Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
5.2
3.4
Journals
Materials
Special Issues
Materials and Devices for Multidisciplinary Dental Treatments
materials-logo
Submit to Special Issue Submit Abstract to Special Issue Review for Materials Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Materials and Devices for Multidisciplinary Dental Treatments

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 July 2024 | Viewed by 3122

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Saverio Cosola

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatologic Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, 55041 Camaiore, Italy
Interests: oral surgery; periodontal disease; dental implants; dental materials; alveolar bone; dental prostheses; finite element analysis; fixed prostheses; periimplantitis
Dr. Riccardo Aiuto

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan - Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, 20122 Milan, Italy
Interests: oral surgery; periodontal disease; dental implants; periimplantitis; restorative dentistry; root canal treatment; dental materials; biomaterials
Prof. Dr. Annamaria Genovesi

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatologic Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, 55041 Camaiore, Italy
Interests: periodontal disease; dental implants; non-surgical periodontal therapy; chronic periodontitis; anti-bacterial agents; dental materials; finite element analysis; periimplantitis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The last twenty years have been characterized by a real revolution and evolution involving the knowledge of materials and technology in the field of oral health. The different available diagnostic instruments and the modern devices to treat soft and hard tissues have changed to include various concepts of diagnosis and treatment plans to reach good oral health. Starting right from the diagnosis, new technologies have undoubtedly changed the practice of some dental treatments, leading not only to an improvement in performance but also to the success of the dental practice, understood as a commercial enterprise, thanks also to a substantial reduction in costs, meaning that more treatments are possible for a larger number of patients. We are pleased to invite you to submit a paper in this area of research that is very important in our clinical dentistry nowadays.  This Special Issue aims to report what materials and devices are offering an important role in the treatments of different branches of dentistry. In this scenario, a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis, treatments and management should be mandatory, with fewer complicances, a predictable follow-up, and using the new technology of dental medicine.

Dr. Saverio Cosola
Dr. Riccardo Aiuto
Prof. Dr. Annamaria Genovesi
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • dental materials
  • dental devices
  • multidisciplinary treatment
  • periodontal diseases
  • multidisciplinary dental treatment
  • maintenance of oral health
  • aesthetic
  • prostheses
  • oral health
  • complex patients
  • prostheses
  • dental implants
  • non-surgical periodontal therapy
  • technologies
  • anti-bacterial agents

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

19 pages, 650 KiB  
Review
3D Printed Materials for Permanent Restorations in Indirect Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry: A Critical Review of the Literature
by Dario Balestra, Morgan Lowther, Cecilia Goracci, Mauro Mandurino, Silvia Cortili, Gaetano Paolone, Chris Louca and Alessandro Vichi
Materials 2024, 17(6), 1380; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061380 - 18 Mar 2024
Viewed by 778
Abstract
The objective of this study was to review the scientific evidence currently available on 3D printable materials and 3D printing technologies used for the fabrication of permanent restorations, focusing on material properties that are clinically relevant. A literature search was performed on four [...] Read more.
The objective of this study was to review the scientific evidence currently available on 3D printable materials and 3D printing technologies used for the fabrication of permanent restorations, focusing on material properties that are clinically relevant. A literature search was performed on four databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) for articles published from January 2013 until November 2023, using a combination of free words: (restorative dentistry OR prosthetic dentistry) AND (3D printing OR additive manufacturing OR rapid prototyping) AND materials. Two reviewers screened titles and/or abstracts of 2.468 unique studies. In total, 83 studies were selected for full-text reading, from which 36 were included in the review. The assessed variables were mechanical properties, reporting in most of the cases positive results, dimensional accuracy and fit, reporting conflicting results with a predominance of positive, aesthetic properties, with positive reports but scarcely addressed, and biological properties, almost unexplored in independent studies. Despite numerous studies with positive results in favor, papers with negative outcomes were also retrieved. Aesthetic and biological properties are conversely still mostly unexplored. There remains a lack of conclusive evidence for viable 3D printable restorative and prosthodontic materials for permanent restorations. Research should be strengthened by defining international standards for laboratory testing and, where pre-clinical data are promising, conducting clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials and Devices for Multidisciplinary Dental Treatments)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 436 KiB  
Review
Soft Tissue Substitutes in Periodontal and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review
by Roberto Rotundo, Gian Luca Pancrazi, Alessia Grassi, Lara Ceresoli, Giovanna Laura Di Domenico and Vanessa Bonafede
Materials 2024, 17(5), 1221; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051221 - 06 Mar 2024
Viewed by 718
Abstract
Background: Different extracellular matrix (ECM)-based technologies in periodontal and peri-implant soft tissue augmentation have been proposed in the market. The present review compared the efficacy of soft tissue substitutes (STSs) and autogenous free gingival grafts (FGGs) or connective tissue grafts (CTGs) in mucogingival [...] Read more.
Background: Different extracellular matrix (ECM)-based technologies in periodontal and peri-implant soft tissue augmentation have been proposed in the market. The present review compared the efficacy of soft tissue substitutes (STSs) and autogenous free gingival grafts (FGGs) or connective tissue grafts (CTGs) in mucogingival procedures to increase keratinized tissue (KT) width around teeth and implants. Methods: Two independent examiners performed an electronic search on MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library based on the following PICOS format: (P) adult patients; (I) soft tissue substitutes and FGGs/CTGs; (C) STSs vs. CTGs; STSs vs. FGGs; STSs vs control; (O) KT width gain; (S) systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials. Studies published before November 2023 were included. Results: Around teeth, all biomaterials showed superior performance compared to a coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone for treating gingival recessions. However, when compared to CTGs, acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) yield the most similar outcomes to the gold standard (CTGs), even though in multiple recessions, CTGs continue to be considered the most favorable approach. The use of STSs (acellular matrix or tissue-engineered) in combination with apically positioned flaps (APF) resulted in significantly less gain in KT width compared to that achieved with FGGs and APFs. Around dental implants, free gingival grafts were deemed more effective than soft tissue substitutes in enhancing keratinized mucosa width. Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, questions remain about the alternative use of soft tissue substitutes for conventional grafting procedures using free gingival grafts or connective tissue grafts around teeth and implants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials and Devices for Multidisciplinary Dental Treatments)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 482 KiB  
Review
Translucency of Lithium-Based Silicate Glass–Ceramics Blocks for CAD/CAM Procedures: A Narrative Review
by Alessandro Vichi, Zejiao Zhao, Mahdi Mutahar, Gaetano Paolone and Chris Louca
Materials 2023, 16(19), 6441; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16196441 - 27 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1058
Abstract
Amid chairside CAD/CAM materials, the use of lithium-based silicate glass–ceramics (LSGC) has been steadily increasing. This review aims to report on the translucency of these materials and the variables used to measure it. An electronic search was performed within the PubMed database within [...] Read more.
Amid chairside CAD/CAM materials, the use of lithium-based silicate glass–ceramics (LSGC) has been steadily increasing. This review aims to report on the translucency of these materials and the variables used to measure it. An electronic search was performed within the PubMed database within the period between 2 June 2011 and 11 September 2022. English-language papers investigating the translucency of IPS e.max CAD, Celtra Duo, Suprinity PC, Initial LiSi Block, Amber Mill, N!ce, and CEREC Tessera LSGC CAD/blocks were included in the search strategy. After an initial retrieval of 160 papers, the application of exclusion criteria, and the screening of abstracts and then of full texts, 33 papers were included in the study. The retrieved materials, with different degrees of translucency (LT, HT), were IPS e.max CAD (n = 33), Suprinity PC (n = 8), and Celtra Duo (n = 1). Concerning the examined colors, the most used was A2 (n = 20), followed by A1 (n = 8) and A3 (n = 2). The translucency parameter (TP) was the most used method (n = 30) with respect to the contrast ratio (CR) (n = 11) to assess translucency. Five papers measured both. Several specimens’ thicknesses (0.5–4 mm) were investigated, with 1 mm (n = 23) being the most frequently analyzed. While a general tendency could be identified, conflicting results among different papers were reported. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials and Devices for Multidisciplinary Dental Treatments)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop