Examination of Website Language Strategies Adopted by Five-Star Hotels in China: A Corpus Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Website Evaluation
2.2. Tourism Discourse in Language Studies
3. Analytical Framework
3.1. Introduction to Appraisal Theory
3.2. Application of Appraisal Theory on Hotel Website Examination
4. Research Methodology
5. Findings and Discussion
5.1. Generational Text Statistics from Corpus Tool Coding
5.2. Generational Text Statistics from Featured Coding
6. Conclusions
6.1. Theoretical Contributions
6.2. Managerial Contributions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Heinrich, T.; Dai, S. Diversity of firm sizes, complexity, and industry structure in the Chinese economy. Struct. Chan. Econ. Dyn. 2015, 37, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tribe, J. The Economics of Recreation, Leisure and Tourism; Routledge: Oxon, UK, 2014; pp. 263–318. [Google Scholar]
- Page, S.J. Tourism Management; Routledge: Oxon, UK, 2014; pp. 75–104. [Google Scholar]
- Ip, C.; Law, R.; Lee, H.A. The evaluation of hotel website functionality by fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2012, 29, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y. Present and future hotel website marketing activities: Change propensity analysis. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 47, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, B.; Law, R.; Wen, I. The impact of website quality on customer satisfaction and purchase intentions: Evidence from Chinese online visitors. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2008, 27, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.; Nguyen, N.; Pervan, S. Development and validation of a scale measuring hotel website service quality (HwebSQ). Tour. Manag. Pers. 2020, 35, 100697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiou, W.C.; Lin, C.C.; Perng, C. A strategic framework for website evaluation based on a review of the literature from 1995–2006. Inf. Manag. 2010, 47, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Marsico, M.; Levialdi, S. Evaluating web sites: Exploiting user’s expectations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2004, 60, 381–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, Á. Framework for a global quality evaluation of a website. Online Inf. Rev. 2012, 36, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiou, W.C.; Lin, C.C.; Perng, C. A strategic website evaluation of online travel agencies. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 1463–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baki, R. Evaluating hotel websites through the use of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 13, 3747–3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law, R. Evaluation o hotel websites: Progress and future developments. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 76, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, S.; Law, R.; Buhalis, D. Who booked five-star hotels in Macau? A study of hotel guests’ online booking intention. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2013, 20, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leung, R.; Rong, J.; Li, G.; Law, R. Personality differences and hotel web design study using targeted positive and negative association rule mining. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2013, 22, 701–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Law, R.; Qi, S.; Leung, B. Perceptions of functionality and usability on travel websites: The case of Chinese travelers. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2008, 13, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Picht, H. Modern Approaches to Terminological Theories and Applications; Peter Lang: Bern, Switzerland, 2006; pp. 187–198. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, G.; Santos, C.A. “CHINA, FOREVER”: Tourism discourse and self-orientalism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2009, 36, 295–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dann, G.M. The Language of Tourism: A Sociolinguistic Perspective; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1996; pp. 4–33. [Google Scholar]
- Francesconi, S. Reading Tourism Texts: A Multimodal Analysis; Channel View Publications: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2014; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Hunter, W.C. The social construction of tourism online destination image: A comparative semiotic analysis of the visual representation of Seoul. Tour. Manag. 2016, 54, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mauri, A.G.; Minazzi, R. Web reviews influence on expectations and purchasing intentions of hotel potential customers. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 34, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barthes, R. Rhétorique de l’image. Communications 1964, 4, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maci, S. Virtual touring: The web-language of tourism. Lingu. Filol. 2007, 25, 41–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phipps, A.M. Learning the Arts of Linguistic Survival; Channel View Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 15–28. [Google Scholar]
- Sotiriadis, M.D.; Zyl, C. Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: The use of twitter by tourists. Electron. Commer. Res. 2013, 13, 103–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, N.; Sun, J.; Akhtar, M.; Chen, J. How attitude ambivalence from conflicting online hotel reviews affect consumers’ behavioural responses: The moderating role of dialecticism. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 41, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagnostopoulou, S.; Buhalis, D.; Kountouri, I.; Manousakis, E.; Tsekrekos, A. The impact of online reputation on hotel profitability. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 20–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Halliday, M.A. Functional Grammar; Routledge: London, UK, 2014; pp. 37–63. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, J.R.; White, P.R. The Language of Evaluation; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
- Fuoli, M. Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse Commun. 2012, 6, 55–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seargeant, P.; Tagg, C. The Language of Social Media; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 139–160. [Google Scholar]
- Ngo, T.; Unsworth, L. Reworking the appraisal framework in esl research: Refining attitude resources. Funct. Linguist. 2015, 2, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oates, S.; Pryce, G. Pathos and Patter in Real Estate Parlance. 2007. Available online: http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/30522 (accessed on 15 June 2016).
- Cherrier, H. Anti-consumption discourses and consumer-resistant identities. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, X.; Nesi, H. Differences in engagement: A comparison of the strategies used by British and Chinese research article writers. J. Eng. Acad. Purp. 2019, 38, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharoff, S. Corpus and Systemic Functional Linguistics; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 533–546. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, X.; Nesi, H. Evaluation in research article introductions: A comparison of the strategies used by Chinese and British authors. Text Talk 2019, 39, 797–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norvig, P. English Letter Frequency Counts. 2012. Available online: http://norvig.com/mayzner.html (accessed on 19 January 2018).
- Nirmaldasan. Syllable, Word and Sentence Length. 2010. Available online: https://strainindex.wordpress.com/2010/03/13/syllable-word-and-sentence-length (accessed on 19 January 2018).
- Laufer, B.; Nation, P. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Appl. Lingusit. 1995, 16, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, V. Effects of the Second Language on the First; Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, UK, 2003; pp. 19–31. [Google Scholar]
- To, V.; Fan, S.; Thomas, D. Lexical density and readability: A case study of English textbooks. Internet J. Lang. Cult. Soc. 2013, 37, 61–71. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, J. Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. J. Engl. Acad. Purp. 2016, 23, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednarek, M. Language patterns and ATTITUDE. Funct. Lang. 2009, 16, 165–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soo-Guan Khoo, C.; Nourbakhsh, A.; Na, J.C. Sentiment analysis of online news text: A case study of appraisal theory. Online Inf. Rev. 2012, 36, 858–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Enfield, N.J.; Stivers, T. Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural, and Social Perspectives; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 97–120. [Google Scholar]
- Zahavi, D. Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective; MIT Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 11–30. [Google Scholar]
- Land, V.; Kitzinger, C. Some uses of third-person reference forms in speaker self-reference. Discourse Stud. 2007, 9, 493–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Length | |
Number of segments | 15,212 |
Words in segments | 21,982 |
Tokens in segments | 24,230 |
Text complexity | |
Average word length (chars) | 5.97 |
Average word length (syllables) | 2.53 |
Average segment length (tokens) | 1.45 |
Min. segment length (tokens) | 1 |
Max. segment length (tokens) | 26 |
Lexical density | |
Lexemes per segment | 1.03 |
Lexemes % of text | 71.18% |
Subjectivity | |
Subjective positivity | 0.842 |
Subjective strength | 0.455 |
Reference density | |
First person (1p) reference | 3.480% |
Second person (2p) reference | 5.509% |
Third person (3p) reference | 0.041% |
Token | Frequency | Token | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
elegant | 147 | luxury | 192 |
modern | 84 | luxurious | 110 |
comfortable | 65 | view | 67 |
international | 38 | private | 57 |
elegance | 37 | views | 55 |
warm | 30 | deluxe | 55 |
contemporary | 29 | hotel | 39 |
quiet | 20 | largest | 35 |
classic | 19 | panoramic | 30 |
new | 18 | famous | 26 |
traditional | 18 | ||
beautiful | 18 | ||
designed | 17 | ||
decorated | 16 | ||
style | 16 | ||
romantic | 15 | ||
tranquil | 12 | ||
appointed | 12 | ||
peaceful | 11 | ||
exquisite | 11 | ||
classical | 11 | ||
relaxing | 11 |
Token (Emotive Impact) | Frequency | Token (Pleasantness) | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|
ideal | 96 | comfort | 58 |
perfect | 72 | convenience | 28 |
best | 64 | charm | 21 |
choice | 54 | comfortable | 19 |
landmark | 46 | beautiful | 15 |
home | 45 | great | 14 |
place | 31 | wonderful | 14 |
important | 17 | affordable | 13 |
first | 15 | enchantment | 12 |
away | 13 | comforts | 9 |
sanctuary | 13 | good | 8 |
paradise | 13 | pleasant | 7 |
high-end | 12 | charming | 7 |
unforgettable | 11 | honorable | 6 |
oasis | 11 | conveniences | 6 |
excellent | 11 | convenient | 5 |
perfectly | 10 | efficiency | 5 |
high | 10 | ||
top | 10 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Qian, J.; Law, R. Examination of Website Language Strategies Adopted by Five-Star Hotels in China: A Corpus Approach. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1066-1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040060
Qian J, Law R. Examination of Website Language Strategies Adopted by Five-Star Hotels in China: A Corpus Approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2021; 16(4):1066-1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040060
Chicago/Turabian StyleQian, Jianwei, and Rob Law. 2021. "Examination of Website Language Strategies Adopted by Five-Star Hotels in China: A Corpus Approach" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16, no. 4: 1066-1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040060
APA StyleQian, J., & Law, R. (2021). Examination of Website Language Strategies Adopted by Five-Star Hotels in China: A Corpus Approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(4), 1066-1078. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16040060