Novel Research on Imaging Techniques for Biomedical Applications

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomedical Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 December 2022) | Viewed by 2857

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardio-Cerebral Vascular Detection Technology and Medicinal Effectiveness Appraisal, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Interests: super-resolution imaging; optogenetics; biophotonics; membrane traffic; biophysics
College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
Interests: super-resolution imaging; organelle dynamics; fluorescent probes
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Since the discovery of X-rays in 1895, biomedical imaging has been widely developed and applied for accurate diagnosis and potential treatment plans. Besides the most common medical-imaging modalities (X-ray radiography, ultrasonography, X-ray computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission computed tomography (PET), etc.), research modalities include various optical-imaging techniques (confocal, multiphoton, total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM), super-resolution fluorescence microscopy), electron microscopy, mass spectrometry imaging, bioluminescence, variations of endoscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), optoacoustic imaging, etc.

Most of these techniques work based on either radiography or radiology, suitable for distinct biomedical areas: imaging molecular and cellular biomarkers, single-cell imaging, and imaging therapeutics. As novel imaging devices, image-processing algorithms, and probes/labels continually emerge, together these contribute to the development of biomedical imaging.

This Special Issue will publish high-quality, original research papers in the overlapping fields of:

  • X-ray radiography / X-ray computed tomography;
  • Ultrasound imaging;
  • Magnetic resonance imaging;
  • Positron emission tomography/Single-photon emission tomography;
  • Fluorescence imaging;
  • Bioluminescence imaging;
  • Photoacoustic imaging;
  • Spectral imaging;
  • Phase imaging.

Prof. Dr. Yingke Xu
Dr. Yubing Han
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • microscopy
  • MRI
  • biophotonics
  • functional imaging
  • molecular imaging
  • image processing
  • fluorescent labeling
  • ultrasound imaging

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Other

19 pages, 660 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Application of Eye-Tracking Technology in the Assessment of Radiology Practices: A Systematic Review
by Elizabeth Arthur and Zhonghua Sun
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(16), 8267; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168267 - 18 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2208
Abstract
The aim of this review is to provide an in-depth analysis of literature pertaining to the use of eye-tracking equipment in the evaluation of radiological image interpretation by professionals in clinical practice. A systematic search of current literature was conducted through the databases [...] Read more.
The aim of this review is to provide an in-depth analysis of literature pertaining to the use of eye-tracking equipment in the evaluation of radiological image interpretation by professionals in clinical practice. A systematic search of current literature was conducted through the databases of CINAHL, Medline, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Wiley Online Library. A total of 25 articles were included in the final analysis. The literature gathered referenced four main discussions, which were competency assessment, educational tools, visual search behaviour and assistive aid evaluations. The majority of articles (68%) referenced to the competency assessment of professional groups yet appeared to have conflicting results within the categories of speed and eye-metrics. Significant conclusions could be made pertaining to confidence (100%) and accuracy measurements (56%), which suggested a background of higher experience correlates to a higher rate of accuracy and a higher confidence level. Other findings regarding the main themes focused on eye-tracking as an educational tool, where the literature suggests that such equipment may be useful in improving educational repertoire and interpretation technique. Literature pertaining to the visual search behaviour analysis and the evaluation of assistive aids did not provide strong conclusions due to research limitations. Whilst the use of eye-tracking in the analysis of radiological practices is a promising new venture to quantify the interpretation patterns of professionals, undertaking future research is recommended to solidify conclusions and provide greater insight. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Research on Imaging Techniques for Biomedical Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop