Next Article in Journal
Mechano-Enzymatic Degradation of the Chitin from Crustacea Shells for Efficient Production of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc)
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Rotation—A Reliable Parameter for Authentication of Honey?
Previous Article in Journal
Harnessing Protein-Ligand Interaction Fingerprints to Predict New Scaffolds of RIPK1 Inhibitors
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Use of HPTLC and SDS-PAGE Methods for Coniferous Honeydew Honey Fingerprinting Compiled with Mineral Content and Antioxidant Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 15
10.3390/molecules27154719
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biochemical Reactions and Their Biological Contributions in Honey

by
Wed Mohammed Ali Alaerjani
1,*,
Sraa Abu-Melha
2,
Rahaf Mohammed Hussein Alshareef
1,
Badriah Saad Al-Farhan
2,
Hamed A. Ghramh
3,4,5,
Badria Mohammed Abdallah Al-Shehri
2,3,4,
Majed A. Bajaber
1,
Khalid Ali Khan
3,4,5,
Munira M. Alrooqi
6,
Gad Allah Modawe
7 and
Mohammed Elimam Ahamed Mohammed
1,3,4,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Girls for Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
3
Unit of Honeybee Research and Honey Production, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
4
Research Center for Material Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia
7
Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Omdurman Islamic University, Omdurman 14415, Sudan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(15), 4719; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154719
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 18 July 2022 / Published: 23 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Chemistry of Honey and Other Bee Products: Novel Applications and Quality)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Honey is known for its content of biomolecules, such as enzymes. The enzymes of honey originate from bees, plant nectars, secretions or excretions of plant-sucking insects, or from microorganisms such as yeasts. Honey can be characterized by enzyme-catalyzed and non-enzymatic reactions. Notable examples of enzyme-catalyzed reactions are the production of hydrogen peroxide through glucose oxidase activity and the conversion of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen by catalase enzymes. Production of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) from glucose or fructose is an example of non-enzymatic reactions in honey.

1. Introduction

Honey is a sweet honeybee product which is mainly composed of sugars and water. Biomedical activities of honey are mostly due to its minor components, which include proteins, amino acids, organic acids, dicarbonyl molecules, hydrogen peroxide, phenolic acids, flavonoids, and enzymes [1,2,3]. Honey enzymes originate from three major sources: plant nectars and secretions, honeybees, and excretions of plant-sucking insects. Biochemical reactions can be divided to two types: enzyme-catalyzed and non-enzymatic reactions [4]. Enzyme-catalyzed reactions in honey are known to affect its quality and biological activities [5,6,7]. Enzymes present in honey include the diastase, invertase, glucose oxidase, catalase, glucosylceramidase, α-amylase, α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, and proteases [6,8].
Enzymatic reactions in honey include the conversion of oligosaccharides and disaccharides (sucrose and maltose) to glucose and fructose by diastase and invertase enzyme activity. Glucose is converted to gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide by glucose oxidase. Moreover, hydrogen peroxide is degraded to water and oxygen by catalase enzymes. Honey samples which exhibit high catalase activity are low in hydrogen peroxide [9]. Honey samples with high hydrogen peroxide concentrations are known to be useful for the treatment of wounds, and are characterized by a high activity of glucose oxidase and low activity of catalase [10]. Furthermore, honey and other honeybee products are characterized by enzyme-catalyzed reactions such as the proteases, glucosylceramidase and acid phosphatase [6,11].
Classic non-enzymatic reactions in honey are the production of HMF from glucose or fructose, the formation of diacarbonyl molecules such as methylglyoxal from the dihydroxyacetone of nectar, transglycosylation, and the formation of amino sugars (Maillard reaction) [12,13,14,15].
In this review, we tried to confine the enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions or pathways that occur in honey. The biochemical reactions or pathways in honey play a key role in determining the quality and biological activity of honey samples.
This review article illustrates the biochemical reactions and their substrates, intermediates and products that occur in honey. The intermediates and products of the biochemical reactions are responsible for the biological activities of honey, such as the hydrogen peroxide, methylglyoxal, organic acids, HMF and melanoidins. Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this article is the first review concerning the enzymatic and non-enzymatic biochemical reactions in honey.

2. Enzymatic Reactions in Honey

2.1. Production and Degradation of Hydrogen Peroxide

Hydrogen peroxide is produced as a product of glucose oxidation by glucose oxidase and by the non-enzymatic autoxidation of polyphenols [16,17]. Glucose oxidase is secreted by honeybees; some studies have reported its production by plants, honey fungi, yeast, and bacteria [18,19,20,21]. Glucose oxidase catalyzes the conversion of glucose to gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide, using molecular oxygen and vitamin B2 as cofactors (FAD) (Figure 1).
Honey hydrogen peroxide is degraded by enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions. The major catabolic enzyme of hydrogen peroxide is Fe+3-dependent catalase, which catalyzes the conversion of two H2O2 molecules to two water molecules and one oxygen molecule. Plant nectar and the microorganisms in honey are the major sources of catalase in honey [16,22,23]. Other metal-containing enzymes (metalloenzymes) are capable of converting hydrogen peroxide to water following a different mechanism of action. Metalloenzymes include peroxidases and superoxide dismutase (Figure 1) [24].
Non-enzymatic reactions responsible for the degradation of hydrogen peroxide are the vitamin C and Fenton reactions. Vitamin C (hydro ascorbic acid) donates two protons and two electrons to hydrogen peroxide, reducing it to water and oxygen. It is reported that the addition of vitamin C to honey samples leads to decreased hydrogen peroxide levels, which reinforces the suggestion that vitamin C degrades hydrogen peroxide [16,25]. The second non-enzymatic reaction that depletes hydrogen peroxide from honey is the Fenton reaction. Fenton reactions involve the reaction of hydrogen peroxide with Fe+2 and/or polyphenols to produce hydroxide ions, oxygen, and hydroxyl and superoxide radicals. The hydroxyl and superoxide free radicals contribute to the antibacterial activity of honey because of their powerful damaging effect on the bacterial cells and DNA (Figure 1) [26,27].
Hydrogen peroxide generation in honey is influenced by its colloidal structure, which is due to the interactions between its macromolecules. Macromolecules in honey involved in the formation of the colloidal structure include oligo-sugars, proteins, and polyphenols. Colloidal particles of honey are composed of complexes of proteins, polyphenols, and melanoidins. The colloids of honey are compact and stable, with multiple layers. Colloidal honey samples are characterized by the generation of hydrogen peroxide, and antibiotic and antioxidant activities. Moreover, the colloidal structure of honey increases in dark and medium-color honeys, whereas it is not a character of the light color honeys [16,28].
Most of the antibacterial activity of honeys is due to the hydrogen peroxide concentration, high sugar concentration, and the low pH, due to the content of organic acids in honey, such as gluconic acid. Hydrogen-peroxide-producing honeys are used in wound and burn dressings, either alone or in combination with other medicines such as calcium alginate [16,28,29] (Table 1).

2.2. Proteases

Proteases are responsible for the degradation of proteins to produce amino acids and short peptides according to the type of protease. According to their substrate preference, proteases are classified as endopeptidases and exopeptidases [69,70]. Unifloral honey samples are reported to contain serine protease enzymes, which contribute to their quality and biological activities [6]. A Croatian study reported the presence of three serine proteases in honey: trypsin, chymotrypsin, and elastase [37]. Trypsin cleaves the peptide bonds formed by the carboxyl groups of arginine and lysine [71]. The sites of chymotrypsin cleavage are peptide bonds formed by the carboxyl groups of aromatic amino acids (tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan) and leucine [72]. Elastase is associated with breakdown of the peptide bonds formed by the short aliphatic amino acids such as glycine, alanine, and valine [73]. The major products of honey proteases are short peptides that function as antioxidants, antitumor, and antimicrobials, and are used as weight loss inducers (Figure 2). Alaerjani et al. (2021) published an article which proved the presence of short peptides in honey samples from Saudi Arabia. They analyzed five honey samples using LC–MS and concluded that short peptides in honey samples are of floral origin and storage-dependent [30] (Table 1).
Amino acids and their sequences in short peptides are responsible for their activity. Short peptides that contain cysteine, methionine, tyrosine, lysine, histidine, and tryptophan are known to act as antioxidants [31,32,33]. Short peptides rich in hydrophobic amino acids, such as glysine, alanine, valine, leucine, and isoleucine, are active antimicrobial peptides because of their ability to disrupt the plasma membrane of the microbes [30,34]. Short and cyclic peptides are active as antitumor, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and weight loss inducers, according to their amino acid contents and sequences [35]. Assessments of the amino acid contents, sequences, and concentrations of short peptides in food are carried out using LC–MS techniques [30,74] (Table 1).

3. Enzymes in Honey as Quality Parameters and Indicators for Floral Origin, Honeybee Disease and the Presence of Yeast

3.1. Diastase and Invertase

Diastase (α- and β-amylases) and invertase (α-glucosidase) are hydrolytic enzymes secreted by honeybees to help ripen nectar to produce the mature honey. Diastase is responsible for the conversion of nectar polysaccharides (amylose) to glucose, whereas invertase converts the sucrose of the nectar into fructose and glucose. Diastase enzymes are included as honey quality parameters and indicators for assessing honey storage conditions in all honey standards [1]. Invertase is not adopted as a honey quality parameter; however, it is suggested to be a useful quality parameter in the European standards for honey [36]. Although diastase and invertase originate from honeybees, they can be used as indicators for honey floral origins because the concentration of the substrates affects the enzyme activity [75]. Some studies used the activities of diastase and invertase as quality parameters to predict the floral origin of honey samples through adopting chemometric analysis (principal component analysis (PCA) and clustering analysis) [76,77,78] (Table 1).

3.2. β-Glucosidase

β-glucosidase is an enzyme responsible for the breakdown of β-glucosidic bonds, such as those of cellulose and cellobiose. The β-glucosidase enzyme can be isolated from the ventriculus, honey sac, and hypopharyngeal glands of the Apis malifera [79]. Honey samples have been reported to exert β-glucosidase activity [77].

3.3. Glucosylceramidase (Glucocerebrosidase or Ceramide Glucosidase)

Glucosylceramidase catalyzes the hydrolysis of glucosylceramide (glycolipid) to glucose and ceramide [80]. Glucosylceramidase is reported to be present in buckwheat honey. Deficiencies of glucosylceramidase in insects lead to the accumulation of glucosylceramide, which is associated with abnormalities in memory and movement. Moreover, deficiencies of glucosylceramide in insects and honeybees lead to neurodegeneration and a shorter lifespan (Figure 3) [8].

3.4. Acid Phosphatase

Acid phosphatase is a hydrolytic enzyme which catalyzes the production of inorganic phosphate from organic phosphate. Organic phosphates which act as substrates for acid phosphatase include ATP, phosphatidic acid, and phosphate monoester [81,82,83].
The sources of acid phosphatase in honey are pollens, nectar, and yeast. The enzyme could be used as a marker for the botanical origin of honey and as an indicator of honey fermentation [37,38,39] (Table 1). The activity of acid phosphatase in honey is affected by the pH and climate conditions [39].

4. Non-Enzymatic Reactions in Honey

4.1. Non-Enzymatic Trans-Glycosylation

The formation of di- and oligosaccharides in honey is proved to be through non-enzymatic trans-glycosylation. Trans-glycosylation reactions in honey are promoted by the high concentration of sugars, low moisture percentage, and acidic environment. The disaccharides which are formed through trans-glycosylation are maltose, isomaltose, inulobiose, sophorose, and gentiobiose, whereas the oligosaccharides include 1-kestose, melezitose, and panose [13,84]. Oligosaccharides are classified to four classes according to their structural units. The four oligosaccharides are maltoligosaccharides, fructooligosaccharides, chitanooligosaccharides, and galactooligosaccharides. Fructooligosacchrides constitute 0.75% of honey [85]. Fructooligosaccharides are used as artificial sweeteners, and are characterized by their low caloric values [40]. Fructooligosaccharides with calcium supplements are useful in increasing the bone mineral density in postmenopausal women [41] (Table 1).
The oligosaccharides of honey are active as prebiotic molecules. Prebiotics are non-digestible foods which have functional effects on the gastrointestinal tracts of animals through stimulating the growth of intestinal flora (bifidobacteria and lactobacilli). The intestinal flora is capable of fermenting the oligosaccharides, leading to a decrease in pH, the production of short-chain fatty acids, and reductions in fat absorption and ammonia production [42,43] (Table 1).

4.2. Production and Degradation of Dicarbonyl Compounds

Dicarbonyl compounds are formed in thermally processed foods from the oxidation and degradation of sugars, the Maillard reaction, degradation of lipids, and degradation of vitamin C [86]. Dicarbonyl compounds found in honey samples of different floral origins include glyoxal, methylglyoxal, glucosone, 3-deoxyglucosone, 2,3-butanedione, 3-deoxypentulose, 1,4-dideoxyhexulose, and 3,4-dideoxyglucoson-3-ene (3,4-DGE) [87,88]. Adams et al. (2009) proved that the methylglyoxal of Manuka honey originated from dihydroxyacetone from the flowers of the Manuka tree (Leptospermum scoparium). Dihydroxacetone is non-enzymatically converted to methylglyoxal at a temperature of 37 °C [89]. Dihydroxyacetone of the Manuka tree nectar is mostly obtained from dihydroxyacetone phosphate (the glycolysis intermediate) through hydrolysis reactions. The conversion of dihydroxyactone phosphate to dihydroxyacetone may occur enzymatically through dihydroxyacetone phosphatase, such as reactions in the Corynebacterium glutamicum [90], or through non-enzymatic hydrolysis (Figure 4).
Dicarbonyl molecules are catabolized through variable non-enzymatic reactions to volatile aroma compounds and food-browning molecules [44]. Small dicarbonyl molecules (glyoxal and methylglyoxal) can react with amino groups of free amino acids such as methionine and leucine to form methional and methylbutanal, respectively. Methional and methylbutanal contribute to food flavors and odorants [45]. Moreover, the dicarbonyl molecules can bind the amino and guanido groups of lysine, nucleosides, and arginine residue on protein or nucleosides to form complexes such as advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and nucleoside AGEs [46,47]. The presence of sodium chloride in foods leads to the conversion of dicarbonyl molecules to furfurals, whereas reactions of the dicarbonyl compounds with phenolic molecules form complexes responsible for food browning, such as melanoidins [48,49].
Dicarbonyl molecules are major contributors to the antibacterial activity of honey, such as methylglyoxal of Manuka honey [50,51]. High blood levels of dicarbonyl compounds are reported to be associated with diabetes, uremia, and negative effects on the blood vessels, whereas glyoxal exhibits tumorigenic activity [44,52]. Some studies have reported that methylglyoxal exhibits tumorigenic and antitumor activities. Antitumor activities of methylglyoxal include the induction of cancer cell apoptosis and inhibition of the proliferation and invasion of colon cancer, leukemia, and breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [44]. The tumorigenic activity of methylglyoxal is possibly through different modes of actions, such as the depletion of ATP through activating glycation reactions on specific arginine residues on ATP-producing enzymes, the glycation of nucleosides on DNA, and the glycation of histones [44]. The presence of methylglyoxal in foods with creatine or ascorbic acid supports its anticancer activity [44] (Table 1).

4.3. Production and Degradation of HMF

HMF is a six-carbon cyclic compound with two functional groups: aldehyde and hydroxymethyl. HMF is produced from the non-enzymatic degradation of glucose or fructose. HMF is considered to be an intermediate product of the Maillard reaction (browning of food). Glucose is converted to fructofuranose through isomerization reactions, and fructofuranose undergoes three dehydration reactions and enolization to produce HMF (Figure 5) [14,91,92].
The formation of HMF in honey is induced by the pH, acidity, minerals, and hexose sugars. Storage and processing conditions are known to increase the production rate of HMF, i.e., a high temperature and long storage duration (even at room temperature) [93,94,95,96]. The storage of honey at low temperatures (below 25 °C) does not facilitate the excessive production of HMF, which exceeds the range of international honey standards [97,98].
HMF is degraded non-enzymatically to produce formic and levulinic acids, in addition to soluble polymers and insoluble humins [92,99] (Figure 5).
Two studies have suggested that high HMF concentrations are not an indication for honey storage at a temperature range of 21–50 °C [100,101]. Fallico et al. (2008) proved that the degradation rate of HMF in citrus and chestnut honey is greater than its production rate at temperatures between 25 °C and 50 °C [100]. Moreover, Khan et al. (2021) reported that freshly harvested honey samples are characterized by high HMF concentrations compared with honey stored at room temperature (21–36 °C) for one year [53]. The findings of Fallico et al. (2008) and Khan et al. (2021) illustrated that stored honey, or honey samples treated at temperatures between 21 °C and 50 °C, are characterized by low HMF concentrations [100,101]. Consequently, Fallico et al. (2008) suggested the removal of HMF from the honey standards because it is not an indicator for honey storage or treatment [100]. The findings of Fallico et al. (2008) and Khan et al. (2021) contradict the well-established fact that HMF production in honey increases during storage and heat processing. The major scientific fact behind their findings is the production and degradation rates of HMF in a temperature range of 21–50 °C.
HMF in honey threatens the life of honeybees [53,54]; moreover, it has negative and positive effects on human health. Negative effects of HMF on human health include hepato-renal toxicity, decreased glutathione levels in the cells, inductions of neoplastic changes, and irritation of the mucous membranes of the upper respiratory tract, eyes, and skin [55,56,57]. Positive effects of HMF on human health include antioxidant, anti-carcinogenic, anti-allergenic, and anti-hyperuricemic activities [58,59,60] (Table 1).
The toxic level of HMF for humans is not yet clarified, because the metabolism of HMF is health-condition-dependent. However, humans can ingest from 30 to 150 mg of HMF daily from different food sources, and it is reported that HMF is completely cleared from human bodies within 24–48 h, even if taken at a level of 240 mg/day [91]. From the researched literature, it is obvious that honey is very safe for human consumption.

4.4. Maillard Reaction in Honey

The Maillard reaction is associated with reactions of sugars and amino acids in water. It is responsible for food browning during heating processes. The Maillard reaction is defined as an interaction between the carbonyl groups of sugars and groups of amino acids, proteins, or other nitrogenous compounds, leading to the production of brown compounds known as melanoidins [102]. The Maillard reaction has three stages: early, advanced, and final stage. The early stage of the Millard reaction involves a combination of sugars and amino groups, which leads to the formation of Amadori products (complexes of sugars and amino acids) such as N-(1-Deoxy-1-fructosyl) phenylalanine, which has recently been found in heated acacia honey samples [103]. In the advanced or intermediate stage, the Amadori products are broken down to different compounds including the amino aldoses and ketoses. The amino aldoses are further degraded to form deoxy dicarbonyls and enediols, while amino ketoses are converted to 2-amino-2-deoxy-aldoses through Heyns rearrangement. The intermediate-stage reactions are acid-catalyzed [104]. The final stage of the Millard reaction is associated with the formation of melanoidin polymers, which are formed from sugar fragments, amino products, polyphenols, quinones, and proteins. Generally, melanoidins are associated with food browning [14,105,106] (Figure 6).
Brudzynski et al. (2013) stated that the storage of honey at different temperatures decreased the concentration of honey proteins and led to the formation of complexes of proteins–polyphenols and proteins–quniones [106].
Hellwig et al. (2017) found that samples of Manuka honey were characterized by high concentrations of Maillard reaction products, such as methylglyoxal-derived hydroimidazolone 1 (MG-H1) and carboxyethyllysine (CEL) [15].
The Maillard reaction is induced by different factors such as the water activity, initial pH, amino group, oxygen, sugar temperature, and heating time [61]. Many studies have reported that Maillard reaction products act as antioxidant and antibacterial agents [14,62,63,64] (Table 1).

4.5. Caramelization in Honey

Caramelization is the heating of any sugar using high temperatures (≥180 °C) until its color is changed to brown–black. It is a non-enzymatic process involving the dehydration of sugars under dry or concentrated solutions. Caramelization produces solid, semi-solid, and liquid products, with colors ranging from light brown to medium and dark. The products of caramelization depend on the temperature used. To obtain a light brown color, the sugar or food is heated to 180 °C; a medium color can be achieved by heating at 181–187 °C; and a dark color is obtained through heating at 188–204 °C [107,108,109].
Rahardjo et al. (2020) obtained light, medium, and dark caramel colors of honey by heating at 107 °C, 180–182 °C, and 188–190 °C, respectively [107]. The products of the caramelization reaction included deoxyosones, furan and pyran derivatives, HMF, hydroxydimethylfuranone (HDF), and hydroxyacetilfuran (HAF). The products of caramelization reactions contribute to the color, aroma, and flavor of honey, in addition to exerting antioxidant activity [65,66,67,68] (Table 1).

5. Conclusions

This review summarized, for the first time, the biochemical reactions in honey, including enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions. The substrates, intermediates, and products of the biochemical reactions in honey are major contributors to the biological activities of honey.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.M.A.A., S.A.-M., B.S.A.-F., R.M.H.A. and M.E.A.M.; methodology, R.M.H.A., B.S.A.-F., M.M.A., M.A.B. and G.A.M.; software, M.E.A.M., M.M.A. and B.M.A.A.-S.; investigation, W.M.A.A. and M.E.A.M.; resources, H.A.G.; data curation, M.E.A.M. and B.M.A.A.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.M.A.A. and R.M.H.A.; writing—review and editing, M.E.A.M., S.A.-M. and K.A.K.; supervision, M.E.A.M., S.A.-M. and B.S.A.-F.; project administration, M.E.A.M.; funding acquisition, H.A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review is funded by the Research Center for Material Science at King Khalid University under grant number KKU/RCAMS/22.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are presented in review article.

Acknowledgments

Thanks and appreciations are due to the Saudi Arabian petroleum and natural gas company (Saudi Aramco) and the Poison Control and Medical Forensic Chemistry Centre, Ministry of Health, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia for their encouragement and logistic assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors certify that there are no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

References

  1. Codex Alimentarius. International Food Standards. CXS 12-1981. Standard for Honey 1981. Revised 2019. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B12-1981%252Fcxs_012e.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2022).
  2. Viuda-Martos, M.; Ruiz-Navajas, Y.; Fernández-López, J.; Pérez-Álvarez, J.A. Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, R117–R124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. da Silva, P.M.; Gauche, C.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Costa, A.C.O.; Fett, R. Honey: Chemical composition, stability and authenticity. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Erkmen, O.; Bozoglu, T.F. Enzymatic and Nonenzymatic Food Spoilage. In Food Microbiology: Principles into Practice; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, J.; Li, Q.X. Chemical Composition, Characterization, and Differentiation of Honey Botanical and Geographical Origins. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2011, 62, 89–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rossano, R.; LaRocca, M.; Polito, T.; Perna, A.M.; Padula, M.C.; Martelli, G.; Riccio, P. What Are the Proteolytic Enzymes of Honey and What They Do Tell Us? A Fingerprint Analysis by 2-D Zymography of Unifloral Honeys. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Utzeri, V.J.; Schiavo, G.; Ribani, A.; Tinarelli, S.; Bertolini, F.; Bovo, S.; Fontanesi, L. Entomological signatures in honey: An environmental DNA metabarcoding approach can disclose information on plant-sucking insects in agricultural and forest landscapes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Borutinskaite, V.; Treigyte, G.; Čeksteryte, V.; Kurtinaitiene, B.; Navakauskiene, R. Proteomic identification and enzymatic activity of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) honey based on different assays. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2018, 57, 57–69. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nolan, V.C.; Harrison, J.; Cox, J.A. Dissecting the antimicrobial composition of honey. Antibiotics 2019, 8, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bizerra, F.C.; Da Silva, P.I.; Hayashi, M.A.F. Exploring the antibacterial properties of honey and its potential. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Barboni, E.; Kemeny, D.; Campos, S.; Vernon, C. The purification of acid phosphatase from honey bee venom (Apis mellifica). Toxicon 1987, 25, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boonchiangma, S.; Chanthai, S.; Srijaranai, S.; Srijaranai, S. Chemical Compositions and Non-Enzymatic Browning Compounds of Thai Honey: A Kinetic Study. J. Food Process Eng. 2009, 34, 1584–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Silva, S.P.; Moreira, A.S.P.; Domingues, M.D.R.M.; Evtuguin, D.V.; Coelho, E.; Coimbra, M.A. Contribution of non-enzymatic transglycosylation reactions to the honey oligosaccharides origin and diversity. Pure Appl. Chem. 2019, 91, 1231–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nagai, T.; Kai, N.; Tanoue, Y.; Suzuki, N. Chemical properties of commercially available honey species and the functional properties of caramelization and Maillard reaction products derived from these honey species. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 55, 586–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hellwig, M.; Rückriemen, J.; Sandner, D.; Henle, T. Unique Pattern of Protein-Bound Maillard Reaction Products in Manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) Honey. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3532–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brudzynski, K. A current perspective on hydrogen peroxide production in honey. A review. Food Chem. 2020, 332, 127229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Grzesik, M.; Bartosz, G.; Stefaniuk, I.; Pichla, M.; Namieśnik, J.; Sadowska-Bartosz, I. Dietary antioxidants as a source of hydrogen peroxide. Food Chem. 2018, 278, 692–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Carter, C.; Thornburg, R.W. Tobacco Nectarin I. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 36726–36733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Carter, C.J.; Thornburg, R.W. Tobacco Nectarin V Is a Flavin-Containing Berberine Bridge Enzyme-Like Protein with Glucose Oxidase Activity. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Silva, M.S.; Rabadzhiev, Y.; Eller, M.R.; Iliev, I.; Ivanova, I.; Santana, W.C. Microorganisms in Honey; Intech Open: Vienna, Austria, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Endo, A.; Salminen, S. Honeybees and beehives are rich sources for fructophilic lactic acid bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 36, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brudzynski, K.; Abubaker, K.; Laurent, M.; Castle, A. Re-Examining the Role of Hydrogen Peroxide in Bacteriostatic and Bactericidal Activities of Honey. Front. Microbiol. 2011, 2, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gillette, C.C. Honey catalase. J. Econ. Entomol. 1931, 24, 605–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zámocký, M.; Gasselhuber, B.; Furtmüller, P.G.; Obinger, C. Molecular evolution of hydrogen peroxide degrading enzymes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2012, 525, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Majtan, J.; Sojka, M.; Palenikova, H.; Bucekova, M.; Majtan, V. Vitamin C Enhances the Antibacterial Activity of Honey against Planktonic and Biofilm-Embedded Bacteria. Molecules 2020, 25, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Brudzynski, K.; Lannigan, R. Mechanism of Honey Bacteriostatic Action against MRSA and VRE Involves Hydroxyl Radicals Generated from Honey’s Hydrogen Peroxide. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Cos, P.; Calomme, M.; Pieters, L.; Vlietinck, A.; Berghe, D.V. Structure-Activity Relationship of Flavonoids as Antioxidant and Pro-Oxidant Compounds. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2000, 22, 307–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brudzynski, K.; Miotto, D.; Kim, L.; Sjaarda, C.; Maldonado-Alvarez, L.; Fukś, H. Active macromolecules of honey form colloidal particles essential for honey antibacterial activity and hydrogen peroxide production. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 7637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hossain, L.; Lim, L.; Hammer, K.; Hettiarachchi, D.; Locher, C. Honey-Based Medicinal Formulations: A Critical Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alaerjani, W.M.A.; Abu-Melha, S.A.; Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Alalmie, A.Y.A.; Alshareef, R.M.H.; Al-Shehri, B.M.; Mohammed, M.E.A. Presence of short and cyclic peptides in Acacia and Ziziphus honeys may potentiate their medicinal values. Open Chem. 2021, 19, 1162–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zheng, L.; Zhao, Y.; Dong, H.; Su, G.; Zhao, M. Structure–activity relationship of antioxidant dipeptides: Dominant role of Tyr, Trp, Cys and Met residues. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 21, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, H.; Kouzuma, Y.; Yonekura, M. Structures and properties of antioxidative peptides derived from royal jelly protein. Food Chem. 2009, 113, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Karami, Z.; Akbari-Adergani, B. Bioactive food derived peptides: A review on correlation between structure of bioactive peptides and their functional properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kuroda, K.; Caputo, G.A. Antimicrobial polymers as synthetic mimics of host-defense peptides. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2012, 5, 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Joo, S.-H. Cyclic Peptides as Therapeutic Agents and Biochemical Tools. Biomol. Ther. 2012, 20, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Bogdanov, S.; Lüllmann, C.; Martin, P.; von der Ohe, W.; Russmann, H.; Vorwohl, G.; Oddo, L.P.; Sabatini, A.G.; Marcazzan, G.L.; Piro, R.; et al. Honey Quality and International Regulatory Standards. European Honey Standards 1999. Available online: https://www.apiservices.biz/en/articles/sort-by-date-up-online/768-honey-quality-and-international-regulatory-standards-1999 (accessed on 17 July 2022).
  37. Aušević, B.; Haurdic, B.; Jašić, M.; Bašić, M. Enzymatic activities in honey. In Proceedings of the Second Conference of Bee Keeping and Bee Products- with International Participation- Bee Keeping and Bee Products, Gradačac, Bosnia and Herzegovina, 20 August 2017; pp. 90–97. [Google Scholar]
  38. Alonso-Torre, S.; Cavia, M.M.; Fernández-Muiño, M.; Moreno, G.; Huidobro, J.; Sancho, M. Evolution of acid phosphatase activity of honeys from different climates. Food Chem. 2006, 97, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Miłek, M.; Bocian, A.; Kleczyńska, E.; Sowa, P.; Dżugan, M. The Comparison of Physicochemical Parameters, Antioxidant Activity and Proteins for the Raw Local Polish Honeys and Imported Honey Blends. Molecules 2021, 26, 2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mussatto, S.I.; Aguilar, C.N.; Rodrigues, L.R.; Teixeira, J. Fructooligosaccharides and β-fructofuranosidase production by Aspergillus japonicus immobilized on lignocellulosic materials. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2009, 59, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Slevin, M.M.; Allsopp, P.J.; Magee, P.J.; Bonham, M.P.; Naughton, V.R.; Strain, J.J.; Duffy, M.E.; Wallace, J.M.; Mc Sorley, E.M. Supplementation with Calcium and Short-Chain Fructo-Oligosaccharides Affects Markers of Bone Turnover but Not Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women. J. Nutr. 2013, 144, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Flamm, G.; Glinsmann, W.; Kritchevsky, D.; Prosky, L.; Roberfroid, M. Inulin and Oligofructose as Dietary Fiber: A Review of the Evidence. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2001, 41, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miguel, M.G.; Antunes, M.D.; Faleiro, M.L. Honey as a Complementary Medicine. Integr. Med. Insights 2017, 12, 1178633717702869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hellwig, M.; Gensberger-Reigl, S.; Henle, T.; Pischetsrieder, M. Food-derived 1,2-dicarbonyl compounds and their role in diseases. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 49, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rizzi, G.P. The Strecker Degradation of Amino Acids: Newer Avenues for Flavor Formation. Food Rev. Int. 2008, 24, 416–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s Chemical Signatures in Human Olfaction: A Foodborne Perspective for Future Biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7124–7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Frischmann, M.; Bidmon, C.; Angerer, A.J.; Pischetsrieder, M. Identification of DNA Adducts of Methylglyoxal. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, 1586–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kocadağlı, T.; Gökmen, V. Effects of Sodium Chloride, Potassium Chloride, and Calcium Chloride on the Formation of α-Dicarbonyl Compounds and Furfurals and the Development of Browning in Cookies during Baking. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 7838–7848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cämmerer, B.; Jalyschko, W.; Kroh, L.W. Intact Carbohydrate Structures as Part of the Melanoidin Skeleton. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2083–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Almasaudi, S. The antibacterial activities of honey. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 28, 2188–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Johnston, M.; McBride, M.; Dahiya, D.; Owusu-Apenten, R.; Nigam, P.S. Antibacterial activity of Manuka honey and its components: An overview. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Svendsen, C.; Høie, A.H.; Alexander, J.; Murkovic, M.; Husøy, T. The food processing contaminant glyoxal promotes tumour growth in the multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min) mouse model. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2016, 94, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Krainer, S.; Brodschneider, R.; Vollmann, J.; Crailsheim, K.; Riessberger-Gallé, U. Effect of hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) on mortality of artificially reared honey bee larvae (Apis mellifera carnica). Ecotoxicology 2015, 25, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bailey, L. The Effect of Acid-Hydrolysed Sucrose on Honeybees. J. Apic. Res. 1966, 5, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Surh, Y.-J.; Liem, A.; Miller, J.A.; Tannenbaum, S.R. 5-Sulfooxymethylfurfural as a possible ultimate mutagenic and carcinogenic metabolite of the Maillard reaction product, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Carcinogenesis 1994, 15, 2375–2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bakhiya, N.; Monien, B.; Frank, H.; Seidel, A.; Glatt, H. Renal organic anion transporters OAT1 and OAT3 mediate the cellular accumulation of 5-sulfooxymethylfurfural, a reactive, nephrotoxic metabolite of the Maillard product 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2009, 78, 414–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Morales, F.J. Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and related compounds. In Process-Induced Food Toxicants: Occurrence, Formation, Mitigation, and Health Risks; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; ISBN 978-0-470-07475-6. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhao, L.; Chen, J.; Su, J.; Li, L.; Hu, S.; Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.; Chen, T. In Vitro Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activities of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10604–10611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Alizadeh, M.; Khodaei, H.; Abbasi, M.M.; Saleh-Ghadimi, S. Assessing the effect of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural on selected components of immune responses in mice immunised with ovalbumin. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 3979–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Lin, S.-M.; Wu, J.-Y.; Su, C.; Ferng, S.; Lo, C.-Y.; Chiou, R.Y.-Y. Identification and Mode of Action of 5-Hydroxymethyl-2-furfural (5-HMF) and 1-Methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-β-carboline-3-carboxylic Acid (MTCA) as Potent Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitors in Vinegars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 9856–9862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wu, S.; Hu, J.; Wei, L.; Du, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, L. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Maillard reaction products from xylan with chitosan/chitooligomer/glucosamine hydrochloride/taurine model systems. Food Chem. 2014, 148, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Starowicz, M.; Ostaszyk, A.; Zieliński, H. The Relationship between the Browning Index, Total Phenolics, Color, and Antioxidant Activity of Polish-Originated Honey Samples. Foods 2021, 10, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Brudzynski, K. Honey melanoidins: Emerging novel understanding on the mechanism of antioxidant and antibacterial action of honey. In Honey: Current Research and Clinical Applications; Majtan, J., Ed.; Nova Science Publisher, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  64. Antony, S.M.; Han, I.Y.; Rieck, J.R.; Dawson, P.L. Antioxidative Effect of Maillard Reaction Products Formed from Honey at Different Reaction Times. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3985–3989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sengar, G.; Sharma, H.K. Food caramels: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 51, 1686–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Kroh, L.W. Caramelisation in food and beverages. Food Chem. 1994, 51, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Brenna, O.V.; Ceppi, E.L.; Giovanelli, G. Antioxidant capacity of some caramel-containing soft drinks. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tsai, P.-J.; Yu, T.-Y.; Chen, S.-H.; Liu, C.-C.; Sun, Y.-F. Interactive role of color and antioxidant capacity in caramels. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rawlings, N.; Barrett, A. Evolutionary families of peptidases. Biochem. J. 1993, 290, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Rawlings, N.D. Twenty-five years of nomenclature and classification of proteolytic enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Proteins Proteom. 2019, 1868, 140345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Simpson, R.J. Fragmentation of Protein Using Trypsin. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2006, 2006, prot4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gráf, L.; Szilágyi, L.; Venekei, I. Chymotrypsin. In Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, 3rd ed.; Rawlings, N.D., Salvesen, G., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 2626–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Cotten, S.W. Evaluation of exocrine pancreatic function. In Contemporary Practice in Clinical Chemistry, 4th ed.; Clarke, W., Marzinke, M.A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 573–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gillette, M.A.; Carr, S.A. Quantitative analysis of peptides and proteins in biomedicine by targeted mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lichtenberg-Kraag, B. Evidence for correlation between invertase activity and sucrose content during the ripening process of honey. J. Apic. Res. 2014, 53, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Huang, Z.; Liu, L.; Li, G.; Li, H.; Ye, D.; Li, X. Nondestructive Determination of Diastase Activity of Honey Based on Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Molecules 2019, 24, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Huidobro, J.F.; Santana, F.J.; Sanchez, M.P.; Sancho, M.T.; Muniategui, S.; Simal-Lozano, J. Diastase, invertase and β-glucosidase activities in fresh honey from north-west Spain. J. Apic. Res. 1995, 34, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Serrano, S.; Espejo, R.; Villarejo, M.; Jodral, M.L. Diastase and invertase activities in Andalusian honeys. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pontoh, J.; Low, N. Purification and characterization of β-glucosidase from honey bees (Apis mellifera). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 32, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gloster, T.M.; Madsen, R.; Davies, G.J. Structural basis for cyclophellitol inhibition of a β-glucosidase. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 5, 444–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tagad, C.K.; Sabharwal, S.G. Purification and characterization of acid phosphatase from Macrotyloma uiflorum seeds. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 55, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Carman, G.M.; Han, G.-S. Fat-regulating phosphatidic acid phosphatase: A review of its roles and regulation in lipid homeostasis. J. Lipid Res. 2019, 60, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Widlanski, T.S.; Taylor, W. Chemistry and enzymology of phosphatases. In Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry; Barton, S.D., Nakanishi, K., Meth-Cohn, O., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; pp. 139–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Weston, R.J.; Brocklebank, L.K. The oligosaccharide composition of some New Zealand honeys. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Belorkar, S.A.; Gupta, A.K. Oligosaccharides: A boon from nature’s desk. AMB Express 2016, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Zheng, J.; Ou, J.; Ou, S. Alpha-Dicarbonyl Compounds; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 19–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Arena, E.; Ballistreri, G.; Tomaselli, F.; Fallico, B. Survey of 1,2-Dicarbonyl Compounds in Commercial Honey of Different Floral Origin. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, C1203–C1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Marceau, E.; Yaylayan, V.A. Profiling of α-Dicarbonyl Content of Commercial Honeys from Different Botanical Origins: Identification of 3,4-Dideoxyglucoson-3-ene (3,4-DGE) and Related Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 10837–10844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Adams, C.J.; Manley-Harris, M.; Molan, P.C. The origin of methylglyoxal in New Zealand manuka (Leptospermum scoparium) honey. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1050–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jojima, T.; Igari, T.; Gunji, W.; Suda, M.; Inui, M.; Yukawa, H. Identification of a HAD superfamily phosphatase, HdpA, involved in 1,3-dihydroxyacetone production during sugar catabolism in Corynebacterium glutamicum. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 4228–4232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Shapla, U.M.; Solayman, M.; Alam, N.; Khalil, M.I.; Gan, S.H. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) levels in honey and other food products: Effects on bees and human health. Chem. Cent. J. 2018, 12, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yang, W.; Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Huang, Z.Y.; Miao, X. Pathway of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde formation in honey. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 2417–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Fallico, B.; Zappalà, M.; Arena, E.; Verzera, A. Effects of conditioning on HMF content in unifloral honeys. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Khalil, M.; Sulaiman, S.; Gan, S. High 5-hydroxymethylfurfural concentrations are found in Malaysian honey samples stored for more than one year. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 2388–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Islam, A.; Khalil, I.; Islam, N.; Moniruzzaman, M.; Mottalib, A.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Gan, S.H. Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Bangladeshi honeys stored for more than one year. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Singh, I.; Singh, S. Honey moisture reduction and its quality. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 3861–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Moniruzzaman, M.; Khalil, M.I.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Gan, S.H. Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Malaysian honeys produced by Apis cerana, Apis dorsata and Apis mellifera. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Chou, W.-M.; Liao, H.-C.; Yang, Y.-C.; Peng, C.-C. Evaluation of Honey Quality with Stored Time and Temperatures. J. Food Nutr. Res. 2020, 8, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. ACS Network Chemistry Community Online. Bio-Based Platform Chemicals and Alternative Feedstocks. 2014. Available online: https://communities.acs.org/t5/GCI-Nexus-Blog/Bio-based-Platform-Chemicals-and-Alternative-Feedstocks/ba-p/15814 (accessed on 17 July 2022).
  100. Fallico, B.; Arena, E.; Zappala, M. Degradation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural in Honey. J. Food Sci. 2008, 73, C625–C631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Babiker, M.; Ahmad, Z.; El-Niweiri, M.A.A.; Ibrahim, E.H.; Brima, E.I.; Mohammed, M.E.A. Tolerance of Ziziphus and Acacia honeys to one year storage conditions and altitude. J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2021, 33, 101577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zeng, X.; Bai, W.; Zhu, X.; Dong, H. Browning Intensity and Taste Change Analysis of Chicken Protein-Sugar Maillard Reaction System with Antioxidants and Different Drying Processes. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2016, 41, e13117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yan, S.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, K.; Shan, J.; Xue, X. A metabolomics approach revealed an Amadori compound distinguishes artificially heated and naturally matured acacia honey. Food Chem. 2022, 385, 132631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Amaya-Farfan, J.; Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B. The Maillard reactions. In Chemical Changes during Processing and Storage of Foods; Rodriguez-Amaya, D.B., Amaya-Farfan, J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 215–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kumar, N.; Raghavendra, M.; Tokas, J.; Singal, H.R. Flavor addition in dairy products. In Nutrients in Dairy and their Implications on Health and Disease; Watson, R.R., Collier, R.J., Preedy, V.R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Brudzynski, K.; Sjaarda, C.; Maldonado-Alvarez, L. A New Look on Protein-Polyphenol Complexation during Honey Storage: Is This a Random or Organized Event with the Help of Dirigent-Like Proteins? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Rahardjo, M.; Sihombing, M.; Anggraeni, M.K. Color development and antioxidant activity in honey caramel. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Paravisini, L.; Gourrat-Pernin, K.; Gouttefangeas, C.; Moretton, C.; Nigay, H.; Dacremont, C.; Guichard, E. Identification of compounds responsible for the odorant properties of aromatic caramel. Flavour Fragr. J. 2012, 27, 424–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Chappel, C.; Howell, J. Caramel colours—A historical introduction. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1992, 30, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 04719 g001 550
Figure 1. Production and degradation of hydrogen peroxide in honey. Hydrogen peroxide is produced from glucose by the action of glucose oxidase and non-enzymatically by polyphenols. Hydrogen peroxide is degraded to water and oxygen by enzymes and vitamin C, whereas it is degraded to hydroxyl and superoxide radicals through the Fenton reaction [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
Figure 1. Production and degradation of hydrogen peroxide in honey. Hydrogen peroxide is produced from glucose by the action of glucose oxidase and non-enzymatically by polyphenols. Hydrogen peroxide is degraded to water and oxygen by enzymes and vitamin C, whereas it is degraded to hydroxyl and superoxide radicals through the Fenton reaction [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
Molecules 27 04719 g001
Molecules 27 04719 g002 550
Figure 2. The proteases in honey: their types, origin, substrate, products, and their contribution to the biological activities of honey [6,30,37,69,70,71,72,73].
Figure 2. The proteases in honey: their types, origin, substrate, products, and their contribution to the biological activities of honey [6,30,37,69,70,71,72,73].
Molecules 27 04719 g002
Molecules 27 04719 g003 550
Figure 3. Glucosylceramidase in honey and its effect on the honeybee’s health [8,80].
Figure 3. Glucosylceramidase in honey and its effect on the honeybee’s health [8,80].
Molecules 27 04719 g003
Molecules 27 04719 g004 550
Figure 4. Production of methylglyoxal in Manuka honey [89].
Figure 4. Production of methylglyoxal in Manuka honey [89].
Molecules 27 04719 g004
Molecules 27 04719 g005 550
Figure 5. Production and degradation of HMF in honey [14,91,92].
Figure 5. Production and degradation of HMF in honey [14,91,92].
Molecules 27 04719 g005
Molecules 27 04719 g006 550
Figure 6. Stages of the Maillard reaction in honey [14,103,104,105,106].
Figure 6. Stages of the Maillard reaction in honey [14,103,104,105,106].
Molecules 27 04719 g006
Table
Table 1. Honey reactions and their biological activities.
Table 1. Honey reactions and their biological activities.
Reaction Enzyme Products Biological Activity Ref.
1Production of hydrogen peroxideGlucose oxidaseHydrogen peroxide and gluconic acidAntibacterial and wound and burn dressings[16,28,29]
2Production of short peptidesProteasesShort peptidesAntimicrobial, antioxidant, antitumor and weight loss inducers[30,31,32,33,34,35]
3Degradation of amyloseDiastaseGlucose and maltoseHoney quality parameter that indicates storage conditions[1]
4Degradation of sucroseInvertaseGlucose and fructoseIndicator for honey storage conditions[36]
5Degradation of organic phosphatesAcid phosphataseInorganic phosphateMarker of honey floral origin and indicator of honey fermentation[37,38,39]
6Trans-glycosylationNon-enzymaticDisaccharides
Oligosacharides		Artificial sweeteners,
increase bone mineral density in postmenopausal women (fructooligosaccharides), and classified as prebiotic molecules		[40,41,42,43]
7Production and degradation of dicarbonylsEnzymatic (dihydroxyacetone phosphatase) and non-enzymaticDicarbonyls (glyoxal, methylglyoxal and 3-deoxyglucosone), methional and methylbutanal, AGEs and nucleoside AGEs and melanoidins1-Antibacterial, antitumor, antioxidant and contribution to the honey color, flavor and odorant.
2-High level of dicarbonyl molecules are reported to be with some toxicity to the humans such as tumerigenic, negative impact on blood vessels and induction of diabtes and uremia		[44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]
8Production and degradation of HMFNon-enzymaticHMF, formic and levulinic acids, soluble HMF polymers and insoluble huminsThreatening honeybee life, human hepatorenal toxicity, induction of neoplastic changes, and irritation of mucous membranes
HMF has positive impacts on human health, such as antioxidant, anti-carcinogen, anti-allergenic, and anti-hyperuricemic activities		[53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60]
9Maillard reactionNon-enzymaticComplexes of sugars and amino acids, amino aldoses and ketoses, dicarbonyls, enediols, 2-amino-2-deoxy-ald-oses and melanoidinsAntibacterial and antioxidant[14,61,62,63,64]
10CaramelizationNon-enzymaticDeoxyosones, furan and pyran derivatives, HMF, hydroxydimethylfuranone (HDF) and hydroxyacetilfuran (HAF)Contribution to the color, aroma, and flavor of honey and antioxidants[65,66,67,68]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alaerjani, W.M.A.; Abu-Melha, S.; Alshareef, R.M.H.; Al-Farhan, B.S.; Ghramh, H.A.; Al-Shehri, B.M.A.; Bajaber, M.A.; Khan, K.A.; Alrooqi, M.M.; Modawe, G.A.; et al. Biochemical Reactions and Their Biological Contributions in Honey. Molecules 2022, 27, 4719. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154719

AMA Style

Alaerjani WMA, Abu-Melha S, Alshareef RMH, Al-Farhan BS, Ghramh HA, Al-Shehri BMA, Bajaber MA, Khan KA, Alrooqi MM, Modawe GA, et al. Biochemical Reactions and Their Biological Contributions in Honey. Molecules. 2022; 27(15):4719. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alaerjani, Wed Mohammed Ali, Sraa Abu-Melha, Rahaf Mohammed Hussein Alshareef, Badriah Saad Al-Farhan, Hamed A. Ghramh, Badria Mohammed Abdallah Al-Shehri, Majed A. Bajaber, Khalid Ali Khan, Munira M. Alrooqi, Gad Allah Modawe, and et al. 2022. "Biochemical Reactions and Their Biological Contributions in Honey" Molecules 27, no. 15: 4719. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154719

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop