Specialized Coatings on Biomedical Materials

A special issue of Coatings (ISSN 2079-6412). This special issue belongs to the section "Bioactive Coatings and Biointerfaces".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2021) | Viewed by 2848

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1267, USA
Interests: Dental metallurgy; prosthodontic, orthodontic and endodontic materials; application of materials science principles to dental and biomedical materials; nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments; metal-ceramic systems for prosthodontics; microstructural and mechanical property characterization of dental materials; thermal analysis of dental materials; new technologies for dental materials; titanium biomedical alloys
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are seeking contributions to this Special Issue. Coatings play a prominent role in biomedical materials, enabling their use in challenging in vivo environments where these materials would not otherwise survive. Such coatings are used on implants, orthodontic wires, restorative materials, and instruments for dentistry, as well as on orthopedic implants and on other materials for a wide range of medical applications. Traditional materials science research on the composition—structure—property aspects of these coatings must be supplemented by an investigation of their performance under the harsh conditions of clinical environments, as well as by examination of retrieved materials after in vivo service. Many coatings on biomedical materials have unique features such as biologically active species and a nanostructure, which promote interactions with adjacent cells and tissue fluids. It is highly important that these coatings block the release of ions or other problematic species from the underlying substrate material.

The goals of this Special Issue are to examine the current status of special coatings on all types (metallic, ceramic, and polymeric) of biomedical materials, to provide information about advances in recent years after the previous Special Issue on this subject in 2012–2013, and to suggest directions where future research in this exciting area is needed.

The previous Special Issue on this subject in 2012–2013 was the Special Issue "Advances in Dental Biomaterials and Coatings"

https://www.mdpi.com/journal/coatings/special_issues/biomaterials_coatings

Prof. Dr. William A. Brantley
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Coatings is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Coatings
  • Dental materials
  • Orthopedic materials
  • Medical materials
  • Bioactive materials
  • Nanostructure materials.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 5882 KiB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of the Shear Bond Strength of Flowable Self-Adhering Resin-Composites Adhesive to Dentin with a Conventional Adhesive
by Abdulmajeed Ali Asiri, Rawaiz Khan, Sultan Saeed Alzahrani, Sajjad Haider, Salah Ud-Din Khan, Essa Ali Mousa Asiri, Maha Fayez Alamri, Ashfaq Ahmad and Muhammad Mubushar
Coatings 2021, 11(3), 273; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030273 - 25 Feb 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2325
Abstract
This study aimed to measure and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a self-adhering flowable resin composite to dentin with a conventional flowable composite, and evaluate the various modes of failure. Thirty human premolar teeth (n = 30) were randomly allocated [...] Read more.
This study aimed to measure and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of a self-adhering flowable resin composite to dentin with a conventional flowable composite, and evaluate the various modes of failure. Thirty human premolar teeth (n = 30) were randomly allocated to two groups (Group I: Vertise™ Flow; Group II: Filtek Ultimate + Single Bond Universal) of 15 specimens each, and SBS was measured for specimens from each group by applying a shear load using a universal testing machine (UTM). Modes of failure were observed with an optical microscope. An independent-samples T-test was performed to test Levene’s assumption of homogeneity of variance across both groups, with the critical value set at 0.05. The results revealed, that the self-adhering flowable composite (Group I: Vertise™ Flow) resulted in a lower shear bond strength compared with the conventional adhesive system composite (Group II: Filtek Ultimate + Single Bond Universal). Moreover, group I predominantly exhibited non-cohesive failure, which reflects poor bonding to dentin. On the other hand, Group II showed mixed failure for most of the samples, which demonstrated strong adhesive bonding. Therefore, it could be concluded that the self-adhering flowable resin composite (Group I) results in lower SBS to dentin compared with a conventional adhesive system. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Specialized Coatings on Biomedical Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop