energies-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage

A special issue of Energies (ISSN 1996-1073). This special issue belongs to the section "B3: Carbon Emission and Utilization".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 February 2023) | Viewed by 15927

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Computing, Engineering & Digital Technologies, Teesside University, Middlesbrough TS1 3BX, UK
Interests: pre- and post combustion carbon capture, direct air carbon capture, modelling of carbon capture systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia
Interests: membrane technology; gas separation membranes; water treatment through membrane; material development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the largest global greenhouse gas emitted to the atmosphere and is therefore a prime driver of climate change. Bringing us to the precipice of the climate emergency, levels of atmospheric CO2 have shown a sustained rise over the past 30 years, despite efforts to curb emissions. If levels of atmospheric CO2 continue to rise, the increase in average global temperature will overshoot the 2oC limit established by the Paris Agreement. This will have adverse effects on ecosystems and the services and livelihoods they sustain.

Nations worldwide have set an ambitious target of achieving net zero-carbon emissions by 2050, which can only be achieved through a broad suite of technologies. Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) is a suite of emerging technologies targeted at mitigating climate change. Without them, achieving a net-zero scenario is impossible, as they offer a reduction in new emissions from key sectors and remove CO2 from the air to balance emissions.

The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) “Energy Technology Perspectives 2020 report” emphasises that CCUS must be one of the key pillars of the global energy transition. By combining it with bioenergy or capturing CO2 directly from air, CCUS can potentially generate negative emissions. A lot of research is being performed in these technology sectors and many potential technologies are under pilot study or near commercialisation.

This Special Issue explores and promotes research and applications in the field of CCUS to achieve carbon neutral processes, clean energy development, safe storage methods and climate change mitigation at large.

Potential topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Pre- and post-combustion carbon capture from the chemical process industry—technologies and methodologies;
  • Carbon capture and storage applications in power generation;
  • Direct air carbon capture;
  • CO2 transmission in pipelines;
  • Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage;
  • Negative emissions technologies;
  • The thermal, electrochemical, and photochemical conversion of CO2 into fuels and chemicals;
  • The biological utilisation of CO2 into value-added products;
  • The CO2 mineralisation into inorganic materials;
  • System optimisation, digital twins, and decision-making models;
  • Techno-economic feasibility and life-cycle analysis evaluation of CCUS;
  • Risk assessment, intelligent monitoring, advanced sensors, and process control of CCUS processes;
  • Supply chain, economics, social factors, governmental policies, and regulations regarding CCUS applications.

Dr. Humbul Suleman
Dr. Rizwan Nasir
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Energies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  •  Carbon capture
  •  Carbon storage
  •  Carbon utilisation
  •  Net-zero emissions
  •  Carbon neutral process
  •  Clean energy
  •  Low carbon
  •  CO2 economy
  •  Energy transition
  •  Negative carbon emissions
  •  Future energy systems
  •  CO2 sequestration
  •  CCUS plants
  •  Power to X

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 9198 KiB  
Article
Design and Analysis of Novel CO2 Conditioning Process in Ship-Based CCS
by Wentao Gong, Eryk Remiezowicz, Philip Loldrup Fosbøl and Nicolas von Solms
Energies 2022, 15(16), 5928; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15165928 - 16 Aug 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1717
Abstract
In this work, CO2 conditioning processes for ship-based CCS sequestration are modelled using the software APSEN HYSYS V11. This study uses the captured CO2 gas from the 3D project as the feed. The feed stream contains water, H2S, and [...] Read more.
In this work, CO2 conditioning processes for ship-based CCS sequestration are modelled using the software APSEN HYSYS V11. This study uses the captured CO2 gas from the 3D project as the feed. The feed stream contains water, H2S, and CO as contaminants. The purification processes for dehydration, desulfurization, and CO removal are reviewed. Two liquefaction approaches, the open-cycle and the closed-cycle liquefaction, are modelled and compared for transport pressures 7 and 15 bar. It is found that the energy requirement of the open-cycle process is higher than that of the closed-cycle liquefaction process. For the closed-cycle design, two refrigerants, ammonia and propane, are considered. Results show that the energy requirement of the process using ammonia is lower than that of propane. When comparing the two transport pressures, it is found that liquefaction at 15 bar requires less energy than 7 bar. On top of that, both refrigerants are unsuited for the liquefaction of CO2 at 7 bar, as their operating pressures are below 1 atm. Several optimization concepts are tested on the closed-cycle liquefaction design. The net power consumption of the closed-cycle liquefaction is reduced when CO2 is precooled using the intermediate pressure ammonia streams and the cold from the CO stripper. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 6618 KiB  
Article
Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) Containing Adsorbents for Carbon Capture
by Linda Ansone-Bertina, Viesturs Ozols, Lauris Arbidans, Linda Dobkevica, Kristaps Sarsuns, Edgars Vanags and Maris Klavins
Energies 2022, 15(9), 3473; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093473 - 9 May 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3413
Abstract
In this study, new composite materials of montmorillonite, biochar, or aerosil, containing metal–organic frameworks (MOF) were synthesized in situ. Overall, three different MOFs—CuBTC, UTSA-16, and UiO-66-BTEC—were used. Obtained adsorbents were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, nitrogen adsorption porosimetry, scanning electron microscopy, [...] Read more.
In this study, new composite materials of montmorillonite, biochar, or aerosil, containing metal–organic frameworks (MOF) were synthesized in situ. Overall, three different MOFs—CuBTC, UTSA-16, and UiO-66-BTEC—were used. Obtained adsorbents were characterized using powder X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, nitrogen adsorption porosimetry, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometry. Additionally, the content of metallic and nonmetallic elements was determined to investigate the crystalline structure, surface morphology, thermal stability of the obtained MOF-composites, etc. Cyclic CO2 adsorption analysis was performed using the thermogravimetric approach, modeling adsorption from flue gasses. In our study, the addition of aerosil to CuBTC (CuBTC-A-15) enhanced the sorbed CO2 amount by 90.2% and the addition of biochar (CuBTC-BC-5) increased adsorbed the CO2 amount by 75.5% in comparison to pristine CuBTC obtained in this study. Moreover, the addition of montmorillonite (CuBTC-Mt-15) increased the adsorbed amount of CO2 by 27%. CuBTC-A-15 and CuBTC-BC-5 are considered to be the most perspective adsorbents, capturing 3.7 mmol/g CO2 and showing good stability after 20 adsorption-desorption cycles. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

31 pages, 16839 KiB  
Review
Recent Advances in the Synthesis, Application and Economic Feasibility of Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents for CO2 Capture: A Review
by Syed Awais Ali, Waqad Ul Mulk, Zahoor Ullah, Haris Khan, Afrah Zahid, Mansoor Ul Hassan Shah and Syed Nasir Shah
Energies 2022, 15(23), 9098; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15239098 - 30 Nov 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 3190
Abstract
Global warming is one of the major problems in the developing world, and one of the major causes of global warming is the generation of carbon dioxide (CO2) because of the burning of fossil fuels. Burning fossil fuels to meet the [...] Read more.
Global warming is one of the major problems in the developing world, and one of the major causes of global warming is the generation of carbon dioxide (CO2) because of the burning of fossil fuels. Burning fossil fuels to meet the energy demand of households and industries is unavoidable. The current commercial and experimental techniques used for capturing and storing CO2 have serious operational and environmental constraints. The amine-based absorption technique for CO2 capture has a low absorption and desorption ratio, and the volatile and corrosive nature of the solvent further complicates the situation. To overcome all of these problems, researchers have used ionic liquids (ILs) and deep eutectic solvents (DESs) as a replacement for commercial amine-based solvents. ILs and deep eutectic solvents are tunable solvents that have a very low vapor pressure, thus making them an ideal medium for CO2 capture. Moreover, most ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents have low toxicity and can be recycled without a significant loss in their CO2 capture capability. This paper first gives a brief overview of the ILs and DESs used for CO2 capture, followed by the functionalization of ILs to enhance CO2 capture. Moreover, it provides details on the conversion of CO2 into different valuable products using ILs and DESs, along with an economic perspective on using both of these solvents for CO2 capture. Furthermore, it provides insight into the difficulties and drawbacks that are faced by industries when using ILs and DESs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

0 pages, 9739 KiB  
Review
RETRACTED: Gas Hydrate-Based CO2 Capture: A Journey from Batch to Continuous
by Adeel ur Rehman and Bhajan Lal
Energies 2022, 15(21), 8309; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218309 - 7 Nov 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3983 | Retraction
Abstract
Future carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) will be impacted by the new scenario in which the energy supply rapidly shifts from oil-based to natural gas-based means, but this shift also presents an opportunity to utilize natural gas hydrates (NGHs). This review discusses [...] Read more.
Future carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) will be impacted by the new scenario in which the energy supply rapidly shifts from oil-based to natural gas-based means, but this shift also presents an opportunity to utilize natural gas hydrates (NGHs). This review discusses the present state of CCS research and development, the advantages of the various approaches, and the barriers to commercialization that exist today. It also provides an evaluation of certain practical small- and large-scale CCS applications. The high initial investment, as well as ongoing maintenance costs, plague today’s commercially accessible CO2 capture technologies, including absorption, adsorption, membranes, and cryogenic separation. Gas hydrate-based capture has the potential to become the dominant method for CO2 separation because of the high recovery rates and purity it provides. Hydrate-based technologies, including CO2 capture, CO2 separation, and transportation, can also be used to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and have excellent application potential. Despite this, the potential of technology based on gas hydrates to help reduce the effects of climate change in the future has received little attention. This study discusses cosmopolitan energy provision and environmental challenges and conversions, and the role of gas hydrates in the carbon cycle. This paper summarizes the state-of-the-art developments in hydrate-based reactors, thereby providing a perspective on the roles of NGHs in the future energy supply and climate change mitigation. In all these areas, we focus on identifying future CCS challenges and the technological development risk in gas hydrate-based systems, which should be highlighted in the next several decades. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3568 KiB  
Review
Carbon Capture and Utilization: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2007–2021
by Muhammad Nawaz, Humbul Suleman and Abdulhalim Shah Maulud
Energies 2022, 15(18), 6611; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186611 - 9 Sep 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2299
Abstract
It is widely accepted that carbon capture and utilization technologies are an effective way of lowering the amount of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere. A bibliometric analysis is presented in this article to investigate the development of carbon capture and utilization. The [...] Read more.
It is widely accepted that carbon capture and utilization technologies are an effective way of lowering the amount of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere. A bibliometric analysis is presented in this article to investigate the development of carbon capture and utilization. The study was conducted to identify the trends in publishing, dominant contributing authors, institutions, countries, potential publishing sources, and the most cited publications in this research area. A total of 4204 articles published between 2007 and 2021 were analyzed, covering 13,272 authors, 727 journals, and 88 countries. The findings indicate that the most productive and influential authors have British and American affiliations. The United States, the United Kingdom, and China have conducted most studies on the aforementioned topic. Imperial College London, United Kingdom, has the highest number of publications in this field of research. Furthermore, the collaborative analysis was developed by creating links between the keywords, published information, authors, institutions, and countries. In addition, the discussion highlights the tremendous development in the research area of carbon capture and utilization, especially with a focus on the exponential rise in the number of yearly publications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop