Ostracism in Ancient and Contemporary Times

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 3926

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Political and Social Sciences, Università di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, BO, Italy
Interests: Aristotle; Platonic dialogue; minority rights; toleration; respect; theories of solidarity

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In Ancient Greece, ostracism represented a practice of exclusion and a legalized form of exile from the city which political leaders could employ as an extreme remedy against their rivals’ accumulation of personal power. In virtue of that procedure, any citizen who, because of his eminent political powers, talents, and/or material resources, was perceived as a potential threat to the stability of the polis could be banished by popular vote from his city-state for several years. At the time, no permanent loss of status or social stigma used to befall those who suffered ostracism at the end of their exile, nor were they deprived of the right to enjoy income from their property at the time of coming back to their native cities. By attempting to restore an idea of “symmetric” equality, ancient ostracism could be understood as a strategic tool designed to strengthen democratic citizenship and a more active participation of the dēmos in political life. 

The aim of this Special Issue is to explore possible philosophic articulations of the idea of ostracism in ancient and contemporary times by attempting to answer the following questions (and not only these): 1) Can ancient theories of ostracism contribute to an understanding of supposed contemporary practices of exclusion? Could phenomena like so-called cancel culture be framed in terms of “modern ostracism”? If so, which evaluative criteria might determine—or fail to determine—the liberal democratic legitimacy of the social and/or political uses of that practice? What relationships might be established between democracy, populism, and practices of the removal of ideals and persons? How do supposed practices of ostracism of powerful leaders work in the digital era? Can they be justified? Is being banned from a social media a form of ostracism? Finally, could philosophical theories of emotion frame modern cases of ostracism? 

Dr. Elena Irrera
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ostracism
  • Ancient Greece
  • cancel culture
  • exclusion
  • social stigma
  • digital culture
  • populism
  • democratic participation

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

26 pages, 446 KiB  
Article
It Had to Be You: Carl Schmitt on Exclusion and Political Reasoning
by Andrés Rosler
Philosophies 2024, 9(2), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9020048 - 10 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1305
Abstract
In this paper, I would like to tackle first Schmitt’s defence of the role of exclusion in political reasoning and his attendant rejection of extreme political pluralism. I shall then move on to explain not only why there is nothing Nazi—or even antisemitic—about [...] Read more.
In this paper, I would like to tackle first Schmitt’s defence of the role of exclusion in political reasoning and his attendant rejection of extreme political pluralism. I shall then move on to explain not only why there is nothing Nazi—or even antisemitic—about Schmitt’s concept of the political, but rather the other way around: Schmitt’s concept of the political not only must have been used against National Socialism but it did not fail to have his fair share of Jewish, or at the very least Zionist, enthusiasts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ostracism in Ancient and Contemporary Times)
21 pages, 508 KiB  
Article
Pruning of the People: Ostracism and the Transformation of the Political Space in Ancient Athens
by Emily Salamanca
Philosophies 2023, 8(5), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8050081 - 31 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1704
Abstract
Athenian ostracism has long captured democratic imaginations because it seems to present clear evidence of a people (demos) routinely asserting collective power over tyrannical elites. In recent times, ostracism has been particularly alluring to militant democrats, who see the institution as [...] Read more.
Athenian ostracism has long captured democratic imaginations because it seems to present clear evidence of a people (demos) routinely asserting collective power over tyrannical elites. In recent times, ostracism has been particularly alluring to militant democrats, who see the institution as an ancient precursor to modern militant democratic mechanisms such as social media bans, impeachment measures, and lustration procedures, which serve to protect democratic constitutions from anti-democratic threats. Such a way of conceptualizing ostracism ultimately stems from Aristotle’s “rule of proportion,” or the removal of “outstanding” individuals in a polity who threaten to disturb the achievement of communal eudaimonia (Aris. Pol. 1284a). However, this way of interpreting the institution only presents a truncated view, one which is overly centered on the ultimate expulsion of an individual from the polity, rather than on its broader contextual telos—the transformation of the ostracized individual and of the community. To move past this simplified view, this paper considers all elements of ostracism with equal force, and argues that ostracism offered a shared opportunity and shared space for all members of the polis—citizens, non-citizens, and elite members alike—to reform the character of the subject individual and to instill and reaffirm democratic values in the community. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ostracism in Ancient and Contemporary Times)
Back to TopTop