applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Multi-criteria/Multi-objective Decision Making and Recommender Systems

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Computing and Artificial Intelligence".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 July 2024) | Viewed by 2753

Special Issue Editor

Department of Information Technology and Management, College of Computing,Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA
Interests: recommender systems; user modeling; technology-enhanced learning; fintech
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Recommender systems (RSs) have been widely applied to several domains and applications. Traditional RSs usually deal with a single objective, such as minimizing the prediction errors or maximizing the ranking of the recommendation list. There is an emerging demand for multi-objective/multi-criteria optimization so that the development of recommendation models can take multiple objectives/criteria into consideration. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) has been well established and developed for business intelligence, while multi-objective optimization (MOO) can be one of the solutions in MCDM. However, there is a gap between the MCDM/MOO theories and its applications in the area of recommender systems. This Special Issue encourages submissions related to multi-objective/multi-criteria recommender systems. Particularly, we are interested in technologies or solutions that can fill the gap between MCDM/MOO theories and its applications in RSs.

Below is a list of relevant articles for this Special Issue:

  • Yong Zheng, David (Xuejun) Wang. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Recommender Systems", The 28th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM IUI), Sydney, Australia, March, 2023
  • Yong Zheng, David (Xuejun) Wang. "A Survey of Recommender Systems with Multi-Objective Optimization", Neurocomputing, Vol. 474, p. 141-153, Elsevier, 2022
  • Reinaldo Silva Fortes, Daniel Xavier de Sousa, Dayanne G. Coelho, Anisio M. Lacerda, and Marcos André Gonçalves. "Individualized extreme dominance (IndED): A new preference-based method for multi-objective recommender systems".  Information Sciences, Volume 572, 2021
  • Yong Zheng, David (Xuejun) Wang. "Multi-Objective Recommendations", Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), August, 2021
  • Reinaldo Silva Fortes, Anisio Mendes Lacerda, Alan R.R. Freitas, Carlos Bruckner, Dayanne Coelho, and Marcos André Gonçalves. "User-oriented Objective Prioritization for Meta-Featured Multi-Objective Recommender Systems". In Proceedings of the User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP). Singapore. July, 2018
  • Reinaldo Silva Fortes, Alan R.R. de Freitas, and Marcos André Gonçalves. "A Multicriteria Evaluation of Hybrid Recommender Systems: On the Usefulness of Input Data Characteristics". In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS. Porto, Portugal. April, 2017

The topics of interests in this Special Issue include (but are not limited to):

Multi-Objective/Multi-Criteria Recommendations

  • Novel multi-objective/multi-criteria recommendation applications;
  • Promising multi-objective/multi-criteria recommendation models;
  • Evaluation methods for multi-objective/multi-criteria recommendations;
  • Human-centric considerations in multi-objective/multi-criteria recommendations.

Multi-Objective/Multi-criteria Optimizations (MOO) for Recommender Systems

  • Effective multi-objective/multi-criteria optimization methods for RecSys;
  • Comparison of different multi-objective/multi-criteria optimization methods;
  • Novel scalarization or multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for RecSys.

Techniques from MOO/MCDM for Recommender Systems

  • The recommendation task may not be formulated as a multi-objective/multi-criteria optimization problem, but techniques or components in MOO/MCDM can be reused in the recommendation models or process.

Dr. Yong Zheng
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 1707 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Safety and Sustainability of U-Shaped Internal Staircase Projects via a Combined MCDM Approach CORST
by Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevic, Birute Juodagalviene, Ingrida Lescauskiene and Andrius Keizikas
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(1), 158; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010158 - 23 Dec 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1591
Abstract
Properly designed and installed interior stairs provide safe and convenient access to all residents of the house, including children and elderly people. While safety considerations are paramount for stair design and placement decisions in a two-storey single-family house, sustainability becomes another important factor [...] Read more.
Properly designed and installed interior stairs provide safe and convenient access to all residents of the house, including children and elderly people. While safety considerations are paramount for stair design and placement decisions in a two-storey single-family house, sustainability becomes another important factor in these deliberations. Nevertheless, safety and sustainability of the interior stairs can be seen as conflicting objectives in decision-making processes (i.e., while a larger staircase area positively affect residents’ climbing ability, it also causes higher energy consumption and material usage). Therefore, increased awareness of stair-project selection processes is required when multi-objective tasks are involved. Seven criteria affecting stair safety and sustainability in a single-family house are identified in this paper. The integrated AHP-MEREC criteria-weighting approach is proposed, to determine their weights in decision-making processes. Four different multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches, ARAS, SAW, TOPSIS and PROMETHEE, were used to determine alternative evaluations. Since the selection of the most suitable MCDM method is full of uncertainties, the novel combined-decision-making approach formally called CORST (COmbining MCDM appRoaches using method STability coefficient) is proposed in this paper. The new method stability coefficient is used to determine the stability and reliability of the specific MCDM approach. Nine U-shaped inside-staircase projects dedicated to a single-family house were evaluated, to test the effectiveness of the CORST approach. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop