Next Article in Journal
Interplay between Beryllium Bonds and Anion-π Interactions in BeR2:C6X6:Y Complexes (R = H, F and Cl, X = H and F, and Y = Cl and Br)
Next Article in Special Issue
The Emergence of Quinone Methides in Asymmetric Organocatalysis
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Amoebicidal Activity of Hydrazone Derivatives: Synthesis, Characterization, Electrochemical Behavior, Theoretical Study and Evaluation of the Biological Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Highly Diastereoselective Synthesis of Spiropyrazolones
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microwave-Assisted Resolution of α-Lipoic Acid Catalyzed by an Ionic Liquid Co-Lyophilized Lipase

1
Central Laboratory, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
2
Key Laboratory of Molecular Enzymology and Engineering of Ministry of Education, College of Life Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
3
The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2015, 20(6), 9949-9960; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20069949
Submission received: 17 April 2015 / Revised: 18 May 2015 / Accepted: 19 May 2015 / Published: 29 May 2015
(This article belongs to the Collection Recent Advances in Organocatalysis)

Abstract

:
The combination of the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase and microwave irradiation was used to improve enzyme performance in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Effects of various reaction conditions on enzyme activity and enantioselectivity were investigated. Under optimal condition, the highest enantioselectivity (E = 41.2) was observed with a high enzyme activity (178.1 μmol/h/mg) when using the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase with microwave assistance. Furthermore, the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase exhibited excellent reusability under low power microwave.

1. Introduction

As an important cofactor involved in many enzyme-catalyzed reactions [1], α-lipoic acid has already been used to treat many diseases [2,3,4]. Since (R)-α-lipoic acid exhibits higher biological activity than its (S)-enantiomer [5], great attention has been focused on the stereoselective synthesis of its (R)-enantiomer. There are two main routes to synthesize (R)-α-lipoic acid, including the chemical synthesis and biocatalytic process. The chemical synthesis is usually conducted using asymmetric synthesis [6,7] or synthesis from a chiral starting material [8]. Due to the interest in a product with high enantiomeric purity, several alternative biocatalytic processes have been developed recently, including reductase catalysis [9,10,11,12], Bakers’ yeast reduction [13], and lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution [14,15,16,17]. Among these processes, lipase-catalyzed kinetic resolution is one of the most attractive methods. Zhou and his group had successfully prepared the chiral chlorohydrin precursor of (R)-α-lipoic acid via lipase catalyzed enantioselective transesterification [17]. In 1997, Fadnavis firstly reported that the commercially available Candida rugosa lipase can catalyze the enzymatic resolution of α-lipoic acid directly [14]. Yan and his co-workers have reported that the lipase from Aspergillus oryzae WZ007 is another potential candidate for enzymatic resolution of α-lipoic acid [15,16]. However, all these lipases exhibited poor enzyme performance (low enzyme activity or unsatisfied enantioselectivity), which may increase the reaction time and reduce the yield of the enantiomerically pure product. Thus, novel enzymes and new techniques are warranted to improve the performance of enantioselective esterification.
Microwave irradiation (MW) and ionic liquid (IL) are two important and rapid developing technologies in green chemistry [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The combination of MW and IL has already attracted a great deal of attention for enzymatic reactions in recent years [26,27,28]. In reports, IL was used as reaction media due to its excellent microwave-absorbing ability. However, the high viscosity of IL may have an adverse effect on the mass transfer of the substrates and worsen enzyme performance [29]. It is well known that a small amount of IL can induce dramatic changes in the overall dielectric properties of the reaction medium under microwave irradiation [30,31]. Furthermore, lyophilization of enzyme in the presence of a small amount of IL can improve the activity, stability, and enantioselectivity of enzymes [32,33,34,35,36,37]. All of the above reports may provide a new breakthrough to improve the activity and enantioselectivity of enzyme during biocatalytic synthesis.
In the present work, the combination of the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase and microwave irradiation was used to improve the enzyme performance in the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. The enzyme has been firstly co-lyophilized with a small amount of ionic liquid and then used as catalyst to carry out the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid under microwave irradiation (Scheme 1). The effects of reaction conditions on the activity and enantioselectivity were investigated and the reusability of the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase under microwave was also studied.
Scheme 1. Enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid catalyzed by ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase under microwave.
Scheme 1. Enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid catalyzed by ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase under microwave.
Molecules 20 09949 g004

