Next Article in Journal
Automation of Copper-Mediated 18F-Fluorination of Aryl Pinacol Boronates Using 4-Dimethylaminopyridinium Triflate
Previous Article in Journal
Direct Regeneration of Degraded LiFePO4 Cathode via Reductive Solution Relithiation Regeneration Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
User-Friendly and Responsive Electrochemical Detection Approach for Triclosan by Nano-Metal–Organic Framework
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Recent Excellent Optoelectronic Applications Based on Two-Dimensional WS2 Nanomaterials: A Review

Molecules 2024, 29(14), 3341; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143341
by Changxing Li, Dandan Sang *, Shunhao Ge, Liangrui Zou and Qinglin Wang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Molecules 2024, 29(14), 3341; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29143341
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Revised: 5 July 2024 / Accepted: 13 July 2024 / Published: 16 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials for Emerging Electrochemical Devices)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments:

- WS2 is N-type or p-type?

- What is the effect of N-type or p-type in optoelectronic applications?

- The disadvantages of WS2 and solutions for their overcome should be discussed in a new section.

- Synthesis methods of WS2 should be discussed.

- The effect of morphology on optoelectronic properties should be discussed.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Moderate editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Reviewer Comments:

The abstract must be improved, and more detail about the narration of the article must be added.

Why did the authors mention "latest 5 years" and cite 2016 refs?

It's crucial to include a section on the properties of WS2 before discussing its application. This will provide a solid foundation for the readers to understand the context and significance of the subsequent application.

Authors must include some of their own schemes for better understanding.

There is no table provided to compare the activity of WS2. When the authors describe sensors and other applications, they must provide tables with the recent reports on WS2 regarding the application.

Some of the keywords are not suitable.

The Intoduction is entirely unacceptable. No information about the material has been provided, and none of the recent achievements of the materials have been discussed.

Also, include a section about materials similar to WS2 for optoelectronic applications.

 

 

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Must be improved

Author Response

请参阅附件。

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Accept in present form

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have addressed all my comments well. This may be accepted after the editor's review.

 

Back to TopTop