energies-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass

A special issue of Energies (ISSN 1996-1073). This special issue belongs to the section "A4: Bio-Energy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 14 September 2024 | Viewed by 4637

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of the Witwatersrand, P Bag 3, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
Interests: bioethanol and biogas; bioconversion of waste food into compost; microorganisms; sustainable agriculture
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The world has, since the first industrial revolution, been overly dependent on fossil fuels, and the cumulative harm stemming from centuries-long greenhouse gas emissions into our climate is now undeniably glaring, being felt in the form of global warming and climate change. Global warming is now a lived reality the world over, with consequences ranging from run-away wildfires to floods to extreme drought conditions becoming common occurrences. Not only are fossil fuels significant contributors to global warming and climate change, but they are also non-renewable, and hence unsustainable. Consequently, there have been calls, spearheaded by some developed countries, particularly in Europe, to reduce the carbon footprint to stem the tide of global warming and climate change. These calls point to a need to significantly reduce the use of fossil fuels and switch to alternative, sustainable and climate friendly energy sources.

Research attention has fallen on biomass as an alternative. Biomass materials are classified as renewable energy (bioenergy) resources due to the fact that the carbon dioxide emitted in the processes of their combustion or thermal conversion does not increase the carbon dioxide content in the atmosphere as it is counterbalanced by the carbon dioxide intake by plants. Bioenergy can be generated from the biomass as heat, power, or biofuels (solid, liquid, or gaseous) via thermochemical or biochemical processes. The comprehensive use of low-cost, highly available and unavoidable biomass for energy generation is not only sustainable and climate friendly but will also help the world realize the twin concepts of bioeconomy and circular economy.

This Special Issue therefore calls for researchers in the domain of renewable energy, particularly those engaged with biomass, to make contributions in the form of research papers or review papers. Review articles are usually 6000-8000 words and should include at least one figure. There is no limit on the number of references included. Manuscripts must address energy development technologies from any of a range of unavoidable biomass such as wood waste, agricultural waste, food waste, municipal solid waste, and sewage sludge waste as well as liquid wastes such as commercial wastewater, industrial wastewater, residential sewage, domestics holding tank waste and runoff waste, among others. Our submission deadline is 25 February 2024. Please do notify us if you need an extension.

Dr. Timothy Sibanda
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Energies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomass
  • renewable energy
  • sustainable
  • global warming
  • pollution
  • bioeconomy

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 585 KiB  
Article
Assessing Energy Potential and Chemical Composition of Food Waste Thermodynamic Conversion Products: A Literature Review
by Andreja Škorjanc, Darko Goričanec and Danijela Urbancl
Energies 2024, 17(8), 1897; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081897 - 16 Apr 2024
Viewed by 434
Abstract
This study examines the considerable volume of food waste generated annually in Slovenia, which amounted to over 143,000 tons in 2020. The analysis shows that 40% of food waste consists of edible parts, highlighting the potential for reduction through increased consumer awareness and [...] Read more.
This study examines the considerable volume of food waste generated annually in Slovenia, which amounted to over 143,000 tons in 2020. The analysis shows that 40% of food waste consists of edible parts, highlighting the potential for reduction through increased consumer awareness and attitudes towards food consumption. The study shows that the consumption phase contributes the most to waste food (46%), followed by primary production (25%) and processing/manufacture (24%). The study addresses various thermodynamic processes, in particular, thermal conversion methods, such as torrefaction pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization, which optimize energy potential by reducing the atomic ratio (H/C) and (O/C), thereby increasing calorific value and facilitating the production of solid fuels. The main results show the effectiveness of torrefaction, pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) in increasing the energy potential of food waste. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 10921 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Aluminosilicate Additives upon the Chlorine Distribution and Melting Behavior of Poultry Litter Ash
by Izabella Maj, Kamil Niesporek, Krzysztof Matus, Francesco Miccio, Mauro Mazzocchi and Paweł Łój
Energies 2024, 17(8), 1854; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081854 - 12 Apr 2024
Viewed by 439
Abstract
The use of poultry litter (PL) as a sustainable fuel is gaining more attention due to its wide availability and carbon neutrality. However, this type of feedstock is rich in ash and typically contains a high concentration of chlorine (Cl) and alkali elements [...] Read more.
The use of poultry litter (PL) as a sustainable fuel is gaining more attention due to its wide availability and carbon neutrality. However, this type of feedstock is rich in ash and typically contains a high concentration of chlorine (Cl) and alkali elements (Na, K). Therefore, it is likely to cause unwanted issues during combustion and co-combustion, such as chlorine-induced corrosion, ash deposition, and bed agglomeration. In this study, for the first time, the influence of aluminosilicate additives on the above problems of poultry litter was investigated. Three aluminosilicate minerals are under consideration: kaolin, halloysite, and bentonite. Their influence on the chemical composition and meting tendencies of two poultry litter ashes are determined. The investigated ashes, PL1 and PL2, are characterized by different chlorine contents of 6.38% and 0.42%, respectively. The results show that in the case of the chlorine-rich PL1 ash, the additives reduced the chlorine content by up to 45%, resulting in a 3.93% of chlorine in the case of halloysite, 3.48% in the case of kaolin, and 4.25% in the case of bentonite. The additives also positively influenced the shrinkage starting temperature and the deformation temperature of the PL1 ash. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4213 KiB  
Article
Possibilities of Utilising Biomass Collected from Road Verges to Produce Biogas and Biodiesel
by Robert Czubaszek, Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek, Aneta Sienkiewicz, Alicja Piotrowska-Niczyporuk, Martin J. Wassen and Andrzej Bajguz
Energies 2024, 17(7), 1751; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071751 - 5 Apr 2024
Viewed by 737
Abstract
Grass collected as part of roadside maintenance is conventionally subjected to composting, which has the disadvantage of generating significant CO2 emissions. Thus, it is crucial to find an alternative method for the utilisation of grass waste. The aim of this study was [...] Read more.
Grass collected as part of roadside maintenance is conventionally subjected to composting, which has the disadvantage of generating significant CO2 emissions. Thus, it is crucial to find an alternative method for the utilisation of grass waste. The aim of this study was to determine the specific biogas yield (SBY) from the anaerobic mono-digestion of grass from road verges and to assess the content of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAMEs) in grass in relation to the time of cutting and the preservation method of the studied material. The biochemical biogas potential (BBP) test and the FAMEs content were performed on fresh and ensiled grass collected in spring, summer, and autumn. The highest biogas production was obtained from fresh grass cut in spring (715.05 ± 26.43 NL kgVS−1), while the minimum SBY was observed for fresh grass cut in summer (540.19 ± 24.32 NL kgVS−1). The methane (CH4) content in the biogas ranged between 55.0 ± 2.0% and 60.0 ± 1.0%. The contents of ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in biogas remained below the threshold values for these inhibitors. The highest level of total FAMEs was determined in fresh grass cut in autumn (98.08 ± 19.25 mg gDM−1), while the lowest level was detected in fresh grass cut in spring (56.37 ± 7.03 mg gDM−1). C16:0 and C18:0, which are ideal for biofuel production, were present in the largest amount (66.87 ± 15.56 mg gDM−1) in fresh grass cut in autumn. The ensiling process significantly impacted the content of total FAMEs in spring grass, leading to a reduction in total saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and an increase in total unsaturated fatty acids (USFAs). We conclude that grass biomass collected during the maintenance of road verges is a valuable feedstock for the production of both liquid and gaseous biofuels; however, generating energy from biogas appears to be more efficient than producing biodiesel. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3890 KiB  
Article
Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Production from Solid Waste Valorization and Wastewater Purification: A Case Study of Meat Processing Industry
by Christos Boukouvalas, Tryfon Kekes, Vasiliki Oikonomopoulou and Magdalini Krokida
Energies 2024, 17(2), 487; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17020487 - 19 Jan 2024
Viewed by 682
Abstract
The meat processing industry is a very energy-intensive and water-demanding industry that produces large amounts of solid and aqueous wastes. Therefore, methods for the effective treatment of the produced wastes have been studied in order to treat and reuse water within the industry [...] Read more.
The meat processing industry is a very energy-intensive and water-demanding industry that produces large amounts of solid and aqueous wastes. Therefore, methods for the effective treatment of the produced wastes have been studied in order to treat and reuse water within the industry and valorize the solid wastes for the production of energy and value-added products. The primary aim of this work is to evaluate the overall sustainability of energy produced from solid waste valorization and wastewater treatment in the meat processing industry via Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). For this purpose, the total environmental impact of a typical meat industry that utilizes conventional waste management methods (Scenario A) was evaluated and compared with two different industries with appropriate waste treatment/valorization processes. In the first studied valorization scenario (Scenario B), waste management is conducted using anaerobic digestion, composting, membrane bioreactors, and ultraviolet (UV) treatment, whereas in the second studied valorization scenario (Scenario C), aeration treatment, chlorination, and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) are the selected treatment techniques. As expected, it is evident from this LCA study, that both Scenarios B and C exhibited a significantly improved environmental footprint in all studied indicators compared with Scenario A, with the reduction in certain environmental impact categories reaching up to 80%. Between the two studied alternative scenarios, the biggest improvement in the environmental footprint of the meat industry was observed in Scenario C, mainly due to the substantial quantity of the produced thermal energy. According to the results of the present case study, it is evident that the incorporation of appropriate methods in the meat industry can result in the efficient generation of energy and a significant improvement in the environmental footprint contributing to environmental safety and sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4361 KiB  
Article
Effect of Ash from Salix viminalis on the Biomass and Heating Value of Zea mays and on the Biochemical and Physicochemical Properties of Soils
by Edyta Boros-Lajszner, Jadwiga Wyszkowska and Jan Kucharski
Energies 2023, 16(24), 8037; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16248037 - 13 Dec 2023
Viewed by 537
Abstract
Wood ash is sometimes used as an alternative to mineral fertilizers; however, there is still a paucity of reliable data concerning its effect on plants—and on biological properties of soil. The present study aimed to determine the possible extent of soil pollution with [...] Read more.
Wood ash is sometimes used as an alternative to mineral fertilizers; however, there is still a paucity of reliable data concerning its effect on plants—and on biological properties of soil. The present study aimed to determine the possible extent of soil pollution with ash from Salix viminalis that does not disturb the growth of Zea mays L., intended for energetic purposes, in order to identify how the increasing ash doses affect biochemical and physicochemical properties of soil and to finally to establish the neutralizing effects of soil additives, i.e., compost and HumiAgra preparation, on this soil pollutant. The study demonstrated that the heating value of Zea mays L. was stable and not modified by the excess content of ash from Salix viminalis in the soil. This finding points to the feasibility of Zea mays L. cultivation on soils contaminated with ash from Salix viminalis and its use in bio-power engineering. The biomass of the aboveground parts of Zea mays L. was significantly reduced after soil contamination with Salix viminalis ash dose of 20 g kg−1 d.m. soil, whereas the smaller ash doses tested (5–10 g kg−1 d.m. soil) did not impair either the growth or the development of Zea mays L. The ash inhibited activities of all analyzed soil enzymes but increased soil pH and sorption capacity. Fertilization with compost proved more effective in neutralizing the adverse effect of ash on enzymatic activity of the soil. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2233 KiB  
Article
Calorific Value Prediction Model Using Structure Composition of Heat-Treated Lignocellulosic Biomass
by Sunyong Park, Seon Yeop Kim, Ha Eun Kim, Kwang Cheol Oh, Seok Jun Kim, La Hoon Cho, Young Kwang Jeon and DaeHyun Kim
Energies 2023, 16(23), 7896; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16237896 - 3 Dec 2023
Viewed by 922
Abstract
This study aims to identify an equation for predicting the calorific value for heat-treated biomass using structural analysis. Different models were constructed using 129 samples of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and calorific values obtained from previous studies. These models were validated using 41 [...] Read more.
This study aims to identify an equation for predicting the calorific value for heat-treated biomass using structural analysis. Different models were constructed using 129 samples of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and calorific values obtained from previous studies. These models were validated using 41 additional datasets, and an optimal model was identified using its results and following performance metrics: the coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error (MAE), root-mean-squared error (RMSE), average absolute error (AAE), and average bias error (ABE). Finally, the model was verified using 25 additional data points. For the overall dataset, R2 was ~0.52, and the RMSE range was 1.46–1.77. For woody biomass, the R2 range was 0.78–0.83, and the RMSE range was 0.9626–1.2810. For herbaceous biomass, the R2 range was 0.5251–0.6001, and the RMSE range was 1.1822–1.3957. The validation results showed similar or slightly poorer performances. The optimal model was then tested using the test data. For overall biomass and woody biomass, the performance metrics of the obtained model were superior to those in previous studies, whereas for herbaceous biomass, lower performance metrics were observed. The identified model demonstrated equal or superior performance compared to linear models. Further improvements are required based on a wider range of structural biomass data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 1656 KiB  
Review
Animal Manure as an Alternative Bioenergy Resource in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Present Insights, Challenges, and Prospects for Future Advancements
by Timothy Sibanda and Jean Damascene Uzabakiriho
Energies 2024, 17(8), 1839; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081839 - 11 Apr 2024
Viewed by 471
Abstract
Energy availability is a pivotal driver in fostering sustainable socio-economic development. However, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) grapples with paradoxes headlined by abundant energy resources but with the world’s lowest access to clean energy index per capita. Faced with a lack of access to clean [...] Read more.
Energy availability is a pivotal driver in fostering sustainable socio-economic development. However, sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) grapples with paradoxes headlined by abundant energy resources but with the world’s lowest access to clean energy index per capita. Faced with a lack of access to clean energy sources like electricity, rural areas in the majority of SSA countries almost exclusively depend on biomass-fuels, mostly fuelwood, leading to heightened respiratory health risks as well as environmental degradation and accelerated climate change. As an alternative, this review investigates the potential of animal manure as a sustainable energy resource for rural SSA households, emphasising its utilisation as a feedstock for biogas production using anaerobic digestor technology. Results show that despite the abundance of literature that reports on successes in lab-scale bioreactor optimisation, as well as successes in the initial rollout of biogas biodigester technology in SSA with the help of international collaborators, the actual uptake of biogas bioreactor technology by rural communities remains low, while installed bioreactors are experiencing high failure rates. Resultantly, rural SSA still lags significantly behind in the adoption of sustainable clean energy systems in comparison to rural communities in other regions. Among some of the hurdles identified as driving low technology assimilation are onerous policy requirements, low-level government involvement, high bioreactor-instalment costs, the lack of training and awareness, and water scarcity. Prospects for success lie in innovative technologies like the low-cost portable FlexiBiogas system and private–public partnerships, as well as flexible energy policy frameworks. Bridging the knowledge-implementation gap requires a holistic approach considering cultural, technological, and policy aspects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Development in Liquid Waste and Biomass)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop