Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
1.1
0.8
Journals
Religions
Special Issues
How Christianity Affects Public Policy
share announcement

How Christianity Affects Public Policy

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2025 | Viewed by 4642

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Bernard James Mauser

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Philosophy Department, Southern Evangelical Seminary, Charlotte, NC 28277, USA
Interests: Christian faith

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The fields of religion, public policy, public administration, and its development have been interrelated throughout history. The context of how Christianity has shaped the area of public policy, law, administration, and behavior has great significance. This Special Issue allows scholars with various viewpoints to share developments in their work and research to help promote the advancement of scholarship in the interrelationship of these disciplines on the Christian influence on Public Policy.

We are pleased to invite you to contribute to this issue in sharing your research from the different disciplines which include public administration, economics, social work, philosophy, political science, theology, public choice theory, Austrian economics, and law as it relates to how Christianity influences or has influenced policy. There are a range of topics to which this can extend which is not limited to approaches of the death penalty, abortion, taxation, euthanasia, war and peace, along with many other issues that concern our society. We invite contributions that can be beneficial in advancing our knowledge and understanding in these areas and others that are pertinent as it relates to them. In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome.

The ultimate purpose of this Special Issue is to contribute to the body of knowledge about how Christianity may continue to contribute and speak to these areas and even how we may have to recognize the debates within different Christian traditions as it relates to policies going forward.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Bernard James Mauser
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religion
  • economics
  • political science
  • political philosophy
  • public Health
  • government
  • social welfare and social work
  • sociology & social history
  • law
  • education

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 286 KiB  
Article
Christian Citizens in a Democratic State: Is a True Separation of Church and State Really Possible?
by David Haines
Religions 2024, 15(3), 262; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030262 - 21 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1679
Abstract
In many North American Protestant circles, especially those with Baptist or Free Church roots, the notion of the total separation of church and state is presented as the ideal to be attained in all church and state relations. We are told that the [...] Read more.
In many North American Protestant circles, especially those with Baptist or Free Church roots, the notion of the total separation of church and state is presented as the ideal to be attained in all church and state relations. We are told that the state should have no legislative power to ordain anything in relation to church doctrine or practice, and that the church should be entirely excluded from all political, secular, or state actions. In this paper, we are going to suggest that such an approach to church–state relations (even though some might think that it flows from or is necessary for democracy) is, in fact, impossible in a true democracy. We will first consider the nature of the church and the state, and present three principles that Maritain suggests are first principles in this debate. We will then look at the classical notion of the “Citizen”. We will conclude by arguing that based upon the nature of a citizen, of the church, and of the state, a strict separation of church and state is, in fact, impossible. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue How Christianity Affects Public Policy)
8 pages, 165 KiB  
Article
A Moderate Proposal: Jonathan Dickinson and Benjamin Franklin Debate Freedom, Conscience, and Consensus
by Rusty Roberson
Religions 2024, 15(1), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010121 - 17 Jan 2024
Viewed by 869
Abstract
In matters of twenty-first century public policy, age-old questions surrounding freedom of conscience and both personal and civic liberties remain in perennial tension with the necessary demands for civic conformity, custom, and consensus. These questions were also of critical importance in early eighteenth-century [...] Read more.
In matters of twenty-first century public policy, age-old questions surrounding freedom of conscience and both personal and civic liberties remain in perennial tension with the necessary demands for civic conformity, custom, and consensus. These questions were also of critical importance in early eighteenth-century colonial America. In the first half of the eighteenth century, a hotbed of religious, intellectual, and cultural diversity was fomenting considerable conflict in Philadelphia, setting the stage for a vital debate over the nature and parameters of religious liberty and freedom of conscience in the colonies. Within this context of the eighteenth-century religious and cultural landscape of colonial Philadelphia, this article will examine a debate between Jonathan Dickinson and Benjamin Franklin whereby two distinctly different interpretations of religious liberty and freedom of conscience were established. Left to themselves, these two interpretations lead to sharply divergent trajectories. Nonetheless, by considering these two viewpoints in dialogue with one another, the Franklin–Dickinson pamphlet debate can serve as a useful tool for conceptualizing twenty-first century public policy issues related to freedom of conscience: policies that preserve the essential aspects of what constitutes each person’s humanity while simultaneously respecting the broader exigencies for public order and responsible policy in the aggregate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue How Christianity Affects Public Policy)
20 pages, 303 KiB  
Article
A Libertarian Anarchist Analysis of Norman Geisler’s Philosophy of Government
by Anthony Michael Miller
Religions 2024, 15(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010023 - 22 Dec 2023
Viewed by 1551
Abstract
There are numerous approaches and conclusions regarding church and state relations and how Christianity affects public policy. Yet the purpose of this study is to question some of the philosophical assumptions and biblical interpretations that Christians hold to which support the state as [...] Read more.
There are numerous approaches and conclusions regarding church and state relations and how Christianity affects public policy. Yet the purpose of this study is to question some of the philosophical assumptions and biblical interpretations that Christians hold to which support the state as a morally legitimate authoritative institution in the first place. This article will argue that various presuppositions regarding the state’s moral legitimacy are untenable, if not self-refuting. The philosophical commitments of a form of Christian Conservatism exemplified by Norman L. Geisler will be analyzed and critiqued by the Christian Libertarian Anarchist school of thought, represented by Gerard Casey. Geisler’s views on first principles, God’s moral law, social contracts, consent, anarchy, the distinction between vices and crimes, preconditions for virtue, and the common good will be examined. Then, Geisler’s interpretation of classic biblical texts supporting the alleged moral legitimacy of the state will also be assessed. This article will contend that if one were to consistently apply some pertinent principles found in Geisler’s prolegomena to theology when reasoning from natural revelation and the relevant biblical data, one will find that the conclusions are more compatible with the political theology of Christian Libertarian Anarchism. Hence the one who questions how Christianity affects public policy should take into consideration the reasons to deny that divine revelation affirms the state as a morally legitimate authoritative institution. If this is the case, the question ought to be reframed to determine how Christianity affects public policy within a state that has no legitimate moral grounds for authority. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue How Christianity Affects Public Policy)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: THE IMAGO DEI AND THE MARKET ECONOMY: LIBERTARIAN TENSIONS IN MICHAEL NOVAK’S POLITICAL THEOLOGY
Author: Yonts
Highlights: For Michael Novak, the Imago Dei provides the strongest account for the relationship between the market economy, human dignity, and natural rights. Rationalistic theories, such as those within libertarianism, cannot adequately ground human dignity or sustain free institutions capable of serving the common good, the market economy, and political liberty.

Back to TopTop