Liberating Gender and Race from Coloniality’s Prescriptive Normativity

A special issue of Genealogy (ISSN 2313-5778).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2023) | Viewed by 2682

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, New York, NY 10035, USA
Interests: spirituality; African American church; organizational development; African American history; social work education; coloniality; intersectionality

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Silberman School of Social Work, Hunter College, New York, NY 10035, USA
Interests: spirituality; African American church; organizational development; African American history; social work education; coloniality; intersectionality

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

“There is no thing as a single-issue struggle because we do not live single-issue lives.” ---Audre Lorde

Collectively, the murders of Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, and 44 trans women in one year and the disappearance of Native women have impacted the discourse on race and gender in the United States. Coloniality, and its critique of hierarchies of power spawned by White supremacy have become commonplace. Likewise, as our understanding of the multidimensionality of the gender spectrum has grown, so has our lexicon. The words non-binary, gender-queer, and transgender no longer raise eyebrows in some parts of the USA. Pronouns have become a part of introductions in many places where people gather.

Literary contributions by Kimberlé Crenshaw (2019), Isabel Wilkerson (2020), Ibram X. Kendi (2016), Nikole Hannah Jones (2021), Kenneth Hardy (2022), Roxane Ortiz-Dunbar (2014), Juan Gonzalez (2000), and others have offered well-researched histories of how greed for land and cheap labor resulted in governments commodifying people, as well as frameworks for understanding and dismantling the settler colonial ideologies that shape the lived experiences of people targeted for harm. These same ideologies have fostered a patriarchal system that dictates what women can and cannot do with their bodies, who can marry whom, and one’s gender identity, regardless of what the individual claims for themself.

Yet, as voices of resistance to these dogmas have become more prominent, more insistent, and more valued, so have those voices determined to silence them. We are bearing witness to egregious efforts by elected officials, departments of education, social media, and libraries to prevent these “counter narratives” from reaching the masses.

Too often, the “rule of law” is cited by right-leaning politicians and their supporters as justification for efforts to erase or discredit these narratives. The question that begs to be asked is “What rule of law is their point of reference”? What does rule of law even mean to those who are descendants of Indigenous people, enslaved African-descended people, of Asian people who were denied citizenship in the USA from the late 1800s until 1954, and Mexican people who were admitted to the USA under the Bracero program and then deported when the program ended in 1964? How does the rule of law further complicate lives when viewed through the lens of the intersectionality of race and gender?  The rule of law has not ensured fair and equal treatment for African-descended people and other people of color in the world’s oldest democracy. It has not done much better with women or those who do not identify within the gender binary. In fact, for much of the history of the United States’ democracy, these populations have experienced the rule of law as a tool that has consistently rendered them to second-class citizenship.

This Special Issue of the Journal of Genealogy seeks to add to the voices of resistance; to the voices committed to dismantling settler colonial ideologies of dominance; to the voices that understand that there are multiple ways of knowing and learning. We, therefore, invite contributions that tell the stories of race and gender through:

  • Traditional articles;
  • Poetry;
  • Photo journals;
  • Artwork;
  • Personal narratives.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400-600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors (Email A) or to the Genealogy editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

References:

Crenshaw, Kimberlè (2019). On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. New York: The New Press.

Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2014). An Indigenous people’s history of the United States. Boston: Beacon Press.

Gonzalez, J. (2000). Harvest of empire: A history of Latinos in America. New York: Penguin Group.

Hardy, K.V. (2022). The enduring, invisible, and ubiquitous centrality of Whiteness. New York. W.W. Norton & Co. Inc.

Jones, N.H. (2021). The 1619 project: A new origin story. New York: One World/Random House.

Kendi, I.X. (2016). Stamped from the beginning. New York: Hatchette Book Group, Inc.

Lorde, Audre (1982). Learning from the 1960s. Retrieved from BlackPast.

https://www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/1982-audre-lorde-learning-60s/#:~:text=There%20is%20no%20such%20thing,Martin%20Luther%20King%2C%20Jr.

Wilkerson, I. (2020). Caste: The origins of our discontent. New York: Random House.

Dr. Robyn Brown-Manning
Dr. Willie Tolliver
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Genealogy is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • race
  • gender
  • settler colonialism
  • ideologies of dominance
  • oppression
  • resistance

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

12 pages, 242 KiB  
Article
Black Gay Men in Graduate Education: A Collaborative Autoethnography of Finding Black Queer Joy
by Akeem Modeste-James and Franklin Chilaka
Genealogy 2024, 8(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8010024 - 5 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1611
Abstract
In today’s sociopolitical climate, many marginalized communities face unique challenges and yet triumph in carving a pathway toward happiness and self-acceptance. Among those resilient individuals are Black gay men, who experience the intersectionality of race, gender, and sexuality, creating an array of experiences. [...] Read more.
In today’s sociopolitical climate, many marginalized communities face unique challenges and yet triumph in carving a pathway toward happiness and self-acceptance. Among those resilient individuals are Black gay men, who experience the intersectionality of race, gender, and sexuality, creating an array of experiences. This collaborative autoethnography explores the distinct hardship Black gay men face in graduate education while trying to find Black queer joy, particularly at predominantly white institutions (PWIs), where these programs can perpetuate institutional and systemic racism and homophobia. Through interviews, three themes emerged: a sense of belonging, battle fatigue, and finding joy. Elevating the experiences of Black gay men emphasizes the importance of recognizing intersectionality and inclusivity in institutional spaces for a more sustainable future. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research

10 pages, 199 KiB  
Commentary
‘I Am a Broken Policy’: A Critical Reflection on Whiteness and Gender Anti-Black Racism in Institutions of Higher Education and Social Services
by Tiffany N. Younger
Genealogy 2024, 8(2), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8020052 - 8 May 2024
Viewed by 126
Abstract
This personal narrative is a critical reflection and affirmation letter to Black women. Throughout this commentary, at the end of each section, I have included what I call “gems”. I hope they serve as a manifesto for our collective healing from working in [...] Read more.
This personal narrative is a critical reflection and affirmation letter to Black women. Throughout this commentary, at the end of each section, I have included what I call “gems”. I hope they serve as a manifesto for our collective healing from working in institutions that center on the ideologies and practices of dominance. This piece particularly focuses on the dominant ideology and practice of “whiteness” within institutions as a surveillance tool through policy that directly impacts Black women’s wellbeing through gender anti-black racism. Through storytelling and drawing on Black feminist scholarship, this narrative exposes the challenges I faced with institutional policies and practices as I pursued my career in both academia and social service work. Throughout this narrative, I highlight how the undercurrent of whiteness is embedded in the foundation of institutional policy and practices. This narrative serves as a demand for institutional accountability and reckoning with the coloniality of epistemology and ontology. There is a great emotional toll for Black women who are confronting and resisting gendered anti-black racism with deep internal struggles and triumphs. The violent institutional practices seek to eclipse Black women’s ability to dream, imagine and create. Whiteness is centered in institutional infrastructure, serves as a distraction, and impedes our ability to conceptualize the world we desire. We deserve to have imagination in our work. This narrative is a reflection of the harm of whiteness, a guide for Black women academics, a manifesto for change, and a testament to our humanity. Full article
Back to TopTop