Next Article in Journal
Non-Local Vectorial Internal Variables and Generalized Guyer-Krumhansl Evolution Equations for the Heat Flux
Previous Article in Journal
Memory Effects, Multiple Time Scales and Local Stability in Langevin Models of the S&P500 Market Correlation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Entropy-Based Approach to Measuring Diet Adherence

Entropy 2023, 25(9), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25091258
by Curtis Huffman 1,*, Ana G. Ortega-Avila 2 and Héctor Nájera 1
Reviewer 1:
Entropy 2023, 25(9), 1258; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25091258
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 25 January 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Signal and Data Analysis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors propose an approach  to calculate and sum up the disperancies between the actual food acquisition or intake and any standard or norm. Subsequently, they apply their approach to data collected from the Mexican National Survey of Household Income and Expenditure.

There are major issues with the manuscript such as a related works section missing. Moreover there is neither a formal or computational evaluation of proposed metric. The metric is proposed and subsequently applied without being evaluated for its soundness.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

First of all, I would like to thank you for reviewing this research. 

Before proceeding to the publication of the research, I think it is necessary to mention a couple of things. 

The introduction should better contextualise the type of diet followed in Mexico, as nothing is shown. In addition, together with the research objectives, the initial starting hypotheses should be established. 

Regarding the methodology, it should be readapted in the following parts: Methodology of the study, Ethical principles, Procedure and Data analysis. Also, specify and justify why these sites were chosen rather than others. 

Add the limitations and future perspectives of this study.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The article has been considerably improved, so I am giving the go-ahead for publication. 

Back to TopTop