Next Article in Journal
Prenylation of Flavanones by an Aromatic Prenyltransferase from Fusarium globosum
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Study of Spodumene by Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (tof-SIMS)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Blue Exciplexes in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes: Opportunities and Challenges

by
Duxu Yan
1,†,
Mengmeng Zhang
1,†,
Jintao Wang
2,*,
Xiaoqing Jing
1,
Jun Sun
1,
Yongan Zhang
1,
Liping Yang
2,
Ren Sheng
1,* and
Ping Chen
1,*
1
Institute of Physics and Electronic Information, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
2
School of Information Engineering, Yantai Institute of Technology, Yantai 264005, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2025, 30(7), 1556; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071556
Submission received: 4 March 2025 / Revised: 24 March 2025 / Accepted: 28 March 2025 / Published: 31 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Opportunities and Challenges in Organic Optoelectronic Materials)

Abstract

:
Blue exciplexes, a critical innovative component in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) technology, exhibit substantial potential for enhancing device efficiency, reducing driving voltage, and simplifying structural designs. This article reviews the pivotal role of blue exciplexes in OLEDs, analyzing their unique advantages and challenges as emitters and host materials. Through optimized molecular design, blue exciplexes achieve high color purity and emission efficiency, surpassing conventional fluorescent materials. Additionally, their wide energy bands and high triplet energy provide opportunities to improve the performance of sky-blue, deep-blue, and white OLEDs. However, limitations in deep-blue efficiency, material degradation due to high-energy excitons, and spectral red-shift pose significant challenges to their development. This review offers a comprehensive perspective and research reference on the photophysical mechanisms of blue exciplexes and their applications in display and lighting fields.

1. Introduction

Over the past 30 years, significant progress has been made in the research of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Since 1987, after Eastman Kodak and Tang’s team fabricated the first highly efficient, low-voltage OLED device, the research and development of OLED technology have advanced rapidly [3,4]. To overcome the limitation of traditional fluorescent excitons, which exhibit a utilization efficiency of merely 25%, S. R. Forrest and coworkers introduced phosphorescent emitting materials, achieving an internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of up to 100%. However, the frequent use of precious metals has constrained their further development [8,9]. In 2012, Adachi and colleagues first reported thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials, which have since been recognized by both academia and industry as next-generation emitters. These materials feature a small singlet-triplet energy gap (ΔEST), enabling triplet excitons to undergo reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) to singlet excitons at room temperature, thereby generating delayed fluorescence [10,11]. In the same year, they reported an exciplex system and, by introducing the concept of TADF, elucidated the formation mechanism and energy transfer processes of the exciplex system, laying the foundation for subsequent extensive research [12]. This finding highlights the substantial potential of exciplex-based systems in high-performance optoelectronic devices.
Among them, blue exciplexes have garnered significant attention due to their potential applications in high-color-purity displays and energy-efficient lighting technologies. However, their development and practical implementation face exceptional complexities compared to exciplexes emitting at longer wavelengths, primarily due to the demanding requirement of high excited-state energy (typically ≥2.8 eV) for blue emission [13,14,15,16]. The core challenges and unique characteristics of blue exciplex systems are outlined as follows: (i) exciplex emission tends to red-shift and broaden, making it challenging to sustain blue emission (420–490 nm) or achieve ideal Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage (CIE) coordinates (The National Television System Committee (NTSC) standard specifies that the CIE y-coordinate of deep-blue light should be ≤0.08) [17]; (ii) High triplet energy risks back-energy transfer or poor exciton confinement, reducing efficiency and stability [18,19]; and (iii) high-energy excitons degrade materials, shortening lifetimes [20].
Notwithstanding these challenges, blue exciplexes hold immense promise for realizing OLED devices with superior color purity and low driving voltage [13,21,22,23,24]. This review aims to systematically summarize the research progress and challenges in blue exciplex-based OLEDs, explore their future development pathways, and provide references and inspiration for researchers in this field. To enhance readability, the article is structured into three key sections: (1) fundamental theories of blue exciplex formation and emission mechanisms, (2) advances in blue exciplex systems as emitters and their applications in white organic light-emitting diodes (WOLEDs); and (3) advances in blue exciplexes as host materials and their applications in WOLEDs. Finally, the future prospects for the development of blue exciplex systems in OLEDs are discussed.

2. Photophysical Mechanisms of Blue Exciplexes

Similar to the formation mechanisms of exciplexes emitting other colors, the generation of blue exciplexes also involves an intermolecular charge transfer (CT) process, which occurs exclusively under excited-state conditions [25,26,27,28]. When one molecule (e.g., acceptor A or donor D) absorbs energy and transitions to an excited state, exciplexes (denoted as (Aδ−Dδ⁺)*) emerge through intermolecular collisions and orbital interactions. Subsequently, these exciplexes undergo radiative decay to return to the ground state, accompanied by photon emission.
Similarly, blue exciplexes are also accompanied by typical exciplex spectral characteristics such as red-shift and broadening [29,30,31,32,33]. This presents the initial challenge for blue exciplexes: selecting shorter-wavelength donors and acceptors to ensure pure or deep-blue emission despite spectral red-shift and broadening. The formation of exciplexes requires a thermodynamic driving force (−ΔGcs), making the selection of appropriate donor and acceptor materials critical. This driving force is typically quantified using a modified Rehm-Weller equation:
Δ G c s = E e x c i t o n ( E D *   o r   E A * ) E e x c i p l e x
Here, Eexciton represents the exciton energy of constituent molecules (i.e., the excited-state energy of either the donor or acceptor), while Eexciplex denotes the exciplex energy. The exciton energy is assumed to be the energy difference between the HOMO of the donor and the LUMO of the acceptor, which can be estimated via electrochemical methods. Generally, the ideal condition for exciplex formation requires a driving force greater than 0.57 eV [34].
Furthermore, the triplet energy of an exciplex generally needs to be lower than that of its constituent molecules; otherwise, it may transfer to the molecular triplets via triplet-triplet energy transfer (TTET), thereby disrupting the reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) process [35,36]. The reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) process is fundamentally governed by its rate KRISC, which is critically dependent on the ΔEST. The temperature-dependent RISC rate can be mathematically expressed as:
K R I S C = A e Δ E S T K B T
where A represents the pre-exponential factor, KB is the Boltzmann constant, and T denotes the absolute temperature. This formulation reveals that KRISC exhibits an exponential relationship with both ΔEST and T. In practice, with ambient temperature (T) often limited, minimizing ΔEST through molecular design is crucial for boosting RISC efficiency. A smaller ΔEST offers two key benefits: (i) faster RISC dynamics reduces the thermal activation barrier, enhancing the up-conversion of triplet excitons to singlets; (ii) higher RISC efficiency amplifies TADF, increasing the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) [10,11,20,37,38].
Moreover, in wide color gamut standards (e.g., DCI-P3 or Rec. 2020), the purity and intensity of blue light directly influence the vividness and authenticity of the displayed image. As an emitter, the blue exciplex composite, with its inherently high exciton utilization efficiency, holds the potential to replace traditional fluorescent materials. The emission mechanism is illustrated in Figure 1a. Furthermore, the shorter wavelength of blue exciplex composites corresponds to significantly higher photon energy compared to green (~2.3 eV) and red (~2.0 eV). Consequently, when used as a host, the blue exciplex composite is well-suited to accommodate dopants of nearly all colors. Moreover, the presence of RISC enables more efficient exciton utilization and energy transfer, with the underlying mechanism depicted in Figure 1b.
Simultaneously, the advancement of blue exciplex systems is inseparable from the development of donor and acceptor materials. Figure 2 presents the chemical structures of all donors and acceptors of the exciplexes mentioned in this review, along with their corresponding HOMO and LUMO energy levels.

3. Blue Exciplex as the Emitter in OLEDs

Blue exciplexes, when used as emitters, enable the fabrication of highly efficient blue OLED devices. Moreover, utilizing their blue emission properties, these exciplexes can be combined with yellow, green, or red phosphorescent or fluorescent dyes, facilitating the development of high-performance white OLED devices. This dual application demonstrates the versatility of blue exciplexes, offering the possibility for creating efficient blue emitting devices while also opening new pathways for the advancement of next-generation white OLEDs.

3.1. Exciplex as an Emitter in Blue OLEDs

Using exciplexes as emitters and efficiently harvesting triplet excitons significantly enhance the external quantum efficiency (EQE) of OLEDs. In 2013, Jankus et al. proposed a deep-blue exciplex with NPB (N,N’-Bis(naphthalen-1-yl)-N,N’-bis(phenyl)-benzidine) as the donor and TPBi (1,3,5-Tris(1-phenyl-1Hbenzimidazol-2-yl)benzene) as the acceptor. As an emitter, the exciplex achieved an external quantum efficiency of 3.7%, and electroluminescence at 450 nm. It is noteworthy that with the triplet energy level of NPB being lower than that of the exciplex, no TADF phenomenon existed in this exciplex. Jankus et al. explained the delayed fluorescence observed in Time-Resolved Photoluminescence (TRPL) through triplet-triplet fusion (TTF). As shown in Figure 3, they pointed out that it is precisely due to TTF that the exciplex exhibited additional EQE, demonstrating the potential of TTF in fabricating high-performance deep-blue OLEDs [35]. In the same year, Kim et al. reported a blue exciplex formed by TCTA (4,4’,4-Tris(carbazol-9-yl)triphenylamine) and B3PYMPM (4,6-Bis(3,5-di(pyridin-3-yl)phenyl)-2-methylpyrimidine). They observed that this exciplex exhibited pronounced delayed fluorescence, with the delayed emission increasing as the temperature decreased. At an extremely low temperature of 35 K, the exciplex achieved a photoluminescence (PL) efficiency of up to 100% and demonstrated efficient RISC rates ranging from 3 × 10−6 to 3 × 10−4 s−1. These findings suggest that the material possesses a minimal energy gap, enabling the RISC process from the triplet state to the singlet state without requiring thermal activation [39].
In 2014, Hung et al. reported a highly efficient blue exciplex emission phenomenon. The authors designed and synthesized a novel electron transport material called 2,4,6-Tris [3-(diphenylphosphinyl)phenyl]-1,3,5-triazine (PO-T2T), with HOMO and LUMO energy levels of −2.83 eV and −6.83 eV, respectively. The authors created a blue light-emitting device using an exciplex formed by (1,3-Bis(carbazol-9-yl)benzene) mCP: PO-T2T as the emitting layer. The device achieved an impressively low turn-on voltage of only 2 V and an EQEmax of 8% (Figure 4). The authors studied the emission mechanism and concluded that balancing electrons and holes in the device was crucial. They also highlighted the importance of ensuring sufficient contact between donor and acceptor molecules in the exciplex-doped layer to improve device efficiency [40]. In 2015, Liu et al. developed the NPB:DPTPCz exciplex emitter by blending the hole-transporting material N,N′-bis(1-naphthalenyl)-N,N′-bisphenyl-(1,1′-biphenyl)-4,4′-diamine (NPB) with the high-triplet-energy (T1) bipolar molecule 3-(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-9-phenyl-9H-carbazole (DPTPCz) in a 1:1 weight ratio. The normalized EL spectrum of the exciplex revealed an emission peak at 491 nm, and the resulting device achieved an EQEmax of 0.6%. This finding indicates that the NPB:DPTPCz exciplex exhibited some emissive capability in the blue spectral region. However, its low EQE suggests that both exciton utilization efficiency and device performance require further optimization [28].
In 2015, T. Zhang et al. reported the development of a highly efficient blue exciplex system exhibiting TADF characteristics, employing mCBP (3,3-di(carbazolyl)biphenyl) as the donor material and PO-T2T as the acceptor material. The exciplex emission peaked at 473 nm, and a 50 mol% mCBP:PO-T2T doped film demonstrated a photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of 34 ± 4%. The optimized blue OLED achieved CIE coordinates of (0.17, 0.23), with a maximum EQE of 7.66%, a maximum CE of 15.08 cd/A, and a maximum power efficiency (PE) of 17.78 lm/W [41]. In the same year, Lee et al. developed a thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) blue exciplex emitter by blending the hole-transporting molecule 4,4’-bis(9-carbazolyl)-2,2’-dimethylbiphenyl (CDBP) with the electron-transporting molecule ((1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triyl)tris(benzene-3,1-diyl))tris(diphenylphosphine oxide) (PO-T2T) in a 1:1 weight ratio. The resulting CDBP:PO-T2T blend exhibited a photoluminescence (PL) peak at 476 nm. Devices fabricated with this blue exciplex emitter achieved an impressive EQEmax of 13% and a PEmax of 27.8 lm/W, highlighting its potential for efficient blue OLED applications [34]. In 2019, Marian Chapran et al. explored non-doped exciplex blends utilizing PO-T2T as the electron acceptor, paired with CzSi, mCP, and mCPPO1, to investigate their emission properties and potential in OLED applications [42]. In device applications, the blue-emitting OLEDs based on CzSi:PO-T2T, mCP:PO-T2T, and mCPPO1:PO-T2T achieved maximum EQEs of 6.1%, 16%, and 6.5%, respectively, with mCP:PO-T2T exhibiting superior performance due to its minimal ΔEST and high TADF efficiency. The study suggests these exciplexes hold potential for multicolor OLEDs, achieving efficient emission without additional host materials, though color purity requires further optimization for display applications.
Although exciplex-based devices formed by mixing suitable donor and acceptor materials can achieve high EQE, further discussion is needed on strategies to enhance their performance. Exploring the molecular design of exciplex donor and acceptor materials is currently the key to improving the EQE of these devices. In 2015, Lee et al. developed a high-efficiency blue exciplex device by designing the acceptor material of 3′-(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-(1,1′-biphenyl)3-yl)-9-carbazole (CzTrz) with a suitable donor segment (Figure 5). The blue exciplex device, with TCTA as the donor and CzTrz as the acceptor, achieved a record-breaking EQE of 12.6%, which was the highest EQE reported for blue exciplex emitters at that time [43].
In 2017, Hung et al. first designed a carbazole-based electron donor molecule, 9,9-bis[4-(9-carbazolyl)phenyl]fluorene (CPF), which was combined with PO-T2T as the acceptor to form an exciplex. In Figure 6, the device achieved an EQE of 9.5%, a CE of 35.3 cd/A, and a PE of 41.3 lm/W. To further enhance device performance, the authors designed a tert-butyl group-substituted donor molecule, 9,9-bis[4-(carbazol-9-yl)phenyl]-2,7-di-tert-butylfluorene (CPTBF), to replace CPF as the exciplex donor. By introducing the remote steric effect, the effective contact area between donor and acceptor molecules was increased. As a result, the EQEmax of the blue exciplex device was improved to 12.5%. This proposed concept of the remote steric effect provides a novel and effective strategy for designing high performance exciplex-based OLED devices [44].
In 2015, Z. Chen et al. reported an OLED based on a highly efficient blue exciplex exhibiting TADF phenomenon. The research team designed and synthesized a novel donor material, TPAPB ((4-dimethylboryl)phenyltriphenylamine), with a LUMO level of 2.35 eV and a HOMO level of 5.36 eV (Figure 7). Using TPAPB as the donor and TPBi as the acceptor, the device achieved a maximum PEmax of 7.2 ± 0.5 lm W−1 and an EQEmax of 7.0 ± 0.4%. The authors attributed this excellent EQE to the high PLQY of the TPAPB:TPBi doped film and the enhanced efficiency resulting from the exciplex formation, which broadened the exciton recombination zone and improved the balance of hole and electron transport [45].
In 2018, Adachi et al. proposed enhancing exciplex PLQY by studying excited-state dynamics. They designed and synthesized a spiro-type four-coordinate boron derivative, BFPD, as the exciplex acceptor and paired it with Di-[4-(N,N-di-p-tolyl-amino)-pheny l]cyc lohexane (TAPC) as the donor. As can be seen in Figure 8, when the donor-to-acceptor ratio of the exciplex was 1:1, the device exhibited optimal efficiency, achieving an EQE of 10.5%. This enhancement was attributed to the excellent energy level alignment of the BFPD: TAPC exciplex, which led to a substantial increase in delayed fluorescence under electrical excitation, indicating efficient triplet harvesting [46]. In the same year, Lin et al. synthesized a bipolar transport material with excellent thermal and morphological stability called CN-Cz2, which facilitated efficient energy transfer and improves OLED performance. The authors used PO-T2T as the exciplex acceptor, and the resulting CN-Cz2: PO-T2T thin film exhibited a PLQY of 55% in air. The resulting blue exciplex OLED achieved an excellent CE of 37.8 cd/A and PE of 47.5 lm/W [47]. In 2019, Tao et al. designed and synthesized two N-linked benzoimidazole/oxadiazole hybrid electron acceptors, 2-(2,4-bis(2-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol1-yl)phenyl)-5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole (24iPBIOXD) and 2-phenyl-5-(2,4,6-tris(2-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-1yl)phenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole (iTPBIOXD), via a simple catalyst-free C-N coupling reaction. When paired with the electron donor mCP, the resulting deep-blue exciplex achieved EQEs of only 0.65% and 0.63%. The study found that the electroluminescent (EL) performance of blue exciplexes was closely tied to the HOMO-LUMO energy offset, with the poor emission performance of this deep-blue exciplex attributed to an insufficient energy offset [48].
With the advancement of OLED technology, the design and synthesis of deep-blue emitting materials face numerous challenges, particularly due to the significant red-shifted and spectral broadening that often occur in exciplex emission compared to single compounds. In 2021, Li et al. proposed a novel exciplex system to achieve more desirable deep-blue emission characteristics. In this work, the authors designed a new material, 2,5,8-tris(di(4-fluorophenyl)amine)-1,3,4,6,7,9,9b-heptaazaphenalene (HAP-3FDPA) as an electron donor by incorporating three bis(4-fluorophenyl)amine moieties onto a heptazine backbone, and using mCP as the electron donor. The 8 wt% HAP-3FDPA: mCP exciplex system displayed a deep-blue emission with a peak wavelength of 433 nm and a high PLQY of 53.2%. As shown in Figure 9, an OLED containing this exciplex system as an emitting layer showed deep-blue emission with the peak EQE of 10.2%, and showed deep-blue CIE coordinates of (0.16, 0.12). The article highlighted that the small ∆EST facilitated efficient exciton up-conversion and minimized overlap between the HOMO and LUMO [49]. In 2023, Xie et al. developed an efficient deep-blue emitter TB-3tBuCz, and significant TADF behavior emerged when it was doped with the host material 2,6-Bis(3-(9H-carbazol-9-yl)phenyl)pyridine (26DCzPPy), leading to the formation of exciplex species. This process facilitated efficient spin-flip of triplet excitons, resulting in an EQEmax of 14.6% and deep-blue emission with CIE (0.158, 0.052) [50]. In the same year, Fu et al. developed the (3,30-di(9H-carbazol-9-yl) biphenyl) mCBP: DNPhB (difluoroboron(Z)-3-(diphenylamino)-3-hydroxyN,N-diphenylacrylamide) exciplex, which exhibited deep-blue emission at 444 nm. A deep-blue OLED fabricated with this exciplex emitter achieves an EQEmax of 4.83%, CIE coordinates of (0.152, 0.075). This high-performance wide-bandgap exciplex highlights its potential in deep-blue OLEDs, offering new opportunities for enhancing color purity and efficiency [22]. Furthermore, the NPB:TAZ exciplex proposed by K. N. Narayanan Unni et al. achieved deep-blue emission at 440 nm with a turn-on voltage of 3.6 V [51]. In 2025, Liu et al. designed a deep-blue fluorescent emitter, BOBTFB, which, when used as an acceptor paired with TCTA, achieved blue emission at 469 nm with CIE coordinates of (0.15, 0.18) [52].
Compared to bulk exciplexes, interface exciplexes can utilize doping-free technology, significantly simplifying the device structure. Due to the large energy level offset between the HOMO of the donor and the LUMO of the acceptor, charge carriers predominantly recombine at the heterojunction interface to form excitons for light emission. To ensure efficient emission from the interface exciplex, the triplet energy level (T1) of the exciplex should be lower than those of the donor or acceptor, preventing reverse energy transfer from the exciplex to the constituent molecules. To develop high-T1-energy-level materials for forming interface exciplexes, researchers have extensively explored molecular structures in recent years. In 2020, Tan et al. developed a material named P6, which had a T1 energy of 3.0 eV. P6 was shown to form an efficient interface exciplex with TCTA, enabling high-performance blue emission. In the TCTA: P6-based OLED, TCTA acted as the donor for exciplex formation, while P6 served as the acceptor (Figure 10). The exciplex-based OLED achieved an EQEmax of 9.1% and an impressive deep-blue emission at 433 nm, highlighting the potential of tuning interface exciplexes to enhance device performance. Furthermore, the authors predicted that similar device architectures could lead to further advancements in both blue OLEDs and WOLEDs, offering significant improvements in efficiency and emission characteristics [53].
In addition to developing suitable acceptor and donor materials to form exciplexes, researchers have proposed a strategy of employing materials with TADF characteristics as either the donor or acceptor in exciplex systems. The advantage lies in the fact that TADF-type donor or acceptor materials possess an intramolecular RISC process. Upon forming an exciplex, an additional intermolecular RISC process emerges. This dual RISC mechanism facilitates the up-conversion of triplet excitons into singlet excitons, thereby significantly enhancing the utilization efficiency of singlet excitons. In 2016, Li et al. investigated exciplex emitters formed by the bipolar material DMAC-DPS, a D-A-D-type molecule comprising a diphenylsulfone (DPS) acceptor and 9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine (DMAC) donor, paired with the acceptors T2T and B4PyMPm. Devices utilizing DMAC-DPS:T2T and DMAC-DPS:B4PyMPm blends as the emitting layer exhibited exciplex emission peaks at 480 nm and 493 nm, respectively. The blue and sky-blue devices achieved external quantum efficiencies (EQE) of 4.44% and 4.40%, respectively, demonstrating that the combination of DMAC-DPS as a donor with different acceptors could effectively tune the emission wavelength of exciplex systems, offering a reference for the development of blue OLEDs, though their performance still has room for improvement [54]. In 2020, T. B. Nguyen et al. explored the luminescent properties of a blue exciplex system comprising TrisPCz as the donor and BCz-TRZ as the acceptor [55]. Notably, BCz-TRZ is an acceptor material endowed with TADF properties. Their findings revealed that the TrisPCz:BCz-TRZ-doped film emitted at 499 nm with a photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) of 50%. The optimized blue OLED exhibited a turn-on voltage (Von) of 3.2 V, a peak EQE of 11.9%, a maximum CE of 33.6 cd/A, and a maximum PE of 33.0 lm/W. In 2020, S. K. Jeon et al. investigated the luminescent properties of an exciplex system using DMAC-DPS (10,10′-(4,4′-sulfonyldi(4,1-phenylene))bis(9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine)), a material with TADF characteristics, as the donor, and PO-T2T as the acceptor. The authors proposed a novel approach to enhance the EQEmax of OLEDs by dispersing the exciplex within a TADF matrix. The DMAC-DPS:PO-T2T-doped film exhibited an emission wavelength of 480 nm. The emissive layer comprised a blend of the TADF material DMAC-DPS and the n-type material PO-T2T, forming an exciplex. By limiting the n-type material content to 1 wt%, the resulting device exhibited outstanding performance, achieving an EQEmax of 15.3%, a substantial improvement over conventional exciplex OLEDs with 50% n-type material content (EQE of 10.8%) [56]. Due to the limited energy gap between the HOMO and the LUMO, exciplexes in the deep-blue region exhibit lower EQE and poorer color purity, resulting in limited success for blue OLEDs based on exciplex emission [22]. Particularly in deep-blue emission, the demand for higher energy transitions poses greater challenges to the design of exciplex systems, often requiring further optimization of molecular structures to enhance the blueshift of the spectrum while maintaining an efficient RISC process. Additionally, the hot exciton mechanism serves as an effective strategy for achieving high-performance blue fluorescence. This process involves a transition between high-lying triplet states and singlet states, enabling efficient utilization of triplet excitons through RISC from T2 to S1. Table 1 presents a selection of hot exciton-based blue-emitting materials, compared alongside blue exciplex systems.

3.2. Exciplex as an Emitter in WOLEDs

White organic light-emitting diodes (WOLEDs), which have shown immense potential for applications in solid-state lighting and flat-panel displays, have attracted significant attention in recent years, becoming a major focus of research. With advantages such as high luminous efficiency, wide color gamut, and low energy consumption, WOLEDs are demonstrating remarkable development potential in both commercial applications and academic research. In 2015, Duan et al. designed a highly efficient blue exciplex, TCTA: Bphen (4,7-Diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline), which was combined with the yellow phosphorescent material of PO-01 to fabricate an F/P hybrid WOLED. By introducing a 3 nm-thick Bphen blocking layer, the excited states in the TCTA: Bphen/Bphen system were effectively confined at the interface, enabling efficient utilization of triplet excitons by the yellow emitting material through energy transfer, thereby enhancing exciton utilization efficiency. The resulting WOLED achieved a PEmax of 9.03 lm/W, an EQEmax of 4.3%, and a low turn-on voltage of approximately 3.0 eV, along with white light emission coordinates of (0.30, 0.35) [62]. In hybrid white OLEDs, single-emission-layer (S-EML) mixed WOLEDs have not yet been thoroughly explored. Additionally, finding suitable high T1 blue fluorescent materials for energy transfer remains a significant challenge. To address this, Lee et al. designed a blue exciplex based on (4,4′-Bis(carbazol-9-yl)-2,2′-dimethylbiphenyl) CDBP: PO-T2T as the blue fluorescent material, successfully fabricating an S-EML hybrid WOLED with low turn-on voltage and high efficiency. Without using light out-coupling techniques, the fabricated device achieved a remarkably low Von of 2.5 V. Its CEmax and PEmax reached 67.0 cd/A and 84.1 lm/W, respectively, while the EQEmax achieved an impressive 25.5%. The device exhibited chromaticity coordinates of (0.40, 0.43). Lee et al. concluded that S-EML hybrid WOLEDs provide favorable conditions for fabricating large-area and low-cost devices through solution-processing methods [34]. The device based on the exciplex formed by CDBP: PO-T2T has demonstrated remarkable efficiency, attracting widespread attention. In 2018, He et al. successfully achieved a high-efficiency, non-doped WOLED by inserting an ultrathin yellow, fluorescent layer, 2,8-Di-tert-butyl-5,11-bis(4-tert-butylphenyl)-6,12-diphenyltetracene (TBRb), into the bilayer blue exciplex system formed by CDBP and PO-T2T (Figure 11). The final device achieved a CEmax of 27.2 cd/A, a PEmax of 21.4 lm/W, and an EQEmax of 11.2%, with CIE coordinates of (0.35, 0.39). By inserting the ultrathin layer, they found that the trapping of charges by the yellow dye could be suppressed, thereby enhancing the device’s efficiency [63]. In 2019, Ma et al. fabricated a high-efficiency, low-efficiency roll-off WOLED by inserting an ultrathin layer of yellow phosphorescent Bis(4-phenylthieno[3,2-c]pyridinato-N,C2′) (acetylacetonate) iridium(III) (PO-01) into the mixed EML of CDBP:PO-T2T. By inserting the yellow dye into the exciplex-based mixed layer, the phosphorescent layer was uniformly distributed in the exciton distribution zone, allowing excitons to transfer directly to the phosphorescent emitters, thereby reducing exciton quenching and improving exciton utilization. The high-efficiency WOLED proposed by Ma et al. achieved an EQEmax of 20.4%, with CEmax and PEmax values of 62.8 cd/A and 75.9 lm/W, respectively, and CIE coordinates of (0.42, 0.47). By broadening the exciton distribution region and actively improving exciton utilization, the strategy successfully enhanced WOLED efficiency and reduced efficiency roll-off [64].
Although two-color OLEDs exhibit high efficiency and stable spectra, their poor color purity and consistently low color rendering index (CRI), which is always below 80, limit their commercial applications. Therefore, further development of two-color WOLEDs with high CRI and high efficiency has become a key research focus. In 2017, Li et al. fabricated a complementary-color WOLED with high CRI by introducing Bis[2-(diphenylphosphino)phenyl]ether oxide (DPEPO) as a spacer, using mCP: PO-T2T as the blue exciplex and TAPC: PO-T2T as the orange exciplex. By increasing the number of spacers and optimizing their positions, the red and blue emissions were effectively balanced. The final WOLED achieved a CEmax of 16.2 cd/A, a PEmax of 11.3 lm/W, and an EQEmax of 7.92%, with CIE coordinates of (0.31 ± 0.00, 0.37 ± 0.02). Notably, its CRI reached 83, meeting commercial standards [5]. In 2019, Ma et al. developed a low-efficiency roll-off and high-efficiency fluorescent WOLED by inserting a hole-transporting layer (TCTA) into the blue exciplex 26DCzPPy: PO-T2T. The study revealed that introducing a TCTA interlayer into the EML formed a transitional interfacial exciplex with PO-T2T. The resulting green exciplex was capable of absorbing part of the energy from the blue exciplex for light emission and efficiently transferring the remaining energy to the yellow, fluorescent dye TBRb. This mechanism effectively reduced exciton quenching in 26DCzPPy: PO-T2T, improved exciton utilization, significantly lowered efficiency roll-off, and enhanced device efficiency. As shown in Figure 12, the resulting WOLED achieved CEmax, PEmax, and EQEmax of 32.6 cd/A, 35.9 lm/W, and 10.1%, respectively. Even at a brightness of 1000 cd/m², the device still maintained the efficiencies of 25.6 cd/A, 16.1 lm/W, and 8.1%. Furthermore, it exhibited a low Von of only 2.8 V and a CIE coordinate of (0.36, 0.53). By introducing a specialized interlayer into the EML to effectively reduce efficiency roll-off, this approach provides a feasible solution for improving WOLED efficiency while offering valuable insights for future device design [65].
Electroplex emission, often considered to reduce device efficiency, is also associated with lowered color purity due to its red-shifted nature compared to monomer emission in OLED devices. In 2015, Chen and co-workers fabricated the TAPC:26DCzPPy exciplex emitter for organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) by blending the electron-rich hole-transporting material TAPC (1,1-bis[4-[N,N-di(p-tolyl)amino]phenyl]cyclohexane) with the bipolar acceptor material 26DCzPPy in a mixed ratio. Their investigation revealed that TAPC:26DCzPPy-based OLEDs exhibited mixed exciplex and electroplex emissions, resulting in white light emission with an exciplex peak at 450 nm and an electroplex peak at 585 nm. Devices utilizing this system as the emitting layer achieved a maximum EQEmax of 1.13% and a CEmax of 2.19 cd/A. This study elucidated the role of intermolecular CT interactions between electron-rich donors and bipolar acceptors in exciplex formation, offering valuable insights for developing efficient white or multicolor OLEDs, although the overall efficiency remains low and requires further enhancement [66]. In 2023, Zhang et al. successfully fabricated a highly efficient WOLED by combining exciplex emission with electromer emission to construct a bimolecular excited system. They first prepared the blue exciplex TAPC: TPBi, which exhibited a high-energy peak at 462 nm. Due to the recombination of neighboring electron-hole pairs, this material also displayed a low-energy peak at 586 nm under electrical excitation. To further improve device performance, they developed a green exciplex (4,4′,4″-Tris(N-3-methylphenyl-N-phenyl-amino)-triphenylamine) m-MTDATA: TPBi. Owing to the high T1 value of TAPC: TPBi, part of the energy could be transferred to m-MTDATA: TPBi for green light emission, while the remaining energy contributed to the blue light emission from TAPC: TPBi itself. The structure of the fluorescence-based WOLED, constructed on the bimolecular excited system, which did not contain fluorescent dyes, achieved a CEmax of 11.3 cd/A and a PEmax of 11.8 lm/W, with a low Von of only 2.76 V. Remarkably, the device achieved CIE coordinates of (0.33, 0.38), which are very close to the ideal white light coordinates of (0.33, 0.33), and a CRI of 81, meeting commercial application standards. Zhang et al. noted that the TAPC: TPBi mixed layer played a critical role in the device, not only generating red and blue dual-color emissions simultaneously but also regulating exciton recombination in the EML, balancing carrier transport, improving device efficiency, and reducing Von [67]. Table 2 summarizes the performance of exciplexes as emitters applied to WOLEDs as mentioned in Section 3.2.

4. Blue Exciplexes as Hosts and Cohosts in OLEDs

Frontier Molecular Orbitals (FMOs), including HOMO and LUMO, are key to understanding electron distribution and charge transfer in donor-acceptor (D/A) systems in OLEDs [19]. Their alignment boosts exciton generation and minimizes energy loss, enhancing device efficiency and stability [68]. Unlike TADF materials, in exciplex-based OLEDs, electrons and holes inject into acceptors’ LUMOs and donors’ HOMOs, respectively, followed by electron exchange between D/A FMOs. Exciplex hosts show strong bipolarity and low injection barriers, improving performance while retaining TADF effects.
The RISC in exciplex systems enables upconverted singlet excitons to transfer to dopants via Förster resonance energy transfer (rather than Dexter transfer), a more efficient pathway that reduces efficiency roll-off. Exciplex emission typically involves spectral broadening and red-shift, making high color purity challenging, thus rendering exciplexes more suitable as hosts than emitters [37,38,69,70,71].
For an exciplex to function as an effective host, it must meet specific conditions: (i) the triplet state (T1) of the exciplex should be lower than that of the individual D/A counterparts to confine the excitation energy within the exciplex; (ii) the exciplex T1 must be higher than that of the dopant to ensure emission originates from the dopant; and (iii) the emission of the exciplex should have adequate overlap with the dopant’s absorption spectrum to enable efficient energy transfer. This section gathers recent findings on the application of exciplex hosts or co-hosts in high-efficiency OLEDs [70,72,73].

4.1. Blue Exciplexes as Host in OLEDs

In OLEDs, the combination of a blue exciplex host with a blue phosphorescent dopant offers significant advantages for both efficiency and device stability. This host-dopant system leverages the high IQE of phosphorescent materials, enabling near-complete utilization of triplet excitons. The exciplex host, with its favorable triplet energy transfer properties, supports efficient triplet harvesting and minimizes non-radiative decay pathways, making it highly compatible with blue phosphorescent dopants.[74,75] Moreover, the exciplex-hosted phosphorescent structure not only enhances device lifetime but also provides improved color stability, addressing the challenges typically associated with the longevity and color purity of blue OLEDs [76].
In this context, Kim et al. reported a breakthrough device design, utilizing mCP as a donor material and B3PYMPM as an acceptor material to form a blue exciplex host. By doping the blue phosphorescent dopant Bis[2-(4,6-difluorophenyl)pyridinato-C2,N](picolinato)iridium(III) (FIrpic) into the exciplex host, the device achieved a maximum EQE of 29.5% with a CE of 62.2 cd/A (Figure 13). The exciplex structure’s ability to confine triplet excitons effectively and support RISC allows both singlet and triplet excitons to contribute to emission. Additionally, the exciplex host showed a low driving voltage of 3 V and minimal efficiency roll-off, making it suitable for high-brightness applications [77].
Traditional electron donor materials such as mCP, TAPC, and TCTA have been widely used, but efficient electron acceptor materials in exciplex systems remain relatively scarce. To address this issue, Hu et al. designed and synthesized a novel benzoimidazole-containing electron acceptor material, 1,1′,1″-(pyridine-2,4,6-triyl)tris(2-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole) iTPyBIPy, through a simple one-step C–N coupling reaction (Figure 14). They introduced an isomeric N-linkage into iTPyBIPy, which significantly simplified the synthesis process. Using mCP as the donor material and FIrpic as the dopant, the fabricated blue phosphorescent OLED exhibited excellent performance with a maximum efficiency of 38.5 cd/A, 36.9 lm/W, and an EQEmax of 19.3%, along with a satisfactory CIE color coordinate of (0.15, 0.29). This work fills the gap in the application of benzoimidazole-containing electron acceptor materials in exciplex-based devices [78]. Lee et al. first applied the high-triplet-energy (N,N-bis(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)-3,5-bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9Hcarbazol-9-yl)aniline) t-DCDPA: DBFTrz (2,8-bis(4,6-diphenyl1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)dibenzo[b,d]furan) exciplex host in deep-blue PhOLEDs, achieving an EQE of 16.4% and color coordinates of (0.14, 0.19) with tris[2,6difluoro-3-(pyridin-2-yl)benzonitrile]iridium(III) (FCNIr) as the emitter, pioneering the use of exciplex hosts in deep-blue phosphorescent devices and providing a key foundation for further studies [79]. In the same year, Kim et al. employed a high-triplet-energy mCP:BM-A10 exciplex host (T1 > 2.8 eV) with FCNIr as the emitter, achieving a deep-blue PhOLED with an EQE of 24%, CIE coordinates of (0.15, 0.21), and a turn-on voltage of 2.9 V, with a lifetime markedly surpassing single-host systems, highlighting the advantages of exciplex hosts in enhancing deep-blue device performance [13]. In 2018, Lee et al. generated an exciplex by mixing 2,2′-Di(9H-carbazol-9-yl)biphenyl (oCBP) and 9-(3′-(9Hcarbazol-9-yl)-5-cyano-[1,1′-biphenyl]-3-yl)-9H-carbazole-3-carbonitrile (CNmCBPCN) host materials, with a triplet energy of 2.94 eV and a singlet energy of 3.30 eV. This exciplex host achieved an external quantum efficiency of 18.8% in blue phosphorescent OLEDs and extended the lifetime by more than 1.8 times [80].
Although the exciplex co-host system stands out as a highly promising approach for achieving high-performance phosphorescent OLEDs, further improvements are still needed to achieve blue OLEDs with excellent color purity. In 2020, Chen et al. successfully constructed an exciplex co-host system formed by the donor of mCP and the acceptor of 4,6-Bis(3,5-di(pyridin-4-yl)phenyl)-2-phenylpyrimidine (B4PyPPM). Compared to traditional host-based devices using mCP, the blue phosphorescent OLEDs based on the exciplex co-host exhibited stable color purity and a higher EQE of 20.1%. The result demonstrated the potential of the co-host system as an effective strategy for developing simplified OLEDs with outstanding performance, suitable for future solid-state lighting and display applications [81]. Although several exciplex hosts for blue phosphors have been reported, only a limited number can effectively harvest triplet excitons from pure-blue phosphors, and none have demonstrated the ability to guarantee lifetime. Therefore, in the same year, Kim et al. utilized an mCBP: SiCzTrz (9-(4-Phenyl-6-(3-(triphenylsilyl)phenyl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-9H-carbazole) electroplex host with Ir(cb)₃ as the dopant to develop pure-blue PhOLEDs, achieving an EQE of 27.6%, an LT50 exceeding 10,000 h at 100 cd/m², and CIE coordinates of (0.12, 0.13), underscoring the superiority of electroplex hosts for high-efficiency, long-lifetime pure-blue devices [74].
Extensive research has enabled high-efficiency PhOLEDs with single exciplex hosts. However, enhancing efficiency at high luminance remains a key challenge, limiting applications in solid-state lighting and bright displays [31]. In 2021, Ma et al. utilized dual exciplex hosts mCBP: PO-T2T and mCBP: B4PyPPM for the FIrpic emitter, markedly enhancing blue PhOLED performance with an EQE of 25.61% and a CE of 45.77 cd/A, while effectively reducing roll-off at high luminance, demonstrating the potential of dual-host strategies in optimizing exciplex-based OLEDs [82]. In the same year, Vasilopoulou et al. combined a low triplet energy HTM (T2FQ/TQ2F) with a (bis(diphenylphosphine oxide)dibenzofuran) DBFPO/TSPO1 (diphenyl[4-(triphenylsilyl)phenyl]phosphine oxide) interface exciplex to confine excitons, achieving efficient blue TADF OLEDs with a 2.5 V turn-on voltage, an EQE of 41.2%, and 34.8% at 1000 cd/m² with low roll-off, underscoring the potential of device engineering in enhancing blue OLED performance [83].
Blue PhOLEDs have been regarded as a highly promising alternative to blue FOLEDs. However, previously reported blue PhOLEDs with CIE y coordinates below 0.2 have exhibited LT70 values (the time to reach 70% of the initial brightness) of less than 100 h at an initial brightness (L0) of 1000 cd/m², a performance insufficient for practical applications [84]. Kim et al. (2022) utilized a (9-(3-(triphenylsilyl)phenyl)-9H-3,9′-bicarbazole) SiCzCz: SiTrzCz2 (9,9′-(6-(3-(Triphenylsilyl)phenyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diyl)bis(9H-carbazole)) exciplex host and optimized PtON-TBBI (BD-02) dopant to develop deep-blue PhOLEDs, achieving an EQE of 25.4%, a CIE y = 0.197, and an LT70 of 1113 h at 1000 cd/m², significantly improving color purity and lifetime, and demonstrating a breakthrough in exciplex-hosted deep-blue phosphorescent devices [85]. In 2024, Li et al. developed a deep-blue PhOLED using a (9-(3-(triphenylsilyl)phenyl)−9H-3,9-bicarbazole) SiBCz:SiTrzCz2 exciplex host and PtON5N-dtb dopant, achieving a peak EQE of 20.4%, retaining 18.5% at 1000 cd/m², with an LT90 of 85 h and CIE coordinates of (0.13, 0.17), highlighting the exceptional potential of exciplex hosts in low-roll-off, long-lifetime deep-blue devices [86]. Recently, Jang Hyuk Kwon reported n-type hosts CNCzPyDFCN and CNDFPyCzCN (T1 > 2.96 eV), designed via simulation and paired with oCBP as exciplex hosts for blue PhOLEDs. The oCBP:CNCzPyDFCN host achieved an EQE of 29% and LT50 of 33.9 h at 1000 cd/m², demonstrating excellent stability, whereas oCBP:CNDFPyCzCN reached 26.6% EQE but only 8.2 h lifetime, underscoring the critical role of exciplex design in blue device performance [87].

4.2. WOLEDs Based on Blue Exciplexes as Hosts

Although several high-performance blue OLEDs based on exciplex host systems have been reported, research on the development of WOLEDs using exciplex hosts remains relatively limited. In 2016, Ma et al. utilized the mCP:B3PYMPM exciplex host with FIrpic as the blue phosphor and ultrathin PO-01 as the yellow layer to develop a structurally simple WOLED, achieving an EQE of 20.0%, a CE of 64.5 cd/A, and a low turn-on voltage of 2.4 V, highlighting the potential of exciplex hosts in designing efficient white light devices [88]. To meet the requirements for lighting applications, the PE generally needs to exceed 100 lm/W, yet the lack of suitable out-coupling enhancement devices remains a challenge to overcome [89]. In 2017, Fung et al. utilized an mCP:B4PyMPM (4,6-Bis(3,5-di(pyridin-4-yl)phenyl)-2-methylpyrimidine) exciplex host (T1 = 2.75 eV) to design a single-EML hybrid WOLED with FIrpic and PO-01 as emitters. As shown in Figure 15, the device achieved a PE of 105.0 lm/W, EQE of 28.1%, and CIE (0.40, 0.48), with a predicted PE up to 210 lm/W, demonstrating the potential of exciplex hosts in efficient, energy-saving white light devices [90]. To bring WOLED devices into practical production, it is essential to ensure not only sufficient efficiency but also excellent color stability. Sheng et al. developed a WOLED using the mCP:B4PyPPM exciplex co-host with FIrpic and PO-01 dopants. The resulting WOLED achieved an EQE of 21.7%, a CE of 66.4 cd/A, and a Von of 2.5 V, with a CIE shift of only (0.008, 0.002) over 4-7 V, highlighting the potential of exciplex hosts in efficient and spectrally stable white light devices [81].
In the formation of co-host systems, it is commonly observed that high efficiency is often accompanied by a decline in color quality. Therefore, developing a device that achieves both high efficiency and a good color gamut is a challenge worth exploring. In 2019, Liao et al. harnessed the 26DCzPPy:B4PyMPM exciplex co-host, integrating FIrpic and PO-01 dopants, to craft a WOLED. At a 4.0% PO-01 doping level, the device delivered an EQE of 27.3%, a CE of 79.0 cd/A, and a PE of 89.0 lm/W, with a mere 2.7 V turn-on voltage. Exhibiting minimal green emission and an impressive color gamut, this approach underscores the distinctive potential of exciplex systems for high-performance white light applications [91]. Leveraging a 26DCzPPy/B4PyPPM interfacial exciplex, Sheng et al. engineered a single-EML WOLED that, with excellent energy alignment and low PO-01 doping to curb Dexter transfer, attained an EQE of 23.1%, a CE of 81.1 cd/A, and a PE of 101.9 lm/W at an ultra-low 2.4 V turn-on voltage, alongside CIE coordinates of (0.45, 0.49), signaling a forward-looking trend in efficient, simplified white light device design (Figure 16) [92]. Recently, Xie et al. harnessed a Trz-PhCz:B4PyMPM exciplex co-host to integrate green, yellow, orange, and red phosphorescent emitters into OLEDs, yielding EQE values from 25.0% to 32.5%, while employing mCBP:B4PyMPM raised the blue OLED EQE to 26.3%; by skillfully blending blue and yellow EMLs, a two-color WOLED driven at 2.2 V delivered a PE of 137.4 lm/W and EQE of 36.9%, sustaining high efficiency at 1000 cd/m², underscoring the utility of exciplex systems in multicolored, high-performance white light devices [93].
Recently, the strategy of using blue exciplexes as hosts combined with TADF materials to improve device efficiency and stability has attracted significant attention. Researchers have explored applying TADF dopants within blue exciplex-based host systems, leveraging the advantages of both: exciplexes offer a broad emission spectrum and charge balance capability, while TADF emitters provide efficient exciton harvesting. Incorporating TADF materials into exciplex hosts enables the effective utilization of singlet and triplet excitons. Currently, TADF OLED devices using exciplexes as the primary emitters, especially S-EML WOLEDs employing TADF-sensitized fluorescence (TSF), remain relatively scarce. Due to the lack of stable blue exciplex compounds, such devices often face issues such as low blue light efficiency and significant efficiency roll-off [15]. In 2020, Duan et al. introduced an innovative cyan exciplex, 9-(9,9′-spirobi[fluoren]-3-yl)-9′-phenyl-9H,9′H3,3′-bicarbazole (SFBCZ): SFTRZ (2-(3′-(9,9′-spirobi[fluoren]-3-yl)-[1,1′biphenyl]-3-yl)-4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazine), utilizing bipolar large-volume π-spaced groups to widen the D-A subunit distance, markedly extending blue-shift emission while refining charge transport properties (Figure 17). By channeling excitons through multiple energy funnel processes within a broad charge-complex region, this approach mitigated exciton annihilation at high current densities, substantially enhancing the lifespan and stability of WOLEDs [69]. The authors employed the SFBCZ:SFTRZ exciplex as the central emitter, integrating it with the blue TADF sensitizer 2,3,4,5,6-pentakis-(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)benzonitrile (5TCzBN) and yellow fluorescent dopant TBRb to construct a single-layer warm white OLED, which delivered an EQE of 21.4% and PE of 69.6 lm/W at a low driving voltage of 3.08 V, with a T80 surpassing 8200 h, highlighting the potential of combining exciplexes and TADF for efficient, durable white light devices. Chen et al. (2022) engineered a single-layer WOLED with a 26DCzPPy:PO-T2T interfacial exciplex and 10-(4-(4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)phenyl)-10H-spiro[acridine-9,9′-fluorene] (SpiroAC-TRZ) sensitizer, operating at a low turn-on voltage of 2.7 V, yielding a CE of 52.4 cd/A and PE of 60.9 lm/W, with efficiency roll-off limited to 14.5% at 500 cd/m², marking a breakthrough for ultrathin-layer structures in low-roll-off white light devices [94]. In the same year, Wang et al. capitalized on a high-T1 (3.15 eV) mCP/mSiTRZ (2-Phenyl-4,6-bis(3-(triphenylsilyl)phenyl)-1,3,5-triazine) interface exciplex combined with rapid-RISC (1.15 × 107 s−1) 5CzTRZ to produce a blue OLED, securing a peak EQE of 28.1%, sustained at 27.32% under 1000 cd/m² luminance; they further crafted an all-TADF WOLED by sensitizing 5, 10-bis(4-(9,9- dimethylacridin-10(9H)-yl)-2,6-dimethylphenyl)5,10-dihydroboran-threne (dmACDBA) with 5CzTRZ, yielding a driving voltage of just 3.1 V, an EQE of 27.3%, and a PE of 70.4 lm/W, exemplifying remarkable advances in efficiency and stability for solution-processed white light devices [49].
Although interface exciplexes are considered suitable for use in solution-processed OLEDs, their exciton recombination region is confined to the interface between the EML and ETL. Without precise control of the EML thickness to facilitate effective energy transfer to the dopants, this limitation can result in the wastage of holes and electrons, leading to low device efficiency and severe efficiency roll-off. In 2023, Chen et al. employed solution processing to construct a TAPC:POPH (T1=3.01 eV) bulk exciplex and a TAPC/TmPyPB (1,3,5-Tri[(3-pyridyl)-phen-3-yl]benzene) (T1=3.13 eV) interface exciplex (Figure 18), paired with the 10-(4-(4,6-Diphenyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)phenyl)-9,9-dimethyl-9,10-dihydroacridine (DMAC-TRZ) emitter, setting a record EQE of 26.7% for solution-processed blue TADF OLEDs; subsequent doping with Bis(2-phenylquinoline)(2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionate)iridium(III) (Ir(DPM)PQ2) produced a hybrid white OLED with an EQE of 24.1% and nearly voltage-invariant spectra, revealing the transformative potential of dual-exciplex designs for efficient and stable white light devices [33].
In recent years, multi-resonance thermally activated delayed fluorescence (MR-TADF) materials have gradually become a research hotspot in OLED devices due to their high efficiency, pure color purity, and simple design. In particular, combining MR-TADF materials with exciplexes to fabricate OLED devices has emerged as a frontier in this field. In 2024, Su et al. successfully combined a (3,3′-(2,5-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene) bis(9-phenyl-9Hcarbazole) PhBCzPh: PO-T2T: DspiroAc-TRZ ternary exciplex (PLQY 72%, kRISC 2.0 × 107 s−1) with the efficient MR-TADF material 2TCzBN to produce a sky-blue OLED, as shown in Figure 19. The device operated at a mere 2.5 V driving voltage, delivering a CE of 65.9 cd/A and an EQE of 36.2% with minimal roll-off; by blending blue and orange emission units, they achieved a warm white dual-EML OLED with an EQE exceeding 30%, underscoring the remarkable promise of ternary exciplex systems for narrow-band, high-efficiency white light devices [95]. Table 3 summarizes the performance of all exciplex-based host devices in Section 4.

5. Conclusions

This review systematically examined the dual roles of exciplexes as emitters and hosts: as emitters, blue exciplexes achieve high color purity and efficiency through optimized molecular design, outperforming traditional fluorescent and phosphorescent materials; as hosts, their wide energy bands and high triplet energy enable efficient exciton utilization and stable energy transfer, significantly advancing the performance of sky-blue, deep-blue, and white OLEDs. Consequently, OLEDs based on blue exciplexes exhibit exceptional potential in efficiency, turn-on voltage, and stability. However, challenges such as a limited deep-blue gamut, degradation induced by high-energy excitons, and spectral red-shift persist, impeding color purity and lifetime from meeting commercial standards.
Although blue exciplex designs have made strides in expanding exciton distribution and energy transfer, further improvements in emission efficiency and longevity are still required. Therefore, future research must delve deeper into the photophysical processes of blue exciplexes and develop new material systems with high PLQY and stability to address current limitations, thereby hastening their practical implementation in display and lighting applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Y. and P.C.; methodology, M.Z.; software, X.J.; validation, X.J., L.Y., and J.W.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, L.Y., J.W., and R.S.; resources, J.W.; data curation, R.S. and J.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Y. (Section 1, Section 3.1, Section 4.1, Abstract), M.Z. (Section 2, Section 3.2, Section 4.2), P.C. (Section 5); writing—review and editing, X.J.; visualization, J.S. and Y.Z.; supervision, P.C. and J.W.; project administration, P.C.; funding acquisition, R.S. and P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62474154, 62205281, 62475028).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CECurrent efficiency
CIECommission Internationale de l’Éclairage
CTCharge transfer
ΔESTSinglet-triplet energy gap
EQEExternal quantum efficiency
FMOFrontier Molecular Orbital
HOMOHighest Occupied Molecular Orbital
IQEInternal quantum efficiency
LUMOLowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital
MDPIMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
MR-TADFMulti-resonance thermally activated delayed fluorescence
NTSCNational Television System Committee
OLEDOrganic light-emitting diode
PEPower efficiency
PhOLEDPhosphorescent organic light-emitting diode
PLQYPhotoluminescence quantum yield
RISCReverse intersystem crossing
TADFThermally activated delayed fluorescence
TRPLTime-Resolved Photoluminescence
TTETTriplet-triplet energy transfer
TTFTriplet-triplet fusion
WOLEDWhite organic light-emitting diode
−ΔGcsDriving force
TSFTADF-sensitized fluorescence
FWHMFull width at half maximum

References

  1. Kido, J.; Shionoya, H.; Nagai, K. Single-Layer White Light-Emitting Organic Electroluminescent Devices Based on Dye-Dispersed Poly(N-Vinylcarbazole). Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995, 67, 2281–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, B.; Yang, Z.; Karasz, F.E. Electroluminescence of Pure Poly(N-Vinylcarbazole) and Its Blends with a Multiblock Copolymer. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 76, 2419–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, C.W.; VanSlyke, S.A. Organic Electroluminescent Diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1987, 51, 913–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baldo, M.A.; O’Brien, D.F.; Thompson, M.E.; Forrest, S.R. Excitonic Singlet-Triplet Ratio in a Semiconducting Organic Thin Film. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 14422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhao, B.; Zhang, H.; Miao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Gao, L.; Wang, H.; Hao, Y.; Li, W. High Color Stability and CRI (>80) Fluorescent White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based Pure Emission of Exciplex by Employing Merely Complementary Colors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 6, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Luo, D.; Li, X.-L.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, Y.; Liu, B. High-Performance Blue Molecular Emitter-Free and Doping-Free Hybrid White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes: An Alternative Concept to Manipulate Charges and Excitons Based on Exciplex and Electroplex Emission. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 1566–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pope, M.; Swenberg, C.E. Electronic Processes in Organic Crystals and Polymers; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  8. Adachi, C.; Baldo, M.A.; Thompson, M.E.; Forrest, S.R. Nearly 100% Internal Phosphorescence Efficiency in an Organic Light-Emitting Device. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 90, 5048–5051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baldo, M.A.; O’Brien, D.F.; You, Y.; Shoustikov, A.; Sibley, S.; Thompson, M.E.; Forrest, S.R. Highly Effcient Phosphorescent Emission from Organic Electroluminescent Devices. Nature 1998, 395, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Q.; Tian, Q.-S.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Tang, X.; Liao, L.-S. High-Efficiency Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with Exciplex Hosts. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 11329–11360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarma, M.; Chen, L.-M.; Chen, Y.-S.; Wong, K.-T. Exciplexes in OLEDs: Principles and Promises. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2022, 150, 100689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goushi, K.; Adachi, C. Delayed Fluorescence by Reverse Intersystem Crossing and Application to Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics 2012, San Jose, CA, USA, 6–11 May 2012; OSA: San Jose, CA, USA, 2012; p. CF1A.1. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lim, H.; Shin, H.; Kim, K.-H.; Yoo, S.-J.; Huh, J.-S.; Kim, J.-J. An Exciplex Host for Deep-Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 37883–37887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, J.; Lin, X.; Lei, H.; Li, J.; Kou, Z. The Effect of the Exciplex Heterojunction Interlayer on Efficiency Roll-off in Non-Doped Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Opt. Mater. 2020, 99, 109561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, B.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Xu, B.; Wu, Y.; Li, W. Structural Design for Highly Efficient Pure Fluorescent Warm WOLEDs by Employing TADF Molecule as Blue Emitter and Exciplex Donor. Org. Electron. 2019, 73, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Yuan, Y.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Liao, L. Solution-Processed Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Exciplex Hosts for Highly Efficient Blue Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1700012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, H.; Maheshwaran, A.; Moon, C.; Lee, H.; Reddy, S.S.; Sree, V.G.; Yoon, J.; Kim, J.W.; Kwon, J.H.; Kim, J.; et al. External Quantum Efficiency Exceeding 24% with CIE y Value of 0.08 Using a Novel Carbene-Based Iridium Complex in Deep-Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2002120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Anandan, M.; Kment, S.; Zboril, R.; Kalytchuk, S.; Janusas, G.; Managutti, P.B.; Mohamed, S.; Mazloumihaghghi, R.; Hosseinnezhad, M.; Nunzi, J.M.; et al. High Triplet Hexahydroacridine Derivatives as a Host Prevent Exciton Diffusion to Adjacent Layers in Solution Processed OLEDs. Org. Electron. 2025, 136, 107162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yadav, R.A.K.; Dubey, D.K.; Chen, S.-Z.; Liang, T.-W.; Jou, J.-H. Role of Molecular Orbital Energy Levels in OLED Performance. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.; Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Gong, H.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Q. Advances in Blue Exciplex–Based Organic Light-Emitting Materials and Devices. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 952116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hippola, C.; Danilovic, D.; Bhattacharjee, U.; Perez-Bolivar, C.; Sachinthani, K.A.N.; Nelson, T.L.; Anzenbacher, P.; Petrich, J.W.; Shinar, R.; Shinar, J. Bright Deep Blue TADF OLEDs: The Role of Triphenylphosphine Oxide in NPB/TPBi:PPh3 O Exciplex Emission. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 0191282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xia, Q.; Xiang, Y.; Gong, Y.; Li, S.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Fu, H. Development of a Deep-Blue Exciplex as an Emitter and a Host for Highly Efficient and Wide-Color OLEDs. J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 6354–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Z.; Dou, D.; Xia, R.; Wu, P.; Spuling, E.; Wang, K.; Cao, J.; Wei, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.; et al. Efficient Deep-Blue Luminescence Based on Dual-Channel Intra/Intermolecular Exciplexes. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadf4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, J.; Gong, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Tao, L.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Q. Efficient Exciplex-Based Deep-Blue Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Employing a Bis(4-Fluorophenyl)Amine-Substituted Heptazine Acceptor. Molecules 2021, 26, 5568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gebler, D.D.; Wang, Y.Z.; Blatchford, J.W.; Jessen, S.W.; Fu, D.-K.; Swager, T.M.; MacDiarmid, A.G.; Epstein, A.J. Exciplex Emission in Bilayer Polymer Light-Emitting Devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 70, 1644–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Goushi, K.; Yoshida, K.; Sato, K.; Adachi, C. Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Employing Efficient Reverse Intersystem Crossing for Triplet-to-Singlet State Conversion. Nat. Photon. 2012, 6, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Itano, K.; Ogawa, H.; Shirota, Y. Exciplex Formation at the Organic Solid-State Interface: Yellow Emission in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Using Green-Fluorescent Tris(8-Quinolinolato)Aluminum and Hole-Transporting Molecular Materials with Low Ionization Potentials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 72, 636–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, C.; Liu, C.; Lee, C.; Li, F.; Ou, X.; Zhang, X. Prediction and Design of Efficient Exciplex Emitters for High-Efficiency, Thermally Activated Delayed-Fluorescence Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2378–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baek, H.J.; Lee, S.E.; Lee, H.W.; Yun, G.J.; Park, J.; Kim, W.Y.; Kim, Y.K. White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Using Exciplex Emission with Multiple Emitting Layers. Phys. Status Solidi (A) 2018, 215, 1700530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, T.; Zhao, B.; Chu, B.; Li, W.; Su, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Jin, F.; Yan, X.; Gao, Y.; et al. Blue Exciplex Emission and Its Role as a Host of Phosphorescent Emitter. Org. Electron. 2015, 24, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, M.; Ma, X.-C.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Yang, G.; Lin, H.; Zheng, C.-J.; Du, X.; Tao, S. Utilizing Spiro-Type Backbone Donor to Develop Exciplex Emitter and Highly Efficient Phosphorescent OLEDs With Low Efficiency Roll-Off. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2024, 71, 6864–6870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, J.; Yuan, S.; Du, X.; Li, W.; Zheng, C.; Tao, S.; Zhang, X. White OLEDs with an EQE of 21% at 5000 Cd m−2 and Ultra High Color Stability Based on Exciplex Host. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cheng, W.-C.; Tsai, M.R.; Chen, S.-A. Creation of Dual Thermally Activated Delayed-Fluorescence Exciplexes in a Bulk Emitting Layer and Its Interface with an Electron Transport Layer for Promoting the Performance of Thermally Activated Delayed-Fluorescence Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Fabricated by a Solution Process. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 31692–31702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Qing, J.; Zhang, W.; Wu, B.; Tam, H.L.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, X.; Lee, C. Remanagement of Singlet and Triplet Excitons in Single-Emissive-Layer Hybrid White Organic Light-Emitting Devices Using Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescent Blue Exciplex. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7079–7085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jankus, V.; Chiang, C.; Dias, F.; Monkman, A.P. Deep Blue Exciplex Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with Enhanced Efficiency; P-type or E-type Triplet Conversion to Singlet Excitons? Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, H.-B.; Kim, J.-J. Recent Progress on Exciplex-Emitting OLEDs. J. Inf. Disp. 2019, 20, 105–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ban, X.; Sun, K.; Sun, Y.; Huang, B.; Jiang, W. Design of High Triplet Energy Electron Transporting Material for Exciplex-Type Host: Efficient Blue and White Phosphorescent OLEDs Based on Solution Processing. Org. Electron. 