applsci-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering

A special issue of Applied Sciences (ISSN 2076-3417). This special issue belongs to the section "Civil Engineering".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 April 2025 | Viewed by 9206

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
Interests: structural dynamics; structural analysis; earthquake engineering; structural control; finite element simulation; bridge engineering

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Engineering, University of Messina, 98166 Messina, Italy
Interests: performance-based seismic design; seismic isolation; earthquake engineering; innovative structural control systems; limit-state behavior of reinforced concrete structures; strengthening techniques of reinforced concrete structures
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Structural analysis and seismic resilience in civil engineering have paid significant attention to the dynamics of engineering facilities and their social and economic functions, including essential functions of buildings and infrastructures. Modern society requires that structures exhibit higher levels of resilience, especially under earthquakes. The measure of resilience can adequately reflect a city’s capacity to withstand disasters. Quantitative results of seismic resilience assessments in the pre-earthquake environment can further support emergency response planning and seismic retrofits strategies. Thus, the seismic resilience of civil structures is gaining increasing interest as a special approach that goes beyond design codes. Resilience is the ability to absorb or avoid damage without experiencing complete failure, and should be the goal of design, maintenance and restoration of buildings and infrastructures. Mitigating structural damage to infrastructure under such seismic motions remains a major challenge. The continuous development of new materials, novel analysis techniques, design concepts, and numerical analysis tools presents promising advances that could help the research community and designers overcome design and implementation challenges in creating resilient structures.

This Special Issue is focused on recent advances in structural analysis and seismic resilience within civil engineering. We welcome articles that focus on the latest developments in innovative techniques and solutions for structural analysis, seismic resilience, seismic hazard resilient structures, performance-based design, and innovative structural systems for earthquake-resilient buildings. The collection will be of interest to academics and structural and construction engineers but also architects and other professionals involved in the building and construction fields. The submission of original research studies, review papers, and experimental and/or numerical investigations focused on the structural analysis and seismic resilience of buildings and infrastructures is warmly encouraged. Both new projects/applications and interventions on existing structural systems will be of interest for the Special Issue.

Contributions on the following topics are welcome. Potential topics that fall in the scope of the research topic include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Advanced composite materials for retrofitting
  • Analysis of constructional materials under seismic loads
  • Damage detection and condition assessment
  • Damage limitation design and life-cycle sustainability
  • Innovative practices in seismic-resilient structural design
  • Innovative structural systems for damage minimization and recoverability after earthquakes
  • Integrated techniques for the seismic retrofitting and strengthening
  • New structural systems for resilient structures
  • Performance-based seismic design of structures
  • Seismic hazard and risk-mitigation measures
  • Multi-level seismic performance of critical infrastructures under design-basis earthquakes and maximum-credible earthquakes
  • Seismic resilience assessment
  • Seismic safety assessment and retrofit of existing structures
  • Seismic vulnerability assessment of structures
  • Structural health monitoring
  • Structural vibration control
  • Vibration analysis and dynamic characterization

Prof. Dr. Shehata E. Abdel Raheem
Prof. Dr. Humberto Varum
Dr. Dario De Domenico
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Applied Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

29 pages, 31313 KiB  
Article
Progressive Collapse Performance of Prefabricated Step-Terrace Frame Structures in Mountain Cities
by Youfa Yang, Zhenyu Huang and Anxu Chen
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(20), 9289; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209289 - 12 Oct 2024
Viewed by 377
Abstract
Because they have foundations with two or more different elevations, the mechanical performance of structures in mountain cities is significantly different from that of common structures. Our simulation method and the parameters of a typical bolt steel plate-based dry connection joint were verified [...] Read more.
Because they have foundations with two or more different elevations, the mechanical performance of structures in mountain cities is significantly different from that of common structures. Our simulation method and the parameters of a typical bolt steel plate-based dry connection joint were verified based on the static load test of a fully assembled substructure against progressive collapse. The load–displacement curves and the displacement–time history curves of the failure point of six kinds of column removal conditions were obtained by using static nonlinear and dynamic nonlinear analysis methods, establishing a different number of dropped stories and spans for the prefabricated step-terrace frame structure models. Based on the ultimate load amplification factor and the maximum dynamic displacement at the failure point, the progressive collapse performance of prefabricated frame structures in mountain cities, including the number of dropped stories and spans, was obtained. The results show that the progressive collapse performance of a prefabricated step-terrace frame structure is inferior to that of a common prefabricated frame structure. The progressive collapse performance is stronger when the upper ground columns fail than that when the dropped ground columns fail. The progressive collapse performance of the prefabricated step-terrace frame structure decreases gradually with the increase in the number of dropped stories and increases gradually with the increase in the number of dropped spans. With the increase in the number of dropped stories, the redundancy of the structure is reduced, and the progressive collapse performance of the dropped stories is reduced by more than that of the upper stories. The increase in the number of dropped spans increases the redundancy of the structure, and the improvement in the progressive collapse performance of the dropped stories is greater than that of the upper stories. This paper provides a reference for the progressive-collapse-resistant design of step-terrace frame structures in mountain cities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 13676 KiB  
Article
Seismic Response of Foundation Settlement for Liquid Storage Structure in Collapsible Loess Areas
by Wenji Huang, Xianhui Cao, Hongyi Xie, Haodong Sun and Xuansheng Cheng
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(19), 8993; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198993 - 6 Oct 2024
Viewed by 406
Abstract
To investigate the impact of foundation settlement in loess areas on the dynamic response of liquid storage structure (LSS) under seismic motion, a finite element analysis model of the liquid–solid coupling of LSS was established using ADINA V9.6 software. By analyzing the dynamic [...] Read more.
To investigate the impact of foundation settlement in loess areas on the dynamic response of liquid storage structure (LSS) under seismic motion, a finite element analysis model of the liquid–solid coupling of LSS was established using ADINA V9.6 software. By analyzing the dynamic response patterns of LSS under seismic motion with foundation failure, this study examines the effects of foundation failure and the direction of seismic wave incidence on the equivalent stress, maximum shear stress, wall displacement, and liquid sloshing wave height of the structure. The results indicate that among the three foundation failure scenarios, foundation failure at the center of the tank bottom has the least impact on the structural dynamic response. In contrast, foundation failure affecting one-fourth of the tank base has the greatest impact. Furthermore, compared to seismic motion along the X-axis, the dynamic response of the structure is more significantly affected when seismic motion co-occurs along the X-Z-axis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 6084 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Seismic Response in Structures: Perspectives from Non-Linear Dynamic Analysis to Pushover Analysis
by César A. Rodríguez, Ángel Mariano Rodríguez Pérez, Raúl López and Julio José Caparrós Mancera
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(6), 2504; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14062504 - 15 Mar 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1521
Abstract
This study presents a detailed comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating seismic response in structures, focusing on maximum displacements and collapse assessment. The results obtained through modal spectral analysis, non-linear dynamic analysis, and the incremental pushover analysis applied to a specific structure [...] Read more.
This study presents a detailed comparative analysis of different methods for evaluating seismic response in structures, focusing on maximum displacements and collapse assessment. The results obtained through modal spectral analysis, non-linear dynamic analysis, and the incremental pushover analysis applied to a specific structure are compared. It has been found that the choice of time step and the consideration of ductility are critical for obtaining accurate predictions. The results of the non-linear dynamic analysis of the building’s response indicate that an earthquake equivalent to the one that affected the city of Lorca (southeast Iberian Peninsula) in 2011 would have a devastating impact on the studied structure, highlighting the importance of the finite element method modelling in predicting the formation of plastic hinges and assessing structural safety. These findings highlight the importance of utilising multiple analysis approaches and detailed modelling to fully understand the seismic behaviour of structures and ensure adequate resistance and stability to extreme events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 6788 KiB  
Article
Research on Seismic Performance and Reinforcement Methods for Self-Centering Rocking Steel Bridge Piers
by Hanqing Zhuge, Chenpeng Niu, Rui Du and Zhanzhan Tang
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(16), 9108; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13169108 - 10 Aug 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1350
Abstract
To study the seismic performance of self-centering circular-section rocking steel bridge piers whose functions can be restored after an earthquake, a high-precision finite element (FE) analysis model of such a bridge piers was established. The hysteresis behavior of concrete-infilled and hollow rocking steel [...] Read more.
To study the seismic performance of self-centering circular-section rocking steel bridge piers whose functions can be restored after an earthquake, a high-precision finite element (FE) analysis model of such a bridge piers was established. The hysteresis behavior of concrete-infilled and hollow rocking steel bridge piers was compared. In response to the characteristics of the local deformation of the wall plates and elliptical deformation of the bottom surface, two reinforcement methods for the pier bottom, namely thickening the wall plate and adding longitudinal stiffeners in the plastic zone of the pier bottom, were proposed. The pseudo static analysis of bridge piers was carried out considering the effects of overall design parameters and reinforcement parameters of the pier bottom. The results indicate that the FE model used in this paper can obtain accurate horizontal load-displacement curves of rocking steel bridge piers. The hysteresis curves of the rocking steel bridge piers and infilled concrete rocking steel bridge piers is close, and directly using hollow steel bridge piers can improve the economic efficiency of the design. Compared to adding longitudinal stiffeners, the reinforcement form of thickened wall plates at the pier bottom has a better effect in improving the seismic performance of bridge piers. The reinforcement of the pier bottom has little effect on the energy dissipation capacity of the bridge pier, but it helps to reduce residual displacement and improve lateral stiffness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 11829 KiB  
Article
Seismic Response and Recentering Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Frames: A Parametric Study
by Dario De Domenico, Emanuele Gandelli and Alberto Gioitta
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(14), 8549; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148549 - 24 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1502
Abstract
The inelastic response of reinforced concrete (RC) frames under seismic loading is influenced by mechanical and geometrical properties and by the reinforcement arrangement of the beam–column members. In this paper, the seismic response and recentering behavior of RC frames is investigated numerically via [...] Read more.
The inelastic response of reinforced concrete (RC) frames under seismic loading is influenced by mechanical and geometrical properties and by the reinforcement arrangement of the beam–column members. In this paper, the seismic response and recentering behavior of RC frames is investigated numerically via cyclic pushover analysis and described by means of three synthetic behavioral indexes, namely a recentering index, a hardening index, and a ductility index. A fiber–hinge formulation is used to describe the inelastic behavior of the RC elements, and the versatile pivot hysteresis model is implemented at the material level to capture the possible pinching effects ascribed to the weak transverse reinforcement and to poor construction details that might be observed in the existing RC structures. This model is first validated against the experimental results from the literature and then applied, within a wide parametric study, to a set of 80 RC frame scenarios featured by various combinations of axial load levels and reinforcing details. As the output of this parametric study, practical design abacuses are constructed to describe the trends of the above-mentioned behavioral indexes, which are usefully related to specific mechanical and loading features of the analyzed RC frames. The reliability of the obtained results and the usefulness of the constructed abacuses in anticipating the overall cyclic behavior of a generic RC building, depending on the actual mechanical parameters of the RC sections at each story level, is finally demonstrated through a nonlinear time history analysis of an eight-story RC frame, representative of the substandard RC frames built in the 1970s in Italy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 47029 KiB  
Article
Cyclic Behaviors of Geopolymeric Recycled Brick Aggregate Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Column
by Yanbin Ni, Xiancheng Liu, Yahui Chen and Ruyue Liu
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(3), 1235; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031235 - 17 Jan 2023
Viewed by 1658
Abstract
Incorporating geopolymeric recycled brick aggregate concrete into steel tubes provides a promising solution to reduce environmental impact of construction and demolition waste. In this paper, geopolymeric recycled brick aggregate concrete-filled steel tubular column (GRBACFST) was developed to improve the environmental sustainability of composite [...] Read more.
Incorporating geopolymeric recycled brick aggregate concrete into steel tubes provides a promising solution to reduce environmental impact of construction and demolition waste. In this paper, geopolymeric recycled brick aggregate concrete-filled steel tubular column (GRBACFST) was developed to improve the environmental sustainability of composite column. Considering the replacement ratio of recycled brick aggregate (RBA), the thickness of the steel tube, type of cementitious materials and the axial compression ratio as the variation parameters, experimental research was performed to explore the cyclic behavior of GRBACFST columns, including the failure mode, bearing capacity, hysteresis curve, ductility and degradation characteristics. Results demonstrated that the failure of GRBACFST columns occurred in the region at column bottom, with the bulge of steel tube and crush of geopolymeric recycled brick aggregate concrete. The proposed GRBACFST columns exhibited favorable hysteretic behaviors with desired bearing capacity, excellent ductility, and energy dissipation behavior, which were enhanced by the increased thickness of the steel tube. The bearing capacity and ductility were reduced with the increase of axial compression ratio, while enhanced with thicker steel tube. Moreover, the degradation of stiffness and strength was more obvious under larger axial compression ratio. The increase of replacement ratio of RBA caused a significant reduction of bearing capacity, while it had few effect on the hysteretic index. It was concluded that the hysteretic behavior of proposed GRBACFST column was not sensitive to the types of cementitious material and geopolymers could serve as an eco-friendly binder for concrete. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural Analysis and Seismic Resilience in Civil Engineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop