New Perspectives on Italian Dialects

A special issue of Languages (ISSN 2226-471X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 April 2022) | Viewed by 16002

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Romance Languages and Literatures, GoetheUniversität Frankfurt am Main – Università degli Studi di Padova, 60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Interests: formal syntax; microvariation; Italian dialects; linguistic change; Old Italian

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Romance Languages and Literatures, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main – Università degli Studi di Padova, 60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Interests: acoustic phonetics; government phonology; phonetics–phonology interface; Italian dialects; Rhaeto-Romance varieties; vowel length

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

While typology is the telescope of linguistics, dialectology has always been its magnifying lens, and with the new cartographic methodologies and online databases (see the SAND, ASIt, etc.) it can even become like a microscope to observe very detailed facts that often put into question well-established generalizations. Traditionally, dialectological work has always raised a fundamental problem for all those approaches to language that presuppose that language is akin to other phenomena of the physical world in being described by inviolable rules. Since the time of the neogrammarian school, which was the first attempt to establish linguistics as a scientific domain of inquiry, dialectological work has put this very basic assumption into question on the basis of microvariation data.

Dialectologists knew two centuries before the Chomskyan turn that language is a phenomenon of the individual, and not only of the community, because in studying local languages they had already observed that each person has a subtly different language with different grammatical properties. The sheer notion of “idiolect” is a confirmation that language is unique to the single person. Traditional dialectologists took into account marketplaces, parishes, the presence of roads, bridges, rivers, and mountains which could hinder or favor contact and, therefore, variation, earning the term “geolinguistics”.

This tentative detailed picture of the streams of microcontact had, at the root, the same idea of formal linguistics that assumes the existence of an “ideal” speaker and the possibility to describe linguistic behavior on the basis of rules (which at the time were phonological rules of diachronic change from Latin to Romance). Dialectology has always sought to establish regularities in the domain where it is most difficult, i.e., where you really observe the language of the single speaker, since the so-called “dialects” are not influenced by the normative pressure provided by standardization. Pushing this idea to the limit, one might say that dialectology studies the only languages that are worth being studied, i.e., those that have not been “tampered with” by a self-conscious attempt to make the language different from what it naturally is. In the last twenty years, dialectological work has had important recognition even in formal approaches, like generative grammar, through the work initiated by Kayne and a number of Italian and Dutch linguists, who created a network of dialectological projects based on the generative approach to language variation. It has long been noticed that comparing languages that are very similar to each other provides for the best possible experimental scenario, since it is possible to study a single phenomenon as a variable keeping all other grammatical factors as a constant due to the similar grammars of the languages investigated (see Kayne 2013 for a discussion of this topic on the basis of specific examples). More recently, there have been attempts to exploit geolinguistics in a formal sense by providing geographical maps illustrating the way phenomena correlate, exclude, or include each other in a homogeneous dialectal area (see Barbiers and Goeman 2013, Garzonio and Poletto 2018).

For this volume, we invite contributions on any empirical phenomenon of syntactic microvariation concerning dialects spoken on the Italian territory. We encourage contributions that can have an impact either on the general theory of syntax or on methodological issues that might help any advancement in syntactic research.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400-600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to [email protected]. Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purpose of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the special issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

Tentative completion schedule:

  • Abstract submission deadline: 1 September 2021
  • Full manuscript deadline: 30 April 2022

References

ASIt = Atlante Sintattico d’Italia. http://asit.maldura.unipd.it/ .

Barbiers, S., & Goeman, T. (2013). Research results from on-line dialect databases and dynamic dialect maps. Language and Space. An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Volume 3: Dutch.

Garzonio, J., & Poletto, C. (2018). Exploiting microvariation: How to make the best of your incomplete data. Glossa3(1).

Kayne, R. S. (2013). Comparative syntax. Lingua130, 132-151.

SAND = Syntactische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten / Syntactic atlas of the Dutch dialects, Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips, Jan Pieter Kunst, 2000-2008.

 

Prof. Dr. Cecilia Poletto
Dr. Tommaso Balsemin
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Languages is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Italian dialects
  • microvariation
  • geolinguistics

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

12 pages, 376 KiB  
Article
A Special (Question) View on Wh-Doubling in Lombard Varieties
by Jacopo Garzonio, Enrico Castro and Jessica Rita Messina
Languages 2023, 8(3), 223; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030223 - 20 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1238
Abstract
In this article, we examine a specific type of Wh-Doubling (WhD) that can be observed in some Northern Lombard varieties. Differently from all the previous types of WhD described for Lombard and other Northern Italo-Romance varieties, in the phenomenon we analyze, the two [...] Read more.
In this article, we examine a specific type of Wh-Doubling (WhD) that can be observed in some Northern Lombard varieties. Differently from all the previous types of WhD described for Lombard and other Northern Italo-Romance varieties, in the phenomenon we analyze, the two wh-forms are identical and display the -ɛ morpheme. Furthermore, in all the varieties where this type of WhD is present, it is associated with the encoding of special questions and cannot be used in true requests for new information. We propose an analysis of this construction assuming a split-CP representation where the higher wh-form activates a functional projection involved in the expression of special questions. We also hypothesize that this construction derives from an interrogative cleft; if this hypothesis is correct, the formation of the -ɛ morpheme and the re-analysis of the cleft as monoclausal are the two sides of the same process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
31 pages, 1557 KiB  
Article
Microvariation in the Distribution of Resumptive Pronouns in the Left Dislocation Construction in Two Tyrolean Dialects of Northern Italy
by Federica Cognola and Jan Casalicchio
Languages 2023, 8(2), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020091 - 23 Mar 2023
Viewed by 1819
Abstract
In this paper we document a so-far neglected case of microvariation involving resumptive pronouns in the left-dislocation construction in Meranese, spoken in South Tyrol, and Mòcheno, spoken in the Fersina valley (Trentino). While in standard German resumptive elements in this construction belong to [...] Read more.
In this paper we document a so-far neglected case of microvariation involving resumptive pronouns in the left-dislocation construction in Meranese, spoken in South Tyrol, and Mòcheno, spoken in the Fersina valley (Trentino). While in standard German resumptive elements in this construction belong to the class of D-pronouns, the two Tyrolean dialects considered in the paper exhibit, as resumptive pronouns, both (i) D-pronouns and (ii) pronominal usages of the distal demonstrative formed by the definite article (D) and sèll corresponding to ‘that one’. We show that in both languages D+sèll forms overlap with German D-pronouns in most contexts, whereas D-pronouns only superficially, but not functionally, correspond to German D-pronouns, and have undergone a weakening process. While the weakening process is in nuce in Meranese, it seems to be nearly completed in Mòcheno, where D-pronouns appear to have acquired a status close to that of subject clitics of Northern Italian varieties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 777 KiB  
Article
Fortune and Decay of Lexical Expletives in Germanic and Romance along the Adige River
by Alessandra Tomaselli and Ermenegildo Bidese
Languages 2023, 8(1), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010044 - 1 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1435
Abstract
Lexical expletives can be divided into two main classes: (i) CP expletives required by the V2 constraint and, hence, by the necessity to lexicalize the position on the left of the inflected verb and (ii) TP expletives connected with the negative value of [...] Read more.
Lexical expletives can be divided into two main classes: (i) CP expletives required by the V2 constraint and, hence, by the necessity to lexicalize the position on the left of the inflected verb and (ii) TP expletives connected with the negative value of the pro-drop parameter and, therefore, with the necessity to lexicalize the ’structural‘ subject position, specifically, [Spec, TP]. The latter can, in turn, be divided into two subclasses: impersonal subjects and positional expletives, which occur with postverbal/low subjects and extraposed subject clauses. While CP expletives only appear in Germanic varieties that maintain V2, the subclassification of TP expletives yields interesting results when comparing Cimbrian and the Venetan varieties in Nord-East Italy, where the gradual disappearance of the positional expletive in free inversion structures and the residual maintenance of impersonal subjects from North to South along the Adige River confirms the distinction between two classes of subject expletives; furthermore, the resilience of impersonal subjects and their distribution in the northwestern part of the area under consideration sheds light on the role of language contact which is confirmed along the same axis—but crucially in the opposite direction—by the increasing employment of cleft constructions in WH-clauses replacing enclisis (i.e.,: pronominal subject inversion with the finite verb). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
25 pages, 437 KiB  
Article
Towards a Typology of wh-Doubling in Northern Italian Dialects
by Nicola Munaro and Cecilia Poletto
Languages 2023, 8(1), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010024 - 12 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1403
Abstract
In this work we examine the distribution of wh-in-situ and short (i.e., clause internal) wh-doubling in Northern Italian dialects with the purpose of showing that wh-in-situ and wh-doubling are not unitary phenomena, since they are subject to different distributional [...] Read more.
In this work we examine the distribution of wh-in-situ and short (i.e., clause internal) wh-doubling in Northern Italian dialects with the purpose of showing that wh-in-situ and wh-doubling are not unitary phenomena, since they are subject to different distributional properties across dialects. We show that wh-doubling cannot be reduced to a single analysis but rather corresponds to a family of phenomena which have in common the basic procedure of feature doubling, within which the copying mechanism applies to different subsets or packages of features and is constrained in different ways. Furthermore, some types of doubling correspond in their distribution with some types of wh-in-situ, which shows that the two phenomena must be related and that different types of wh-in-situ are the null counterpart of different types of wh-doubling. However, in the languages in which wh-in-situ is generalized, wh-in-situ has nothing to do with wh-doubling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
16 pages, 4341 KiB  
Article
Expletive Subject Clitics in Northern Italo-Romance
by Diego Pescarini
Languages 2022, 7(4), 265; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040265 - 18 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1587
Abstract
This article examines the syntax of subject clitics in northern Italian dialects. Statistical analysis is performed on a sample of 350 dialects to show that the co-variation between syntactic variables is significant. The variables under examination are the occurrence of subject clitics with [...] Read more.
This article examines the syntax of subject clitics in northern Italian dialects. Statistical analysis is performed on a sample of 350 dialects to show that the co-variation between syntactic variables is significant. The variables under examination are the occurrence of subject clitics with non-dislocated subjects (e.g., the wh element who); the occurrence of subject clitics with nonthematic predicates (e.g., weather verbs); and the occurrence of subject clitics with subjects of any person. Syntactic variables are in turn linked to verbal agreement; in the above contexts, clitics are more readily found in dialects with “poor” inflection. Theoretical issues concerning the syntactic representation of subject clitics, null subjects, and doubling are addressed in light of quantitative findings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

47 pages, 3134 KiB  
Article
Number Morphology and Bare Nouns in Some Romance Dialects of Italy
by Cristina Guardiano, Michela Cambria and Vincenzo Stalfieri
Languages 2022, 7(4), 255; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040255 - 30 Sep 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1996
Abstract
This paper explores aspects of microvariation concerning the morphological realization of the feature Number within nominal structures in a selected subset of Romance dialects of Italy. First, the different strategies adopted in the dialects of the dataset for the realization of number alternations [...] Read more.
This paper explores aspects of microvariation concerning the morphological realization of the feature Number within nominal structures in a selected subset of Romance dialects of Italy. First, the different strategies adopted in the dialects of the dataset for the realization of number alternations on various nominal categories (nouns/adjectives, articles, demonstratives, and possessives) are presented. Then, the relation between the latter and the distribution of “bare” argument nominals (i.e., of nominal structures which, in argument position, occur without any lexicalized determiner) is explored. It will be observed that the distribution of bare arguments in the dialects of the dataset is consistent with the hypotheses made in the literature, which suggest that there is a correlation between the realization of number alternations on nouns and the possibility for “null” (i.e., unpronounced) determiners to be licensed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
Show Figures

Figure A1

22 pages, 668 KiB  
Article
Interactions between Clitic Subjects and Objects in Piedmont and North Liguria Dialects
by Benedetta Baldi and Leonardo Maria Savoia
Languages 2022, 7(3), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030199 - 29 Jul 2022
Viewed by 1261
Abstract
This contribution addresses a set of phenomena attested in the dialects spoken in Piedmont, including Franco-Provençal and Occitan varieties, and in West Liguria, concerning the interaction between subject and object clitics. Complementarily to these phenomena, we find the interplay between the realization of [...] Read more.
This contribution addresses a set of phenomena attested in the dialects spoken in Piedmont, including Franco-Provençal and Occitan varieties, and in West Liguria, concerning the interaction between subject and object clitics. Complementarily to these phenomena, we find the interplay between the realization of the 3rd person clitic and the auxiliary. More specifically, we will investigate the object-for-subject mechanism in the Piedmontese and Franco-Provençal dialects, the one of subject-with-object in some Franco-Provençal dialects and their possible interaction with the auxiliary. In some Piedmontese dialects, the alternation between be and have affects the distribution of subject and object clitics; in particular, the 3rd person clitic can occur in all persons, where it can be ambiguous between the subject or the object reading. The relation between the verb and the realization of its argumental clitics, and the interaction between auxiliaries and clitics are the main topics of this work. Our approach relies on the idea that clitics are the realization of φ-features associated with v and T and that auxiliaries are not functional elements but verbs with lexical properties. The theoretical frame we follow is the formulation recently proposed by Chomsky, based on the operation Merge and the Labeling Algorithm, leading to a more appropriate conceptualization of morpho-syntactic structures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
20 pages, 1082 KiB  
Article
Variation at the Syntax–Pragmatics Interface: Discourse Particles in Questions
by Silvio Cruschina and Valentina Bianchi
Languages 2022, 7(3), 183; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030183 - 15 Jul 2022
Viewed by 1870
Abstract
This paper focuses on the microvariation concerning the distribution and functions of certain interrogative discourse particles found in several central and southern Italian dialects. These particles show many similarities in terms of both their morphological shapes (being homophonous to the wh-phrase corresponding to [...] Read more.
This paper focuses on the microvariation concerning the distribution and functions of certain interrogative discourse particles found in several central and southern Italian dialects. These particles show many similarities in terms of both their morphological shapes (being homophonous to the wh-phrase corresponding to English ‘what’) and their syntactic distribution within the sentence, in that they all occur at the beginning of polar questions. However, a careful analysis of their distribution across a pragmatically defined typology of canonical and non-canonical polar questions shows that these particles are not possible in all question types. In particular, two patterns emerge: in Pattern B, the particle is associated with a conventional implicature that both the speaker and the addressee are competent with respect to the issue addressed by the polar question, while in Pattern A, this implicature is restricted to the addressee competence. This point of microvariation is then analysed by assuming that both the pragmatic assumptions of competence and the discourse participants are encoded in the syntactic representation; the cartographic framework is adopted to characterize the compositional structure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

37 pages, 2054 KiB  
Article
Residues and Extensions of Perfective Auxiliary be: Modal Conditioning
by Adam Ledgeway
Languages 2022, 7(3), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030160 - 29 Jun 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1976
Abstract
This article provides both a diachronic and synchronic account of the generalization of perfective auxiliary be in specific irrealis modal contexts across numerous Romance varieties spoken in Italy and more widely within the Romània, which has essentially gone unnoticed in the descriptive and [...] Read more.
This article provides both a diachronic and synchronic account of the generalization of perfective auxiliary be in specific irrealis modal contexts across numerous Romance varieties spoken in Italy and more widely within the Romània, which has essentially gone unnoticed in the descriptive and theoretical literature. In some cases (southern Calabrian, Latin American Spanish, Portuguese), the distribution of be is to be interpreted as a residue of an original unaccusative syntax which was exceptionally preserved under higher V-movement in irrealis contexts, whereas in others (person-driven dialects of central and southern Italy, southern peninsular Spanish, Romanian) this original unaccusative signal has been reanalysed as a specialized marker of irrealis (lexicalizing a high Mood head) and extended to all verb classes. In the case of Alguerès, by contrast, the generalization of irrealis be is argued to be the result of language contact with surrounding Sardinian dialects where a specific pattern of dedicated irrealis marking of Mood° has been replicated. Finally, the reverse pattern with generalization of irrealis have, the reanalysis of an aspectual distinction between resultative and experiential perfects found in early Romance varieties (Neapolitan, Sicilian, Spanish, Catalan), is shown to involve a similar pattern of dedicated irrealis marking in Mood°. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Italian Dialects)
Back to TopTop