Next Article in Journal
Studying the Effect of Reducing Agents on the Properties of Gold Nanoparticles and Their Integration into Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels
Previous Article in Journal
Organic Sunscreens—Is Their Placenta Permeability the Only Issue Associated with Exposure During Pregnancy? In Silico Studies of Sunscreens’ Placenta Permeability and Interactions with Selected Placental Enzymes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fabrication Methods of Continuous Pure Metal–Organic Framework Membranes and Films: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Modifications and Applications of Metal-Organic-Framework-Based Materials for Photocatalysis

by
Weimin Ma
,
Liang Yu
,
Pei Kang
,
Zhiyun Chu
and
Yingxuan Li
*
MIIT Key Laboratory of Critical Materials Technology for New Energy Conversion and Storage, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(24), 5834; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245834
Submission received: 18 October 2024 / Revised: 7 December 2024 / Accepted: 9 December 2024 / Published: 11 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Application of Periodic Frameworks)

Abstract

:
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) represent a category of crystalline materials formed by the combination of metal ions or clusters with organic linkers, which have emerged as a prominent research focus in the field of photocatalysis. Owing to their distinctive characteristics, including structural diversity and configurations, significant porosity, and an extensive specific surface area, they provide a flexible foundation for various potential applications in photocatalysis. In recent years, researchers have tackled many issues in the MOF-based photocatalytic yield. However, limited light adsorption regions, lack of active sites and active species, and insufficient efficiency of photogenerated charge carrier separation substantially hinder the photocatalytic performance. In this review, we summarized the strategies to improve the photocatalytic performance and recent developments achieved in MOF and MOF-based photocatalysis, including water splitting, CO2 conversion, photocatalytic degradation of pollutants, and photocatalytic nitrogen fixation into ammonia. In conclusion, the existing challenges and prospective advancements in MOF-based photocatalysis are also discussed.

1. Introduction

With the advancement of industrialization and the large consumption of fossil energy, such as petroleum, coal, and natural gas, environmental and energy problems have become increasingly prominent. Human beings are faced with severe challenges posed by nature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The pursuit of sustainable energy is a viable strategy to tackle the current energy crisis and environmental challenges by transforming inexhaustible solar energy into renewable clean fuel [6,7,8], which is a sustainable and clean source of energy. The conversion of sunlight into electric or chemical energy is an imperative matter for humanity. Since the discovery by Fujishima and Honda in 1972 of utilizing TiO2 photocatalyst for solar-driven water splitting to generate hydrogen [9], a great deal of effort has been invested into the search for efficient and stable photocatalysts, resulting in remarkable advancements. Up to now, a series of semiconductor materials have been developed, such as TiO2 [10,11], CdS [12,13,14], g-C3N4 [15,16,17,18], and Bi2S3 [19,20,21]. However, the photocatalytic activity of a traditional semiconductor is usually limited by the light absorption range and the efficiency of photogenerated carrier separation, and it is not ideal for the development to meet the energy demand and put it into industrial production; thus, developing new and efficient photocatalytic materials to replace traditional photocatalytic materials is imperative. Therefore, it is necessary to develop photocatalysts with a broad spectral light response and improve the separation efficiency of photogenerated carriers through microstructure regulation to achieve efficient photocatalytic reactions.
Metal–organic matrix materials (MOFs) are composed of metal cations or metal clusters coordinated with various organic connectors, resulting in a porous network structure in one, two, or three dimensions that exhibit a high specific surface area and porosity [22,23,24,25,26]. These materials have demonstrated promising applications and extensive utilization in gas separation [27], sensing [28,29], catalysis [30,31,32,33,34,35,36], drug delivery [37,38,39,40], and other fields. In comparison with traditional semiconductor materials, MOFs have been considered as a novel type of photocatalyst owing to the following advantages: (1) intrinsic pores and high specific surface area shortened the transport distance of charge carrier, and facilitate the diffusion efficiency of reactants and products, and significantly inhibit the recombination of photoexcited electron–hole pairs; (2) tunable structural components, can flexibly design and adjust the ligand to extend the light absorption region and investigate the interactions between different metals and MOF supports; (3) most importantly, MOFs possess a highly porous structure, allowing for the introduction of photosensitizers or cocatalysts [41,42], such as polyoxometalates (POMs) [43], metal nanoparticles [35,44,45,46], and semiconductors [47,48,49], which enhance the effective utilization of photogenerated electrons and holes, minimizing their recombination and thereby enhancing photocatalytic performance.
In order to enhance the catalytic performance of individual components, researchers have shifted their focus towards synthesizing composite materials, which can compensate for the limitations of their constituent components while leveraging their advantages, thereby exhibiting a broader range of potential applications. Herein, this review systematically provides recent development of MOF-based materials for photocatalysis, including NPs/MOFs [50,51,52,53,54], semiconductor/MOFs [55,56,57,58], and MOF-derived oxide or carbon composites [59,60,61,62]. Furthermore, we elaborately summarized the latest and most significant progress made in the field of photocatalytic water splitting, CO2 reduction, contaminant degradation, and nitrogen fixation into ammonia. Specifically, we analyzed the advancements in catalyst design, reaction mechanisms, efficiency improvement, and the potential applications of these technologies in addressing global energy and environmental challenges (Figure 1). Particularly, the current challenges and further development toward MOF in the photocatalytic field are also highlighted.

2. Strategies to Improve Photocatalytic Performance

2.1. Light Adsorption

Light absorption is the primary requirement in photocatalytic reactions. Sunlight consists of 4% ultraviolet light, 45% visible light, and 50% infrared light, with a significantly higher proportion of visible and infrared light compared to UV light [63]. Therefore, it is imperative to expand the adsorption range to visible and near-infrared regions, which enables more efficient utilization of sunlight. Consequently, extensive investigations have focused on broadening the light absorption capabilities of MOF materials for effective solar energy utilization.
Organic linker modulation can efficiently broaden the range of light harvesting. Silva and co-workers introduced the amino group into UiO-66 to prepared UiO-66-NH2, by replacing H2BDC with NH2-H2BDC [64]. The absorption band edge of UiO-66-NH2 is extended from 300 nm to a wide absorption range from 300 to 440 nm with the incorporation of an amino group. Compared with UiO-66-NH2, UiO-66 could not detect hydrogen generation, while UiO-66-NH2 could detect hydrogen generation. Although the quantum yield of 3.5% is not ideal, this work sets a precedent for MOF modification of organic ligands for photocatalytic hydrogen production, and also provides technical support for the subsequent use of MOFs for visible light catalytic hydrogen production.
Apart from organic ligands, metal ions, especially noble metal nanostructures, garnered significant attention because of their distinctive characteristics, including large optical field enhancement functions, leading to strong light scattering and absorption. For this purpose, Zhou and his partners chose a robust framework (MOF-253) as a prototype, and then implanted a platinum complex in MOF-253 to obtain a similar MOF-253-Pt complex (Figure 2a) [65]. The color of MOF-253 turned from white to bright yellow with Pt loaded. Obviously, the absorption range of MOF-253-Pt is wider than MOF-253, that is to say, MOF-253-Pt exhibits a unique absorption band at 410 nm and an extended edge to 650 nm due to PtCl2 binding with bipyridine (Figure 2b). The functionalized MOF-253-Pt is an effective photosensitizer and photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution, exhibiting a five-times-greater activity than its corresponding complex under visible light.
Rare-earth elements play an important role in various fields and are attracting more and more attention from scientists. Xu and co-workers reported that the modification of MOFs with rare-earth elements can broaden the absorption spectrum [33], and the electrons present in the unoccupied 4f orbital can serve as traps for photo-excited carriers, preventing the recombination of electron–hole pairs and thereby enhancing photocatalytic activity.
In order to investigate the effect of organic ligands on the light absorption of photocatalysts, UiO-66-X was used as a model, a combination of theoretical and experimental studies was conducted. Kevin Hendrickx and co-workers investigated the single- and double-functionalized linker (X = OH, NH2 (or SH)) to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the functionalization choices (Figure 2c). Calculations using static time-dependent density functional theory for the linker were integrated with molecular dynamics simulations, and these findings were contrasted with experimental UV–vis absorption spectra to clarify the electronic effects on the absorption properties. In comparison to the single-substituted variant, the double-substituted linker showed a more significant shift (Figure 2d), indicating its potential as a candidate for further investigation in photocatalysis. Subsequently, the interaction between the organic linker and the inorganic component of the framework was theoretically analyzed using cluster models. The study identified the ligand-to-metal charge transfer influenced by functionalization, revealing that linker modifications can adjust the band gap of UiO-66 from 4.0 to 2.2 eV. The periodic density of the examined state may elucidate the modulation of the band gap within the framework, which was influenced by functionalization occurring in the original UiO-66 host’s band gap.

2.2. Regulate Active Sites

Ligands and secondary building units are essential in MOFs, with metal ions or clusters serving as the primary active sites for photocatalysis. Recently, Lan and co-workers synthesized three stable isostructural MOFs by manipulating the types of metal ions (Ni, Co, and Cu) (Figure 3a), and then investigated the properties of photocatalytic CO2 reduction [66]. CO2 adsorption is the most critical step in the subsequent conversion, in which Co and Cu have a weak adsorption capacity for CO2, while MOF-Ni has strong binding with CO2, so MOF-Ni shows the highest activity and CO selectivity (Figure 3b). Furthermore, MOF-Ni has a high free energy barrier for H2 evolution (Figure 3c). The results revealed that the Ni(II) ion acted as an effective active site for CO2 reduction (Figure 3d). The mixed-metal strategy was achieved by adding new active centers into MOFs, which is an effective strategy to enhance the efficiency of photogenerated electron and hole separation, thereby boosting photocatalytic activity.
Ye and co-workers achieved modular optimization in MOFs by integrating coordinatively unsaturated single atoms into the porphyrin center, resulting in the metallization of Zn or Co to form new structures, MOF-525-Zn and MOF-525-Co [67]. It is worth noting that the newly MOF-525-Co shows the ability of selective adsorption and efficient conversion of CO2 to CO under visible light irradiation, which is much higher than that of modified MOF-525-Zn and the parent MOF-525. The difference in activity between MOF-525-Zn and MOF-525-Co is due to the separation efficiency of photogenerated electrons and holes, and further analysis is due to the different metals located in the porphyrin units. MOF-525-Co and MOF-525-Zn, which possess distinct active sites, enhance separation efficiency by promoting energy transfer from the porphyrin units to the lower-energy Co or Zn trap sites, thereby optimizing the electron transfer pathways to Zr oxo-clusters. Importantly, the current intensity observed in MOF-525-Co significantly exceeds that of MOF-525-Zn, and the diversity in catalytic active sites, and thus, accounts for different catalytic activity.

2.3. Charge Carrier Separation

The separation of charge carriers is also a crucial criterion for photocatalysis. The photocatalyst generates photo-induced electrons and holes upon photon absorption, driving the redox reactions and converting solar energy into chemical energy. In recent years, the emergence of MOFs has sparked a surge in research on utilizing these materials as photocatalysts. However, current studies indicate that the photocatalytic efficiency of MOF materials consistently falls short compared to traditional photocatalysts. The main issue is the ineffective separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs in MOF materials, resulting in significantly shortened lifetimes for these species and subsequently diminishing the photocatalytic performance.
The piezoelectric effect generates an internal electric field that has the potential to enhance transport routes of photogenerated charges during photocatalytic processes, thereby enhancing the photocatalytic activity. Fang and co-workers developed a novel piezoelectric photocatalytic heterojunction UiO-66-NH2@CdS [68], which was approximately four-times higher compared to the absence of ultrasound. The photocatalytic mechanism shows that piezoelectric polarization distorts the energy band of MOF, modifies charge transfer pathways, and mitigates electron–hole pair recombination, thereby enhancing hydrogen evolution performance. Recently, Jiang and co-workers synthesized UiO-66-NH2(Zr) and UiO-66-NH2(Hf), two isostructural MOFs with significantly different piezoelectric characteristics. Consequently, UiO-66-NH2(Hf) demonstrates approximately a 2.2-times-greater activity than UiO-66-NH2(Zr) under identical conditions [34].
Band bending is essential for the separation of photogenerated carriers. Wu and his partners proposed that the incorporation of cerium (Ce) into MOF materials can promote the separation efficiency of electron–hole pairs (Figure 4a) [69]. The classical MOF material UiO-66 (whose metal elements can be Zr, Hf, Th, Ti, U, or Ce) is calculated by density functional theory, and the ligand-to-metal charge transfer, which can separate the hole pairs of photogenerated electrons is found. The LMCT process is only thermodynamically advantageous in UiO-66(Ce) materials because Ce4+ in this material has a low-energy 4f empty orbital, which can be used to receive photogenerated electrons. Modifying the ligand (linker) of the UiO-66(Ce) material with groups such as NH2 can further regulate the electronic structure of the material (Figure 4b), improving its efficiency for certain specific photocatalytic reactions, such as photolytic water to produce hydrogen.
Recently, Jiang and co-workers first combined the metal oxides (MoO3 and V2O5) with MIL-125-NH2 (Figure 4c), leading to the improvement in the efficiency of charge carriers by establishment of a built-in electric field [58]. The MOF composites present higher photocatalytic H2 production activities than that of the pristine MOF. In comparison to MIL-125-NH2, the MoO3/MIL-125-NH2 and V2O5/MIL-125-NH2 composites exhibit notably stronger SPV signals, indicating a higher concentration of hole accumulation on the MOF surface (Figure 4d), while electrons migrate to Pt sites to facilitate proton reduction (Figure 4e). This finding clearly indicates that band bending takes place in the MOF, when it is combined with the oxides. In short, the deposition of Pt on the MOF further enhances the catalytic activity by facilitating electron transfer via the bent band (Figure 4f).

3. Applications for Photocatalysis

3.1. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution (HER)

H2 is a green renewable energy, and is the most ideal fuel to meet future energy demands. Solar-powered water decomposition to produce hydrogen is a promising approach to address the growing energy crisis and environmental problems. Photocatalytic cracking of water for hydrogen production has the following advantages: (1) Water resources as the most abundant and cleanest source on earth, serves as an ideal raw material. (2) The combustion of hydrogen yields a substantial amount of energy with environmentally friendly implications, and possesses a three-times-higher calorific value than that of gasoline [70]. (3) Utilizing clean and sustainable solar energy directly converts sunlight into hydrogen, thus establishing an efficient energy recycling platform, which is attractive for achieving human energy goals.
As a co-catalyst, Pt NPs are essential for charge separation and transport. Do the spatial distribution of Pt NPs and the relative position of MOFs have different catalytic effects? Due to its excellent porosity and adjustable pore structure, MOF materials have been widely used in photocatalytic water decomposition. The confined Pt NPs not only reduce the overpotential for hydrogen generation but also improve charge separation by creating a heterogeneous junction with the MOF support. Jiang and co-workers confined Pt NPs inside or loaded on the surface of the UiO-66-NH2, named as Pt@UiO-66-NH2 and Pt/UiO-66-NH2, respectively (Figure 5a) [51]. After introduction of Pt NPs, UiO-66-NH2 catalysts show superior photocatalytic performance for H2 production by enhancing electron transfer and suppressing charge recombination (Figure 5b–d). In that case, the photocatalytic efficiency correlates mainly with the position of decorated Pt. The Pt@UiO-66-NH2 markedly shorten the electron transfer distance from the MOF to Pt NPs, thereby improving charge-carrier utilization and leading to significantly enhanced hydrogen production in comparison to Pt/UiO-66-NH2.
Titania (TiO2), as the most classical photocatalyst, has been widely used in the field of photocatalytic hydrogen production via its high effectiveness and abundance. Ma and coworkers synthesized and utilized a series of multivariate Ti-MOF/COF hybrid materials for visible-light-driven photocatalytic H2 production (Figure 5e) [52]. Composite 2 achieves a H2 evolution rate of 13.98 μmol g−1 h−1, significantly outperforming both PdTCPP⸦PCN-415-(NH2) and TpPa (Figure 5f), highlighting the benefits of covalent linking. The covalent linkage between PdTCPP⸦PCN-415-(NH2) and TpPa enables efficient separation of photogenerated electrons and holes (Figure 5g), facilitating H+ reduction by Pt nanoparticles and hole capture by the electron acceptor SA, thereby completing the catalytic cycle.
Zhu and co-workers relied on the host–guest interactions and uneven charge distribution strategy, and constructed a novel MOF photocatalyst (C60@NU-901) by encapsulating C60 into a size-matched zirconium-based MOF, NU-901 [53]. By virtue of a robust built-in electric field, C60@NU-901 tends to demonstrate a 10.7- and 469-times-higher photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity than that found in benchmark NU-901 and C60 powder, achieving a maximum rate of 22.3 μmol g−1 h−1 under visible light irradiation (Figure 6). Correspondingly, the incorporation of C60 enhances exciton dissociation and free charge carrier generation, while the inherent electric field promotes their separation and transfer. Consequently, C60@NU-901 combined with high electron–hole separation efficiency and multi-path charge transfer, thereby significantly elevating the overall photocatalytic efficacy. The notion of enhancing charge separation via host–guest interactions offers a compelling strategy for the advancement of photocatalyst design, and realizes the efficient transformation of renewable solar energy into sustainable energy.

3.2. Photocatalytic Oxygen Reaction (OER)

In recent years, photocatalytic water decomposition is gaining attention for its direct conversion of solar energy into green renewable fuel. However, photocatalytic water oxidation is the rate-determining step in the process of water splitting to generate oxygen. The water oxidation reaction has slower kinetics compared to the hydrogen evolution half reaction both in natural and artificial photosynthesis due to factors such as high over-potential, multiple-electron transport, and the formidable energy barrier associated with O-O formation. Consequently, progress in developing efficient catalysts for the water oxidation half-reaction lags behind that of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Henceforth, improving the performance of photocatalytic water oxidation through simple and effective strategies is a key challenge in the field.
Yang and co-workers rationally designed and fabricated MIL-53(Fe)-2OH and MOF-74-Fe with and without uncoordinated phenolic hydroxyl groups (Figure 7a) [71], MIL-53(Fe)-2OH with desirable electronic structure and uncoordinated phenolic hydroxyls, demonstrates rapid OER kinetics with a low overpotential of 215 mV and a turnover frequency significantly higher than that of the commercial IrO₂ catalyst (Figure 7b,c). The reduced eg-t2g splitting of Fe-3d orbitals and electroactive O sites in MIL-53(Fe)-2OH enhance OER efficiency by decreasing overpotential (Figure 7d). The unique electronic structures of MIL-53(Fe)-2OH enhance the adsorption and desorption of oxygen intermediates, thus improving its catalytic activity and stability for OER compared to MOF-74-Fe (Figure 7e). Su and coworkers investigated three Fe-based MOFs-MIL-101(Fe), MIL-88B(Fe), and MIL-53(Fe)-as photocatalysts for the OER. Among these, MIL-101(Fe) exhibited remarkable photocatalytic efficacy for OER when Na2S2O8 served as the electron acceptor while [Ru(bpy)3]2+ acted as the photosensitizer. Ultimately, the holes generated by the catalyst were harnessed by water, leading to its oxidation and the generation of O2.

3.3. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction

3.3.1. Pristine MOF

CO2 is the main pollutant that causes the greenhouse effect, which affects climate change. At present, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has risen sharply to about 400 ppm, which has brought serious environmental problems. Consequently, mitigating CO2 levels in the atmosphere has become urgent. It is necessary to use inexhaustible solar energy as an energy input, so it is imperative to develop photocatalysts that can capture and achieve a CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR). MOF composites offer distinct advantages including enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity and facile adjustment of reaction selectivity through post-synthesis modification. Thus, the application of MOF composites presents a promising avenue for tackling this challenge.
The transformation of CO2 into high value-added fuels like methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), and formate (HCOO) embodies a remarkably promising technology that is expected to yield significant advantages in both the energy and environmental domains [59,60,61,63,66,67]. The process of photocatalytic CO2 reduction involves the utilization of abundant solar energy to cleave the robust C=O bonds and generate valued chemicals, which offers an ideal solution to the global energy crisis and environmental challenges.
Combined with a structure–property relationship, the metal sites in MOFs are pivotal for adjusting the photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance. Lin and co-workers constructed Ni MOF monolayers (Ni MOLs) for the photoreduction of diluted CO2 (Figure 8a) [72]. In a pure CO2 environment, Ni MOLs endowed with a wealth of coordinatively unsaturated Ni sites exhibited an impressive apparent quantum yield of 2.2% at 420 nm, coupled with [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2·6H2O as the photosensitizer and triethanolamine as the electron donor achieved an exceptional CO selectivity of 97.8%. Moreover, Ni MOLs achieved an impressive apparent quantum yield of 1.96% and remarkable CO selectivity of 96.8% even in diluted CO2 (10%) (Figure 8b). Ni MOLs enhance CO2 photoreduction efficiency by favoring strong CO2 adsorption and minimizing H2O interaction, leading to improved activity and selectivity (Figure 8c).
Recently, Sun and co-workers analyzed the influence of six distinct variants of MIL-125-NH2(Ti) through the exposure of individual low-index facets as well as the co-exposure of mixed facets on the photoreduction process of CO2 (Figure 9a) [73]. The low-index facets {001}, {110}, and {111} display unique morphologies: T1 as a disk-shaped plate, T2 as a rhombic dodecahedron, and T3 as an octahedron, respectively (Figure 9b). The heterojunction at the MIL-125-NH2(Ti) facet not only enhances light absorption but also accelerates the charge migration (Figure 9c). Due to the surface heterojunction formation, MIL-125-NH2(Ti) with co-exposed {110}/{111} facets achieves optimal CO and CH4 production rates, 10- and 18-times higher than T1 with only the {001} facet, and thus facilitates the interfacial charge transfer (Figure 9d,e). Therefore, regulating and optimizing facets are essential for photocatalytic performance, aiding in the initiation of reactions, promoting electron migration, and inhibiting charge recombination to enhance CO2 reduction.

3.3.2. MOF Composite

Coupling MOFs with conventional catalysts such as metal nanoparticles, semiconductor materials, or light-harvesting molecules to prepare composite materials is an effective way to improve the activity of photocatalytic conversion of CO2. MOFs with tunable porosity not only can enhance light absorption by modifying the arrangement and density of their active sites, but also allow for the optimization of pore size and surface area, and thus facilitate the diffusion and accessibility of reactant molecules to the active catalytic sites. By leveraging these advantages, MOFs with tunable porosity not only enhance photocatalytic activity but also expand the scope of applications, making them a versatile class of materials in sustainable catalysis. Combining conventional catalysts and MOFs in CO2 photocatalytic reduction effectively regulates active sites, accelerates carrier separation and migration, and enhances visible light absorption. In addition to light and CO2 absorption capacity, the efficiency of spatial separation of photo-generated electrons and holes is a crucial index. In general, encapsulated metal nanoparticles (MNPs) are used as electron acceptors, which can not only promote the transfer of photogenerated electrons from MOFs to MNPs, but also promote the electron–electron pore transfer by constructing type II heterojunction or type z heterojunction, thereby improving the photocatalytic performance.
Directly capturing and converting ultralow concentrations of atmospheric CO2 via photocatalytic route are highly required, and this sustainable technology holds great potential to achieve carbon neutrality in the future. The in situ transformation of captured CO2 eliminates energy costs, infrastructure needs, and expenses associated with CO2 separation while ensuring effective conversion of even trace amounts of CO2 from the air into valuable chemicals. Based on this concept, Li and co-workers created a novel Ni-MOF integrated with Pt (Pt/Ni-MOF) that selectively captures and concentrates atmospheric CO2 (Figure 10a), demonstrating remarkable efficiency in the thermal-photocatalytic conversion of CO2 with H2, even when exposed to infrared light [54]. The synergistic interaction between the dual-active sites of Pt and Ni enhances catalytic performance by facilitating non-competitive adsorption of H2 and CO2, with Ni promoting CO2 activation and photogenerated electrons driving H2 dissociation at the Pt sites (Figure 10b,c). Concurrently, thermal energy facilitates the migration of dissociated H2 to Ni sites, where adsorbed CO2 is thermally reduced to produce CO and CH4. Due to the metallic property of Pt/Ni-MOF, the catalyst achieved an unprecedented 9.57% efficiency at 940 nm for atmospheric CO2 conversion (Figure 10d), enabling independent CO2 procurement and improving energy efficiency by eliminating the need for regeneration of capture media and release of molecular CO2 (Figure 10e).
Infrared light, accounting for approximately 50% of the solar spectrum, is not effectively utilized. To solve this problem, metallic photocatalysts without energy gaps to enhance infrared light absorption for CO2 conversion were investigated. Another great challenge is to achieve single-product selectivity for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Xu and co-workers coupled the metallic nature of Co9S8 and the local CO2 concentrated capacity of UiO-66 to design a metallic photocatalyst UiO-66/Co9S8 composite (Figure 11a) [55], which shows observable IR-light photocatalytic CO2-to-CH4 conversion. UiO-66/Co9S8 produces CH4 at a rate of 25.7 μmol g−1 h−1 with nearly 100% selectivity under infrared light (Figure 11b,c). It is worth mentioning that Co9S8 features two distinct Co sites: Co1 with high electron density and Co2 with low electron density. The formation of *COOH is the rate-limiting step at both sites; however, Co1 has a lower energy for *COOH formation, facilitating further protonation of *CO and resulting in exceptionally high selectivity for CH4 (Figure 11d).

3.3.3. MOF Derived Materials

Photothermal hydrogenation of CO2 represents a promising approach to address energy and environmental challenges, but the photothermal CO2 hydrogenation reaction still needs to develop highly efficient and durable catalysts. MOF materials are considered as promising precursors or sacrificial templates for derived functional materials, such as metal NPs, metal oxides, metal sulfides, and their heterostructures, under the corresponding treatments. These derived materials typically retain the morphology and porosity characteristics of MOFs, accelerating the effective mass transport and charge transfer in catalytic processes, thereby leading to enhanced catalytic activity.
The direct transformation of CO2 into CH4 provides an eco-friendly method to reduce the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere, thereby reducing the dependence on non-renewable energy sources. The process is hindered kinetically at low temperatures due to high stability and reactive inertia of CO2. However, on a thermodynamic level, CO2 methanation is an exothermic reaction, and thus, it is imperative to lower the reaction temperature. Hu and co-workers developed the core–shell Co/MnO@PGC catalyst from calcinated bi-metal CoMn-MOF-74, which possesses abundant defects and oxygen vacancies and thus enhances CO2 adsorption and activation, enabling CH4 formation with over 99% selectivity and a STYCH4 of 0.14 μmol CH4 s−1 gcat−1 even at 160 °C [74]. The improved performance of Co/MnO@PGC can be ascribed to the synergistic interaction between Co0 and MnO at their heterointerface. Specifically, H2 is efficiently dissociated on Co0, while CO2 undergoes strong adsorption and activation on the adjacent MnO.
In addition to converting CO2 into gaseous products such as CO and methane, it is more attractive to convert CO2 into higher value-added chemicals, such as methanol (CH3OH), which is an important intermediate in chemical production. Huang and co-workers employed MIL-68(In) nanorods to synthesize hollow In2O3 nanotubes (h-In2O3) and prepare supported Pd catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation into methanol (Figure 12a) [59]; this result demonstrated that manipulating In2O3 morphology significantly affects the SMSI between Pd and In2O3, inducing different electronic states of Pd. Notably, the performance of Pd loaded on h-In2O3 was superior to that of In2O3 with other morphologies. This study demonstrates that regulating In2O3 morphology not only affects the electronic properties of Pd, but also affects the SMSI with In2O3, which are key factors contributing to enhanced catalytic performance (Figure 12b–d). Recently, Hu and co-workers developed a hollow In2O3@ZrO2 heterostructure through pyrolysis of MIL-68@UiO-66, achieving enhanced activity and stability for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol (Figure 12e). At the In2O3/ZrO2 heterointerfaces, electrons transfer from ZrO2 to In2O3, facilitating H2 dissociation and enabling the hydrogenation of formate and methoxy species into methanol through a specific reaction pathway: HCOO* → CH3O* → CH3OH* → CH3OH (g) (Figure 12f) [60].
The long-term stability and cyclic stability of catalysts are also important indicators to evaluate the catalysts. Photocatalysts utilizing metal nanoparticles derived from MOFs have exhibited outstanding efficacy in photocatalytic CO2 reduction processes. Ye and co-workers utilized MIL-101 as the precursor and developed an Fe@C nanostructure where plasmonic Fe nanoparticles were coated with ultrathin carbon layers [75]. The resulting Fe@C nanostructure was capable of absorbing the entire UV–Vis–NIR spectrum and acted as a catalyst for the solar-driven conversion of CO2 into CO. The strong absorption of visible light and infrared radiation generated a notable thermal effect that facilitated the reaction (Figure 13c). Ultraviolet light enhanced the local surface-plasmon resonances of iron can activate nonpolar CO2 molecules and facilitate the desorption of generated CO, resulting in improved solar-driven conversion of CO2 to CO with the Fe@C photocatalyst. Xiong and co-workers developed a range of N-doped carbon-coated Co nanoparticles (Co@NC) as photothermal catalysts by optimizing nanoparticle size, carbon layer thickness, and the type of nitrogen doping through pyrolysis of the ZIF-67 precursor (Figure 13a) [61]. The Co@NC-700 catalyst shows the exceptional activity and stability for photothermal CO2 hydrogenation to CO, achieving a selectivity of 92.6% for CO under full-spectrum Xe-lamp irradiation (Figure 13b,c), the surface temperature of the Co@NC-700 catalyst rose rapidly under the irradiation of the full spectrum, and finally stabilized at 400 °C. Owing to the coating effect of the carbon shell, the Co@NC-700 catalyst showed excellent stability over 26 consecutive cycles, outperforming Co NPs are loaded onto graphitic carbon and bare Co NPs (Figure 13e). Moreover, carbon encapsulation significantly lowers CO adsorption energy on Co9@graphene, and thus enhances CO desorption during photocatalytic CO2 hydrogenation (Figure 13f). This study presents a straightforward and effective approach for harnessing abundant and clean solar energy to efficiently facilitate CO2 conversion.

3.4. Photocatalytic Contaminant Degradation

Pollutants, which encompass dyes, antibiotics, and heavy metals in aquatic environments, as well as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other hazardous gases in the atmosphere, not only jeopardize the natural ecosystem but also threaten the health of both animals and humans; therefore, it is imperative to urgently remove these pollutant molecules from our environment. Among the many pollution control technologies, photocatalysis has emerged as a prominent area of research within the domain of pollution mitigation, due to its advantages of green, economic, and depth treatment. Up to now, MOFs have been considered as good candidates for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants due to their potential advantages, which have been mentioned above. Based on this, MOFs are widely utilized for the degradation of organic and other toxic pollutants [76,77,78,79,80].
Recently, Wang and co-workers prepared MIL-88A(Fe)/BOHP (MxBy) heterojunctions by the ball-milling method (Figure 14a) [56]. The interaction between MIL-88A(Fe) and BOHP not only significantly reduces the transfer energy barrier of photogenerated carriers, but also shortens the migration distance (Figure 14c). Consequently, the most suitable reaction system (M3B7/Vis/H2O2) exhibited outstanding performance in the photo-Fenton degradation of ENR, achieving nearly 100% catalytic efficiency and exhibiting significant mineralization capacity within a duration of 28 min under visible light (Figure 14b,d). In addition, it can be seen from the results of toxicity evaluation and economic analysis that the M3B7/Vis/H2O2 system is environmentally friendly and energy-saving.
Thiacloprid (TCL) is a representative class of neonicotinoid insecticide, which is not only relatively stable and hard to decompose but also has high solubility and toxicity, which will result in considerable environmental degradation and present serious threats to human health. Zhao and co-workers developed a Ti3C2 MXene/MIL-100(Fe) hybrid to in situ generate H2O2 for the photo-Fenton degradation of thiacloprid (Figure 15a) [81]. A heterojunction has been established between MXene and MIL-100(Fe), and combined with Fe-protoporphyrin’s biomimetic oxygen transport, it creates a synergistic system that significantly enhances H2O2 production through efficient charge carrier separation. As expected, MXene/MIL-100(Fe) efficiently removed TCL with 80% TOC in 120 min and demonstrated over 97% degradation stability across ten successive uses, outperforming many reported photo-Fenton catalysts by a factor of 21 to 60 in H2O2-free systems (Figure 15b).
Tetracycline antibiotics belong to a category of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which are biologically toxic to aquatic organisms and terrestrial animals through the food chain. Ultimately, the potential risks to human health are enormous. Therefore, it is crucial to eliminate tetracycline antibiotic residues from the environment to protect both ecological integrity and human health. Recently, Ma and co-workers employed stable HOFs to fabricate a core–shell composite (Figure 15c) [57], the NH2-UiO-66@DAT-HOF with distinct nanostructure shows outstanding stability and excellent photocatalytic efficiency for tetracycline degradation, outperforming its parent materials by 60.7 and 7.6 times (Figure 15d). The improved photocatalytic efficiency is mainly attributed to the unique structure of the DAT-HOF shell surrounding the MOFs’ core, which broadens visible light utilization and improves hole–electron pair separation through an S-scheme heterojunction (Figure 15e).
Regarding the cost and stability of catalysts, various methods such as developing eco-friendly synthesis approaches, using earth-abundant metals and low-cost linkers, incorporated with cheap support materials and designed with recyclable MOFs can reduce the cost of MOF production and enhance photocatalytic efficiency. Furthermore, various approaches like using robust metal clusters and stable linkers, functionalizing linkers, integrating with stable materials, and coating or encapsulating MOFs can enhance their stability in different conditions. This paves the way for cost-effective and robust MOF-based photocatalysts tailored for sustainable pollutant removal.

3.5. Photocatalytic Fixation of Nitrogen to Ammonia

Ammonia (NH3) is a basic industrial chemical related to the national economy and people’s livelihoods, and is widely used in fertilizer, environmental protection, military, and other fields. Furthermore, NH3 synthesis technology serves a critical function as an intermediary for an efficient hydrogen storage medium and carbon neutral carrier [82]. However, the traditional Haber–Bosch process cannot meet the growing need for cleaner, greener, and sustainable alternatives, due to its high operating conditions (high temperature: 350–550 °C and high pressure: 150–350 atm) [83,84,85]. A photocatalytic nitrogen reduction reaction (NRR) holds remarkable potential by harnessing solar light to enhance carrier separation efficiency within the catalyst, thereby facilitating the transformation of N2 molecules into NH3 or N2H4 under ambient conditions. All in all, MOFs have the potential to improve NRR efficiency by combining high N2 adsorption capacity, rapid kinetics of N2 activation, and excellent photoactivity.
An improved N2 adsorption capacity and thus enhanced photocatalytic NH3 yield is the main purpose. Oxygen vacancy could facilitate the adsorption and activation of N2 molecules. Based on this idea, Pang and co-workers adopted a low-temperature thermal calcination strategy to modulate the electronic structure of MIL-125(Ti)-250 and increase surface-active sites (Figure 16a) [86]. The abundant oxygen vacancies and high specific surface area synergistically facilitate the N2 molecules’ adsorption and activation, and MIL-125(Ti)-250 with a higher concentration of exposed active sites exhibited a twice-higher NH3 formation rate than that of the parent MIL-125(Ti), a higher Ti3+/Ti4+ atomic ratio improves the carrier separation and boosts the efficiency of photocatalytic NH3 synthesis (Figure 16b–d).
Directly introducing highly active sites to enhance the efficiency of photocatalytic NRR is desired. Single-atom catalysts (SACs) exist in the form of single-atom dispersion. By maximizing the utilization of active metal sites, SACs typically demonstrate exceptional catalytic activity. Han and co-workers engineered a dinuclear Ni2 site-modified ZnO@NC heterojunction for efficient N2 photofixation under mild conditions (Figure 16e) [62], which possessed a NH3 yield of 70.3 μg gcat−1 h−1, significantly surpassing ZnO@NC and ZnO@NC-Ni1 yields. The binuclear Ni2 active sites in ZnO@NC-Ni2 facilitate photocatalytic N2 reduction by lowering the activation energy through an associative alternating pathway (Figure 16f). Recently, Meng and co-workers created electron–metal-support interactions (EMSI) by depositing Ru single atoms onto UiO-66 through covalent bonding [87]. The photocatalytic ammonia production rate increased significantly from 4.57 to 53.28 μmol g−1 h−1 by introducing defects in UiO-66 and loading Ru single atoms, with the Ru atom enhancing N2 reduction due to its electron-rich state and strong reducing ability.

4. Summary and Outlook

The distinctive characteristics of MOF-based materials, including their diverse structures, tunable pore size, high porosity, and large surface areas, undoubtedly endow them with significant potential in catalysis and have garnered them considerable attention in recent years. In this review, we discuss various MOF composites, and recent applications in solar-driven CO2 conversion, water splitting (HER and OER), contaminant degradation, and nitrogen fixation to ammonia. Despite the unique structure and physicochemical properties of MOFs, they have shown great potential in the field of photocatalysis, several challenges including limited active sites, low solar-energy-utilization efficiency, poor cycle stability and product selectivity, hindering their widespread use in photocatalysis. Therefore, for the future advancement of MOFs in photocatalytic applications, it is essential to tackle the following challenges:
(1)
The majority of photocatalysts can effectively absorb ultraviolet (UV) or visible (Vis) light, whereas the near-infrared (NIR) spectrum, which constitutes approximately 50% of natural sunlight, has seldom been harnessed. Introducing the long-wavelength-light-responsive unit into MOFs and thus extending the region of harvesting light to visible or NIR light is appealing.
(2)
Improving two advantageous redox half reactions by concurrently utilizing electrons and holes presents considerable promise from a practical viewpoint. The efficiency of photocatalytic water decomposition of MOF materials to produce hydrogen, oxygen, and total water is still low. Although the photocatalytic water decomposition activity of some MOFs has been improved by a series of means, it is still lower than that of traditional inorganic semiconductors and significant advancements are required before practical implementation can be achieved. The follow-up work still needs to develop specific methods to enhance the photocatalytic activity of MOFs. Creating the heterojunctions’ internal electric fields at material interfaces not only promotes efficient charge carrier separation and transfer but also broadens the absorption spectrum and thus boosts photocatalytic activity. MOF-based heterojunctions constitute a versatile platform for promoting next-generation photocatalytic and optoelectronic technologies, offering solutions to energy and environmental issues.
(3)
At present, the photoreduction reaction of CO2 in the laboratory is mainly completed under the high-purity CO2 atmosphere, while the CO2 content in the actual industrial exhaust gas is only 5–15%, even the CO2 concentration in air is only 400 ppm. In this case, minimizing the high energy consumption associated with the CO2 purification process holds considerable scientific importance and directly realizes the photoreduction reaction of low-concentration CO2 in practical application research. The development of high-efficiency catalysts that can effectively convert low-concentration CO2 into desired products is a key step to realize the resource utilization of CO2 in the future.
(4)
Through the artificial photosynthesis process directly driven by natural light, coupling the photocatalytic CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation to construct a two-in-one photocatalytic system directly captures CO2 and reduces it into fuel or high value-added chemicals in situ, accompanied by the release of oxygen. This approach presents both challenges and opportunities for achieving carbon resource recycling, as it not only significantly reduces the concentration of atmospheric CO2 but also generates high value-added chemicals.
(5)
In terms of contaminant degradation, numerous studies have focused on photocatalytic oxidation to eliminate highly concentrated and resistant organic compounds (like dyes) from industrial wastewater; however, there has been limited research on the treatment of ultralow concentration organic pollutants in source water.
Although the progress on MOF photocatalysis is still in its nascent stage, the efforts of researchers in tackling the several challenges continue. In the future, we firmly believe that MOF-based materials will undoubtedly attract more attention and continue to unveil captivating surprises in catalysis.

Author Contributions

W.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Y., P.K. and Z.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.L.; supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 22372050).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ager, J.W.; Lapkin, A.A. Chemical storage of renewable energy. Science 2018, 360, 707–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Davis, S.J.; Lewis, N.S.; Shaner, M.; Aggarwal, S.; Arent, D.; Azevedo, I.L.; Benson, S.M.; Bradley, T.; Brouwer, J.; Chiang, Y.-M.; et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science 2018, 360, eaas9793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dong, K.; Shen, C.; Yan, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhuang, C.; Li, S. Integration of plasmonic effect and S-scheme heterojunction into Ag/Ag3PO4/C3N5 Photocatalyst for boosted photocatalytic levofloxacin degradation. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2023, 40, 2310013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sun, K.; Qian, Y.; Jiang, H.-L. Metal-organic frameworks for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, C.; You, C.; Rong, K.; Shen, C.; Yang, F.; Li, S. An S-scheme MIL-101(Fe)-on-BiOCl heterostructure with oxygen vacancies for boosting photocatalytic removal of Cr(VI). Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2023, 40, 2307045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, S.; Ai, Z.; Niu, X.; Yang, W.; Kang, R.; Lin, Z.; Waseem, A.; Jiao, L.; Jiang, H.-L. Linker engineering of sandwich-structured metal-oganic framework composites for optimized photocatalytic H2 production. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2302512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xiao, J.-D.; Li, R.; Jiang, H.-L. Metal-organic framework-based photocatalysis for solar fuel production. Small Methods 2023, 7, 2201258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chu, S.; Cui, Y.; Liu, N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ge, M.; Cao, C.; Huang, J.; Li, S.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, K.-Q.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Lai, Y. A review of one-dimensional TiO2 nanostructured materials for environmental and energy applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 6772–6801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hoshino, K.; Kuchii, R.; Ogawa, T. Dinitrogen photofixation properties of different titanium oxides in conducting polymer/titanium oxide hybrid systems. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 79, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hassan Raza, A.; Farhan, S.; Yu, Z.; Wu, Y. Double S-scheme ZnS/ZnO/CdS heterostructure photocatalyst for efficient hydrogen production. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2024, 40, 2406020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ding, D.; Jiang, Z.; Jin, J.; Li, J.; Ji, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zan, L. Impregnation of semiconductor CdS NPs in MOFs cavities via double solvent method for effective photocatalytic CO2 conversion. J. Catal. 2019, 375, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, F.; Hou, T.; Zhao, X.; Yao, W.; Fang, R.; Shen, K.; Li, Y. Ordered macroporous carbonous frameworks implanted with CdS quantum dots for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2102690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhong, Y.; Xia, X.; Shi, F.; Zhan, J.; Tu, J.; Fan, H.J. Transition metal carbides and nitrides in energy storage and conversion. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, X.; Dong, S.; Qi, K.; Popkov, V.; Xiang, X. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction by modified g-C3N4. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2024, 40, 2408005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xu, G.; Zhang, H.; Wei, J.; Zhang, H.-X.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, J.; Ye, J. Integrating the g-C3N4 nanosheet with B-H bonding decorated metal-organic framework for CO2 activation and photoreduction. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 5333–5340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.-C.; Yi, X.-H.; Wang, P. Powerful combination of MOFs and C3N4 for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 247, 24–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, J.; Xu, L.; Yin, Z.; Li, Z.; Dong, X.; Song, Z.; Chen, D.; Hu, R.; Wang, Q.; Han, J.; et al. “One stone four birds” design atom Co-sharing BiOBr/Bi2S3 S-scheme heterojunction photothermal synergistic enhanced full-spectrum photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024, 344, 123601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, M.; Sun, J.; Chen, G.; Wang, S.; Yao, S. Inducing photocarrier separation via 3D porous faveolate cross-linked carbon to enhance photothermal/pyroelectric property. Adv. Powder Mater. 2022, 1, 100032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, Z.; Zhao, P.; Ni, D.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, H.; Zhang, H.; Gao, H.; Yao, Z.; Bu, W. Pyroelectric nanoplatform for NIR-II-triggered photothermal therapy with simultaneous pyroelectric dynamic therapy. Mater. Horiz. 2018, 5, 946–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K.E.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jiao, L.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, H.-L.; Xu, Q. Metal-organic frameworks as platforms for catalytic applications. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1703663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kitagawa, S.; Kitaura, R.; Noro, S.-I. Functional porous coordination polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2334–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, H.-C.J.; Kitagawa, S. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5415–5418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, H.C.; Long, J.R.; Yaghi, O.M. Introduction to metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 673–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.-R.; Kuppler, R.J.; Zhou, H.-C. Selective gas adsorption and separation in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1477–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, Z.; Deibert, B.J.; Li, J. Luminescent metal-organic frameworks for chemical sensing and explosive detection. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5815–5840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kreno, L.E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O.K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R.P.; Hupp, J.T. Metal-organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1105–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Corma, A.; García, H.; Llabrés i Xamena, F.X. Engineering metal organic frameworks for heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4606–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Z.; Zi, J.; Luan, X.; Zhong, Y.; Qu, M.; Wang, Y.; Lian, Z. Localized surface plasmon resonance promotes metal-organic framework-based photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2303069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, M.; Yuan, K.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Guo, J.; Gu, L.; Hu, W.; Zhao, H.; Tang, Z. Metal-organic frameworks as selectivity regulators for hydrogenation reactions. Nature 2016, 539, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Le, S.-K.; Jin, Q.-J.; Han, J.-A.; Zhou, H.-C.; Liu, Q.-S.; Yang, F.; Miao, J.; Liu, P.-P.; Zhu, C.-Z.; Xu, H.-T. Rare earth element-modified MOF materials: Synthesis and photocatalytic applications in environmental remediation. Rare Met. 2024, 43, 1390–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, C.; Lei, D.; Xie, C.; Hang, X.; He, C.; Jiang, H.-L. Piezo-photocatalysis over metal-organic frameworks: Promoting photocatalytic activity by piezoelectric effect. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2106308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, Q.; Xu, Q.; Jiang, H.-L. Metal-organic frameworks meet metal nanoparticles: Synergistic effect for enhanced catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4774–4808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Q.; Astruc, D. State of the art and prospects in metal-organic framework (MOF)-based and MOF-derived nanocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 1438–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Suresh, K.; Matzger, A.J. Enhanced drug delivery by dissolution of amorphous drug encapsulated in a water unstable metal-organic framework (MOF). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16790–16794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lawson, H.D.; Walton, S.P.; Chan, C. Metal-organic frameworks for drug delivery: A design perspective. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 7004–7020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abánades Lázaro, I.; Wells, C.J.R.; Forgan, R.S. Multivariate modulation of the Zr MOF UiO-66 for defect-controlled combination anticancer drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5211–5217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, X.; He, S.; Li, B.; Liu, B.; Shi, Y.; Cong, W.; Gao, F.; Li, J.; Wang, F.; Liu, K.; et al. DUCNP@Mn-MOF/FOE as a highly selective and bioavailable drug delivery system for synergistic combination cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, M.; Mu, Y.-F.; Yao, S.; Guo, S.; Guo, X.-W.; Zhang, Z.-M.; Lu, T.-B. Photosensitizing single-site metal-organic framework enabling visible-light-driven CO2 reduction for syngas production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 245, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, P.; Liang, G.; Zhu, B.; Macyk, W.; Yu, J.; Xu, F. Highly selective photoconversion of CO2 to CH4 over SnO2/Cs3Bi2Br9 heterojunctions assisted by S-scheme charge separation. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 12623–12633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Tang, C.; Cheng, M.; Chen, M.; Chen, S.; Lei, L.; Chen, Y.; Yi, H.; Fu, Y.; Li, L. Polyoxometalate@metal-organic framework composites as effective photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 13374–13396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, W.; Cheng, P.; Li, Z.; Lin, Y.; Li, M.; Zi, J.; Shi, H.; Li, G.; Lian, Z.; Li, H. Tuning the cobalt-platinum alloy regulating single-atom platinum for highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2205920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. An, B.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, K.; Ji, P.; Wang, C.; Lin, W. Confinement of ultrasmall Cu/ZnOx nanoparticles in metal-organic frameworks for selective methanol synthesis from catalytic hydrogenation of CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3834–3840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, G.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Z. Metal-organic frameworks encapsulating active nanoparticles as emerging composites for catalysis: Recent progress and perspectives. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, H.; Wang, X.; Feng, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, X.; Gao, S.; Cao, R. Synthesis and characterization of Zn2GeO4/Mg-MOF-74 composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 1288–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, R.; Hu, J.; Deng, M.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, H.-L.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xie, Y.; et al. Integration of an inorganic semiconductor with a metal-organic framework: A platform for enhanced gaseous photocatalytic reactions. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4783–4788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, C.-C.; Wang, X.; Liu, W. The synthesis strategies and photocatalytic performances of TiO2/MOFs composites: A state-of-the-art review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 391, 123601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhou, T.; Du, Y.; Borgna, A.; Hong, J.; Wang, Y.; Han, J.; Zhang, W.; Xu, R. Post-synthesis modification of a metal-organic framework to construct a bifunctional photocatalyst for hydrogen production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 3229–3234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiao, J.-D.; Shang, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Luo, Y.; Yu, S.-H.; Jiang, H.-L. Boosting photocatalytic hydrogen production of a metal-organic framework decorated with platinum nanoparticles: The platinum location matters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9389–9393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, C.-X.; Xiong, Y.-Y.; Zhong, X.; Lan, P.C.; Wei, Z.-W.; Pan, H.; Su, P.-Y.; Song, Y.; Chen, Y.-F.; Nafady, A.; et al. Enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen production via the construction of robust multivariate Ti-MOF/COF composites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202114071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, L.; Meng, H.; Chai, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, W.; Guldi, D.M.; Zhu, Y. Enhancing built-in electric fields for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by encapsulating C60 fullerene into zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ma, W.; Sun, J.; Yao, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, G.; Fan, G.; Li, Y. Synergistic interplay of dual-active-sites on metallic Ni-MOFs loaded with Pt for thermal-photocatalytic conversion of atmospheric CO2 under infrared light irradiation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202313784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, S.; Byun, W.J.; Zhao, F.; Chen, D.; Mao, J.; Zhang, W.; Peng, J.; Liu, C.; Pan, Y.; Hu, J.; et al. CO2 enrichment boosts highly selective infrared-light-driven CO2 conversion to CH4 by UiO-66/Co9S8 photocatalyst. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2312616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, T.; Zhao, C.; Meng, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, C.-C. Fe-O-P bond in MIL-88A(Fe)/BOHP heterojunctions as a highway for rapid electron transfer to enhance photo-Fenton abatement of enrofloxacin. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023, 334, 122832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, J.; Mao, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zeng, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, J.; Ji, J.; Liu, D.; Gao, R.; et al. In situ assembly of hydrogen-bonded organic framework on metal-organic framework: An effective strategy for constructing core-shell hybrid photocatalyst. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2204036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, C.; Xie, C.; Gao, Y.; Tao, X.; Ding, C.; Fan, F.; Jiang, H.-L. Charge separation by creating band bending in metal-organic frameworks for improved photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202204108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cai, Z.; Dai, J.; Li, W.; Tan, K.B.; Huang, Z.; Zhan, G.; Huang, J.; Li, Q. Pd supported on MIL-68(In)-derived In2O3 nanotubes as superior catalysts to boost CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 13275–13289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cui, W.-G.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, L.; Wei, Z.-C.; Yu, L.; Dai, J.-J.; Zhang, H.; Hu, T.-L. Hybrid MOF template-directed construction of hollow-structured In2O3@ZrO2 heterostructure for enhancing hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. Small 2023, 19, 2204914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ma, J.; Yu, J.; Chen, G.; Bai, Y.; Liu, S.; Hu, Y.; Al-Mamun, M.; Wang, Y.; Gong, W.; Liu, D.; et al. Rational design of N-doped carbon-coated cobalt nanoparticles for highly efficient and durable photothermal CO2 conversion. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2302537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, W.; Liu, T.; Tan, Q.; Li, J.; Ma, Y.; He, Y.; Han, D.; Qin, D.; Niu, L. Atomically precise dinuclear Ni2 active site-modified MOF-derived ZnO@NC heterojunction toward high-performance N2 photofixation. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 3242–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gong, E.; Ali, S.; Hiragond, C.B.; Kim, H.S.; Powar, N.S.; Kim, D.; Kim, H.; In, S.-I. Solar fuels: Research and development strategies to accelerate photocatalytic CO2 conversion into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 880–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gomes Silva, C.; Luz, I.; Llabres I Xamena, F.X.; Corma, A.; García, H. Water stable Zr-benzenedicarboxylate metal-organic frameworks as photocatalysts for hydrogen generation. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11133–11138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hendrickx, K.; Vanpoucke, D.E.P.; Leus, K.; Lejaeghere, K.; Van Yperen-De Deyne, A.; Van Speybroeck, V.; Van Der Voort, P.; Hemelsoet, K. Understanding intrinsic light absorption properties of UiO-66 frameworks: A combined theoretical and experimental study. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 10701–10710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, X.-K.; Liu, J.; Zhang, L.; Dong, L.-Z.; Li, S.-L.; Kan, Y.-H.; Li, D.-S.; Lan, Y.-Q. Monometallic catalytic models hosted in stable metal-organic frameworks for tunable CO2 photoreduction. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 1726–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, H.; Wei, J.; Dong, J.; Liu, G.; Shi, L.; An, P.; Zhao, G.; Kong, J.; Wang, X.; Meng, X.; et al. Efficient visible-light-driven carbon dioxide reduction by a single-atom implanted metal-organic framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14310–14314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fang, M.; Yang, Z.; Guo, Y.; Xia, X.; Pan, S. Piezoelectric effect achieves efficient carriers’ spatial separation and enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution of UiO-66-NH2@CdS by transforming charge transfer mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 328, 125069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, X.-P.; Gagliardi, L.; Truhlar, D.G. Cerium metal-organic framework for photocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 7904–7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shi, Y.; Zhang, B. Recent advances in transition metal phosphide nanomaterials: Synthesis and applications in hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1529–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, C.; Qi, Q.; Mei, Y.; Hu, J.; Sun, M.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, B.; Zhang, L.; Yang, S. Rationally reconstructed metal-organic frameworks as robust oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2208904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Han, B.; Ou, X.; Deng, Z.; Song, Y.; Tian, C.; Deng, H.; Xu, Y.-J.; Lin, Z. Nickel metal-organic framework monolayers for photoreduction of diluted CO2: Metal-node-dependent activity and selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16811–16815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cheng, X.-M.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Dao, X.-Y.; Wang, S.-Q.; Ma, J.; Zhao, J.; Sun, W.-Y. Crystallographic facet heterojunction of MIL-125-NH2(Ti) for carbon dioxide photoreduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 298, 120524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cui, W.-G.; Zhuang, X.-Y.; Li, Y.-T.; Zhang, H.; Dai, J.-J.; Zhou, L.; Hu, Z.; Hu, T.-L. Engineering Co/MnO heterointerface inside porous graphitic carbon for boosting the low-temperature CO2 methanation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 287, 119959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, H.; Wang, T.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Dao, T.D.; Li, M.; Liu, G.; Meng, X.; Chang, K.; Shi, L.; et al. Surface-plasmon-enhanced photodriven CO2 reduction catalyzed by metal-organic-framework-derived iron nanoparticles encapsulated by ultrathin carbon layers. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3703–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Doan, H.V.; Nguyen, H.T.; Ting, V.P.; Guan, S.; Eloi, J.-C.; Hall, S.R.; Pham, X.N. Improved photodegradation of anionic dyes using a complex graphitic carbon nitride and iron-based metal-organic framework material. Faraday Discuss. 2021, 231, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shi, L.; Wang, T.; Zhang, H.; Chang, K.; Ye, J. Electrostatic self-assembly of nanosized carbon nitride nanosheet onto a zirconium metal-organic framework for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 5360–5367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, C.-C.; Li, J.-R.; Lv, X.-L.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Guo, G. Photocatalytic organic pollutants degradation in metal-organic frameworks. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2831–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bedia, J.; Muelas-Ramos, V.; Peñas-Garzón, M.; Gómez-Avilés, A.; Rodríguez, J.J.; Belver, C. A review on the synthesis and characterization of metal organic frameworks for photocatalytic water purification. Catalysts 2019, 9, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pham, X.N.; Vu, V.-T.; Nguyen, H.V.T.; Nguyen, T.T.-B.; Doan, H.V. Designing a novel heterostructure AgInS2@MIL-101(Cr) photocatalyst from PET plastic waste for tetracycline degradation. Nanoscale Adv. 2022, 4, 3600–3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hu, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Lu, M.; Muhammad, Y.; Jalil Shah, S.; He, H.; Gong, W.; Ren, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Biomimetic O2-carrying and highly in-situ H2O2 generation using Ti3C2 MXene/MIL-100(Fe) hybrid via Fe-protoporphyrin bridging for photo-fenton synergistic degradation of thiacloprid. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 137964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lin, S.; Zhang, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, L.; Liu, J. A review on catalysts for electrocatalytic and photocatalytic reduction of N2 to ammonia. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 9003–9026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Boudart, M. Ammonia synthesis: The bellwether reaction in heterogeneous catalysis. Top. Catal. 1994, 1, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nørskov, J.K.; Chen, J.G.; Miranda, R.; Fitzsimmons, T.; Stack, R.G. Sustainable Ammonia Synthesis-Exploring the Scientific Challenges Associated with Discovering Alternative, Sustainable Processes for Ammonia Production; US DOE Office of Science: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [CrossRef]
  85. Sun, B.; Lu, S.; Qian, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tian, J. Recent progress in research and design concepts for the characterization, testing, and photocatalysts for nitrogen reduction reaction. Carbon Energy 2023, 5, e305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sun, Y.; Ji, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, H.; Cao, S.; Liu, S.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Zhu, X.; et al. Synergistic effect of oxygen vacancy and high porosity of nano MIL-125(Ti) for enhanced photocatalytic nitrogen fixation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202316973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ren, G.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, C.; Meng, X. Defects-induced single-atom anchoring on metal-organic frameworks for high-efficiency photocatalytic nitrogen reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202314408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of MOFs structure, regulation strategies, and their catalytic applications.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of MOFs structure, regulation strategies, and their catalytic applications.
Molecules 29 05834 g001
Figure 2. (a) Model structure of MOF-253-Pt. (b) UV–vis spectra of MOF-253, MOF-253-Pt, and Pt(bpydc)Cl2 and the corresponding quantum efficiencies of hydrogen evolution for MOF-253-Pt at different wavelengths. The inset shows the colors of the samples. Adapted with permission from RSC [50]. (c) Structure of the UiO-66 framework. (d) Experimental linker spectra and photographs of the pure linkers. Reproduced with permission from ACS [65].
Figure 2. (a) Model structure of MOF-253-Pt. (b) UV–vis spectra of MOF-253, MOF-253-Pt, and Pt(bpydc)Cl2 and the corresponding quantum efficiencies of hydrogen evolution for MOF-253-Pt at different wavelengths. The inset shows the colors of the samples. Adapted with permission from RSC [50]. (c) Structure of the UiO-66 framework. (d) Experimental linker spectra and photographs of the pure linkers. Reproduced with permission from ACS [65].
Molecules 29 05834 g002
Figure 3. (a) Coordination environment and (b) free energy diagram of CO2RR for MOF–Ni, MOF–Co, and MOF–Cu catalysts. (c) Free energy diagram of HER. (d) Yield of CO and H2 produced by photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by MOF–Cu, MOF–Co, and MOF–Ni. * = the active species. Adapted with permission from ACS [66].
Figure 3. (a) Coordination environment and (b) free energy diagram of CO2RR for MOF–Ni, MOF–Co, and MOF–Cu catalysts. (c) Free energy diagram of HER. (d) Yield of CO and H2 produced by photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by MOF–Cu, MOF–Co, and MOF–Ni. * = the active species. Adapted with permission from ACS [66].
Molecules 29 05834 g003
Figure 4. (a) Framework structure of UiO–66. (b) The band alignment of UiO–66(Ce)–X, with the structure of the BDC–X linkers displayed in the in the box at lower right. Adapted with permission from ACS [69]. (c) Schematic diagram of photocatalytic H2 generation before and after contact with MIL–125–NH2 and metal oxides. (d) SPV spectra curves of MIL–125–NH2, MoO3/MIL–125–NH2, and V2O5/MIL–125–NH2. (e) Photocatalytic H2 generation rates for Pt–loaded MoO3/MIL–125–NH2 and V2O5/MIL–125–NH2 catalysts at different positions. (f) Schematic diagram of photocatalytic H2 production before and after combination. Adapted with permission from WILEY [58].
Figure 4. (a) Framework structure of UiO–66. (b) The band alignment of UiO–66(Ce)–X, with the structure of the BDC–X linkers displayed in the in the box at lower right. Adapted with permission from ACS [69]. (c) Schematic diagram of photocatalytic H2 generation before and after contact with MIL–125–NH2 and metal oxides. (d) SPV spectra curves of MIL–125–NH2, MoO3/MIL–125–NH2, and V2O5/MIL–125–NH2. (e) Photocatalytic H2 generation rates for Pt–loaded MoO3/MIL–125–NH2 and V2O5/MIL–125–NH2 catalysts at different positions. (f) Schematic diagram of photocatalytic H2 production before and after combination. Adapted with permission from WILEY [58].
Molecules 29 05834 g004
Figure 5. (a) A schematic representation depicts the synthesis of Pt@UiO-66-NH2 and Pt/UiO-66-NH2, highlighting the photocatalytic hydrogen production process occurring over Pt@UiO-66-NH2. (b) TA spectra of UiO-66-NH2 (excitation at 400 nm) with TA signal given in mOD (OD: optical density). (c) Time-resolved PL decay profiles and (d) TA kinetics for UiO-66-NH2, Pt@UiO-66-NH2, and Pt/UiO-66-NH2, respectively. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [51]. (e) The schematic synthesis of MTV-Ti-MOF/COF. (f) The photocatalytic H2 evolution activities. (g) The photocatalytic H2 evolution mechanism. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [52].
Figure 5. (a) A schematic representation depicts the synthesis of Pt@UiO-66-NH2 and Pt/UiO-66-NH2, highlighting the photocatalytic hydrogen production process occurring over Pt@UiO-66-NH2. (b) TA spectra of UiO-66-NH2 (excitation at 400 nm) with TA signal given in mOD (OD: optical density). (c) Time-resolved PL decay profiles and (d) TA kinetics for UiO-66-NH2, Pt@UiO-66-NH2, and Pt/UiO-66-NH2, respectively. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [51]. (e) The schematic synthesis of MTV-Ti-MOF/COF. (f) The photocatalytic H2 evolution activities. (g) The photocatalytic H2 evolution mechanism. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [52].
Molecules 29 05834 g005
Figure 6. (a) Immobilization of C60 within the pores of NU–901. (b) The internal electric field intensity for NU–901 and C60@NU–901. (c) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rates for C3N4, NU–901, and C60@NU–901. (d) The photoluminescence spectra. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [53].
Figure 6. (a) Immobilization of C60 within the pores of NU–901. (b) The internal electric field intensity for NU–901 and C60@NU–901. (c) Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rates for C3N4, NU–901, and C60@NU–901. (d) The photoluminescence spectra. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [53].
Molecules 29 05834 g006
Figure 7. (a) Pore size distribution and morphology of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH and MOF–74–Fe catalysts. (b) Schematic synthesis of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH and MOF–74–Fe catalysts and the analysis Fe–3d, OH–s,p and C–s,p. (c) Overpotential histogram of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH, MOF–74–Fe, and IrO2 catalysts before and after reaction at different current densities. (d) Electrokinetic current density under optimal kinetic fitting of OER. (e) Coverage of O*, OH*, and OOH* intermediates of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH catalyst before and after stability testing at different potentials. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [71].
Figure 7. (a) Pore size distribution and morphology of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH and MOF–74–Fe catalysts. (b) Schematic synthesis of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH and MOF–74–Fe catalysts and the analysis Fe–3d, OH–s,p and C–s,p. (c) Overpotential histogram of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH, MOF–74–Fe, and IrO2 catalysts before and after reaction at different current densities. (d) Electrokinetic current density under optimal kinetic fitting of OER. (e) Coverage of O*, OH*, and OOH* intermediates of MIL–53(Fe)–2OH catalyst before and after stability testing at different potentials. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [71].
Molecules 29 05834 g007
Figure 8. (a) The schematic illustration for the preparation of Ni MOLs. (b) CO2 photoreduction performance over Ni MOLs and Co MOLs in pure CO2 and diluted CO2 (10%). (c) The proposed mechanism delineates the conversion of CO2 to CO via Ni MOLs using [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and TEOA under visible light. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [72].
Figure 8. (a) The schematic illustration for the preparation of Ni MOLs. (b) CO2 photoreduction performance over Ni MOLs and Co MOLs in pure CO2 and diluted CO2 (10%). (c) The proposed mechanism delineates the conversion of CO2 to CO via Ni MOLs using [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and TEOA under visible light. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [72].
Molecules 29 05834 g008
Figure 9. (a) Schematic illustration of the morphology and facet over MIL–125–NH2(Ti). (b) SEM images of as–synthesized MIL–125–NH2(Ti) with different shape. Scale bar: 500 nm. (c) HOMO–LUMO gap of the as–synthesized MIL–125–NH2(Ti). (d) The yield of CO and CH4 products and (e) effective photo–electrons after irradiation for 5 h over the as–synthesized MIL–125–NH2(Ti). Adopted with permission from Elsevier [73].
Figure 9. (a) Schematic illustration of the morphology and facet over MIL–125–NH2(Ti). (b) SEM images of as–synthesized MIL–125–NH2(Ti) with different shape. Scale bar: 500 nm. (c) HOMO–LUMO gap of the as–synthesized MIL–125–NH2(Ti). (d) The yield of CO and CH4 products and (e) effective photo–electrons after irradiation for 5 h over the as–synthesized MIL–125–NH2(Ti). Adopted with permission from Elsevier [73].
Molecules 29 05834 g009
Figure 10. (a) Three-dimensional frame structure diagram of Ni–MOF and the corresponding trinuclear [Ni3(COO)6] node. (b) CO2, N2, and O2 adsorption curves of Pt/Ni–MOF at 25 °C, insert: CO2 absorption at a pressure of 0.4 mbar (the pressure pertinent to direct air capture). (c) Thermal-photocatalytic yields of CO and CH4 on the pristine Pt/Ni–MOF in H2: CO2 (with a 1:7 ratio) and on Pt/Ni–MOF with captured ambient CO2 in H2: Ar (with a 1:7 ratio), respectively. (d) AQYs of Pt/Ni–MOF for CO2 reduction under different wavelengths. (e) Schematic diagram of the proposed pathway for Pt/Ni–MOF photocatalytic conversion of CO2. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [54].
Figure 10. (a) Three-dimensional frame structure diagram of Ni–MOF and the corresponding trinuclear [Ni3(COO)6] node. (b) CO2, N2, and O2 adsorption curves of Pt/Ni–MOF at 25 °C, insert: CO2 absorption at a pressure of 0.4 mbar (the pressure pertinent to direct air capture). (c) Thermal-photocatalytic yields of CO and CH4 on the pristine Pt/Ni–MOF in H2: CO2 (with a 1:7 ratio) and on Pt/Ni–MOF with captured ambient CO2 in H2: Ar (with a 1:7 ratio), respectively. (d) AQYs of Pt/Ni–MOF for CO2 reduction under different wavelengths. (e) Schematic diagram of the proposed pathway for Pt/Ni–MOF photocatalytic conversion of CO2. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [54].
Molecules 29 05834 g010
Figure 11. (a) A schematic illustration demonstrates the effective reduction of CO2 to CH4 using an IR–light–driven UiO–66/Co9S8 composite catalyst, leveraging the advantages of both porous UiO–66 and metallic Co9S8. (b) CH4 evolution rates of CO2 photoreduction over different catalysts. (c) Stability assessments of UiO–66/Co9S8 for photocatalytic activity under full–spectrum light irradiation. (d) A possible reaction pathway for photocatalytic CO2 methanation, * = active site. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [55].
Figure 11. (a) A schematic illustration demonstrates the effective reduction of CO2 to CH4 using an IR–light–driven UiO–66/Co9S8 composite catalyst, leveraging the advantages of both porous UiO–66 and metallic Co9S8. (b) CH4 evolution rates of CO2 photoreduction over different catalysts. (c) Stability assessments of UiO–66/Co9S8 for photocatalytic activity under full–spectrum light irradiation. (d) A possible reaction pathway for photocatalytic CO2 methanation, * = active site. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [55].
Molecules 29 05834 g011
Figure 12. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the synthesis process for In2O3@Pd and h-In2O3/Pd catalysts (above) as well as c-In2O3/Pd and r-In2O3/Pd catalysts (below). (b) The conversion of CO2 and the distribution of products across four different Pd/In2O3 catalysts. (c) Time on stream (TOS) for the four catalysts in CO2 hydrogenation under standard conditions. (d) Schematic illustration of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Reproduced with permission from ACS [59]. (e) Schematic illustration of the synthetic process of hollow-structured In2O3@ZrO2 heterostructure. (f) Simplified model showing the main reaction mechanism on In2O3@ZrO2 catalyst. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [60].
Figure 12. (a) Diagrammatic representation of the synthesis process for In2O3@Pd and h-In2O3/Pd catalysts (above) as well as c-In2O3/Pd and r-In2O3/Pd catalysts (below). (b) The conversion of CO2 and the distribution of products across four different Pd/In2O3 catalysts. (c) Time on stream (TOS) for the four catalysts in CO2 hydrogenation under standard conditions. (d) Schematic illustration of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Reproduced with permission from ACS [59]. (e) Schematic illustration of the synthetic process of hollow-structured In2O3@ZrO2 heterostructure. (f) Simplified model showing the main reaction mechanism on In2O3@ZrO2 catalyst. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [60].
Molecules 29 05834 g012
Figure 13. (a) Schematic diagram of the preparation of the nitrogen-doped carbon layer-coated cobalt nanoparticles catalyst (Co@NC). (b) Nitrogen species and content distribution of catalytic pyrolysis at different temperatures. (c) UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectra for the synthesized Co@NC catalysts. (d) Monitoring of photothermal temperatures for Co@NC-700, Co/C, and uncoated Co nanoparticles under a light intensity of 3.0 W cm−2. (e) Photothermal CO2 hydrogenation stability evaluation for the Co@NC-700 with Xe irradiation at 3.0 W cm−2. (f) Optimized configuration for CO adsorption on Co9@graphene, graphene, and the Co (111) surface. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [61].
Figure 13. (a) Schematic diagram of the preparation of the nitrogen-doped carbon layer-coated cobalt nanoparticles catalyst (Co@NC). (b) Nitrogen species and content distribution of catalytic pyrolysis at different temperatures. (c) UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectra for the synthesized Co@NC catalysts. (d) Monitoring of photothermal temperatures for Co@NC-700, Co/C, and uncoated Co nanoparticles under a light intensity of 3.0 W cm−2. (e) Photothermal CO2 hydrogenation stability evaluation for the Co@NC-700 with Xe irradiation at 3.0 W cm−2. (f) Optimized configuration for CO adsorption on Co9@graphene, graphene, and the Co (111) surface. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [61].
Molecules 29 05834 g013
Figure 14. (a) Schematic presentation of the preparation route of MxBy heterojunctions. (b) Temporal analysis of photo–Fenton degradation of ENR across various reaction systems. (c) Time–resolved PL decay spectra. (d) Possible ENR catalytic degradation mechanism. Adopted with permission from Elsevier [56].
Figure 14. (a) Schematic presentation of the preparation route of MxBy heterojunctions. (b) Temporal analysis of photo–Fenton degradation of ENR across various reaction systems. (c) Time–resolved PL decay spectra. (d) Possible ENR catalytic degradation mechanism. Adopted with permission from Elsevier [56].
Molecules 29 05834 g014
Figure 15. (a) Schematic diagram of TCL degradation by MXFAA/MIL(Fe)-POR photo–Fenton. (b) Photo–Fenton TCL degradation performance. Adopted with permission from Elsevier [81]. (c) Schematic diagram of the synthesis route of NH2–UiO–66@DAT–HOF photocatalysts. (d) Efficiency of TC photodegradation in the presence of the U@H2 hybrid. (e) Energy band structure of the U@H2 heterojunction. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [57].
Figure 15. (a) Schematic diagram of TCL degradation by MXFAA/MIL(Fe)-POR photo–Fenton. (b) Photo–Fenton TCL degradation performance. Adopted with permission from Elsevier [81]. (c) Schematic diagram of the synthesis route of NH2–UiO–66@DAT–HOF photocatalysts. (d) Efficiency of TC photodegradation in the presence of the U@H2 hybrid. (e) Energy band structure of the U@H2 heterojunction. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [57].
Molecules 29 05834 g015
Figure 16. (a) The synthesis of MIL–125(Ti) involves a solvothermal method followed by thermal calcination. T1 and T2 denote the different calcination temperature. MIL–125(Ti)–250 with oxygen vacancies and an increase in BET surface area. (b) The adsorption of an N2 molecule on both free and defect modes, along with the associated binding energy. (c) Density of states of free and defect structure. (d) The associative pathway encompasses both “end–on” (vertical) and “side–on” (parallel) configurations for N2 adsorption. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [86]. (e) Schematic illustration for the construction of ZnO@NC-Ni2 with dinuclear Ni2 sites based on ZIF–8. (f) Schematic diagram of possible pathways for N2 reduction to NH3. Adapted with permission from ACS [62].
Figure 16. (a) The synthesis of MIL–125(Ti) involves a solvothermal method followed by thermal calcination. T1 and T2 denote the different calcination temperature. MIL–125(Ti)–250 with oxygen vacancies and an increase in BET surface area. (b) The adsorption of an N2 molecule on both free and defect modes, along with the associated binding energy. (c) Density of states of free and defect structure. (d) The associative pathway encompasses both “end–on” (vertical) and “side–on” (parallel) configurations for N2 adsorption. Reproduced with permission from WILEY [86]. (e) Schematic illustration for the construction of ZnO@NC-Ni2 with dinuclear Ni2 sites based on ZIF–8. (f) Schematic diagram of possible pathways for N2 reduction to NH3. Adapted with permission from ACS [62].
Molecules 29 05834 g016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, W.; Yu, L.; Kang, P.; Chu, Z.; Li, Y. Modifications and Applications of Metal-Organic-Framework-Based Materials for Photocatalysis. Molecules 2024, 29, 5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245834

AMA Style

Ma W, Yu L, Kang P, Chu Z, Li Y. Modifications and Applications of Metal-Organic-Framework-Based Materials for Photocatalysis. Molecules. 2024; 29(24):5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Weimin, Liang Yu, Pei Kang, Zhiyun Chu, and Yingxuan Li. 2024. "Modifications and Applications of Metal-Organic-Framework-Based Materials for Photocatalysis" Molecules 29, no. 24: 5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245834

APA Style

Ma, W., Yu, L., Kang, P., Chu, Z., & Li, Y. (2024). Modifications and Applications of Metal-Organic-Framework-Based Materials for Photocatalysis. Molecules, 29(24), 5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245834

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop