Religion, Spirituality and Medicine: Insights into Contemporary Perspectives

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2024 | Viewed by 4798

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
Interests: social theory and religion; religions and economy; sociology of religious organizations; sociological neo-institutionalism in the religious field; sociology of religions (religion and modernity; contemporary spirituality and new religious movements; women and religions; monasticism; atheism)

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
Interests: social theory; power and apprenticeship; yoga pedagogies; sociology of religion; sociology of knowledge; sociology of the body; health and salvation nexus

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The study of the relationships between religion, spirituality, and medicine is an important and expanding field of study, especially in the light of the recent COVID-19 pandemic, which stressed the need to support healthcare professionals, patients, and their families in a time of exceptional social, healthcare, and psychological disruption. The pandemic was accompanied by a deep, widespread sense of fear, isolation, and existential uncertainty that gave rise to—especially on the part of patients admitted to intensive care units and their families—an unprecedented demand for holistic care focused not only on the body but also on psychosocial and spiritual aspects.

The joint care of body and soul, so dramatically underlined by the COVID-19 pandemic, is essential in all religions and spiritual disciplines, and, more implicitly, all healing practices, such as acupuncture, Ayurveda, and traditional medicines from many regions and cultures around the globe. Western medicine is the great exception in that its history is characterized, in its orthodox versions, by the radical opposition between scientific and spiritual/religious discourse, and consequently between standardized clinical intervention and the care of the soul. As Foucault shows, in his 'Naissance de la Clinique’, in the new epistemological articulation of modernity, health and salvation are disjointed, thus leading to two main consequences: on the one hand, the growing legitimacy of the figure of the physician leads him to outflank and replace that of the priest, thus colonizing the field of the sacred with his expert knowledge; on the other hand, "disease becomes detached from the metaphysics of evil to which, for centuries, it had belonged" (Foucault 1969, 222), to become an object of relevance and discursive value in and of itself within a new configuration of knowledge about the body (Dei 2004, 10).

However, despite the dominance of this model of care based on the physician's expert scientific knowledge, and divorced from the therapeutic role of the sacred, since the 1960s, we have witnessed a process of re-enchantment of the world, that is, a "rebirth" of fascination with the sacred in a relationship with the divine that can be perceived as both immanent and transcendent. This sacralizing vision of life, and thus of nature, the human body, and the "invisible", has also meant a progressive rapprochement of the practical‒discursive universes of health and salvation, of which the recent COVID-19 pandemic is only one current form. Examples are the importance of the holistic framework typical of "New Age" and "contemporary spiritualities" (Palmisano and Pannofino 2020), and the centrality of the collective and miraculous healing practices of the Pentecostal and charismatic revival. Further examples are the success of so-called "alternative and complementary therapies" (CAM) and nonconventional medicines (MNCs) defined as such in reference to their development outside—or on the periphery of—Western biomedicine. In other words, as Schirripa (2012, 14) states, "the nexus between health and salvation, between the sphere of therapy and that of religion, seems to reassert itself in contemporary contexts with full force". More precisely, in today’s societies, specific conceptions of health, the sacred, and the political‒economic continuum compete to inform the legitimate culture of disparate fields, from medicine to religion and economics, where they intersect, overlap, and reciprocally challenge or inform each other (Di Placido, Strhan and Palmisano 2022).

The intersections between religion, spirituality, and medicine have so far been mainly discussed by nursing and medical scholars, although there is also a growing interest on the part of disciplines as diverse as medical humanities, anthropology, and sociology. Despite its pioneering role and its merits, this (mainly nursing and biomedical) literature relies on an a-historical and essentializing understanding of spirituality, without recognizing that “social discourses around spirituality and religion have commonalities” but also “differences across international contexts” (Pesut et al. 2008, 2804). We contend that the current conceptualizations of religion and spirituality in the healthcare literature and practice promote a simplified understanding of spirituality as substantial, individualized, and antithetical to traditional religions. This is largely due to the disciplinary lenses (of medicine and nursing and also partly psychology and theology) from which these conceptualizations arise and a lack of socio-historical understanding of the complexity and multilayered nature of categories such as religion and spirituality (Palmisano and Pannofino 2020). As a consequence, the paucity of sociological research on the relationships between religion, spirituality, and care of the body leaves the field open to the proliferation of partial readings devoid of historical, discursive, and practical accounts of the complex interactions among these fields in different places and historical periods (Di Placido and Palmisano 2023).

In this Special Issue, we are pleased to invite social science scholars to explore, discuss, and unveil the intersections of religion, spirituality, and medicine across geographical contexts, fields of practice, and through a plurality of methodological and theoretical perspectives. More specifically, we are interested in understanding whether and how the practical‒discursive universes of religion, spirituality, and medicine overlap, blur, and/or clash in specific case studies (e.g., public institutions, the holistic milieux, and religious groups and movements) and how social actors (e.g., hospital managements, healthcare professionals, patients, religious leaders, and spiritual seekers) navigate the porous boundaries between these disparate yet overlapping dimensions of life.

In this Special Issue, original research articles, theoretical contributions, and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following: 

  • Definitional issues of religion and spirituality in the practice of medicine.
  • The inclusion of spirituality in healthcare contexts.
  • The progressive role of therapeutic discourses in spiritual and religious practices and groups.
  • Religious and spiritual healing groups and modalities.
  • The governance of religious diversity in public institutions.
  • Exploration of the “health/salvation” nexus.
  • Perspectives and approaches to the study of religion, spirituality, and medicine.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200‒300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors, Professor Dr Stefania Palmisano ([email protected]) and Dr Matteo Di Placido ([email protected]), or to the Assistant Editor of Religions, Ms Margaret Liu ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purpose of ensuring that articles fit properly within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Deadline for abstract submissions: 30 September 2023
Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 November 2023

Prof. Dr. Stefania Palmisano
Dr. Matteo Di Placido
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religion
  • spirituality
  • medicine
  • health and salvation
  • sociology
  • sociology of religion
  • boundaries

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 341 KiB  
Article
Nonreligious Afterlife: Emerging Understandings of Death and Dying
by Chris Miller and Lori G. Beaman
Religions 2024, 15(1), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010104 - 13 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2437
Abstract
Death Cafés are informal events that bring people together for conversations about death and related issues. These events connect strangers from across a range of backgrounds, including healthcare workers, hospice volunteers, and funeral directors, among others. Based on an analysis of focus groups [...] Read more.
Death Cafés are informal events that bring people together for conversations about death and related issues. These events connect strangers from across a range of backgrounds, including healthcare workers, hospice volunteers, and funeral directors, among others. Based on an analysis of focus groups and interviews with Death Café attendees, this paper explores how participants construct and express conceptions of the process of dying and what happens after we die. Ideas about the afterlife have historically been shaped by a religious outlooks and identities. However, nonreligious lifestances have shifted how people understand death and dying. We suggest that notions of continuity of life are not the purview of religious people. Rather, participants in Death Cafés draw simultaneously on many ideas, and reveal ways of conceptualizing life after death—in various forms—without the guidance of religion. Based on conversations with attendees about their outlooks on death (and what may happen after death), our data reveals four main typologies of afterlife imaginaries, which we label cessation, unknown, energy, and transition. Among the diverse perspectives shared, we argue for the emergence of an immanent afterlife outlook. Full article
16 pages, 293 KiB  
Article
The Health/Salvation Nexus: Religion, New Forms of Spirituality, Medicine and the Problem of “Theodicy”
by Antonio Camorrino
Religions 2024, 15(1), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010097 - 11 Jan 2024
Viewed by 815
Abstract
The health/salvation nexus can be better understood if analyzed through the transformations that have affected the social relationship with the sacred in Western society. These changes have caused relevant implications concerning the sphere of “ultimate meaning”, in the words of Peter Berger. Today, [...] Read more.
The health/salvation nexus can be better understood if analyzed through the transformations that have affected the social relationship with the sacred in Western society. These changes have caused relevant implications concerning the sphere of “ultimate meaning”, in the words of Peter Berger. Today, we are witnessing a weakening of legitimized “theodicies” capable of promising—according to Max Weber—salvation and guaranteeing “just equalization”, that is, compensation or metaphysical condemnation for worldly conduct. However, this occurs to different extents depending on whether we are in the field of Western religions or new forms of spirituality. Medicine deserves a separate discussion. The hypothesis is that the health/salvation nexus leans towards salvation in the case of Western religions; towards health in the case of medicine; and, in the case of new forms of spirituality it leans neither exactly towards health nor exactly towards salvation: new forms of spirituality promise more than the achievement of health, but less than the achievement of salvation. Ultimately, the health/salvation nexus is structured differently depending on how much Western religions, new forms of spirituality and medicine are able to respond, more or less effectively, to the questions of “theodicy” and of “ultimate meaning”. I use the term of “theodicy” in the way Max Weber and Peter Berger conceived it: therefore, this concept can also be usefully applied to non-theistic and secular worldviews. Full article
16 pages, 276 KiB  
Article
“Since I’ve Been Ill, I Live Better”: The Emergence of Latent Spirituality in the Biographical Pathways of Illness
by Nicola Luciano Pannofino
Religions 2024, 15(1), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010090 - 11 Jan 2024
Viewed by 778
Abstract
Spirituality can be a crucial resource to draw on to make sense of critical situations that mark a turning point in individual and collective biographies. In these cases, a ritual and symbolic response to the trauma may occur, bringing to the surface a [...] Read more.
Spirituality can be a crucial resource to draw on to make sense of critical situations that mark a turning point in individual and collective biographies. In these cases, a ritual and symbolic response to the trauma may occur, bringing to the surface a «latent spirituality», that is, a tacit propensity towards the sacred that manifests itself in unexpected ways, even in those who do not normally believe or practice, in extraordinary situations that engender fear, anomie or disorientation and that have profound existential repercussions. This article aims to investigate the latent spirituality in the face of the critical event represented by the onset of severe disease, based on the analysis of spiritual illness narratives collected in Italy through qualitative interviews with oncological patients. The narratives show how the condition of suffering can bring to light an unexpressed spirituality, consisting of the revitalization of previous traditional faith or the elaboration of an innovative lay spirituality. Data confirm how pathology constitutes a biographical fracture, accompanied by questions and needs of a religious and spiritual nature. In contrast to the prevailing approach in the medical humanities where spirituality is interpreted as a starting resource to which sufferers resort to cope toward the disease, these results indicate that the spiritual dimension is an emerging aspect along the therapeutic pathway and that it is transformed by reflecting the temporality of the biographical experience of illness. Full article
Back to TopTop