Next Article in Journal
Protective Effects of Gintonin on Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced HT22 Cell Damages: Involvement of LPA1 Receptor-BDNF-AKT Signaling Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
Dihydroisocoumarins and Dihydroisoflavones from the Rhizomes of Dioscorea collettii with Cytotoxic Activity and Structural Revision of 2,2′-Oxybis(1,4-di-tert-butylbenzene)
Previous Article in Journal
Statistical Analysis of Polymer Nanocomposites for Mechanical Properties
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conifers Phytochemicals: A Valuable Forest with Therapeutic Potential
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 14
10.3390/molecules26144137
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clitorienolactones and Isoflavonoids of Clitorea ternatea Roots Alleviate Stress-Like Symptoms in a Reserpine-Induced Zebrafish Model

by
Muhammad Afiq Ngadni
1,
Muhammad Tayyab Akhtar
1,2,
Intan Safinar Ismail
1,
Anis Irfan Norazhar
1,
Soo Yee Lee
1,
Maulidiani Maulidiani
1,3 and
Khozirah Shaari
1,*
1
Natural Medicines and Products Research Laboratory (NaturMeds), Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
2
Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College University, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3
School of Fundamental Science, University Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Kuala Nerus 21030, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(14), 4137; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144137
Submission received: 8 May 2021 / Revised: 26 May 2021 / Accepted: 29 May 2021 / Published: 7 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Compounds from Roots, Stems, Leaves, Flowers, Fruits, and Seeds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Clitorea ternatea has been used in Ayurvedic medicine as a brain stimulant to treat mental illnesses and mental functional disorders. In this study, the metabolite profiles of crude C. ternatea root extract (CTRE), ethyl acetate (EA), and 50% aqueous methanol (50% MeOH) fractions were investigated using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detector–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS), while their effect on the stress-like behavior of zebrafish, pharmacologically induced with reserpine, was investigated. A total of 32 compounds were putatively identified, among which, a series of norneolignans, clitorienolactones, and various flavonoids (flavone, flavonol, isoflavone, and isoflavanone) was found to comprise the major constituents, particularly in the EA and 50% MeOH fractions. The clitorienolactones, presently unique to the species, were present in both the free and glycosylated forms in the roots. Both the EA and 50% MeOH fractions displayed moderate effects on the stress-induced zebrafish model, significantly decreasing freezing duration and elevating the total distance travelled and average velocity, 72 h post-treatment. The results of the present study provide further evidence that the basis for the use of C. ternatea roots in traditional medicine to alleviate brain-related conditions, such as stress and depression, is attributable to the presence of clitorienolactones and the isoflavonoidal constituents.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Recent statistics released by the World Health Organization (WHO) have revealed that more than 264 people globally have been diagnosed with some form of mental disorder, including depression [1]. Gender-wise, women report higher prevalence rates than men, and children and adolescents aged 15 and below are also affected, albeit at lower rates compared to adults. People suffering from depression experience varying clinical symptoms, such as loss of bodyweight, sleep disturbances, and feelings of indecisiveness, guilt, and irritability, as well as intense fatigue [2,3]. Left untreated, such conditions have also been reported to worsen, even leading to suicidal thoughts. The fact that the causes of mental illness are derived from a multitude of factors, such as physiological, biological, and external environment, further exacerbates the situation, making early diagnosis a challenging process [4]. It is now commonly accepted that chronic stress is closely linked to the development of depressive symptoms, along with pathophysiological alteration in both brain structure and brain function [5,6]. Stress-induced depression has thus become one of the neurological states modelled in animal models, such as rodents, mice, and zebrafish, as a means to better understand the condition [7,8].
Present treatments for mental health problems include the use of antidepressant drugs. However, despite their efficacy, synthetic drugs such as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are associated with numerous side effects, such as sleepiness, weight gain, gastrointestinal issues, and sexual dysfunction [9,10]. Hence, an increasing amount of research has been conducted on plant-based remedies as alternative treatments for alleviating stress and depression. Moreover, because of their decent tolerability, low toxicity, and safety, public interest in these alternative medicines has risen over the past 20 years, both in the United States and globally [11].
Clitorea ternatea, commonly known as “butterfly pea” or “Asian pigeon wings”, is a plant that belongs to the Leguminosae family, under the subfamily Papilionoideae [12,13,14]. In Ayurvedic medicine, the leaves and roots of the plant are used to treat body pains, infections, animal stings, fever, and constipation [15]. The plant has also been traditionally used as a tonic for the brain called “Medhya Rasayana”, and functions as a medicine for neurological disorders [16]. The aerial parts of the plant have been reported to exert mild central nervous system (CNS) activity, such as nootropic, anxiolytic, antistress, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant activity [14]. Meanwhile, the roots have been reported to possess pharmacological benefits, such as antidepressant [17], antipyretic [18], anti-inflammatory, and analgesic effects [19]. In addition, C. ternatea roots have also been shown to enhance the acetylcholine content of rat brains—in particular, the hippocampus region [20]. This unique property could be responsible for its antiamnesic and memory and learning improvement effects on the rodents [21,22]. Previous studies on the chemical profile of C. ternatea roots reported the presence of various classes of compounds, including amino acids—comprising glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, arginine, and histidine—triterpenoids—specifically taraxerol and taraxerone—the norneolignans—clitorienolactones A, B, C, and D,—aldehyde—(Z)-9,17-octadecadienal, and—a fatty acid—palmitic acid [22,23,24,25]. Furthermore, most of these compounds have exhibited promising psychoactive properties. The norneolignans displayed learning and memory enhancement potential [22], taraxerol displayed significant inhibition on acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity [26], and the last two compounds, (Z)-9,17-octadecadienal and palmitic acid, showed promising monoamine oxidase inhibitory action from molecular docking studies [16]. However, despite these early studies, there remains much to be understood about the chemistry and pharmacology of this medicinal plant, particularly in relation to its therapeutic potential for treating brain-related disorders, such as stress and depression.
In the last few decades, zebrafish (Danio rerio) have emerged as a powerful model for neuroscience research, since their physiology strongly parallels both rodents and humans [27,28]. Moreover, zebrafish possess all of the classical neurotransmitters found in vertebrates, suggesting their potential for studying neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, and mental illnesses such as anxiety and depression. Additionally, zebrafish have a robust and sensitive behavioral response, which could be used as parameters to study neurological effects, such as stress and depression [29]. As part of a continuous search for new pharmacologically active compounds of plant origin, and following the lead provided by its ethnomedicinal use for treating neurological disorders, we embarked on the present study to obtain insights into the biological effects of C. ternatea root extract and the chemical constituents responsible for them. The neurological effects of the root extract were tested on zebrafish, which were pharmacologically induced into a stress-like state using reserpine, a drug widely used to mediate depression in experimental animal models. Meanwhile, the chemical constituents of the root extract and its bioactive fractions were profiled via UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS analysis in order to gain insights into the potential active constituents.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS Profiling of C. ternatea Crude Root Extract in Negative Ionization Mode

Peak assignments and the metabolites putatively identified in C. ternatea root extract based on the LC–MS/MS data obtained in the negative mode (ESI−) are displayed in Figure 1 and Table 1, respectively. The base peak chromatogram (Figure 1) showed that most of the compounds were eluted between the 5th and 11th minutes. A total of 32 compounds were identified, as listed according to their different classes in Table 1. The metabolites were characterized based on comparing their fragmentation patterns to those reported in literature and natural products databases.

2.1.1. Clitorienolactones

The clitorienolactones were detected in the root extracts in both free and glycosylated forms. The free aglycones were detected at m/z 297.0754, 327.0858, 311.091, and 341.1013, which were the deprotonated molecular ions for peaks 17, 18, 23, and 24, respectively. The compounds were characterized as clitorienolactones D, C, B, and A, based on comparison with reported MS data [22]. The fragmentation patterns of these compounds are illustrated in detail in Figure 2, showing characteristic losses of CO2 (−44 amu) from the lactone ring and carbon cleavage at C7–C8. Such a fragmentation pathway is not uncommon, as it has been reported in mass fragmentation dibenzylbutyrolactone lignans [39]. In addition, losses of CH3 (−15 amu) were also detected where the methyl group was cleaved via radical fragmentation. Moreover, the UV spectra of these clitorienolactones matched those reported in previous reports, as shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S1.
Peaks 11, 12, 13, and 14, with deprotonated molecular ions at m/z 459.1278, 489.1383, 503.1537, and 473.1429, respectively, were assigned as the O-hexosides of the clitorienolactones, identified as clitorienolactone D-O-hexoside, clitorienolactone C-O-hexoside, clitorienolactone A-O-hexoside, and clitorienolactone B-O-hexoside, respectively. The presence of Y0− ([M-H-C6H9O5]−) ions in their MS/MS spectra corresponded to the loss of a single hexose unit. Meanwhile, peaks 5, 6, 7, and 8, with deprotonated molecular ions at m/z 621.1796, 651.1931, 635.1950, and 665.2057, respectively, exhibited typical fragmentation of O-dihexosides via losses of 162 amu. They were identified as clitorienolactone D-O-dihexoside, clitorienolactone C-O-dihexoside, clitorienolactone B-O-dihexoside, and clitorienolactone A-O-dihexoside, respectively. The formation of Y1− ([M-H-C6H9O5]−) and Y0− ([M-H-C6H9O5-C6H9O5]−) ions in their MS/MS fragmentation (Table 1) was due to the loss of the terminal sugar (hexoside) units and rearrangement reactions of the interglycosidic bonds [40,41].

2.1.2. Flavonoids

Several classes of flavonoids were identified in the root extract, comprising isoflavones (peaks 19, 21, 25, and 29), a flavonol (20), flavones (22, 26, and 27), an isoflavanol (28), and isoflavanons (30, 31, and 32). Identification of the four isoflavones was based on their characteristic fragmentation patterns resulting from retro-Diels–Alder (RDA) reactions and successive losses of CO molecules. The identified isoflavones were: daidzein (peak 19), with a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 253.0493, and fragment ions at m/z 224 ([M-H-CO-H]•−), 196 ([M-H-CHO-CO]•−), 135 (1,3A−), 133 (0,3B−), and 117 (1,3B−); glycitein (peak 21), with a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 283.0598, and fragment ions at m/z 268 ([M-H-CH3]•−), 240 [M-H-CH3-CO]•−), 239 [M-H-CH3-CO-H]−), 212 [M-H-CH3-CO-CO]•−)s and 211 [M-H-CH3-CO-H-CO]−); genistein (peak 25), with a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 269.0444, and fragment ions at m/z 241 ([M-H-CO]−), 213 ([M-H-CO-CO]−), 135 (0,3A−)s and 133 (0,3B−); and, lastly, formononetin (peak 29), with a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 267.0651), and fragment ions at m/z 252 ([M-H-CH3]•−), 224 ([M-H-CH3-CO]•−), 195 ([M-H-CH3-CO-H-CO]−), 135 (1,3A−), and 132 (0,3B−). Not only are these fragmentation patterns and their peak assignments in accordance with previous findings [33,38], the order of elution of these isoflavones also tallies with those of published reports [42,43]. Comparison with the standards also confirmed the identification of peaks 19, 25, and 29 as daidzein, genistein, and formononetin, respectively, as shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S2. Peak 21 was initially assumed to be biochanin A; however, the dissimilarity in retention time disapproved this assumption, thus strengthening its identification as glycitein, an isomer of biochanin A.
Peak 20, with a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 297.0753, was identified as 3′,4′-dimethoxyflavonol, based on the accompanying fragment ions at m/z 282 ([M-H-CH3]−), 267 ([M-H-CH3-CH3]−), 254 ([M-H-CH3-CO]−), and 239 ([M-H-CH3-CO-CH3]−), all of which were consistent with data from the online database [30]. One of the three flavones detected was identified as diosmetin (peak 22), with a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 299.0546, and fragment ions at m/z 284 ([M-H-CH3]−), 271 ([M-H-CO]−), and 256 ([M-H-CO-CH3]−). The luteolin derivative, luteolin-3′,4′-dimethyl ether, was assigned to peak 26, and displayed a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 313.0704, and fragment ions at m/z 298 ([M-H-CH3]−), 283 ([M-H-CH3-CH3]−), 270 ([M-H-CH3-CO]•−), 255 ([M-H-CH3-CO-CH3]−), and 239 ([M-H-CH3-CO-OCH3]−). The third flavone, hoslundal, was assigned to peak 27, with a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 309.0752), and fragment ions at m/z 294 ([M-H-CH3]−), 266 ([M-H-C2H3O]−), 222 ([M-H-C2H3O-CO2]−), 249 ([M-H-CH3-CO2H]−), 148 ([0,3A-CH2CO]−), and 132 ([0,4A-CH2O]−). These identifications consistent with data from the online database and previous literature reports [30,44]. The proposed fragmentation pathways of compounds 20, 22, 26, and 27 are illustrated in Supplementary Materials Figures S3–S6.
Peaks 30 and 32, which exhibited similar molecular ions at m/z 353.1013 and similar fragmentation patterns, were identified as ambonone and its isomer. Their fragment ions appeared at m/z 338 ([M-H-CH3]−), 323 ([M-H-CH3-CH3]−), 308 ([M-H-CH3-CH3-CH3]•−), 293 ([M-H-CH3-CH3-CHO]−), and 279 ([M-H-CH3-CH3-CH3-CHO]−). Lastly, peak 31 was identified as neoraunone, an isoflavanone with a similar structure to ambonone, but with only 2 methoxy groups attached to the B-ring; it displayed a deprotonated molecular ion at m/z 323.0911, and fragment ions at m/z 308 ([M-H-CH3]−), 293 ([M-H-CH3-CH3]−), 265 ([M-H-CH3-CH3-CO]−), 249 ([M-H-CH3-CH3-CO2]−), 237 ([M-H-CH3-CH3-CO-CO]−), and 221 ([M-H-CH3-CH3-CO2-CO]−). The proposed fragmentation pathways for ambonone isomers and neoraunone are illustrated in Supplementary Materials Figures S7 and S8, respectively.
Three isoflavonoid glycosides were identified: genistin, daidzin, and glycitin (peaks 9, 10, and 16, respectively), with molecular ions at m/z 431.0963, 415.1016, and 445.1124, respectively. The MS/MS spectra showed that the formation of [Y0–H]−• ions in compounds 9 and 10 (m/z 268 and 252) was at relatively higher abundance compared to their respective Y0− ions (m/z 269 and 253) (Table 1). This fragmentation behavior, and the formation of these ions, which were formed through a loss of glucose + H (−163 amu) and glucose (−162 amu) moiety respectively, are in agreement with those of genistin and daidzin [41]. Meanwhile, the MS/MS spectra of compound 16 displayed a base peak at m/z 283 (Y0− ion) for loss of glucose (−162 amu) from the parent ion, and characteristic fragment ions of the aglycone unit, such as m/z 240 [M-H-CH3-CO]•−), 239 [M-H-CH3-CO-H]−), and 133 (0,3B−), all of which suggested it to be glycitin [37,38].

2.1.3. Identification of Amino Acids and Carboxylic Acids

Peaks 1, 2, 3, and 4, showing molecular ions at m/z 154.0605, 173.1027, 131.0445, and 203.0811, respectively, were identified as amino acids. Peak 1, with fragment ions at m/z 137 ([M-H-NH2]−) and 110 ([M-H-CO2]−), was identified as histidine, while peak 2, with a single fragment ion at m/z 131 ([M-H-CH3N2]−), was identified as arginine. Peak 3, with fragment ions appearing at m/z 114 ([M-H-NH3]−), 113 ([M-H-H2O]−), 72 ([M-2H-C2H3NO]−, 70 ([M-2H-CHNO2]−), and 58 (M-H-C2H¬2NO2]−), was attributed to asparagine. Peak 4 was identified as tryptophan (m/z 203.0811), displaying characteristic fragment ions at m/z 159 ([M-H-CO2]−), 142 ([M-H-CH3NO2]−), and 116 [22,23,24]. Meanwhile, azelaic acid, a dicarboxylic acid, was assigned as peak 15 (m/z 187.0959), displaying fragment ions at m/z 125 ([M-H-CH2-O3]−), m/z 97 ([M-H-C3H6O3]−), and m/z 57 ([M-H-C6H10O3]−) [30,32].

2.2. UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS (Positive Ionization Mode) Profile of Clitorea ternatea Crude Root Extract

Several amino acids were exclusively identified in the positive ionization mode where their peaks appeared in the first 5 min. These amino acids were identified as: proline (m/z 116.0695), with a single fragment ion at m/z 70 ([M+H-H2O-CO]+); isoleucine (m/z 132.1005), with fragment ions appearing at m/z 86 ([M+H-H2O-CO]+) and 69 ([M+H-H2O-CO-NH3]+); and phenylalanine (m/z 166.0844), with key fragment ions at m/z 149 ([M-H-NH3]+), 120 ([M+H-H2O-CO]+), 131 ([M+H-NH3-H2O]+), and 103 ([M+H-NH3-H2O-CO]+). The identification of these amino acids was consistent with previous published reports [30,31,32,45,46,47].
Furthermore, positive ionization allowed the identification of the isoflavanol ambanol (peak 28), which exhibited a protonated molecular ion at m/z 341.0979, and fragment ions at m/z 323 ([M-H-H2O]−), 308 ([M+H-H2O-CH3]+), 295 ([M+H-H2O-CO]+), 281 ([M+H-H2O-CH2O]+), and 263 ([M+H-H2O-CO-CH3OH]+). Based on these spectral data, the fragmentation pathway was deduced using Mass Frontier 3.0 software, and is illustrated in Supplementary Materials Figure S9. Additionally, the clitorienolactones (17, 18, 23, and 24), clitorienolactone glycosides (7, 11–14), flavonoids (19–21, 26–31), and flavonoid glycoside (16) were also detected in positive ion mode. The MS/MS data that listed their fragment ions and their peak assignments are shown in Supplementary Materials Table S1 and Figure S10.

2.3. Metabolite Composition of the Ethyl Acetate and 50% MeOH Fractions

To further investigate the distribution of metabolites across fractions of varying solvent polarities, the crude extract of C. ternatea root was fractionated into several fractions using SPE. In contrast to the ethyl acetate and 50% methanol fractions, the yields of the aqueous and hexane fractions were too small for subsequent bioactivity, as depicted in Supplementary Materials Table S2. Therefore, only the ethyl acetate and 50% MeOH fractions were subjected to UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS analysis. The chemical profiles of both fractions in negative ion mode, and the relative abundance of the metabolites, are illustrated in Figure 3. It could be observed that, although the major free lignans, clitorienolactones A (24) and B (23), were present in both fractions, the norneolignans and their respective glycosides, (5–8, 11–14) were more soluble in the 50% MeOH fraction (Figure 3A,B). On the other hand, the flavonoidal constituents were more soluble in the EA fraction (Figure 3C,D).

2.4. Effect on Reserpine-Induced Stress in Zebrafish

The effect of the crude MeOH and solvent fractions of C. ternatea roots was evaluated on a reserpine-induced stress zebrafish model, developed and optimized according to our previous work [48]. The behavioral changes of the model were observed using the novel tank test. Several parameters were monitored and recorded as measurements for the stress-like behavior, consisting of freezing duration, total distance travelled, and average velocity. The effects of the crude extract and solvent fractions on the selected behavior parameters are presented in Figure 4. As shown in Figure 4A, the model groups 2–6 exhibited significantly longer freezing duration, lower total distance travelled, and reduced average swimming velocity, compared to the control group (PBS). These results indicate that reserpine treatment has successfully induced stress-like behavior in the zebrafish, consistent with previous findings, where reserpine treatment produced diminished motor coordination and reduced exploratory behavior in zebrafish. Diminished motor coordination and reduced exploratory behavior are also among the accepted symptoms for depression [49]. Treatment of the model with fluoxetine (positive control) showed reduction in freezing duration, and increments in the total distance travelled and average velocity, with values comparable to those of the control group (p > 0.05), 24 h after the treatment (Figure 4B). Fluoxetine has been commonly used in similar research as a positive standard drug, to alleviate novelty stress and anxiety in zebrafish, and to test the predictive validity of the animal model [50,51]. The behavioral changes shown by the fluoxetine-treated group showed that the stress-like behavior in the zebrafish was reversible after exposure to the drug.
In contrast to the positive control, the stress-like behavior in groups treated with the crude methanolic extract and solvent fractions of C. ternatea roots persisted up to 48 h post-treatment (Figure 4C). In fact, the group treated with the crude methanolic extract showed no signs of recovery, and remained in the stress-like state even up to 72 h post-treatment. However, at 72 h post-treatment, there were clear behavioral changes observed in groups treated with the EA and 50% MeOH fractions, as shown in Figure 4D. The freezing duration of both groups decreased significantly in comparison to the untreated group (p < 0.05), although the durations remained statistically higher those that of the control and fluoxetine-treated groups (p < 0.001). The total distance travelled and average swimming velocity values of both groups were also significantly increased, with values higher than the untreated group (p < 0.05). It is also worthy of note that the group treated with the EA fraction displayed more pronounced recovery in mobility and exploratory behavior, where their swimming velocity and the distance travelled were comparable to those of the normal and fluoxetine-treated groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, the behavioral parameters were improved to a lesser extent for the groups treated with the 50% MeOH fraction, where the distance travelled and average swimming velocity values were still significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). The results suggest that the stress-relieving constituents of C. ternatea roots are mainly those present in the EA and 50% MeOH fractions. Based on the metabolite profile of the EA fraction obtained via UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS analysis, the bioactivity could be attributed to the presence of both the free clitorienolactones and the flavonoids, since these compounds were detected in higher abundance compared to other compounds in the EA fraction. On the other hand, bioactivity of the 50% MeOH fraction could be attributable to the presence of the free clitorienolactones and their O-glycosides, since they were relatively more abundant in this fraction compared to the flavonoids.
Clitorienolactones A and B have previously been found to be responsible for learning and memory enhancement via the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), the enzyme responsible for disrupting the transmission of nerve impulses in the cholinergic system [22,52]. Similarly, to vertebrates, acetylcholine in the cholinergic system of zebrafish plays a key role in both CNS functions (sleeping, attention, learning, and memory) and CNS dysfunctions (immobility, lack of coordination, depression, and memory loss) [53]. For instance, physostigmine, an AChE inhibitor, demonstrated anxiolytic effects [54] and caused the recovery of learning deficits [55] in zebrafish. Henceforth, the ability of clitorienolactones to elevate acetylcholine content in zebrafish brains by suppressing AChE activity may also work in favor of relieving stress-like symptoms. However, several studies have found contradicting results on the effects of AChE inhibition on murine models of depression. Behavioral studies have discovered that enhancing ACh neurotransmission in the hippocampus via AChE inhibition is enough to evoke anxiety- and depression-like symptoms in rodents, which were later alleviated through fluoxetine administration [56,57,58]. Similar findings have also been reported for adolescents who have been exposed to substantial amounts of cholinesterase inhibitors in agricultural pesticides [59]. The cholinergic–adrenergic theory of depression may explain these results, where overactivity of the cholinergic system over the adrenergic system was hypothesized to lead to depression [60]. Therefore, some researchers concluded that maintaining a homeostatic level of ACh in the hippocampus is crucial to controlling emotional behavior [57]. Due to their ability in inhibiting AChE, we proposed that the clitorienolactones A and B played a part in maintaining a homeostatic ACh level in the brains of the zebrafish, particularly in preventing ACh depletion. However, further research is still required in order to understand the neuropharmacological effects of these lignans and their derivatives on both the monoamine and cholinergic systems in the suitable models of stress and depression.
In addition to the norneolignans, several isoflavonoids (daidzein, genistein, glycitein, and formononetin) were also present in relatively small amounts in both the EA and 50% MeOH fractions. Daidzein and genistein are known constituents of pomegranate extract, which have been shown to exert antidepressant effects on menopause-related depression in ovariectomized mice [61]. Meanwhile, in a separate study, genistein was shown to have the ability to evoke antidepressant-like effects in rats by adjusting their hippocampal serotonergic metabolism when stressed [62]. Formononetin has also been identified as one of the active compounds with an effective inhibitory effect against monoamine oxidase, an enzyme responsible for the degradation of monoamine neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine [63]. Thus, we hypothesize that the ability of these isoflavonoids to modulate serotonergic function may explain the plant’s efficacy in alleviating stress-like behavior in the zebrafish model. Further studies into the effect of this class of compounds are therefore needed in order to confirm this hypothesis, in addition to further investigation into the possible synergistic effects between the clitorienolactones, isoflavones, and other minor constituents detected in the bioactive fractions.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Materials

LCMS-grade methanol, acetonitrile, water, and formic acid were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH, USA), while reserpine (>99%, HPLC-grade) and fluoxetine hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The standards, daidzein (≥98%), genistein (≥98%), biochanin A (≥98%), and formononetin (≥98%) were purchased from ChemFaces (Wuhan, China). Phosphate buffer saline (PBS) buffer (pH 7.4) was purchased from R&M Chemicals (Petaling Jaya, Malaysia). The solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge used was a silica-based Chromabond C18 polypropylene column (MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). Holding water for the zebrafish during acclimatization and for experimental procedures was sourced from Coway-filtered tap water treated with water conditioner (Tension gon, Mydilab, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia). The syringe and needle (Ultra-Fine II, 0.30 mm (30 G) × 8 mm (5/16″), 0.5 mL) used for intraperitoneal (IP) injection were obtained from Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA. All tanks used were standard plastic tanks (3 L, 5 L, and 7 L) bought from 3B Aquatics, Bangi, Malaysia.

3.2. Plant Material

Whole plants of Clitorea ternatea were purchased from a plant nursery in Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. Species authentication was performed by the Biodiversity Unit at the Institute of Bioscience, and a voucher specimen (SK 3297/18) was deposited at the Unit’s mini-herbarium. The roots were harvested from each plant, cleaned, and dried under shade for 7 days. The dried roots were cut into small pieces, ground into a fine powder, and stored in a vacuum desiccator until further use.

3.3. Solvent Extraction of Dried Roots

For extraction, the dry powder was weighed (56 g), mixed with methanol at a solid:liquid ratio of 1:20 (g:mL), and sonicated (53 kHz) for 30 min, with the temperature maintained between 27 and 30 °C. After solvent removal, the extract was further concentrated in a rotary evaporator and subjected to freeze-drying over three days in order to completely remove any moisture. The resulting process yielded a light brown, powdered extract (7.84 g, 14% yield), labelled “CTRE”.

3.4. Fractionation of Crude Extract

The methanolic extract of C. ternatea roots was subjected to solid-phase extraction (SPE) using C18 SPE cartridges (60 Å pore size, 45 um particle size, 6 mL volume, 1 g adsorbent weight) to give four fractions, namely, aqueous, 50% methanol, ethyl acetate, and hexane fractions. The cartridge was first activated using methanol (LCMS grade, 3 mL). Next, deionized water (6 mL) was used to remove excess MeOH by applying a gentle vacuum. The extract (20 mg) was reconstituted in 1 mL water prior to the SPE. After sample loading, the cartridge was eluted with deionized water, followed by 50% aqueous MeOH, ethyl acetate, and then hexane. The eluents were collected in test tubes, and after solvent removal, the weight and yield of each solvent fraction were recorded.

3.5. UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS Analysis

The UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS analysis was conducted using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system coupled with a Thermo Scientific™ Q Exactive™ Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The UHPLC system was equipped with a diode array detector (DAD), scanning from 190 to 800 nm. Crude extract and fraction samples for analysis were prepared in methanol at 2 mg/mL and filtered through a 0.22 µm nylon membrane. Meanwhile, another crude extract sample (1 mL) was spiked with 100 μL of standards prepared at 0.135 mg/mL for qualitative analysis. Analyte separation was performed using a reversed-phase Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 column (100 mm × 2.1 mm × 1.7 um) (Waters, Ireland) with a gradient mobile phase consisting of LCMS-grade acetonitrile (solvent A) and water (solvent B), each containing 0.1% formic acid. The gradient system consisted of 5% solvent A in the first 0.3 min, followed by 5–80% A in the next 15 min. The flow rate of the mobile phase was set at 0.5 mL/min, while the injection volume was 10 µL. Meanwhile, the UV detector was set to 260, 254, 310, and 350 nm while the PDA detector was set to 190–800 nm. The MS/MS parameters were set as follows: negative and positive ion mode (done separately), collision energy of 30 eV, spray voltage 4.2 kV, capillary temperature of 320 °C, auxiliary gas heater temperature of 0 °C, sheath gas flow rate of 40 arbitrary units, and auxiliary nitrogen (99% pure) gas unit flow rate of 8. The mass resolution was set to 70,000 full widths at half maximum (FWHM), and the scan ranged between 102 and 1532 amu. All chromatographic methods were conducted at room temperature, and the resulting peaks from the tandem mass spectrometry were analyzed and annotated using Thermo Xcalibur 2.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and compared with information from previous literature and online databases.

3.6. Zebrafish and Maintenance

Adult zebrafish (4–5 months old) of common wild-type (WT) stock (short-fin phenotype) were purchased from a local supplier (3B Aquatics, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia). The fish were bred under standard husbandry conditions, maintained in treated filtered water at room temperature 28 °C, pH 7.0, and in a 14 h light and 10 h dark cycle (light onset: 8 a.m.; offset: 10 p.m.). The fish were fed with a commercial flake fish food (Ziegler, Gardners, PA, USA) three times per day, ad libitum. The standard fish tanks were equipped with air pumps in order to ensure constant aeration and to maximize oxygen content in the holding water. The fish were acclimatized under lab conditions at least 7 days prior to experiments.

3.7. Induction of Stress

Induction of stress in zebrafish was carried out based on previously published research [48,64]. The fish were divided into 6 groups of 10 fish (5 males; 5 females). Group 1 was given PBS buffer at 5 uL/g bodyweight (BW), serving as the vehicle control. Intraperitoneal (IP) injections of reserpine (20 mg/kg BW) were administered to Groups 2–6 in order to induce stress-like responses. Before carrying out the induction, the acclimatized fish underwent fasting for 24 h. Prior to injection, the fish were anesthetized by immersion in a bath of iced water (12 °C), until operculum movement ceased or until only the gills were moving [65]. Treatments were then administered to the stress-induced fish via the immersion method, 24 h post-injection. Group 2 (positive control) was treated with 30 min immersion in 0.6 mg/L fluoxetine solution. Group 3 (negative control) received no treatment. Test sample treatment groups 4, 5, and 6 were treated with 6 h of immersion in 35 mg/L of the CTRE (Group 4), EA (Group 5), and 50% MeOH (Group 6) fractions, respectively. Fluoxetine and test sample solutions were prepared using Milli-Q water prior to immersion treatment. The fish groupings and workflow for the in vivo assay are illustrated in Figure 5. The experimental setup and procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Use Committee (IACUC) of Universiti Putra Malaysia on 10 June 2015 (AUP-R013/2015).

3.8. Behavioral Assay: Novel Tank Test

Twenty-four hours after reserpine-induced stress, the animals were individually submitted to the novel tank test for behavioral measurements, carried out according to a previously developed method [50]. For the measurement, the fish were carefully placed in individual 3 L tanks (novel tanks) filled with holding water (2 L) for 6 min. The novel tanks were rested on a flat platform, bottom-lit with white light, and white cardboard was placed between the tanks in order to prevent visual contact with fish from neighboring tanks. The water in the tanks was changed for each test. Once placed in the novel tank, the swimming pattern and movement of the fish were video recorded and tracked using ZebraLab software (Viewpoint, Civrieux, Rhone-Alpes, France). The following endpoints were measured: freezing duration (s), average velocity (cm/s), and total distance travelled (cm). Freezing is defined as complete absence of fish movement except for the eyes and gills for a period of 1s or longer [50,66]. On the other hand, the total distance travelled and average velocity are measurements based on the total distance and speed with which the fish swam over the 6 min test duration. Subsequent behavioral measurements were taken at every 24-h interval, up to 72 h post-treatment.

3.9. Statistical Analysis

Data acquired from the novel tank test were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 17.0 software. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the experimental data, and the means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test.

4. Conclusions

The metabolome of C. ternatea roots was putatively profiled using UHPLC–PDA detection and ESI–MS/MS analysis. A total of 32 metabolites, comprising lignans, lignan glycosides, flavonoids, flavonoid glycosides, amino acids, and carboxylic acids, were identified in the crude methanol extract. Chemical profiling of the fractions revealed that both the EA and 50% methanol fractions contained the free clitorienolactones. However, the EA fraction was found to be richer in the flavonoidal constituents, while the 50% MeOH fraction was richer in the clitorienolactone glycosides. Both the EA and 50% MeOH fractions exhibited moderate effects on stress-induced zebrafish, which were concluded to be due to the combined effects of the clitorienolactones and flavonoidal constituents, specifically the isoflavonoids. The results of the present study highlight the potential therapeutic value of C. ternatea roots in treating brain-related conditions, such as stress, anxiety, and depression, which thus merit further research for a deeper understanding of their mode and mechanism of action. Such studies should be performed on the isolated bioactive constituents, or in the form of standardized botanical extract preparation, with the aim of realizing C. ternatea’s potential as a drug lead, or its development as a phytomedicine for mental healthcare.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: Figure S1: UV spectra of compound 17 (i), compound 18 (ii), compound 23 (iii) and compound 24 (iv); Figure S2: Comparison between the mass spectra of crude root extract (A) and crude root extract spiked with isoflavones standards (B); Figure S3: Proposed fragmentation pathway of compound 20 (3′,4′-dimethoxyflavonol); Figure S4: Proposed fragmentation pathway of compound 22 (Diosmetin); Figure S5: Proposed fragmentation pathway of compound 26 (luteolin-3′,4′-dimethyl ether); Figure S6: Proposed fragmentation pathway of compound 27 (Hoslundal); Figure S7: Proposed fragmentation pathway of compound 29 & 31 (Ambanone and its isomer); Figure S8: Proposed fragmentation pathway of compound 30 (Neoraunone); Figure S9: Proposed fragmentation pathway of compound 28 (Ambanol); Figure S10: (A) LC-DAD and (B) LC-MS base peak chromatogram profiles of Clitorea ternatea crude root extract in positive mode; Table S1: Metabolite profiles of Clitorea ternatea root extract in positive MS/MS; Table S2: Yield of aqueous, ethyl acetate, 50% methanol and hexane fractions from SPE.

Author Contributions

Investigation, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft, visualization, conceptualization: M.A.N.; resources, methodology, data curation: M.T.A.; supervision, methodology: I.S.I.; writing—review and editing: S.Y.L.; investigation, resources: A.I.N.; data curation, formal analysis: M.M.; conceptualization, methodology, validation, resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition: K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Animal Care Use Committee (IACUC) of Universiti Putra Malaysia on 10 June 2015 (AUP-R013/2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Wan Hamidah and Fauziahanim for their assistance and guidance in zebrafish husbandry and handling procedures. Zurina Zainal is thanked for her help with UHPLC–DAD–MS/MS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed.; American Psychiatric Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Paris, J. The Mistreatment of Major Depressive Disorder. Can. J. Psychiatry 2014, 59, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yin, X.; Guven, N.; Dietis, N. Stress-based animal models of depression: Do we actually know what we are doing? Brain Res. 2016, 1652, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gutman, D.; Nemeroff, C. The Hand Book of Stress Science: Biology, Psychology and Health, 1st ed.; Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 345–357. [Google Scholar]
  6. Czéh, B.; Michaelis, T.; Watanabe, T.; Frahm, J.; De Biurrun, G.; Van Kampen, M.; Bartolomucci, A.; Fuchs, E. Stress-induced changes in cerebral metabolites, hippocampal volume, and cell proliferation are prevented by antidepressant treatment with tianeptine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 12796–12801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Willner, P. The chronic mild stress (CMS) model of depression: History, evaluation and usage. Neurobiol. Stress 2017, 6, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Fonseka, T.M.; Wen, X.Y.; Foster, J.A.; Kennedy, S.H. Zebrafish Models of Major Depressive Disorders. J. Neurosci. Res. 2016, 94, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Schechter, L.; Ring, R.; Beyer, C.; Hughes, Z.; Khawaja, X.; Malberg, J.; Rosenzweig-Lipson, S. Innovative approaches for the development of antidepressant drugs: Current and future strategies. NeuroRX 2005, 2, 590–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wilson, K.; Mottram, P. A comparison of side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in older depressed patients: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2004, 19, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mischoulon, D. Popular Herbal and Natural Remedies Used in Psychiatry. FOCUS 2018, 16, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Anand, S.; Doss, A.; Nandagopalan, V. Antibacterial Studies on Leaves of Clitoria ternatea Linn. A High Potential Medicinal Plant. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharmaceut. Tech. 2011, 2, 453–456. [Google Scholar]
  13. Doyle, J.; Luckow, M. The Rest of the Iceberg. Legume Diversity and Evolution in a Phylogenetic Context. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jain, N.; Ohal, C.; Shroff, S.; Bhutada, R.; Somani, R.; Kasture, V.; Kasture, S. Clitorea ternatea and the CNS. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2003, 75, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mukherjee, P.; Kumar, V.; Mal, M.; Houghton, P. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants. Phytomedicine 2007, 14, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Margret, A.; Begum, T.; Parthasarathy, S.; Suvaithenamudhan, S. A Strategy to Employ Clitorea ternatea as a Prospective Brain Drug Confronting Monoamine Oxidase (MAO) Against Neurodegenerative Diseases and Depression. Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting 2015, 5, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Parvathi, M.; Ravishankar, K. Evaluation of Antidepressant, Motor Coordination and Locomotor Activities of Ethanolic Root Extract of Clitorea ternatea. J. Nat. Remedies 2013, 13, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  18. Parimaladevi, B.; Boominathan, R.; Mandal, S. Evaluation of antipyretic potential of Clitorea ternatea L. extract in rats. Phytomedicine 2004, 11, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Parimaladevi, B.; Boominathan, R.; Mandal, S. Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic properties of Clitorea ternatea root. Fitoterapia 2003, 74, 345–349. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rai, K.; Murthy, K.; Karanth, K.; Nalini, K.; Rao, M.; Srinivasan, K. Clitorea ternatea Root Extract Enhances Acetylcholine Content in Rat Hippocampus. Fitoterapia 2002, 73, 685–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Taranalli, A.; Cheeramkuzhy, T. Influence of Clitorea ternatea Extracts on Memory and Central Cholinergic Activity in Rats. Pharm. Biol. 2000, 38, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vasisht, K.; Dhobi, M.; Khullar, S.; Mandal, S.; Karan, M. Norneolignans from the roots of Clitorea ternatea L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 1758–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rajagopalan, N. Free amino acids and amides in legume root nodules. Curr. Sci. 1964, 33, 454–456. [Google Scholar]
  24. Benerjee, S.K.; Chakravarti, R.N. Taraxerol from Clitorea ternatea linn. Bull. Calcutta Sch. Trop. Med. 1964, 11, 106–107. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kumar, V.; Mukherjee, K.; Kumar, S.; Mal, M.; Mukherjee, P. Validation of HPTLC method for the analysis of taraxerol in Clitorea ternatea. Phytochem. Anal. 2007, 19, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Berté, T.E.; Dalmagro, A.P.; Zimath, P.L.; Gonçalves, A.E.; Meyre-Silva, C.; Bürger, C.; Weber, C.J.; Dos Santos, D.A.; Cechinel-Filho, V.; De Souza, M.M. Taraxerol as a possible therapeutic agent on memory impairments and Alzheimer’s disease: Effects against scopolamine and streptozotocin-induced cognitive dysfunctions. Steroids 2018, 132, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nguyen, M.; Yang, E.; Neelkantan, N.; Mikhaylova, A.; Arnold, R.; Poudel, M.; Stewart, A.; Kalueff, A. Developing ‘integrative’ zebrafish models of behavioral and metabolic disorders. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 256, 172–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stewart, A.; Nguyen, M.; Wong, K.; Poudel, M.; Kalueff, A. Developing zebrafish models of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 50, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kalueff, A.; Echevarria, D.; Stewart, A. Gaining translational momentum: More zebrafish models for neuroscience research. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2014, 55, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Horai, H.; Arita, M.; Kanaya, S.; Nihei, Y.; Ikeda, T.; Suwa, K.; Ojima, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, S.; Aoshima, K.; et al. MassBank: A public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 45, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Piraud, M.; Vianey-Saban, C.; Petritis, K.; Elfakir, C.; Steghens, J.; Morla, A.; Bouchu, D. ESI-MS/MS analysis of underivatised amino acids: A new tool for the diagnosis of inherited disorders of amino acid metabolism. Fragmentation study of 79 molecules of biological interest in positive and negative ionisation mode. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 1297–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Smith, C.; Maille, G.; Want, E.; Qin, C.; Trauger, S.; Brandon, T.; Custodio, D.; Abagyan, R.; Siuzdak, G. METLIN. Ther. Drug Monit. 2005, 27, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kang, J.; Hick, L.; Price, W. A fragmentation study of isoflavones in negative electrospray ionization by MSn ion trap mass spectrometry and triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rijke, E.D.; Out, P.; Niessen, W.; Ariese, F.; Gooijer, C.; Brinkman, U. Analytical separation and detection methods for flavonoids. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1112, 31–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Justesen, U. Collision-induced fragmentation of deprotonated methoxylated flavonoids, obtained by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 36, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wähälä, K.; Rasku, S.; Parikka, K. Deuterated phytoestrogen flavonoids and isoflavonoids for quantitation. J. Chromatogr. B 2002, 777, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. March, R.; Miao, X.; Metcalfe, C.; Stobiecki, M.; Marczak, L. A fragmentation study of an isoflavone glycoside, genistein-7-O-glucoside, using electrospray quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry at high mass resolution. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 232, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ablajan, K. A study of characteristic fragmentation of isoflavonoids by using negative ion ESI-MSn. J. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 46, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eklund, P.; Backman, M.; Kronberg, L.; Smeds, A.; Sjöholm, R. Identification of lignans by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization ion-trap mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 43, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cuyckens, F.; Claeys, M. Optimization of a liquid chromatography method based on simultaneous electrospray ionization mass spectrometric and ultraviolet photodiode array detection for analysis of flavonoid glycosides. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 16, 2341–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, Q.M.; Claeys, M. Characterization and differentiation of diglycosyl flavonoids by positive ion fast atom bombardment and tandem mass spectrometry. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 23, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, J.; Sun, B.; Han, F.; Yan, S.; Hua, Y.; Akio, K. Rapid HPLC method for determination of 12 isoflavone components in soybean seeds. Agric. Sci. China 2011, 10, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Prasain, J.K.; Jones, K.; Kirk, M.; Wilson, L.; Smith-Johnson, M.; Weaver, C.; Barnes, S. Profiling and Quantification of Isoflavonoids in Kudzu Dietary Supplements by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Electrospray Ionization Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 4213–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wishart, D.; Tzur, D.; Knox, C.; Eisner, R.; Guo, A.; Young, N.; Cheng, D.; Jewell, K.; Arndt, D.; Sawhney, S.; et al. HMDB: The Human Metabolome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, D521–D526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Choi, S.-S.; Song, M.J.; Kim, O.-B.; Kim, Y. Fragmentation patterns of protonated amino acids formed by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 27, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kennedy, A.; Adam, B. Methods for the Analysis of Underivatized Amino Acids by LC/MS. Available online: https://www.agilent.com/cs/library/applications/5991-8582EN_HILIC_Underivatized_Amino_Acid_application.pdf (accessed on 9 November 2020).
  47. Takano, Y.; Yoshito, C.; Naohiko, O. LC/ESI-MS Analysis of Underivatized Amino Acids and Mass Spectrum. Res. Org. Geochem. 2015, 31, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zakaria, F.; Akhtar, M.T.; Wan Ibrahim, W.N.; Abu Bakar, N.; Muhammad, A.; Shohaimi, S.; Maulidiani, M.; Ahmad, H.; Ismail, I.S.; Shaari, K. Perturbations in Amino Acid Metabolism in Reserpine-treated Zebrafish Brain Detected by 1H NMR-Based Metabolomics. Zebrafish 2020, 18, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kyzar, E.; Stewart, A.; Landsman, S.; Collins, C.; Gebhardt, M.; Robinson, K.; Kalueff, A. Behavioral effects of bidirectional modulators of brain monoamines reserpine and d-amphetamine in zebrafish. Brain Res. 2013, 1527, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cachat, J.; Stewart, A.; Grossman, L.; Gaikwad, S.; Kadri, F.; Chung, K.; Wu, N.; Wong, K.; Roy, S.; Suciu, C.; et al. Measuring behavioral and endocrine responses to novelty stress in adult zebrafish. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1786–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Egan, R.J.; Bergner, C.L.; Hart, P.C.; Cachat, J.M.; Canavello, P.R.; Elegante, M.F.; Elkhayat, S.I.; Bartels, B.K.; Tien, A.K.; Tien, D.H.; et al. Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behav. Brain Res. 2009, 205, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Murray, A.P.; Faraoni, M.B.; Castro, M.J.; Alza, N.P.; Cavallaro, V. Natural AChE Inhibitors from Plants and their Contribution to Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2013, 11, 388–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Stewart, A.M.; Ullmann, J.F.; Norton, W.H.; Parker, M.O.; Brennan, C.H.; Gerlai, R.; Kalueff, A.V. Molecular psychiatry of zebrafish. Mol. Psychiatry 2015, 20, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Haneul, C.; Chang-Joong, L.; Jiseon, C.; Jinsoo, H.; Yunkyoung, L. Anxiolytic effects of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, physostigmine, in the adult zebrafish. Anim. Cells Syst. 2012, 16, 198–206. [Google Scholar]
  55. Yong-seok, C.; Chang-Joong, L.; Yeon-Hwa, K. MK-801-induced learning impairments reversed by physostigmine and nicotine in zebrafish. Anim. Cells Syst. 2011, 15, 115–121. [Google Scholar]
  56. McCloskey, M.; Young, T.; Anderson, S. Research Article: The influence of acetylcholinesterase on anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in fluoxetine-treated male mice. BIOS 2017, 88, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mineur, Y.; Obayemi, A.; Wigestrand, M.; Fote, G.; Calarco, C.; Li, A.; Picciotto, M. Cholinergic signaling in the hippocampus regulates social stress resilience and anxiety- and depression-like behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 3573–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Saricicek, A.; Esterlis, I.; Maloney, K.; Mineur, Y.; Ruf, B.; Muralidharan, A.; Chen, J.; Cosgrove, K.; Kerestes, R.; Ghose, S.; et al. Persistent β2*-Nicotinic Acetylcholinergic Receptor Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 2012, 169, 851–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Suarez-Lopez, J.; Hood, N.; Suárez-Torres, J.; Gahagan, S.; Gunnar, M.; López-Paredes, D. Associations of acetylcholinesterase activity with depression and anxiety symptoms among adolescents growing up near pesticide spray sites. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2019, 222, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Janowsky, D.; Davis, J.; El-Yousef, M.; Sekerke, H. A Cholinergic-Adrenergic Hypothesis of Mania and Depression. Lancet 1972, 300, 632–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mori-Okamoto, J.; Otawara-Hamamoto, Y.; Yamato, H.; Yoshimura, H. Pomegranate extract improves a depressive state and bone properties in menopausal syndrome model ovariectomized mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 92, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kageyama, A.; Sakakibara, H.; Zhou, W.; Yoshioka, M.; Ohsumi, M.; Shimoi, K.; Yokogoshi, H. Genistein Regulated Serotonergic Activity in the Hippocampus of Ovariectomized Rats under Forced Swimming Stress. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2010, 74, 2005–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hwang, J.; Lee, S.; Hong, S.; Lee, K.; Lee, M.; Hwang, B.; Ro, J. Monoamine oxidase inhibitory components from the roots of Sophora flavescens. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2005, 28, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Saroya, R.; Smith, R.; Seymour, C.; Mothersill, C. Injection of Reserpine into Zebrafish, Prevents Fish to Fish Communication of Radiation-induced Bystander Signals: Confirmation In-vivo of a Role for Serotonin in the Mechanism. Dose Response 2010, 8, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Kinkel, M.; Eames, S.; Philipson, L.; Prince, V. Intraperitoneal Injection into Adult Zebrafish. J. Vis. Exp. 2010, 42, e2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kalueff, A.; Gebhardt, M.; Stewart, A.; Cachat, J.; Brimmer, M.; Chawla, J.; Craddock, C.; Kyzar, E.; Roth, A.; Landsman, S.; et al. Towards a Comprehensive Catalog of Zebrafish Behavior 1.0 and Beyond. Zebrafish 2013, 10, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 26 04137 g001 550
Figure 1. The LC–DAD (A) and LC–MS (B) base peak chromatogram profiles of Clitorea ternatea crude root extract in negative ion mode.
Figure 1. The LC–DAD (A) and LC–MS (B) base peak chromatogram profiles of Clitorea ternatea crude root extract in negative ion mode.
Molecules 26 04137 g001
Molecules 26 04137 g002 550
Figure 2. Proposed characteristic fragmentation pathway of compounds 17, 18, 23, and 24 (Clitorienolactones D, C, B, and A, respectively).
Figure 2. Proposed characteristic fragmentation pathway of compounds 17, 18, 23, and 24 (Clitorienolactones D, C, B, and A, respectively).
Molecules 26 04137 g002
Molecules 26 04137 g003 550
Figure 3. The LC–DAD and LC–MS base peak chromatogram profiles of the 50% MeOH (A,B) and EA (C,D) fractions of Clitorea ternatea roots, in negative ion mode.
Figure 3. The LC–DAD and LC–MS base peak chromatogram profiles of the 50% MeOH (A,B) and EA (C,D) fractions of Clitorea ternatea roots, in negative ion mode.
Molecules 26 04137 g003
Molecules 26 04137 g004 550
Figure 4. Behavioral effects of the crude methanolic extract, EA, and 50% MeOH fractions of Clitorea ternatea roots on the reserpine-induced stress zebrafish model. Behavioral measurements were recorded at (A) 24 h after IP injection of reserpine, (B) 24 h after treatments, (C) 48 h after treatments, and (D) 72 h after treatments for each group, i.e., fluoxetine (0.6 mg/mL, 30 min), CTRE, EA, and 50% MeOH fractions groups (35 mg/mL, 6 h). All values are reported as mean percentage ± SE (n = 10 per group). Duncan’s post-hoc test was used for significant differences, where * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, and *** = p < 0.001. PBS: phosphate buffer saline; FX: fluoxetine; RES: reserpine; CTRE: crude C. ternatea extract; EA: ethyl acetate; MEOH: 50% methanol.
Figure 4. Behavioral effects of the crude methanolic extract, EA, and 50% MeOH fractions of Clitorea ternatea roots on the reserpine-induced stress zebrafish model. Behavioral measurements were recorded at (A) 24 h after IP injection of reserpine, (B) 24 h after treatments, (C) 48 h after treatments, and (D) 72 h after treatments for each group, i.e., fluoxetine (0.6 mg/mL, 30 min), CTRE, EA, and 50% MeOH fractions groups (35 mg/mL, 6 h). All values are reported as mean percentage ± SE (n = 10 per group). Duncan’s post-hoc test was used for significant differences, where * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, and *** = p < 0.001. PBS: phosphate buffer saline; FX: fluoxetine; RES: reserpine; CTRE: crude C. ternatea extract; EA: ethyl acetate; MEOH: 50% methanol.
Molecules 26 04137 g004
Molecules 26 04137 g005 550
Figure 5. Groupings and experimental workflow of the zebrafish in vivo assay.
Figure 5. Groupings and experimental workflow of the zebrafish in vivo assay.
Molecules 26 04137 g005
Table
Table 1. Metabolites putatively identified from the LC–MS/MS (negative ion mode) spectral data of Clitorea ternatea root extract.
Table 1. Metabolites putatively identified from the LC–MS/MS (negative ion mode) spectral data of Clitorea ternatea root extract.
NoRetention Time (RT) (min)Parent Ion
Experimental
(m/z)		Parent Ion
Theoretical
(m/z)		Error (ppm)MS/MS Fragment Ions (Intensity, %)Tentative IdentificationMolecular FormulaSource
Amino Acids and Carboxylic Acids
11.24154.0605154.0615–6.49154 (100), 137 (42), 110 (15)HistidineC6H9N3O2[30]
21.31173.1027173.1038−6.35131 (100)ArginineC6H14N4O2[30]
31.36131.0445131.0456−8.39131 (19), 114 (100), 113 (62), 95 (14), 88 (32), 72 (15), 70 (40), 58 (10)AsparagineC4H8N2O3[31]
44.82203.0811203.0820−4.43203 (72), 159 (20), 142 (28), 116 (100)TryptophanC11H12N2O2[30,32]
157.38187.0959187.0970−5.87187 (47), 125 (100), 97 (8), 57 (3) Azelaic acid C9H16O4[30,32]
Clitorienolactones
177.59297.0754297.0763−3.03297 (20), 253 (100), 191 (5) 159 (10), 133 (20), 119 (34), 109 (23), 93 (20)Clitorienolactone DC17H14O5[22]
187.66327.0858327.0868−3.06327 (26), 283 (67), 267 (100), 161 (11), 159 (14), 109 (6)Clitorienolactone CC18H16O6[22]
238.41311.0910311.0919−2.89311 (32), 205 (74), 191 (10), 190 (100), 161 (9)Clitorienolactone BC18H16O5[22]
248.47341.1013341.1025−3.51341 (42), 205 (68), 191 (7), 190 (100), 161 (7)Clitorienolactone AC19H18O6[22]
Clitorienolactone Glycosides
55.29621.1796621.1819−3.70621 (6), Y1−: 459 (25), Y0−: 297 (19), 253 (100)Clitorienolactone D 4-O-dihexosideC29H34O15-
65.84651.1931651.19250.92651 (5), Y1−: 489 (35), Y0−: 327 (35), 283 (100), 268 (54)Clitorienolactone C 4-O-dihexosideC30H36O16-
75.85635.1950635.1976−4.09Y1−: 473 (31), Y0−: 311 (100), 205 (79), 190 (20)Clitorienolactone B 4-O-dihexosideC30H36O15-
85.95665.2057665.2081−3.61Y1−: 503 (33),
Y0−: 341 (100), 205 (65),190 (16)		Clitorienolactone A 4-O-dihexosideC31H38O16-
116.53459.1278459.1291−2.83459 (8), Y0−: 297 (43), 253 (100),109 (8)Clitorienolactone D 4-O-hexosideC23H24O10-
126.63489.1383489.1396−2.66489 (6), Y0−: 327 (83), 283 (100), 268 (67)Clitorienolactone C 4-O-hexosideC24H26O11-
136.85503.1537503.1553−3.18Y0−: 341 (100), 205 (80), 190 (52), 161 (4)Clitorienolactone A 4-O-hexosideC25H28O11-
147.15473.1429473.1447−3.8473 (18), Y0−: 311 (96), 205 (100), 190 (49), 161 (5)Clitorienolactone B 4-O-hexosideC24H26O10-
Flavonoids
197.89253.0493253.0500−2.76253 (2), 224 (10), 223 (38), 208 (32), 196 (8), 195 (41), 180 (23), 167 (8), 135 (8), 133 (36), 132 (81), 117 (8), 91 (100) Daidzein *C15H10O4[33,34]
208.01297.0753297.0763−3.36297 (38), 282 (100), 267 (10), 254 (30), 239 (28), 195 (4)3′,4′-dimethoxyflavonolC17H14O5[30]
218.04283.0598283.0606−2.82268 (100), 267 (2), 240 (6), 239 (27), 212 (1), 211 (7), 184 (3), 148 (2), 135 (1), Glycitein C16H12O5[33,35]
228.18299.0546299.0555−3.01299 (24), 284 (25), 271 (13), 256 (100), 255 (6)DiosmetinC16H12O6-
258.76269.0444269.0450−2.23269 (100), 241 (7), 224 (3), 213 (1), 197 (4), 183 (5), 135 (10), 133 (4)Genistein *C15H10O5[33,36]
269.11313.0704313.0712−2.55313 (93), 298 (100), 283 (34), 270 (14), 255 (19),239 (6), 226 (83), 211 (43)Luteolin-3′,4′-dimethyl etherC17H14O6[30]
279.19309.0752309.0763−3.56309 (100), 294 (25), 266 (29), 250 (10), 249 (30), 148 (13)HoslundalC18H14O5-
289.34339.0855339.0868−3.83339 (24), 324 (14), 310 (16), 309 (100), 281 (13), 253 (8), 209 (5)AmbanolC19H16O6-
299.46267.0651267.0657−2.25252 (100), 224 (3), 223 (55), 208 (11), 195 (17), 135 (1), 132 (24), 91 (2)Formononetin *C16H12O4[33]
309.77353.1013353.1025−3.40353 (100), 338 (40), 323 (71), 308 (32), 293 (17), 279 (73)AmbononeC20H18O6-
319.98323.0911323.0919−2.47323 (100), 308 (62), 293 (61), 265 (32), 249 (26), 237 (16), 221 (4), 145 (14)NeoraunoneC19H16O5-
3210.34353.1014353.1025−3.11353 (100), 338 (33), 323 (73), 308 (38), 293 (14), 279 (69)Ambonone isomerC20H18O6-
Flavonoid Glycosides
96.05431.0963431.0978−3.48431 (52), Y0−: 269.0446 (26), [Y0−H]−•: 268 (100), 241 (1), 224(4), 135 (1)GenistinC21H20O10[37]
106.25415.1017415.1029−2.89415 (26), Y0−: 253.0494 (32), [Y0−H]−•: 252 (100), 223 (1) DaidzinC21H20O9[38]
167.45445.1124445.1134−2.25Y0−: 283.0612 (100), 268 (8), 267 (1), 255 (16), 240 (2), 239 (2), 133 (40)GlycitinC22H22O10[38]
* Identification of these compounds was confirmed by comparison with the standards (Supplementary Materials Figure S2).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ngadni, M.A.; Akhtar, M.T.; Ismail, I.S.; Norazhar, A.I.; Lee, S.Y.; Maulidiani, M.; Shaari, K. Clitorienolactones and Isoflavonoids of Clitorea ternatea Roots Alleviate Stress-Like Symptoms in a Reserpine-Induced Zebrafish Model. Molecules 2021, 26, 4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144137

AMA Style

Ngadni MA, Akhtar MT, Ismail IS, Norazhar AI, Lee SY, Maulidiani M, Shaari K. Clitorienolactones and Isoflavonoids of Clitorea ternatea Roots Alleviate Stress-Like Symptoms in a Reserpine-Induced Zebrafish Model. Molecules. 2021; 26(14):4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ngadni, Muhammad Afiq, Muhammad Tayyab Akhtar, Intan Safinar Ismail, Anis Irfan Norazhar, Soo Yee Lee, Maulidiani Maulidiani, and Khozirah Shaari. 2021. "Clitorienolactones and Isoflavonoids of Clitorea ternatea Roots Alleviate Stress-Like Symptoms in a Reserpine-Induced Zebrafish Model" Molecules 26, no. 14: 4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144137

APA Style

Ngadni, M. A., Akhtar, M. T., Ismail, I. S., Norazhar, A. I., Lee, S. Y., Maulidiani, M., & Shaari, K. (2021). Clitorienolactones and Isoflavonoids of Clitorea ternatea Roots Alleviate Stress-Like Symptoms in a Reserpine-Induced Zebrafish Model. Molecules, 26(14), 4137. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26144137

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop