Next Article in Journal
Novel Coatings Based on Nanostructured Cefepime-Functionalized Magnetite for Implantable Devices
Previous Article in Journal
NiOOH/FeOOH Supported on Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite Electrodes for Ethanol Electrooxidation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Natural Coatings on Titanium Surfaces to Improve Their Biological Response †

1
Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, 10129 Torino, Italy
2
Innovation Center Iceland, 112 Reykjavík, Iceland
3
Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, University of Sao Paulo, 14025-190 São Paulo, Brazil
4
Genis hf., Aðalgata 34, 580 Siglufjörður, Iceland
5
Dipartimento di Scienze della Sanità Pubblica e Pediatriche—Sezione di Microbiologia, Università di Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy
6
Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
7
CNR-IPCB, Naples, 80125 Naples, Italy
8
CNR-STIIMA Biella, 13900 Biella, Italy
9
CNR-IMAMOTER, 10135 Torino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd Coatings and Interfaces Web Conference, 15–31 May 2020; Available online: https://ciwc2020.sciforum.net/.
Mater. Proc. 2020, 2(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/CIWC2020-06835
Published: 14 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of 2nd Coatings and Interfaces Web Conference (CIWC-2 2020))

Abstract

:
Biomolecules and extracts from natural products are gaining increasing interest due to their beneficial properties for human health, low toxicity, environmental compatibility and sustainability. In this work, keratin, chitosan and peppermint essential oil have been used for the preparation of coatings on titanium substrates for biomedical implants/devices. All these coatings were obtained from local natural products/byproducts: keratin from discarded wool, chitosan from shrimp shells and peppermint essential oils from a local production. The above cited molecules were selected for their ability to stimulate soft tissue adhesion (keratin), anti-inflammatory activity (chitosan) and antibacterial activity (keratin after metal ion doping, chitosan and mint oil). The coatings were characterized by means of SEM-EDS, FTIR, zeta potential, wettability, tape and scratch tests, and cell and bacteria cultures. The coatings were successfully obtained for all the considered natural substances with good adhesion to the titanium substrates. All the coatings are chemically stable in water and the continuous coatings are mechanically resistant and protective for the metallic substrates. The keratin coatings are hydrophilic while the mint oil and chitosan coatings are hydrophobic; nanofibers, instead of continuous coatings, behave as more hydrophobic. At the physiological pH, the keratin and mint oil coatings are negatively charged when in contact with an aqueous environment, while the chitosan ones are positively charged. The oriented keratin fibers are able to drive fibroblast alignment. The Ag-doped keratin fibers and mint coating show antibacterial properties.

1. Introduction

Natural products are gaining increasing interest in the field of medicine due to their numerous beneficial properties (such as antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory) and few side effects (e.g., limited toxicity and bacterial resistance). Moreover, they can be often obtained from abundant byproducts of different industries (food and beverages or textile, to cite some examples).
Among natural products, keratin, chitosan and peppermint essential oils have been selected in the present research as possible substances for the obtainment of coatings of interest in the biomedical field.
Keratin has been selected for its ability to stimulate soft tissue growth [1,2] and the possibility to be doped with metal ions to confer antibacterial activity [3]. Chitosan has been selected for its antibacterial and antioxidant properties [4] and peppermint essential oil for its antibacterial properties [5].
All these substances were obtained from industrial byproducts or local products in order to promote a sustainable use of resources, with the transformation of byproducts in high added value products and to sustain local economies.
In this view, keratin was obtained from discarded wool, chitosan from shrimp shells and peppermint essential oil from the local mint production.
Keratin, chitosan and peppermint essential oil were used to prepare organic natural coatings onto commercially pure titanium and Ti6Al4V alloy. Samples were characterized by means of SEM-EDS, FTIR, zeta potential, wettability, tape and scratch tests, and cell and bacteria cultures.

2. Materials and Methods

Keratin was obtained by discarded wool from the textile industry by sulfitolysis with sodium metabisulfite, purified and freeze-dried in powder, as described in [6]. Keratin coatings, in the form of random or oriented sub-micrometric fibers, on polished or grooved commercially pure titanium surfaces, were obtained, from keratin solutions in formic acid, by electrospinning as described in [6,7]. Moreover, keratin continuous coatings were obtained on polished commercially pure titanium substrates, from keratin solution in water, by manual application and spreading of a drop of solution and further drying in air. All the coatings were thermally treated for 2 h at 180 °C to confer them stability [8]. Part of the random submicrometric fiber coatings was soaked in silver nitrate aqueous solution in order to obtain silver doping [3].
Chitosan was obtained from shrimps’ shells (Genis hf). Continuous chitosan coatings were prepared onto chemically treated Ti6Al4V substrates. The chemical treatments in [9] foresee an acid etching followed by a controlled oxidation to obtain a nanotextured surface rich in hydroxyl groups. Chitosan grafting was performed directly, using tresyl chloride as a good outgoing group or using polydopamine as a linker.
Peppermint essential oil coatings were performed on chemically treated Ti6Al4V substrates (as for chitosan coatings) by means of application and spreading of a drop of pure oil and further drying at 37 °C in an incubator [10].
Surface morphology and semi-quantitative chemical composition were investigated by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy equipped with Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (FESEM-EDS SUPRATM 40, Zeiss and Merlin Gemini Zeiss). The appearance and distribution of mint essential oil coating (which is autofluorescent) was investigated by means of fluorescent microscopy (Zeiss LSM900, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The characteristic chemical groups of the coating molecules were further determined by means of Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (Tensor 37 micro-FTIR with Hyperion 2000 Microscope-Bruker Optics, Ettlingen, Germany). The adhesion of the coatings to the substrates was evaluated by means of tape test (ASTM D 3359-97) and scratch tests (CSM, Revetest machine). The wettability of the coatings was evaluated by means of contact angle measurements (sessile drop method, DSA-100, KRÜSS GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) with ultrapure water as wetting fluid.
Surface charge in the function of pH was determined by zeta potential electrokinetic measurements (SurPASS, Anton Paar, adjustable gap cell) in 0.001 M KCl titrated with 0.05 M HCl and 0.05 M NaOH.
The antibacterial activity of silver-doped keratin coatings and of peppermint essential oil coatings was evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus, since it is one of the most widespread pathogens [3,10].
The biocompatibility and fibroblast guidance ability of submicrometric fiber keratin coatings was evaluated with human gingival fibroblasts, because the application of these materials is intended in contact with soft tissues [3,6,7].

3. Results and Discussion

The appearance of the various coatings is shown in Figure 1 through SEM micrographs for keratin and chitosan coatings (obtained by direct grafting) and fluorescence microscopy image for peppermint essential oil, as examples.
The SEM micrographs of the continuous keratin (Figure 1a) and chitosan coatings (Figure 1c) and the fluorescence image of the peppermint essential oil coating (Figure 1d) highlight homogeneous and substantially smooth coatings (except of sub micrometric spot-like features in the keratin coating). On the other hand, as expected, the keratin electrospun coatings are characterized by sub-micrometric mainly regular fibers. It can be noticed that all the continuous coatings completely cover the substrate topography, exposing the biological environment to the topography and to the chemistry of the coatings. Differently, the sub-micrometric keratin fibers can be modulated in order to completely cover the substrate or partially expose it; this can be of interest if the substrate features are a complementary stimulus for the cells, as previously demonstrated by the authors with aligned submicrometric keratin fibers deposited on grooved titanium substrates [7].
The FTIR spectra (not reported) confirm for all the tested samples the effectiveness of the coating, evidencing the presence of the characteristic vibration peaks of the keratin, chitosan and peppermint essential oil constituents on the coated surfaces. All the coatings that resulted stable in water and FTIR spectra (as well as SEM and fluorescence observations) confirm their presence after two weeks soaking in aqueous media.
The adhesion of the continuous keratin coatings, chitosan and peppermint essential oil coatings to the titanium substrates is optimal (5B classification according to ASTM D 3359-97 standard, no detachment). A certain reduction in adhesion (compared to the continuous coatings) has been evidenced for the fibrous keratin coating, and this can be associated to the lower availability of contact points for adhesion. Proper surface treatments are currently under investigation to take these coatings also to the same standard of the continuous ones.
The scratch tests evidenced a good adhesion for the continuous keratin coatings and peppermint essential oil coatings, confirming the tape test results. Moreover, these tests evidenced a significant protection ability of the coating for the metallic substrate. In fact, despite the plastic deformation of the metal during the test (due to the application of a progressive load up to 10 N with a diamond indenter), no damages of the surface occurred on the coated samples, which is different to the uncoated ones [11].
Water wettability of the coatings investigated here is reported in Figure 2.
The keratin continuous coatings are more hydrophilic than the titanium substrate. This behavior can be associated with the hydrophilic nature of keratin, reported in the literature [12]. On the other hand, the sub-micrometric fiber keratin coatings show an increase in the contact angle which can be attributed to the peculiar topography, rather than to the coating chemistry [6]. Both the chitosan and peppermint essential oil coatings are more hydrophobic than the Ti6Al4V substrate, and this behavior can be mainly associated to their chemistry. The contact angle measurements were an effective and simple technique to characterize the water wettability of these materials and to confirm and verify the coating presence.
Maintenance of surface hydrophobicity confirmed the permanence of the chitosan and peppermint essential oil coatings on the titanium substrates after soaking in water-based media.
The zeta potential titration curves of the bare and coated substrates are reported in Figure 3.
Figure 3a shows the zeta potential vs. pH of commercially pure titanium bare or keratin coated. Ti-cp has an isoelectric point close to 4 (as reported in the literature [13]), consistent with the absence of specific functional groups. The introduction of keratin, both as continuous coating or as submicrometric fibers, shifts the isoelectric point to more acidic values (3.4 and 2.8, respectively) and exposes functional groups with acidic behavior (COOH of the keratin molecules). The presence of these acidic functional groups is confirmed by the plateau in the basic region, observable in both curves.
The chemically treated Ti6Al4 alloy (Ti6Al4V–CT) has a very acidic Isoelectric Point (IEP) (close to 2 and obtained only by curve interpolation) due to exposition of the acidic OH groups, as previously reported by the authors [14,15]. The mint essential oil coating shifts the IEP close to 4 in accordance with the absence of specific charged functional groups. This feature is confirmed by the absence of a plateau in the curve. Finally, chitosan coating shifts the IEP to basic values (8.5) in accordance with the IEP of chitosan [16] and the presence of basic amino groups. In this case, only the measurement of zeta potential in the basic range was possible due to chitosan swelling at moderately acid pH.
The bare substrates, keratin and mint essential oil coatings have acidic IEPs and consequently are negatively charged at the physiological pH. On the other hand, chitosan has a basic IEP and consequently it is the only surface positively charged at the physiological pH.
All the measurements, except those of the keratin continuous coating at pH 3.7, show a very small standard deviation, which can be associated with their chemical stability in aqueous media in a wide pH range [14].
Bacterial adhesion (in terms of biofilm formation) was reduced by one order of magnitude on the mint essential oil coatings and by three orders of magnitude on the silver-doped keratin coatings, evidencing mainly a bacteriostatic effect for mint and an active antibacterial activity for the silver-doped keratin fibers.
The keratin coated samples resulted completely biocompatible for human gingival fibroblast cells, both with and without silver doping. A significant increase in fibroblast proliferation was observed for the keratin coated samples with respect to the bare substrate [6]. Moreover, the aligned keratin fibers are able to drive fibroblast orientation [7].

4. Conclusions

Keratin, chitosan and peppermint essential oil coatings were successfully obtained on titanium surfaces. Keratin was obtained from discarded wool, chitosan from shrimp shells and peppermint essential oil from local production with a sustainable use of resources and promotion of local economies. Numerous techniques (such as SEM-EDS, FTIR, fluorescence microscopy, wettability and zeta potential measurements) were effective and complementary for the complete chemical and physical characterization of the coatings.
All the coatings have good adhesion to the substrates, good stability in water-based media and the ability to protect the metallic substrate. The keratin coatings are hydrophilic while the mint oil and chitosan coatings are hydrophobic. At the physiological pH, the keratin and mint oil coatings are negatively charged while the chitosan ones are positively charged.
The biological tests evidenced that the oriented keratin fibers are able to drive fibroblast alignment and that the Ag-doped keratin fibers and mint coatings have antibacterial properties.
In conclusion, the natural coatings proposed here, obtained from abundant byproducts or local productions, are promising for the improvement of the biological properties of titanium substrates with a sustainable use of resources.

Acknowledgments

This activity was partially funded by the European Commission, Project NAT4MORE (NATural molecules on the surface of bioactive materials FOR MOdulating the host REsponse to implants)–M.ERANET Call 2016.

References

  1. Yamauchi, K.; Maniwa, M.; Mori, T.J. Cultivation of fibroblast cells on keratin-coated substrata. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 1998, 9, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tachibana, A.; Furuta, Y.; Takeshima, H.; Tanabe, T.; Yamauchi, K. Fabrication of wool keratin sponge scaffolds for long-term cell cultivation. J. Biotechnol. 2002, 93, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cochis, A.; Ferraris, S.; Sorrentino, R.; Azzimonti, B.; Novara, C.; Geobaldo, F.; Truffa Giachet, F.; Vineis, C.; Varesano, A.; Sayed Abdelgeliel, A.; et al. Silver-doped keratin nanofibers preserve a titanium surface from biofilm contamination and favor soft-tissue healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 8366–8377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Costa, E.M.; Silva, S.; Veiga, M.; Tavaria, F.K.; Pintado, M.M. A review of chitosan’s effect on oral biofilms: Perspectives from the tube to the mouth. J. Oral Biosci. 2017, 59, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, R.; Shushni, M.A.M.; Belkheir, A. Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of Mentha piperita L. Arab. J. Chem. 2015, 8, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferraris, S.; Truffa, F.; Giachet, M.; Miola, Bertone, E.; Varesano, A.; Vineis, C.; Cochis, A.; Sorrentino, R.; Rimondini, L.; Spriano, S. Nanogrooves and keratin nanofibers on titanium surfaces aimed at driving gingival fibroblasts alignment and proliferation without increasing bacterial adhesion. Mat. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 76, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ferraris, S.; Guarino, V.; Cochis, A.; Varesano, A.; Cruz Maya, I.; Vineis, C.; Rimondini, L.; Spriano, S. Aligned keratin submicrometric-fibers for fibroblasts guidance onto nanogrooved titanium surfaces for transmucosal implants. Mater. Lett. 2018, 229, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  8. Varesano, A.; Vineis, C.; Tonetti, C.; Sanchez Ramirez, D.O.; Mazzuchetti, G. Chemical and Physical Modifications of Electrospun Keratin Nanofibers Induced by Heating Treatments. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 40532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ferraris, S.; Spriano, S.; Pan, G.; Venturello, A.; Bianchi, C.L.; Chiesa, R.; Faga, M.G.; Maina, G.; Vernè, E. Surface modification of Ti-6Al-4V alloy for biomineralization and specific biological response: Part I, inorganic modification. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2011, 22, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cazzola, M.; Ferraris, S.; Allizond, V.; Bertea, C.M.; Novara, C.; Cochis, A.; Geobaldo, F.; Bistolfi, A.; Cuffini, A.M.; Rimondini, L.; et al. Grafting of the peppermint essential oil to a chemically treated Ti6Al4V alloy to counteract the bacterial adhesion. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 378, 125011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cazzola, M.; Ferraris, S.; Banche, G.; Gautier Di Confiengo, G.; Geobaldo, F.; Novara, C.; Spriano, S. Innovative Coatings Based on Peppermint Essential Oil on Titanium and Steel Substrates: Chemical and Mechanical Protection Ability. Materials 2020, 13, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Curcio, M.; Blanco-Fernandez, B.; Diaz-Gomez, L.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Hydrophobically modified keratin vesicles for GSH-responsive intracellular drug release. Bioconj. Chem. 2015, 26, 1900–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bal, B.S.; Rahaman, M.N. Orthopedic applications of silicon nitride ceramics. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 2889–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ferraris, S.; Yamaguchi, S.; Barbani, N.; Cazzola, M.; Cristallini, C.; Miola, M.; Vernè, E.; Spriano, S. Bioactive materials: In vitro investigation of different mechanisms of hydroxyapatite precipitation. Acta Biomater. 2020, 102, 468–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ferraris, S.; Cazzola, M.; Peretti, V.; Stella, B.; Spriano, S. Zeta Potential Measurements on Solid Surfaces for in Vitro Biomaterials Testing: Surface Charge, Reactivity Upon Contact with Fluids and Protein Absorption. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Swain, S.K.; Dey, R.K.; Islam, M.; Patel, R.K.; Jha, U.; Patnaik, T.; Airoldi, C. Removal of Fluoride from Aqueous Solution Using Aluminum-Impregnated Chitosan Biopolymer. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2009, 44, 2096–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of (a) keratin continuous coating, (b) keratin electrospun sub-micrometric fibers coating, (c) chitosan (direct grafting) continuous coating and (d) a fluorescence microscopy image of peppermint essential oil coating.
Figure 1. SEM micrographs of (a) keratin continuous coating, (b) keratin electrospun sub-micrometric fibers coating, (c) chitosan (direct grafting) continuous coating and (d) a fluorescence microscopy image of peppermint essential oil coating.
Materproc 02 00018 g001
Figure 2. Water wettability of the different tested coatings.
Figure 2. Water wettability of the different tested coatings.
Materproc 02 00018 g002
Figure 3. Zeta potential titration curves. (a) Ti-cp and its continuous or fibrous coatings, (b) Ti6Al4V-CT and its mint essential oil or chitosan coatings.
Figure 3. Zeta potential titration curves. (a) Ti-cp and its continuous or fibrous coatings, (b) Ti6Al4V-CT and its mint essential oil or chitosan coatings.
Materproc 02 00018 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferraris, S.; Verné, E.; Örlygsson, G.; Tambasco, P.; Sehn, F.P.; Ng, C.-H.; Janusson, H.; Banche, G.; Allizond, V.; Bertea, C.M.; et al. Natural Coatings on Titanium Surfaces to Improve Their Biological Response. Mater. Proc. 2020, 2, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/CIWC2020-06835

AMA Style

Ferraris S, Verné E, Örlygsson G, Tambasco P, Sehn FP, Ng C-H, Janusson H, Banche G, Allizond V, Bertea CM, et al. Natural Coatings on Titanium Surfaces to Improve Their Biological Response. Materials Proceedings. 2020; 2(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/CIWC2020-06835

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferraris, Sara, Enrica Verné, Gissur Örlygsson, Paulo Tambasco, Felipe Perraro Sehn, Chuen-How Ng, Hilmar Janusson, Giuliana Banche, Valeria Allizond, Cinzia Margherita Bertea, and et al. 2020. "Natural Coatings on Titanium Surfaces to Improve Their Biological Response" Materials Proceedings 2, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/CIWC2020-06835

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop