Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction Using Response Surface Methodology for Simultaneous Quantitation of Six Flavonoids in Flos Sophorae Immaturus and Antioxidant Activity
Next Article in Special Issue
Easy Ligand Activation in the Coordination Sphere of Ru inside the [PW11O39]7– Backbone
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Astaxanthin Accumulation in Hepatocytes of Atlantic Salmon Fed Different Diets Using NMR Spectroscopy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules25081770
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polyfunctional Sterically Hindered Catechols with Additional Phenolic Group and Their Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholates: Synthesis, Structure, and Redox Properties

by
Ivan V. Smolyaninov
1,2,
Andrey I. Poddel’sky
3,*,
Susanna A. Smolyaninova
2,
Maxim V. Arsenyev
3,
Georgy K. Fukin
3 and
Nadezhda T. Berberova
2
1
Toxicology Research Group, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Federal Research Centre The Southern Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of The Sciences”, Tatischeva str. 16, 414056 Astrakhan, Russia
2
Department of Chemistry, Astrakhan State Technical University, 16 Tatisheva str., Astrakhan 414056, Russia
3
G.A. Razuvaev Institute of Organometallic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 49 Tropinina str., 603137 Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(8), 1770; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081770
Submission received: 27 March 2020 / Revised: 9 April 2020 / Accepted: 10 April 2020 / Published: 12 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal Based Compounds with “Non-Innocent” Ligands: Structure, Property and Ligand-Driven Reactivity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
New polyfunctional sterically hindered 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechols with an additional phenolic group in the sixth position connected by a bridging sulfur atom—(6-(CH2-S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 (L1), (6-(S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 (L2), and (6-(S-Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 (L3) (3,5-DBCat is dianion 3,5-di-tert-butylcatecolate)—were synthesized and characterized in detail. The exchange reaction between catechols L1 and L3 with triphenylantimony(V) dibromide in the presence of triethylamine leads to the corresponding triphenylantimony(V) catecholates (6-(CH2-S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)SbPh3 (1) and (6-(S-Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)SbPh3 (2). The electrochemical properties of catechols L1–L3 and catecholates 1 and 2 were investigated using cyclic voltammetry. The electrochemical oxidation of L1–L3 at the first stage proceeds with the formation of the corresponding o-benzoquinones. The second process is the oxidation of the phenolic moiety. Complexes 1 and 2 significantly expand their redox capabilities, owing to the fact that they can act as the electron donors due to the catecholate metallocycle capable of sequential oxidations, and as donors of the hydrogen atoms, thus forming a stable phenoxyl radical. The molecular structures of the free ligand L1 and complex 1 in the crystal state were determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

A large amount of data has been accumulated to the present time on the complexes of transition and non-transition elements with redox active ligands: o-benzoquinones, o-iminobenzoquinones and alpha-diimines [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. A feature of these compounds is the participation of not only metal but also redox-active ligands in the processes of electron transfer and, as a result, they are capable of reversible accepting and donating electrons during the different chemical transformations, while remaining bound to the metal. This feature can significantly expand or change the reactivity of metal complexes. Studies of non-transition metal complexes containing redox-active ligands of the o-quinonato type have allowed to reveal an expansion of the valence potentials of non-transition metals due to redox-active ligands [12,13], to observe of the phenomenon of redox isomerism in the main group metals’ chemistry [14], and also to observe and investigate the ability of antimony(V) complexes to reversible fixation of molecular oxygen [15,16,17,18,19], to observe the fixation of nitrogen(II) oxide (by zinc(II) and lead(II) catecholates) [20].
There are several approaches that allow to change the properties of ligands and their metal complexes: (1) a modification of the ligands’ structure by the variation of heteroatoms (O, N, S) or the presence of bulky organic substituents; (2) the introduction of different electron donor/acceptor groups or additional redox-active as well as chelating fragments at various positions of the quinoid ring; and (3) a combination of a redox-active ligand and an additional coordination center. Organic and organometallic compounds containing several redox centers are of particular interest in view of a number of their specific features: the possibility of indirect activation through certain functional groups, intramolecular electron transfer, proton-conjugated electron transfer, etc. From the example of ferrocene derivatives (ferrocifenes) as well as quinoid compounds, it was shown that various types of biological activities (cytotoxicity, antibacterial, antiparasitic, antioxidant) depend directly on the presence of a redox-active group and its transformations [21,22,23,24]. Redox-asymmetric systems can be built not only on the basis of a ferrocenyl fragment but also on a combination of phenolic, amide, and amino groups, which are also of interest because of the possibility of proton-conjugated charge transfer reactions [25,26,27].
For a long time, dioxolenes have attracted the attention of researchers because of the possibility of their existence in several redox states. Recently, the focus of research in this area has been aimed at their functionalization by introducing additional redox-active groups [28,29,30,31] or coordination sites [32,33,34,35]. In the series of functionalized derivatives of catechol/o-quinones, sulfur-containing compounds occupy a special place since sulfide bridge fragments also exhibit redox activity. The introduction of the tetrathiafulvalene linker allows to obtain bis-quinones and their metal complexes which exhibit unusual physicochemical properties [36,37,38,39]. The sterically hindered dithiete-annelated o-benzoquinone is a bifunctional ligand, which combines two chalcogen redox-active coordination centers in its structure—dioxolene and dithiolene—allowing it to form complexes in which various coordination sites are involved [40]. S-functionalization of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-o-benzoquinone with cystamine and cysteine has made it possible to obtain Cu(II), Zn(II), and Ni(II) complexes [41,42]. A similar reaction with dithiols makes it possible to synthesize catechols with a free thio group or bis-catechol thioethers [43,44], which have chelating properties and the ability to be absorbed on the surface [45,46,47]. Variation of the organic groups in thiols allows one to obtain a wide range of thiolated catechols, which exhibit antioxidant, antiradical, and cryoprotective activity [48,49,50]. Transition metal compounds based on sulfur-containing catecholate/o-semiquinolate ligands demonstrate antifungal and antibacterial activity [51,52]. Thus, the synthesis and study of the properties of thiolated dioxiolene ligands and metal complexes based on them is relevant in view of the diversity of the properties manifested. Antimony(III/V) derivatives are used as antiparasitic agents in the treatment of leishmaniasis [53], and have potential as antitumor, cytotoxic, and antibacterial substances [54,55]. Along with biological activity, antimony complexes are promising compounds for the design of functional materials. The presence of a catecholate cycle at the antimony atom allows the creation of new colorimetric and fluorescent sensors for the fluoride anion [56,57,58,59]. The polymer compositions containing catecholate derivatives of triphenylantimony(V) are promising for the creation of polymeric materials capable of fixing oxygen [60,61,62].
In the present paper, we report on new thioethers combining several redox-active centers: A chelating catechol fragment, a phenolic group, and a thioether linker. The coordinating activity of the catechol fragment was studied in a reaction with triphenylantimony(V) dibromide, and as a result, triphenylantimony(V) catecholates, which contain redox-active centers of a different nature, were synthesized. The molecular structure and electrochemical transformations of the resulting compounds are discussed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization

The sterically hindered catechol (6-(CH2-S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 (L1) was synthesized from 6-methoxymethyl-3,5-di-tert-butylcatechol (6-CH2OMe-3,5-Cat)H2 and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-mercaptophenol in a solution of acetic acid at 60°C (Scheme 1(1)). The 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechols (6-(S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 (L2) and (6-(S-Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 (L3) were prepared by the reaction of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-o-benzoquinone with 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-mercaptophenol or 4-mercaptophenol [48], respectively, in ethanol solution (Scheme 1(2)).
Catechols L1, L2 were isolated as pale-yellow microcrystalline powders that were well-soluble in toluene or chloroform. The composition of these catechols was determined by means of IR-, 1H, and 13C{1H} NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. A prolonged recrystallization of L1 from n-hexane allowed X-ray-quality white crystals of L1 to be grown.
A substitution reaction between catechols L1 or L3 and triphenylantimony(V) dibromide in the presence of two equivalents of triethylamine in toluene solution leads to the corresponding triphenylantimony(V) catecholates (Scheme 2).
Complexes 1 and 2 were isolated as yellow solids. These compounds are readily soluble in common organic solvents, such as aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons, chloroform, ethers, and methanol. Complexes 1 and 2 were characterized by IR-, 1H, and 13C{1H} NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The X-ray suitable crystals of 1 were grown by the prolonged (during 5 days) crystallization of complex in toluene solution at −18°C.

2.2. Molecular Structures

The molecular structure of catechol L1 in crystal is shown on Figure 1. The general geometrical parameters of catechol fragment are typical for this class of compounds. The carbon–carbon bonds in a ring C(1-6) have an average distance of 1.401 ± 0.014 Å, which is typical of aromatic systems. The carbon–oxygen distances are ordinary [63] and close to each other: the bonds O(1)-C(1), O(2)-C(2), and O(3)-C(11) are 1.3816(14), 1.3804(14), and 1.3806(14) Å, respectively. The molecule is not planar, the angle between catechol and phenolic aromatic rings planes is equal to 54.7(1)°, the torsion angle is 47.9(1)°, and the torsion angle C(1)C(6)C(7)S(1) is 56.7(1)°. Such distortion of geometry is supported by an intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the molecule: the distance O(2)-H(2)…O(1) is 2.07(1) Å, angle O(2)-H(2)-O(1) is 126.6(1)°, and the distance O(1)-H(1)…S(1) is 2.28(1) Å, angle O(1)-H(1)-S(1) is 153.0(1)°. In the crystal, molecules form pairs due to the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between phenolic hydroxyl groups (Figure S9). The intermolecular distances O(3)-H(3)…O(3′) are 1.71(1) Å, and the corresponding angles O(3)-H(3)-O(3′) are 113.5(1)°. The distance between the planes of catecholate rings in neighboring pairs is 3.49(1) Å, which is close to the sum of the Van der Waals radii of carbon atoms [64].
The molecular structure of triphenylantimony(V) catecholate 1 in crystal is shown in Figure 2. The central antimony atom Sb(1) has a distorted square pyramidal geometry with an O,O’-chelating ligand and two phenyl groups in the basal plane. The bond angles in the base of pyramid O(1)-Sb(1)-C(30) and O(2)-Sb(1)-C(36) are 156.73(6) and 142.01(7)°. The bond Sb(1)-C(42) with the apical phenyl group is approximately 0.028(2)-0.033(2) Å shorter than the equatorial bonds Sb(1)-C(30) and Sb(1)-C(36). The planes of the aromatic rings C(16-21) and C(1-6) of the phenolic group and the catecholate ligand, respectively, lie at an angle of 57.6(1)º. The arylthio-fragment in 1 is stronger turned away from the catecholate ring than in catechol L1, the torsion angle C(2)C(3)C(7)S(1) in 1 is 77.9(1)° (vs. 56.7(1)° in L1), and the torsion angle C(3)C(7)S(1)C(16) is 138.1(1)° (vs. 47.9(1)° in L1).
The oxygen-to-carbon bonds O(1)-C(1) and O(2)-C(2) (1.358(2) and 1.366(2) Å, respectively) are ordinary and typical for catecholato complexes of different metals [65], and bond O(3)-C(19) (1.376(2) Å) is the longest O-C bond in 1, which is typical for sterically hindered phenols [66,67,68]. The six-membered carbon ring C(1-6) is aromatic, with average C-C bond distances of 1.400 ± 0.015 Å, which is very close to the same value for catechol L1. In general, the geometrical characteristics of the redox-active catecholato ligand in 1 are typical for various antimony(V) catecholates [69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79].
In the crystal, molecules 1 form layers, where one can find intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the phenol group of one complex molecule and the sulfur atom of a neighboring complex molecule (Figure S10) with a distance O(3)-H(1)…S(1) of 2.86(1) Å and corresponding angle O(3)-H(1)-S(1) of 115.5(1)°.

2.3. Electrochemistry

The electrochemical properties of catechol thioethers L1-L3 and triphenylantimony(V) catecholate complexes 1, 2 were investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in CH2Cl2 and MeCN solutions containing 0.15 M NBu4ClO4 (TBAP) as the supporting electrolyte at a glassy carbon working electrode. The redox potentials given in Table 1; Table 2 are referenced to Ag/AgCl/KCl(sat.) electrode.
Compounds L1-L3 are characterized by the presence of multiple electroactive fragments: catechol, phenolic group, and thioether linker, which affects their electrochemical behavior. The electrooxidation of the target catechol thioethers occurs in three or two successive stages depending on the applied solvent. Figure 3 shows the cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of L1 in acetonitrile solution. The CV of L1 in dichloromethane is shown in Figure S11 of ESI. The first two-electron electrochemical stage is ascribed to the irreversible oxidation of the catechol fragment in the case of compounds L1 and L3. A similar behavior is typical for substituted catechols in aprotic solvents: 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechol has an irreversible oxidation peak at 1.11 (CH3CN) or 1.23 V (CH2Cl2). In the first stage, the mechanism of electooxidation involves electron transfer followed by fast deprotonation, leading to o-quinone formation (Scheme 3).
Earlier spectroelectrochemical investigations of catechol L3 have shown that electrolysis at the controlled potential leads to the formation of the corresponding o-benzoquinone [48]. The formation of the o-quinone structure is accompanied by the appearance of a wide absorption band at 400–500 nm. A wide absorption band in the visible spectral range is a characteristic feature of compounds containing a quinoid fragment [80]. The spectroelectrochemistry of L1 under the controlled potential electrolysis also confirms the formation of the corresponding o-benzoquinone.
As a result of electrooxidation, new absorption with a maximum at 410 nm was observed in the visible region of the spectrum and the intensity of this band increased with time (Figure 4). Additionaly, the second characteristic band of lower intensity in the form of a shoulder to the main band appears in the region of 590 nm, which corresponds to the n-π * transition in quinones.
The absorption band in the visible spectral range corresponds to a π-π* transition, which is a characteristic for compounds containing a quinonoid fragment like 3.5-di-tert-butyl-o-benzoquinone [81]. The CV of L1 after electrolysis in the cathodic region contains a quasi-reversible peak at E1/2 = −0.58 V (Figure S12 of ESI). This peak is assigned to the reduction of electrogenerated o-benzoquinone to o-benzosemiquinone.
The second oxidation peak on CVs of catechols L1, L3 may be assigned to the oxidation of the phenolic group. In acetonitrile, for compounds L1 and L3, the shift of the second oxidation potential to the cathode region occurs as compared to the oxidation of the well-known phenolic antioxidant (ionol)—2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol 1.47 V (CH3CN). In dichloromethane, the oxidation potentials of L1 and L3 are close to the value for this phenolic compound (1.48 V). The presence of the thioether group causes the appearance of the third redox wave at high anodic potentials. For L1 and L3 in acetonitrile, the values Eox3 are in good agreement with the data on the oxidation of catechol thioethers: the electrooxidation of the thioether group occurs in the potential range from 1.59 to 1.67 V. On the CVs of L1, L3 in dichloromethane, two oxidation waves only are observed and they are shifted to the anodic region by 0.15 and 0.19 V in comparison with the data in MeCN. Obviously, the third anode process occurs at the higher anodic potential restricted by the electrochemical oxidation of the solvent.
The CV of L2 in dichloromethane solution has three oxidation peaks like the CVs of L1 and L3 in acetonitrile (Figure 5).
In contrast to the above described catechol-thioesters L1 and L3, the first and second oxidation stages for compound L2 are quasi-reversible. The obtained values of the current ratio (Ic/Ia) indicate a low stability of the electrically generated intermediates. The introduction of tert-butyl groups helps to stabilize the dication formed in the first stage (like in the case of L1); however, nevertheless, a rapid deprotonation reaction occurs in the solution, and, as a result, a small reduction peak is observed in the reverse scan of CV. At the second stage, one-electron oxidation of a sterically hindered phenolic fragment leads to the formation of a cation-radical intermediate, which is more stable over the time of the CV experiment (Scheme 4).
The third anode peak at the potential of 1.77 V suggests the participation of the thioether fragment in further redox transformations.
It should be noted that the presence of an electron-withdrawing sulfur atom in the catecholate ring or the presence of a methylene bridge between the aromatic ring and the heteroatom does not practically affect the oxidation potentials of compounds L1 and L3 in dichloromethane (Table 1). At the same time, the first oxidation potential (0.05 V) for L3 is shifted to the anode region as compared with 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechol in accordance with the electro-acceptor effect of the sulfur atom. In acetonitrile, such changes are less pronounced. In dichloromethane, for compounds L2 and L3, which differ by the absence or presence of tert-butyl groups in the phenolic fragment, a shift of the oxidation potentials (0.11 and 0.10 V) for L2 to the anode region is observed. This behavior can be rationalized by the formation of stronger intramolecular hydrogen bonds between the catechol hydroxyl and the sulfur atom than in the case of compound L1. Using S-functionalized phenols as an example, such an interaction led to an increase in the bond-breaking energy, BDE (O-H) [82]. The 4-hydroxyphetylthio group introduced into the catecholate cycle exhibits an electron-withdrawing effect, which is expressed for L2 in a significant shift (0.14 V) of the first oxidation potential to the anode region as compared with 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechol.
As in the case of free ligands, the solvent has a significant effect on the electrochemical behavior of complexes 1 and 2. In dichloromethane, for both complexes, the first stage of oxidation has a quasi-reversible one-electron character and leads to the formation of relatively stable (in the CV time scale) monocationic complexes of the type [(SQ)SbPh3]+ (Scheme 5) [83,84]. The value of the Eox11/2 potential for 1 is similar to the data obtained for triphenylantimony(V) 3,6-di-tert-butylcatecholate [85]. For the complex 2, this value shifts by 0.06 V to the anode region, which is associated with the electron-withdrawing effect of the sulfur atom, which is not separated from the catecholate ring by the methylene group as in case of 1. Such changes are in good agreement with previously obtained results for triarylantimony(V) 6-chloro(bromo)-3,5-di-tert-butylcatecholates [86,87]. The introduction of a methylene group between the catecholate fragment and the 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenylthio group has no practically effect on the value of the Eox11/2 potential, as in the case of 6-alkoxymethyl-substituted 3,5-di-tert-butylcatecholates of triphenylantimony(V) [88].
For complex 1, the second anode peak has a quasi-reversible character (Figure 6). A double increase in the current of the second oxidation peak as compared to the first one indicates an increase in the number of electrons involved in this electrode process to two.
The value of the peak potential Eox2p = 1.39 V on the CV of 1 is fixed in the potential range of 1.37–1.60 V, which is characteristic of the second redox process “o-semiquinone/o-benzoquinone” in such triarylantimony(V) catecholates [89,90,91]. This electrochemical picture in the case of 1 indicates the convergence of the boundary redox orbitals of o-semiquinone and phenolic fragments in 1+, which leads to their simultaneous electrooxidation. A decrease in the ratio of currents to 0.5 for the second oxidation process is caused by the subsequent chemical stages in the solution—deprotonation of the phenoxyl radical cation and decoordination of o-benzoquinone moiety from the tricationic intermediate.
In complex 2, these redox centers behave separately: The second oxidation stage at 1.24 V is irreversible and assigned to the further oxidation of coordinated o-benzosemiquinone in the intermediate [(SQ)SbPh3]+ (2+) to o-benzoquinone, with the subsequent decoordination of o-benzoquinone from 22+ leading to the complex decomposition (Scheme 6). The third redox process is a two-electronic peak, which is an oxidation of the phenolic group in free o-benzoquinone at 1.48 V (Figure 7).
The potential value of this third redox-stage is identical with that one for the oxidation of the phenolic group in free L3 and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (1.48 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [92].
In a coordinating solvent acetonitrile (Table 2), the oxidation potentials for complexes 1 and 2, as it was expected, shift slightly to the cathode region. In the whole, the electrochemical behavior of the complexes changes. The CV of 1 in acetonitrile has three oxidation waves (Figure S13).
In acetonitrile, the current of the first quasi-reversible oxidation peak for 1 increases twice to a two-electron level, and the ratio of currents Ic/Ia decreases in comparison with the data obtained for 1 in dichloromethane. These changes indicate the generation of an unstable dicationic intermediate [(Q)SbPh3]2+ in the near-electrode region. Earlier, we observed a similar electrochemical activity for the triphenylantimony(V) catecholates containing electron-withdrawing groups in the catecholate cycle, but in most cases, the dicationic derivatives formed in the electrooxidation were unstable [90,91]. The second wide quasi-reversible oxidation peak at 1.24 V is single electron in nature. The low value of the current ratio, as in the first case, indicates the instability of the resulting intermediate and the course of the subsequent chemical stage. The proximity of the redox orbitals of the catecholate ligand and the sterically hindered phenol fragment does not allow us to unambiguously describe the oxidative transformations at the first and second stages of oxidation. Based on the value of the first oxidation potential, we may assume that the dianionic catecholate fragment is oxidized initially to o-benzoquinone, accompanied by an electron transfer from the phenolic group to the dication (Scheme 7). The second anode process may equally be attributed to the oxidation of a coordinated o-semiquinone radical anion to o-benzoquinone or to the oxidation of a di-tert-butylphenol moiety to a radical cation.
The electrooxidation of 2 in acetonitrile (Figure 8) has a quasi-reversible one-electron character at the first stage (as in dichloromethane), which indicates the generation of a monocation complex containing a coordinated o-semiquinone ligand.
A significant difference of the electrochemical behavior of 2 in acetonitrile from the electrochemical picture of 2 in dichloromethane is the absence of a separation of the second and third stages of oxidation: There is one two-electron oxidation peak. Complex 2 in acetonitrile exhibits a behavior similar to 1 in dichloromethane: Both redox active fragments of the ligand are involved in the second stage of oxidation, namely the o-semiquinone ligand is converted to o-benzoquinone, and the phenolic group is oxidized to the radical cation.
The synthesized ligands (as well as the complexes based on them) contain several electroactive centers. Complexes 1 and 2 significantly expand their redox capabilities owing to the fact that they can act as: (1) electron donors due to the catecholate metallocycle capable of sequential oxidations, and (2) donors of the hydrogen atoms forming a stable phenoxyl radical. This ability of ligands can be used in catalysis in coordination with transition metal ions.
In contrast to the previously studied triphenylantimony(V) catecholato complexes with additional redox centers (ferrocenyl, morpholine, piperazine groups [18,24,30]), whose electrochemical activation is observed at potentials shifted to the cathode region as compared to the “catechol/o-semiquinone” transition, compounds 1 and 2 are characterized by electrooxidation of the phenolic fragment at potentials that are close to the second redox transition “o-semiquinone/o-benzoquinone”. This fact indicates the convergence of the boundary redox orbitals of the phenolic and o-semiquinone fragments in the electro-generated monocationic complexes.

2.4. EPR Experiments

The oxidation of the catechol thioether L1 with lead dioxide in toluene proceeds slowly. In this case, immediately after mixing the reagents, a superposition of two doublets was observed (Figure S14(1)). One of the doublets has the following parameters: gi = 2.0020, ai(1H) = 3.6 G, the second: gi = 2.0009, ai(1H) = 3.85 G. The intensive stirring and heating of the reaction mixture leads to an increase in the intensity of the EPR spectrum, and the intensity of the second doublet grows significantly more noticeably in comparison with the intensity of the first doublet (Figure S14(2)). An increase in the signal intensity allows one to see the satellite splitting of the second signal on magnetic isotopes of lead (207Pb, I = 1/2, 22.1% [93]) with the hyper-fine structure (HFS) constant ai(207Pb) = 70.5 G. The doublet with satellite splitting was simulated using the WinEPR SimFonia 1.25 program, and the simulation spectrum is shown in Figure S14(3).
It can be concluded that the interaction of catechol L1 with lead dioxide slowly leads to the deprotonation of catechol with the formation of the o-semiquinone radical anion at the first stage (Scheme 8), which has a doublet with parameters gi = 2.0020, ai(1H) = 3.6 G without any satellite splitting on the lead isotopes.
The process accelerates when the mixture is heated; however, the formation of o-semiquinone complex with lead(II) occurs, the EPR spectrum of which increases in intensity with the heating of the sample (the second EPR spectrum).
The oxidation of catechol L2 with lead dioxide in a toluene solution proceeds more easily than the oxidation of L1 and does not require heating. In this case, initially (Figure 9(1)), a wide doublet appears with the parameters gi = 1.9967, ai(1H) = 2.3 G, which disappears gradually with further stirring of the reaction mixture (Figure 9(2)) with the simultaneous appearance of a triplet with some other parameters (gi = 2.0050, ai(21H) = 1.1 G). Twenty minutes after the beginning reaction, only one triplet signal is observed practically (Figure 9(3)). Both spectra were simulated using WinEPR SimFonia 1.25. Simulations of the triplet and doublet spectra are shown in Figure 9(4),(5), respectively.
The oxidation of L2 with lead dioxide proceeds with the deprotonation of catechol with the formation of the o-semiquinone radical (Scheme 9), and the doublet signal from this radical is recorded at the initial time. However, a decrease in the intensity of this signal and an increase in the intensity of the triplet with the HFS constant on two equivalent protons of 1.1 G characteristic of 4,6-di-tert-butyl-phenoxyl radicals gradually occurs. Thus, we can conclude that either the o-semiquinone formed at the initial stage oxidizes and deprotonates the phenolic group to form a phenoxyl radical during the reaction, or (since the reaction with lead dioxide is heterogeneous, requiring an excess of oxidizing agent) during the reaction, oxidation of the 4,6-di-tert-butylphenol group in the catechol proceeds more slowly than the oxidation of the catechol fragment, and at a certain moment, the concentration of the o-semiquinone radical begins to decrease with a simultaneous increase in the concentration of the phenoxyl radical.
Earlier, it was shown that thioether L3 is oxidized by lead(IV) oxide in toluene solution with the formation of lead o-semiquinonato derivatives [14a]. In the EPR spectrum, a doublet at gi = 2.0004 with satellite splitting, typical for lead(II) o-semiquinolates, was observed. This fact is also explained by the initial formation of the o-semiquinone radical anion further coordinated to metal. The hyperfine structure of the EPR spectrum of a system “L3+PbO2” is caused by hyperfine splitting of a signal on the one proton nucleus in the fifth position of the o-semiquinone six-membered carbon ring with a satellite splitting on the magnetic lead isotope (207Pb, 22.1%, I = 1/2): ai(1H) = 2.65 G, ai(207Pb) = 22.75 G [48].
The oxidation of triphenylantimony(V) catecholate 1 with lead(IV) oxide in toluene proceeds with weak heating (to 50°C) and leads to the formation of the corresponding phenoxyl radical (Scheme 10) with an isotropic multiplet EPR spectrum (Figure 10) with gi = 2.0050. The spectrum was simulated with Easyspin 5.2.25 [94], and the following HFS constants were revealed: the hyperfine coupling with two aromatic protons in meta-positions to the oxy group with ai(2 1H) = 0.89 G, and coupling with two non-equivalent protons of the S-CH2 group in the para-position of the phenoxyl ring with ai(1 1H) = 1.97 G and ai(1 1H) = 3.30 G. The nonequivalence of these methylene protons is caused by their different positions towards the pi-system of the phenoxyl radical.
The EPR data of experiments on the oxidation of free ligands indicate the tendency of L1 and L2 to form o-semiquinone radical anions. The difference is the great propensity of L1 to form stable chelate rings, while for L2 the subsequent generation of a stable phenoxyl radical is possible. Complex 1 in reaction with lead(IV) oxide tends to form a phenoxyl radical, which is consistent with the possibility of simultaneous activation of the catecholate cycle and the phenolic group during electrooxidation in a polar solvent (MeCN).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Remarks

All the experiments on the synthesis and study of properties of complexes were carried out in evacuated ampoules in the absence of oxygen and water. The solvents used were purified and dried by standard methods [95]. The infrared spectra of the complexes in the 4000-400 cm−1 range were recorded on an FSM 1201 Fourier-IR spectrometer in nujol mull. The NMR spectra of L1 and L2 were recorded in CDCl3 solution using a “Bruker DPX 200” instrument (200 MHz for 1H, and ~50 MHz for 13C), and the NMR spectra of 1 and 2 were recorded in CDCl3 solution using a “Bruker ARX 400” instrument (400 MHz for 1H, and ~100 MHz for 13C), with Me4Si as the internal standard. The C, H, S elemental analysis was performed on an Elemental Analyzer “Elementar vario EL Cube”; the antimony content was accomplished by combustion analysis.

3.2. Cyclic Voltammetry

The electrochemical studies were carried out using IPC-Pro potentiostate in three-electrode mode. The stationary glassy carbon (d = 2 mm) disk was used as the working electrode; the auxiliary electrode was a platinum-flag electrode. The reference electrode was Ag/AgCl/KCl(sat.) with a watertight diaphragm. All measurements were carried out under argon. The samples were dissolved in the pre-deaerated solvent. The rate scan was 0.2 Vs−1. The supporting electrolyte 0.15 M [Bu4N]ClO4 (99%, «Acros») underwent recrystallization twice from aqueous EtOH and then it was dried in vacuum (48 h) under 50°C. The concentration of the compounds was 1.5–4.0 mM.

3.3. X-Ray Diffraction Studies

The X-ray diffraction data were collected on a SMART APEX I (L1, 1) diffractometer (graphite monochromated, MoKα-radiation, ω-scan technique, λ = 0.71073 Å) at 100 K. The intensity data were integrated by the SAINT program [96]. SADABS [97] was used to perform area-detector scaling and absorption corrections. The structures were solved by direct methods and were refined on F2 using the SHELXTL package [98]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. All hydrogen atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and treated as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq (Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq for the hydrogen atoms in CH3 groups) of their parent atoms. Crystal data and details of the data collection and structure refinement for L1 and 1 are given in Table S1. The selected bond lengths for L1 are listed in Table S2, and the selected bond angles for 1 are in Table S3 of ESI. The structure parameters were deposited with the Cambridge Structural Database (CCDC 1978538 (L1) and 1978539 (1); [email protected] or http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif).

3.4. Synthesis of Catechol Thioethers

3,5-Di-tert-butyl-6-methoxymethylcatechol and 4,6-di-tert-butyl-3-(4-hydroxyphenylthio)catechol (L3) were synthesized according to previous reports [8c,14a].

3.4.1. 4,6-Di-tert-butyl-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl-thiomethyl)catechol L1

Ligand was prepared according the next procedure: 3,5-di-tert-butyl-6-methoxymethylcatechol (1.5 mmol, 0.400 g) and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-mercaptophenol (1.5 mmol, 0.357 g) were dissolved in acetic acid (15 mL) under argon atmosphere, then the mixture was heated for 12 h at 60 °C. Further water (25 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and a precipitate was filtrated. The product was dried under vacuum, then it was recrystallized from n-hexane to form white crystals. The yield was 0.37 g (52%). M.p. 174–176 °C. Anal. calc. for C29H44O3S (%): C, 73.68; H, 9.38; S, 6.78; found: C, 73.54; H, 9.42; S, 6.70. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 1.22 (s., 9 H, tBu, Cat), 1.37 (s., 18 H, tBu, Phenol), 1.42 (s., 9 H, tBu, Cat), 4.35 (s., 2 H, CH2-S), 5.30 (s., 1 H, OH), 6.12 (s., 1 H, OH), 6.89 (s., 1 H, arom. C6H1), 7.18 (s., 2 H, arom. C6H2), 7.26 (s., 1 H, OH). 13C{1H} NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 29.48, 30.07, 31.99, 34.27, 34.93, 35.43, 36.40, 116.73, 119.28, 121.59, 130.95, 133.64, 136.78, 138.71, 142.91, 143.34, 154.59. FT-IR (KBr): ν = 3629, 3510, 3198, 3057, 2955, 2910, 2870, 1481, 1425, 1370, 1290, 1235, 1144 cm−1.

3.4.2. 4,6-Di-tert-butyl-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl-thio)catechol L2

This ligand was prepared according to the followed protocol. 2,6-Di-tert-butyl-4-mercaptophenol (1 mmol, 0.238 g) in 10 mL ethanol was added dropwise to a solution of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-o-benzoquione in 20 mL of ethanol (0.5 mmol, 0.110 g) over a period of 2–3 h and the mixture was stirred under argon till decoloration of the reaction media at room temperature. The volume was concentrated under a reduced pressure to yield a crude solid. The product was recrystallized from dry ethanol, dried under vacuum, and isolated as yellow powder. The yield was 0.08 g (35%). M.p. 165–167 °C. Anal. calc. for C28H42O3S (%): C, 73.32; H, 9.23; S, 6.99; found: C, 73.48; H, 9.26; S, 6.87. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 1.25 (s., 18H, tBu), 1.31 (s., 9H, tBu), 1.41 (s., 9H, tBu), 4.93 (s., 1H, OH), 6.87 (s., 1H, C6H1), 6.91 (s, 2H, C6H2). 13C{1H} NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 29.35, 29.63, 34.90, 34.98, 35.02, 118.05, 119.13, 127.73, 134.06, 136.00, 136.29, 138.40, 143.23, 146.14. FT-IR (KBr): ν = 3629, 3485, 2958, 2908, 2868, 1644, 1663, 1485, 1458, 1392, 1363, 1218, 1164 cm−1.

3.5. Synthesis of Complexes

3.5.1. Complex (6-(CH2-S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)SbPh3 (1)

A solution of 4,6-di-tert-butyl-3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl-thiomethyl)catechol L1 (0.236 g, 0.5 mmol) in 25 mL of toluene was added with stirring to a toluene solution of triphenylantimony dibromide (0.256 g, 0.5 mmol, 10–15 mL of toluene) under argon atmosphere. Then two equivalents of the triethylamine (0.14 mL, 1 mmol) were added to the toluene solution. After the addition of reagents and changing the color of the solution by yellow to orange, the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h. The formed white precipitate of triethylammonium bromide was filtered off. The volume of filtrate was concentrated under a reduced pressure to a half volume and stored at −18°C for five days. The X-ray-suitable yellow crystals of 1 were collected by decantation, and dried under vacuum. The yield was 0.300 g (73%). Anal. calc. for C47H57O3SSb (%): C, 68.53; H, 6.97; S, 3.89; Sb, 14.78. Found (%): C, 68.62; H, 7.05; S, 4.01; Sb, 14.53. 1H NMR (400 MHz, δ, ppm): 1.40 (s, 18H, tBu), 1.41 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.42 (s, 9H, tBu), 4.55 (s, 2H, CH2S), 5.18 (s, 1H, OH), 6.70 (s, 1H, arom. C6H1), 7.36 (s, 2H, arom. C6H2), 7.40–7.50 (m, 9H, Ph), 7.87–7.91 (m, 6H, Ph). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, δ, ppm): 29.63, 30.19, 32.43, 34.36, 34.65, 35.85, 36.48, 112.61, 117.58, 127.81, 128.75, 129.06, 131.02, 131.66, 135.44, 136.27, 136.75, 137.81, 142.56, 147.52, 152.86. FT-IR (KBr): ν = 3541, 3068, 3045, 2957, 2910, 2873, 1580, 1480, 1431, 1394, 1360, 1258, 1240, 1168 cm−1.

3.5.2. Complex (6-(S-Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)SbPh3 (2)

A solution of the 4,6-di-tert-butyl-3-(4-hydroxyphenylthio)catechol (0.173 g, 0.5 mmol) in 20 mL of toluene was added dropwise with stirring to a toluene solution of triphenylantimony dibromide (0.256 g, 0.5 mmol, 10–15 mL of toluene) under argon atmosphere. Then two equivalents of the triethylamine (0.14 mL, 1 mmol) were added to toluene solution. After the addition of reagents and changing the color of the solution to pale yellow, the reaction mixture was stirred for 2 h. The formed white precipitate of ammonium salt was filtered off. The volume was concentrated under a reduced pressure to yield a yellow crude solid. The product was recrystallized from a mixture of the solvents pentane and hexane (v/v = 1/1), dried under vacuum, and isolated as a yellow powder of 2. The yield was 0.175 g (50%). Anal. calc. for C38H39O3SSb (%): C, 65.43; H, 5.64; S, 4.60; Sb, 17.46. Found (%): C, 65.30; H, 5.72; S, 4.55; Sb, 17.60. 1H NMR (400 MHz, δ, ppm): 1.45 (s, 9H, tBu), 1.51 (s, 9H, tBu), 4.51 (br.s, 1H, OH), 6.51 (d.m, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H,C6H4), 6.82 (s, 1H, Ar), 6.94 (d.m, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, C6H4), 7.35–7.41 (m, 6H, Ar), 7.43–7.48 (m, 3H, Ar), 7.51–7.56 (m, 6H, Ar). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, δ, ppm): 29.53, 31.46, 34.80, 36.69, 112.63, 113.01, 115.48, 127.64, 129.03, 131.00, 131.34, 133.45, 135.10, 137.32, 141.25, 143.19, 149.86, 152.48. FT-IR (KBr): ν = 3411, 3056, 2958, 2910, 2870, 1490, 1431, 1397, 1257, 1238, 1167 cm−1.

4. Conclusions

Thus, in this work, new polyfunctional sterically hindered catechols with an additional phenolic group connected by a bridging sulfur atom, as well as triphenylantimony(V) catecholates based on these ligands, were synthesized. The molecular structures of free ligand L1 and complex 1 in the crystal state were determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis. The electrochemical investigations have shown that the electrooxidation of ligands in the first stage leads to the formation of the corresponding o-benzoquinones. The second anode stage involves the oxidation of the phenolic moiety. The results of the EPR studies confirmed the primary oxidation of the catechol group with the formation of the o-semiquinone radical anion. The electrooxidation of complexes 1 and 2 in dichloromethane is somewhat different from each other. For compound 2, the three oxidation stages are clearly fixed, the first two stages correspond to the conversion of the catecholate form of the ligand to o-benzosemiquinone and then to o-benzoquinone, and the third peak characterizes the oxidation of the phenolic fragment. For complex 1, the first redox stage also affects the catecholate group, and the second redox process can involve both o-semiquinone and phenolic fragments in this electrode process.
In the coordinating solvent (acetonitrile), the electrochemical behavior of compound 2 becomes identical to that one for complex 1 in dichloromethane. At the same time, in acetonitrile for complex 1, the current of the first anode peak increases significantly, which implies two-electron oxidation leading to a dication containing the one-electron oxidized form of the catecholate ligand and phenoxyl radical. The oxidation of complex 1 in toluene with lead dioxide leads to the fixation of the phenoxyl radical. This indicates the possibility of activation of the phenolic group during electrooxidation. The combination of electrochemical and spectral data indicates the convergence of the boundary redox orbitals of the phenolic and o-semiquinone fragments in the electro-generated monocationic triphenylantimony(V) complexes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/25/8/1770/s1, Figures S1–S8: The NMR spectra of compounds, Table S1: Crystal data and structure refinement for L1 and 1, Table S2: The selected bond lengths for L1, Table S3: The selected bond lengths for 1, Figure S9: The intermolecular hydrogen bonds in crystals of L1, Figure S10: The order of complex 1 molecules in crystal cell with the indication of intermolecular hydrogen bonding, Figure S11: The CVs of compound L1 (CH2Cl2), Figure S12: the CV of the electrolysis products of compound L1, Figure S13: The CVs of compound 1 (CH3CN), Figure S14: The X-band EPR spectrum of the mixture “L1 + PbO2”. CCDC 1978538 (L1) and 1978539 (1) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Author Contributions

Methodology, I.V.S.; resources and synthesis of precursors, M.V.A. and S.A.S.; synthesis of ligands, S.A.S.; synthesis of complexes, I.V.S. and A.I.P.; NMR and EPR investigations, A.I.P.; cyclic voltammetry, S.A.S. and I.V.S.; X-ray analysis, G.K.F.; supervision and project administration, N.T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, I.V.S., M.V.A. and A.I.P.; funding acquisition, I.V.S., A.I.P. and N.T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Researches, project number 19-29-08003 mk. The spectroscopic and X-ray structural investigations of compounds were performed in the accordance with state assignment of IOMC RAS.

Acknowledgments

The spectroscopic and X-ray structural investigations of compounds were performed using the equipment of the analytical center of IOMC RAS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pierpont, C.G.; Buchanan, R.M. Transition metal complexes of o-benzoquinone, o-semiquinone, and catecholate ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1981, 38, 45–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mederos, A.; Dominguez, S.; Hernandez-Molina, R.; Sanchiz, J.; Brito, F. Coordinating ability of phenylenediamines. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1999, 193, 913–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pierpont, C.G. Studies on charge distribution and valence tautomerism in transition metal complexes of catecholate and semiquinonate ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 216, 99–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pierpont, C.G. Unique properties of transition metal quinone complexes of the MQ3 series. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 219, 415–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zanello, P.; Corsini, M. Homoleptic, mononuclear transition metal complexes of 1,2-dioxolenes: Updating their electrochemical-to-structural (X-ray) properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 2000–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Transition metal complexes with bulky 4,6-di-tert-butyl-N-aryl(alkyl)-o-iminobenzoquinonato ligands: Structure, EPR and magnetism. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 291–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kaim, W.; Schwederski, B. Non-innocent ligands in bioinorganic chemistry—An overview. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 1580–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaim, W. The shrinking world of innocent ligands: Conventional and non-conventional redox-active ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 2012, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kaim, W.; Paretzki, A. Interacting metal and ligand based open shell systems: Challenges for experiment and theory. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 344, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaim, W.; Beyer, K.; Filippou, V.; Záliš, S. Charge and spin coupling in copper compounds with hemilabile noninnocent ligands—Ambivalence in three dimensions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 355, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaim, W.; Das, A.; Fiedler, J.; Záliš, S.; Sarkar, B. NO and NO2 as non-innocent ligands: A comparison. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 404, 213114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Piskunov, A.V.; Chegerev, M.G.; Fukin, G.K. Redox-induced C–C bond formation reaction between mono-o-amidophenolate tin complexes and allylhalides. J. Organometal. Chem. 2016, 803, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chegerev, M.G.; Piskunov, A.V.; Maleeva, A.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Multiple Reactivity of SnII Complexes Bearing Catecholate and o-Amidophenolate Ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 3813–3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chegerev, M.G.; Piskunov, A.V.; Starikova, A.A.; Kubrin, S.P.; Fukin, G.K.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Redox Isomerism in Main-Group Chemistry: Tin Complex with o-Iminoquinone Ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1087–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abakumov, G.A.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Grunova, E.V.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Fukin, G.K.; Kurskii, Yu.A.; Abakumova, L.G. Reversible Binding of Dioxygen by a Non-transition-Metal Complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2767–2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A.; Grunova, E.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Fukin, G.K.; Baranov, E.V.; Kurskii, Y.A.; Abakumova, L.G. Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholates and o-Amidophenolates: Reversible Binding of Molecular Oxygen. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 3916–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Kurskii, Yu.A.; Fukin, G.K.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. New morpholine- and piperazine-functionalised triphenylantimony(V) catecholates: The spectroscopic and electrochemical studies. J. Organometal. Chem. 2010, 695, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fukin, G.K.; Baranov, E.V.; Poddel´sky, A.I.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Reversible Binding of Molecular Oxygen to Catecholate and Amidophenolate Complexes of SbV: Electronic and Steric Factors. ChemPhysChem 2012, 13, 3773–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Poddel’skii, A.I.; Okhlopkova, L.S.; Meshcheryakova, I.N.; Druzhkov, N.O.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Fukin, G.K. Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholates Based on o-Quinones, Derivatives of Benzo[b][1,4]-Dioxines and Benzo[b][1,4]-Dioxepines. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2019, 45, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ilyakina, E.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Binding of NO by nontransition metal complexes. Mendeleev Commun. 2012, 22, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Paiva, Y.G.; da Rocha Ferreira, F.; Silva, T.L.; Labbé, E.; Buriez, O.; Amatore, C.; Goulart, M.O.F. Electrochemically Driven Supramolecular Interaction of Quinones and Ferrocifens: An Example of Redox Activation of Bioactive Compounds. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 136–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Amatore, C.; Labbe, E.; Buriez, O. Molecular electrochemistry: A central method to understand the metabolic activation of therapeutic agents. The example of metallocifen anti-cancer drug candidates. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2017, 2, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lee, H.Z.S.; Chau, F.; Top, S.; Jaouen, G.; Vessieres, A.; Labbe, E.; Buriez, O. New mechanistic insights into osmium-based tamoxifen derivatives. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 302, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Smolyaninov, I.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Baryshnikova, S.V.; Kuzmin, V.V.; Korchagina, E.O.; Arsenyev, M.V.; Smolyaninova, S.A.; Berberova, N.T. Electrochemical transformations and evaluation of antioxidant activity of some Schiff bases containing ferrocenyl and (thio-)phenol, catechol fragments. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2018, 32, e4121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wanke, R.; Benisvy, L.; Kuznetsov, M.L.; Guedes da Silva, M.F.C.; Pombeiro, A.J.L. Persistent Hydrogen-Bonded and Non-Hydrogen-Bonded Phenoxyl Radicals. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11882–11892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Neidlinger, A.; Ksenofontov, V.; Heinze, K. Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Ferrocenium–Phenolate Radicals. Organometallics 2013, 32, 5955–5965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Neidlinger, A.; Forster, C.; Heinze, K. How Hydrogen Bonds Affect Reactivity and Intervalence Charge Transfer in Ferrocenium-Phenolate Radicals. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 1274–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Druzhkov, N.O.; Egorova, E.N.; Arsenrev, M.V.; Baranov, E.V.; Cherkasov, V.K. Functionalization of sterically hindered catechol and o-benzoquinone with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2016, 65, 2855–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Egorova, E.N.; Druzhkov, N.O.; Kozhanov, K.A.; Cherkasov, A.V.; Cherkasov, V.K. Heterospin biradicals based on new piperidineoxyl-substituted 3,6-di-tert-butyl-o-benzoquinone. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2017, 66, 1629–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baryshnikova, S.V.; Bellan, E.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Arsenyev, M.V.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Piskunov, A.V.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Tin(IV) and antimony(V) complexes bearing catecholate ligand connected to ferrocene. Synthesis, molecular structure and electrochemical properties. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 5230–5241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Arsen’ev, M.V.; Okhlopkova, L.S.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Fukin, G.K. New Catecholate Complexes of Triphenylantimony(V) Based on 6-Iminomethyl-3,5-Di-tert-Butylpyrocatechols N-Functionalized by the Aniline or Phenol Group. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2017, 43, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Druzhkov, N.O.; Fukin, G.K.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Bifunctional iminopyridino-catechol and its o-quinone: Synthesis and investigation of coordination abilities. Polyhedron 2017, 124, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Klementieva, S.V.; Kuropatov, V.A.; Fukin, G.K.; Romanenko, G.V.; Bogomyakov, A.S.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Mono- and Binuclear Dimethylthallium(III) Complexes with o-Benzoquinone-TTF-o-Benzoquinone Ligand; Synthesis, Spectroscopy and X-ray Study. Z. Anorg. Allgem. Chem. 2011, 637, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Arsenyev, M.V.; Astaf’eva, T.V.; Chesnokov, S.A.; Fukin, G.K.; Abakumov, G.A. New sterically-hindered 6th-substituted 3,5-di-tert-butylcatechols/o-quinones with additional functional groups and their triphenylantimony(V) catecholates. J. Organometal. Chem. 2017, 835, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Arsenyev, M.V.; Astaf’eva, T.V.; Baranov, E.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Chesnokov, S.A. New sterically-hindered bis-catechol, bis-o-quinone and its bis-triphenylantimony(V) bis-catecholate. 3,5-Di-tert-butyl-6-methoxymethylcatechol as alkylating agent. Mendeleev Commun. 2018, 28, 76–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pointillart, F.; Klementieva, S.; Kuropatov, V.; Le Gal, Y.; Golhen, S.; Cador, O.; Cherkasov, V.; Ouahab, L. A single molecule magnet behaviour in a D3h symmetry Dy(III) complex involving a quinone–tetrathiafulvalene–quinone bridge. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 714–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kuropatov, V.; Klementieva, S.; Fukin, G.; Mitin, A.; Ketkov, S.; Budnikova, Y.; Cherkasov, V.; Abakumov, G. Novel method for the synthesis of functionalized tetrathiafulvalenes, an acceptor–donor–acceptor molecule comprising of two o-quinone moieties linked by a TTF bridge. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7605–7611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Klement’eva, S.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Baranov, E.V.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Investigation of photochemical transformations of tetrathiafulvalene-bridged di-o-quinone. High Energy Chem. 2011, 45, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kuropatov, V.A.; Klementieva, S.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. ESR study of paramagnetic derivatives of sterically hindered di-o-quinone with the tetrathiafulvalene bridge. Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed. 2010, 59, 1698–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A.; Fukin, G.K.; Klementyeva, S.V.; Kuropatov, V.A. Sterically Hindered o-Quinone Annulated with Dithiete: A Molecule Comprising Diolate and Dithiolate Coordination Sites. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 13821–13827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tesema, Y.T.; Pham, D.M.; Franz, K.J. Synthesis and Characterization of Copper(II) Complexes of Cysteinyldopa and Benzothiazine Model Ligands Related to Pheomelanin. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 6102–6104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tesema, Y.T.; Pham, D.M.; Franz, K.J. Counterions Influence Reactivity of Metal Ions with Cysteinyldopa Model Compounds. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 1087–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Poneti, G.; Poggini, L.; Mannini, M.; Cortigiani, B.; Sorace, L.; Otero, E.; Sainctavit, P.; Magnani, A.; Sessolia, R.; Dei, A. Thermal and optical control of electronic states in a single layer of switchable paramagnetic molecules. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 2268–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Smolyaninov, I.V.; Pitikova, O.V.; Rychagova, E.S.; Korchagina, E.O.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninova, S.A.; Berberova, N.T. Synthesis and antioxidant activity of sterically hindered bis-pyrocatechol thioethers. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2016, 65, 2861–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poneti, G.; Mannini, M.; Cortigiani, B.; Poggini, L.; Sorace, L.; Otero, E.; Sainctavit, P.; Sessoli, R.; Dei, A. Magnetic and Spectroscopic Investigation of Thermally and Optically Driven Valence Tautomerism in Thioether-Bridged Dinuclear Cobalt–Dioxolene Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 11798–11805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guardingo, M.; Bellido, E.; Miralles-Llumà, R.; Faraudo, J.; Sedó, J.; Tatay, S.; Verdaguer, A.; Busqué, F.; Ruiz-Molina, D. Bioinspired Catechol-Terminated Self-Assembled Monolayers with Enhanced Adhesion Properties. Small 2014, 10, 1594–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Mancebo-Aracil, J.; Casagualda, C.; Moreno-Villaécija, M.A.; Nador, F.; García-Pardo, J.; Franconetti-García, A.; Busqué, F.; Alibés, R.; Esplandiu, M.J.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; et al. Bioinspired Functional Catechol Derivatives Through Simple Thiol Conjugate Addition. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 12367–12379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Smolyaninov, I.; Pitikova, O.; Korchagina, E.; Poddel’sky, A.; Luzhnova, S.; Berberova, N. Electrochemical behavior and anti/prooxidant activity of thioethers with redox-active catechol moiety. Monatsh. Chem. 2018, 149, 1813–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Smolyaninov, I.V.; Pitikova, O.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Berberova, N.T. Electrochemical transformations and antiradical activity of asymmetrical RS-substituted pyrocatechols. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2018, 67, 1857–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Smolyaninov, I.V.; Pitikova, O.V.; Korchagina, E.O.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Fukin, G.K.; Luzhnova, S.A.; Tichkomirov, A.M.; Ponomareva, E.N.; Berberova, N.T. Bifunctional catechol thiothers with physiologically active fragments: Electrochemistry, antioxidant and cryoprotective activities. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 89, 103003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Loginova, N.V.; Koval’chuk, T.V.; Faletrov, Y.V.; Halauko, Y.S.; Osipovich, N.P.; Polozov, G.I.; Zheldakova, R.A.; Gres, A.T.; Halauko, A.S.; Azarko, I.I.; et al. Redox-active metal(II) complexes of sterically hindered phenolic ligands: Antibacterial activity and reduction of cytochrome c. Part II. Metal(II) complexes of o-diphenol derivatives of thioglycolic acid. Polyhedron 2011, 30, 2581–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Loginova, N.V.; Koval’chuk, T.V.; Polozov, G.I.; Osipovich, N.P.; Rytik, P.G.; Kucherov, I.I.; Chernyavskaya, A.A.; Sorokin, V.L.; Shadyro, O.I. Synthesis, characterization, antifungal and anti-HIV activities of metal(II) complexes of 4,6-di-tert-butyl-3-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]benzene-1,2-diol. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 1536–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Do Prado, B.R.; Islam, A.; Frezard, F.; Demicheli, C. Chapter 10. Organometallic Compounds in Chemotherapy Against Leishmania. In Drug Discovery for Leishmaniasis; Rivas, L., Gil, C., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2017; pp. 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hadjikakou, S.K.; Ozturk, I.I.; Banti, C.N.; Kourkoumelis, N.; Hadjiliadis, N. Recent advances on antimony(III/V) compounds with potential activity against tumor cells. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2015, 153, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Islam, A.; Rodrigues, B.L.; Marzan, I.M.; Perreira-Maia, E.C.; Dittz, D.; Lopes, M.T.P.; Ishfaq, M.; Frezard, F.; Demichel, C. Cytotoxicity and apoptotic activity of novel organobismuth(V) and organoantimony(V) complexes in different cancer cell lines. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 109, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Christianson, A.M.; Gabbaï, F.P. Antimony-and Bismuth-Based Materials and Applications. In Main Group Strategies Towards Functional Hybrid Materials; Baumgartner, T., Jäkle, F., Eds.; John Wiley& Sons: Chichester, UK, 2018; pp. 405–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hirai, M.; Gabbai, F.P. Squeezing fluoride out of water with a neutral bidentate antimony (V) Lewis acid . Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hirai, M.; Gabbaï, F.P. Lewis acidic stiborafluorenes for the fluorescence turn-on sensing of fluoride in drinking water at ppm concentrations. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Chen, C.-H.; Gabbai, F.P. Fluoride Anion Complexation by a Triptycene-Based Distiborane: Taking Advantage of a Weak but Observable C−H⋅⋅⋅F Interaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1799–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Arsenyev, M.V.; Shurygina, M.P.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Druzhkov, N.O.; Chesnokov, S.A.; Fukin, G.K.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. New poly-o-quinone-methacrylate and its dioxygen-active antimony-containing polymer. J. Polym. Res. 2013, 20, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lenshina, N.A.; Shurygina, M.P.; Arsenyev, M.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Zaitsev, S.D.; Chesnokov, S.A.; Abakumov, G.A. Optically controlled distribution of o-quinonemethacrylate metal complexes in polymer material. J. Coord. Chem. 2015, 68, 4159–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chesnokov, S.A.; Lenshina, N.A.; Arsenyev, M.V.; Kovylin, R.S.; Baten’kin, M.A.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Abakumov, G.A. Preparation of new dioxygen-active triphenylantimony(V) catecholate-containing porous polymer. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2017, 31, e3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lide, D.R. (Ed.) CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 86th ed.; CRC Press:   Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; 2544p. [Google Scholar]
  64. Batsanov, S.S. The atomic radii of the elements. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 36, 1694–1706. [Google Scholar]
  65. Brown, S.N. Metrical Oxidation States of 2-Amidophenoxide and Catecholate Ligands: Structural Signatures of Metal–Ligand π Bonding in Potentially Noninnocent Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 1251–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gai, K.; Fang, X.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Wu, X.; Lin, A.; Yao, H. Synthesis of spiro[2.5]octa-4,7-dien-6-one with consecutive quaternary centers via 1,6-conjugate addition induced dearomatization of para-quinone methides. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 15831–15834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Jarava-Barrera, C.; Parra, A.; Lopez, A.; Cruz-Acosta, F.; Collado-Sanz, D.; Cardenas, D.J.; Tortosa, M. Copper-Catalyzed Borylative Aromatization of p-Quinone Methides: Enantioselective Synthesis of Dibenzylic Boronates. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Santra, S.; Porey, A.; Jana, B.; Guin, J. N-Heterocyclic carbenes as chiral Brønsted base catalysts: A highly diastereo- and enantioselective 1,6-addition reaction. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 6446–6450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Hall, M.; Sowerby, D.B. Synthesis and crystal structure of bis(triphenylantimony catecholate) hydrate. A new square-pyramidal antimony(V) compound. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Holmes, R.R.; Day, R.O.; Chandrasekhar, V.; Holmes, J.M. Pentacoordinated molecules. 67. Formation and structure of cyclic five-coordinated antimony derivatives. The first square-pyramidal geometry for a bicyclic stiborane. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tian, Z.; Tuck, D.G. Oxidation of elemental antimony by substituted ortho-benzoquinones. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1993, 1381–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gibbons, M.N.; Begley, M.J.; Blake, A.J.; Sowerby, D.B. New square-pyramidal organoantimony(V) compounds; crystal structures of (biphenyl-2,2′-diyl)phenylantimony(V) dibromide, dichloride and diisothiocyanate, Sb(2,2′-C12H8)PhX2 (X = Br, Cl or NCS), and of octahedral SbPh(o-O2C6Cl4)Cl2·OEt2. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1997, 2419–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Piskunov, A.V.; Druzhkov, N.O.; Fukin, G.K.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. New bis-o-benzoquinoid ligands with ethylene bridge and their metal complexes. Synthesis, Spectroscopy and X-ray study. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2009, 635, 2563–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Somov, N.V.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Antimony(V) catecholato complexes based on 5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalenequinone-2,3. Crystal structure of [Ph4Sb]+[Ph2Sb(Cat)2]−. J. Organometal. Chem. 2010, 695, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Somov, N.V.; Druzhkov, N.O.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. The binuclear trimethyl/triethylantimony(V) bis-catecholate derivatives of four-electron reduced 4,4’-di-(3-methyl-6-tert-butyl-o-benzoquinone). J. Organometal. Chem. 2011, 696, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fukin, G.K.; Baranov, E.V.; Jelsch, C.; Guillot, B.; Poddelskii, A.I.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Topological and Energetic Characteristics of Sb Complexes Reversibly Binding Molecular Oxygen. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 8271–8281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Baranov, E.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. The nitro-substituted catecholates of triphenylantimony(V): Tetragonal-pyramidal vs. trigonal-bipyramidal coordination. J. Organometal. Chem. 2013, 733, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Arsen’ev, M.V.; Okhlopkova, L.S.; Poddel’skii, A.I.; Fukin, G.K. Binuclear Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholate Based on Redox-Active Bis-o-Benzoquinone, a Bis-Catechol-Aldimine Derivative. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2018, 44, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Okhlopkova, L.S.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholato Complexes with 4-(2,6-Dimethylphenyliminomethyl)pyridine. Structure, Redox Properties: The Influence of Pyridine Ligand. J. Organometal. Chem. 2019, 897, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Regan, C.J.; Walton, D.P.; Shafaat, O.S.; Dougherty, D.A. Mechanistic Studies of the Photoinduced Quinone Trimethyl Lock Decaging Process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4729–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Berger, S.; Hertl, P.; Rieker, A. Physical and chemical analysis of quinones. In The Quinonoid Compounds; Patai, S., Rappoport, Z., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 29–78. [Google Scholar]
  82. Amorati, R.; Fumo, M.G.; Menichetti, S.; Munnanini, V.; Pedulli, G.F. Electronic and Hydrogen Bonding Effects on the Chain-Breaking Activity of Sulfur-Containing Phenolic Antioxidants. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6325–6332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Smolyaninov, I.V.; Poddel’skiy, A.I.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Electrochemical transformations of catecholate and o-amidophenolate complexes with triphenylantimony(V). Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2010, 36, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Smolyaninov, I.V.; Antonova, N.A.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninova, S.A.; Osipova, V.P.; Berberova, N.T. Radical scavenging activity of sterically hindered catecholate and o-amidophenolate complexes of LSbVPh3 type. J. Organometal. Chem. 2011, 696, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V. 3,6-Di-tert-butylcatecholates of triaryl antimony(V): NMR study and redox-transformations. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2010, 80, 538–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Poddel’skii, A.I.; Ilyakina, E.V.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Complexes of triphenylantimony(V) catecholates with ammonium salts. Spectroscopic and electrochemical investigations. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2014, 63, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Kurskii, Yu.A.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. New dioxygen-inert triphenylantimony(V) catecholate complexes based on o-quinones with electron-withdrawing groups. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2009, 58, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Astaf’eva, T.V.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Arsenyev, M.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Triphenylantimony(V) 6-alkoxymethyl-3,5-di-tert-butylcatecholates. Structure and redox-properties. J. Organometal. Chem. 2018, 873, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. 3,6-Di-tert-butylcatecholates of trialkyl/triarylantimony(V). J. Organometal. Chem. 2018, 867, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Berberova, N.T.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Triarylantimony(V) catecholates—derivatives of 4,5-difluoro-3,6- di-tert-butyl-o-benzoquinone. J. Organometal. Chem. 2016, 824, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninov, I.V.; Berberova, N.T.; Fukin, G.K.; Cherkasov, V.K.; Abakumov, G.A. Triaryl/trialkylantimony(V) catecholates with electron-acceptor groups. J. Organometal. Chem. 2015, 789, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. The Potential Value for 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol: 1.48 V vs. Ag/AgCl (GC-electrode, CH2Cl2). measured in this study.
  93. Emsley, J. The Elements; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  94. Easyspin 5.2.25. Available online: http://www.easyspin.org/ (accessed on 1 July 2019).
  95. Perrin, D.D.; Armarego, W.L.F.; Perrin, D.R. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  96. Bruker; SAINT. Data Reduction and Correction Program v.8.27B; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  97. Bruker; SADABS. Bruker/Siemens Area Detector Absorption Correction Program, v.2014/2; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  98. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXTL. Structure Determination Software Suite, v.6.14; Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules 25 01770 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of catechols L1–L3.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of catechols L1–L3.
Molecules 25 01770 sch001
Molecules 25 01770 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of complexes 1 and 2.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of complexes 1 and 2.
Molecules 25 01770 sch002
Molecules 25 01770 g001 550
Figure 1. The X-ray structure of catechol L1 (6-(CH2-S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 in crystal. The hydrogen atoms except hydroxyl hydrogens are omitted for clarity. The ellipsoids of 50% probability. The selected bond distances (Å): O(1)-C(1) 1.3816(14), O(2)-C(2) 1.3804(14), O(3)-C(11) 1.3806(14), S(1)-C(7) 1.8527(12), S(1)-C(8) 1.7765(11), C(1)-C(2) 1.3967(16), C(1)-C(6) 1.3987(16), C(2)-C(3) 1.3910(16), C(3)-C(4) 1.4029(15), C(4)-C(5) 1.4016(15), C(5)-C(6) 1.4150(15), C(6)-C(7) 1.5101(15), C(8)-C(9) 1.3907(16), C(8)-C(13) 1.3893(16), C(9)-C(10) 1.3947(16), C(10)-C(11) 1.4118(15), C(11)-C(12) 1.4139(15), C(12)-C(13) 1.3949(16).
Figure 1. The X-ray structure of catechol L1 (6-(CH2-S-tBu2Phenol)-3,5-DBCat)H2 in crystal. The hydrogen atoms except hydroxyl hydrogens are omitted for clarity. The ellipsoids of 50% probability. The selected bond distances (Å): O(1)-C(1) 1.3816(14), O(2)-C(2) 1.3804(14), O(3)-C(11) 1.3806(14), S(1)-C(7) 1.8527(12), S(1)-C(8) 1.7765(11), C(1)-C(2) 1.3967(16), C(1)-C(6) 1.3987(16), C(2)-C(3) 1.3910(16), C(3)-C(4) 1.4029(15), C(4)-C(5) 1.4016(15), C(5)-C(6) 1.4150(15), C(6)-C(7) 1.5101(15), C(8)-C(9) 1.3907(16), C(8)-C(13) 1.3893(16), C(9)-C(10) 1.3947(16), C(10)-C(11) 1.4118(15), C(11)-C(12) 1.4139(15), C(12)-C(13) 1.3949(16).
Molecules 25 01770 g001
Molecules 25 01770 g002 550
Figure 2. The X-ray structure of 1: (a) the general view on molecule of 1; (b) the view on molecule 1 along the dotted line (view b) depicted on Figure 2a. The hydrogen atoms except hydroxyl hydrogen H(1) are omitted for clarity. The ellipsoids of 50% probability. The selected bond distances (Å): Sb(1)-O(1) 2.0402(13), Sb(1)-O(2) 2.0256(13), Sb(1)-C(30) 2.1328(19), Sb(1)-C(36) 2.1383(19), Sb(1)-C(42) 2.1054(19), O(1)-C(1) 1.358(2), O(2)-C(2) 1.366(2), O(3)-C(19) 1.376(2), O(3)-H(1) 0.73(3), S(1)-C(7) 1.8365(18), S(1)-C(16) 1.7772(19), C(1)-C(2) 1.398(3), C(1)-C(6) 1.393(3), C(2)-C(3) 1.392(3), C(3)-C(4) 1.415(3), C(4)-C(5) 1.400(3), C(5)-C(6) 1.401(3), C(16)-C(17) 1.385(3), C(16)-C(21) 1.389(3), C(17)-C(18) 1.394(3), C(18)-C(19) 1.413(3), C(19)-C(20) 1.408(3), C(20)-C(21) 1.390(3).
Figure 2. The X-ray structure of 1: (a) the general view on molecule of 1; (b) the view on molecule 1 along the dotted line (view b) depicted on Figure 2a. The hydrogen atoms except hydroxyl hydrogen H(1) are omitted for clarity. The ellipsoids of 50% probability. The selected bond distances (Å): Sb(1)-O(1) 2.0402(13), Sb(1)-O(2) 2.0256(13), Sb(1)-C(30) 2.1328(19), Sb(1)-C(36) 2.1383(19), Sb(1)-C(42) 2.1054(19), O(1)-C(1) 1.358(2), O(2)-C(2) 1.366(2), O(3)-C(19) 1.376(2), O(3)-H(1) 0.73(3), S(1)-C(7) 1.8365(18), S(1)-C(16) 1.7772(19), C(1)-C(2) 1.398(3), C(1)-C(6) 1.393(3), C(2)-C(3) 1.392(3), C(3)-C(4) 1.415(3), C(4)-C(5) 1.400(3), C(5)-C(6) 1.401(3), C(16)-C(17) 1.385(3), C(16)-C(21) 1.389(3), C(17)-C(18) 1.394(3), C(18)-C(19) 1.413(3), C(19)-C(20) 1.408(3), C(20)-C(21) 1.390(3).
Molecules 25 01770 g002
Molecules 25 01770 g003 550
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms of compound L1 (in the potential switch from −0.70 to 1.5 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.70 to 1.85 V—curve 2) (MeCN, C = 3 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms of compound L1 (in the potential switch from −0.70 to 1.5 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.70 to 1.85 V—curve 2) (MeCN, C = 3 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Molecules 25 01770 g003
Molecules 25 01770 sch003 550
Scheme 3. The first stage of electrochemical oxidation of L1.
Scheme 3. The first stage of electrochemical oxidation of L1.
Molecules 25 01770 sch003
Molecules 25 01770 g004 550
Figure 4. The changes in the absorption spectrum of thioether L1 during the electrolysis time (90 min) at a controlled potential 1.2 V (MeCN, Ar, C = 0.5 mM, 0.15 M TBAP).
Figure 4. The changes in the absorption spectrum of thioether L1 during the electrolysis time (90 min) at a controlled potential 1.2 V (MeCN, Ar, C = 0.5 mM, 0.15 M TBAP).
Molecules 25 01770 g004
Molecules 25 01770 g005 550
Figure 5. The CV curves of L2 (in the potential switch from −0.60 to 1.50 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.60 to 1.70 V—curve 2; in the potential switch from −0.60 to 1.85 V—curve 3) (CH2Cl2, C = 1.5 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Figure 5. The CV curves of L2 (in the potential switch from −0.60 to 1.50 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.60 to 1.70 V—curve 2; in the potential switch from −0.60 to 1.85 V—curve 3) (CH2Cl2, C = 1.5 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Molecules 25 01770 g005
Molecules 25 01770 sch004 550
Scheme 4. The electrochemical oxidation of L2.
Scheme 4. The electrochemical oxidation of L2.
Molecules 25 01770 sch004
Molecules 25 01770 sch005 550
Scheme 5. The electrochemical oxidation of complex 1.
Scheme 5. The electrochemical oxidation of complex 1.
Molecules 25 01770 sch005
Molecules 25 01770 g006 550
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of compound 1 (in the potential switch from −0.5 to 1.1 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.5 to 1.6 V—curve 2) (CH2Cl2, C = 3 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammograms of compound 1 (in the potential switch from −0.5 to 1.1 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.5 to 1.6 V—curve 2) (CH2Cl2, C = 3 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Molecules 25 01770 g006
Molecules 25 01770 sch006 550
Scheme 6. The electrochemical oxidation of complex 2.
Scheme 6. The electrochemical oxidation of complex 2.
Molecules 25 01770 sch006
Molecules 25 01770 g007 550
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammograms of compound 2 (in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.15 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.30 V—curve 2; in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.70 V—curve 3) (CH2Cl2, C = 3 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammograms of compound 2 (in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.15 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.30 V—curve 2; in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.70 V—curve 3) (CH2Cl2, C = 3 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Molecules 25 01770 g007
Molecules 25 01770 sch007 550
Scheme 7. The electrochemical oxidation of complex 1 in acetonitrile.
Scheme 7. The electrochemical oxidation of complex 1 in acetonitrile.
Molecules 25 01770 sch007
Molecules 25 01770 g008 550
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms of compound 2 (in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.05 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.50 V—curve 2) (CH3CN, C = 4 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Figure 8. Cyclic voltammograms of compound 2 (in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.05 V—curve 1; in the potential switch from −0.50 to 1.50 V—curve 2) (CH3CN, C = 4 mM, 0.15 M TBAP, scan rate 200 mV∙s−1).
Molecules 25 01770 g008
Molecules 25 01770 sch008 550
Scheme 8. The oxidation of catechol L1 with lead(IV) oxide.
Scheme 8. The oxidation of catechol L1 with lead(IV) oxide.
Molecules 25 01770 sch008
Molecules 25 01770 g009 550
Figure 9. The X-band EPR spectrum of the mixture “L2 + PbO2” in toluene immediately after mixing the reagents (spectrum 1), after stirring for 10 min (spectrum 2), and after stirring for 20 min (spectrum 3); Simulated EPR spectra (WinEPR SimFonia 1.25): triplet with parameters gi = 2.0050, ai(21H) = 1.1 G (spectrum 4), doublet with parameters gi = 1.9967, ai(1H) = 2.3 G (spectrum 5).
Figure 9. The X-band EPR spectrum of the mixture “L2 + PbO2” in toluene immediately after mixing the reagents (spectrum 1), after stirring for 10 min (spectrum 2), and after stirring for 20 min (spectrum 3); Simulated EPR spectra (WinEPR SimFonia 1.25): triplet with parameters gi = 2.0050, ai(21H) = 1.1 G (spectrum 4), doublet with parameters gi = 1.9967, ai(1H) = 2.3 G (spectrum 5).
Molecules 25 01770 g009
Molecules 25 01770 sch009 550
Scheme 9. The oxidation of L2 with lead(IV) oxide.
Scheme 9. The oxidation of L2 with lead(IV) oxide.
Molecules 25 01770 sch009
Molecules 25 01770 sch010 550
Scheme 10. The oxidation of complex 1 with PbO2 with formation of the phenoxyl radical.
Scheme 10. The oxidation of complex 1 with PbO2 with formation of the phenoxyl radical.
Molecules 25 01770 sch010
Molecules 25 01770 g010 550
Figure 10. The X-band EPR spectrum of a mixture ”1+PbO2”: exp.—the experimental spectrum (toluene, 298 K); sim.—its simulation (WinEPR SimFonia 1.25).
Figure 10. The X-band EPR spectrum of a mixture ”1+PbO2”: exp.—the experimental spectrum (toluene, 298 K); sim.—its simulation (WinEPR SimFonia 1.25).
Molecules 25 01770 g010
Table
Table 1. The CV data for thioethers L1–L3 and triphenylantimony(V) catecholates 1 and 2 in CH2Cl2 (GC anode, C = 3·10−3 M, Ar, 0.15 M Bu4NClO4, vs. Ag/AgCl/KCl(sat.)).
Table 1. The CV data for thioethers L1–L3 and triphenylantimony(V) catecholates 1 and 2 in CH2Cl2 (GC anode, C = 3·10−3 M, Ar, 0.15 M Bu4NClO4, vs. Ag/AgCl/KCl(sat.)).
CompoundEox1, V 1Ic/IaEox2, V 1Ic/IaEox3, V
L11.28-1.49--
L21.37
(1.32)		0.41.58
(1.55)		0.61.77
L31.28 -1.48--
10.96
(0.89)		0.81.39
(1.27)		0.5-
21.04
(0.96)		0.71.24-1.48
1 The half-wave potentials E1/2 for quasi-reversible oxidation processes are given in parentheses.
Table
Table 2. The CV data for thioethers L1–L3 and triphenylantimony(V) catecholates 1 and 2 in CH3CN (GC anode, C = 3·10−3 M, Ar, 0.15 M Bu4NClO4, vs. Ag/AgCl/KCl(sat.)).
Table 2. The CV data for thioethers L1–L3 and triphenylantimony(V) catecholates 1 and 2 in CH3CN (GC anode, C = 3·10−3 M, Ar, 0.15 M Bu4NClO4, vs. Ag/AgCl/KCl(sat.)).
CompoundEox1, V 1Ic/IaEox2, V 1Ic/IaEox3, V
L11.09-1.34-1.69
L2 *1.27-1.480.3-
L3 **1.13-1.26-1.61
10.89
(0.84)		0.41.23
(1.12)		0.51.68
20.94
(0.89)		0.81.36--
1 The half-wave potentials E1/2 for quasi-reversible oxidation processes are given in parentheses. * Data have been received in a mixture “CH3CN/ CH2Cl2” (2:1). ** Data from ref. [48].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smolyaninov, I.V.; Poddel’sky, A.I.; Smolyaninova, S.A.; Arsenyev, M.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Berberova, N.T. Polyfunctional Sterically Hindered Catechols with Additional Phenolic Group and Their Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholates: Synthesis, Structure, and Redox Properties. Molecules 2020, 25, 1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081770

AMA Style

Smolyaninov IV, Poddel’sky AI, Smolyaninova SA, Arsenyev MV, Fukin GK, Berberova NT. Polyfunctional Sterically Hindered Catechols with Additional Phenolic Group and Their Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholates: Synthesis, Structure, and Redox Properties. Molecules. 2020; 25(8):1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smolyaninov, Ivan V., Andrey I. Poddel’sky, Susanna A. Smolyaninova, Maxim V. Arsenyev, Georgy K. Fukin, and Nadezhda T. Berberova. 2020. "Polyfunctional Sterically Hindered Catechols with Additional Phenolic Group and Their Triphenylantimony(V) Catecholates: Synthesis, Structure, and Redox Properties" Molecules 25, no. 8: 1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081770

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop