Next Article in Journal
In Situ Water Quantification in Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents Using Portable Raman Spectroscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Analytical Assessment of Bioelements in Various Types of Black Teas from Different Geographical Origins in View of Chemometric Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Caffeic Acid on Metabolic Syndrome: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure, Bioactivity and Analytical Methods for the Determination of Yucca Saponins
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Phenolic Compounds Profile and Cosmeceutical Significance of Two Kazakh Species of Onions: Alliumgalanthum and A. turkestanicum

by
Gulnara Kadyrbayeva
1,
Justyna Zagórska
2,
Agnieszka Grzegorczyk
3,
Katarzyna Gaweł-Bęben
4,
Marcelina Strzępek-Gomółka
4,
Agnieszka Ludwiczuk
5,
Karolina Czech
4,
Manoj Kumar
6,
Wojciech Koch
2,
Anna Malm
3,
Kazimierz Głowniak
4,
Zuriyadda Sakipova
1 and
Wirginia Kukula-Koch
7,*
1
School of Pharmacy, Kazakh National Medical University (KazNMU), Almaty 050012, Kazakhstan
2
Chair and Department of Food and Nutrition, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
3
Chair and Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
4
Department of Cosmetology, University of Information Technology and Management, 35-225 Rzeszów, Poland
5
Independent Laboratory of Natural Products Chemistry, Department of Pharmacognosy, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
6
Chemical and Biochemical Processing Division, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai 400019, India
7
Chair and Department of Pharmacognosy, Medical University in Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(18), 5491; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185491
Submission received: 16 August 2021 / Revised: 6 September 2021 / Accepted: 7 September 2021 / Published: 9 September 2021

Abstract

:
Numerous species of Allium genus have been used in the traditional medicine based on their vast biological effects, e.g., antimicrobial, digestion stimulant, anti-sclerotic, soothing, antiradical or wound healing properties. In this work, unpolar and polar extracts from two lesser-investigated species of Allium growing in Kazakhstan, Allium galanthum Kar. & Kir. (AG) and A. turkestanicum Regel. (AT), were studied for their composition and biological effects. In the HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS analyses of water and alcoholic extracts simple organic acids, flavonoids and their glycosides were found to be the best represented group of secondary metabolites. On the other hand, in the GC-MS analysis diethyl ether, extracts were found to be rich sources of straight-chain hydrocarbons and their alcohols, fatty acids and sterols. The antimicrobial activity assessment showed a lower activity of polar extracts, however, the diethyl ether extract from AT bulbs and AG chives showed the strongest activity against Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, B. cereus ATCC 10876, some species of Staphylococcus (S. aureus ATCC 25923 and S. epidermidis ATCC 12228) and all tested Candida species (Candida albicans ATCC 2091, Candida albicans ATCC 10231, Candida glabrata ATCC 90030, Candida krusei ATCC 14243 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019) with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.125–0.5 mg/mL. The highest antiradical capacity exhibited diethyl ether extracts from AG bulbs (IC50 = 19274.78 ± 92.11 mg Trolox eq/g of dried extract) in DPPH assay. In ABTS scavenging assay, the highest value of mg Trolox equivalents, 50.85 ± 2.90 was calculated for diethyl ether extract from AT bulbs. The same extract showed the highest inhibition of mushroom tyrosinase (82.65 ± 1.28% of enzyme activity), whereas AG bulb ether extract was the most efficient murine tyrosinase inhibitor (54% of the enzyme activity). The performed tests confirm possible cosmeceutical applications of these plants.

1. Introduction

The genus Allium L. is one of the largest among monocotyledons, as it includes over 800 species [1]. Over the years, the number of species belonging to the genus Allium has increased significantly.
The genus Allium is widespread throughout the Nearctic and Palearctic Region. The zone of its occurrence covers the area from the boreal zone to the dry areas of the subtropics [2]. Species belonging to this genus are found mainly in dry regions in the Northern Hemisphere. Its representatives are growing in Asia, North America, South Africa and Europe. However, it is Central Asia that is the most abundant area in various species belonging to the genus Allium and the main center of their distribution [3]. Interestingly, the flora of Kazakhstan is represented by 140 species of the genus, with 45 of them being endemic [4].
The herein presented study focuses on two insufficiently studied species of the described genus growing on the territory of Kazakhstan: Allium Galanthum Kar. & Kir. and A. turkestanicum Regel. The former also called snowdrop onion or Allium pseudocepa Schrenk [5] is growing in the areas from 500–1500 m above sea level, and forms clusters of bulbs, the diameter of which does not exceed 3 cm. The leaves of this plant resemble those of Allium cepa [6,7,8].
A. turkestanicum (AT)–a Turkestan onion, is a wild species native to Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan [9], growing to an almost spherical grey bulb with a diameter of 1.5–3 mm. Its outer shells are paper-like, grey, without noticeable veins and the leaves are 2–10 mm wide, narrowed from the base to the top, and rough at the edge [10].
According to the Scopus database starting from 2009 the number of records related to the password ‘Allium’ exceeded 900 publications per year. A growing interest in the studies on Allium species encouraged the authors to undertake this topic, to determine the composition of extracts and to study the biological activity targeting their cosmeceutical applications of the selected two species of Allium.
The main active compounds of Allium species are sulphur containing metabolites and flavonoids. The former, that include cysteine sulphoxides are probably responsible for the characteristic taste and smell of plants belonging to the genus Allium. Alliin ((+)-S-(2-propenyl)-l-cysteine sulphoxide), isoalliin ((+)-S-(1-propenyl)-l-cysteine sulphoxide), propiine and methiine are the best described components the derivatives of cysteine sulphoxide [11,12,13]. Species belonging to the Cepa subgenus, including A. galanthum, are therefore characterized by a high concentration of the discussed compounds, which is related to their belonging to the third evolutionary line [14].
Traditional use of wild Allium species as natural remedies has been mostly due to a broad influence of sulphur compounds on the physiology of cells. Therefore, they are used as antibiotics, antimycotics and anti-cancer agents, especially in the treatment of gastric cancer [12,13,14,15]. Alliin and higher amounts of propiin have been tested to block the formation of nitrosamines in vitro, which reduces the risk of certain types of cancer. Moreover, alliin has been found to lower blood pressure [16].
Beside the above-described group of metabolites, polyphenols play an important role in the determination of the total biological activity of Allium extracts. Two groups of flavonoids, namely flavonols, the derivatives of quercetin, and anthocyanins, are the major representatives of phenolic components in the bulbs [17,18]. This particular group of secondary metabolites has a marked impact on the cosmetic significance of these plants. Previously 70% ethanolic extract from another species, A. ursinum, was proved to exhibit antioxidant and anti-tyrosinase properties and was claimed as a precious constituent suitable for the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry [19]. Furthermore, an excellent work of Rocchetti and co-investigators [20] underlines the role of different Allium spp. in the inhibition of several types of enzymes, including tyrosinase that confirms cosmeceutical significance of some plant species from this genus. Phetmanee and colleagues [21] except from the aforementioned enzyme inhibitory effects underline the anti-melanogenic effect of Allium ascalonicum extract. Owing to a proved pharmacological potential of polyphenols that have been identified also in Allium spp. [18] and several reports on the cosmetic significance of the representatives of this genus, the Authors of this manuscript found it important to study the phenolic composition of A. galanthum (AG) and A. turkestanicum (AT) extracts and to focus on the bioactivity tests that may be important in terms of the future application in cosmetics. Having in mind a constant growth of cosmetic industry and a high value of cosmetics produced from natural resources, the study tends to find the possible applications of the two selected species for the production of plant-based cosmetics.
The survey involved compositional tests of the obtained extracts using HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS and GC-MS methods, and selected biological activity assays, namely the determination of antimicrobial, antioxidant and α-tyrosinase inhibitory properties to assess the pharmacological potential of the selected insufficiently studied onion species.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. The Extracts Profiling by HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS

The applied chromatographic conditions provided clear mass chromatograms with well-separated metabolites. Negative ionization mode was found preferable to the positive ion mode, as it provided higher sensitivity towards phenolic constituents of the tested extracts. The chromatograms presented in the Figure 1 and Figure S1 in the Supplementary File show the differentiation of the composition of onion (bulb) 50% ethanol extracts compared to the extracts obtained from the above-ground parts of plants (chives). Even if the composition of AG and AT bulb extracts is similar, the chromatogram of the latter species misses clear peaks at 8.5 and 35.5 min, and shows a less abundant one at 19.0 min.
The HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS analysis enabled a tentative identification of the major signals recorded in the obtained chromatograms. As it can be clearly seen, flavonoids and their glycosides constitute the major group of metabolites in the tested extracts. The list of tentatively identified compounds is presented in Table 1, and their MS/MS spectra are showed in the Table S1 in the Supplementary File.
The compositional studies revealed the presence of different types of flavonoids in the tested extracts. Kazakh onions were found to contain both flavonoids’ aglycones and glycosides the derivatives of quercetin, kaempferol, isorhamnetin, dihydroquercetin and an anthocyanin: cyanidin. However, the glycosylated forms were more abundant and in higher concentration from the aglycones. That was the case of quercetin, dihydroquercetin and kaempferol.
The performed chromatographic analyzes indicated that the composition of the bulb extract differed from the extracts obtained from the above-ground parts of plant. The bulbs also differ from each other in the content of individual compounds from the group of polyphenols, which could be seen in the differentiated intensities of the peak areas of the compounds of interest (see Table 1).
An interesting derivative of quercetin, namely its triglycoside, has been identified in the AG similarly to the results of the previously published study of Vijayalakshmi and co-investigators [26]. In the HPLC-MS analysis of the extract from AG chives, two signals for quercetin dihexoside were observed at the retention time of 10.6 and 12.6 min, contrary to the underground extracts’ constituents. The different two peaks can be derived from quercetin derivatives with a differently substituted sugar residue. Interestingly, in the case of the extracts from both bulbs, no second isomer of quercetin hexodise was observed. According to the obtained results, both compounds (m/z signal value 463 u) were present only in the above-ground parts of the plant. Recently Vijayalakshmi and collaborators [26] provided the tentative identification of the two isomers. Quercetin-7,4′-diglucoside was eluted as the first isomer in their analysis that was performed on a chromatographic column with a similar adsorbent (C18 silica gel), whereas quercetin-3,4′-diglucoside was identified as the second isomer.
The kaempferol content was the highest in AG chives. In turn, its amount in the AG bulbs was small, whereas in AT bulbs the presence of trace amounts was confirmed, similarly to its glycosides that were present only in small quantity. Thus, it can be concluded that AT differs in its profile from the other species where the presence of kaempferol was confirmed.
Kaempferol diglucoside that was confirmed in the studied extracts was present in two isoforms, and provided two peaks in the mass chromatograms at the Rt of 10.5 and 11.6 min. The two groups of signals may come from the two substitution isomers with the sugar moieties being attached at different sites to the kaempferol molecule. Previously other authors [23] found several isoforms of this flavonol in the extracts from Chinese chive juice (Allium tuberosum). In their HPLC-MS analysis these derivatives were called kaempferol diglucoside, or kaempferol sophoroside derivatives.
According to literature reports, kaempferol glucoside is the leading compound identified in extracts of the representatives of the genus Allium [30]. Its presence was also confirmed in the herein analyzed samples, although during the retention time of 17.5 min, the mass chromatograms also showed a smaller peak of the second kaempferol glucoside. Astragalin has a sugar attached at the 3-position to the aglycone backbone. In contrast, the second glucoside must differ in substitution to the main ring, but the scientific literature does not provide enough information to determine the second isomer. The 5- and 7-O-glycosides of kaempferol are found in nature, although it seems probable that the C-7 position of substitution is preferential for the representatives of Allium gender. 3,7-di-O-glucosides of kampferol were previously described in the scientific literature, e.g., in Allium macrostemon [30].

2.2. The GC-MS Identification of the Constituents of Diethyl Ether Extracts

Diethyl ether extracts obtained from bulbs and chives of A. galanthum and bulbs of A. turkestanicum were analyzed by use of GC-MS. The volatile components identified in the examined extracts are listed in Table 2 in order of their elution from ZB-5MS column. In total, 25, 22, and 17 compounds were identified in bulbs and chives of A. galanthum and bulbs of A. turkestanicum, respectively.
The most characteristic components present in all analyzed extracts are straight- and long-chain hydrocarbons and their alcohols. Hentriacontane with 31 carbons is the major component occurring in all three examined samples. Hentriacontane is a well-known alkane present in several plants of the family Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbia, Alteurites, Colliguaja) [31]. It also comprises about 10% beeswax [32]. Besides hentriacontane, the oxygenated long-chain saturated alkanes are characteristic for A. galanthum bulbs and chives. Bulbs produce mainly 1-octacosanol and 1-triacontalol, while chives 16-hentriacontanone (= palmitone) and 1-tritriacontanol. Another group of compounds found in these nonpolar extracts are fatty acids and their ethyl esters. Worth mentioning is the presence of linoleic acid only the bulbs of A. turkestanicum, while fatty acids ethyl esters in bulbs of A. galanthum. The next group of compounds identified in the analyzed extracts are sterols. All extracts contain 14-methylergost-8-en-3-ol, while in A. galanthum bulbs and chives cholesterol and an intermediate product of cholesterol, lathosterol. It seems very interesting to identify the cholesterol in A. galanthum, since there is a widespread belief that plants do not contain cholesterol–this is not true. Although the cholesterol concentration in plants is approximately several hundreds to thousands of times smaller than that of the animal tissues, it is not negligible [33,34]. It occurs as a compound building plant membranes and as a constituent of the surface lipids of leaves, where sometimes it may play a role of the major sterol [32,33,34].

2.3. The Determination of the Antimicrobial Activity of the Extracts

The best results of the antimicrobial activity test were obtained for the diethyl ether extracts contrary to the more polar water- and ethanol- containing ones. First, the study was performed for the bulb extracts only, although low MIC values that were obtained for the diethyl ether extracts encouraged the authors to check also the activity of AG chives. Table 3 compiles the results recorded for the diethyl ether extracts obtained from the bulbs and chives of AG and from the bulbs of AT.
As presented in Table 3, the diethyl ether extracts showed differential activity against tested reference bacteria (MIC = 0.125–4 mg/mL) and yeasts (MIC = 0.125–1 mg/mL). The ATb diethyl ether extract was characterized by a strong activity against bacteria (MIC = 0.125–1 mg/mL) and yeasts (MIC = 0.125–0.5 mg/mL). In contrast, a lower antimicrobial activity of the AGb diethyl ether extract (MIC = 0.25–4 mg/mL) was showed. However, the diethyl ether extract obtained from AGc was characterized by the higher activity and the lowest MIC values (MIC = 0.125–1 mg/mL), similar to ATb diethyl ether extract. All Gram-positive bacteria and yeasts were sensitive to diethyl ether extracts from onions of A. turkestanicum with MIC = 0.125–1 mg/mL and MIC = 0.125–0.5 mg/mL, respectively. The tested Gram-negative bacteria showed good sensitivity to the diethyl ether extracts from ATb and AGc at concentration 1 mg/mL.
These extracts exhibited strong effect towards Bacillus spp. ATCC (MIC = 0.125–0.25 mg/mL) and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (MIC = 0.5–1 mg/mL). Moreover, these extracts possessed strong properties against all tested Candida strains ATCC (MIC = 0.125–0.5 mg/mL).
In addition, water extracts and ethanol extracts (EtOH50%, EtOH70% and EtOH96%) obtained from AGb and ATb were also investigated for their antimicrobial properties (see Table 4 and Table 5). This study concluded that water extracts obtained from AG showed a weaker antimicrobial activity (for bacteria: MIC = 16–32 mg/mL and for yeasts: MIC = 8 mg/mL) compared to water extracts from AT (for bacteria: MIC = 4–16 mg/mL and for yeasts: MIC = 1–2 mg/mL) (Table 4 and Table 5).
The water extract and the 50% ethanol extract from AG had the same activity against bacteria (MIC = 16–32 mg/mL) and yeast (MIC = 8 mg/mL) (Table 4), in contrast to the AT extracts, where the 50% ethanol extract (EtOH50%) was more active than the water extract (Table 5). The activity of all ethanol extracts (EtOH50%, EtOH70%, EtOH96%) from both species against yeast did not differ much. Their MIC values were calculated as 8 mg/mL for AG and 0.5–1 mg/mL for AT. The EtOH70% and EtOH96% extracts did not differ in activity within the same bulb species. The ethanol extracts of AT showed 4–16 times better activity than the ethanol extracts from AGb on the basis of MIC values.
The MIC values calculated for the reference antimicrobial substances were as follows: MIC of vancomycin for S. aureus ATCC 29213 was 1 µg/mL, MIC of ciprofloxacin for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was 0.015 µg/mL and MIC of fluconazole for Candida albicans ATCC was 1 µg/mL.
According to the data presented in Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5, most of the extracts possessed bactericidal (MBC/MIC = 1–4) and fungicidal effect (MFC/MIC = 1–4). The antimicrobials are generally regarded as bactericidal or fungicidal agents if the MBC/MIC or MFC/MIC ratio is ≤4, and it is agreed that antimicrobials are usually regarded as bacteriostatic or fungistatic if the MBC/MIC or MFC/MIC ratio is >4 [35]. The bacteriostatic effect was noted with some diethyl ether extracts against some Gram-positive and some Gram-negative bacteria (MBC/MIC = 8).
In summary, in comparison with diethyl ether extracts, a lower antimicrobial activity of all ethanol and water extracts was shown by both AT and AG.
The highest microbiological activity of diethyl ether extracts from bulbs of A. turkestanicum was observed against B. subtilis ATCC 6633, B. cereus ATCC 10876, S. aureus ATCC 25923, S. epidermidis ATCC 12228 and all tested Candida species: C. albicans ATCC 2091, C. albicans ATCC 10231, C. glabrata ATCC 90030, C. krusei ATCC 14243 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019 (MIC = 0.125–0.5 mg/mL) as showed in the tables. High antifungal properties of diethyl ether extracts from AGb and ATb were also proved.
The obtained results indicate the possibility of various health benefits and practical use of diethyl ether extracts obtained from ATb and AGc in preparations for external use active against gram-positive bacteria, mainly S. aureus and in preparations for internal use in food poisoning caused by B. cereus, as well as against fungal infections mainly caused by Candida spp.
The observed higher activity of the diethyl ether extracts may be explained by the results elaborated during the GC-MS analysis. The studied samples contained the oxygenated long-chain saturated alkanes. Among them, 16-hentriacontanone (= palmitone) and 1-tritriacontanol were identified. Those metabolites were previously reported as active antimicrobial agents. The former compound was isolated from the leaf cuticular waxes obtained from Annona squamosal by Shiva Shanker and collaborators [36] as the major component. Their studies showed a higher antimicrobial potential of palmitone from other constituents of the wax. It is worth a note that Bacillus species tested in their study were especially sensitive to this component (MIC = 6.25 µg/mL), which is in accordance with the results of the herein presented assay. Furthermore, long chain primary alcohols, like 1-triacontanol and heptadecanol were previously proved to influence the antimicrobial properties of Solena amplexicaulis leaves, which was described by Chatterjee and co-investigators [37].
These constituents that were present in the unpolar extract could determine the total activity of the samples. Similarly, in the studies of Tomovic and co-investigators [38], the chloroform extract from Allium ursinum chives exhibited a significantly stronger antimicrobial action than methanol or water extracts. Chloroform extract from the chives was the most active against B. subtilis ATCC 6633 (MIC = 0.313 mg/mL), for B. cereus (MIC = 2.5 mg/mL) and S. aureus (MIC = 2.5 mg/mL).
The herein presented data show a marked antimicrobial potential of the studied extracts. Previously, Santas et al. [39] published the results of antimicrobial assay performed on three varieties of Allium cepa growing in Spain. Ethyl acetate extracts from the onions were stronger from water extracts, but the range of calculated MIC values was still 40− > 100 mg/mL.
Four years later, Bakht et al. [40] showed a similar activity ethanol extracts of A. cepa which did not inhibit the growth of B. subtilus, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and S. typhi at any concentrations. At a concentration 2 mg/disc, the water extracts were effective in inhibiting the growth of B. subtilus and K. pneumoniae. Ethanol extracts were not active against E. coli, and they inhibited the growth of C. albicans only at concentrations >1 mg/disc. Similar results were also shown by Hughes and Lawson [41], Bekenblia [42] and Chathradhyunthi et al. [43].
The activity of AT and AG extracts was also higher from those reported by Fredotovic et al. [44] for A. x cornutum and A. cepa (yellow and red variety) onion peel extract. Their recent publication presents the results of antimicrobial assay that was performed on the waste extracts from these two species. The reported MIC values for S. aureus were within the range of 7.8–500 mg/mL, for B. cereus: 125–500 mg/mL, for E. coli: 500–2000 mg/mL, for K. pneumoniae: 500− > 2000 mg/mL, and for C. albicans: 1000− > 2000 mg/mL.

2.4. The Assessment of the Antioxidant Activity of A. galanthum and A. turkestanicum Extracts

Extracts from bulbs, chieves and flowers of several Allium species are known for their significant antioxidant activity. Strong antioxidant potential was found to be related with sulfur-containing compounds and flavonoids [45].
The relationship between A. galanthum and A. turkestanicum extracts concentration and the percentage of neutralized DPPH and ABTS radicals is shown in the Supplementary Figures S2 and S3. Table 6 presents the antioxidant potential of the analyzed extracts displayed as Trolox equivalents per gram of dried extract weight. Interestingly, the most significant antioxidant activity in the DPPH scavenging assay was detected for diethyl ether extracts from A. galanthum bulbs (AGb_Eth), while diethyl ether extract from A. turkestanicum bulbs (ATb_Eth) was the most active in ABTS scavenging assay. Ethanol and water extracts were found to exhibit a weaker antioxidant potential.
The analysis of antioxidant properties of four Allium species grown in Italy, A. neapolitanum, A. roseum, A. sativum and A. subhirsutum, showed that the extracts from chives (leaves) and flowers possess higher antioxidant activity than bulb extracts. The antioxidant activity of Allium extracts directly correlated with the total polyphenolics content [46]. Similar observation was made for A. ursinum extracts: the phenolic content and antioxidant potential measured using DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays was also higher in chives than in bulb extracts [47].
Additionally, a higher antioxidant activity of unpolar chloroform Allium extracts, in comparison with aqueous or alcoholic extracts, was shown previously, for example for A. ursinum leaves [41].
The predominant components identified in AGb_Eth extract were aliphatic alcohols, which are more likely responsible for the superior antioxidant activity of this extract. Comparative analysis of milk thistle (Silybium marianum L.) seed oil showed that higher content of aliphatic alcohols in immature oil results in more significant antioxidant activity in DPPH and ABTS scavenging assays when compared with matured oil, containing about 30% less of these compounds. Triacontanol and dotriacontanol were major components of strongly antioxidant immature milk thistle oil [48]. These alcohols were also identified among predominant components of AGb_Eth extract.
Antioxidant activity of ATb_Eth extract might result from the presence of linoleic acid, which was not identified in AGb and AGc extracts. Plant oils, such as cacay oil, containing high amounts of linoleic acid (58.3%), were previously shown to display stronger antioxidant activity than cacay butter and coconut oil, with low linoleic acid content (16.8% and 6.1%, respectively) [49].

2.5. Tyrosinase Inhibition by A. galanthum and A. turkestanicum Extracts

Tyrosinase (EC. 1.14.18.1) is a key enzyme of melanogenesis, catalyzing the conversion of l-tyrosine to l-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA) and subsequently to dopaquinone. Several natural extracts and plant-derived compounds have been shown in previous years as effective tyrosinase inhibitors, and are used as active ingredients in cosmetics and medical ointments [50]. Mushroom tyrosinase inhibitory assay is the most widely used method to search for new tyrosinase inhibitors. However, due to the structural and functional differences between mushroom and mammalian enzymes, mushroom tyrosinase inhibitors are not always effective against mammalian tyrosinase [51]. For example, significant differences between mushroom and tyrosinase inhibitory activity were reported for Achillea biebersteinii extracts and isolated compounds [52].
AG and AT extracts were compared for their tyrosinase inhibtory activity using commercially available mushroom tyrosinase and B16F10 cell lysate, containing murine tyrosinase. Kojic acid was used in both assays as inhibitory control (Figure 2). Among A. galanthum chives extracts, extracts AGc_Et50% and AGc_75% were found to significantly inhibit murine tyrosinase and slightly activate mushroom enzyme (Figure 2A). Aqueous and ethanolic extracts from A. galanthum bulbs were not influencing tyrosinases activity, except of AGb_Et96% extract inhibiting mushroom tyrosinase by ca. 25% at 100 µg/mL (Figure 2B). The most active murine tyrosinase inhibitors were found in AGb_Eth extract, decreasing the activity of murine tyrosinase by 46% at 100 µg/mL (Figure 2D). Interestingly, aqueous extract from A. turkestanicum bulbs (ATb_H2O) increased the activity of murine tyrosinase (Figure 2C).
Tyrosinase inhibitory potential was previously described for other Allium species. A. nigrum L., and A. subhirsutum methanolic extracts from bulbs and aerial parts were found to inhibit mushroom tyrosinase [53]. Tyrosinase inhibitory activity was also shown for Allium scorodoprasum L. subsp. rotundum, but in this species the highest tyrosinase inhibitory potential was found for the flower extract [54].
Quercetin 4′-O-β-D-glucopyranoside and quercetin-3’-O-beta-D-glucoside are the two mushroom tyrosinase inhibitors isolated from methanolc extracts of A. cepa dried skin. The IC50 values for the first compound were 4.3 and 52.7 µM in assays with l-tyrosine or l-DOPA substrates, respectively. Quercetin-3’-O-beta-D-glucoside inhibited mushroom tyrosinase with an IC50 value of 6.5 µM using l-tyrosine and 48.5 µM using l-DOPA as substrates, respectively [55]. Quercetin-3’-O-beta-D-glucoside was also found to downregulate melanin biosynthesis in B16F10 melanoma cells with an IC50 value of 38.8 µM [55].
(S)-N-trans-feruloyloctopamine isolated from A. sativum skin was found as effectve mushroom tyrosinase inhibitor and decreased the relative melanin contents in a dose-dependent manner in the α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 cells. Molecular analysis revealed that this compound inhibits melanogenesis by down-regulating tyrosinase mRNA and protein expression levels [56].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Reagent grade absolute ethyl alcohol and ether used for the preparation of extracts, were purchased from Avantor Performance Materials (Gliwice, Poland). The solvents for HPLC-MS analyses (water, 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile) were manufactured by J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA).
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/high glucose, Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), Agaricus bisporus, mushroom tyrosinase 3,4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine (l-DOPA), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,20-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), Trolox, Triton X-100 and kojic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). K2S2O8 was obtained from Chempur (Piekary Slaskie, Poland). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Pan-Biotech (Aidenbach, Germany). B16F10 murine melanoma cell line (ATCC CRL-6475) was purchased from LGC Standards (Łomianki, Poland).

3.2. Plant Material

Plant material investigated in the present study represented the bulbs and chives of AG and the bulbs of AT. Both species were collected on the outskirts of Almaty (Kazakhstan). The collection of A. turkestanicum, growing on loamy soil, was carried out in clear sunny weather by hand, avoiding the ingress of foreign parts of the plant. Coordinates of the collection area near the village of Targap, Almaty region: W 43.29320031385285, E 75.50903320312501, at an altitude of 763 m above sea level. Collection and harvesting of wild raw materials of A. galanthum Kar. et Kir. in the phase of leaf formation in the mountainous part of the elevated valley to the north-west of the city of Almaty in the Kogaly tract of the Anrakai upland at an altitude of 1023 meters above sea level. The collected material was identified in the Department of Pharmacy at Kazakh National Medical University by Doctor Zuriyadda Sakipova and brought to the Department of Pharmacognosy of the Medical University of Lublin as fresh. The extracts were obtained immediately according to the protocol described below.

3.3. Extraction

Bulbs and green shoots were finely chopped and extracted using absolute ethanol, 70% ethanol, 50% ethanol and water by ultrasound-assisted maceration at room temperature for 30 minutes in three cycles, using a fresh portion of solvent every time (solid to liquid ratio: 1:10 w/v). The same extracts were joined, concentrated using a rotary evaporator to dryness at a temperature not exceeding 45 °C, and kept in the freezer at −20 °C before the bioactivity and compositional studies. Prior to HPLC-MS analyses, the extracts were resuspeded in methanol to a concentration of 10 mg/mL and filtered through a syringe filter with a pore size of 0.22 µm (CronusFilters, Camberley, UK). The diethyl ether extracts were obtained by crushing the finely cut material with a pistle in a mortar together with the solvent for 5 min. The obtained extract was passed through a small glass column filled with silica gel (NP silica gel 60, 0.063–0.200, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) bed to remove water, and left opened in a weighted vial for evaporation. Dried residue was used for biological studies, while for the GC-MS based compositional study, the dry extract was re-dissolved in diethyl ether to the concentration of 20 mg/mL.

3.4. HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS Analysis of Extracts from Bulbs and Chives of A. galanthum and Bulbs of A. turkestanicum

The chromatographic analysis was performed using an HPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS platform composed of a mass spectrometer (6500 Series Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and an HPLC system (1200 Series, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and using Zorbax Eclipse Plus RP 18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, dp = 3.5 µm) manufactured by Agilent Technologies. In details, the set was equipped with a binary pump (G1312C), a degasser (G1322A), a PDA detector (G1315D) and an autosampler (G1329B). Specific parameters of chromatographic determinations, were as follows: the flow rate 0.2 mL/min, the thermostat temperature 20 °C, the injection volume 20 µL, the UV detection range of 190–600 nm, the DAD detection at 280 and 320 nm, the run time of 55 min, the composition of the mobile phase: solvent A, 0.1% aqueous solution of formic acid, solvent B, 0.1% of formic acid in acetonitrile; the gradient of B: 0 min 1% B, 2 min 15% B, 40 min 40% B, 45 min 95% B, 47 min 1% B.
Mass spectra that were recorded in both positive and negative ionization modes and within the m/z range of 50–1200 Da were obtained using the following mass spectrometer settings: the capillary voltage of 3.5 kV, gas flows of 12 L/min, voltage of 120 V, gas and sheath gas temperatures of 350 and 325 °C, respectively, fragmentation skimmer voltage of 65 V and the collision energies of 10 and 20 V. In the prepared method, the MS/MS fragmentation spectra were obtained for the two most intense m/z signals in every scan. After the collection of one MS/MS spectrum, the selected m/z signals were later excluded for the following 0.2 min from re-fragmenting. Thanks to the applied conditions, the less-intensive signals could be also fragmented. The identification of the components in the extracts was based on their fragmentation spectra, in a direct comparison with the solutions of standards, based on the analysis literature data and open databases (Metlin), and on the recorded retention times.

3.5. The GC-MS Analysis of Diethyl Ether Extracts

The GC–MS analysis of volatiles present in extracts was performed with a Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus GC instrument coupled with a Shimadzu QP2010 Ultra mass spectrometer (Kyoto, Japan). The analytes were separated on a ZB-5 MS capilary column (30 m, 0.25 mm i.d.) with a film thickness of 0.25 m (Phenomenex, Torrrance, CA, USA). The oven temperature program was as follows: 50 °C initially for 3 min, increased to 250 °C at 5 °C/min, and held for 5 min; and finally the temperature was increased to 320 °C at the rate of 10 °C/min and held for 5 min. The total time of analysis was 60 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas of 1.0 mL/min flow rate. A split injection was performed with a split ratio of 1:20. The injector port, interface and ion source temperatures were kept at 280, 250 and 220 °C, respectively. The spectrometer was operated in the electron impact mode, the scan range was 40–600 amu, the ionization energy was 70 eV and the scan rate was 0.20 s per scan. The retention indices were determined by analyzing a solution containing the homologous series of n-alkanes (C8–C34) under the same operating conditions. Compounds were identified using computer-assisted spectral libraries (MassFinder 2.1; NIST 2011).

3.6. The Antibacterial Assay In Vitro

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the extracts obtained from Allium galathum and A. turkestanicum for seventeen reference strains American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), including seven Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, S. aureus ATCC 25923, S. aureus ATCC 29213, S. aureus ATCC BAA 1707, B. subtilis ATCC 6633, B. cereus ATCC 10876, M. luteus ATCC 10240) and five Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli ATCC 25922, S. typhimurium ATCC 14028, K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883, B. bronchiseptica ATCC 4617, P. mirabilis ATCC 12453) and five yeasts (C. albicans ATCC 2091, C. albicans ATCC 10231, C. glabrata ATCC 90030, C. krusei ATCC 14243, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019) was performed by the microdilution broth method according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [35]. Minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) or minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) was also determined. The antimicrobial studies were performed as described previously [57]. Briefly, the stock solutions of extracts were prepared in a diluted solution of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) that did not exceed 2% in the final mixture.
Each experiment was repeated in triplicate. The most common representative data were presented of the three MIC and MBC or MFC values, i.e., the mode.
The standard chemotherapeutics agents: vancomycin (Va; range of 0.06–16 μg/mL), ciprofloxacin (CIP; range of 0.015–16 μg/mL), and fluconazole (FLU; range of 0.06–16 μg/mL were used as antimicrobial substances active against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts.

3.7. The DPPH Scavenging Assay

DPPH radical scavenging assay was performed according to the procedure described by Matejic et al. [58], with modifications. 50 μL of appropriately diluted extract (1.2 mg/mL, 0.6 mg/mL, 0.3 mg/mL, 0.15 mg/mL, 0.075 mg/mL, 0.0375 mg/mL, 0.01875 mg/mL, 0.00938 mg/mL, 0.00469 mg/mL, 0.00234 mg/mL, 0.00117 mg/mL and 0.00059 mg/mL) were mixed with 50 μL DPPH working solution (25 mM in 99.9% methanol; A540 ≈ 1). 50 μL of solvent mixed with 50 μL DPPH served as a control sample. Following 10 min incubation at room temperature in darkness, the absorbance of the samples was measured at λ = 540 nm using FilterMax F5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The measured values of measurements were corrected by the absorbance value of the sample without DPPH. The percentage of DPPH radical neutralization was calculated using the following Equation
% of DPPH˙ scavenging = (1−(Abs(S)/Abs(C))) × 100
where Abs(S)-the corrected absorbance of the extract, Abs(C)-the corrected absorbance of the control sample (DPPH + solvent).
The analysis was conducted in three independent repetitions, using vitamin C as a reference compound. The calibration curve (y = −0.1241x + 0.24; R2 = 0.9974) was prepared using 0–1 mg/mL trolox. The content of total antioxidants in each sample was calculated as miligrams of trolox equivalents per gram of dried extract weight (TE/g dw).

3.8. ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay

ABTS radical scavenging assay was preformed according to the protocol described by Re and co-workers [59] with modifications. ABTS working solution was prepared by mixing 7 mM ABTS in 2.45 mM K2S2O8 with distilled H2O in order to obtain A405 ≈ 1.15 μL of diluted extracts (1.2 mg/mL, 0.6 mg/mL, 0.3 mg/mL, 0.15 mg/mL, 0.075 mg/mL, 0.0375 mg/mL, 0.01875 mg/mL, 0.00938 mg/mL, 0.00469 mg/mL, 0.00234 mg/mL, 0.00117 mg/mL and 0.00059 mg/mL) were mixed with 135 μL ABTS working solution. 15 μL of solvents mixed with 135 μL ABTS were used as control samples. The absorbance of the samples was measured at λ = 405 nm using FilterMax F5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) following 15 min of incubation at room temperature in darkness. The measured values were corrected by the absorbance value of the sample without ABTS. The percentage of ABTS radical scavenging was calculated based on the following Equation
% of ABTS scavenging = (1 − (Abs(S)/Abs(C))) × 100
where Abs(S)—the corrected absorbance of the extract, and Abs(C)the corrected absorbance of the control sample (ABTS + solvent).
The analysis was conducted in three independent repetitions, using vitamin C as a reference compound. The calibration curve (y = −187.01x + 0.3589; R2 = 0.9992) was prepared using 0–1 mg/mL trolox. The content of total antioxidants in each sample was calculated as miligrams of trolox equivalents per gram of dried extract weight (TE/g dw).

3.9. Mushroom Tyrosinase Inhibitory Assay

In order to assess the inhibition of the monophenolase activity of mushroom tyrosinase by Allium sp. extracts, the protocol described by Wang and co-workers was applied [60]. 20 µL of diluted sample was mixed with 80 µL of phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH = 6.8) was mixed with 80 µL of phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH = 6.8) and 20 µL mushroom tyrosinase working solution (500 U). The samples were pre-incubated for 10 min at room temperature, 80 µL 2 mM L-tyrosine was added and the samples were incubated for further 20 min at room temperature, in darkness. The method described by Uchida et al. [61] was implicated to analyze the inhibition of the diphenolase activity of mushroom tyrosinase. 20 µL of diluted sample was mixed with 120 µL of phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH = 6.8) and 20 µL tyrosinase solution (500 U). The samples were pre-incubated for 10 min at room temperature, then 40 µL 4 mM l-DOPA was added and the samples were incubated for a further 20 min at room temperature, in darkness. In both analyses the absorbance of formed dopachrome was measured using FilterMax F5 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) at λ = 450 nm. The obtained values were corrected by the absorbance of the extracts without tyrosinase and the substrate (L-tyrosine or l-DOPA). Control sample (100% tyrosinase activity) was composed of phosphate buffer, tyrosinase, substrate and equal volume of the solvent. 100 µg/mL kojic acid was used as a reference tyrosinase inhibitor. Tyrosinase was calculated based on the Equation
% of tyrosinase activity = (Abs(S)/Abs(C)) × 100%
where Abs(S)—the absorbance of the sample (extract + tyrosinase + substrate), and Abs(C)—the absorbance of the control sample (solvent + tyrosinase + substrate). Each sample was analyzed in three independent repetitions.

3.10. Murine Tyrosinase Inhibitory Assay

Murine tyrosinase inhibition by Allium sp. extracts was analysed using B16F10 murine melanoma cell lysate, as described by Uchida et al. with modifications [61]. B16F10 were cultured in DMEM high glucose supplemented with 10% FBS in humidified atmosphere at 37 °C and 5% CO2. 8 × 106 cells were lysed in 5 mL phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 6.8) containing 1% Triton X-100 in a sonicator ice cold water bath for one hour. Following centrifugation (10 min, 13 000 rpm), the supernatant was collected as murine tyrosinase solution and the protein concentration was measured using a DC Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Warsaw, Poland). The volume of cell lysate containing 20 µg protein was mixed with 20 µL of Allium sp. extract, 40 µL 4 mM l-DOPA, and 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.8 (up to 200 µL). The absorbance at λ = 450 nm was measured following four hours of incubation at 37 °C. Kojic acid was used as a known tyrosinase inhibitor control. The activity of tyrosinase was calculated based on the Equation (3).

3.11. Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). The statistical significance between results was assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test. All data are showed as mean ± SD. The experiments were conducted in at least three repetitions.

4. Conclusions

The performed studies show a rich composition of the studied extracts of different polarity that were obtained from the bulbs and chives of A. galanthum and bulbs of A. turkestanicum growing in Kazakhstan. Flavonoids and their glucosides, organic acids, long-chain oxygenated saturated alkanes, fatty acids, ethyl esters of fatty acids and sterols were found in the tested plant material. The analyzed unpolar diethyl ether extracts were found to exhibit stronger biological activity in comparison with water and water-ethanol extracts of different ratios. The first extracts were found to be strong antimicrobial agents not only against the tested Gram-positive bacteria, but also inhibited the growth of several strains of Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts possibly due to the presence of 16-hentriacontanone (= palmitone) and 1-tritriacontanol among other constituents of the extracts. The presence of flavonoids, oxygenated long-chain alkanes and alkohols was certainly influencing an increased antiradical potential of the extracts. The highest potential was measured for diethyl ether extracts from chives of AG and bulbs of AT. The AG bulb diethyl ether extracts were also proved to inhibit murine tyrosinase until 54% of its activity, which can confirm its promising whitening properties.
The development of the cosmetics market, dictated by an increased awareness of consumers, breach the production of high-value cosmetics-devoid of toxic ingredients, based on recipes containing compounds of natural origin. In line with these trends, it is necessary to search for new cosmetic ingredients that will protect the skin against harmful, skin irritating and oxidative stress-inducing factors to improve its condition.
So far, only the extract from the bulbs of A. cepa is registered in the CosIng database (EU’s Iventory of Cosmetic Ingredients) as a safe cosmetic ingredient suitable for antimicrobial, anti-dandruff, anti-ageing, antioxidant, emollient and conditioning products. It is worth noting that a constantly growing number of scientific publications also confirm the same properties for other Allium spp., including the herein studied Kazakh species. The ability of onion extracts to inhibit the activity of the enzyme associated with skin discoloration - tyrosinase, confirmed by the above-described tests, is certainly of great value. The confirmed antiradical properties of the tested extracts when added to cosmetics could exhibit soothing properties against the negative impact of the environmental stressors that influence the skin function and results with an increased generation of reactive oxygen species. Finally, the antimicrobial potential of the tested samples will be important for preserving the cosmetic product, but also for inhibiting the development of bacterial infections on the surface of the skin exposed to irritation and acne.
To conclude, the herein described results of the conducted survey strongly support the application of A. turkestanicum and A. galanthum extracts in cosmetics.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online, Figure S1: Mass chromatograms recorded for 50% ethanol extracts of Kazakhstani bulbs (top: Allium galanthum onion extract in negative ion mode, in positive ion mode, Allium galanthum chives extract in negative ion mode, in positive ion mode, Allium turkestanicum onion extract in positive ion mode, in negative ion mode); Table S1: The MS/MS fragmentation spectra of the identified compounds; Figure S2: Scavenging of DPPH free radical by A. galanthus and A. turkestanicum extracts; graphs show mean ± SD (n = 3); Figure S3. Scavenging of ABTS free radical by A. galanthus and A. turkestanicum extracts; graphs show mean ± SD (n = 3); Table S2. The list of screened compounds during the compositional studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.K.-K., A.G. and K.G.-B.; methodology, W.K.-K., A.G., A.L. and K.G.-B.; software, J.Z., W.K.-K., A.L. and W.K.; formal analysis, G.K., J.Z., A.G., M.S.-G., K.C., A.L., M.K. and W.K.-K.; investigation, G.K., J.Z., Z.S. and W.K.-K.; resources, G.K. and Z.S.; data curation, W.K., A.M., K.G. and Z.S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.K., J.Z., A.G., K.G.-B., A.L. and Z.S.; writing—review and editing, M.K., K.G., Z.S. and W.K.-K.; supervision, K.G.-B., W.K., K.G., Z.S. and W.K.-K.; project administration, W.K.-K.; and funding acquisition, G.K., Z.S., K.G.-B., A.M., Z.S. and W.K.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the statutory funds of the Medical University of Lublin—DS 26(W.K.-K.), DS 28 (A.L.) and DS 30 (A.M.), and by the statutory project of the University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszów, Poland (DS 503-07-01-38).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the results are present in the manuscript and in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the plant material are available from the authors.

References

  1. Fritsch, R.M.; Blattner, F.R.; Gurushidze, M. New classification of Allium, L. subg. Melanocrommyum (Webb & Berthel) Rouy (Alliaceae) based on molecular and morphological characters. Phyton 2010, 49, 145–220. [Google Scholar]
  2. Li, Q.Q.; Zhou, S.D.; He, X.J.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.C.; Wei, X.Q. Phylogeny and biogeography of Allium (Amaryllidaceae: Allieae) based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer and chloroplast rps16 sequences, focusing on the inclusion of species endemic to China. Ann. Bot. 2010, 106, 709–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. De Wilde-Duyfjes, B.E.E. A revision of the genus Allium L. (Liliaceae) in Africa. Belmontia 1976, 7, 75–78. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rachkovskaya, E.I.; Volkova, E.A.; Khramtsov, V.N. Botanical Geography of Kazakhstan and Central Asia (within the Desert Region); Russian Academy of Sciences: St. Petersburg, Russia, 2003; 423p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Available online: http://www.agroatlas.ru/en/content/related/Allium_galanthum/ (accessed on 3 June 2021).
  6. Gurushidze, M.; Mashayekhi, S.; Blattner, F.R.; Friesen, N.; Fritsch, R.M. Phylogenetic relationships of wild and cultivated species of Allium section Cepa inferred by nuclear rDNA ITS sequence analysis. Plant Syst. Evol. 2007, 269, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Available online: http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=200027481 (accessed on 2 July 2021).
  8. Available online: https://pfaf.org/user/Plant.aspx?LatinName=Allium+galanthum (accessed on 3 June 2021).
  9. Available online: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:529068-1 (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  10. Plantarium, an Open Online Atlas of Plants and Lichens in Russia and Neighboring Countries. Available online: http://www.plantarium.ru (accessed on 3 June 2021).
  11. Block, E. Die Organoschwefelchemie der gattung Allium und ihre bedeutung für die organische chemie des schwefels. Angew. Chem. 1992, 104, 1158–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koch, H.P.; Lawson, L.D. Garlic. In The Science and Therapeutic Application of Allium sativum L. and Related Species; Williams &Wilkins: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  13. Keusgen, M. Biosensorische Methoden zur Quantitativen Bestimmung von Cysteinsulfoxiden, Berichte aus der Pharmazie; Wyd. Shaker-Verlag: Aachen, Germany, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fritsch, R.M.; Keusgen, M. Occurrence and taxonomic significance of cysteine sulphoxides in the genus Allium, L. (Alliaceae). Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1127–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Beniaich, G.; Salim, R.; Ech-Chihbi, E.; El-Hajjaji, F.; Rais, Z.; Abdellaoui, A.; Taleb, M. Ethnobotanical survey about medicinal plants used in traditional treatment of insomnia, asthenia, and oral and gum infections in the region Fez-Meknes, Morocco. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gao, C.M.; Takezaki, T.; Ding, J.H.; Li, M.S.; Taijima, K. Protective effect of Allium vegetables against both esophageal and stomach cancer: A simultaneous case-referent study of high-epidemic area in Jiangsu province, China. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1999, 90, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Perez-Gregorio, M.R.; Garcia-Falcon, M.S.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Almeida, D.P.F. Identification and quantification of flavonoids in traditional cultivars of red and white onions at harvest. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2010, 23, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kothari, D.; Lee, W.-D.; Kim, S.-K. Allium flavonols: Health benefits, molecular targets, and bioavailability. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nikkhahi, M.; Souri, E.; Sarkhail, P.; Baeeri, M.; Mohammadhosseini, N. Evaluation of anti-tyrosinase activity of Allium ursinum extracts and their metal complexes. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2018, 17, 219–226. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rocchetti, G.; Zhang, L.; Bocchi, S.; Giuberti, G.; Ak, G.; Elbasan, F.; Yıldıztugay, E.; Ceylan, R.; Picot-Allain, M.C.N.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; et al. The functional potential of nine Allium species related to their untargeted phytochemical characterization, antioxidant capacity and enzyme inhibitory ability. Food Chem. 2021, 368, 130782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Phetmanee, T.; Wunnakup, T.; Lukkunaprasit, T.; Madaka, F.; Settharaksa, S.; Kamkaen, N.; Vipunnqeun, N.; Charoenchai, L. Anti-tyrosinase and anti-melanogenic potential of shallots (Allium ascalonicum) from various cultivation sites in Thailand. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 44, 107–116. [Google Scholar]
  22. Abdykerimova, S.; Sakipova, Z.; Nakonieczna, S.; Koch, W.; Biernasiuk, A.; Grabarska, A.; Malm, A.; Kozhanova, K.; Kukula-Koch, W. Superior antioxidant capacity of berberis iliensis—HPLC-Q-TOF-MS based phytochemical studies and spectrophotometric determinations. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Niu, K.-M.; Kothari, D.; Lee, W.-D.; Cho, S.; Wu, X.; Kim, S.-K. Optimization of Chinese chive juice as a functional feed additive. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Slimestad, R.; Fossen, T.; Vågen, I.M. Onions: A source of unique dietary flavonoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 10067–10080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jaitz, L.; Mueller, B.; Koellensperger, G.; Huber, D.; Oburger, E.; Puschenreiter, M.; Hann, S. LC-MS analysis of low molecular weight organic acids derived from root exudation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 400, 2587–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Vijayalakshmi, G.; Raja, M.; Naik, M.; Lakshmipathi, M.; Carbone, V.; Russo, G.L.; Khan, P.S.V. Determination of antioxidant capacity and flavonoid composition of onion (Allium cepa L.) landrace ‘Krishnapuram’ bulb using HPLC-ESI-ITMS. J. Biosci. 2021, 46, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Abad-García, B.; Garmón-Lobato, S.; Berrueta, L.A.; Gallo, B.; Vicente, F. A fragmentation study of dihydroquercetin using triple quadrupole mass spectrometry and its application for identification of dihydroflavonols in Citrus juices. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23, 2785–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Szwajgier, D.; Baranowska-Wójcik, E.; Kukula-Koch, W.; Kowalik, K.; Polak-Berecka, E.; Waśko, A. Evolution of the anticholinesterase, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity of Epilobium angustifolium L. infusion during in vitro digestion. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 85, 104645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dabeek, W.M.; Kovinich, N.; Walsh, C.; Ventura Marra, M. Characterization and quantification of major flavonol glycosides in ramps (Allium tricoccum). Molecules 2019, 24, 3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Nakane, R.; Iwashina, T. Flavonol glycosides from the leaves of Allium macrostemon. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2015, 10, 1381–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Meyre-Silva, C.; Mora, T.C.; Biavatti, M.W.; Santos, A.R.S.; Dal-Margo, J.; Yunes, R.A.; Cechinel-Filho, V. Preliminary phytochemical and pharmacological studies of Aleurites moluccana leaves (L.) Wild. Phytomedicine 1995, 5, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Svečnjak, L.; Chesson, L.A.; Gallina, A.; Maia, M.; Martinello, M.; Mutinelli, F.; Necati Muz, M.; Nunes, F.M.; Saucy, F.; Tipple, B.J.; et al. Standard methods for Apis mellifera beeswax research. J. Apicult. Res. 2019, 58, 1–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Behrman, E.J.; Gopalan, V. Cholesterol and plants. J. Chem. Educ. 2005, 82, 1791–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sonawane, P.D.; Pollier, J.; Panda, S.; Szymanski, J.; Massalha, H.; Yona, M.; Unger, T.; Malitsky, S.; Arendt, P.; Pauwels, L.; et al. Plant cholesterol biosynthetic pathway overlaps with phytosterol metabolism. Nat. Plants 2016, 3, 16205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID). Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by broth dilution. Clin. Microbiol. Inf. Dis. 2003, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Shanker, K.S.; Kanjilal, S.; Rao, B.V.; Kishore, K.H.; Misra, S.; Prasad, R.B. Isolation and antimicrobial evaluation of isomeric hydroxy ketones in leaf cuticular waxes of Annona squamosa. Phytochem. Anal. 2007, 18, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chatterjee, S.; Karmakar, A.; Azmi, S.A.; Barik, A. Antibacterial activity of long-chain primary alcohols from solena amplexicaulis leaves. Proc. Zool. Soc. 2018, 71, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tomovic, M.T.; Krivokapic, M.Z.; Jakovljevic, V.L.; Sovrlic, M.M.; Bradic, J.V.; Petkovic, A.M.; Radojevic, I.D.; Brankovic, S.R.; Comic, L.R.; Andjic, M.M.; et al. Biological activities of different extracts from Allium ursinum leaves. Acta Pol. Pharm. 2020, 77, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Santas, J.; Almajano, M.P.; Carbó, R. Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of crude onion (Allium cepa, L.) extracts. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 403–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bakht, J.; Khan, S.; Shafi, M. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Allium cepa (dry bulbs) against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria and fungi. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 27, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hughes, B.G.; Lawson, L.D. Antimicrobial effects of Allium sativam, Allium ampeloprasum and Allium cepa. Phytother. Res. 1991, 5, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Benkeblia, N. Antimicrobial activity of essential oil extracts of various onions (Allium cepa) and Garlic (Allium sativam). LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 37, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chaithradhyuthi, G.S.; Sowmya, P.S.; Shwetha, B.R.; Gowri, S.; Bhat, P.R.; Nagasapige, H.M.; Rao, B.R. Evaluation of the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of some members of Allium. Electr. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 8, 345–350. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fredotović, Ž.; Puizina, J.; Nazlić, M.; Maravić, A.; Ljubenkov, I.; Soldo, B.; Vuko, E.; Bajić, D. Phytochemical characterization and screening of antioxidant, antimicrobial and antiproliferative properties of Allium × cornutum clementi and two varieties of Allium cepa L. peel extracts. Plants 2021, 10, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fredotovic, Ž.; Puizina, J. Edible Allium species: Chemical composition, biological activity and health effects. Ital. J. Food Sci. 2019, 31, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nencini, C.; Cavallo, F.; Capasso, A.; Franchi, G.G.; Giorgio, G.; Micheli, L. Evaluation of antioxidative properties of Allium species growing wild in Italy. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 874–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lachowicz, S.; Kolniak-Ostek, J.; Oszmianski, J.; Wiśniewski, R. Comparison of phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of bear garlic (Allium ursinum L.) in different maturity stages. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2017, 41, e12921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Harrabi, S.; Ferchichi, A.; Bacheli, A.; Fellah, H. Policosanol composition, antioxidant and anti-arthritic activities of milk thistle (Silybium marianum L.) oil at different seed maturity stages. Lipids Health Dis. 2018, 16, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Medeiros de Azevedo, W.; Ferreira Ribeiro de Oliveira, L.; Alves Alcântara, M.; Tribuzy de Magalhães Cordeiro, A.M.; Florentino da Silva Chaves Damasceno, K.S.; Kelly de Araújo, N.; Fernandes de Assis, C.; Sousa Junior, F.C. Physicochemical characterization, fatty acid profile, antioxidant activity and antibacterial potential of cacay oil, coconut oil and cacay butter. PLoS ONE 2020, 28, e0232224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zolghadri, S.; Bahrami, A.; Hassan Khan, M.T.; Munoz-Munoz, J.; Garcia-Molina, F.; Garcia-Canovas, F.; Saboury, A.A. A comprehensive review on tyrosinase inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019, 34, 279–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pillaiyar, T.; Manickam, M.; Namasivayam, V. Skin whitening agents: Medicinal chemistry perspective of tyrosinase inhibitors. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2017, 32, 403–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Strzępek-Gomółka, M.; Gaweł-Bęben, K.; Angelis, A.; Antosiewicz, B.; Sakipova, Z.; Kozhanova, K.; Głowniak, K.; Kukula-Koch, W. Identification of Mushroom and Murine Tyrosinase Inhibitors from Achillea biebersteinii Afan. Extract. Molecules 2021, 26, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Emir, A.; Emir, C.; Yıldırım, H. Characterization of phenolic profile by LC-ESI-MS/MS and enzyme inhibitory activities of two wild edible garlic: Allium nigrum L. and Allium subhirsutum L. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mollica, A.; Zengin, G.; Locatelli, M.; Picot-Allain, C.M.N.; Mahomoodally, M.F. Multidirectional investigations on different parts of Allium scorodoprasum L. subsp. rotundum (L.) Stearn: Phenolic components, in vitro biological, and in silico propensities. Food Res. Int. 2018, 108, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Arung, E.T.; Furuta, S.; Ishikawa, H.; Tanaka, H.; Shimizu, K.; Kondo, R. Melanin biosynthesis inhibitory and antioxidant activities of quercetin-3’-O-beta-D-glucoside isolated from Allium cepa. Z. Nat. C 2011, 66, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wu, Y.; Wu, Z.R.; Chen, P.; Li, Y.; Deng, W.R.; Wang, Y.Q.; Li, H.Y. Effect of the tyrosinase inhibitor (S)-N-trans-feruloyloctopamine from garlic skin on tyrosinase gene expression and melanine accumulation in melanoma cells. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 1476–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Malm, A.; Grzegorczyk, A.; Biernasiuk, A.; Baj, T.; Rój, E.; Tyśkiewicz, K.; Dębczak, A.; Stolarski, M.J.; Krzyżaniak, M.; Olba-Zięty, E. Could supercritical extracts from the aerial parts of Helianthus salicifolius A. Dietr. and Helianthus tuberosus L. be regarded as potential raw materials for biocidal purposes? Agriculture 2021, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Matejic, J.S.; Dzamic, A.M.; Mihajilov-Krstev, T.; Randelovic, V.N.; Krivosej, Z.D.; Marin, P.D. Total phenolic content, flavonoid concentration, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of methanol extracts from three Seseli, L. taxa. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2012, 7, 1116–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Y.; Hao, M.-M.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.-F.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Li, H.-Y.; Zhuang, P.-W.; Yang, Z. Synergistic Promotion on Tyrosinase Inhibition by Antioxidants. Molecules 2018, 23, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Uchida, R.; Ishikawa, S.; Tomoda, H. Inhibition of tyrosinase activity and melanin pigmentation by 2-hydroxytyrosol. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2014, 4, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Mass chromatograms recorded in the negative ion mode for 50% ethanol extracts of Kazakhstani bulbs (top: Allium galanthum bulb extract (AGb), Allium galanthum chives extract (AGc), Allium turkestanicum bulb extract (ATb)).
Figure 1. Mass chromatograms recorded in the negative ion mode for 50% ethanol extracts of Kazakhstani bulbs (top: Allium galanthum bulb extract (AGb), Allium galanthum chives extract (AGc), Allium turkestanicum bulb extract (ATb)).
Molecules 26 05491 g001
Figure 2. Mushroom and murine tyrosinase inhibitory activity of A. galanthus chives (A) and bulbs (B) (AGc and AGb, respectively), A. turkestanicum bulbs (ATb) (C) and diethyl ether extracts from AGc, AGb and ATb (D) extracts at 100 µg/mL in comparison with 100 g/mL kojic acid; values on graphs represent mean ± SD (n = 3), *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Mushroom and murine tyrosinase inhibitory activity of A. galanthus chives (A) and bulbs (B) (AGc and AGb, respectively), A. turkestanicum bulbs (ATb) (C) and diethyl ether extracts from AGc, AGb and ATb (D) extracts at 100 µg/mL in comparison with 100 g/mL kojic acid; values on graphs represent mean ± SD (n = 3), *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05.
Molecules 26 05491 g002
Table 1. The list of detected metabolites in the 50% ethanol extracts from different organs of Kazakhstani onions—Allium galanthum and Allium turkestanicum (AGb, AGb, ATb).
Table 1. The list of detected metabolites in the 50% ethanol extracts from different organs of Kazakhstani onions—Allium galanthum and Allium turkestanicum (AGb, AGb, ATb).
No.Ion SpeciesRtMolecular Formulam/z Calculatedm/z ExperimentalΔppm RDBMS/MS FragmentsProposed CompoundRef.AGbAGcATb
1[M−H] 2.7C6H8O7191.0197191.0209−6.113129, 111Citric acid[22]+++
2[M−H] 8.2C33H40O22787.1938787.1986−6.0314625, 463, 301Quercetin triglycoside[23]++
3[M−H] 8.7C21H22O12465.1038465.1067−6.1111303, 285Taxifolin glucoside[24]+++Tr
4[M−H] 9.15C7H12O5175.0612175.0623−6.262157, 115Propylmalic acid[25]+++
5[M−H] 10.4C27H30O17625.1410625.1463−8.4313463, 301Quercetin dihexoside[23]+++++
6[M−H] 10.5C27H30O16609.1461609.1515−8.8413446, 283Kaempferol diglucoside[23]++++
7[M−H] 11.6C27H30O16609.1461609.1495−5.5613446, 285Kaempferol diglucoside[23]++++
8[M−H] 13.1C21H21O11+449.1089449.1109−4.3711287Cyanidin glucoside[26]+TrTr
9[M−H] 15.0C41H72O10+723.5053723.5097−6.116677, 255Unknown 1 +++++
10[M−H] 16.0C15H12O7303.0510303.04819.6210285Dihydroquercetin[27]++Tr
11[M−H] 16.9C28H32O17639.1567639.1573−0.9813315Isorhamnetin diglucoside[26]++Tr
12[M−H] 18.4C55H80O6836.596836.59451.8415.5790, 483Unknown 2 +++++
13[M−H] 18.7C21H20O12463.0882463.0907−5.3912301, 151Isoquercetin[22]+++++
14[M−H] 19.8C21H20O11447.0933447.08948.6712284, 174Kaempferol glucoside[28]++
15[M−H] 20.8C22H22O12477.1038477.1041−0.5212314Isorhamnetin glucoside[26]++++Tr
16[M−H] 29.6C15H10O7301.0354301.0381−9.0211Quercetin[22]+ ++ +
17[M−H] 35.5C15H10O6285.0405285.03914.7611Kaempferol[29]+++-
(Ion—type of ionization, Rt—retention time in minutes, RDB—ring and double bond equivalent, Ref—references, Δppm—the error of measurement expressed in mmu, AGb—Allium galanthum bulbs, AGc—Allium galanthum chives, ATb—Allium turkestanicum bulbs, Tr—traces, + detected, − not detected. The intensity of the peaks is marked with the number of pluses, namely ++ the peaks with 105 intensity and + with 104 intensity).
Table 2. The list of compounds identified in diethyl ether extracts of Kazakhstani onions—Allium galanthum and Allium turkestanicum after their analysis by GC-MS method.
Table 2. The list of compounds identified in diethyl ether extracts of Kazakhstani onions—Allium galanthum and Allium turkestanicum after their analysis by GC-MS method.
No.Compound NameMolecular FormulaRI*AGbAGcATb
1NonanalC9H18O1106+
2Neophytadiene (isomer II)C20H381836 +
3Hexadecanoic acidC16H32O21968+++
4Hexadecanoic acid ethyl esterC18H36O21992+
53,13-Octadecadien-1-olC18H34O2094+ +
6Linoleic acidC18H32O22146 ++
7Linoleic acid ethyl esterC20H36O22162+
8Oleic acid ethyl esterC20H38O22168+
9TetracosaneC24H502402+++
101-TetracosanolC24H50O2475+
11PentacosaneC25H522502+++
12HexacosaneC26H542603+++
131-HexacosanolC26H54O2681+++
14HeptacosaneC27H562703+++
15Tetracosanoic acid ethyl esterC26H52O22798+
16OctacosaneC28H582801 +
17SqualeneC30H502815+++
181-OctacosanolC28H58O2882+++++
19NonacosaneC29H602904+++
20TriacontaneC30H623003+++
211-TriacontanolC30H62O3084++++++
22HentriacontaneC31H643105+++++++++
23CholesterolC27H46O3147++
24DotriacontaneC32H663204++
25LathosterolC27H46O3210++
2614-Methylergost-8-en-3-olC29H50O3226+++
271,30-TriacontanediolC30H62O23251 +
281-DotriacontanolC32H66O3285+++
2916-HentriacontanoneC31H62O3293 ++++
30TritriacontaneC33H683305++++
311-TritriacontanolC33H68O3382 +++
RI*—retention index relative to n-alkane series; the relative content of identified compounds was indicated as high (+++), moderate (++) or low (+) based on the peak area.
Table 3. MIC (mg/mL) and MBC (mg/mL) and MFC (mg/mL) values of dried ether extracts obtained from two Kazakh species of onions-Allium galanthum and Allium turkestanicum against the reference strains.
Table 3. MIC (mg/mL) and MBC (mg/mL) and MFC (mg/mL) values of dried ether extracts obtained from two Kazakh species of onions-Allium galanthum and Allium turkestanicum against the reference strains.
Microbial StrainsExtracts
AGbAGcATb
Gram-positive bacteriaMICMBC MIC MBC MIC MBC
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923120.510.51
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213281212
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC BAA1707221111
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228140.510.51
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 66330.2510.1250.50.1250.5
Bacillus cereus ATCC 108760.2520.2520.252
Micrococcus luteus ATCC 10240140.510.51
Gram-negative bacteriaMIC MBCMIC MBCMICMBC
Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028481818
Bordetella bronchiseptica ATCC 4617181818
Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 138834161818
Proteus mirabilis ATCC 124534161818
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922281414
YeastsMIC MFCMICMFCMICMFC
Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019120.50.50.50.5
Candida albicans ATCC 2091110.250.250.250.25
Candida albicans ATCC 102310.1250.50.1250.50.1250.5
Candida glabrata ATCC 900300.250.250.250.250.250.25
Candida krusei ATCC 142430.2510.1250.250.1250.25
Table 4. MIC (mg/mL) and MBC (mg/mL) and MFC (mg/mL) values of different dried extracts obtained from Allium galanthum against the reference strains.
Table 4. MIC (mg/mL) and MBC (mg/mL) and MFC (mg/mL) values of different dried extracts obtained from Allium galanthum against the reference strains.
Microbial StrainsExtracts
AGb_H2OAGb_Et50%AGb_Et70%AGb_Et96%
Gram-positive bacteriaMIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923163216 3216321632
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 292133232323216 321632
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC AA17073232323216 321632
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 122283232323216 321632
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 66331616161616161616
Bacillus cereus ATCC 10876163216 3216321632
Micrococcus luteus ATCC 102403232323216321632
Gram-negative bacteriaMIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC
Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 140281632163216321632
Bordetella bronchiseptica ATCC 461716 16161616161616
Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 138831632163216321632
Proteus mirabilis ATCC 1245316 16161616161616
Escherichia coli ATCC 2592216 32163216321632
YeastsMICMFCMICMFCMICMFCMICMFC
Candida parapsilosis ATCC 2201988888888
Candida albicans ATCC 209188888888
Candida albicans ATCC 102318 8888 888
Candida glabrata ATCC 900308168168 168 16
Candida krusei ATCC 142438168168 168 16
Legend: AGb_H2O, AGb_Et50%, AGb_Et70%, and AGb_Et96% are the water, 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol and 96% ethanol extracts, respectively.
Table 5. MIC (mg/mL) and MBC (mg/mL) and MFC (mg/mL) values of different dried extracts obtained from Allium turkestanicum against reference strains.
Table 5. MIC (mg/mL) and MBC (mg/mL) and MFC (mg/mL) values of different dried extracts obtained from Allium turkestanicum against reference strains.
Microbial StrainsExtracts
ATb_H2OATb_Et50%ATb_Et70%ATb_Et96%
Gram-positive bacteriaMIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 259234162 162 162 16
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 2921316168164848
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC AA1707884 164824
Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 1222888484824
Bacillus subtilis ATCC 66338 16484844
Bacillus cereus ATCC 108768 16416416416
Micrococcus luteus ATCC 1024088484824
Gram-negative bacteriaMIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC MIC MBC
Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 140288 8884844
Bordetella bronchiseptica ATCC 46178 8444424
Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 138838 8444444
Proteus mirabilis ATCC 124538 8444444
Escherichia coli ATCC 259228 844444 4
YeastsMICMFCMICMFCMICMFCMICMFC
Candida parapsilosis ATCC 2201912110.510.51
Candida albicans ATCC 2091120.510.510.5 1
Candida albicans ATCC 10231120.510.510.51
Candida glabrata ATCC 900302412121 2
Candida krusei ATCC 1424322121212
Legend: ATb_H2O, ATb_Et50%, ATb_Et70%, and ATb_Et96% are the water, 50% ethanol, 70% ethanol and 96% ethanol extracts, respectively.
Table 6. The antioxidant activity of extracts from of Kazakhstani bulbs—Allium galanthum bulbs and chives (AGb and AGc, respectively) and Allium turkestanicum bulbs (ATb).
Table 6. The antioxidant activity of extracts from of Kazakhstani bulbs—Allium galanthum bulbs and chives (AGb and AGc, respectively) and Allium turkestanicum bulbs (ATb).
Sample DPPH AssayABTS AssaySample DPPH AssayABTS Assay
AGc_H2O1256.72 ± 19.285.08 ± 0.07AGb_H2O1132.60 ± 23.012.23 ± 0.03
AGc_Et96%1172.78 ± 10.153.70 ± 0.07AGb_Et96%1208.48 ± 21.394.76 ± 0.06
AGc_Et50%1243.51 ± 24.494.87 ± 0.16AGb_Et50%1130.14 ± 17.272.54 ± 0.03
AGc_Et70%1280.78 ± 14.724.53 ± 0.23AGb_Et70%1081.01 ± 46.662.16 ± 0.03
Sample DPPH AssayABTS AssaySample DPPH AssayABTS Assay
ATb_H2O1020.35 ± 40.300.61 ± 0.03ATb_Eth1501.14 ± 10.9550.85 ± 2.90
AGc_Eth975.92 ± 35.9435.68 ± 0.58
ATb_Et96%1071.04 ± 17.821.81 ± 0.04AGb_Eth19,274.78 ± 92.1137.51 ± 2.31
ATb_Et70%1151.29 ± 12.852.65 ± 0.01Vit C1535.46 ± 8.881252.80 ± 8.02
The results are displayed as mg Trolox equivalents per g of dried extract.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kadyrbayeva, G.; Zagórska, J.; Grzegorczyk, A.; Gaweł-Bęben, K.; Strzępek-Gomółka, M.; Ludwiczuk, A.; Czech, K.; Kumar, M.; Koch, W.; Malm, A.; et al. The Phenolic Compounds Profile and Cosmeceutical Significance of Two Kazakh Species of Onions: Alliumgalanthum and A. turkestanicum. Molecules 2021, 26, 5491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185491

AMA Style

Kadyrbayeva G, Zagórska J, Grzegorczyk A, Gaweł-Bęben K, Strzępek-Gomółka M, Ludwiczuk A, Czech K, Kumar M, Koch W, Malm A, et al. The Phenolic Compounds Profile and Cosmeceutical Significance of Two Kazakh Species of Onions: Alliumgalanthum and A. turkestanicum. Molecules. 2021; 26(18):5491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kadyrbayeva, Gulnara, Justyna Zagórska, Agnieszka Grzegorczyk, Katarzyna Gaweł-Bęben, Marcelina Strzępek-Gomółka, Agnieszka Ludwiczuk, Karolina Czech, Manoj Kumar, Wojciech Koch, Anna Malm, and et al. 2021. "The Phenolic Compounds Profile and Cosmeceutical Significance of Two Kazakh Species of Onions: Alliumgalanthum and A. turkestanicum" Molecules 26, no. 18: 5491. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185491

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop