Next Article in Journal
Lignin from Agro-Industrial Waste to an Efficient Magnetic Adsorbent for Hazardous Crystal Violet Removal
Previous Article in Journal
Polyopes affinis Suppressed IFN-γ- and TNF-α-Induced Inflammation in Human Keratinocytes via Down-Regulation of the NF-κB and STAT1 Pathways
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Molecules in Non-Treated Blood Using Mercury Immobilized Carbon Nanotube Sensor

1
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul 02841, Korea
2
Smith College of Liberal Arts, Sahmyook University, 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01795, Korea
3
College of Nursing, Sahmyook University, 815, Hwarang-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01795, Korea
4
Biosensor Research Institute, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(6), 1837; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061837
Submission received: 28 January 2022 / Revised: 26 February 2022 / Accepted: 8 March 2022 / Published: 11 March 2022

Abstract

:
Staphylococcus aureus bacteria is a ubiquitous Gram-positive microorganism that causes infections related to the sudden infant death syndrome. Recently, basic detection methods depend on complicated PCR amplification, electric separation, spectric adsorption and other detection systems. However, in this study, simplified sensitive voltammetric skills are developed. To identify an effective diagnostic method for Staphylococcus aureus (SA), a voltammetric sensing probe was sought using mercury immobilized on a carbon nanotube sensor (MCN). The voltammetric MCN conditions were optimized through stripping and cyclic voltammetry. Diagnostic electrolyte was used on non-treated blood sera as an electrolyte solution. The optimum cyclic and stripping analytical working range was 0.5–4.0 mL (3 × 102~5 × 102 CFU/0.5 mL) SA. The statistic relative standard deviation of 0.1 mL SA was observed to be 0.0078 (n = 5). Using the optimum parameters, a diagnostic test was performed by the direct assay of SA in non-treated human blood and patient sera. Here, the developed results can be used for the direct assay of non-treated blood sera, organ monitoring, in-vivo diagnosis, and other assays requiring SA detection.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous Gram-positive bacterium [1] and a food poisoning agent [2] that causes a variety of infections related to the human toxic shock syndrome and sudden infant death syndrome [3]. It can also cause serious infections, such as blood stream infections, pneumonia, or bone and joint infections. Here advanced diagnostic detection methods were recently developed, including one-step immune chromate graphic assay [4], gold nano particle based immune cromatographic assay [5], real-time nucleic-acid-sequence-based amplification assay [6], polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay [7], real-time PCR assay [8], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [9], and multiplex PCR reversed passive latex agglutination (RPLA) identification [10]. Recently some of these basic methods depend on complicated PCR amplification, electric separation, spectric adsorption and other detection systems demand. However, in this study, simplified voltammetric methods are tested, which do not require complicated separation, expensive amplification or detection systems.

2. Objectives

In this study, an attempt was made to simplify the modification probe and to directly conduct non-treated blood assay for SA diseases. The assay is fast, sensitive, and does not require any preparation. Moreover, mercury immobilized [11] on a carbon nanotube structure [12] was used, where we sought a carbon surface that has catalytic effects [13], a large surface area, and high electrical conductivity [14], and whose probe can react with the SA target. Redox [15,16] voltammograms [17,18] were obtained via the square wave (SW) stripping and cyclic [19] voltammetric reaction [20,21]. The analytical parameters were optimized, and the results achieved low detection ranges for the SA target. The developed methods can be applied in the direct assay of non-treated blood sera, and the final results can be used for organ monitoring, in-vivo diagnosis, and other assays requiring SA detection.

3. Study Design

3.1. Instrument, Reagent and MCN Preparation

Diagnostic circuits were carried out using a BVA 2 voltammetric workstation from the authors’ institute. External electromagnetic noise was blocked by grounding with a Faraday iron box. The carbon nanotube probe (outside diameter: 15–40 nm; length: 30–50 um) was obtained from Nanotech Co., Ltd. (Seoul, Korea), Choong Nam 330–816, South Korea by chemical vapor deposition (CVD); it was purified overnight prior to use, via magnetic stirring in a 2 M nitric-acid solution, and was washed using triple-distilled pure water. SA was obtained from the Culture Collection and Research Center of biological bank of Korea. SA was maintained on tryptic soy agar slants, grown overnight on soy agar, and continually cultured at 37 °C, 24 ± 2 h until a concentration of 109 colony-forming unit (CFU) mL−1 was reached (N = 6). It was diluted to 3 × 102~5 × 102 CFU/1 ml using 0.85% NaCl electrolyte. The MCN working electrode was made using paste consisting of a mixture of 40 wt% carbon nanotube, 40 wt% Hg (standard 1000 ppm from Sigma), and 20 wt% reagent-grade mineral oil (for conductivity and water proof, NJ, USA, 1-800-01, Acro). The mixed paste was inserted into a 3-mm-diameter, 100-mm-long catheter capillary and was stabilized with a 10-cycle scan from 1.0 V initial potential to −1.0 V switching potential, at a 0.5 V/s scan rate, in an electrolyte solution. Voltammetric assay was performed using the three-electrode system. A 3.0-mm-diameter graphite pencil electrode (GC) was prepared from common pencil lead (DongA XQ, ceramic, 60 mm, 0.9 B). A 1.0-mm-diameter, 10-mm-long platinum metal wire working electrode was made, and GC was used as an Ag/AgCl/KCl reference and platinum counter electrode. This three electrode system was immersed in a solution of 1.0-mL non-treated human blood serum as an electrolyte solution. All the experiments were performed at room temperature, without removing the oxygen. Human blood and patient sera were obtained from the National Blood Transfusion Research Institute.

3.2. Cyclic Properties of the GC and MCN

Voltammetric reaction potentials depend on the anodic and cathodic adsorption electro transfer activities. Therefore, the peak potential was sought in the 1.0-mL patient serum electrolyte. Three-electrode systems and the prepared sensor probes were directly inserted, after which multifid scanning was performed on the common-type GC and metal Pt, and the MCN probes were compared using cyclic redox scan. Figure 1 shows the real voltammograms of the common-type GC, Pt, and specified MCN probes, using the same blood sera and identical parameters. In the anodic scan, only probe oxidation with no signals appeared, but in the redox scan, two peaks appeared at 0.8 and −0.2 V only in the MCN and GC electrodes, and Pt had only one peak. The peak currents are shown in the figure. The peaks were 0.126 × 10−4 A MCN, 0.0992 × 10−4 A GC, and 0.107 × 10−4 A Pt. The immobilized-mercury effect is more sensitive than that of the common-type electrode. The results of this study can be applied to stripping voltammetry; thus, using the same cell systems, stripping voltammetric scan was performed on anodic and cathodic activities, and the parameters that were used were −2.0 V initial potential, 2.0 V final potential, and 30 s accumulation time. Each voltammogram was obtained only for 0.047 × 10−4 MCN, 0.059 × 10−4 A GC, and 0.05 × 10−4 Pt anodic, and not for the cathodic results. Moreover, the study results indicate that MGC is more sensitive than Pt and GC (results not shown). The peak potential was used for the diagnostic assay of SA for the human blood, then more expanded analytical properties were examined using square-wave stripping voltammetry.

4. Results

4.1. Stripping Voltammetric SA and Positive Patient Sera Using MCN

Under optimum conditions, the diagnostic working ranges were examined using SA spiking in the healthy sera. In the 1.0 × 10 ³ L healthy plasma, sequential addition was performed with 240 s accumulation stripping time. Figure 2 shows the voltammetric results.
Under MCN probe, Figure 2A shows the voltammetric anodic peak current for the cyclic (white curve) and stripping (black curve) voltammetric anodic scan. Here, a cyclic peak of 0.29 × 10−4 A appeared at the 0.5 V reduction potential, which later increased to 0.076×10−4 A, where the linear curve was y = 0.0233x + 0.00220 and R2 = 0.9613, whose slope is more sensitive than that of stripping voltammetry. Moreover, the stripping slope was △x/△y = 0.0066, the intercept was 0.0008, and the statistic was R2 = 0.9856. Both equations can be used for diagnostics. Thus, the more sensitive parameters of the accumulation effects were examined using MCN, and Figure 2B shows the results, as follows: anodic peak high for time variation (-●-), 30–240 s; accumulation potential variation effects (-○-), −2.0 to −0.6 V. Peak currents of 0.007–0.047 × 10−4 A were obtained, and 240 s was the maximum accumulation time. Moreover, the stripping potential varied from 0.0038 to 0.0289×10−4 A, and −2.0 V was the maximum stripping potential. Thus, the 240 s accumulation time and −2.0 V stripping potential were fixed. Under these conditions, the probe stability was examined via repeated stripping. Figure 2C shows the peak currents for the sera blank and 0.1-mL SA spiked voltammograms. The blank current varied from 0.014 to 0.011 × 10−4 A, and the 0.1-mL SA spikes were 0.047–0.067 × 10−4 A. MCN is thus stable and can be used for diagnostics, with the final parameters fixed at −2.0 V accumulation potential, 0.02 V amplitude, 25 Hz frequency, 0.01 V incremental potential, and 240 s accumulation time, using the conditions under which the analytical working ranges were examined.

4.2. Diagnostic Working Ranges of SA

Under CV conditions, the linear working voltammetrics were sought at the 0.5- to 4.0-mL spikes. The reduction peak is shown in Figure 3A. Only a 0.2 V reduction peak appeared, and the first peak was that of the electrolyte blood serum. There were no signals at the 0.5-mL spike, then a peak of 0.0013 × 10−4 A was obtained at the 1-mL spike, with 0.2 V reduction potential, which continually increased to a peak of 0.7921 × 10−4 A at the 4-ml spike, with a slop of dx/dy = 0.192, an intercept of 0.012, and a relative statistic of 0.9947. The error percentage is shown on this curve. These results can be applied to diagnostics. Moreover, at the same spike range, a linear curve was obtained at seven points. Figure 3B shows the real voltammograms, where the first curve (for the electrolyte blood serum) is simple, then very small peaks were obtained at the 0.5- and 1.0-mL spikes, after which a 0.0044 × 10−4 A peak was obtained at the 1.5-mL spike. Moreover, at the 4-mL spike, a peak of 0.021 × 10−4 A was obtained, whose final curve was y = 0.005x − 0.002 and whose statistic was R2 = 0.9649. Under these conditions, the accumulation times that were used were 90 and 210 s for CV and SW stripping accumulation, respectively. As the SW effects were found to be much more sensitive than the CV effects, the former can be used for diagnostics. Under these conditions, the interference effects were calibrated using the standard addition methods, after which diagnostics was applied to the patients’ sera.

4.3. Patient Diagnosis

Under a sera solution, diagnostic application was performed on the patient plasma, via SW anodic stripping voltammetry. The contaminated serum sample was obtained from the National Blood Transfusion Research Institute. Figure 4A shows real voltammograms for 1.0-mL blood testing. The first curve represents the contaminated blood. In the 0.2 V anodic scan, a small peak current of 0.0072 × 10−4 A was obtained, using 90 s accumulation stripping, then standard SA was spiked to 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5 mL. The peak current linearly increased from 0.0113 to 0.0408 × 10−4 A. The regression equation was y = 0.006x − 0.006, and the relative standard deviation was R2 = 0.9918, which could be detected for 6.0-ul SA. Then more advanced tests were performed using a red corpuscle. Figure 4B shows the results of the use of the standard addition methods, where the first curve represents the red blood cells using optimum parameters. A peak current of 0.0009 × 10−4 A was obtained, and 0.0021–0.0055 × 10−4 A peak currents were obtained at the 1-, 2-, and 3-mL SA spikes. The working equation was y = 0.0016x − 0.0008, the statistic was R2 = 0.9922, and the content was 0.8ul. The results of the study can be used for diagnostics in any application.

5. Conclusions

A novel SA bioprocess was developed using an MCN sensor in non-treated human blood and patient sera. The immobilized-mercury effects were found to be more sensitive than those of the common probe type using cyclic voltammetry, where the following optimum analytical parameters were obtained: −2.0 V accumulation potential, 0.02 V amplitude, 25 Hz frequency, 0.01 V incremental potential, and 240 s accumulation time. Under these conditions, the standard deviation of the 0.1-m (15 × 102~25 × 102 CFU) SA was 0.0078%. This result was more sensitive and precise than other existing methods [21,22,23]. The results of this study can be applied to a diagnostic assay for positive patient sera and SA infections, and can be used in real-time medical diagnosis as well as in direct in-vivo monitoring.

Author Contributions

This study was designed by S.Y.L. and experimented by I.H.C., K.J.C., J.H.K., K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the original data in this article are from Biosensor Research Institute.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the data provided by all the staff.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

SAStaphylococcus aureus
MCNmercury immobilized on a carbon nanotube sensor
SWstripping voltammetry
PCRpolymerase chain reaction
GCgraphite pencil electrode
RPLAreversed passive latex agglutination
CFUcolony-forming unit
CVDchemical vapor deposition
CVCyclic voltammetry

References

  1. Cremonesi, P.; Perez, G.; Pisoni, G.; Moroni, P.; Morandi, S.; Luzzana, M.; Brasca, M.; Castiglioni, B. Detection of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus isolates in raw milk cheese. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 586–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bernardo, K.; Fleer, S.; Pakulat, N.; Krut, O.; Hunger, F.; Kronke, M. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus exotoxins by combined sodium dodecyl sulfate gelelectrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2002, 2, 740–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zorgani, A.; Essery, S.D.; Madani, O.A.; Bentley, A.J.; James, V.S.; MacKenzie, D.A.C.; Keeling, J.W.; Rambaud, C.; Hilton, J.; Blackwell, C.C.; et al. Detection of pyrogenic toxins of Staphylococcus aureus in sudden infant death syndrome. FEMS Immunol. Med. Mic. 1999, 25, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, S.H.; Wei, H.C.; Lee, Y.C. One step immunochromatographic assay for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Food Control 2007, 18, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, S.H. Gold nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for the detection of Staphylococcus aureus. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2007, 127, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grady, J.O.; Lacey, K.; Glynn, B.; Smith, T.J.; Barry, T.; Maher, M. tmRNA a novel high copy number RNA diagnostic target its application for Staphylococcus aureus detection using real time NASBA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 301, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wada, M.; Lkhagvadorj, E.; Bian, L.; Wang, C.; Chiba, Y.; Nagata, S.; Shimizu, T.; Yamashiro, Y.; Asahara, T.; Nomoto, K. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assay for the rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cattoir, V.; Merabet, L.; Djibo, N.; Rioux, C.; Legrand, P.; Girou, E.; Lesprit, P. Clinical impact of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus and determination of methicillin resistance from positive blood cultures. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 425–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fox, L.K.; Adams, D.S. The ability of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect antibody against Staphylococcus aureus in milk following experimental intramammary infection. J. Vet. Med. B 2000, 47, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zouharova, M.; Rysanek, D. Multiplex PCR and RPLA identification of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxigenic strains from bulk tank milk. Zoonoses Public Health 2008, 55, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ly, S.Y. Real-time voltammetric assay of cadmium ions in plant tissue and fish brain core. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2006, 10, 1613–1615. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ly, S.Y. Diagnosis of copper ions in vascular tracts using a fluorine doped carbon nanotube sensor. Talanta 2008, 74, 1635–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ly, S.Y.; Cho, N.S. Diagnosis of human hepatitis B virus in non-treated blood by the bovine IgG DNA linked carbon nanotube biosensor. J. Clin. Virol. 2009, 44, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ly, S.Y.; Lee, J.H. Human-urine diabetes assay and in vivo rat bladder assay using a fluorine doped carbon nanotube catheter sensor. Ann. Biomed. Engl. 2009, 37, 2028–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Thangamani, G.; Deshmukh, J.K.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Chidambaram, K.; Ahamed, M.; Ponnamma, D.; AlMaadeed, M.A.A.; Pasha, S.K.K. Recent advances in electrochemical biosensor and gas sensors based on graphene and carbon nanotubes (CNT)-A. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2017, 8, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lenka, L.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Kasak, P.; Tkac, J. Ti3C2 MXene-based nanobiosensors for detection of cancer biomarkers. In Novel Nanomaterials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sultan, Ş.; Ünlü, C.; Trabzon, L. Affinity biosensors developed with quantum dots in microfluidic systems. Emerg. Mater. 2021, 4, 187–209. [Google Scholar]
  18. Amene, S.; Rezaei, N. Biosensing surfaces and therapeutic biomaterials for the central nervous system in COVID-19. Emerg. Mater. 2021, 1, 293–312. [Google Scholar]
  19. Manjunatha, J.G.; Swamy, B.E.K.; Mamatha, G.P.; Shankar, S.S.; Gilbert, O.; Chandrashekar, B.N.; Sherigara, B.S. Electrochemical response of dopamine at phthalic acid and triton X-100 modified carbon paste electrode: A cyclic voltammetry study. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2009, 4, 1469–1478. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hareesha, N.; Manjunatha, J.G. Electro-oxidation of formoterol fumarate on the surface of novel poly(thiazole yellow-G) layered multi-walled carbon nanotube paste electrode. Sci. Rep. 2021, 17, 12797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. David, P.K.; Kimani, C.N.; Katabazi, F.A.; Okeng, A.; Okee, M.S.; Nanteza, A.; Joloba, M.L.; Najjuka, F.C. Identification of Staphylococcus aureus: DNase and Mannitol salt agar improve the efficiency of the tube coagulase test. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2010, 9, 23. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wu, S.; Duan, N.; Gu, H.; Hao, L.; Ye, H.; Gong, W.; Wang, Z. A review of the methods for detection of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins 2016, 8, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Gonçalves, E.; Carvalhal, R.; Mesquita, R.; Azevedo, J.; Coelho, M.J.; Magalhães, R.; Pia Ferraz, M.; Manso, M.C.; Gavinha, S.; Pina, C.; et al. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA/MSSA) in surfaces of dental medicine equipment. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 27, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of the MCN (A), GC (B), and Pt (C) probes in an SV 1.0 × 10³ L patient serum, with 30 s accumulation time, −2.0 V initial potential, 2.0 V switching potential, 0.1 V/s scan rate, and the ionic oxidation peak current (D).
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of the MCN (A), GC (B), and Pt (C) probes in an SV 1.0 × 10³ L patient serum, with 30 s accumulation time, −2.0 V initial potential, 2.0 V switching potential, 0.1 V/s scan rate, and the ionic oxidation peak current (D).
Molecules 27 01837 g001
Figure 2. (A) Analytical working variations for the 0.5-, 1.0-, 1.5-, 2.0-, 2.5-, 3.0-, and 3.5-ul SA add in 1-mL serum using the MCN working electrode for CV -○- and SW -●-. (B) SW accumulation time variation for 30, 60, 80, 120, 150, 180, 210, and 240 s -●-, and SW accumulation potential variation for −2.0, −1.8, −1,6, −1.4, −1.2, −1.0, −0.8, and −0.6 V -○-. (C) Statistic MCN probe stability in serum blank and SA spike. Other parameters were used for the optimum conditions.
Figure 2. (A) Analytical working variations for the 0.5-, 1.0-, 1.5-, 2.0-, 2.5-, 3.0-, and 3.5-ul SA add in 1-mL serum using the MCN working electrode for CV -○- and SW -●-. (B) SW accumulation time variation for 30, 60, 80, 120, 150, 180, 210, and 240 s -●-, and SW accumulation potential variation for −2.0, −1.8, −1,6, −1.4, −1.2, −1.0, −0.8, and −0.6 V -○-. (C) Statistic MCN probe stability in serum blank and SA spike. Other parameters were used for the optimum conditions.
Molecules 27 01837 g002aMolecules 27 01837 g002b
Figure 3. (A) Cyclic linear voltammograms for the 0 × 10³, 0.5 × 10³, 1.0 × 10³, 1.5 × 10³, 2.0 × 10³, 2.5 × 10³, 3.0 × 10³, 3.5 × 10³, and 4.0 × 10³ L SA spikes. (B) Cathodic stripping voltametric working ranges of the 0.5 × 10³, 1.0 × 10³, 1.5 × 10³, 2.0 × 10³, 2.5 × 10³, 3.0 × 10³, 3.5 × 10³, and 4.0 × 10³ L SA spikes in a 1.0 × 10³ L non-treated blood serum with a pH of 7.0 and 0.02 V SW amplitude, 75 Hz SW frequency, 0.01 V increment potential, −2.0 V accumulation potential, and 90 s (CV) and 210 s (SW) accumulation times. The optimum conditions were set for the other parameters.
Figure 3. (A) Cyclic linear voltammograms for the 0 × 10³, 0.5 × 10³, 1.0 × 10³, 1.5 × 10³, 2.0 × 10³, 2.5 × 10³, 3.0 × 10³, 3.5 × 10³, and 4.0 × 10³ L SA spikes. (B) Cathodic stripping voltametric working ranges of the 0.5 × 10³, 1.0 × 10³, 1.5 × 10³, 2.0 × 10³, 2.5 × 10³, 3.0 × 10³, 3.5 × 10³, and 4.0 × 10³ L SA spikes in a 1.0 × 10³ L non-treated blood serum with a pH of 7.0 and 0.02 V SW amplitude, 75 Hz SW frequency, 0.01 V increment potential, −2.0 V accumulation potential, and 90 s (CV) and 210 s (SW) accumulation times. The optimum conditions were set for the other parameters.
Molecules 27 01837 g003aMolecules 27 01837 g003b
Figure 4. Positive patient test. (A) Anodic stripping for the 1.0 × 10³ L patient sera, where the stripping conditions were 25 Hz frequency, 20 mV amplitude, −2.0 V accumulation potential, 100 s accumulation time, and 20 × 10³ V increment potential. (B) The standard addition methods used on the patients’ red cells, using the optimum SW conditions.
Figure 4. Positive patient test. (A) Anodic stripping for the 1.0 × 10³ L patient sera, where the stripping conditions were 25 Hz frequency, 20 mV amplitude, −2.0 V accumulation potential, 100 s accumulation time, and 20 × 10³ V increment potential. (B) The standard addition methods used on the patients’ red cells, using the optimum SW conditions.
Molecules 27 01837 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, I.H.; Choi, K.J.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, K.; Ly, S.Y. Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Molecules in Non-Treated Blood Using Mercury Immobilized Carbon Nanotube Sensor. Molecules 2022, 27, 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061837

AMA Style

Cho IH, Choi KJ, Kim JH, Lee K, Ly SY. Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Molecules in Non-Treated Blood Using Mercury Immobilized Carbon Nanotube Sensor. Molecules. 2022; 27(6):1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061837

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, In Hea, Kwang Jin Choi, Ji Hyun Kim, Kyung Lee, and Suw Young Ly. 2022. "Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Molecules in Non-Treated Blood Using Mercury Immobilized Carbon Nanotube Sensor" Molecules 27, no. 6: 1837. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061837

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop