Corpus Callosotomy

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (5 November 2021) | Viewed by 23793

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Child Neurology, Brain and Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
Interests: epilepsy; pediatric epilepsy; epilepsy surgery; corpus callosotomy; epileptic spasms; tuberous sclerosis; EEG analysis; seizure semiology
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu 430-8558, Japan
Interests: epilepsy; neurosurgery; pediatrics; neuroscience; adult; geriatrics; involuntary movement; tuberous sclerosis complex; brain tumor
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Corpus callosotomy is an established surgical option for palliative treatment of medically intractable epilepsy, especially for seizures with "drop attacks". At this time, the vagus nerve stimulation is compared with this intervention, and at this time, pros and cons are discussed about the intervention. However, even the words "drop attack" have not been well assessed, can we discuss the corpus callosotomy?

The procedure is also called "split brain surgery". By disconnecting the corpus callosum, one says that we make two men in one. However, one also says that the efficacy and safety of the procedure for medically intractable epilepsy to prevent injuries from the drop attack. The aim of this Special Issue is to focus on the efficacy, sequelae, so-called drop attack, and the positive and negative aspects of the corpus callosotomy.

Dr. Tohru Okanishi
Dr. Ayataka Fujimoto
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • corpus callosotomy
  • the role of corpus callosum
  • drop attack
  • spasms

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

3 pages, 184 KiB  
Editorial
Corpus Callosotomy: Editorial
by Ayataka Fujimoto and Tohru Okanishi
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(8), 1006; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12081006 - 29 Jul 2022
Viewed by 1240
Abstract
Since corpus callosotomy (CC) was first reported in 1940 [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

8 pages, 1300 KiB  
Communication
The Fornix May Play a Key Role in Korsakoff’s Amnesia Secondary to Subcallosal Artery Infarction
by Masataka Hayashi, Ayataka Fujimoto, Hideo Enoki, Keiko Niimi, Chikanori Inenaga, Keishiro Sato, Kazunari Homma, Tomoya Arakawa and Tohru Okanishi
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(1), 21; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12010021 - 24 Dec 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2480
Abstract
Background: Subcallosal artery infarction injures the fornix and anterior corpus callosum and sometimes causes Korsakoff’s amnesia. We hypothesized that Korsakoff’s amnesia might be caused by fornix dysfunction rather than anterior corpus callosum dysfunction in subcallosal artery infarction. Methods: A systematic review approach was [...] Read more.
Background: Subcallosal artery infarction injures the fornix and anterior corpus callosum and sometimes causes Korsakoff’s amnesia. We hypothesized that Korsakoff’s amnesia might be caused by fornix dysfunction rather than anterior corpus callosum dysfunction in subcallosal artery infarction. Methods: A systematic review approach was applied to search PubMed and Google Scholar for articles to compare patients who had both bilateral fornix and corpus callosum infarction due to subcallosal artery territory ischemia (vascular event group; V group) with patients who had undergone anterior corpus callosotomy (callosotomy group; C group). Results: The V group comprised 10 patients (mean age, 63 years; median, 69 years; standard deviation (SD), 14.5 years; 5 males, 5 females). The C group comprised 6 patients (mean age, 23.7 years; median, 20 years; SD, 7.3 years; 3 males, 3 females). Six of 10 patients (60%) with subcallosal artery infarction exhibited Korsakoff’s amnesia. One patient showed neither confabulation nor amnesia. Conversely, no amnesia episodes were seen in any patients from the C group (p = 0.034). Conclusion: Fornix injury, rather than anterior corpus callosum injury, might be the major cause of Korsakoff’s amnesia in patients with subcallosal artery infarction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 942 KiB  
Article
Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation following Corpus Callosotomy for Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
by Keisuke Hatano, Ayataka Fujimoto, Takamichi Yamamoto, Hideo Enoki and Tohru Okanishi
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(11), 1395; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11111395 - 23 Oct 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1635
Abstract
Objective: The effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for residual seizures after corpus callosotomy (CC) has not yet been fully investigated. We hypothesized that seizure control would be improved by VNS after CC. The purpose of this study was to compare seizure frequency [...] Read more.
Objective: The effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for residual seizures after corpus callosotomy (CC) has not yet been fully investigated. We hypothesized that seizure control would be improved by VNS after CC. The purpose of this study was to compare seizure frequency between patients with implantation of a VNS generator (post-VNS group) or without VNS (non-post-VNS group) following CC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent CC between January 2009 and May 2019 in our institution. We evaluated proportions of ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders) and seizure reduction rate 1 and 2 years after VNS. To investigate factors related to responders, uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed regarding age, number of anti-seizure medications (ASMs), addition of novel ASMs (levetiracetam, lacosamide or perampanel), and post-VNS or non-post-VNS status. Results: Thirteen post-VNS patients and 24 non-post-VNS patients were analyzed in this study. Responder rate at 1 year after VNS differed significantly between the post-VNS group (53.9%) and non-post-VNS group (12.5%, p = 0.017). Number of ASMs at the time of CC and post-VNS were significantly associated with responders in univariate analyses (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.88, p = 0.025 and OR 8.2, 95%CI 1.6–41.6, p = 0.011, respectively), whereas age, sex, seizure frequency, and addition of novel ASMs were not. In multivariate analysis, the presence of VNS procedures after CC was the only factor favorably associated with responder status (OR 82.2, 95%CI 1.55–4355.7, p = 0.03). Conclusions: VNS therapy after CC may increase the proportion of responders independent of the addition of novel ASMs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

8 pages, 2824 KiB  
Review
Surgical Aspects of Corpus Callosotomy
by Takehiro Uda, Noritsugu Kunihiro, Ryoko Umaba, Saya Koh, Toshiyuki Kawashima, Shohei Ikeda, Kotaro Ishimoto and Takeo Goto
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(12), 1608; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121608 - 5 Dec 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 6124
Abstract
Corpus callosotomy (CC) is one of the options in epilepsy surgeries to palliate patient seizures, and is typically applied for drop attacks. The mechanisms of seizure palliation involve disrupting the propagation of epileptic activity to the contralateral side of the brain. This review [...] Read more.
Corpus callosotomy (CC) is one of the options in epilepsy surgeries to palliate patient seizures, and is typically applied for drop attacks. The mechanisms of seizure palliation involve disrupting the propagation of epileptic activity to the contralateral side of the brain. This review article focuses on the surgical aspects of CC. As a variations of CC, anterior two-thirds, posterior one-third, and total callosotomy are described with intraoperative photographs. As less-invasive surgical variations, recent progress in endoscopic CC, and CC without craniotomy, is described. CC remains acceptable under the low prevalence of complications, and surgeons should make the maximum effort to minimize the complication rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2157 KiB  
Review
Corpus Callosotomy for Controlling Epileptic Spasms: A Proposal for Surgical Selection
by Tohru Okanishi and Ayataka Fujimoto
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(12), 1601; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11121601 - 1 Dec 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4206
Abstract
In 1940, van Wagenen and Herren first proposed the corpus callosotomy (CC) as a surgical procedure for epilepsy. CC has been mainly used to treat drop attacks, which are classified as generalized tonic or atonic seizures. Epileptic spasms (ESs) are a type of [...] Read more.
In 1940, van Wagenen and Herren first proposed the corpus callosotomy (CC) as a surgical procedure for epilepsy. CC has been mainly used to treat drop attacks, which are classified as generalized tonic or atonic seizures. Epileptic spasms (ESs) are a type of epileptic seizure characterized as brief muscle contractions with ictal polyphasic slow waves on an electroencephalogram and a main feature of West syndrome. Resection surgeries, including frontal/posterior disconnections and hemispherotomy, have been established for the treatment of medically intractable ES in patients with unilaterally localized epileptogenic regions. However, CC has also been adopted for ES treatment, with studies involving CC to treat ES having increased since 2010. In those studies, patients without lesions observed on magnetic resonance imaging or equally bilateral lesions predominated, in contrast to studies on resection surgeries. Here, we present a review of relevant literature concerning CC and relevant adaptations. We discuss history and adaptations of CC, and patient selection for epilepsy surgeries due to medically intractable ES, and compared resection surgeries with CC. We propose a surgical selection flow involving resection surgery or CC as first-line treatment for patients with ES who have been assessed as suitable candidates for surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

13 pages, 4168 KiB  
Case Report
Corpus Callosotomy in 3 Cavalier King Charles Spaniel Dogs with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy
by Rikako Asada, Satoshi Mizuno, Yoshihiko Yu, Yuji Hamamoto, Tetsuya Anazawa, Daisuke Ito, Masato Kitagawa and Daisuke Hasegawa
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(11), 1462; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11111462 - 4 Nov 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2706
Abstract
Corpus callosotomy (CC) is an established palliative surgery for human patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), especially those with generalized seizures and multiple or unknown epileptogenic focus. However, there are no reports to describe CC in canine patients with epilepsy. Three client-owned Cavalier King [...] Read more.
Corpus callosotomy (CC) is an established palliative surgery for human patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), especially those with generalized seizures and multiple or unknown epileptogenic focus. However, there are no reports to describe CC in canine patients with epilepsy. Three client-owned Cavalier King Charles Spaniels with DRE are included in this case series. In presurgical evaluations, an apparent epileptogenic zone was not detected in each dog and CC was conducted. Total CC was performed in one dog, whereas the other two received partial CC. One dog recovered from surgery without any complications, but died suddenly by an unknown cause at 10 h after surgery. For the other two dogs, postoperative evaluations including seizure outcomes, complications, and quality of life of the dogs and owners were assessed for at least 12 months. Both dogs showed a remarkable decrease in seizure frequency (averaged 80.3% reduction) and severity after surgery. The antiseizure medications were maintained, and not only the mentation and activity of the dogs, but also the quality of life of dogs and owners were improved postoperatively. Although technical improvement and more large-scale studies are needed, CC is a treatment option for dogs with DRE in veterinary medicine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 2876 KiB  
Case Report
Successful Hemispherotomy in a Patient with Encephalopathy with Continuous Spikes and Waves during Sleep Related to Neonatal Thalamic Hemorrhage: A Case Report with Intracranial Electroencephalogram Findings
by Shimpei Baba, Tohru Okanishi, Toshiki Nozaki, Naoki Ichikawa, Kazuki Sakakura, Mitsuyo Nishimura, Takahiro Yonekawa, Hideo Enoki and Ayataka Fujimoto
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(7), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11070827 - 22 Jun 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2211
Abstract
Neonatal thalamic hemorrhage is a strong risk factor for developing encephalopathy with continuous spikes and waves during sleep (ECSWS), even when not accompanied by widespread cortical destruction. The efficacy and indication of resective epilepsy surgery in such patients has not yet been reported. [...] Read more.
Neonatal thalamic hemorrhage is a strong risk factor for developing encephalopathy with continuous spikes and waves during sleep (ECSWS), even when not accompanied by widespread cortical destruction. The efficacy and indication of resective epilepsy surgery in such patients has not yet been reported. A 4-year-old boy was diagnosed with ECSWS based on strong epileptiform activation during sleep and neurocognitive deterioration. He had a history of left thalamic hemorrhage related to a straight sinus thrombosis during the newborn period. He presented with daily absence seizures that were refractory to medical treatment. At age 5, he underwent intracranial electroencephalogram (EEG) recording using depth and subdural strip electrodes placed in the left thalamus and over bilateral cortex, respectively. Interictal and ictal epileptiform discharges were observed in the thalamus, always preceded by discharges in the left or right parietal lobe. Left hemispherotomy successfully normalized the EEG of his unaffected hemisphere and extinguished his seizures. This is the first case report documenting resective epilepsy surgery in a patient with ECSWS due to neonatal thalamic injury without widespread cerebral destruction. Based on intracranial EEG findings, his injured thalamus did not directly generate the EEG abnormalities or absence seizures on its own. Patients with ipsilateral neonatal thalamic injury and even mild lateralized cortical changes may be candidates for resective or disconnective surgery for ECSWS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 572 KiB  
Brief Report
Postoperative Pneumocephalus on Computed Tomography Might Predict Post-Corpus Callosotomy Chemical Meningitis
by Ayataka Fujimoto, Keisuke Hatano, Toshiki Nozaki, Keishiro Sato, Hideo Enoki and Tohru Okanishi
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(5), 638; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050638 - 15 May 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1826
Abstract
Background: A corpus callosotomy (CC) is a procedure in which the corpus callosum, the largest collection of commissural fibers in the brain, is disconnected to treat epileptic seizures. The occurrence of chemical meningitis has been reported in association with this procedure. We hypothesized [...] Read more.
Background: A corpus callosotomy (CC) is a procedure in which the corpus callosum, the largest collection of commissural fibers in the brain, is disconnected to treat epileptic seizures. The occurrence of chemical meningitis has been reported in association with this procedure. We hypothesized that intraventricular pneumocephalus after CC surgery represents a risk factor for postoperative chemical meningitis. The purpose of this study was to analyze the potential risk factors for postoperative chemical meningitis in patients with medically intractable epilepsy who underwent a CC. Methods: Among the patients who underwent an anterior/total CC for medically intractable epilepsy between January 2009 and March 2021, participants were comprised of those who underwent a computed tomography scan on postoperative day 0. We statistically compared the groups with (c-Group) or without chemical meningitis (nc-Group) to determine the risk factors. Results: Of the 80 patients who underwent a CC, 65 patients (25 females and 40 males) met the inclusion criteria. Their age at the time of their CC procedure was 0–57 years. The c-Group (17%) was comprised of seven females and four males (age at the time of their CC procedure, 1–43 years), and the nc-Group (83%) was comprised of 18 females and 36 males (age at the time of their CC procedure, 0–57 years). Mann–Whitney U-tests (p = 0.002) and univariate logistic regression analysis (p = 0.001) showed a significant difference in pneumocephalus between the groups. Conclusion: Postoperative pneumocephalus identified on a computed tomography scan is a risk factor for post-CC chemical meningitis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corpus Callosotomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop