Spirituality for Healthcare Quality Improvement: Reflections and Evidence from Research

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 May 2021) | Viewed by 2309

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Nursing Department, Nursing School of Porto, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
Interests: research in nursing; human development; self-care; management of signs and symptoms; nursing discipline and profession; training and management in nursing
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Healthcare has evolved exponentially in the past thirty years. Societies have invested like never before in the training of health professionals, in technologies, research, prevention, and in the production of new medicines. The provision of safe and quality healthcare has also become a goal for governments. Evidence from research further shows that there is a need to consider other non-drug dimensions in clinical settings, such as interactions, cultural skills, and spirituality.

These are areas that definitely contribute to quality of life but there are still doubts about how to make them a reality in healthcare contexts. This will be a comparative volume that features spirituality in healthcare, across religions, and across clinical conditions.

This volume will bring together some of the most current and ground-breaking work on spirituality in healthcare. The focus is on identifying innovative ways of dealing with spirituality in healthcare—identifying spiritual needs, spiritual well-being, spiritually competent interventions, respect for spirituality as a way of dignifying care, and the relationship between spirituality and the improvement of clinical conditions.

Spirituality, religion, and culture are different realities, just as the ways in which societies relate to religion are different. Spirituality refers to a notion of transcendence, hope in difficult times, belief in relationships with others, and the acceptance of certain inevitable processes in life. This reality has an effective translation in health contexts, as shown by the research carried out—and which must be reinforced in this area. Respecting or offering spiritually competent care helps people to accept limitations resulting from chronic illnesses, dependence on self-care or how to deal with signs and symptoms. Studies on palliative and end-of-life care show how spirituality can provide comfort to sick people and their families. Other studies show that spirituality is relevant for the preservation of the ability to care for family caregivers and for the prevention of despair, psychological distress, and burden. Other studies emphasize the relationship between the provision of spiritually competent care and adherence to the therapeutic regime. In the area of oncology, there is evidence that spirituality can have relevant effects on the immune system. In patients with dementia, respect for spiritual dimensions can—albeit in a very tenuous way—help people to remember important realities in their life.

This Special Issue of Religions provides a space to analyze this relationship between spirituality and healthcare. It is intended that the included studies may be relevant for healthcare training. Last but not least, we intend to help institutions to improve their quality systems, including spiritually competent interventions in care protocols.

Prof. Dr. Wilson Correia de Abreu
Prof. Dr. Fiona Timmins
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • adjustment to the disease
  • competent spiritual interventions
  • dependence on self-care
  • end-of-life care
  • healthcare
  • palliative care and spirituality

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 543 KiB  
Article
Similarities and Differences between Danish and American Physicians’ Religious Characteristics and Clinical Communication: Two Cross-Sectional Surveys
by Christian B. van Randwijk, Tobias Opsahl, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, Tobias Kvist Stripp, Lars Bjerrum, Jørn Herrstedt, Jens Søndergaard and Niels Christian Hvidt
Religions 2021, 12(2), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020116 - 11 Feb 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1784
Abstract
Many physicians remain reticent to initiate or partake in discussions about their patients’ religious and spiritual needs during the clinical encounter. Reasons for this may be insufficient time, capacity, education or training but may also be a product of variance in physicians’ own [...] Read more.
Many physicians remain reticent to initiate or partake in discussions about their patients’ religious and spiritual needs during the clinical encounter. Reasons for this may be insufficient time, capacity, education or training but may also be a product of variance in physicians’ own religious or spiritual characteristics. The aim of this paper was to compare American and Danish physicians’ religious characteristics, and to explore and compare American and Danish physicians’ attitudes towards, and practices of, integrating religiosity and spirituality in the clinical encounter. We included data from two cross-sectional surveys: an American survey conducted in 2002 (n = 2000) and a Danish survey conducted in 2012 (n = 1485) to test four hypotheses. American physicians were significantly more religious, they more frequently inquired about religious or spiritual issues in the clinical encounter and they found it more appropriate to discuss religious or spiritual issues if the patients brought it up when compared to Danish physicians. A weak to moderate positive correlation between level of religiosity and frequency of inquiring about religious and spiritual issues were found in both populations. The findings are discussed in relation to the clinical importance of ensuring that health care practices stay patient centered. The findings may especially be relevant to consider in increasingly ethnically and culturally diverse contexts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop