Buddhist Monasticism and Lay Society

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 June 2019) | Viewed by 7693

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Languages and Cultures, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Gent, Belgium
Interests: Buddhist monasticism; vinaya; Buddhist material culture

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

While there has been a great deal of research into the philosophical, historical and philological development of Buddhism, the role of its main driving force – monastics – and the nature of their relationships with lay Buddhists have, until recently, attracted less attention. Of course, some exceptional masters and monastic travellers have been studied in detail, and their role in the development of Buddhism has been extensively discussed. Overall, however, Buddhist monastics in general and the manner in which they have engaged with the rest of society have been much less studied.

This volume focuses on Buddhist monastics’ interactions with lay society, both historically and in the contemporary world. Gregory Schopen has published a number of inspiring articles on this topic (such as those that appear in the anthology Buddhist Nuns, Monks, and Other Worldly Matters, 2014), while Shayne Clarke’s Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms (2013), Hao Chunwen’s work on Dunhuang, and an intriguing volume on Buddhism and law, edited by Rebecca French and Mark Nathan (2014), are also noteworthy. Much remains to be said, however, particularly on monastics’ and religious lay people’s attempts to establish significant political, social and cultural roles for themselves within wider society. Steven Vanderputten has addressed this issue in his work on European female monasticism (Dark Age Nunneries, 2018), which focuses on Roman Catholic communities’ attempts to preserve or even expand their influence by shaping the attitudes and behaviour of the laity, sometimes against the expectations and wishes of secular and indeed religious authorities. This volume aims to do much the same with respect to Buddhist monastics’ efforts to gain favour among both the common people and the elite. It includes contributions on Buddhist communities and individual actors who have engaged with lay society throughout history, as well as comparative essays that frame questions of active engagement across a number of regional settings or with reference to other religious traditions.

Prof. Ann Heirman
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Buddhist monasticism
  • Buddhist monastics
  • Buddhist agency
  • Buddhist laity

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 804 KiB  
Article
A Survey of the Japanese Influence on Buddhist Education in Taiwan during the Japanese Colonial Period (1895–1945)
by Pei-ying Lin
Religions 2020, 11(2), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020061 - 28 Jan 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3599
Abstract
This paper analyses the Japanese influence upon Taiwanese Buddhist communities during the Colonial Period. I will discuss the interplay between monasticism, education, and politics by examining the process of institutionalisation of monastics and Buddhist educational programs in Taiwan between 1895 and 1945. In [...] Read more.
This paper analyses the Japanese influence upon Taiwanese Buddhist communities during the Colonial Period. I will discuss the interplay between monasticism, education, and politics by examining the process of institutionalisation of monastics and Buddhist educational programs in Taiwan between 1895 and 1945. In accord with pertinent historical developments, this paper is divided into five sections: (1) the Sōtō Zen lineage, (2) the Rinzai Zen lineage, (3) the Pure Land (Jōdo) lineage, (4) Taiwanese monastics who studied in Japan, and (5) Taiwanese nuns. Based on the strong Japanese sectarian tradition, different sects had disparate strategies in Taiwan. The Sōtō lineage arrived first, engaged in precept ceremonies, and started up a well-run Buddhist college. The Myōshinji Sect of Rinzai took Kaiyuansi in Tainan as the main headquarters in southern Taiwan for teaching Buddhist classes as well as holding monumental precept-conferral ceremonies. As for the Pure Land lineage, they came slightly later but eventually established 37 branches across Taiwan, implementing social-educational programs actively. Finally, the nuns and monks who went abroad to study Buddhism in Japan matured and took important roles in advancing Buddhist education in Taiwan. All of these cases demonstrate a profound Japanese influence upon Taiwanese Buddhist education and monastic culture. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Buddhist Monasticism and Lay Society)
22 pages, 343 KiB  
Article
Corporate Bodies in Early South Asian Buddhism: Some Relics and Their Sponsors According to Epigraphy
by Matthew D. Milligan
Religions 2019, 10(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10010004 - 22 Dec 2018
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3430
Abstract
Some of the earliest South Asian Buddhist historical records pertain to the enshrinement of relics, some of which were linked to the Buddha and others associated with prominent monastic teachers and their pupils. Who were the people primarily responsible for these enshrinements? How [...] Read more.
Some of the earliest South Asian Buddhist historical records pertain to the enshrinement of relics, some of which were linked to the Buddha and others associated with prominent monastic teachers and their pupils. Who were the people primarily responsible for these enshrinements? How did the social status of these people represent Buddhism as a burgeoning institution? This paper utilizes early Prakrit inscriptions from India and Sri Lanka to reconsider who was interested in enshrining these relics and what, if any, connection they made have had with each other. Traditional accounts of reliquary enshrinement suggest that king Aśoka began the enterprise of setting up the Buddha’s corporeal body for worship but his own inscriptions cast doubt as to the importance he may have placed in the construction of stūpa-s and the widespread distribution of relics. Instead, as evidenced in epigraphy, inclusive corporations of individuals may have instigated, or, at the very least, became the torchbearers for, reliquary enshrinement as a salvific enterprise. Such corporations comprised of monastics as well as non-monastics and seemed to increasingly become more managerial over time. Eventually, culminating at places like Sanchi, the enshrinement of the corporeal remains of regionally famous monks partially supplanted the corporeal remains of the Buddha. Those interested in funding this new endeavor were corporations of relatives, monastic brethren, and others who were likely friends and immediate acquaintances. In the end, the social and corporate collectivity of early Buddhism may have outshined some textual monastic ideals of social isolation as it pertained to the planning, carrying out, and physical enshrinement of corporeal remains for worship, thus evoking an inclusive sentiment with the monastic institution rather than disassociation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Buddhist Monasticism and Lay Society)
Back to TopTop