Research on Adoption Intention Toward Intelligent Messaging Service: From Self-Determination Theory Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- RQ1: What are the psychological factors that influence intelligent messaging service adoption intention among mobile users?
- RQ2: How do influencing factors affect intelligent messaging service adoption intention among mobile users?
- We explore the antecedents of intelligent messaging adoption intention through mixed methods research (i.e., qualitative and quantitative research). From the perspective of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, self-determination theory (SDT) is used as a framework instead of traditional theoretical models (e.g., TAM and UTAUT), as it focuses on psychological processes and human motivational behavior.
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted among intelligent messaging service users to find out the SDT extrinsic motivation and extended dimension factors. Two extended variables, i.e., openness to experiencing personality traits and perceived complexity of the diffusion of innovation theory, are summarized from qualitative research and then introduced into the structural equation model.
- We have found that the effects of intrinsic motivation are greater than those of extrinsic motivation on adoption intention, which is in line with the expectations of SDT. Our research could learn the psychological motivation and adoption intention regarding intelligent messaging among mobile users in the pre-commercial stage, which is expected to enhance “user-centered” awareness for technical developers and service providers, which can further accelerate the large-scale commercialization of intelligent messaging and construction of the omni-channel media environment.
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Usage of SMS
2.2. AI-Empowered Messaging Services
2.3. Self-Determination Theory
3. Theoretical Model and Hypotheses
3.1. Attitude and Adoption Intention
3.2. Intrinsic Motivation
3.2.1. Perceived Competence
3.2.2. Perceived Autonomy
3.2.3. Perceived Relatedness
3.3. Extrinsic Motivation
3.3.1. Perceived Media Richness
3.3.2. Perceived Interactivity
3.3.3. Perceived System Quality
3.4. Extended Variables
3.4.1. Openness to Experience
3.4.2. Perceived Complexity
4. Research Method
4.1. Data Collection
4.2. Common Method Bias
4.3. Demographic Characteristics
5. Data Analysis
5.1. Measurement Model
5.2. Structural Equation Model
6. Discussion
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Practical Implications
6.3. Limitations
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
AINT | Adoption Intention |
ATT | Attitude |
AVE | Average Variance Extracted |
CR | Composite Reliability |
ICT | Information and Communications Technology |
OPEN | Openness to Experience |
PA | Perceived Autonomy |
PC | Perceived Competence |
PCOM | Perceived Complexity |
PI | Perceived Interactivity |
PMR | Perceived Media Richness |
PRN | Perceived Relatedness |
PSQ | Perceived System Quality |
RCS | Rich Communication Suite |
SDT | Self-Determination Theory |
SMS | Short Message Service |
UTAUT | Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology |
Appendix A. Constructs Items and Interview
Items | Sources | |
---|---|---|
Perceived Competence (PC) | ||
PC1: I feel a sense of accomplishment from using intelligent messaging to handle affairs. | ||
PC2: I feel that I can handle affairs by using intelligent messaging effectively. | [123] | |
PC3: I think I have the ability to use intelligent messaging proficiently after I have been using it for a while. | * | [124] |
PC4: Overall, I’m capable to use intelligent messaging effectively and easily to communicate with others and handle affairs. | [58] | |
Perceived Autonomy (PA) | ||
PA1: I feel free to express my personal thoughts and complete online tasks when I use intelligent messaging. | ||
PA2: I feel like I can pretty much use intelligent messaging as I want to. | ||
PA3: I feel that intelligent messaging gives me a variety of services to choose from. | * | [124] |
PA4: I think the features and services provided by intelligent messaging match my daily usage habits | [123] | |
PA5: I think I can freely choose whether to use intelligent messaging to handle affairs. | * | |
Perceived Relatedness (PRN) | ||
PRN1: I feel that intelligent messaging provides an open channel for me to communicate with government, business and other organizations. | [123] | |
PRN2: I feel more relevant when using intelligent messaging to communicate with organizations such as government, business and other organizations. | ||
PRN3: I feel that I can establish a more friendly communication relationship with other people, government organizations and institutions by using intelligent messaging. | ||
PRN4: When I use intelligent messaging, I feel a lot of closeness and intimacy with the service provider (company, platform). | [125] | |
PRN5: I think it is possible to contact the organization through intelligent messaging to handle important affairs | * | [126] |
Perceived Media Richness (PMR) | ||
PMR1: I feel that the features of intelligent messaging allow me to give and receive timely feedback. | * | [127] [128] [129] |
PMR2: I think intelligent messaging can customize the service to my own personal requirements. | * | |
PMR3: I feel that intelligent messaging provides users with multiple message types (e.g., text, picture, voice, location, etc.) in online communication. | * | |
PMR4: I think intelligent messaging can provide me with a variety of rich media information. | ||
PMR5: I think intelligent messaging can help me to communicate quickly. | ||
Perceived Interactivity (PI) | ||
PI1: I feel using intelligent messaging for interactive communication looks like chatting with human customer service. | [130] | |
PI2: I feel like using intelligent messaging gives me a sense of conversation. | ||
PI3: I perceive that intelligent messaging can capture my information needs keenly. | ||
PI4: I think I can get better responses and feedback by using intelligent messaging. | [85] | |
PI5: I think intelligent messaging will help easy communication with other organizations in the future. | * | [131] |
Perceived System Quality (PSQ) | ||
PSQ1: I think the interface layout of intelligent messaging is clear and user-friendly. | [92] | |
PSQ2: I think intelligent messaging is very functional. | [132] | |
PSQ3: I think intelligent messaging can provide a reliable service. | * | |
PSQ4: I think intelligent messaging has a better operability. | * | [133] |
PSQ5: I think intelligent messaging allows loading all kinds of rich media information more quickly. | ||
Openness to Experience (OPEN) | ||
I see myself as someone who | ||
OPEN1: is original, comes up with new ideas. | [134] | |
OPEN2: is curious about many different things. | * | |
OPEN3: is ingenious, a deep thinker. | ||
OPEN4: has an active imagination. | ||
OPEN5: is inventive. | ||
OPEN6: values artistic, aesthetic experiences | ||
OPEN7: prefers work that is routine (Reverse encoding) | * | |
OPEN8: likes to reflect, play with ideas | * | |
OPEN9: has few artistic interests (Reverse encoding) | ||
OPEN10: is sophisticated in art, music, or literature | ||
Perceived Complexity (PCOM) | ||
PCOM1: If I were to adopt intelligent messaging, it would be complicated to learn. | [135] | |
PCOM2: If I were to adopt intelligent messaging, it would be frustrating to operate. | ||
PCOM3: I think using intelligent messaging requires a certain amount of time to learn. | [136] | |
PCOM4: I believe that intelligent messaging is more troublesome to use than other software. | ||
PCOM5: Overall, I do not think intelligent messaging is easy to operate. | [137] | |
Attitude (ATT) | ||
ATT1: What do you think the function of intelligent messaging is: Bad (1)—Good (7) | [92] [138] | |
ATT2: How do you like using intelligent messaging to handle affairs? Unfavorable (1)—Favorable (7) | ||
ATT3: How much do you support the large-scale commercial use of intelligent messaging? Low (1)—High (7) | ||
ATT4: In general, what is your attitude towards intelligent messaging? Negative (1) —Positive (7) | ||
Adoption Intention (AI) | ||
AI1: If conditions permit, I would like to adopt intelligent messaging for online business and communication in the future. | [139] [87] | |
AI2: The likelihood that I will adopt intelligent messaging in the future is very high. | * | |
AI3: I am interested in adopting intelligent messaging to communicate with others and organizations. | ||
AI4: I would like to be the first to use intelligent messaging. | ||
AI5: I think I can accept intelligent messaging quickly. |
Parent Node | Child Nodes (Number) | Example |
---|---|---|
PMR | High media richness (10) | S12: “5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) can provide richer information. When learning news, the provided information help me understand comprehensively.” |
S16: “Intuitively, it includes integrated media forms (e.g., pictures, audio, video) and enable interaction.” | ||
S17: “5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) has richer content!” | ||
S21: “5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) conveys sufficient and more attractive contents, which is better than traditional (applications) in terms of media richness.” | ||
Fast response and informative (24) | S1: “The answer to question of 5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) is fast and very convenient.” | |
S9: “It (Intelligent Messaging) integrates various applications and functions. When looking for functions and services, it quickly responds my needs and saves searching times.” | ||
S12: “To me, I think it is very fast than 4G. The amount of information is quite large, i.e., it can convey a lot of information in short time, which is the most significant advantage.” | ||
Various types of services (17) | S8: “IM summarizes more services, e.g., car services, like 3D version of 4S store experience.” | |
S12: “5G RCS contents are relatively extensive and wide coverage.” | ||
S14: “Compared with traditional SMS, 5G RCS can handle more information related to government and commercial affairs.” | ||
PI | Intelligent Response (6) | S9: “It looks like I’m talking to an AI Chatbot, who can respond to my needs directly without searching on mobile phone and help find what I want.” |
S10: “Whatever you ask, it will answer your question immediately, which is much more sensitive than some customer service.” | ||
S19: “When typing a question, 5G RCS will automatically capture the core problem, and smart interactions is realized.” | ||
Improved Intelligence (4) | S1: “It has developed to the point that everyone uses it. Do not answer questions that are not what you want to ask. It will give you an answer right away.” | |
S19: “My suggestion is the smarter the better, it can improve human–computer interaction. ” | ||
PSQ | One-stop service (8) | S3: “It has a lot of functions. You can find all services in a place without other software.” |
S9: “5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) provide one-stop service directly. Telling your needs through the dialog box, it will solve everything for you.” | ||
S19: “Via 5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) portal, as long as you send a demand, e.g., recharging the phone bill, it may come out directly, a one-stop service.” | ||
User Friendly (6) | S4: “I think 5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) is more convenient for some elderly people. Because 5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) can deliver contents directly.” | |
S9: “I feel (Intelligent Messaging) may be more friendly to older people like our parents… it takes SMS form…so everyone will be more familiar with it with more user-friendly.” | ||
S19: “Like the old people in my family, they may not use mobile Apps, but they can type. 5G RCS (Intelligent Messaging) will provide more convenient service.” | ||
Reduce software and save memory (16) | S3: “It can save and instead of mobile Apps on phone. I estimate 5–6 Apps can be reduced.” | |
S4: “It can reduce software redundancy. Because with the direct portal, some services must be used on Apps or applets will not be used any more. Those software can be uninstalled.” | ||
S15: “It avoids repeatedly downloading many official accounts and Apps. e.g., health code” | ||
Low learning cost (4) | S11: “The operation of 5G RCS is same as previous SMS. The learning cost is very low.” | |
S13: “The operation mode of 5G RCS is not different with WeChat official account. Learning cost is quite low… In fact, people are already familiar with this interactive way.” | ||
S18: “Usage habits do not need to be cultivated” | ||
OPEN | Out of curiosity (3) | S9: “Yes. It’s novelty. For me, 5G RCS provide novel experience…” |
S15: “I’m more willing to try and prefer to some new applications…” | ||
S21: “5G RCS is new thing. I prefer to have a try with these kind of emerging applications.” | ||
PCOM | Hard to search information (7) | S2: “(In 5G RCS) I need to find applications, which is laborious and troublesome.” |
S17: “You need to enter the original SMS portal and cannot click directly on desktop. one more step operation compared with Apps.” | ||
S20: “If you use 5G RCS every day, some disadvantages exists, e.g., search the history contents from address book or inbox.” | ||
Worry about delays (4) | S5: “If many people usage, application crash will occur. Just like some Apps now.” | |
S14: “I’m more worried about whether there exists any problems or error delays when 5G RCS operated.” | ||
Slow response (2) | S13: “Its response speed is quite slower than mature OTT applications like WeChat.” | |
S21: “I do not think the speed is fast, sometimes it’s quite slow to open pictures.” | ||
AINT | Willing to use (21) | S7: “Yes, because it has a lot of functions in it, it’s very convenient, you do not have to bother to find. It’s very clear, and you can see it when you click in.” |
S11: “I am willing to use it, because I think it is beneficial to experience and indeed service responds seem faster.” | ||
S6: “Yes, because it does not take up memory” | ||
Intended to use first (16) | S12: “I may give priority to use it. Because a platform with all functions can reduce my time and energy of swinging and choice among different platform in a short time” | |
S14: “I will give priority to it. I think the point that attracts me more is that IM can save mobile phone memory.” |
No. | Gender | Age | Occupation |
---|---|---|---|
S1 | Male | 47 | Electrician |
S2 | Female | 18 | Student (Undergraduate) |
S3 | Female | 23 | Student (Graduate) |
S4 | Female | 22 | Student (Undergraduate) |
S5 | Female | 28 | Student (Ph.D.) |
S6 | Female | 19 | Student (College) |
S7 | Female | 20 | Freelance |
S8 | Male | 40 | Civil servant |
S9 | Female | 23 | Student (Undergraduate) |
S10 | Female | 21 | Student (Undergraduate) |
S11 | Male | 24 | Student (Graduate) |
S12 | Female | 21 | Student (Undergraduate) |
S13 | Male | 42 | Software practitioner |
S14 | Female | 24 | Freelance |
S15 | Male | 32 | Sales engineer |
S16 | Male | 42 | ICT company manager |
S17 | Male | 32 | ICT company manager |
S18 | Male | 45 | ICT company manager |
S19 | Male | 33 | Securities company manager |
S20 | Male | 41 | ICT company manager |
S21 | Male | 37 | ICT company staff |
Construct | Indicator | Substantive Factor Loading R1 | Method Factor Loading R2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | ATT1 | 0.7687 *** | 0.5909 | −0.0837 * | 0.007 |
ATT2 | 0.6597 *** | 0.4352 | 0.2466 *** | 0.0608 | |
ATT3 | 0.7323 *** | 0.5362 | −0.0579 | 0.0034 | |
ATT4 | 0.8059 *** | 0.6495 | −0.0847 * | 0.0072 | |
AI | AI1 | 0.7322 *** | 0.5362 | −0.0242 | 0.0006 |
AI3 | 0.7088 *** | 0.5023 | 0.0881 | 0.0078 | |
AI4 | 0.7855 *** | 0.617 | 0.0721 | 0.0052 | |
AI5 | 0.7196 *** | 0.5179 | −0.1444 * | 0.0209 | |
PC | PC1 | 0.7380 *** | 0.5446 | 0.2394 *** | 0.0573 |
PC2 | 0.7455 *** | 0.5558 | −0.0535 | 0.0029 | |
PC4 | 0.7162 *** | 0.5129 | −0.2005 *** | 0.0402 | |
PA | PA1 | 0.7782 *** | 0.6055 | −0.0385 | 0.0015 |
PA2 | 0.7383 *** | 0.5451 | −0.0561 | 0.0032 | |
PA4 | 0.7115 *** | 0.5062 | 0.0965 | 0.0093 | |
PRN | PRN1 | 0.6543 *** | 0.4281 | −0.0091 | 0.0001 |
PRN2 | 0.7583 *** | 0.575 | −0.0208 | 0.0004 | |
PRN3 | 0.6984 *** | 0.4878 | 0.0569 | 0.0032 | |
PRN4 | 0.7440 *** | 0.5535 | −0.0253 | 0.0006 | |
PMR | PMR4 | 0.7918 *** | 0.6269 | 0.0225 | 0.0005 |
PMR5 | 0.7778 *** | 0.605 | −0.0231 | 0.0005 | |
PI | PI1 | 0.8233 *** | 0.6778 | −0.0389 | 0.0015 |
PI2 | 0.7694 *** | 0.5921 | −0.0573 | 0.0033 | |
PI3 | 0.6530 *** | 0.4265 | 0.0615 | 0.0038 | |
PI4 | 0.7050 *** | 0.497 | 0.0479 | 0.0023 | |
PSQ | PSQ1 | 0.6616 *** | 0.4377 | −0.0833 | 0.0069 |
PSQ2 | 0.6969 *** | 0.4857 | −0.0084 | 0.0001 | |
PSQ5 | 0.7748 *** | 0.6003 | 0.0791 | 0.0063 | |
OPEN | OPEN1 | 0.7581 *** | 0.5747 | 0.0001 | 0 |
OPEN10 | 0.7367 *** | 0.5428 | −0.0112 | 0.0001 | |
OPEN3 | 0.7328 *** | 0.537 | 0.0307 | 0.0009 | |
OPEN4 | 0.6908 *** | 0.4773 | −0.0551 | 0.003 | |
OPEN5 | 0.7542 *** | 0.5688 | 0.0286 | 0.0008 | |
OPEN9 | 0.7458 *** | 0.5562 | 0.0143 | 0.0002 | |
OPEN6 | 0.6613 *** | 0.4374 | −0.013 | 0.0002 | |
PCOM | PCOM1 | 0.7255 *** | 0.5264 | 0.2226 *** | 0.0495 |
PCOM2 | 0.7969 *** | 0.635 | 0.0541 | 0.0029 | |
PCOM3 | 0.7475 *** | 0.5587 | 0.0693 | 0.0048 | |
PCOM4 | 0.7176 *** | 0.515 | −0.2423 *** | 0.0587 | |
PCOM5 | 0.6650 *** | 0.4422 | −0.1090 * | 0.0119 | |
Average | 0.7329 | 0.539 | −0.0003 | 0.01 |
References
- Research and Markets. Global Short Message Service Marketing Market. 2022. Available online: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5693342/global-short-message-service-marketing-market (accessed on 4 April 2023).
- CITA. 2022 Annual Survey Highlights. 2022. Available online: https://www.ctia.org/news/2022-annual-survey-highlights (accessed on 4 April 2023).
- National Bureau of Statistics. Mobile SMS Business Volume. 2023. Available online: https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=A01 (accessed on 4 April 2023).
- MIIT. 2022 Communication Industry Statistical Bulletin. 2023. Available online: https://www.miit.gov.cn/gxsj/tjfx/txy/art/2023/art_77b586a554e64763ab2c2888dcf0b9e3.html (accessed on 4 April 2023).
- Infobip. Messaging Trends 2025. 2025. Available online: https://www.infobip.com/messaging-trends-report (accessed on 29 March 2025).
- Hsu, C.L.; Lin, J.C.C. Understanding the user satisfaction and loyalty of customer service chatbots. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 71, 103211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rese, A.; Witthohn, L. Recovering customer satisfaction after a chatbot service failure-The effect of gender. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2025, 84, 104257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, M.; Xu, S. Assessing the impact of AI-chatbot service quality on user e-brand loyalty through chatbot user trust, experience and electronic word of mouth. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 79, 103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lau, O.; Ki, C.W.C. Can consumers’ gamified, personalized, and engaging experiences with VR fashion apps increase in-app purchase intention by fulfilling needs? Fash. Text. 2021, 8, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, Y.W.; Koh, C.E. Social media enablers and inhibitors: Understanding their relationships in a social networking site context. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 49, 170–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bitrián, P.; Buil, I.; Catalán, S. Making finance fun: The gamification of personal financial management apps. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2021, 39, 1310–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le, D.; Holt, C.L. CervixCheck: A Spiritually-Based Text Messaging Intervention to Promote Cervical Cancer Awareness and Pap Test Screening Intention among African-American Women. J. Health Commun. 2018, 23, 842–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tull, F.; Borg, K.; Knott, C.; Beasley, M.; Halliday, J.; Faulkner, N.; Sutton, K.; Bragge, P. Short Message Service Reminders to Parents for Increasing Adolescent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Rates in a Secondary School Vaccine Program: A Randomized Control Trial. J. Adolesc. Health 2019, 65, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibson, D.G.; Ochieng, B.; Kagucia, E.W.; Were, J.; Hayford, K.; Moulton, L.H.; Levine, O.S.; Odhiambo, F.; O’Brien, K.L.; Feikin, D.R. Mobile phone-delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): A cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob. Health 2017, 5, e428–e438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narine, L.K.; Harder, A.; Roberts, T.G. Farmers’ intention to use text messaging for extension services in Trinidad. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2019, 25, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beza, E.; Reidsma, P.; Poortvliet, P.M.; Belay, M.M.; Bijen, B.S.; Kooistra, L. Exploring farmers’ intentions to adopt mobile Short Message Service (SMS) for citizen science in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 151, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shareef, M.A.; Raman, R.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Mahmud, R.; Ahmed, J.U.; Kabir, H.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, U.; Akram, M.S.; Kabir, A.; et al. Public service reformation: Relationship building by mobile technology. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 49, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.; Chen, Z. Influence of SMS advertising on consumer behavioral intention. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2015, 27, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tseng, F.C.; Teng, C.I. Carefulness Matters: Consumer Responses to Short Message Service Advertising. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2016, 20, 525–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakr, Y.; Tolba, A.; Meshreki, H. Drivers of SMS advertising acceptance: A mixed-methods approach. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2019, 13, 96–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Arya, V.; Siddiqui, M.Q. Does SMS advertising still have relevance to increase consumer purchase intention? A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 124, 106919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Han, H.; Li, Y. The study on public-interest short message service (Sms) in china during the COVID-19 pandemic: Mobile user survey and content analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, T.H.T.; Lee, M.; Au, A.K.H.; Tang, H.H.Y.; Tang, E.W.H.; Li, K.K.W. The use of short message service (SMS) to reduce outpatient attendance in ophthalmic clinics during the coronavirus pandemic. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loubet, P.; Czeschan, C.; Sintes, M.; Sotto, A.; Laureillard, D. Use of short message service in at-home COVID-19 patient management. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidlauskiene, J.; Joye, Y.; Auruskeviciene, V. AI-based chatbots in conversational commerce and their effects on product and price perceptions. Electron. Mark. 2023, 33, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, P.F.; Nguyen, K.; Wang, C.Y.; Huang, P.J. Chatbot commerce—How contextual factors affect Chatbot effectiveness. Electron. Mark. 2023, 33, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Yan, Q.; Wang, L. Task-oriented vs. social-oriented: Chatbot communication styles in electronic commerce service recovery. Electron. Commer. Res. 2023, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gnewuch, U.; Morana, S.; Adam, M.; Maedche, A. Opposing Effects of Response Time in Human–Chatbot Interaction: The Moderating Role of Prior Experience. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2022, 64, 773–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-Barreto, J.; Rubio, N.; Molinillo, S. “Find a flight for me, Oscar!” Motivational customer experiences with chatbots. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 3860–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Wu, J.; Song, X.; Fu, W.; Zhai, C. The Quantitative Research on Behavioral Intention towards 5G Rich Communication Services among University Students. Systems 2022, 10, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medeiros, M.; Ozturk, A.; Hancer, M.; Weinland, J.; Okumus, B. Understanding travel tracking mobile application usage: An integration of self determination theory and UTAUT2. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2022, 42, 100949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Brick by Brick: The Origins, Development, and Future of Self-Determination Theory; Elsevier Inc.: Rochester, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Demircioglu, M.A. The Effects of Innovation Climate on Employee Job Satisfaction and Affective Commitment: Findings from Public Organizations. Rev. Public Pers. Adm. 2023, 43, 130–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, D.K.C.; Zhang, L.; Lee, A.S.Y.; Hagger, M.S. Reciprocal relations between autonomous motivation from self-determination theory and social cognition constructs from the theory of planned behavior: A cross-lagged panel design in sport injury prevention. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2020, 48, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasué, M.; Kockel, A.; Dearden, P. The psychological impacts of community-based protected areas. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2022, 32, 1057–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, L.; Kerr, G.; Drennan, J. Privacy concerns on social networking sites: A longitudinal study. J. Mark. Manag. 2017, 33, 1465–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wang, X. Seeking health information on social media: A perspective of trust, self-determination, and social support. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2018, 30, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11, 227–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can. Psychol. 2008, 49, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2000, 36, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demircioglu, M.A. Examining the Effects of Social Media Use on Job Satisfaction in the Australian Public Service: Testing Self-Determination Theory. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2018, 41, 300–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osei, H.V.; Kwateng, K.O.; Boateng, K.A. Integration of personality trait, motivation and UTAUT 2 to understand e-learning adoption in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022, 27, 10705–10730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.A. The Effect of Social Networking Sites’ Activities on Customers’ Well-Being. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2018, 42, 1086–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 61, 101860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daft, R.L.; Lengel, R.H.; Trevino, L.K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Q. 1987, 11, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.C.; Chang, C.M. What motivates health information exchange in social media? The roles of the social cognitive theory and perceived interactivity. Inf. Manag. 2018, 55, 771–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2003, 19, 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Seibert, S.E. The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. J. Appl. Psychol. 2006, 91, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frambach, R.T.; Barkema, H.G.; Nooteboom, B.; Wedel, M. Adoption of a service innovation in the business market: An empirical test of supply-side variables. J. Bus. Res. 1998, 41, 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Madden, T.J. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 22, 453–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavidas, K.; Achriani, A.; Athanassopoulos, S.; Messinis, I.; Kotsiantis, S. University students’ intention to use search engines for research purposes: A structural equation modeling approach. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2020, 25, 2463–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheong, J.; Park, M.C. Mobile internet acceptance in Korea. Internet Res. 2005, 15, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q. Healthcare at your fingertips: The acceptance and adoption of mobile medical treatment services among Chinese users. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Touati, A.; Baek, Y. What Leads to Player’s Enjoyment and Achievement in a Mobile Learning Game? J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2018, 56, 344–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.; Lee, J.; Hwang, Y. Relating motivation to information and communication technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 51, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Ngai, E.; Ju, X. Understanding mobile health service use: An investigation of routine and emergency use intentions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 45, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almathami, H.K.Y.; Win, K.T.; Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. An empirical study on factors influencing consumers’ motivation towards teleconsultation system use. A preliminary report about the Sehha application from Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2022, 163, 104775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chatzisarantis, N.L.D.; Hagger, M.S.; Wang, C.K.J.; Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. The effects of social identity and perceived autonomy support on health behaviour within the theory of planned behaviour. Curr. Psychol. 2009, 28, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raman, A.; Thannimalai, R.; Rathakrishnan, M.; Ismail, S.N. Investigating the influence of intrinsic motivation on behavioral intention and actual use of technology in moodle platforms. Int. J. Instr. 2022, 15, 1003–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, B.; Chaveesuk, S.; Chaiyasoonthorn, W. Moocs adoption in higher education: A management perspective. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2021, 23, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.C.; Backman, S.J.; Backman, K.F.; McGuire, F.A.; Moore, D.W. An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: A self-determination theory. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2019, 24, 591–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, T.H.; Chang, Y.S.; Chang, H.T.; Lin, Y.W. Running on a social exercise platform: Applying self-determination theory to increase motivation to participate in a sporting event. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 114, 106523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grayson, A.; Totzkay, D.S.; Walling, B.M.; Ingalls, J.; Viken, G.; Smith, S.W.; Silk, K.J. Formative research identifying message strategies for a campus bicycle safety campaign using self-determination theory and the social norms approach. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2019, 133, 105295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, I.U.; Hameed, Z.; Yu, Y.; Islam, T.; Sheikh, Z.; Khan, S.U. Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of task-technology fit model, social motivation, and self-determination theory. Telemat. Inform. 2018, 35, 964–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikou, S.A.; Economides, A.A. Mobile-Based Assessment: Integrating acceptance and motivational factors into a combined model of Self-Determination Theory and Technology Acceptance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 68, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Lin, J.; Yang, Y. Students’ motivation and continued intention with online self-regulated learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Z. Fur Erzieh. 2021, 24, 1379–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sussman, S.; Siegal, W. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, W.; Liang, R.Y.; Liu, D. Factors Influencing School Teachers’ Continuous Usage Intention of Using VR Technology for Classroom Teaching. SAGE OPEN 2022, 12, 21582440221114325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morales-Solana, D.; Esteban-Millat, I.; Alegret Cotas, A. Experiences in consumer flow in online supermarkets. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 22, 1195–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheer, V.C. Teenagers’ use of MSN features, discussion topics, and online friendship development: The impact of media richness and communication control. Commun. Q. 2011, 59, 82–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.H.; Liao, H.L.; Pratt, J.A. Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Comput. Educ. 2009, 52, 599–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.K. Exploring the antecedents of screenshot-based interactions in the context of advanced computer software learning. Comput. Educ. 2015, 80, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Wong, I.K.A.; Lin, Z.C. Understanding the role of atmospheric cues of travel apps: A synthesis between media richness and stimulus–organism–response theory. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 49, 226–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, H. Predicting Chinese University Students’ E-Learning Acceptance and Self-Regulation in Online English Courses: Evidence From Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) During COVID-19. SAGE Open 2021, 11, 21582440211061379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, H.F.; Chen, C.H. Design and application of augmented reality query-answering system in mobile phone information navigation. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42, 810–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safdar, S.; Ren, M.; Chudhery, M.A.Z.; Huo, J.; Rehman, H.U.; Rafique, R. Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 176, 121468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, J.Y.; Chang, C.Y. User attitudes toward dedicated e-book readers for reading: The effects of convenience, compatibility and media richness. Online Inf. Rev. 2011, 35, 558–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.H.; Lin, C.N. Influencing factors of mobile instant messaging applications between single- and multi-platform use cases. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2023, 83, 103658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, C.L.; Cheng, Z.C.; Huang, L.J. An investigation into patient privacy disclosure in online medical platforms. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 29085–29095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Lee, K.H. Towards a theoretical framework of motivations and interactivity for using IPTV. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zolkepli, I.A.; Kamarulzaman, Y. Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 43, 189–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yim, M.Y.C.; Yoo, C.Y. Are Digital Menus Really Better than Traditional Menus? The Mediating Role of Consumption Visions and Menu Enjoyment. J. Interact. Mark. 2020, 50, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahn, T.; Hong, M.; Pedersen, P.M. Effects of perceived interactivity and web organization on user attitudes. Eur. Sport Manag. Q. 2014, 14, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willoughby, J.F.; L’Engle, K.L. Influence of perceived interactivity of a sexual health text message service on young people’s attitudes, satisfaction and repeat use. Health Educ. Res. 2015, 30, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, D.H.; Hwang, Y.; Choo, H. Smart TV: Are they really smart in interacting with people? Understanding the interactivity of Korean Smart TV. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2013, 32, 156–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Yao, Z.; Sun, Q. Social media environments effect on perceived interactivity: An empirical investigation from WeChat moments. Online Inf. Rev. 2019, 43, 239–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, H.; Mensah, I.K.; Wang, R.; Gui, L.; Wang, J.; Xiao, Z. The predictors of mobile government services adoption through social media: A case of Chinese citizens. Inf. Dev. 2022, 40, 376–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.; Terrah, A.; Wu, C.; Ali, L.; Wu, H. Antecedents and consequences of user engagement in smartphone travel apps. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2021, 2, 355–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLone, W.H.; McLean, E.R. Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 1992, 3, 60–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, K.Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Hsu, H.Y.S. Why do people switch mobile platforms? The moderating role of habit. Internet Res. 2017, 27, 1170–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.; Lee, S.A.; Jeong, M.; Oh, H. Quality of virtual reality and its impacts on behavioral intention. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 90, 102595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd El Halim, H.; Elbadrawy, R. Examining drivers affecting E-learning system quality during COVID-19. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2022, 33, 1422–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calisir, F.; Altin Gumussoy, C.; Bayraktaroglu, A.E.; Karaali, D. Predicting the intention to use a web-based learning system: Perceived content quality, anxiety, perceived system quality, image, and the technology acceptance model. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. 2014, 24, 515–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzahrani, A.I.; Mahmud, I.; Ramayah, T.; Alfarraj, O.; Alalwan, N. Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model. J. Librariansh. Inf. Sci. 2019, 51, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wut, T.M.; Lee, S.W. Factors affecting students’ online behavioral intention in using discussion forum. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 2022, 19, 300–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Xiang, P.; Zhang, R.; Chen, D.; Ren, Y. Mediating Effect of Risk Propensity between Personality Traits and Unsafe Behavioral Intention of Construction Workers. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2020, 146, 04020023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salgado, J.; Moscoso, S.; Lado, M. Evidence of Cross-Cultural Invariance of the Big Five Personality Dimensions in Work Settings. Eur. J. Personal. 2003, 17, S67–S76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korukonda, A.R. Differences that do matter: A dialectic analysis of individual characteristics and personality dimensions contributing to computer anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2007, 23, 1921–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denden, M.; Tlili, A.; Abed, M.; Bozkurt, A.; Huang, R.; Burgos, D. To Use or Not to Use: Impact of Personality on the Intention of Using Gamified Learning Environments. Electronics 2022, 11, 1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Lee, S.H.; Workman, J.E. How do consumers perceive mobile self-checkout in fashion retail stores? Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2022, 50, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chipeva, P.; Cruz-Jesus, F.; Oliveira, T.; Irani, Z. Digital divide at individual level: Evidence for Eastern and Western European countries. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 460–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irfan, M.; Ahmad, M. Modeling consumers’ information acquisition and 5G technology utilization: Is personality relevant? Personal. Individ. Differ. 2022, 188, 111450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawson-Body, A.; Illia, A.; Willoughby, L.; Lee, S. Innovation characteristics influencing veterans’ adoption of E-government services. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2014, 54, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lean, O.K.; Zailani, S.; Ramayah, T.; Fernando, Y. Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2009, 29, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkumar, M.; Jenamani, M. Organizational buyers’ acceptance of electronic procurement services-an empirical investigation in Indian firms. Serv. Sci. 2015, 7, 272–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Lou, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, H.; Hu, T.; Xie, X. Blame others but hurt yourself: Blaming or sympathetic attitudes toward victims of COVID-19 and how it alters one’s health status. Psychol. Health 2023, 39, 1877–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yi, Y.; Luo, Z.; Wang, W.; Li, J.; Han, B. Getting away from death fear: How disease threat drives consumers’ colorfulness seeking. J. Consum. Behav. 2024, 23, 1087–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, H.; Yin, Z.; Chon, K.; Yuan, Y.; Yu, J. How does artificial intelligence (AI) enhance hospitality employee innovation? The roles of exploration, AI trust, and proactive personality. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2024, 33, 261–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.; Hult, G.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.; MacKenzie, S.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, H.; Saraf, N.; Hu, Q.; Xue, Y. Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management. MIS Q. 2007, 31, 59–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Straub, D.W. A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2012, 36, 3–14. [Google Scholar]
- Hulland, J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strateg. Manag. J. 1999, 20, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wixom, B.H.; Watson, H.J. An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2001, 25, 17–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W.; Marcelin, B.L.; Newsted, P.R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Res. 2003, 14, 189–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urbach, N.; Ahlemann, F. Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. (JITTA) 2010, 11, 5–40. [Google Scholar]
- Sahin, F.; Doğan, E.; İlic, U.; Sahin, Y.L. Factors influencing instructors’ intentions to use information technologies in higher education amid the pandemic. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 4795–4820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vlachopoulos, S.P.; Michailidou, S. Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale. Meas. Phys. Educ. Exerc. Sci. 2006, 10, 179–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standage, M.; Duda, J.L.; Ntoumanis, N. A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2005, 75, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- La Guardia, J.G.; Ryan, R.M.; Couchman, C.E.; Deci, E.L. Within-Person Variation in Security of Attachment: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Attachment, Need Fulfillment, and Well-Being. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van den Broeck, A.; Vansteenkiste, M.; De Witte, H.; Soenens, B.; Lens, W. Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2010, 83, 981–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez, V.; Simo, P.; Sallan, J.M.; Enache, M. Evolution of online discussion forum richness according to channel expansion theory: A longitudinal panel data analysis. Comput. Educ. 2013, 62, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlson, J.R.; Zmud, R.W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Manag. J. 1999, 42, 153–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasty, B.K.; Massey, A.P.; Brown, S.A. Role-based experiences, media perceptions, and knowledge transfer success in virtual dyads. Group Decis. Negot. 2006, 15, 367–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Chen, H.M.; Kazman, R. Investigating antecedents of technology acceptance of initial eCRM users beyond generation X and the role of self-construal. Electron. Commer. Res. 2007, 7, 315–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y. Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites. J. Advert. Res. 2003, 43, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahanmir, S.F.; Silva, G.M.; Gomes, P.J.; Gonçalves, H.M. Determinants of users’ continuance intention toward digital innovations: Are late adopters different? J. Bus. Res. 2020, 115, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wixom, B.H.; Todd, P.A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 2005, 16, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, O.P.; Srivastava, S. The Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, R.L.; Higgins, C.A.; Howell, J.M. Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization. MIS Q. 1991, 15, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makanyeza, C. Determinants of consumers’ intention to adopt mobile banking services in Zimbabwe. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2017, 35, 997–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.Y.; Lin, H.H.; Wang, Y.S.; Shih, Y.W.; Wang, S.T. What drives users’ intentions to purchase a GPS Navigation app: The moderating role of perceived availability of free substitutes. Internet Res. 2018, 28, 251–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muehling, D.D. An investigation of factors underlying attitude-toward-advertising-in-general. J. Advert. 1987, 16, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Construct | Definition | Reference |
---|---|---|
PC | The degree to which an individual reflects and perceives the ability to use intelligent messaging. | [44] |
PA | The degree to which individuals feel free to use intelligent messaging. | [38] |
PRN | The degree of relevance that individuals perceive to other organizations in the process of using intelligent messaging. | [38] |
PMR | The media richness of intelligent messaging perceived by individuals, such as personalization and diversification. | [45] |
PI | The degree of two-way communication, timeliness, and interpersonal simulation of intelligent messaging experienced by individuals. | [46] |
PSQ | The degree to which individuals perceive the quality of system characteristics such as operability, interface aesthetics, and reliability of intelligent messaging. | [47] |
OPEN | The personality dimension that characterizes someone who is intellectually curious and tends to seek new experiences and explore novel ideas. | [48] |
PCOM | The individual’s perception of how difficult it is to use intelligent messaging. | [49] |
ATT | The individual’s judgment on the function of intelligent messaging, etc. | [50] |
AINT | The intensity of an individual’s intention to adopt intelligent messaging. | [51] |
Characteristic | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 256 | 53.28 |
Female | 292 | 46.72 | |
Age | 18–25 years old | 137 | 25.00 |
26–35 years old | 292 | 53.28 | |
36–45 years old | 92 | 16.79 | |
46–60 years old | 27 | 4.93 | |
Over 60 years old | 0 | 0.00 | |
Education | Junior high school and below | 0 | 0.00 |
High School | 19 | 3.47 | |
College | 49 | 8.94 | |
University undergraduate | 400 | 72.99 | |
Master’s degree and above | 80 | 14.60 | |
Job | Student | 106 | 19.34 |
Professionals | 47 | 8.58 | |
Government/institutions officer | 64 | 11.68 | |
Service industry | 19 | 3.47 | |
Freelancers | 10 | 1.82 | |
Workers | 7 | 1.28 | |
Staff | 281 | 51.28 | |
Other | 14 | 2.55 | |
Area | Eastern China | 222 | 40.51 |
Northern China | 68 | 12.41 | |
the Central of China | 82 | 14.96 | |
Southern China | 91 | 16.61 | |
Southwestern China | 48 | 8.76 | |
Northwestern China | 10 | 1.82 | |
Northeastern China | 27 | 4.93 | |
Current type of SMS | Text+hyperlink | 500 | 91.24 |
Card type | 403 | 73.54 | |
5G RCS | 256 | 46.72 | |
Other | 1 | 0.18 |
Characteristic | Num. | Min. | Max. | Mean | Median | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monthly rent (CNY) | 548 | 8 | 600 | 100.08 | 85 | 71.851 |
AINT | ATT | OPEN | PA | PC | PCOM | PI | PMR | PRN | PSQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AINT | 0.737 | |||||||||
ATT | 0.710 | 0.742 | ||||||||
OPEN | 0.368 | 0.372 | 0.726 | |||||||
PA | 0.602 | 0.468 | 0.344 | 0.742 | ||||||
PC | 0.572 | 0.537 | 0.411 | 0.551 | 0.732 | |||||
PCOM | −0.503 | −0.490 | −0.382 | −0.408 | −0.408 | 0.725 | ||||
PI | 0.553 | 0.501 | 0.449 | 0.637 | 0.597 | −0.419 | 0.740 | |||
PMR | 0.539 | 0.539 | 0.325 | 0.507 | 0.530 | −0.394 | 0.502 | 0.785 | ||
PRN | 0.597 | 0.520 | 0.465 | 0.619 | 0.595 | −0.428 | 0.646 | 0.504 | 0.715 | |
PSQ | 0.591 | 0.553 | 0.299 | 0.507 | 0.514 | −0.422 | 0.436 | 0.582 | 0.448 | 0.712 |
Indicator Reliability | Convergent Validity | Consistency Reliability | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Construct | Item | Factor Loading | AVE | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR |
PC | PC1 | 0.760 | 0.536 | 0.570 | 0.776 |
PC2 | 0.750 | ||||
PC4 | 0.684 | ||||
PA | PA1 | 0.775 | 0.550 | 0.594 | 0.786 |
PA2 | 0.705 | ||||
PA4 | 0.745 | ||||
PRN | PRN1 | 0.664 | 0.511 | 0.679 | 0.806 |
PRN2 | 0.753 | ||||
PRN3 | 0.709 | ||||
PRN4 | 0.729 | ||||
PMR | PMR4 | 0.802 | 0.616 | 0.377 | 0.762 |
PMR5 | 0.767 | ||||
PI | PI1 | 0.806 | 0.547 | 0.722 | 0.828 |
PI2 | 0.751 | ||||
PI3 | 0.674 | ||||
PI4 | 0.722 | ||||
PSQ | PSQ1 | 0.649 | 0.507 | 0.513 | 0.755 |
PSQ2 | 0.721 | ||||
PSQ5 | 0.762 | ||||
OPEN | OPEN1 | 0.765 | 0.527 | 0.850 | 0.886 |
OPEN3 | 0.749 | ||||
OPEN4 | 0.688 | ||||
OPEN5 | 0.748 | ||||
OPEN6 | 0.669 | ||||
OPEN9 | 0.743 | ||||
OPEN10 | 0.715 | ||||
PCOM | PCOM1 | 0.675 | 0.526 | 0.782 | 0.847 |
PCOM2 | 0.749 | ||||
PCOM3 | 0.706 | ||||
PCOM4 | 0.783 | ||||
PCOM5 | 0.710 | ||||
ATT | ATT1 | 0.751 | 0.551 | 0.728 | 0.830 |
ATT2 | 0.699 | ||||
ATT3 | 0.721 | ||||
ATT4 | 0.795 | ||||
AINT | AINT1 | 0.737 | 0.543 | 0.719 | 0.826 |
AINT3 | 0.715 | ||||
AINT4 | 0.789 | ||||
AINT5 | 0.703 |
Hypotheses | Path | Path Coefficient (β) | T-Statistics | p-Value | Result | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | ATT -> AINT | 0.388 | 6.321 | 0.217 | 0.000 | Supported |
H2a | PC -> ATT | 0.158 | 2.423 | 0.023 | 0.015 | Supported |
H2b | PC -> AINT | 0.063 | 1.254 | 0.005 | 0.210 | Not supported |
H3a | PA -> ATT | −0.003 | 0.037 | 0.000 | 0.970 | Not supported |
H3b | PA -> AINT | 0.180 | 2.867 | 0.042 | 0.004 | Supported |
H4a | PRN -> ATT | 0.155 | 2.506 | 0.021 | 0.012 | Supported |
H4b | PRN -> AINT | 0.129 | 2.211 | 0.020 | 0.027 | Supported |
H5a | PMR -> ATT | 0.176 | 3.392 | 0.031 | 0.001 | Supported |
H5b | PMR -> AINT | 0.015 | 0.345 | 0.000 | 0.730 | Not supported |
H6a | PI -> ATT | 0.109 | 1.744 | 0.010 | 0.081 | Not supported |
H6b | PI -> AINT | 0.023 | 0.423 | 0.001 | 0.672 | Not supported |
H7a | PSQ -> ATT | 0.253 | 4.763 | 0.067 | 0.000 | Supported |
H7b | PSQ -> AINT | 0.144 | 3.799 | 0.031 | 0.000 | Supported |
H8 | OPEN -> AINT | −0.016 | 0.387 | 0.001 | 0.699 | Not supported |
H9 | PCOM -> AINT | −0.089 | 2.183 | 0.015 | 0.029 | Supported |
Indirect Path | Path Coefficient (β) | Bca [2.5%, 97.5%] | T-Statistics | p-Value | ||
PRN -> ATT -> AINT | 0.060 | [0.012, 0.121] | 2.150 | 0.032 | ||
PSQ -> ATT -> AINT | 0.098 | [0.048, 0.148] | 3.854 | 0.000 | ||
PC -> ATT -> AINT | 0.061 | [0.012, 0.116] | 2.317 | 0.021 | ||
PMR -> ATT -> AINT | 0.068 | [0.023, 0.113] | 3.007 | 0.003 |
Variables | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Q2 |
---|---|---|---|
AINT | 0.641 | 0.635 | 0.335 |
ATT | 0.454 | 0.448 | 0.238 |
Index | NFI | RMS_Theta | d_G | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Value | 0.655 | 0.117 | 0.93 | 0.069 |
Threshold | 0.9 < NFI < 1 | <0.95 | <0.95 | <0.08 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wu, J.; Yu, Z. Research on Adoption Intention Toward Intelligent Messaging Service: From Self-Determination Theory Perspective. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20, 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020083
Wu J, Yu Z. Research on Adoption Intention Toward Intelligent Messaging Service: From Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2025; 20(2):83. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020083
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Jianming, and Zhiyuan Yu. 2025. "Research on Adoption Intention Toward Intelligent Messaging Service: From Self-Determination Theory Perspective" Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 20, no. 2: 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020083
APA StyleWu, J., & Yu, Z. (2025). Research on Adoption Intention Toward Intelligent Messaging Service: From Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020083