COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 Investigations: Characteristics, Clinical Course, Prevention, Treatment and Prognosis

A special issue of Life (ISSN 2075-1729). This special issue belongs to the section "Epidemiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 December 2024 | Viewed by 11588

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Occupational Medicine Unit, University Hospital "Policlinico" of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
2. Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
Interests: occupational medicine; public health; biological risk; infectious diseases

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedical Research, National Medicines Institute, 00-725 Warsaw, Poland
Interests: diagnostics; medical biotechnology; drug discovery; infectious immunology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The detrimental effects on health caused by exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 viral agent are a major global health and economical concern. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than six million deaths have been recorded worldwide. To date, approximately ten billion vaccine doses have been administered globally. Furthermore, many available repurposing drugs have been tested, new targeted therapeutic products have been developed, and many therapeutic regimens have been revised.

The high variability of the spreading SARS-CoV-2 virus has resulted in a decline in the effectiveness of the originally developed vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and initiated a race to develop updated vaccines targeting newly emerging variants of the virus.

Despite the decline in the virulence of the new variants, they still present a danger to specific risk groups and humans as a whole.

Research carried out during the various phases of the pandemic evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 diagnosis, prevention and treatment provides a highly valuable practical resource.

This Special Issue aims to showcase a variety of recent developments in this area, with potential topics including, but not being limited to, the following:

  • Evolution of protection and prevention measures in different phases of the pandemic;
  • Analysis of the efficacy and safety of the therapy applied in patients with COVID-19;
  • Impact of vaccination on clinical manifestations, diagnosis, course of treatment and prognosis in patients diagnosed with COVID-19;
  • Impact of prognostic factors in patients with COVID-19 on treatment and prognosis,
  • Impact of prognostic factors in patients with unrecognized COVID-19 on clinical diagnosis,
  • Importance of patient age or comorbidities versus other clinical and demographic data in the treatment of COVID-19;
  • Importance of laboratory diagnostic parameters in the prognosis and treatment of patients with confirmed COVID-19;
  • Impact of SARS-CoV-2 virus variants on the variation in clinical manifestations, course of treatment and prognosis in patients with COVID-19.

We look forward to receiving your submissions. All submitted manuscripts will undergo a rigorous peer review process.

Dr. Antonio Caputi
Dr. Jarosław Walory
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Life is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • public health
  • biological risk
  • infectious diseases
  • vaccines and vaccinations
  • clinical recognition
  • treatment
  • disease course
  • prognosis

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

10 pages, 508 KiB  
Article
Persistent Olfactory and Taste Dysfunction after COVID-19
by Malgorzata Buksinska, Piotr Henryk Skarzynski, Danuta Raj-Koziak, Elzbieta Gos and Malgorzata Talarek
Life 2024, 14(3), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14030317 - 28 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1104
Abstract
(1) Background: One of the possible symptoms of COVID-19 is a sudden loss of smell and taste. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the severity of post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction (OD). A secondary aim was to assess the relationship between OD [...] Read more.
(1) Background: One of the possible symptoms of COVID-19 is a sudden loss of smell and taste. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the severity of post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction (OD). A secondary aim was to assess the relationship between OD and gustatory (taste) dysfunction (GD). Margins: 2.5 cm (1 inch) at top, bottom, right, and left. (2) Methods: The study group consisted of 81 subjects (16 men and 65 women) aged between 12 and 73 years. All of the patients presented to a center for subjective OD associated with COVID-19. They were tested with a Sniffin’ Sticks test (SST) for OD and a Taste Strip test (TS) for GD. (3) Anosmia was present in 18 participants (22%), hyposmia in 52 (64%), and normosmia in 11 (14%). Some 36% of the patients reported imaginary smells (phantosmia), but it did not correlate with olfactory sensitivity. Comparing the different parts of the SST showed that subjects scored lowest on the threshold part of the test. The results of the discrimination and identification parts of the test were better, implying that if the stimulus is intense enough, incorrect discrimination and identification of odors is less frequent. A sweet taste was the easiest to recognize (78% could do so), while the most difficult to recognize was salty (68%). There were weak and statistically non-significant correlations between olfactory and taste dysfunction. (4) Conclusions: The results suggest that post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction was more peripheral than central. Testing patients for the severity of post-COVID-19 OD may help clinicians treat the condition. Because there is no fully effective treatment, research on post-COVID-19 OD is needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 461 KiB  
Article
How Much Does SARS-CoV-2 Infection during Pregnancy Affect the Neonatal Brain, Heart, and Kidney? A Parallel between COVID-19, Vaccination, and Normal Pregnancy
by Daniela Eugenia Popescu, Ana Maria Cristina Jura, Dana Știube, Adrian Ciulpan, Florina Stoica, Simona Ioana Șipoș, Cosmin Cîtu, Florin Gorun and Mărioara Boia
Life 2024, 14(2), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14020224 - 5 Feb 2024
Viewed by 878
Abstract
During the last decades, a growing number of studies have shown that infections during pregnancy have an important impact on both pregnant women and their fetuses. Our goal was to include newborns from pregnancies with SARS-CoV-2 infection and to investigate the extension of [...] Read more.
During the last decades, a growing number of studies have shown that infections during pregnancy have an important impact on both pregnant women and their fetuses. Our goal was to include newborns from pregnancies with SARS-CoV-2 infection and to investigate the extension of neonatal complications using cardiac, abdominal, and cerebral ultrasonography; hearing testing; and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Likewise, neonates whose mothers were vaccinated against COVID-19 during pregnancy and those from pathology-free pregnancies were examined. A total of 458 mother–newborn dyads were included over a period of 10 months and divided into three groups: the COVID-19 group, vaccine group, and control group. Although six cardiac malformations were found in the COVID-19 group, no correlation was made compared to the vaccine and control group (p = 0.07). Grade 1 intraventricular hemorrhage and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy were the most prevalent among neonates from mothers with SARS-CoV-2 infection (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). The kidney anomaly found to be most frequent in this group was grade 1 unilateral hydronephrosis (p < 0.001). COVID-19 disease during the gestational period had no effect on the auditory or visual function. Our findings highlight the importance of implementing proper infection control practices for future mothers, and by continuing to investigate this topic, we can gather valuable insights that will improve neonatal health in this context. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 826 KiB  
Communication
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection 3 Years after the Start of the Pandemic: A Population-Level Observational Study
by Cecilia Acuti Martellucci, Maria Elena Flacco, Graziella Soldato, Giuseppe Di Martino, Roberto Carota, Annalisa Rosso, Marco De Benedictis, Graziano Di Marco, Rossano Di Luzio, Francesco Lisbona, Antonio Caponetti and Lamberto Manzoli
Life 2023, 13(11), 2111; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112111 - 24 Oct 2023
Viewed by 1507
Abstract
The risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections changes as new variants emerge, but the follow-up time for most of the available evidence is shorter than two years. This study evaluated SARS-CoV-2 reinfection rates in the total population of an Italian province up to three years [...] Read more.
The risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfections changes as new variants emerge, but the follow-up time for most of the available evidence is shorter than two years. This study evaluated SARS-CoV-2 reinfection rates in the total population of an Italian province up to three years since the pandemic’s start. This retrospective cohort study used official National Healthcare System data on SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccinations, demographics, and hospitalizations in the Province of Pescara, Italy, from 2 March 2020 to 31 December 2022. A total of 6541 (5.4%) reinfections and 33 severe and 18 lethal COVID-19 cases were recorded among the 121,412 subjects who recovered from a primary infection. There were no severe events following reinfection in the young population, whereas 1.1% of reinfected elderly died. A significantly higher reinfection risk was observed among females; unvaccinated individuals; adults (30–59 y); and subjects with hypertension, COPD, and kidney disease. Up to three years after a primary SARS-CoV-2 infection, the majority of the population did not experience a reinfection. The risk of severe COVID-19 following a reinfection was very low for young and adult individuals but still high for the elderly. The subjects with hybrid immunity showed a lower reinfection risk than the unvaccinated. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2023 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Rapid Multiplex Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Individual and Pooled Samples
by Young-Hyun Baek, Min-Young Park, Ho-Jae Lim, Dong-Jae Youm, Youngshin You, Seojin Ahn, Jung-Eun Park, Min-Jin Kim, Sun-Hwa Lee, Yong-Hak Sohn and Yong-Jin Yang
Life 2023, 13(8), 1717; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081717 - 10 Aug 2023
Viewed by 984
Abstract
Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is no longer a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has had a vast impact to date. Hence, continuous management is required, given the uncertainty caused by the potential [...] Read more.
Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is no longer a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has had a vast impact to date. Hence, continuous management is required, given the uncertainty caused by the potential evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) diagnosis has been fundamental in overcoming this issue. In this study, the performances of two rapid RT-qPCR assays (Real-Q Direct SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kit and Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 fast PCR Assay) with short PCR times were comparatively evaluated using a STANDARD M nCoV Real-Time Detection Kit (STANDARD M, conventional RT-qPCR assay). All kits showed a limit of detection values (102–103 copies/reaction). The evaluation showed that the two rapid assay tests had ≥97.89% sensitivity and ≥99.51% specificity (κ = 0.98) for individual samples and ≥97.32% sensitivity and ≥97.67% specificity for pooled samples compared to STANDARD M. These results indicate that the two rapid RT-qPCR kits, which showed significant time reduction in performance, are as effective as a conventional RT-qPCR assay. They are likely to increase not only the number of tests that can be performed but also the efficiency of sustainable management of COVID-19 in the long term. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 12811 KiB  
Article
Synthesis and in Silico Investigation of Organoselenium-Clubbed Schiff Bases as Potential Mpro Inhibitors for the SARS-CoV-2 Replication
by Saad Shaaban, Aly Abdou, Abdulrahman G. Alhamzani, Mortaga M. Abou-Krisha, Mahmoud A. Al-Qudah, Mohamed Alaasar, Ibrahim Youssef and Tarek A. Yousef
Life 2023, 13(4), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13040912 - 30 Mar 2023
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 1993
Abstract
Since the first report of the organoselenium compound, ebselen, as a potent inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro main protease by Z. Jin et al. (Nature, 2020), different OSe analogs have been developed and evaluated for their anti-COVID-19 activities. Herein, organoselenium-clubbed Schiff bases [...] Read more.
Since the first report of the organoselenium compound, ebselen, as a potent inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro main protease by Z. Jin et al. (Nature, 2020), different OSe analogs have been developed and evaluated for their anti-COVID-19 activities. Herein, organoselenium-clubbed Schiff bases were synthesized in good yields (up to 87%) and characterized using different spectroscopic techniques. Their geometries were studied by DFT using the B3LYP/6–311 (d, p) approach. Ten FDA-approved drugs targeting COVID-19 were used as model pharmacophores to interpret the binding requirements of COVID-19 inhibitors. The antiviral efficiency of the novel organoselenium compounds was assessed by molecular docking against the 6LU7 protein to investigate their possible interactions. Our results showed that the COVID-19 primary protease bound to organoselenium ligands with high binding energy scores ranging from −8.19 to −7.33 Kcal/mol for 4c and 4a to −6.10 to −6.20 Kcal/mol for 6b and 6a. Furthermore, the docking data showed that 4c and 4a are good Mpro inhibitors. Moreover, the drug-likeness studies, including Lipinski’s rule and ADMET properties, were also assessed. Interestingly, the organoselenium candidates manifested solid pharmacokinetic qualities in the ADMET studies. Overall, the results demonstrated that the organoselenium-based Schiff bases might serve as possible drugs for the COVID-19 epidemic. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

10 pages, 505 KiB  
Review
Africa (COVID-19) Vaccine Technology Transfer: Where Are We?
by Elijah Kolawole Oladipo, Seun Elijah Olufemi, Taiwo Ooreoluwa Ojo, Daniel Adewole Adediran, Akindele Felix Idowu, Usman Abiodun Idowu and Helen Onyeaka
Life 2023, 13(9), 1886; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13091886 - 9 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1697
Abstract
The rampant spread of the COVID-19 infection poses a grave and formidable challenge to global healthcare, with particular concern to the inhabitants of the African continent. In response to these pressing concerns, different strategies have been employed to combat the emergence of this [...] Read more.
The rampant spread of the COVID-19 infection poses a grave and formidable challenge to global healthcare, with particular concern to the inhabitants of the African continent. In response to these pressing concerns, different strategies have been employed to combat the emergence of this insidious disease, encompassing crucial measures such as physical distancing, the utilization of face masks, meticulous hand hygiene, and widespread vaccination campaigns. Nevertheless, the economic realities faced by numerous African nations, characterized by their classification as “low-income countries (LICs)”, present a formidable barrier to accessing and distributing approved vaccines to their populations. Moreover, it is essential to discuss the hesitancy of the European Union (EU) in releasing intellectual property rights associated with the transfer of vaccine technology to Africa. While the EU has been a key player in global efforts to combat the pandemic, there has been reluctance in sharing valuable knowledge and resources with African countries. This hesitancy raises concerns about equitable vaccine access and the potential for a prolonged health crisis in Africa. This review underscores the urgent imperative and need of establishing localized vaccine development and production facilities within Africa, necessitating the active involvement of governments and collaborative partnerships to achieve this crucial objective. Furthermore, this review advocates for the exploration of viable avenues for the transfer of vaccine technology as a means to facilitate equitable vaccine access across the African continent and also the cruciality and the need for the EU to reconsider its stance and actively engage in transferring vaccine technology to Africa through sharing intellectual property. The EU can contribute to the establishment of localized vaccine production facilities on the continent, which will not only increase vaccine availability but also promote self-sufficiency and resilience in the face of future health emergencies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

11 pages, 254 KiB  
Protocol
Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with Plasma from COVID-19-Recovered Individuals
by Mari Terada, Sho Saito, Satoshi Kutsuna, Noriko Kinoshita-Iwamoto, Tomiteru Togano, Akira Hangaishi, Katsuyuki Shiratori, Yuki Takamatsu, Kenji Maeda, Yukihito Ishizaka, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Masahiro Satake, Hiroaki Mitsuya and Norio Ohmagari
Life 2023, 13(11), 2184; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112184 - 9 Nov 2023
Viewed by 943
Abstract
Convalescent plasma therapy, which involves administering plasma from recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients to infected individuals, is being explored as a potential treatment for severe cases of COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy in [...] Read more.
Convalescent plasma therapy, which involves administering plasma from recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients to infected individuals, is being explored as a potential treatment for severe cases of COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma therapy in COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe illness. An open-label, single-arm intervention study was conducted without a control group. Plasma collected from recovered COVID-19 patients was administered to eligible participants. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were placed on artificial ventilation or died within 14 days of transfusion. Secondary endpoints included clinical improvement, viral load measurements, and adverse event monitoring. A total of 59 cases were included in the study. The primary endpoint was evaluated by comparing the rate obtained in the study to an existing rate of 25%. The study also assessed clinical improvement, viral load changes, and safety endpoints through adverse event monitoring. Convalescent plasma therapy shows potential as a treatment option for COVID-19. This study aimed to provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of this therapy and may contribute to its future use in treating severe cases of COVID-19. Full article
13 pages, 1292 KiB  
Systematic Review
An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between the De Ritis Ratio and Disease Severity and Mortality in Patients with COVID-19
by Arduino A. Mangoni and Angelo Zinellu
Life 2023, 13(6), 1324; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13061324 - 5 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1511
Abstract
Patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often have elevations in markers of liver injury, particularly serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT). Such alterations may affect the AST/ALT ratio (De Ritis ratio) and, potentially, clinical outcomes. We conducted an updated systematic review [...] Read more.
Patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often have elevations in markers of liver injury, particularly serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT). Such alterations may affect the AST/ALT ratio (De Ritis ratio) and, potentially, clinical outcomes. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the De Ritis ratio and COVID-19 severity and mortality in hospitalized patients. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched between 1 December 2019 and 15 February 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation were used to assess the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence, respectively. Twenty-four studies were identified. The De Ritis ratio on admission was significantly higher in patients with severe disease and non-survivors vs. patients with non-severe disease and survivors (15 studies, weighted mean difference = 0.36, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.49, p < 0.001). The De Ritis ratio was also associated with severe disease and/or mortality using odds ratios (1.83, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.39, p ˂ 0.001; nine studies). Similar results were observed using hazard ratios (2.36, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.79, p = 0.017; five studies). In six studies, the pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.677 (95% CI 0.612 to 0.743). In our systematic review and meta-analysis, higher De Ritis ratios were significantly associated with severe disease and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the De Ritis ratio can be useful for early risk stratification and management in this patient group (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023406916). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop