Meningococcal Disease in the Era of Multivalent Vaccines: Where Are We Now and Can We Do Better?

A special issue of Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817). This special issue belongs to the section "Vaccines and Therapeutic Developments".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 October 2021) | Viewed by 9738

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
Interests: meningococcus; plague; Q fever; enteric fever; pertussis; Respiratory Syncitial Virus; vaccines

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

With the development and deployment of vaccines covering most of the Neisseria meningitidis capsular groups causing invasive meningococcal disease (IMD), there is a real opportunity to drastically reduce the disease burden all over the world. IMD is a leading cause of severe bacterial infection in infants and adolescents, causing death and severe sequelae in many countries, including in the Western world. This is partly linked with the speed at which the disease can progress, as it notoriously can kill an otherwise healthy person in a matter of a few days or even hours, and consequently, the death rate has remained the same for decades despite progress in diagnosis and treatment. Vaccination is thus considered the most efficient way to prevent the death and disability caused by IMD, and the ultimate weapon to defeat this devastating disease.

Several vaccines have been developed and are available against most capsular groups causing disease: groups A, B, C, W, and Y, alone or combined into multivalent formulations. Several of these vaccines are included in the immunization schedule of many countries, but not all. For example, the UK has included a vaccine against capsular group B meningococcus (MenB) in their immunization schedule, but only for infants, thus not reaching the other age group most affected by IMD, adolescents. Moreover, limited resources are constraining the use of meningococcal vaccines in developing countries. Therefore, in an era where so many vaccines are available, epidemiological surveillance, at country or regional levels, is key to efficient selection, use, and deployment strategies of meningococcal vaccines, so that strategies can be adapted and fine-tuned to specific situations. A key factor of the meningococcal conjugate vaccines’ success is their ability to induce herd protection, but there is to date no evidence that the most recent, protein-based vaccines against MenB can influence the acquisition and carriage of the bacteria. Clarifying the impact of this finding on the cost effectiveness of an adolescent program is of paramount importance. Finally, with IMD causing strains not covered by any of the currently available vaccines, is there room for further new and improved vaccines, and if so, which modalities are most promising.

The focus of this Special Issue is thus to understand the impact of the available vaccine strategies in different settings, to understand the contribution, or lack of, herd protection to the effectiveness of vaccination programs in particular in the context of the MenB protein-based vaccines, to understand how the cost and uptake of combination vaccines could further change the epidemiology of IMD, and to consider the need for further vaccine development, and finally how the advent of new technologies can contribute to further understanding of the disease, as well as to the development of new treatment or prevention approaches.

Prof. Christine S. Rollier
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Pathogens is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Neisseria meningitidis
  • Meningococcal infection
  • Meningococcal carriage
  • Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD)
  • Meningococcal vaccines
  • Conjugate vaccines

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 2537 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Critical Quality Attributes of a Pentavalent (A, C, Y, W, X) Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine for Global Use
by Barbara Bolgiano, Eilís Moran, Nicola J. Beresford, Fang Gao, Rory Care, Trusha Desai, Ida Karin Nordgren, Timothy R. Rudd, Ian M. Feavers, Prashant Bore, Sushil Patni, Vinay Gavade, Asha Mallya, Sameer Kale, Pankaj Sharma, Sunil K. Goel, Sunil Gairola, Suhas Hattarki, Nikhil Avalaskar, Annamraju D. Sarma, Marc LaForce, Neil Ravenscroft, Lakshmi Khandke, Mark R. Alderson, Rajeev M. Dhere and Sambhaji S. Pisaladd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Pathogens 2021, 10(8), 928; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10080928 - 23 Jul 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3393
Abstract
Towards achieving the goal of eliminating epidemic outbreaks of meningococcal disease in the African meningitis belt, a pentavalent glycoconjugate vaccine (NmCV-5) has been developed to protect against Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, C, Y, W and X. MenA and X polysaccharides are conjugated to [...] Read more.
Towards achieving the goal of eliminating epidemic outbreaks of meningococcal disease in the African meningitis belt, a pentavalent glycoconjugate vaccine (NmCV-5) has been developed to protect against Neisseria meningitidis serogroups A, C, Y, W and X. MenA and X polysaccharides are conjugated to tetanus toxoid (TT) while MenC, Y and W polysaccharides are conjugated to recombinant cross reactive material 197 (rCRM197), a non-toxic genetic variant of diphtheria toxin. This study describes quality control testing performed by the manufacturer, Serum Institute of India Private Limited (SIIPL), and the independent control laboratory of the U.K. (NIBSC) on seven clinical lots of the vaccine to ensure its potency, purity, safety and consistency of its manufacturing. In addition to monitoring upstream-manufactured components, samples of drug substance, final drug product and stability samples were evaluated. This paper focuses on the comparison of the vaccine’s critical quality attributes and reviews key indicators of its stability and immunogenicity. Comparable results were obtained by the two laboratories demonstrating sufficient levels of polysaccharide O-acetylation, consistency in size of the bulk conjugate molecules, integrity of the conjugated saccharides in the drug substance and drug product, and acceptable endotoxin content in the final drug product. The freeze-dried vaccine in 5-dose vials was stable based on molecular sizing and free saccharide assays. Lot-to-lot manufacturing consistency was also demonstrated in preclinical studies for polysaccharide-specific IgG and complement-dependent serum bactericidal activity for each serogroup. This study demonstrates the high quality and stability of NmCV-5, which is now undergoing Phase 3 clinical trials in Africa and India. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2673 KiB  
Article
Neisseria meningitidis Factor H Binding Protein Surface Exposure on Salmonella Typhimurium GMMA Is Critical to Induce an Effective Immune Response against Both Diseases
by Francesca Necchi, Giuseppe Stefanetti, Renzo Alfini, Elena Palmieri, Martina Carducci, Roberta Di Benedetto, Fabiola Schiavo, Maria Grazia Aruta, Fabiola Giusti, Ilaria Ferlenghi, Yun Shan Goh, Simona Rondini and Francesca Micoli
Pathogens 2021, 10(6), 726; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060726 - 9 Jun 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2611
Abstract
GMMA, outer membrane vesicles resulting from hyperblebbing mutated bacterial strains, are a versatile vaccine platform for displaying both homologous and heterologous antigens. Periplasmic expression is a popular technique for protein expression in the lumen of the blebs. However, the ability of internalized antigens [...] Read more.
GMMA, outer membrane vesicles resulting from hyperblebbing mutated bacterial strains, are a versatile vaccine platform for displaying both homologous and heterologous antigens. Periplasmic expression is a popular technique for protein expression in the lumen of the blebs. However, the ability of internalized antigens to induce antibody responses has not been extensively investigated. Herein, the Neisseria meningitidis factor H binding protein (fHbp) was heterologously expressed in the lumen of O-antigen positive (OAg+) and O-antigen negative (OAg−) Salmonella Typhimurium GMMA. Only the OAg− GMMA induced an anti-fHbp IgG response in mice if formulated on Alum, although it was weak and much lower compared to the recombinant fHbp. The OAg− GMMA on Alum showed partial instability, with possible exposure of fHbp to the immune system. When we chemically conjugated fHbp to the surface of both OAg+ and OAg− GMMA, these constructs induced a stronger functional response compared to the fHbp immunization alone. Moreover, the OAg+ GMMA construct elicited a strong response against both the target antigens (fHbp and OAg), with no immune interference observed. This result suggests that antigen localization on GMMA surface can play a critical role in the induction of an effective immune response and can encourage the development of GMMA based vaccines delivering key protective antigens on their surface. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 273 KiB  
Review
Exploring the Ability of Meningococcal Vaccines to Elicit Mucosal Immunity: Insights from Humans and Mice
by Elissa G. Currie and Scott D. Gray-Owen
Pathogens 2021, 10(7), 906; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070906 - 18 Jul 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2786
Abstract
Neisseria meningitidis causes a devastating invasive disease but is also a normal colonizer of the human nasopharynx. Due to the rapid progression of disease, the best tool to protect individuals against meningococcal infections is immunization. Clinical experience with polysaccharide conjugate vaccines has revealed [...] Read more.
Neisseria meningitidis causes a devastating invasive disease but is also a normal colonizer of the human nasopharynx. Due to the rapid progression of disease, the best tool to protect individuals against meningococcal infections is immunization. Clinical experience with polysaccharide conjugate vaccines has revealed that an ideal meningococcal vaccine must prevent both invasive disease and nasal colonization, which confers herd immunity. However, not all meningococcal vaccines are equal in their ability to prevent nasal colonization, for unknown reasons. Herein, we describe recent efforts to utilize humanized mouse models to understand the impact of different meningococcal vaccines on nasal colonization. These mice are susceptible to nasal colonization, and they become immune following live nasal infection or immunization with matched capsule-conjugate or protein-based vaccines, replicating findings from human work. We bring together insights regarding meningococcal colonization and immunity from clinical work with findings using humanized mouse models, providing new perspective into the different determinants of mucosal versus systemic immunity. Then, we use this as a framework to help focus future studies toward understanding key mechanistic aspects left unresolved, including the bacterial factors required for colonization and immune evasion, determinants of nasal mucosal protection, and characteristics of an ideal meningococcal vaccine. Full article
Back to TopTop