Previous Issue
Volume 5, March
 
 

Dairy, Volume 5, Issue 2 (June 2024) – 1 article

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 1202 KiB  
Article
First Lactation Milk Yield Predicted by the Heifer’s Growth Curve Derivatives
by Aurelio Guevara-Escobar, Mónica Cervantes-Jiménez, Vicente Lemus-Ramírez, José Guadalupe García-Muñiz and Adolfo Kunio Yabuta Osorio
Dairy 2024, 5(2), 239-248; https://doi.org/10.3390/dairy5020020 (registering DOI) - 28 Apr 2024
Abstract
Replacement heifers are regularly weighed to assess their health. These data also predict the milk yield in their first lactation (L). The first derivative of the growth curve represents the weight change rate at a given time. It is interesting to use the [...] Read more.
Replacement heifers are regularly weighed to assess their health. These data also predict the milk yield in their first lactation (L). The first derivative of the growth curve represents the weight change rate at a given time. It is interesting to use the higher-order derivatives of one biological process, such as growth, to predict the outcome of another process, like lactation. With 78 records of grazing heifers, machine learning was used to predict the L based on variables calculated during the rearing period, from 3 to 21 months of age, every 3 months: body weight (P), first (1D), and second derivative (2D) of an individually modeled Fourier function. Other variables were the age at effective insemination (AI) and the season of the year when the heifer was born (E). The average deviation of the fitted models represented the goodness of fit. The models were trained using 85% of the records, and the fit was evaluated using the remaining data. The deviation was lower for the models including both derivatives in comparison to the models where the derivatives were not included (p = 0.022). The best models predicted the L using data of heifers at six months of age (r2 = 0.62) and the importance of the variables in the model was 35, 28, 21, and 16% for 1D, AI, 2D, and P, respectively. By utilizing this type of model, it would be possible to select and eliminate excess heifers early on, thereby reducing the financial and environmental costs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop