Next Article in Journal
Self-Assembled Monolayer of Monomercaptoundecahydro-closo-dodecaborate on a Polycrystalline Gold Surface
Next Article in Special Issue
Health Benefits of Quercetin in Age-Related Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
The Dysregulation of the Renin–Angiotensin System in COVID-19 Studied by Serum Proteomics: Angiotensinogen Increases with Disease Severity
Previous Article in Special Issue
PLA Nanofibers for Microenvironmental-Responsive Quercetin Release in Local Periodontal Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 8
10.3390/molecules27082494
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antimicrobial Activity of Quercetin: An Approach to Its Mechanistic Principle

by
Thi Lan Anh Nguyen
and
Debanjana Bhattacharya
*
Biology Department, Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University, 5414 Brittany Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(8), 2494; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082494
Submission received: 15 March 2022 / Revised: 4 April 2022 / Accepted: 7 April 2022 / Published: 12 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quercetin: From Structure to Health Issues)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Quercetin, an essential plant flavonoid, possesses a variety of pharmacological activities. Extensive literature investigates its antimicrobial activity and possible mechanism of action. Quercetin has been shown to inhibit the growth of different Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi and viruses. The mechanism of its antimicrobial action includes cell membrane damage, change of membrane permeability, inhibition of synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins, reduction of expression of virulence factors, mitochondrial dysfunction, and preventing biofilm formation. Quercetin has also been shown to inhibit the growth of various drug-resistant microorganisms, thereby suggesting its use as a potent antimicrobial agent against drug-resistant strains. Furthermore, certain structural modifications of quercetin have sometimes been shown to enhance its antimicrobial activity compared to that of the parent molecule. In this review, we have summarized the antimicrobial activity of quercetin with a special focus on its mechanistic principle. Therefore, this review will provide further insights into the scientific understanding of quercetin’s mechanism of action, and the implications for its use as a clinically relevant antimicrobial agent.

1. Introduction

Quercetin is an important phytochemical, belonging to the flavonoid group of polyphenols. It is widely distributed in various fruits, vegetables, beverages as well as in flowers, leaves, seeds, etc. [1,2,3]. The most abundant source of quercetin is onion (Allium cepa), which is one of the most popular vegetables used both as an edible and medicinal plant. Other sources of quercetin include tea, red wine, kales and apples [4]. Many medicinal plants such as Hypericum perforatum, Ginkgo biloba also contain quercetin [3]. The molecular formula of quercetin is C15H10O7, and its chemical structure is illustrated in Figure 1. Its molecular structure contains a ketocarbonyl group, and the oxygen atom present on the first carbon, being basic, can form salts with acids. Furthermore, a dihydroxy group between the A ring, o-dihydroxy group B, C ring C2, C3 double bond, and 4-carbonyl are the active groups present in quercetin. Quercetin’s biological activities have been largely attributed to these active phenolic hydroxyl groups and double bonds [3].
Quercetin possesses many pharmacological activities such as antioxidant [1,5], anticancer, antiviral, antimicrobial, neuroprotection, anti-inflammatory, cardiovascular and anti-obesity [1]. Recently, quercetin has also achieved GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) status by the United States Food and Drug Organization [6]. The antimicrobial activity of quercetin has been widely studied by many researchers and has been considered as a potential therapy against different pathogenic microorganisms [1]. In addition, multidrug resistance (MDR) in bacteria has become a major problem worldwide due to the continuous use of antibiotics against bacterial infections. Treatment of these MDR strains has posed a major challenge to the pharmaceutical industry [7]. However, bioactive compounds isolated from different plants, fruits, vegetables, beverages, etc., have gained recent interest in the scientific community due to their beneficial effects in human health [8]. The mechanism of antimicrobial action of these phytochemicals has been extensively investigated currently, in order to utilize them effectively in drug development. Studies on the pharmaceutical properties of quercetin have shown that it can be formulated as a potent natural antimicrobial agent against various pathogenic microorganisms.
In this review, we have summarized the antimicrobial activity of quercetin, with a special focus on its underlying mechanistic principle. Therefore, this review will help future researchers to have a scientific understanding of quercetin’s role in inhibiting microbial diseases as well as its application as a potential antimicrobial agent in the clinical world.

2. Antimicrobial Activity

Quercetin is antibacterial against a wide range of bacterial strains, particularly those affecting the gastrointestinal, respiratory, urinary, and integumentary systems [9,10,11]. Quercetin’s antibacterial ability has been linked to its solubility [12] and its interplay with the bacterial cell membrane [13], which is largely determined by the presence of quercetin’s hydroxyl groups [1]. In general, Gram-negative bacteria are more resistant to the bactericidal effects of quercetin than Gram-positive bacteria [14]. The discrepancy in quercetin susceptibility between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria might be partially attributable to the difference in cell membrane composition between the two types of bacteria [1]. However, some quercetin derivatives showed stronger antibacterial ability against Gram-negative than Gram-positive bacteria [1]. Phosphorylation and sulfation of quercetin at different hydroxyl groups were able to enhance or reduce its solubility, and thus altered its antibacterial potential to certain types of bacteria [1,15].
The antibacterial activity of quercetin and quercetin derivatives against different bacterial species occurred at different minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Shu, et al. observed quercetin’s antibacterial effects on the growth of eleven main oral pathogenic microbes: quercetin impeded the growth of six out of the eleven tested microbes including Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus acidophilu, Streptococcus sanguis, Actinobacillus actinomycetemocomitans, and Prevotella intermedia with MIC ranging from 1–8 mg/mL [9]. S. mutans growth was inhibited on adhesive–dentin interfaces doped with quercetin at MIC of 500 µg/mL [16]. Quercetin also exerted inhibitory effects against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa at MIC of 20 mcg/mL [2]. Moreover, quercetin-5,3′-dimethylether exhibited antibacterial effects against Micrococcus luteus and Shigella sonei at MIC of 25 mcg/mL [17]. Quercetin was also shown to exert antibacterial activities against different Gram-positive bacteria such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) and Standard Enterococcus [18].
In addition, quercetin acted synergistically in combination with other chemotherapeutic compounds and antibiotics to inhibit the growth of bacteria [19,20,21]. When Pseudomonas fluorescens, a bacterium implicated in food spoilage, was treated with quercetin along with lactoferrin and hydroxyapatite, the MIC was significantly reduced compared with when the bacteria were treated with quercetin alone [19]. Quercetin further proved its antibacterial ability when working in conjunction with other antibiotics against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. [20].

3. Antifungal Activity

Although quercetin’s antifungal effects are not as well documented as its antibacterial properties, quercetin has been reported to have antifungal potentials against Aspergillus fumigatus (16–64 μM) [21] and Aspergillus niger [22].
Quercetin sensitized other drugs against resistant fungal infections [11,23,24]. Oliveira, et al. found quercetin’s antifungal potentials against Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans to be insignificant. However, when combined with amphotericin B, quercetin significantly enhanced amphotericin B’s antifungal efficacy against C. neoformans strains and reduced amphotericin B’s side effects, which Oliveira, et al. explained may be due to quercetin’s antioxidant effects [11]. Similarly, Gao, et al. showed that almost no cell death occurred when fluconazole-resistant C. albicans was treated with quercetin alone, while cell death was increased significantly when fluconazole-resistant C. albicans was treated with a quercetin–fluconazole combination [23]. Quercetin’s antifungal activity was also observed against Candida spp. [25], C. albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [18].

4. Antiviral Activity

Quercetin and its derivatives have long been studied for their antiviral effects. In vitro, quercetin and its derivatives were antiviral against a variety of viruses including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), poliovirus, Sindbis virus [13], respiratory viruses [13,26,27], and Mayarovirus [28]. In vivo, when administered orally, quercetin offers mice infected with Mengo virus some level of protection against lethal infections [26].
In vitro, quercetin enhanced acyclovir’s antiviral ability against herpesviruses [28]. In vivo, when used with vitamin C, quercetin helped prevent and treat patients with early respiratory tract infections, especially including COVID-19 patients [26,29]. A clinical study showed that when treated with Quercetin Phytosome, patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms had shorter time to virus clearance [30]. Quercetin was also found to exert antiviral activity against several serotypes of Rhinovirus, Coxsackievirus (A21 and B1), Poliovirus (type 1 Sabin) and Echovirus (type 7, 11, 12, and 19) [31].

5. Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity

5.1. Disruption of Bacterial Cell Walls and Cell Membrane

Recent studies have demonstrated that quercetin has the ability to effectively disrupt the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane, thereby inhibiting bacterial growth. Using TEM analysis, Wang, et al. [14] observed that quercetin effectively disrupted the structural integrity of cell wall and cell membrane of E. coli and S. aureus at concentrations of 50× MIC and 10× MIC, respectively. In treated E. coli, the damaged cell wall showed numerous structural abnormalities such as prominent lysis of cell wall, cell distortion, leakage of cytoplasmic materials, cytoplasmic membrane separated from the cell wall, as well as uneven endochylema density. Eventually, cell cavitation and cell death were evident. Similarly, in treated S. aureus, significant disruption of the cell wall, thinning of cell membranes, chromatin lysis, leakage of endochylema contents, uneven endochylema density, shedding of extracellular pilli, as well as nuclear cavitation were noted [14]. In this study, the basic mechanism of antibacterial activity was disruption of the permeability of bacterial cell walls and cell membranes, as detected by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and β-galactosidase activities [14]. Another research group, Zhao et. al. [32], determined potent antibacterial activity of sugarcane bagasse (containing 470 mg quercetin/g polyphenol) extract against S. aureus, E. coli, Listeria monocytogenes and Salomonella typhimurium. The primary antibacterial mechanism was found to be disruption of the cell membrane structure and permeability due to an increase in electrical conductivity, thereby leading to leakage of cellular electrolytes. Results showing damage of cellular proteins were also obtained from protein gel electrophoresis. Moreover, abnormalities in cell morphology and damage of internal structures were evident from SEM and TEM images in E. coli and S. aureus suspensions treated with their respective MICs, as compared with the untreated ones [32].
In another study, quercetin-loaded nanoparticles significantly inhibited the growth of drug-resistant E. coli and Bacillus subtilis, causing disruption of the cell wall and membrane, as determined by AFM, SEM and TEM analyses [33]. Quercetin also produced growth inhibitory activity against ceftazidime-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes; the main mechanisms being damage to the cytoplasmic membrane, disappearing of peptidoglycan, and distortion of cell shape [34]. Quercetin was also found to disrupt the cell membrane structure and integrity in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii [35] as well as carbapenem-resistant E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae [36].

5.2. Disruption of Nucleic Acid Synthesis

Quercetin also plays an important role in inhibiting the synthesis of nucleic acids in bacterial cells. It has been found that quercetin was able to inhibit the function of E. coli DNA gyrase, thereby leading to disruption of DNA synthesis [13,37,38]. In a recent study, Plaper, et al. [39] reported that quercetin inhibited the ATPase activity of E. coli DNA gyrase enzyme by binding to the submit GyrB. In this study, they determined the enzyme- binding activity of quercetin by measuring the fluorescence of isolated DNA gyrase subunits in both the presence and absence of quercetin. The binding site was found to be overlapped with that of ATP and the antibiotic novobiocin. Quercetin fluorescence was inferred when these compounds were added to the test samples, resulting in a competitive inhibition of quercetin’s activity. Inhibition of ATPase activity of GyrB was also determined by a coupled ATPase assay [39]. Therefore, from these studies, it can be said that quercetin’s ability to inhibit the function of DNA gyrase enzyme is partially responsible for its antibacterial activity.
Furthermore, Liu, et al. [40] predicted that the antibacterial mechanism of quercetin against the growth of Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp in laying hens was by inhibiting the DNA supercoiling activity of gyrase. This ultimately led to disruption of bacterial DNA replication. These findings were in agreement with the results of Ohemeng, et al. [38] and supported the fact that the inhibition of DNA gyrase activity might be partially responsible for the antibacterial activity of quercetin.
In a recent study [41], it was shown that quercetin in a complex with iron was able to intercalate with DNA and cause significant cleavage of the supercoiled form of DNA into nicked circular form. Here, the antibacterial mechanism of quercetin was attributed to its nuclease activity. Quercetin was also found to bind to bacterial single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein (SSB) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, thereby inhibiting bacterial DNA synthesis [42].

5.3. Inhibition of Biofilm Formation

Another antibacterial mechanism of quercetin is prevention of biofilm formation by various bacterial species. Quercetin is known to interfere with the pathways involved in bacterial quorum sensing, thereby preventing bacterial adhesion to target organs [3]. In a recent study, quercetin was found to inhibit almost 95% of the biofilm production of Enterococcus faecalis, a Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen [43]. In this study, quercetin showed antibacterial activity at sub-MIC values, and its biofilm inhibitory activity was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Furthermore, the authors used proteomics analysis and real-time PCR to determine that quercetin interfered with the proper functioning of the proteins involved in glycolytic, protein folding and protein translation–elongation pathways, thereby disrupting cell physiology and preventing biofilm formation [43]. In another study by Dias da Costa Júnior, et al. [44], quercetin displayed anti-biofilm activity and inhibited almost 50% of biofilm production of methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus at sub-MIC doses.
Recent studies have demonstrated that quercetin effectively inhibits the quorum sensing mechanism in P. aeruginosa primarily by decreasing its biofilm formation, swimming motility and production of various virulence factors such as protease, elastase, pyocyanin [45]. These results also agree with that of Manner, et al. [46]. They have also reported that quercetin was able to significantly inhibit the production of the pigment violacein, an indicator if bacterial quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum, thereby affecting the bacterial quorum-sensing mechanism. Quercetin was also found to interfere with the swarming and swimming motility of P. aeruginosa, thus inhibiting bacterial biofilm formation and quorum sensing [46]. Recently, it was found that a nanoparticle complex made up of quercetin and chitosan (quercetin-chitosan nanoplex) affected bacterial quorum sensing by significantly inhibiting the biofilm formation and swimming motility of P. aeruginosa [47]. The biofilm formation of a common oral pathogen S. mutans, which is the main causative agent of caries, was also inhibited by quercetin [48]. Moreover, quercetin inhibited the biofilm formation of drug-resistant S. aureus as well as suppressed the expression of bacterial adhesion genes [49]. Quercetin was found to inhibit biofilm production of L. monocytogenes by affecting surface colonization and by reducing cell attachment and secretion of extracellular proteins [50,51].
According to Kim, et al. [52], the biofilm production of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faceium was inhibited by about 70% by a quercetin–pivaloxymethyl conjugate. They also found that this conjugate showed a synergistic effect with several antibiotics such as vancomycin, ampicillin and cefepime against resistant strains of Staphylococcus and Enterococcus [52]. Quercetin inhibited the biofilm formation of the Gram-positive bacteria Bacillus subtilis FB17 [53]. Vanaraj, et al. [54] found that quercetin–silver nanoparticles effectively inhibited quorum sensing by decreasing the production of violacein in the reporter bacterium C. violaceum as well as reducing the formation of biofilm and expression of virulence genes in multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In another study by Yang, et al. [16], it was found that quercetin-doped adhesive was able to inhibit the biofilm formation of the Streptococcus mutans strain Ingbritt.
Anti-biofilm activity of quercetin was also observed against multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa [55], Streptococcus pneumoniae D39 by inhibiting the activity of sortase A [56], P. aeruginosa by affecting the lasIR quorum sensing system via vfr [57], Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Vibrio harveyi [58], Staphylococcus epidermidis by downregulating the expression of intercellular adhesion proteins [59] and a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610, enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC) strain 55989, P. aeruginosa (P. a.) strain PA14, E. coli K12 strain AR3110 [60] as well as Porphyromas gingivalis, the causative bacterium of periodontal disease [61]. In another study, onion extracts rich in quercetin and its derivatives inhibited the swarming motility and violacein production in P. aeruginosa PAO1, and Serratia marcescens MG1 [62].

5.4. Reduction of Expression of Virulence Factors

Additionally, quercetin possesses the ability to reduce the activities of several essential virulent enzymes, thereby hindering bacterial virulence. From the studies of He, et al. [61], it was observed that quercetin was able to inhibit the virulence factors such as gingipain proteases, haemagglutinin, hemolytic activities of P. gingivalis in a dose-dependent manner. According to Wang, et al. [63], quercetin inhibited the activity of coagulase enzyme, an essential virulence factor of S. aureus, thereby protecting rats from catheter-related Stapylococcul infections. Quercetin in combination with the antibiotic meropenem was found to inhibit the expression of the virulence factors blaNDM and AdeB in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii [36]. Furthermore, quercetin–meropenem combination inhibited the expression of the virulence factors blaVIM and ompC in the clinical isolates of E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae belonging to the carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae family [37].
In a recent study, quercetin was shown to downregulate the expression of virulence genes sigB, prfA, inlA, inlC, and actA in L. monocytogenes [51]. Furthermore, quercetin was found to inhibit the activity of the virulence factor pneumolysin of Streptococcus pneumoniae [64].
The mechanism of antibacterial activity of quercetin is illustrated in Figure 2.

6. Mechanism of Antifungal Activity

The antifungal activity of quercetin has also been studied recently. Although little research work has been conducted on its antifungal activity, the mechanisms mainly include disruption of the plasma membrane and inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis, protein synthesis and mitochondrial functions [65]. The recent studies describing quercetin’s antifungal mechanism are summarized in Table 1.
The mechanism of antifungal activity of quercetin is illustrated in Figure 3.

7. Mechanism of Antiviral Activity

Quercetin has been shown to possess significant antiviral properties in recent research works. The primary mechanism of its antiviral activity includes blocking of essential viral enzymes such as polymerases, reverse transcriptase, proteases, integrase, along with suppression of DNA gyrase, and binding viral capsid proteins [13,29,71]. The relevant experiments describing quercetin’s antiviral mechanism are demonstrated in Table 2.
The antiviral mechanism of quercetin is illustrated in Figure 4.

8. Bioavailability of Quercetin

Although quercetin has been reported to have significant antimicrobial activity, it has relatively low bioavailability. This is because it has poor solubility in water, limited permeability, it is unstable in stomach and intestine, and it has relatively short biological half-life [87]. One study showed that free quercetin could not be found in human plasma even after an oral administration of high concentration of quercetin [88]. Phase 2 metabolism significantly affects quercetin’s bioavailability in humans due to the fact that it is extensively metabolized in liver prior to reaching the systemic circulatory system [87,89]. All these factors are responsible for causing low oral bioavailability of quercetin, thereby hindering its applications as a pharmaceutical agent. Therefore, research has been conducted to develop suitable delivery systems that would not only increase the bioavailability of quercetin but also produce significant therapeutic effects, thereby enhancing its biological activities [87]. These delivery systems would protect quercetin molecules in the upper gastrointestinal tract and help in its prolonged release in the colon in order to increase its bioavailability [90].

9. Merits and Demerits

Quercetin, an essential plant flavonoid, is well known for its several pharmacological properties. Its broad spectrum antimicrobial activity and mode of action is well studied, which suggests its use as a potent antimicrobial agent in the clinical world. Some of the advantages of using phytochemicals against infectious microorganisms are that these natural compounds cause less side effects to the host compared to antibiotics, and the microorganisms become less drug resistant. However, there are several disadvantages of using these phytochemicals. Sometimes, quercetin was found to be less effective than antibiotics, and its activity increased in combination with antibiotics. In some studies, it was seen that structural modification of quercetin increased its activity significantly versus the parent molecule. Moreover, the oral bioavailability and absorption of quercetin in the human body is poor, which limits its use as a therapeutic agent.

10. Conclusions and Future Prospects

From the extensive research works conducted in the past few years, it can be concluded that quercetin exhibits potent antimicrobial activity against a variety of bacteria, fungi and virus. The mechanism of its antimicrobial activity primarily includes disruption of cell membrane integrity, inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis, inhibition of biofilm formation, mitochondrial dysfunction and inhibition of virulence factor expression. Furthermore, the continuous emergence of multidrug resistance in microorganisms has necessitated the search for new antimicrobial agents with a targeted mode of action, causing less side effects. Many phytochemicals isolated from different natural sources have been seen to exhibit therapeutic potentials against a number of different microorganisms; quercetin being one of the most popular and biologically active among them. The existing literature suggests broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities of quercetin, and therefore, it may be considered as a potentially useful antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral nutraceutical. However, its poor oral bioavailability and absorption in the human body hinders its use as an effective antimicrobial agent. Further work is required to enhance its bioavailability in order to exploit its therapeutic potential. Moreover, research in mechanism-based experiments, structural modification of quercetin, and investigation of the interaction between quercetin and its target sites will lead to the design of more potent antimicrobial quercetin derivatives in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B.; Methodology, D.B.; Investigation, T.L.A.N. and D.B.; Resources, T.L.A.N. and D.B.; Data Curation, T.L.A.N. and D.B.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, T.L.A.N., D.B.; Writing—Review and Editing, D.B.; Supervision, D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The article processing charges for this article were funded by the Endowed Professorship program of Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University for distributing grant funds from the Louisiana Board of Regents, specifically, the Sr Ann Young Endowed Professorship.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Natalie Lenard of the Biology Department at Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University for her critical review of the preliminary manuscript draft.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Osonga, F.J.; Akgul, A.; Miller, R.M.; Eshun, G.B.; Yazgan, I.; Akgul, A.; Sadik, O.A. Antimicrobial Activity of a New Class of Phosphorylated and Modified Flavonoids. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 12865–12871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jaisinghani, R.N. Antibacterial properties of quercetin. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 8, 13–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Yang, D.; Wang, T.; Long, M.; Li, P. Quercetin: Its Main Pharmacological Activity and Potential Application in Clinical Medicine. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 30, 8825387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, S.J.; Kim, G.H. Quantification of Quercetin in different parts of onion and its DPPH radical scavenging and antibacterial activity. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2006, 15, 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ozgen, S.; Kilinc, O.K.; Selamoglu, Z. Antioxidant Activity of Quercetin: A Mechanistic Review. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 1134–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Magar, R.T.; Sohng, J.K. A Review on Structure, Modifications and Structure-Activity Relation of Quercetin and Its Derivatives. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alekshun, M.N.; Levy, S.B. Molecular mechanisms of antibacterial multidrug resistance. Cell 2007, 128, 1037–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Yamasaki, S.; Asakura, M.; Neogi, S.B.; Hinenoya, A.; Iwaoka, E.; Aoki, S. Inhibition of virulence potential of Vibrio cholerae by natural compounds. Indian J. Med. Res. 2011, 133, 232–239. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Feng, J.; Lou, B.; Zhou, X.; Wu, H. Antibacterial activity of quercetin on oral infectious pathogens. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2011, 5, 5358–5361. [Google Scholar]
  10. David, A.V.A.; Arulmoli, R.; Parasuraman, S. Overviews of Biological Importance of Quercetin: A Bioactive Flavonoid. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2016, 10, 84–89. [Google Scholar]
  11. Oliveira, V.M.; Carraro, E.; Auler, M.E.; Khalil, N.M. Quercetin and rutin as potential agents antifungal against Cryptococcus spp. Braz. J. Biol. 2016, 76, 1029–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hooda, H.; Singh, P.; Bajpai, S. Effect of quercetin impregnated silver nanoparticle on growth of some clinical pathogens. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 31, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cushnie, T.P.T.; Lamb, A.J. Antimicrobial activity of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 26, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, S.; Yao, J.; Zhou, B.; Yang, J.; Chaudry, M.T.; Wang, M.; Xiao, F.; Li, Y.; Yin, W. Bacteriostatic effect of quercetin as an antibiotic alternative in vivo and its antibacterial mechanism in vitro. J. Food Prot. 2018, 81, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ahmad, A.; Kaleem, M.; Ahmed, Z.; Shafiq, H. Therapeutic potential of flavonoids and their mechanism of action against microbial and viral infections—A review. Food Res. Int. 2015, 77, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yang, H.; Li, K.; Yan, H.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, C. High-performance therapeutic quercetin-doped adhesive for adhesive–dentin interfaces. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Martini, N.D.; Katerere, D.R.P.; Eloff, J.N. Biological activity of five antibacterial flavonoids from Combretum erythrophyllum (Combretaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, K.; Xing, S.; Wang, M.; Peng, Y.; Dong, Y.; Li, X. Anticomplement and antimicrobial activities of flavonoids from Entada phaseoloides. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 867–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Montone, A.M.I.; Papaianni, M.; Malvano, F.; Capuano, F.; Capparelli, R.; Albanese, D. Lactoferrin, quercetin, and hydroxyapatite act synergistically against Pseudomonas fluorescens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Amin, M.U.; Khurram, M.; Khattak, B.; Khan, J. Antibiotic additive and synergistic action of rutin, morin and quercetin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 15, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Yin, J.; Peng, X.; Lin, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gao, H.; Tian, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, G. Quercetin ameliorates Aspergillus fumigatus keratitis by inhibiting fungal growth, toll-like receptors and inflammatory cytokines. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 93, 107435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Abd-Allah, W.E.; Awad, H.M.; AbdelMohsen, M.M. HPLC Analysis of Quercetin and Antimicrobial Activity of Comparative Methanol Extracts of Shinus molle L. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015, 4, 550–558. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gao, M.; Wang, H.; Zhu, L. Quercetin assists fluconazole to inhibit biofilm formations of fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans in in vitro and in vivo antifungal managements of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 40, 727–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Singh, B.N.; Upreti, D.K.; Singh, B.R.; Pandey, G.; Verma, S.; Roy, S.; Naqvi, A.H.; Rawat, A.K.S. Quercetin sensitizes fluconazole-resistant Candida albicans to induce apoptotic cell death by modulating quorum sensing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 2153–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Herrera, C.L.; Alvear, M.; Barrientos, L.; Montenegro, G.; Salazar, L.A. The antifungal effect of six commercial extracts of Chilean propolis on Candida spp. Cien. Inv. Agric. 2010, 37, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Biancatelli, R.M.L.C.; Berrill, M.; Catravas, J.D.; Marik, P.E. Quercetin and Vitamin C: An Experimental, Synergistic Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Related Disease (COVID-19). Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Uchide, N.; Toyoda, H. Antioxidant therapy as a potential approach to severe influenza-associated complications. Molecules 2011, 16, 2032–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Dos Santos, A.E.; Kuster, R.M.; Yamamoto, K.A.; Salles, T.S.; Campos, R.; de Meneses, M.D.; Soares, M.R.; Ferreira, D. Quercetin and quercetin 3-O-glycosides from Bauhinia longifolia (Bong.) Steud. show anti-Mayaro virus activity. Parasit Vectors 2014, 7, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Agrawal, P.K.; Agrawal, C.; Blunden, G. Quercetin: Antiviral Significance and Possible COVID-19 Integrative Considerations. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pierro, F.D.; Iqtadar, S.; Khan, A.; Mumtaz, S.U.; Chaudhry, M.M.; Bertuccioli, A.; Derosa, G.; Maffioli, P.; Togni, S.; Riva, A.; et al. Potential Clinical Benefits of Quercetin in the Early Stage of COVID-19: Results of a Second, Pilot, Randomized, Controlled and Open-Label Clinical Trial. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 2807–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ishitsuka, H.; Ohsawa, C.; Ohiwa, T.; Umeda, I.; Suhara, Y. Antipicornavirus flavone Ro 09-0179. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1982, 22, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhao, Y.; Chen, M.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, S. The antibiotic activity and mechanisms of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) bagasse extract against food-borne pathogens. Food Chem. 2015, 185, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Z.; Li, N.; Mou, Z.; Sun, D.; Cai, Y.; Wang, W.; Lin, Y. Quercetin loading CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles as efficient antibacterial and anticancer materials. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2017, 167, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Siriwong, S.; Thumanu, K.; Hengpratom, T.; Eumkeb, G. Synergy and mode of action of ceftazidime plus quercetin or luteolin on Streptococcus pyogenes. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2015, 2015, 759459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Pal, A.; Tripathi, A. Quercetin potentiates meropenem activity among pathogenic carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1038–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pal, A.; Tripathi, A. Demonstration of bactericidal and synergistic activity of quercetin with meropenem among pathogenic carbapenem resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 143, 104120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ohemeng, K.A.; Schwender, C.F.; Fu, K.P.; Barrett, J.F. DNA gyrase inhibitory and antibacterial activity of some flavones (1). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hossion, A.M.; Zamami, Y.; Kandahary, R.K.; Tsuchiya, T.; Ogawa, W.; Iwado, A.; Sasaki, K. Quercetin diacylglycoside analogues showing dual inhibition of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV as novel antibacterial agents. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 3686–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Plaper, A.; Golob, M.; Hafner, I.; Oblak, M.; Solmajer, T.; Jerala, R. Characterization of quercetin binding site on DNA gyrase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 306, 530–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, H.N.; Liu, Y.; Hu, L.L.; Suo, Y.L.; Zhang, L.; Jin, F.; Feng, X.A.; Teng, N.; Li, Y. Effects of dietary supplementation of quercetin on performance, egg quality, cecal microflora populations, and antioxidant status in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Raza, A.; Xu, X.; Xia, L.; Xia, C.; Tang, J.; Ouyang, Z. Quercetin-Iron Complex: Synthesis, Characterization, Antioxidant, DNA Binding, DNA Cleavage, and Antibacterial Activity Studies. J. Fluoresc. 2016, 26, 2023–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lin, E.S.; Luo, R.H.; Huang, C.Y. A Complexed Crystal Structure of a Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein with Quercetin and the Structural Basis of Flavonol Inhibition Specificity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qayyum, S.; Sharma, D.; Bisht, D.; Khan, A.U. Identification of factors involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm under quercetin stress. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 126, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Júnior, S.D.D.C.; Santos, J.V.D.O.; Campos, L.A.D.A.; Pereira, M.A.; Magalhães, N.S.S.; Cavalcanti, I.M.F. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of quercetin against clinical isolates of Staphyloccocus aureus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus with resistance profile. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotech. 2018, 3, 1948–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Ouyang, J.; Sun, F.; Feng, W.; Sun, Y.; Qiu, X.; Xiong, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y. Quercetin is an effective inhibitor of quorum sensing, biofilm formation and virulence factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 120, 966–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Manner, S.; Fallarero, A. Screening of natural product derivatives identifies two structurally related flavonoids as potent quorum sensing inhibitors against gram-negative bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tran, T.T.; Hadinoto, K. A Potential Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor for Bronchiectasis Therapy: Quercetin-Chitosan Nanoparticle Complex Exhibiting Superior Inhibition of Biofilm Formation and Swimming Motility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the Native Quercetin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zeng, Y.; Nikitkova, A.; Abdelsalam, H.; Li, J.; Xiao, J. Activity of quercetin and kaempferol against Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 98, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, J.H.; Park, J.H.; Cho, H.S.; Joo, S.W.; Cho, M.H.; Lee, J. Anti-biofilm activities of quercetin and tannic acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Biofouling 2013, 29, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vazquez-Armenta, F.J.; Bernal-Mercado, A.T.; Tapia-Rodriguez, M.R.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Lopez-Zavala, A.A.; Martinez-Tellez, M.A.; Hernandez-Oñate, M.A.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F. Quercetin reduces adhesion and inhibits biofilm development by Listeria monocytogenes by reducing the amount of extracellular proteins. Food Control 2018, 90, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vazquez-Armenta, F.J.; Hernandez-Oñate, M.A.; Martinez-Tellez, M.A.; Lopez-Zavala, A.A.; Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Gutierrez-Pacheco, M.M.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F. Quercetin repressed the stress response factor (sigB) and virulence genes (prfA, actA, inlA, and inlC), lower the adhesion, and biofilm development of L. monocytogenes. Food Microbiol. 2020, 87, 103377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kim, M.K.; Lee, T.G.; Jung, M.; Park, K.H.; Chong, Y. In Vitro Synergism and Anti-biofilm Activity of Quercetin-Pivaloxymethyl Conjugate against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus Species. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 66, 1019–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bordeleau, E.; Mazinani, S.; Nguyen, D.; Betancourt, F.; Yan, H. Abrasive treatment of microtiter plates improves the reproducibility of bacterial biofilm assays. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 32434–32439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Vanaraj, S.; Keerthana, B.B.; Preethi, K. Biosynthesis, Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles Using Quercetin from Clitoria ternatea L to Enhance Toxicity against Bacterial Biofilm. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2017, 27, 1412–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vipin, C.; Mujeeburahiman, M.; Ashwini, P.; Arun, A.B.; Rekha, P.D. Anti-biofilm and cytoprotective activities of quercetin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 464–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, J.; Song, M.; Pan, J.; Shen, X.; Liu, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.; Deng, X. Quercetin impairs Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilm formation by inhibiting sortase A activity. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2018, 22, 6228–6237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ouyang, J.; Feng, W.; Lai, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Rong, L.; Sun, F.; Chen, Y. Quercetin inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation via the vfr-mediated lasIR system. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 149, 104291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vikram, A.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Jesudhasan, P.R.; Pillai, S.D.; Patil, B.S. Suppression of bacterial cell-cell signalling, biofilm formation and type III secretion system by citrus flavonoids. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mu, Y.; Zeng, H.; Chen, W. Quercetin Inhibits Biofilm Formation by Decreasing the Production of EPS and Altering the Composition of EPS in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 631058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pruteanu, M.; Hernández Lobato, J.I.; Stach, T.; Hengge, R. Common plant flavonoids prevent the assembly of amyloid curli fibres and can interfere with bacterial biofilm formation. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 5280–5299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. He, Z.; Zhang, X.; Song, Z.; Li, L.; Chang, H.; Li, S.; Zhou, W. Quercetin inhibits virulence properties of Porphyromas gingivalis in periodontal disease. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Quecan, B.X.V.; Santos, J.T.C.; Rivera, M.L.C.; Hassimotto, N.M.A.; Almeida, F.A.; Pinto, U.M. Effect of Quercetin Rich Onion Extracts on Bacterial Quorum Sensing. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, L.; Li, B.; Si, X.; Liu, X.; Deng, X.; Niu, X.; Jin, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, J. Quercetin protects rats from catheter-related Staphylococcus aureus infections by inhibiting coagulase activity. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 4808–4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Lv, Q.; Zhang, P.; Quan, P.; Cui, M.; Liu, T.; Yin, Y.; Chi, G. Quercetin, a pneumolysin inhibitor, protects mice against Streptococcus pneumoniae infection. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 140, 103934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Aboody, M.S.A.; Mickymaray, S. Anti-Fungal Efficacy and Mechanisms of Flavonoids. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Bitencourt, T.A.; Komoto, T.T.; Massaroto, B.G.; Miranda, C.E.S.; Beleboni, R.O.; Marins, M.; Fachin, A.L. Trans-chalcone and quercetin down-regulate fatty acid synthase gene expression and reduce ergosterol content in the human pathogenic dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 13, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Kwun, M.S.; Lee, D.G. Quercetin-induced yeast apoptosis through mitochondrial dysfunction under the accumulation of magnesium in Candida albicans. Fungal Biol. 2020, 124, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cassetta, A.; Stojan, J.; Krastanova, I.; Kristan, K.; Brunskole Švegelj, M.; Lamba, D.; Lanišnik Rižner, T. Structural basis for inhibition of 17 β -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases by phytoestrogens: The case of fungal 17β-HSDcl. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 171, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. da Silva, C.R.; de Andrade Neto, J.B.; de Sousa Campos, R.; Figueiredo, N.S.; Sampaio, L.S.; Magalhães, H.I.; Cavalcanti, B.C.; Gaspar, D.M.; de Andrade, G.M.; Lima, I.S.; et al. Synergistic effect of the flavonoid catechin, quercetin, or epigallocatechin gallate with fluconazole induces apoptosis in Candida tropicalis resistant to fluconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1468–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rocha, M.F.G.; Sales, J.A.; da Rocha, M.G.; Galdino, L.M.; de Aguiar, L.; Pereira-Neto, W.A.; de Aguiar Cordeiro, R.; Castelo-Branco, D.S.C.M.; Sidrim, J.J.C.; Brilhante, R.S.N. Antifungal effects of the flavonoids kaempferol and quercetin: A possible alternative for the control of fungal biofilms. Biofouling 2019, 35, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Di Petrillo, A.; Orrù, G.; Fais, A.; Fantini, M.C. Quercetin and its derivates as antiviral potentials: A comprehensive review. Phytother. Res. 2022, 36, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kim, H.J.; Woo, E.R.; Shin, C.G.; Park, H. A new flavonol glycoside gallate ester from Acer okamotoanum and its inhibitory activity against human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) integrase. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kaul, T.N.; Middleton, E., Jr.; Ogra, P.L. Antiviral effect of flavonoids on human viruses. J. Med. Virol. 1985, 15, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Liu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Li, W.; Shen, L.; Huang, S.; Tang, J.; Duan, J.; Fang, F.; Huang, Y.; Chang, H.; et al. Computational screen and experimental validation of anti-influenza effects of quercetin and chlorogenic acid from traditional Chinese medicine. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Liu, Z.; Zhao, J.; Li, W.; Wang, X.; Xu, J.; Xie, J.; Tao, K.; Shen, L.; Zhang, R. Molecular docking of potential inhibitors for influenza H7N9. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2015, 2015, 480764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fatima, K.; Mathew, S.; Suhail, M.; Ali, A.; Damanhouri, G.; Azhar, E.; Qadri, I. Docking studies of Pakistani HCV NS3 helicase: A possible antiviral drug target. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e106339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Mathew, S.; Fatima, K.; Fatmi, M.Q.; Archunan, G.; Ilyas, M.; Begum, N.; Azhar, E.; Damanhouri, G.; Qadri, I. Computational Docking Study of p7 Ion Channel from HCV Genotype 3 and Genotype 4 and Its Interaction with Natural Compounds. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Bachmetov, L.; Gal-Tanamy, M.; Shapira, A.; Vorobeychik, M.; Giterman-Galam, T.; Sathiyamoorthy, P.; Golan-Goldhirsh, A.; Benhar, I.; Tur-Kaspa, R.; Zemel, R. Suppression of hepatitis C virus by the flavonoid quercetin is mediated by inhibition of NS3 protease activity. J. Viral Hepat. 2012, 19, e81–e88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rojas, Á.; del Campo, J.A.; Clement, S.; Lemasson, M.; García-Valdecasas, M.; Gil-Gómez, A.; Ranchal, I.; Bartosch, B.; Bautista, J.D.; Rosenberg, A.R.; et al. Effect of Quercetin on Hepatitis C Virus Life Cycle: From Viral to Host Targets. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hung, P.Y.; Ho, B.C.; Lee, S.Y.; Chang, S.Y.; Kao, C.L.; Lee, S.S.; Lee, C.N. Houttuynia cordata targets the beginning stage of herpes simplex virus infection. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0115475. [Google Scholar]
  81. Cho, W.K.; Weeratunga, P.; Lee, B.H.; Park, J.S.; Kim, C.J.; Ma, J.Y.; Lee, J.S. Epimedium koreanum Nakai displays broad spectrum of antiviral activity in vitro and in vivo by inducing cellular antiviral state. Viruses 2015, 7, 352–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Zandi, K.; Teoh, B.T.; Sam, S.S.; Wong, P.F.; Mustafa, M.R.; Abubakar, S. Antiviral activity of four types of bioflavonoid against dengue virus type-2. Virol. J. 2011, 8, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Chaabi, M. Antiviral Effects of Quercetin and Related Compounds. Naturopathic Currents, Special Edition, April 2020, Antiviral Effects of Quercetin and Related Compounds. 2020. Available online: https://naturopathiccurrents.com/sites/default/files/AntiviralEffectsofQuercetinandRelatedCompounds_0.pdf (accessed on 11 April 2022).
  84. Wu, W.; Li, R.; Li, X.; He, J.; Jiang, S.; Liu, S.; Yang, J. Quercetin as an Antiviral Agent Inhibits Influenza A Virus (IAV) Entry. Viruses 2015, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Alomair, L.; Almsned, F.; Ullah, A.; Jafri, M.S. In Silico Prediction of the Phosphorylation of NS3 as an Essential Mechanism for Dengue Virus Replication and the Antiviral Activity of Quercetin. Biology 2021, 10, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Liu, M.; Yu, Q.; Xiao, H.; Li, M.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, P. The Inhibitory Activities and Antiviral Mechanism of Medicinal Plant Ingredient Quercetin Against Grouper Iridovirus Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 586331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Salehi, B.; Machin, L.; Monzote, L.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Ezzat, S.M.; Salem, M.A.; Merghany, R.M.; El Mahdy, N.M.; Kılıç, C.S.; Sytar, O.; et al. Therapeutic Potential of Quercetin: New Insights and Perspectives for Human Health. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 11849–11872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Graefe, E.U.; Wittig, J.; Mueller, S.; Riethling, A.K.; Uehleke, B.; Drewelow, B.; Pforte, H.; Jacobasch, G.; Derendorf, H.; Veit, M. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of quercetin glycosides in humans. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2001, 41, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Thilakarathna, S.H.; Rupasinghe, H.P. Flavonoid bioavailability and attempts for bioavailability enhancement. Nutrients 2013, 5, 3367–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mukhopadhyay, P.; Prajapati, A.K. Quercetin in anti-diabetic research and strategies for improved quercetin bioavailability using polymer-based carriers—A review. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 97547–97562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 27 02494 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular structure of quercetin.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of quercetin.
Molecules 27 02494 g001
Molecules 27 02494 g002 550
Figure 2. Antibacterial mechanism of quercetin.
Figure 2. Antibacterial mechanism of quercetin.
Molecules 27 02494 g002
Molecules 27 02494 g003 550
Figure 3. Antifungal mechanism of quercetin.
Figure 3. Antifungal mechanism of quercetin.
Molecules 27 02494 g003
Molecules 27 02494 g004 550
Figure 4. Antiviral mechanism of quercetin.
Figure 4. Antiviral mechanism of quercetin.
Molecules 27 02494 g004
Table
Table 1. Antifungal mechanism of quercetin.
Table 1. Antifungal mechanism of quercetin.
Fungus NameMechanism of ActionReferences
Trichophyton rubrumDownregulated the enzyme fatty acid synthase and reduced ergosterol levels, thereby causing plasma membrane disruption[66]
C. albicansInduced apoptosis with increase in intracellular magnesium along with mitochondrial dysfunction. Mitochondrial antioxidant system was disrupted due to increased levels of intracellular ROS and decreased intracellular redox levels. DNA damage was also observed.[67]
Cochliobolus lunatusInhibition of nucleic acid synthesis[68]
Candida tropicalisInduced apoptosis, caused morphological changes, disruption of membrane integrity, increase in intracellular ROS, mitochondrial depolarization and DNA damage in combination with the antibiotic fluconazole.[69]
C. albicansWhen combined with fluconazole, quercetin inhibited biofilm formation by downregulating the expression of biofilm-forming genes. The combination also inhibited cell adhesion, cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH), flocculation, fungal metabolism, yeast-to-hypha transition.[23]
C. albicansDownregulated virulence factors such as biofilm formation, hemolytic activity, activities of the enzymes, proteinase, phospholipase, and esterase, as well as hyphal development. Quercetin in combination with fluconazole induced fungal cell death by apoptosis.[24]
Candida parapsilosis complexInhibited biofilm formation[70]
Table
Table 2. Antiviral mechanism of quercetin.
Table 2. Antiviral mechanism of quercetin.
Virus NameMechanism of ActionReferences
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 strainInhibited the enzyme integrase[72]
Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV), Poliovirus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Sindbis virusInhibited viral polymerase and binding of viral capsid proteins or viral nucleic acid[13]
HSV-1Reduced infectivity, intracellular replication[73]
Polio-virus type 1Reduced infectivity, intracellular replication[73]
Parainfluenza virus type 3 (Pf-3)Reduced infectivity, intracellular replication[73]
RSVReduced infectivity, intracellular replication[73]
Influenza A H1N1Inhibited neuraminidase[74]
Influenza H7N9Inhibited neuraminidase[75]
Hepatitis C virus (HCV)Inhibited nonstructural protein 3 (NS3) of HCV helicase[76]
HCV genotypes 3 and 4Inhibited the function of p7 proteins[77]
HCVInhibited NS3 protease[78]
HCVDownregulated diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT)[79]
HSV-1Blocked viral binding and viral penetration to the host cell as well as inhibited the activation of NF-κB at the beginning of infection.[80]
HSV-2Blocked viral binding and viral penetration to the host cell as well as inhibited the activation of NF-κB at the beginning of infection.[80]
Acyclovir-resistant HSV-1Blocked viral binding and viral penetration to the host cell as well as inhibited the activation of NF-κB at the beginning of infection.[80]
Influenza A Virus (PR8)Reduced replication, induced the secretion of type I interferon (IFN) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro[81]
Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV)Reduced replication, induced the secretion of type I interferon (IFN) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro[81]
HSVReduced replication, induced the secretion of type I interferon (IFN) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro[81]
Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV)Reduced replication, induced the secretion of type I interferon (IFN) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines in vitro[81]
Influenza A subtypes (H1N1,
H5N2, H7N3, and H9N2)		Reduced replication, induced the secretion of type I interferon (IFN) and other pro-inflammatory cytokines in vivo[81]
Dengue virus type-2 (DENV-2)Inhibited replication, reduced the levels of ribonucleic acid (RNA)[82]
Influenza virusInferred with viral replication by blocking endocytosis, inhibiting the activity of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, inhibiting RNA polymerase and other proteins, increasing antiviral response of mitochondria.[83]
Influenza A viruses (IAVs)Inhibited the activity of hemagglutinin[84]
Dengue virusPhosphorylation of NS3[85]
Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV)Interfered with viral binding to target host cells[86]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, T.L.A.; Bhattacharya, D. Antimicrobial Activity of Quercetin: An Approach to Its Mechanistic Principle. Molecules 2022, 27, 2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082494

AMA Style

Nguyen TLA, Bhattacharya D. Antimicrobial Activity of Quercetin: An Approach to Its Mechanistic Principle. Molecules. 2022; 27(8):2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082494

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Thi Lan Anh, and Debanjana Bhattacharya. 2022. "Antimicrobial Activity of Quercetin: An Approach to Its Mechanistic Principle" Molecules 27, no. 8: 2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082494

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop