Clinical Research on Addiction Psychiatry: Opportunities and Challenges

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Psychiatric Diseases".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 October 2024 | Viewed by 3676

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
Interests: translational addiction neuroscience
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Substance use disorder (SUD) is the nation’s most pressing unmet public health challenge. Use, dependence, and overdose were epidemics long before COVID-19, and the situation has continued to deteriorate. At least 275 million people used drugs worldwide in the last year and over 36 million people meet the criteria for drug use disorders, according to the 2021 World Drug Report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Currently, 20% of U.S. deaths are attributed to tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs; risky substance use and addiction are the largest preventable causes of death. Globally, over 11 million people are estimated to inject drugs, half of whom are living with Hepatitis C.

Opioids continue to account for the largest burden of disease attributed to drug use. Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a complex physical and emotional disease with important mood and anhedonic deficits, as well as concurrent medical and infectious disease requiring evaluation and treatment. OUD is part of the SUD spectrum. However, it is unique among other SUDs in that we have a solid understanding of the neurobiology of opioid dependence and withdrawal and have access to Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments for OUDs. The treatment for this condition is similar to existing treatments for OUD in the 1970s, with agonists like methadone and antagonists like naltrexone, along with the addition of buprenorphine a few decades ago.

Drug use changes the brain, behavior, and motivational hierarchy; the patient with OUD acquires a chronic, progressive disease that shortens life, reduces career opportunities and earning potential, increases the risks of other diseases, and often ends in death. None of the treatments that exist today are anywhere near as compelling as the drugs. Today, with almost all heroin users taking fentanyl as their primary drug of abuse, fentanyl has become highly effective at producing OUD, overdose, depression and anhedonia.

Deaths due to drug overdose had previously fallen to 2500 per year in the 1908s. The Just Say No era, from 1981 to 1989, overdoses in the USA ranged from 2500 to 5000 per year. It is hard to imagine that drug overdose deaths have increased from the time of the prescription opioid epidemic through the heroin epidemic and now the fentanyl epidemic to >120,000 per year. Despite much awareness, and dramatic increases in access, funding,  and attention to the public health threat, overdoses and for many, outcomes have been worsening with increased fentanyl, cocaine, and methamphetamine exposures. The primary approach to OUD treatment has been stagnant, focusing on existing medications that work at the opioid receptor, namely buprenorphine and naltrexone. Incredibly, some of the most common SUDs have no treatment whatsoever. The FDA has not approved treatments for cannabis, cocaine use disorder or amphetamine use disorder. 

While considerable progress has been made in developing algorithms for use in treatment in medicine, oncology or cardiology based on testing and genetics, little progress has been made in addiction medicine and addiction psychiatry in terms of personalizing treatment. Still, genes matter, especially dopamine and related genes. So too does gene expression. Developing the idea of preaddiction in a similar fashion to the important and actionable concept of prediabetes may be an interim answer. While expanding access to treatment and adopting harm reduction approaches are important in saving lives, to really reverse the concerning trends in OUD, we also need novel treatments that patients will take, and which are therefore more durable and effective. Promising potential treatments include neuromodulating modalities such as TMS and DBS, which target different areas of the neural circuitry involved in addiction. Some of these modalities are already FDA-approved for use to treat other neuropsychiatric conditions and there is evidence of effectiveness in reducing substance use, with several clinical trials in progress. In addition to neuromodulation, psychedelics have been gaining much interest due to their potential for use in treating various SUD, with mounting evidence for the use of psychedelics to treat psychiatric conditions.

Ketamine has been reported to be useful and is being actively studied in alcohol use disorders. If FDA approves psilocybin and MDMA after successful phase 3 trials, there will be reduced barriers to investigating applications of psychedelics despite their current classification as Schedule I substances. Vaccine or neuroimmune modulating approaches to treating addiction are like psychedelics, only with less evidence for their efficacy. Using agents that target pathways leading to changes in the synaptic plasticity seen in addiction can prevent addiction and/or reverse damages caused by addiction. Our primary focus is to provide research that clinical providers can use and put into context in their practices, allowing researchers to share their work and provide insights to help patients and clinicians.

We intend to solicit papers from groups developing and studying new treatments for SUDs and clinical experts treating SUDs and complex co-morbid substance use disorders today. 

Dr. Mark Gold
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cannabis use disorders
  • opioid use disorders
  • cocaine use disorders
  • substance use disorders
  • alcohol use disorders
  • treatment
  • naloxone
  • buprenorphine
  • suboxone
  • naltrexone
  • vivitrol
  • naloxone
  • dopamine
  • preaddiction
  • addiction
  • ASAM
  • aaaP
  • NIDA
  • NIAAA
  • NIMH

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

14 pages, 1816 KiB  
Article
Exercise Modifies the Brain Metabolic Response to Chronic Cocaine Exposure Inhibiting the Stria Terminalis
by Colin Hanna, Rutao Yao, Munawwar Sajjad, Mark Gold, Kenneth Blum and Panayotis K. Thanos
Brain Sci. 2023, 13(12), 1705; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13121705 - 11 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1211
Abstract
It is well known that exercise promotes health and wellness, both mentally and physiologically. It has been shown to play a protective role in many diseases, including cardiovascular, neurological, and psychiatric diseases. The present study examined the effects of aerobic exercise on brain [...] Read more.
It is well known that exercise promotes health and wellness, both mentally and physiologically. It has been shown to play a protective role in many diseases, including cardiovascular, neurological, and psychiatric diseases. The present study examined the effects of aerobic exercise on brain glucose metabolic activity in response to chronic cocaine exposure in female Lewis rats. Rats were divided into exercise and sedentary groups. Exercised rats underwent treadmill running for six weeks and were compared to the sedentary rats. Using positron emission tomography (PET) and [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), metabolic changes in distinct brain regions were observed when comparing cocaine-exposed exercised rats to cocaine-exposed sedentary rats. This included activation of the secondary visual cortex and inhibition in the cerebellum, stria terminalis, thalamus, caudate putamen, and primary somatosensory cortex. The functional network of this brain circuit is involved in sensory processing, fear and stress responses, reward/addiction, and movement. These results show that chronic exercise can alter the brain metabolic response to cocaine treatment in regions associated with emotion, behavior, and the brain reward cascade. This supports previous findings of the potential for aerobic exercise to alter the brain’s response to drugs of abuse, providing targets for future investigation. These results can provide insights into the fields of exercise neuroscience, psychiatry, and addiction research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

28 pages, 835 KiB  
Review
The Effectiveness of Mindfulness in the Treatment of Methamphetamine Addiction Symptoms: Does Neuroplasticity Play a Role?
by James Chmiel, Agnieszka Malinowska, Filip Rybakowski and Jerzy Leszek
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(4), 320; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14040320 - 27 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1056
Abstract
Introduction: Methamphetamine is a highly stimulating psychoactive drug that causes life-threatening addictions and affects millions of people around the world. Its effects on the brain are complex and include disturbances in the neurotransmitter systems and neurotoxicity. There are several known treatment methods, but [...] Read more.
Introduction: Methamphetamine is a highly stimulating psychoactive drug that causes life-threatening addictions and affects millions of people around the world. Its effects on the brain are complex and include disturbances in the neurotransmitter systems and neurotoxicity. There are several known treatment methods, but their effectiveness is moderate. It must be emphasised that no drugs have been approved for treatment. For this reason, there is an urgent need to develop new, effective, and safe treatments for methamphetamine. One of the potential treatments is mindfulness meditation. In recent years, this technique has been researched extensively in the context of many neurological and psychiatric disorders. Methods: This review explores the use of mindfulness in the treatment of methamphetamine addiction. Searches were conducted in the PubMed/Medline, Research Gate, and Cochrane databases. Results: Ten studies were identified that used mindfulness-based interventions in the treatment of methamphetamine addiction. The results show that mindfulness is an effective form of reducing hunger, risk of relapses, stress indicators, depression, and aggression, alone or in combination with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Mindfulness also improved the cognitive function in addicts. The included studies used only behavioural measures. The potential mechanisms of mindfulness in addiction were explained, and it was proposed that it can induce neuroplasticity, alleviating the symptoms of addiction. Conclusions: Evidence from the studies suggest that mindfulness may be an effective treatment option for methamphetamine addiction, used alone or in combination with tDCS. However, further high-quality research is required to establish the role of this treatment option in this field. The use of neuroimaging and neurophysiological measures is fundamental to understand the mechanisms of mindfulness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

18 pages, 432 KiB  
Systematic Review
Treatments for Cannabis Use Disorder across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review
by Mohammad Ghafouri, Sabrina Correa da Costa, Ali Zare Dehnavi, Mark S. Gold and Teresa A. Rummans
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(3), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14030227 - 28 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1168
Abstract
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a growing public health concern, with rising prevalence and significant impact on individuals across age groups. This systematic review examines 24 studies investigating pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for CUD among adolescents (up to 17), young adults (18–24), and [...] Read more.
Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is a growing public health concern, with rising prevalence and significant impact on individuals across age groups. This systematic review examines 24 studies investigating pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for CUD among adolescents (up to 17), young adults (18–24), and older adults (25–65). Database searches were conducted for randomized controlled trials of CUD interventions reporting outcomes such as cannabis use, abstinence, withdrawal symptoms, and treatment retention. For adolescents, interventions such as contingent rewards and family engagement have shown promise, while young adults benefit from technology-based platforms and peer support. In older adults, pharmacological adjuncts combined with counseling have shown promise in enhancing treatment outcomes. However, optimal treatment combinations remain uncertain, highlighting the need for further research. Addressing CUD requires tailored interventions that acknowledge developmental stages and challenges across the lifespan. Although promising interventions exist, further comparative effectiveness research is needed to delineate the most efficacious approaches. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop