Green, Sustainable and Solidary Bonds

A special issue of Journal of Risk and Financial Management (ISSN 1911-8074). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability and Finance".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2022) | Viewed by 3035

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, NECE–Research Center in Business Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200-001 Covilhã, Portugal
Interests: entrepreneurship; innovation; market dynamics; public policy

E-Mail
Guest Editor
1. University of Jena, Fürstengraben 1, 07743 Jena, Germany;
2. GC University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
Interests: entrepreneurship; innovation; international finance; institutions

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, University of Almería, 04120 La Cañada, Almería, Spain
Interests: financial analysis; financial valuation; international finance

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The impact of the latest global recession is an opportunity for rethinking and changing the dominant economic model geared towards economic growth based on the unsustainable consumption of goods and resources. This amount of consumption has contributed to increased concentrations of polluting emissions and has led some policy makers and entrepreneurs to implement new environmental procedures with strong carbon mitigation components. In the challenge to transition to a sustainable and environmentally-friendly economic model, the concept of green finance has gradually and more powerfully emerged. Green finance is understood as a response to possible breaches in the supply of financing sources and a mechanism that promotes increased financial flows to companies (Glomsrod and Wei, 2018).

Following this lens of analysis, the green bond market presents itself as an ecological financial instrument, since the former has characteristics that allow the achievement of the objectives of the Paris Convention (Tolliver et al., 2020). The green bond market is attractive for investors, which, mainly for non-pecuniary reasons (Zerbib, 2019), allows for the issuance of debt at a lower cost (Dafermos et al., 2018).

However, despite the growing demand for green bonds, this market still has a lower volume of transactions compared to the conventional bond and equities market (Reboredo and Ugolini, 2018). This may be due to an asymmetry in terms of supply and demand (e.g., lack of liquidity) due to a small supply of green bonds (Febi et al., 2018). Thus, there are many research opportunities to advance knowledge about the factors that can promote the growth of the green bond market (Chiesa and Barua, 2019), which can be allied to recent opportunities that solidarity bonds (e.g., Eurobonds (van der Wansem et al., 2019)) can bring to the development of an alternative economic model based on sustainable development and anchored on values of political, economic and social solidarity.

Thus, there is a need to carry out comparative studies on conventional bonds, green bonds, sustainable bonds and solidarity bonds from a government, corporate and investor perspective. This Special Issue aims to contribute to the extension of the literature on green finance, climate and societal change and sustainable markets.

References:

Chiesa, M., & Barua, S. (2019). The surge of impact borrowing: the magnitude and determinants of green bond supply and its heterogeneity across markets. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 9(2), 138–161.

Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M., & Galanis, G. (2018). Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy. Ecological Economics, 152, 219–234.

Febi, W., Schäfer, D., Stephan, A., & Sun, C. (2018). The impact of liquidity risk on the yield spread of green bonds. Finance Research Letters, 27, 53–59.

Glomsrød, S., & Wei, T. (2018). Business as unusual: The implications of fossil divestment and green bonds for financial flows, economic growth and energy market. Energy for Sustainable Development, 44, 1–10.

Reboredo, J. C., & Ugolini, A. (2018). The impact of energy prices on clean energy stock prices. A multivariate quantile dependence approach. Energy Economics, 76, 136–152.

Tolliver, C., Keeley, A. R., & Managi, S. (2020). Drivers of green bond market growth: The importance of Nationally Determined Contributions to the Paris Agreement and implications for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 244, 20 January 2020, 118643.

van der Wansem, P., Jessen, L., & Rivetti, D. (2019). Issuing International Bonds A Guidance Note. Discussion Paper MTI Global Practice, N.º 13 April 2019, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW Washington, DC 20433.

Zerbib, O. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking and Finance, 98, 39–60.

Prof. Dr. João Carlos Correia Leitão
Dr. Muhammad Faraz Riaz
Prof. Dr. Alfonso Rojo Ramírez

Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Risk and Financial Management is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Climate mitigation 
  • Energy transition 
  • Financial markets 
  • Global crisis and sustainable finance 
  • Green and sustainable bonds 
  • Green finance 
  • Low carbon 
  • Risk mitigation strategies and bonds emission 
  • Solidarity bonds and debt mutualization 
  • Sustainable energy investments

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 271 KiB  
Article
Do Investors Value Environmental Corporate Policies? Evidence from the Australian Market
by Mohinesh Chandra and Alireza Tourani-Rad
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2021, 14(3), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030124 - 16 Mar 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1882
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the relationship between a firm’s environmental policies and their risk-adjusted stock returns, using a sample of stock exchange-listed Australian firms over the period of 2010–2018. We observed a positive and statistically significant relationship suggesting that a firm’s environmental [...] Read more.
In this paper, we explore the relationship between a firm’s environmental policies and their risk-adjusted stock returns, using a sample of stock exchange-listed Australian firms over the period of 2010–2018. We observed a positive and statistically significant relationship suggesting that a firm’s environmental policies partially explain their stock performance. Moreover, we found that investors in the Australian market significantly value a companies’ efforts to reduce emissions, and that this primarily drives the investors’ observed reaction to a firm’s social corporate policies. Next, we formed portfolios and observed that portfolios formed on high environmental, social, and governance (ESG) Environmental Pillar scores consistently outperformed those formed on low-ESG Environmental Pillar scores. Overall, our results lend support to the notion that investors in the Australian market value information about a firm’s social policies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green, Sustainable and Solidary Bonds)
Back to TopTop