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effect of Lipase Source

Four commercially available lipases were selected for enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid and the results were listed in Table 1. All selected lipases could catalyze the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Moreover, all the enzymes favor the (S)-enantiomer of α-lipoic acid, but exhibited poor enantioselectivity. Among the tested lipases, CLL (Candida lipolytic lipase) showed the highest enantioselectivity (E = 3.2) and a higher enzyme activity (3.7 μmol/h/mg). Thus, CLL was selected as the catalyst for further study.
Table 1. Effect of lipase source on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
Table 1. Effect of lipase source on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
LipaseReaction Time (h)Conversion (%)ees (%)Enzyme Activity (μmol/h/mg)Enantioselectivity ( E value)Stereoselectivity
Candida cylindracea A.Y. lipase (AYL)1219.88.43.32.2S
Mucor miehei lipase (MML)2024.06.32.41.6S
Porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL)3016.55.81.11.9S
Candida lipolytic lipase (CLL)1222.213.63.73.2S
Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), lipase (10 mg), n-octanol (5 mmol) and heptane (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C and 150 rpm.

2.2. Effect of Organic Media

Organic media can alter the solubility of substrates and affect enzyme performance [38]. In this study, organic solvents with different log P were selected to investigate the effect of the reaction medium; log P is the most frequently used parameter to denote the polarity or hydrophobicity of a solvent [39]. The results shown in Table 2 indicate that the best catalytic performance of CLL was observed when cyclohexane was used as the reaction media. When polar solvents were used as the reaction media, they could disrupt the functional structure of the enzyme by stripping off the essential water from the protein and decrease the enzyme activity and the enantioselectivity [40,41].
Other reaction conditions were also investigated (data not shown). Our experimental results indicated that n-octanol was the most suitable acyl-acceptor. The optimal substrate molar ratio (α-lipoic acid/n-octanol) was 1:2.5 and the enzyme dosage in this reaction system was 10 mg.
Table 2. Effect of organic solvents on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
Table 2. Effect of organic solvents on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
SolventLog PReaction Time (h)Conversion (%)ees (%)Enzyme Activity (μmol/h/mg)Enantioselectivity (E value)
Isooctane4.51225.23.04.21.2
Heptane4.01222.213.63.73.2
Cyclohexane3.21221.617.53.65.3
Toluene2.51515.88.52.12.9
Acetonitrile−0.332819.69.31.42.4
1,4-Dioxane−1.16026.84.20.91.3
Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg), n-octanol (5 mmol) and organic solvent (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C and 150 rpm.

2.3. Effect of ILs Used for the Ionic Liquid Co-Lyophilized Enzyme

Lyophilization of enzyme in the presence of a suitable ionic liquid is a simple method to modify the enzyme and can improve enzyme performance in non-aqueous media [32,33,34,35,36,37]. The ionic liquid co-lyophilized enzyme, prepared by different hydrophilic ionic liquids (15%, wt %, IL/enzyme), was used to catalyze the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. As shown in Table 3, CLL showed poor enzyme performance when CLL was co-lyophilized with [Bmim] Cl or [Bmim] Ac. This may be due to the high hydrogen-bond basicity of these two ionic liquids destroying the enzyme conformation and decreasing the activity and the enantioselectivity. Among the different ionic liquids, [Bmim] BF4 was selected as the most suitable ionic liquid for further study since the best catalytic performance was observed when CLL was co-lyophilized with [Bmim] BF4. The activation effect of co-lyophilization might be due to the active-site preservation or molecular flexibility increase in organic environments or a combination of both [36,38].
Table 3. Effect of ionic liquids on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
Table 3. Effect of ionic liquids on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
Ionic LiquidReaction Time (h)Conversion (%)ees (%)Enzyme Activity (μmol/h/mg)Enantioselectivity (E value)
[Bmim] Cl4816.87.40.72.3
[Bmim] Ac3021.011.71.42.9
[Bmim] BF4526.527.010.69.1
None1221.617.53.65.3
Reaction conditions: Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with different ionic liquid (15%, wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C and 150 rpm.
When the ionic liquid co-lyophilized enzyme catalyzed the enantioselective esterification, the ionic liquid content may be an important influencing factor. In this study, the correlation between the content of [Bmim] BF4 (0%–40%, wt %, IL/enzyme) and enzyme performance was investigated. Figure 1 showed that both the enzyme activity and the enantioselectivity exhibited bell-shaped curves when changing the content of [Bmim] BF4, which meant a suitable content of [Bmim] BF4 was necessary for enzyme lyophilized preparation. The best enzyme performance was obtained at a content of [Bmim] BF4 (20%, wt %, IL/enzyme) with an enzyme activity of 9.8 μmol/h/mg and an enantioselectivity (E value) of 12.5.

2.4. Microwave Irradiation vs. Conventional Heating

Compared with the results obtained from conventional heating, microwave irradiation can enhance both the enzyme activity and enantioselectivity of the free CLL or the ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL (Table 4). Moreover, the improvement of enzyme performance for the ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL under MW was much greater than that of the free enzyme. The dramatic enhancement of enzyme performance might be that microwaves can directly act on the ionic liquid co-lyophilized enzyme because of the excellent microwave-absorbing ability of IL [42] and change the protein conformation of CLL.
Figure 1. Effects of [Bmim] BF4 content during lyophilized preparation on the enzyme activity (μmol/h/mg, ○) and the enantioselectivity (E value, ●) in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with different contents of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C and 150 rpm.
Figure 1. Effects of [Bmim] BF4 content during lyophilized preparation on the enzyme activity (μmol/h/mg, ○) and the enantioselectivity (E value, ●) in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with different contents of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C and 150 rpm.
Molecules 20 09949 g001
Table 4. Effect of microwaves on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
Table 4. Effect of microwaves on the enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid.
Conventional HeatingMicrowave
Enzyme Activity (μmol/h/mg)Enantioselectivity (E value)Enzyme Activity (μmol/h/mg)Enantioselectivity (E value)
Free CLL3.65.35.16.7
Ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL9.812.5170.438.6
Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), free CLL (10 mg) or CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with 20% of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C. The microwave was carried out in a microwave bath (480 W). Conventional shaking was performed at 150 rpm.

2.5. Effect of Microwave Power

The effect of microwave power on the enzyme performance of the ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL was examined in the range of 0–640 W. As shown in Figure 2, ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL exhibited the highest enantioselectivity (E value, 38.6) and a higher enzyme activity (170.4 μmol/h/mg) when the microwave power was 480 W. Generally, the higher the microwave power was set, the faster the dipole reorientated under the MW, which might make the functional groups obtain a higher reactivity [28,43]. Since all of the ionic liquid co-lyophilized enzyme and substrate used in this study had significant dipole moments, microwave could significantly impact theses molecules and activate enzyme and substrate. At high microwave power, the enzyme activity and the enantioselectivity decreased, possibly due to the denaturation of enzymes, caused by the quick change of temperature at the very beginning of the reaction. Based on the experimental results, 480 W was chosen as the optimal microwave power.
Figure 2. Effect of microwave power on the enzyme activity (μmol/mg/h, ○) and enantioselectivity (E value, ●) of ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with 20% of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C under microwave with various power (W).
Figure 2. Effect of microwave power on the enzyme activity (μmol/mg/h, ○) and enantioselectivity (E value, ●) of ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with 20% of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at 30 °C under microwave with various power (W).
Molecules 20 09949 g002

2.6. Effect of Microwave Temperature

The effect of temperature was examined in the range of 15–50 °C under microwave irradiation. The results in Figure 3 demonstrated that the highest enzyme activity (178.1 μmol/h/mg) was obtained, with a high enantioselectivity (E = 41.2), at 25 °C for the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase. Therefore, 25 °C was selected as the optimal microwave temperature. Under optimal conditions, a preparative reaction on a twenty-fold-larger scale gave (R)-α-lipoic acid with about 41% yield and 99% ee.
Figure 3. Effect of microwave temperature on the enzyme activity (μmol/mg/h, ○) and enantioselectivity (E value, ●) of ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with 20% of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at different temperature under microwaves (480 W).
Figure 3. Effect of microwave temperature on the enzyme activity (μmol/mg/h, ○) and enantioselectivity (E value, ●) of ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with 20% of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at different temperature under microwaves (480 W).
Molecules 20 09949 g003

2.7. Reusability of the Ionic Liquid Co-Lyophilized Enzyme under Microwave Irradiation

The ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase exhibited excellent reusability under low power microwaves. As shown in Table 5, the ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL could still keep 95.2% of its original activity and 94.4% of its original enantioselectivity, even after six reaction cycles.
Table 5. Reusability of ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL under microwaves.
Table 5. Reusability of ionic liquid co-lyophilized CLL under microwaves.
Reaction CycleRelative Activity (%)E value
110041.2
299.240.9
398.540.6
497.740.3
596.439.5
695.238.9
Reaction conditions: (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol), CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with 20% of [Bmim] BF4 (wt %, IL/enzyme), n-octanol (5 mmol) and cyclohexane (10 mL) were performed at 25 °C under microwaves (480 W).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

D-phenylalanine, α-lipoic acid and o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 11-Mercaptoundecanoic acid was also purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and used as the internal standard. All the ionic liquids (1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, [Bmim] Cl; 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate [Bmim] Ac; 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, [Bmim] BF4) were purchased from Shanghai Chengjie Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Candida cylindracea A.Y. lipase (AYL) was purchased from Amano Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Nagoya, Japan). Mucor miehei lipase (MML) was purchased from Novo (Bagsvaerd, Denmark). Porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL) was purchased from Shanghai Dongfeng Biochemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Candida lipolytic lipase (CLL) was provided by Wuxi enzyme preparation plant (Wuxi, China). All the other chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and were of analytical reagent grade.
The OPA-solution (25 mM) was prepared by dissolving OPA (33.5 mg) in 0.5 mL of methanol and diluted by 10 mL of a potassium borate buffer (0.4 M, pH 9.9). The internal standard solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid in 10 mL methanol.

3.2. Microwave Equipment

Reactions were carried out in a commercial multimode microwave reactor (MCR-3, Shanghai JieSi Microwave Chemistry Corporation). The machine consisted of a continuous focused microwave power delivery system and an operator selectable power output from 0 to 800 W. The temperature of the reaction mixture was monitored and kept constant (±1 °C) by using a contact Teflon platinum resistance temperature transducer inserted directly into the reaction mixture. The content of the vessel was stirred by a rotating magnetic plate located below the base of the microwave cavity and a Teflon-coated magnetic stir bar in the vessel.

3.3. Preparation of the Co-Lyophilized Lipase

Lipase powder (1 g) was dispersed in phosphate buffer (50 mL, pH 8.0, 0.1 M) at 4 °C for 2 h under stirring, and the insoluble impurity was removed by centrifugation (8000 rpm, 5 min). The supernatant was lyophilized for 48 h. The lyophilized enzyme powder (200 mg) was dissolved again in the above phosphate buffer (10 mL). To prepare the co-lyophilized lipase, [Bmim] BF4 (40 mg) was added to the enzyme solution and the solution was lyophilized for 12 h.

3.4. Resolution of α-Lipoic Acid

The reaction mixture containing cyclohexane (10 mL), (R,S)-α-lipoic acid (2 mmol) and n-octanol (5 mmol) was incubated in a microwave oven (480 W, 25 °C, 150 rpm). The reaction was initiated by addition of CLL (10 mg) co-lyophilized with [Bmim] BF4 (20%, wt %, IL/enzyme). The reaction mixture (100 μL) was withdrawn periodically and extracted by the solution of sodium bicarbonate (25 mM, 200 μL) to obtain the un-reacted α-lipoic acid aqueous solution for High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) detection.

3.5. Reusability of the Co-Lyophilized Lipase

After each round of reaction, the co-lyophilized lipase was recycled by centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 5 min, 4 °C) and washed with cyclohexane for three times. Then, the enzyme was repeatedly used in the next reaction. The residue activity of the recycled enzyme was compared with the enzyme activity of the first cycle (100%).

3.6. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis

α-Lipoic acid was determined using OPA derivatization and fluorescence detection, based on the previous report [44], with a minor modification.
The extracted un-reacted α-lipoic acid solution (50 μL) was mixed with 50 μL of the internal standard solution and 25 μL of a 0.05 M aqueous solution of NaOH containing 0.5 mg/mL of NaBH4 and incubated at 60 °C for 10 min to obtain the reduced α-lipoic acid before OPA derivatization. The OPA derivatizations were carried out by mixing the reduced sample solution (25 μL), the d-phenylalanine solution (25 μL, 25 mM) with the OPA-solution (50 μL, 25 mM) for 60 min, standing at room temperature. The reaction was terminated by acidification with 100 µL of phosphate buffer (0.02 M, pH 5.8) before injection.
The sample analysis was performed on an Agilent 1200 HPLC equipped with a 250 × 4 mm LiChrospher 100 RP-18 (5 μm) reversed-phase column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The mobile phase was composed of 55% (v/v) phosphate buffer (0.02 M, pH 5.8) and 45% (v/v) acetonitrile/methanol (v/v, 1:1). A flow rate of 1.8 mL/min was used. Detection was carried out by excitation at 230 nm and emission over 418 nm. The injection of samples (20 μL) was performed using an auto-sampler (Jasco 851-AS).
The enantiomeric excess of the un-reacted α-lipoic acid (ee) was determined by calculating the peak areas of the two enantiomers, and the conversion (C) was determined based on the decrease of the substrate. The enzyme activity (μmol/h/mg) was defined as the amount (in micromoles) of the decreased substrate per hour per milligram of enzyme and was detected while the conversion was controlled in the range of the 15%~30%. The enantiomeric ratio (E value) was calculated according to Chen et al. [45]. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and all data were obtained based on the average values.
E =   ln   [ ( 1 - C ) ( 1 - e e )   ] ln   [ ( 1 - C ) ( 1 + e e )   ]

4. Conclusions

In this study, we take the advantage of the synergistic effect between ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase and microwave irradiation to enhance the enzyme performance in enantioselective esterification of α-lipoic acid. Under the optimal reaction conditions, the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase exhibited a satisfied enzyme performance (E value, 41.2; enzyme activity, 178.1 μmol/h/mg). Furthermore, high reusability of the ionic liquid co-lyophilized lipase under low power MW conditions make it more attractive for resolution of (R,S)-α-lipoic acid in industry.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21172093, 21175055, 31070708, 81472030, and 21072075), the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Jilin University (2013), the Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Educational Committee (general project No. L2012431), Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (Nos. 20140101141JC, 201115038 and 20150204001YY), and Norman Bethune Program of Jilin University (2012210).

Author Contributions

Xiaona Xie conceived and designed the experiments; Ning Liu, Lei Wang, and Zhi Wang performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Ning Liu, Lei Wang, Zhi Wang, Liyan Jiang, Zhuofu Wu, Hong Yue, and Xiaona Xie wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reed, L.J.; Debusk, B.G.; Gunsalus, I.C.; Hornberger, C.S., Jr. Crystalline α-lipoic acid: A catalytic agent associated with pyruvate dehydrogenase. Science 1951, 114, 93–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Packer, L.; Witt, E.H.; Tritschler, H.J. Alpha-lipoic acid as a biological antioxidant. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1995, 19, 227–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cho, Y.S.; Lee, J.; Lee, T.H.; Lee, E.Y.; Lee, K.U.; Park, J.Y.; Moon, H.B.J. α-Lipoic acid inhibits airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 114, 429–435. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baur, A.; Harrer, T.; Peukert, M.; Jahn, G.; Kalden, J.R.; Fleckenstein, B. Alpha-lipoic acid is an effective inhibitor of human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV-1) replication. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 1991, 69, 722–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brookes, M.H.; Golding, B.T.; Howes, D.A.; Hudson, A.T. Proof that the absolute configuration of natural α-lipoic acid is R by the synthesis of its enantiomer [(S)-(–)-α-lipoic acid] from (S)-malic acid. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1983, 19, 1051–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Upadhya, T.T.; Nikalje, M.D.; Sudalai, A. Asymmetric dihydroxylation and hydrogenation approaches to the enantioselective synthesis of R-(+)-α-lipoic acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 4891–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Duan, W. An enantioselective formal synthesis of (+)-(R)-α-lipoic acid by an l-proline-catalyzed aldol reaction. Synthesis 2008, 3, 383–386. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chavan, S.P.; Praveen, C.; Ramakrishna, G.; Kalkote, U.R. Enantioselective synthesis of R-(+)-α and S-(−)-α-lipoic acid. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6027–6028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, W.X.; Zheng, G.W.; Xu, J.H. Identification of an ε-Keto ester reductase for the efficient synthesis of an (R)-α-lipoic acid precursor. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Olbrich, M.; Gewald, R. Process for the Enantioselective Reduction of 8-Chloro-6-oxo-octanoic Acid Alkyl Esters. U.S. Patent 7,135,328 [P], 14 November 2006. [Google Scholar]
  11. Müller, M.; Sauer, W.; Laban, G. From 8-Chloro-6-oxooctanoic Acid Alkyl Esters, Using Alcohol Dehydrogenases or Carbonyl Reductases in the Presence of NADH or NADPH as Cofactor; Intermediates to Alpha-Lipoic Acid. U.S. Patent 7,157,253[P], 2 January 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. Adger, B.; Bes, M.T.; Grogan, G.; McCague, R.; Pedragosa-Moreau, S.; Roberts, S.M.; Villa, R.; Wan, P.W.H.; Willetts, A.J. The synthesis of (R)-(+)-lipoic acid using a monooxygenase-catalysed biotransformation as the key step. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 1997, 5, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gopalan, A.S.; Jacobs, H.K. Bakers’ yeast reduction of alkyl 6-chloro-3-oxohexanoates: Synthesis of (R)-(+)-α-lipoic acid. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin. Trans. 1990, 1, 1897–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fadnavis, N.W.; Koteshwar, K. Remote control of stereoselectivity: Lipase catalyzed enantioselective esterification of racemic α-lipoic acid. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1997, 8, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yan, H.D.; Zhang, Y.J.; Shen, L.J.; Wang, Z. Lipase-catalysed sequential kinetic resolution of α-lipoic acid. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol. 2012, 6, 152–158. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yan, H.D.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L.J. Kinetic resolution of α-lipoic acid via enzymatic differentiation of a remote stereocenter. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 36, 643–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhou, W.J.; Ni, Y.; Zheng, G.W.; Chen, H.H.; Zhu, Z.R.; Xu, J.H. Enzymatic resolution of a chiral chlorohydrin precursor for (R)-α-lipoic acid synthesis via lipase catalyzed enantioselective transacylation with vinyl acetate. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2014, 99, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Motasemi, F.; Ani, F.N. A review on microwave-assisted production of biodiesel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 4719–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oghbaei, M.; Mirzaee, O. Microwave versus conventional sintering: A review of fundamentals, advantages and applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 494, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lidström, P.; Tierney, J.; Wathey, B.; Westman, J. Microwave assisted organic chemistry—A review. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9225–9283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Strauss, C.R.; Rooney, D.W. Accounting for clean, fast and high yielding reactions under microwave conditions. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1340–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, S.; Deng, Y. Recent advances in ionic liquid catalysis. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2619–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tian, R.; Yang, C.H.; Wei, X.F.; Xun, E.N.; Wang, R.; Cao, S.G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L. Optimization of APE1547-catalyzed enantioselective transesterification of (R/S)-2-methyl-1-butanol in an ionic liquid. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2011, 16, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sheldon, R.A. Green solvents for sustainable organic synthesis: State of the art. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Z.; Pan, W. Ionic liquids: Green solvents for nonaqueous biocatalysis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2005, 37, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Martínez-Palou, R. Ionic liquid and microwave-assisted organic synthesis: A “green” and synergic couple. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2007, 51, 252–264. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yu, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Ma, D.; Fang, X. Combination use of microwave irradiation and ionic liquid in enzymatic isomerization of xylose to xylulose. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2012, 79, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, D.; Ma, D.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Fang, X. Microwave-assisted enzymatic resolution of (R,S)-2-octanol in ionic liquid. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, S.; Kazlauskas, R.J. Biocatalysis in ionic liquids-advantages beyond green technology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kappe, C.O. Microwave dielectric heating in synthetic organic chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1127–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mallakpour, S.; Rafiee, Z. New developments in polymer science and technology using combination of ionic liquids and microwave irradiation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36, 1754–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Itoh, T.; Matsushita, Y.; Abe, Y.; Han, S.H.; Wada, S.; Hayase, S.; Kawatsura, M.; Takai, S.; Morimoto, M.; Hirose, Y. Increased enantioselectivity and remarkable acceleration of lipase-catalyzed transesterification by using an imidazolium PEG-alkyl sulfate ionic liquid. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 9228–9237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Abe, Y.; Hirakawa, T.; Nakajima, S.; Okano, N.; Hayase, S.; Kawatsura, M.; Hirose, Y.; Itoh, T. Remarkable activation of an enzyme by (R)-oyrrolidine-substituted imidazolium alkyl PEG sulfate. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1954–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abe, Y.; Yoshiyama, K.; Yagi, Y.; Hayase, S.; Kawatsura, M.; Itoh, T. A rational design of phosphonium salt type ionic liquids for ionic liquid coated-lipase catalyzed reaction. Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1976–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abe, Y.; Yagi, Y.; Hayase, S.; Kawatsura, M.; Itoh, T. Ionic liquid engineering for lipase-mediated optical resolution of secondary alcohols: Design of ionic liquids applicable to ionic liquid coated-lipase catalyzed reaction. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 9952–9958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, J.K.; Kim, M.J. Ionic liquid co-lyophilized enzyme for biocatalysis in organic solvent: Remarkably enhanced activity and enantioselectivity. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2011, 68, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yoshiyama, K.; Abe, Y.; Hayse, S.; Nokami, T.; Itoh, T. Synergetic activation of lipase by an amino acid with alkyl-PEG-sulfate ionic liquid. Chem. Lett. 2013, 42, 663–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hudson, E.P.; Eppler, R.K.; Clark, D.S. Biocatalysis in semi-aqueous and nearly anhydrous conditions. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Carrea, G.; Otto, L.G.; Riva, S. Role of solvents in the control of enzyme selectivity in organic media. Trends Biotechnol. 1995, 13, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gorman, L.A.S.; Dordick, J.S. Organic solvents strip water off enzymes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1992, 39, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, L.; Tai, J.D.; Wang, R.; Xun, E.N.; Wei, X.F.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z. Enantioselective transesterification of glycidol catalysed by a novel lipase expressed from Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2010, 56, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, C.; Sun, L.D.; Li, Z.X.; Li, L.L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.W.; Yan, C.H. Ionic liquid-based route to spherical NaYF4 nanoclusters with the assistance of microwave radiation and their multicolor upconversion luminescence. Langmuir 2010, 26, 8797–8803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, Z.C.; Niu, X.D.; Fang, X.D.; Chen, G.; Zhang, H.; Yue, H.; Wang, L.; Zhao, D.T.; Wang, Z. Enantioselective esterification of ibuprofen under microwave irradiation. Molecules 2013, 18, 5472–5481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Niebch, G.; Büchele, B.; Blome, J.; Grieb, S.; Brandt, G.; Kampa, P.; Raffel, H.H.; Locher, M.; Borbe, H.O.; Nubert, I.; et al. Enantioselective high-performance liquid chromatography assay of (+)R- and (−)S-α-lipoic acid in human plasma. Chirality 1997, 9, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, C.S.; Fujimoto, Y.; Girdaukas, G.; Sih, C.J. Quantitative analyses of biochemical kinetic resolutions of enantiomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7294–7299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds ((R,S)-α-lipoic acid and (R)-α-lipoic acid) are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, N.; Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wu, Z.; Yue, H.; Xie, X. Microwave-Assisted Resolution of α-Lipoic Acid Catalyzed by an Ionic Liquid Co-Lyophilized Lipase. Molecules 2015, 20, 9949-9960. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20069949

AMA Style

Liu N, Wang L, Wang Z, Jiang L, Wu Z, Yue H, Xie X. Microwave-Assisted Resolution of α-Lipoic Acid Catalyzed by an Ionic Liquid Co-Lyophilized Lipase. Molecules. 2015; 20(6):9949-9960. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20069949

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Ning, Lei Wang, Zhi Wang, Liyan Jiang, Zhuofu Wu, Hong Yue, and Xiaona Xie. 2015. "Microwave-Assisted Resolution of α-Lipoic Acid Catalyzed by an Ionic Liquid Co-Lyophilized Lipase" Molecules 20, no. 6: 9949-9960. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20069949

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop