Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical Advances and Prognosis

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Orthopedics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 November 2024 | Viewed by 6240

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece
Interests: hip arthroplasty; knee fracture; sports medicine; knee arthroplasty; ACL reconstruction

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece
Interests: orthopedic surgery; knee; shoulder; ankle; arthroscopic surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) remains one of the most common surgical interventions in orthopaedics and sports medicine. Although more patients return to full activity without significant complications, there is still a continuous need for the evolution and improvement of existing techniques. Furthermore, there is still a lot of controversy regarding the ideal graft, while novel techniques have emerged, such as the all-inside repair technique or the utilization of scaffolds to enhance local biology, in an attempt to achieve better outcomes. The possibility of functional instead of surgical repair, graft choice, fixation of the graft, concomitant injuries and their management, and complications following reconstruction are some of the issues that orthopaedic surgeons have to face in everyday clinical practice when addressing ACL tears. Lastly, a relatively early but mainly safe return to sports, along with a high rate of patient satisfaction, constitutes a primary objective of ACL reconstruction.

The goal of this Special Issue is to provide a comprehensive review of these challenges by collecting papers from an expert panel of authors, with a particular focus on clinical advances and prognosis after ACL reconstruction.

Dr. Georgios Komnos
Prof. Dr. Michael Hantes
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • anterior cruciate ligament
  • ACL reconstruction
  • ACL grafts
  • ACL biology
  • challenges

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 6674 KiB  
Article
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Double Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation Devices Provides Good Clinical Outcomes in Patients under the Age of 40 Years at Two-Year Follow-Up
by Theofylaktos Kyriakidis, Alexandros Tzaveas, Ioannes Melas, Kosmas Petras, Artemis-Maria Iosifidou and Michael Iosifidis
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(18), 5436; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185436 - 13 Sep 2024
Viewed by 740
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using double adjustable fixation gained popularity in the last decade due to its minimally invasive technique. However, suspensory fixation devices could be related to recurrent instability, poor clinical outcomes, and patient dissatisfaction. The present study aims to [...] Read more.
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using double adjustable fixation gained popularity in the last decade due to its minimally invasive technique. However, suspensory fixation devices could be related to recurrent instability, poor clinical outcomes, and patient dissatisfaction. The present study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes following ACLR using double adjustable-loop suspensory fixation devices in the demanding population of young patients. Methods: Between 2019 and 2022, 95 patients with knee post-traumatic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency were treated with primary ACLR using semitendinosus quadrupled graft and double adjustable-loop suspensory fixation devices and followed for at least two years. Concomitant lesions were also treated at the same surgical time. The knee examination form of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) was used to assess clinical evaluation, and the return to physical activities using the Tegner Activity Scale was recorded. Patient-reported objective measures (PROMs) were also evaluated, including the IKDC subjective and Lysholm scores. Results: Sixty-six males and twenty-nine females with a mean age of 23.8 (range 18–37) and a mean BMI of 24.9 (SD ± 2.42) kg/m2 were included in this study. All patients were evaluated clinically as normal or nearly normal at the final follow-up. PROMs also significantly improved postoperatively (p < 0.05) compared to the preoperative values. The Tegner Activity Scale increased from 2 to 7, the IKDC mean score improved from 43.9 (±8.9) to 93.3 (±12.3), and the modified Lysholm from 47.3 (±11.1) to 92.9 (±16.6). No complications or adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing double adjustable-loop suspensory fixation devices provides good clinical and functional outcomes in young patients at a two-year follow-up. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1278 KiB  
Article
Reliability and Validity of Temporal Parameters during the Side Hop Test in Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
by Anna Stitelmann, Lara Allet, Stéphane Armand and Philippe Tscholl
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(12), 3407; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13123407 - 11 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1029
Abstract
Background: The side hop test (SHT) measures the number of jumps performed over 30 s. Although this measure has demonstrated its value in clinical practice, the temporal parameters of the SHT allow for a deeper analysis of the execution strategy. The aim of [...] Read more.
Background: The side hop test (SHT) measures the number of jumps performed over 30 s. Although this measure has demonstrated its value in clinical practice, the temporal parameters of the SHT allow for a deeper analysis of the execution strategy. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability and construct validity of contact time parameters during the SHT recorded by a video analysis system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed (ACLR) patients. Methods: We investigated the reliability (intra-rater, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change (MDC)), discriminant validity (operated (OP) versus non-operated (NOP) side), and convergent validity (relationship with strength and psychological readiness) of SHT contact time parameters, number of valid hops and limb symmetry index (LSI) in 38 ACLR patients. Contact time parameters are presented as mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV) of contact time. Results: Intra-tester reliability was good to excellent for all contact time parameters. For discriminant validity, the mean and SD contact times of the OP leg were significantly longer than those of the NOP leg, although the difference was smaller than the SEM and MDC values. The number of valid jumps and CV contact time parameters were not significantly different. Isokinetic quadriceps strength (60°/s) was strongly correlated with mean contact time for both legs. However, psychological readiness was not correlated with any of the contact time parameters. Conclusions: Temporal parameters of the SHT measured on video analysis are valid and reliable parameters to assess the performance strategy of the SHT. The results should be interpreted with caution regarding the SEM and MDC values. Further studies are needed to measure criterion validity, inter-rater reliability, and responsiveness. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 993 KiB  
Article
Impact of Surgical Timing on Functional Outcomes after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
by Tatsuhiro Kawashima, Hirotaka Mutsuzaki, Arata Watanabe, Kotaro Ikeda, Yuki Yamanashi and Tomonori Kinugasa
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(10), 2994; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102994 - 20 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1323
Abstract
Objectives: Although acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often avoided because of postoperative joint stiffness, delayed ACLR can lead to a longer recovery time and can have a negative impact on physical function due to detraining. This study aimed to determine [...] Read more.
Objectives: Although acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often avoided because of postoperative joint stiffness, delayed ACLR can lead to a longer recovery time and can have a negative impact on physical function due to detraining. This study aimed to determine the effects of acute ACLR on postoperative outcomes, including muscle strength, performance, and return to sports. Methods: A total of 110 patients who underwent anatomical ACLR using hamstring autografts were included in this study and were divided into three groups: acute (ACLR performed within 2 weeks after ACL injury), 2–6 weeks (ACLR performed between 2 and 6 weeks after injury), and 6–12 weeks (ACLR performed between 6 and 12 weeks after injury). Several parameters were evaluated, including range of motion, knee joint stability, isokinetic knee strength, performance, and return to sports. Results: No significant differences were found in the range of motion or knee joint stability between the groups. The acute group exhibited significantly greater quadriceps strength at 3 months postoperatively than the other groups (p < 0.05). The single-leg hop test showed that 66.7%, 38.7%, and 33.3% of the patients in the acute, 2–6 weeks, and 6–12 weeks groups, respectively, recovered to an LSI of 90% or greater (p = 0.09, Cramer’s V = 0.27). All patients in the acute group were able to return to sports (p = 0.14; Cramer’s V = 0.28). Conclusions: Acute ACLR is advantageous for the early recovery of strength and performance without adverse events. Acute ACLR may shorten the time spent away from sports activities. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 843 KiB  
Article
Influence of a Concomitant Medial Meniscus Injury on Knee Joint Function and Osteoarthritis Presence after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
by Darian Bayerl, Lukas B. Moser, Markus Neubauer, Johannes Neugebauer, Dietmar Dammerer, Markus Winnisch and Rudolf Schabus
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2433; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082433 - 22 Apr 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1188
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how a medial meniscus injury accompanying an anterior cruciate ligament rupture affects the clinical outcome 10 years after ACL reconstruction. (2) Methods: A total of 37 patients who received anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how a medial meniscus injury accompanying an anterior cruciate ligament rupture affects the clinical outcome 10 years after ACL reconstruction. (2) Methods: A total of 37 patients who received anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) were included in this retrospective study. Two groups were analyzed at a single follow-up of 10 years: (i) “isolated (ACLR)” (n = 20) and (ii) “ACLR with medial meniscal injury” (n = 17). The following clinical scores were recorded: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Score. To determine the degree of osteoarthritis the Kellgren–Lawrence score was used. (3) Results: The “isolated ACLR” study group scored significantly higher (p < 0.05) on the IKDC subjective questionnaire (mean: 88.4) than the “ACLR with medial meniscus injury” group (mean: 81). The KOOS category “activities of daily living” showed significantly better results in the isolated ACLR group (p < 0.05). The “ACLR with medial meniscus injury” group had significantly higher degree of osteoarthritis (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in all the other clinical scores. (4) Conclusions: The results of this study further indicate that patients with a concomitant medial meniscus injury have slightly more discomfort in everyday life and increased risk of developing osteoarthritis 10 years after surgery. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 508 KiB  
Review
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: Individualized Indications for Non-Operative Management
by George A. Komnos, Michael H. Hantes, Georgios Kalifis, Nifon K. Gkekas, Artemis Hante and Jacques Menetrey
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(20), 6233; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206233 - 18 Oct 2024
Viewed by 440
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture represents a common sports injury that is mostly managed operatively. However, non-operative treatment can also play a role, despite the limited high-quality published data on ACL tear management. Both methods have shown favorable outcomes, but clear guidelines based [...] Read more.
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture represents a common sports injury that is mostly managed operatively. However, non-operative treatment can also play a role, despite the limited high-quality published data on ACL tear management. Both methods have shown favorable outcomes, but clear guidelines based on high-quality research are lacking. Several factors should be considered and discussed with the patient before deciding on the best treatment method. These include patient characteristics and expectations, concomitant injuries, and clinical evaluation, with laxity or/and instability being one of the most essential parameters examined. This should eventually lead to an individualized approach for each patient to ensure the best possible outcome. This review aims to delve into all parameters that are related to ACL rupture and guide physicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment method for each patient. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2278 KiB  
Review
Management of Medial Femorotibial Knee Osteoarthritis in Conjunction with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency: Technical Note and Literature Review
by Claudio Legnani, Alberto Ventura, Laura Mangiavini, Nicola Maffulli and Giuseppe M. Peretti
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3143; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113143 - 27 May 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 855
Abstract
In recent years, there has been increased interest in the management of medial femorotibial knee osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Traditional treatment modalities included conservative therapy, high tibial osteotomy with or without ACL reconstruction, and total knee replacement. [...] Read more.
In recent years, there has been increased interest in the management of medial femorotibial knee osteoarthritis (OA) in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. Traditional treatment modalities included conservative therapy, high tibial osteotomy with or without ACL reconstruction, and total knee replacement. Since younger patients with higher physical demands are more likely to suffer from this pathological condition, reduced invasiveness, faster recovery time, and improved knee kinematics are preferred to allow for satisfying clinical and functional outcomes. Thus, a new surgical strategy combining medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and ACL reconstruction has been proposed to allow bone stock preservation, to reduce surgical morbidity and recovery time, and ultimately to improve joint kinematics and clinical outcomes. Based on the data present in the literature, in the setting of unicompartmental OA in association with ACL deficiency, UKR combined with ACL reconstruction provided encouraging early results. Studies evaluating the outcomes of combined ACL reconstruction and UKR demonstrate promising results in select patient populations. Improved knee stability, pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction improved after surgery. Moreover, the combined approach offered advantages such as reduced surgical trauma, faster rehabilitation, and preservation of native knee anatomy compared with traditional treatment strategies. However, still, high-level studies on this topic are lacking; therefore, more comparative studies reporting long-term outcomes are needed to support the potential of this combined procedure to become mainstream. In this paper, we discuss the relevant features and rationale behind the indications and technique of this combined surgical procedure, to help surgeons choose the correct therapeutic approach for a patient with concomitant medial OA and ACL insufficiency. Continued advancements in surgical techniques, patient selection criteria, and rehabilitation strategies will further enhance the success of this combined approach, offering hope to individuals with concomitant ACL injuries and unicompartmental knee OA. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: The Double-Edged Sword: ACL Reconstructions on Adolescent Patients - Growth Plate Surgical Challenges and Future Considerations.
Authors: Alexandria Mallinos; Kerwyn Jones
Affiliation: Akron Children's Hospital

Back to TopTop