Cellulose Degradation, Lignocellulose Conversion to Second-Generation Biofuels

A special issue of Fermentation (ISSN 2311-5637). This special issue belongs to the section "Industrial Fermentation".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 13977

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Ul. Oczapowskiego 8, 10-519 Olsztyn, Poland
Interests: agricultural waste management; cellulose; organic waste; waste valorization; soil amendments
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Professor Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology, Ul. Rakowiecka 36, 02-532 Warszawa, Poland
Interests: sugar beet; digestive juice; fermentation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

With the continued pace of world economic growth, sustainable socioeconomic development will depend upon a supply of stock material inputs for agriculture, industry, and energy. Nowadays’ strong reliance on nonrenewable resources—especially fossil fuels—is constrained by economic, political, and environmental factors. The reliance on nonrenewable resources is accompanied by a heavy reliance on chemical and thermochemical processes; it is worth mentioning that the role of biological processes in the global economy is small, but growing fast.

The fermentation of sugar-based raw materials is referred to as “first-generation” bioethanol, whereas the use of lignocellulose raw materials is commonly called “second-generation” bioethanol.

Current technologies of biofuels are based on the transformation of glucose-based carbohydrates into bioethanol and vegetable oils into biodiesel fuel. At present, the main sources of carbohydrates for the fermentation into bioethanol are juices of sugarcane and sugar beet, as well as starches of corn, wheat, potatoes, and some other agricultural plants. For example, in Brazil 100% of ethanol is produced from the juice of sugarcane, and in the United States approximately 85% of the total ethanol production relies on corn grains. Therefore, the currently implemented “mature” technologies for the production of liquid biofuels are based on the transformation of food-grade carbohydrates into bioethanol. This approach results in a strong competition for agricultural land, which can cause the excessive consumption of water, an increase in food and feed prices, and even their deficits. Therefore, an alternative way to produce biofuels without competing with the food and feed industry is through the extensive and effective use of nonedible biomass, which involves softwood, forest residues, agricultural residues, as well as end or byproducts of the pulp and paper industry, etc. 

“Second-generation” bioethanol, with lignocellulose material as the feedstock, is a promising alternative to first-generation bioethanol.

A key chemical in the whole technology of second-generation fuel is undoubtedly cellulose, which is considered as the most widespread polymer that is endlessly renewable in nature. This polysaccharide is present in all plants and algae. It consists of long chains of β-glucose monomers gathered into microfibril bundles. Its special and complicated structure makes cellulose resistant to both biological and chemical treatments. Since lignocellulosic materials are very complicated, their pretreatment and saccharification are not simple either.

Once the lignocellulosic biomass is pretreated and hydrolysed, the released sugars can be fermented and the downstream process is similar to that of first-generation biofuels. Due to its dense structure, the barrier properties of lignin, and the nonproductive sorption of cellulolytic enzymes by hemicelluloses, the initial lignocellulosic biomass is highly recalcitrant to enzymatic hydrolysis. Therefore, some kind of pretreatment is usually applied to make the biomass more accessible to enzymes.

The major barriers for the commercialization of second-generation ethanol production are the high costs of the pretreatment, the enzymes used in the hydrolysis, and the conversion of 5C sugars into ethanol.

The first stage of this technology is the hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose. Such hydrolysis can be performed both by acids or cellulolytic enzymes. Enzymatic hydrolysis is preferable because this process is carried out at moderate temperatures and gives an increased yield of the sugar. The main objectives of the pretreatment are to loosen the physical structure of the biomass and eliminate noncellulosic components (lignin and hemicelluloses) in order to increase accessibility and the percentage of the cellulose fraction.

Therefore, the specific goal of this Special Issue is to publish both recent innovative research results and review papers on the problem of cellulose conversion into second-generation biofuels. Research papers are welcome, but if you would like to contribute a review paper please contact one of the editors to discuss the topic’s relevance before submitting the manuscript.

Dr. Andrzej Klasa
Dr. Andrzej Baryga
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Fermentation is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cellulose pretreatment
  • use of cellulolytic enzymes
  • enzymatic pretreatment of biomass
  • second-generation biofuels from waste biomass

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

21 pages, 2726 KiB  
Article
Impact of Natural Degradation on the Aged Lignocellulose Fibers of Moroccan Cedar Softwood: Structural Elucidation by Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
by Yousra Bouramdane, Somia Fellak, Fouad El Mansouri and Abdellatif Boukir
Fermentation 2022, 8(12), 698; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120698 - 1 Dec 2022
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4161
Abstract
The aims of this study are to investigate the structure of four historical Moroccan cedar softwood samples of different aging time duration (16th, 17th, 19th, 21st centuries) and compare among these four samples, using two analytical methods, FTIR and XRD, in order to [...] Read more.
The aims of this study are to investigate the structure of four historical Moroccan cedar softwood samples of different aging time duration (16th, 17th, 19th, 21st centuries) and compare among these four samples, using two analytical methods, FTIR and XRD, in order to confirm some structural changes and determine the degree of deterioration. The pronounced hemicellulose deterioration was highlighted by a breakdown of IR acetyl groups at 1738 cm−1 from the 19th century sample until aged ones. The cellulose XRD crystallinity index showed an important decrease from recent to oldest samples (51.8 to 20.2%) justifying the damages mainly in the two oldest samples (17th and 16th centuries), also confirmed by FTIR. The alteration of lignin was manifested in the case of the two ancient samples (16th and 17th centuries), proven by the decrease in IR bands related to aromatic nuclei (1595, 1500, 1230 cm−1) evolving towards a new diconjugate C=O formers at 1647 cm−1 (quinone, Ar-CO-Ar, Ar-CO-C=C). For accurate elucidation, the data of two combined techniques were compared and correlated. The obtained results depended on the part of the wood exposed to weathering effects (internal or external) and were influenced by both extended time of aging and effects of natural deterioration agents. The effects of natural aging were investigated in four historical Moroccan cedar softwood samples (16th, 17th, 19th, 21st centuries) using two analytical tools: FTIR and XRD. The pronounced hemicellulose deterioration was highlighted by a breakdown of IR acetyl groups at 1738 cm−1 and declines in the absorption signal at 1268 cm−1 from the 19th century sample until aged ones. The cellulose XRD crystallinity index (CrI) estimation showed an important decrease from recent to oldest samples (51.8 to 20.2%) justifying the damages mainly in the two oldest samples (17th and 16th centuries). These data were also confirmed by FTIR showing a significant reduction in both area profiles of C-O-C (1150–1000 cm−1) and C-H crystalline cellulosic bands (1375, 1318, and 1268 cm−1), respectively. The lignin alteration in both old samples (16th and 17th centuries) was proven by the decrease in IR aromatic skeleton (1595, 1500, and 1230 cm−1) evolving towards a new diconjugate C=O formers at 1647 cm−1 (quinone, Ar-CO-Ar, Ar-CO-C=C). To determine the structural difference and the degree of deterioration, the IR area of C=O band intensities ranging from 1550 to 1800 cm−1 was exploited. For accurate elucidation, the data of two combined techniques were compared and correlated. The obtained results depended on the part of the wood (internal or external) exposed to weathering effects and were influenced by both extended time of aging and effects of natural deterioration agents. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5870 KiB  
Article
Valorization of Bombax ceiba Waste into Bioethanol Production through Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation and Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation
by Misbah Ghazanfar, Muhammad Nadeem, Hafiz Abdullah Shakir, Muhammad Khan, Irfan Ahmad, Marcelo Franco, Lijing Chen and Muhammad Irfan
Fermentation 2022, 8(8), 386; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8080386 - 12 Aug 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 5330
Abstract
In this study, Seed pods of B. ceiba were used as a novel, cheap, and sustainable feedstock for second-generation bioethanol production. B. ceiba waste was pretreated with NaOH under different conditions using a Box–Behnken design (BBD) with three factors and three levels. Fourier [...] Read more.
In this study, Seed pods of B. ceiba were used as a novel, cheap, and sustainable feedstock for second-generation bioethanol production. B. ceiba waste was pretreated with NaOH under different conditions using a Box–Behnken design (BBD) with three factors and three levels. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to investigate the chemical, structural, and morphological modifications made by pretreatment. NaOH pretreatment followed by steam was more effective as it offered 60% cellulose and 9% lignin at 10% substrate loading, 5% NaOH conc., and 4 h residence time. Samples with maximum cellulose were employed for ethanol production by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) using indigenously produced cellulase as well as commercial cellulase. HPLC analysis revealed the best saccharification (50.9%) at 24 h and the best ethanol yield (54.51 g/L) at 96 h of fermentation in SSF using commercial cellulose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. SSF offered a better production of bioethanol from seed pods than SHF. The implications of the work support the notion that B. ceiba waste could be utilized for large-scale bioethanol production. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 1491 KiB  
Review
Integrating 1G with 2G Bioethanol Production by Using Distillers’ Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) as the Feedstock for Lignocellulolytic Enzyme Production
by Attia Iram, Deniz Cekmecelioglu and Ali Demirci
Fermentation 2022, 8(12), 705; https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120705 - 3 Dec 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3801
Abstract
First-generation (1G) bioethanol is one of the most used liquid biofuels in the transport industry. It is generated by using sugar- or starch-based feedstocks, while second-generation (2G) bioethanol is generated by using lignocellulosic feedstocks. Distillers’ dried grains with solubles (DDGS) is a byproduct [...] Read more.
First-generation (1G) bioethanol is one of the most used liquid biofuels in the transport industry. It is generated by using sugar- or starch-based feedstocks, while second-generation (2G) bioethanol is generated by using lignocellulosic feedstocks. Distillers’ dried grains with solubles (DDGS) is a byproduct of first-generation bioethanol production with a current annual production of 22.6 million tons in the USA. DDGS is rich in fiber and valuable nutrients contents, which can be used to produce lignocellulolytic enzymes such as cellulases and hemicellulases for 2G bioethanol production. However, DDGS needs a pretreatment method such as dilute acid, ammonia soaking, or steam hydrolysis to release monosaccharides and short-length oligosaccharides as fermentable sugars for use in microbial media. These fermentable sugars can then induce microbial growth and enzyme production compared to only glucose or xylose in the media. In addition, selection of one or more suitable microbial strains, which work best with the DDGS for enzyme production, is also needed. Media optimization and fermentation process optimization strategies can then be applied to find the optimum conditions for the production of cellulases and hemicellulases needed for 2G bioethanol production. Therefore, in this review, a summary of all such techniques is compiled with a special focus on recent findings obtained in previous pieces of research conducted by the authors and by others in the literature. Furthermore, a comparison of such techniques applied to other feedstocks and process improvement strategies is also provided. Overall, dilute acid pretreatment is proven to be better than other pretreatment methods, and fermentation optimization strategies can enhance enzyme production by considerable folds with a suitable feedstock such as DDGS. Future studies can be further enhanced by the technoeconomic viability of DDGS as the on-site enzyme feedstock for the manufacture of second-generation bioethanol (2G) in first-generation (1G) ethanol plants, thus bridging the two processes for the efficient production of bioethanol using corn or other starch-based lignocellulosic plants. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop