dortmund, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Madsen, D.Ø. The emergence and rise of industry 4.0 viewed through the lens of management fashion theory. Adm. Sci. 2019, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Baur, C.; Wee, D. Manufacturing′s next act. McKinsey Q. 2015. Available online: https://timereaction.com/papers/manufacturing_next_act.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2021).
- Marr, B. What Is Industry 4.0? Here Is a Super Easy Explanation For Anyone. Forbes, 2 September 2018. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/09/02/what-is-industry-4-0-heres-a-super-easy-explanation-for-anyone/(accessed on 15 August 2021).
- Rüßmann, M.; Lorenz, M.; Gerbert, P.; Waldner, M.; Justus, J.; Engel, P.; Harnisch, M. Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston Consult. Group 2015, 9, 54–89. [Google Scholar]
- Alcácer, V.; Machado, V. Scanning the industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2019, 22, 899–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oztemel, E.; Gursev, S. Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J. Intell. Manuf. 2020, 31, 127–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bongomin, O.; Yemane, A.; Kembabazi, B.; Malanda, C.; Mwape, M.C.; Mpofu, N.S.; Tigalana, D. Industry 4.0 disruption and its neologisms in major industrial sectors: A state of the art. J. Eng. 2020, 2020, 8090521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melville, N.P.; Robert, L. The generative fourth industrial revolution: Features, affordances, and implications. Afford. Implic. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oesterreich, T.; Schuir, J.; Teuteberg, F. The Emperor′s new clothes or an enduring IT fashion? Analyzing the lifecycle of industry 4.0 through the lens of management fashion theory. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madsen, D.Ø.; Berg, T.; Veen Hansen, E.; Ekeland Solberg, S. Close encounters of the 4th kind? An exploration of the state of industry 4.0 in Norway. Int. J. Manag. Concepts Philos. 2021, 14, 168–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dastbaz, M. Industry 4.0 (i4.0): The hype, the reality, and the challenges ahead. In Industry 4.0 and Engineering for a Sustainable Future; Dastbaz, M., Cochrane, P., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reischauer, G. Industry 4.0 as policy-driven discourse to institutionalize innovation systems in manufacturing. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2018, 132, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccarozzi, M.; Aquilani, B.; Gatti, C. Industry 4.0 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grønseth, B.O.; Madsen, D.Ø. Industry 4.0. In Encyclopedia of Tourism Management and Marketing; Buhalis, D., Ed.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Fox, S. Irresponsible research and innovation? Applying findings from neuroscience to analysis of unsustainable hype cycles. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sudrajat, A.; Indartono, S. Impact and criticism of global capitalism in the industrial era 4.0. Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Hum. Res. 2019, 323, 200–206. [Google Scholar]
- Badri, A.; Boudreau-Trudel, B.; Souissi, A.S. Occupational health and safety in the industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern? Saf. Sci. 2018, 109, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kravchenko, A.; Kyzymenko, I. The forth industrial revolution: New paradigm of society development or posthumanist manifesto. Philos. Cosmol. 2019, 22, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.; Kemper, H.-G.; Feld, T.; Hoffmann, M. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doyle-Kent, M.; Kopacek, P. Industry 5.0: Is the manufacturing industry on the cusp of a new revolution? Adv. Mech. Eng. 2020, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Østergaard, E.H. Welcome to Industry 5.0. Retrieved Febr. 2018, 5, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Demir, K.; Cicibas, H. Industry 5.0 and a critique of industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 4th International Management Information Systems Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 17–20 October 2017; pp. 17–20. [Google Scholar]
- Haleem, A.; Javaid, M. Industry 5.0 and its expected applications in medical field. Curr. Med. Res. Pr. 2019, 9, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haleem, A.; Javaid, M. Industry 5.0 and its applications in orthopaedics. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma 2019, 10, 807–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skobelev, P.; Borovik, S.Y. On the way from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0: From digital manufacturing to digital society. Industry 4.0 2017, 2, 307–311. [Google Scholar]
- European Commission. Industry 5.0: Human-Centric, Sustainable and Resilient; European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: Luxembourg, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Benders, J.; Verlaar, S. Lifting parts: Putting conceptual insights into practice. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2003, 23, 757–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braam, G.; Benders, J.; Heusinkveld, S. The balanced scorecard in the Netherlands: An analysis of its evolution using print-media indicators. J. Organ. Change Manag. 2007, 20, 866–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benders, J.; Van Veen, K. What′s in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organization 2001, 8, 33–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giroux, H. ‘It was such a handy term′: Management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity. J. Manag. Stud. 2006, 43, 1227–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertens, P.; Wiener, M. Riding the digitalization wave: Toward a sustainable nomenclature in Wirtschaftsinformatik. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2018, 60, 367–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moeuf, A.; Pellerin, R.; Lamouri, S.; Tamayo, S.; Barbaray, R. The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 1118–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pereira, A.C.; Romero, F. A review of the meanings and the implications of the industry 4.0 concept. Proc. Manuf. 2017, 13, 1206–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frederico, G. From supply chain 4.0 to supply chain 5.0: Findings from a systematic literature review and research directions. Logistics 2021, 5, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pillai, S.G.; Haldorai, K.; Seo, W.S.; Kim, W.G. COVID-19 and hospitality 5.0: Redefining hospitality operations. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 94, 102869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopp, R.; Howaldt, J.; Schultze, J. Why industry 4.0 needs workplace innovation: A critical look at the German debate on advanced manufacturing. Eur. J. Work. Innov. 2016, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longo, F.; Padovano, A.; Umbrello, S. Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: A human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, J.; Abrahamsson, L.; Kåreborn, B.B.; Fältholm, Y.; Grane, C.; Wykowska, A. Work and organization in a digital industrial context. Manag. Rev. 2017, 28, 281–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yordanova, K. The Curious Case of Industry 5.0. Available online: https://www.law.kuleuven.be/citip/blog/the-curious-case-of-industry-5-0/ (accessed on 15 September 2021).
- Ellegaard, O.; Wallin, J.A. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Science 2015, 105, 1809–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Donthu, N.; Kumar, S.; Mukherjee, D.; Pandey, N.; Lim, W.M. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 133, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zupic, I.; Čater, T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods 2014, 18, 429–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strang, D.; Wittrock, C. Methods for the study of management ideas. In Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas; Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Rey, T., Strang, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 86–103. [Google Scholar]
- Benders, J.; Nijholt, J.; Heusinkveld, S. Using print media indicators in management fashion research. Qual. Quant. 2007, 41, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, T. The fashion of management fashion: A surge too far? Organization 2004, 11, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cobo, M.J.; Lopez-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J. Inf. 2011, 5, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balstad, M.T.; Berg, T. A long-term bibliometric analysis of journals influencing management accounting and control research. J. Manag. Control 2020, 30, 357–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Buer, S.-V.; Strandhagen, J.O.; Chan, F.T.S. The link between industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: Mapping current research and establishing a research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 2924–2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liao, Y.; Deschamps, F.; De Loures, E.F.R.; Ramos, L.F.P. Past, present and future of industry 4.0—A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 3609–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huczynski, A. Portrayals of management fashions in contemporary management and organisational behavior textbooks. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2011, 9, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furusten, S. Popular Management Books—How They are Made and What They Mean for Organisations; Routledge: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Engwall, L.; Wedlin, L. Business studies and management ideas. In Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas; Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Reay, T., Strang, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Goodrum, A.A.; McCain, K.W.; Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L. Scholarly publishing in the Internet age: A citation analysis of computer science literature. Inf. Process. Manag. 2001, 37, 661–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2009, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Janik, A.; Ryszko, A. Mapping the field of Industry 4.0 based on bibliometric analysis. In Proceedings of the 32nd IBIMA Conference, Seville, Spain, 15–16 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Abdel-Basset, M.; Manogaran, G.; Gamal, A.; Chang, V. A novel intelligent medical decision support model based on soft computing and IoT. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 7, 4160–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednar, P.; Welch, C. Socio-technical perspectives on smart working: Creating meaningful and sustainable systems. Inf. Syst. Front. 2020, 22, 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Welfare, K.S.; Hallowell, M.R.; Shah, J.A.; Riek, L.D. Consider the human work experience when integrating robotics in the workplace. In Proceedings of the 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Daegu, Korea, 11–14 March 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 75–84. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Zhan, Z.-H.; Zhao, B.; Tong, X.; Qi, L. Walrasian equilibrium-based multiobjective optimization for task allocation in mobile crowdsourcing. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2020, 7, 1033–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madsen, D.Ø.; Slåtten, K. Social media and management fashions. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2015, 2, 1122256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barros, M.; Rüling, C.-C. Business media. In The Oxford Handbook of Management Ideas; Sturdy, A., Heusinkveld, S., Reay, T., Strang, D., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2019; pp. 195–215. [Google Scholar]
- Piazza, A.; Abrahamson, E. Fads and fashions in management practices: Taking stock and looking forward. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2020, 22, 264–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kieser, A. Rhetoric and myth in management fashion. Organization 1997, 4, 49–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zorn, T.; Collins, E. Is sustainability sustainable? Corporate social responsibility, sustainable business, and management fashion. In The Debate over Corporate Social Responsibility; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 405–416. [Google Scholar]
- Mitra, R. Sustainability and sustainable development. In The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Madsen, D.Ø.; Stenheim, T. Is corporate social responsibility a management fashion in Norway? Some preliminary evidence. Eur. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 14, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dantas, T.; De-Souza, E.; Destro, I.; Hammes, G.; Rodriguez, C.; Soares, S. How the combination of circular economy and industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the sustainable development goals. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zengin, Y.; Naktiyok, S.; Kaygın, E.; Kavak, O.; Topçuoğlu, E. An investigation upon industry 4.0 and society 5.0 within the context of sustainable development goals. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stock, T.; Obenaus, M.; Kunz, S.; Kohl, H. Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2018, 118, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madsen, D.Ø.; Stenheim, T. Doing research on ‘management fashions’: Methodological challenges and opportunities. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2013, 11, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Carson, P.P.; Lanier, P.A.; Carson, K.D.; Birkenmeier, B.J. A historical perspective on fad adoption and abandonment. J. Manag. Hist. Arch. 1999, 5, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Database | Scopus |
---|---|
Search query | TITLE-ABS-KEY (“Industry 5.0”) AND PUBYEAR > 2014 |
Time period | 2015–2021 |
Date of query | 13 September 2021 |
Categories | All |
Sources | All |
Languages | Any |
Number of documents | 92 |
Source | Documents | Citations |
---|---|---|
Omics: A Journal of Integrative Biology | 2 | 90 |
Sustainability | 4 | 67 |
IEEE Internet of Things Journal | 1 | 34 |
Journal of Industrial Integration and Management | 2 | 29 |
Procedia Computer Science | 1 | 29 |
Engineering | 1 | 26 |
Information Systems Frontiers | 1 | 22 |
Applied Sciences | 1 | 16 |
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction | 1 | 16 |
Journal of the Knowledge Economy | 5 | 15 |
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems | 1 | 14 |
Information | 1 | 10 |
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma | 1 | 9 |
Conference Proceedings of 2019 10th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies, DESSERT | 1 | 9 |
International Journal of Supply Chain Management | 2 | 9 |
Author | Documents | Citations |
---|---|---|
Hekim, N | 2 | 90 |
Özdemir, V | 2 | 90 |
Nahavandi, S | 2 | 67 |
Haleem, A | 3 | 38 |
Javaid, M | 3 | 38 |
Abdel-Basset, M | 1 | 34 |
Chang, V | 1 | 34 |
Gamal, A | 1 | 34 |
Manogaran, G | 1 | 34 |
Demir, K.A. | 2 | 30 |
Döven, G | 1 | 29 |
Sezen, B | 1 | 29 |
Sachsenmeier, P | 1 | 26 |
Bednar, P.M. | 1 | 22 |
Welch, C | 1 | 22 |
Country | Documents | Citations |
---|---|---|
India | 13 | 143 |
Turkey | 4 | 120 |
United States | 13 | 94 |
China | 8 | 93 |
Canada | 4 | 92 |
United Kingdom | 4 | 82 |
Australia | 6 | 74 |
Egypt | 1 | 34 |
Italy | 9 | 24 |
Sweden | 1 | 22 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Madsen, D.Ø.; Berg, T. An Exploratory Bibliometric Analysis of the Birth and Emergence of Industry 5.0. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021, 4, 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4040087
Madsen DØ, Berg T. An Exploratory Bibliometric Analysis of the Birth and Emergence of Industry 5.0. Applied System Innovation. 2021; 4(4):87. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4040087
Chicago/Turabian StyleMadsen, Dag Øivind, and Terje Berg. 2021. "An Exploratory Bibliometric Analysis of the Birth and Emergence of Industry 5.0" Applied System Innovation 4, no. 4: 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi4040087