2016, 33, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, J.; Cheng, S.; Yoo, S.; Shin, H.; Chang, J.; Wu, C.; Wong, K.; Kim, J. An Exciplex Forming Host for Highly Efficient Blue Organic Light Emitting Diodes with Low Driving Voltage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Park, Y.-S.; Kim, K.-H.; Kim, J.-J. Efficient Triplet Harvesting by Fluorescent Molecules through Exciplexes for High Efficiency Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 153306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hung, W.-Y.; Fang, G.-C.; Lin, S.-W.; Cheng, S.-H.; Wong, K.-T.; Kuo, T.-Y.; Chou, P.-T. The First Tandem, All-Exciplex-Based WOLED. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, T.; Zhao, B.; Chu, B.; Li, W.; Su, Z.; Yan, X.; Liu, C.; Wu, H.; Gao, Y.; Jin, F.; et al. Simple Structured Hybrid WOLEDs Based on Incomplete Energy Transfer Mechanism: From Blue Exciplex to Orange Dopant. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chapran, M.; Pander, P.; Vasylieva, M.; Wiosna-Salyga, G.; Ulanski, J.; Dias, F.B.; Data, P. Realizing 20% External Quantum Efficiency in Electroluminescence with Efficient Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence from an Exciplex. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 13460–13471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Oh, C.S.; Kang, Y.J.; Jeon, S.K.; Lee, J.Y. High Efficiency Exciplex Emitters Using Donor–Acceptor Type Acceptor Material. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 22618–22624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hung, W.-Y.; Wang, T.-C.; Chiang, P.-Y.; Peng, B.-J.; Wong, K.-T. Remote Steric Effect as a Facile Strategy for Improving the Efficiency of Exciplex-Based OLEDs. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 7355–7361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, Z.; Liu, X.-K.; Zheng, C.-J.; Ye, J.; Liu, C.-L.; Li, F.; Ou, X.-M.; Lee, C.-S.; Zhang, X.-H. High Performance Exciplex-Based Fluorescence–Phosphorescence White Organic Light-Emitting Device with Highly Simplified Structure. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 5206–5211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mamada, M.; Tian, G.; Nakanotani, H.; Su, J.; Adachi, C. The Importance of Excited-State Energy Alignment for Efficient Exciplex Systems Based on a Study of Phenylpyridinato Boron Derivatives. Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 12560–12564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lin, T.-C.; Sarma, M.; Chen, Y.-T.; Liu, S.-H.; Lin, K.-T.; Chiang, P.-Y.; Chuang, W.-T.; Liu, Y.-C.; Hsu, H.-F.; Hung, W.-Y.; et al. Probe Exciplex Structure of Highly Efficient Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Organic Light Emitting Diodes. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yuan, W.; Yang, H.; Zhang, M.; Hu, D.; Sun, N.; Tao, Y. N-Benzoimidazole/Oxadiazole Hybrid Universal Electron Acceptors for Highly Efficient Exciplex-Type Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence OLEDs. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, L.; Chang, Y.; Shi, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, L. Solution-Processed White OLEDs with Power Efficiency over 90 Lm W−1 by Triplet Exciton Management with a High Triplet Energy Level Interfacial Exciplex Host and a High Reverse Intersystem Crossing Rate Blue TADF Emitter. Mater. Horiz. 2022, 9, 1299–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xie, Y.; Hua, L.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ying, S.; Liu, Y.; Ren, Z.; Yan, S. Constructing an Efficient Deep-Blue TADF Emitter by Host-Guest Interactions towards Solution-Processed OLEDs with Narrowband Emission. Sci. China Chem. 2023, 66, 826–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rajeev, K.; Vipin, C.K.; Sajeev, A.K.; Shukla, A.; McGregor, S.K.M.; Lo, S.-C.; Namdas, E.B.; Narayanan Unni, K.N. Blue Emitting Exciplex for Yellow and White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Front. Optoelectron. 2023, 16, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pan, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, S.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, W.; Liu, Y. A Novel Deep-Blue Fluorescent Emitter Employed as an Identical Exciplex Acceptor for Solution-Processed Multi-Color OLEDs. J. Mater. Chem. C 2025, 13, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tan, X.; Volyniuk, D.; Matulaitis, T.; Keruckas, J.; Ivaniuk, K.; Helzhynskyy, I.; Stakhira, P.; Grazulevicius, J.V. High Triplet Energy Materials for Efficient Exciplex-Based and Full-TADF-Based White OLEDs. Dyes Pigments 2020, 177, 108259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, T.; Zhao, B.; Chu, B.; Li, W.; Su, Z.; Yan, X.; Liu, C.; Wu, H.; Jin, F.; Gao, Y. Efficient Exciplex Emission from Intramolecular Charge Transfer Material. Org. Electron. 2015, 25, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nguyen, T.B.; Nakanotani, H.; Hatakeyama, T.; Adachi, C. The Role of Reverse Intersystem Crossing Using a TADF-Type Acceptor Molecule on the Device Stability of Exciplex-Based Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1906614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jeon, S.K.; Lee, J.Y. Highly Efficient Exciplex Organic Light-Emitting Diodes by Exciplex Dispersion in the Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Host. Org. Electron. 2020, 76, 105477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, W.; Liu, D.; Shen, F.; Ma, D.; Wang, Z.; Feng, T.; Xu, Y.; Yang, B.; Ma, Y. A Twisting Donor-Acceptor Molecule with an Intercrossed Excited State for Highly Efficient, Deep-Blue Electroluminescence. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2797–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, S.; Li, W.; Yao, L.; Pan, Y.; Shen, F.; Xiao, R.; Yang, B.; Ma, Y. Enhanced Proportion of Radiative Excitons in Non-Doped Electro-Fluorescence Generated from an Imidazole Derivative with an Orthogonal Donor–Acceptor Structure. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 11302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, B.; Yuan, Y.; He, D.; Huang, D.; Luo, C.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, F.; Tong, Q.; Lee, C. High-Performance Blue OLEDs Based on Phenanthroimidazole Emitters via Substitutions at the C6- and C9-Positions for Improving Exciton Utilization. Chem. A Eur. J 2016, 22, 12130–12137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shi, J.; Cui, W.; Yu, Y.; Lv, X.; Xu, L.; Lang, W.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, S.; Yang, W. Highly Efficient Nondoped Blue Electroluminescence with an EQE Greater than 6.0% Based on a Phenothiazine Donor with Hybridized Local and Charge-Transfer Excited State. Dyes Pigments 2020, 172, 107860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fu, C.; Luo, S.; Li, Z.; Ai, X.; Pang, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, K.; Zhou, L.; Li, F.; Huang, Y.; et al. Highly Efficient Deep-Blue OLEDs Based on Hybridized Local and Charge-Transfer Emitters Bearing Pyrene as the Structural Unit. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 6317–6320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, D.; Duan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Hu, N.; Wang, X.; Sun, F.; Duan, Y. Application of Exciplex in the Fabrication of White Organic Light Emitting Devices with Mixed Fluorescent and Phosphorescent Layers. J. Lumin. 2015, 166, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Feng, D.; Dong, D.; Lian, L.; Wang, H.; He, G. High Efficiency Non-Doped White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Blue Exciplex Emission. Org. Electron. 2018, 56, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhao, C.; Yan, D.; Ahamad, T.; Alshehri, S.M.; Ma, D. High Efficiency and Low Roll-off Hybrid White Organic Light Emitting Diodes by Strategically Introducing Multi-Ultrathin Phosphorescent Layers in Blue Exciplex Emitter. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 045501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yao, J.; Ying, S.; Qiao, X.; Yang, D.; Chen, J.; Ahamad, T.; Alshehri, S.M.; Ma, D. High Efficiency and Low Roll-off All Fluorescence White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes by the Formation of Interface Exciplex. Org. Electron. 2019, 67, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, D.; Wang, Z.; Wang, D.; Wu, Y.-C.; Lo, C.-C.; Lien, A.; Cao, Y.; Su, S.-J. Efficient Exciplex Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with a Bipolar Acceptor. Org. Electron. 2015, 25, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, E.; Chen, C.; Zhao, W.; Yan, D.; Tang, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, P.; Sheng, R. Highly Efficient Fluorescent and Hybrid White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on a Bimolecular Excited System. Opt. Lett. 2023, 48, 5771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Y.; Lee, J.; Forrest, S.R. Tenfold Increase in the Lifetime of Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, C.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, D.; Duan, L. A π–D and π–A Exciplex-Forming Host for High-Efficiency and Long-Lifetime Single-Emissive-Layer Fluorescent White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yi, R.-H.; Chen, Y.-S.; Luo, D.; Chen, H.; Liu, S.-W.; Wong, K.-T. Exciplex-Forming Co-Host Systems Featuring Highly Twisted Bis-(N-Carbazolyl)Benzene-Based Donors for High-Efficiency Orange OLEDs. J. Mater. Chem. C 2024, 12, 18363–18373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ban, X.; Sun, K.; Sun, Y.; Huang, B.; Ye, S.; Yang, M.; Jiang, W. High Power Efficiency Solution-Processed Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Using Exciplex-Type Host with a Turn-on Voltage Approaching the Theoretical Limit. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25129–25138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ying, S.; Sun, Q.; Dai, Y.; Yang, D.; Qiao, X.; Ma, D. Precise Regulation of the Emissive Layer for Ultra-High Performance White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes in an Exciplex Forming Co-Host System. Mater. Chem. Front. 2019, 3, 640–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhang, T.; Li, A.; Sheng, R.; Sun, M.; Chen, P. Highly Efficient Single-Layer Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Co-Host Structure. Materials 2020, 13, 2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jung, M.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, T. A Bipolar Host Based High Triplet Energy Electroplex for an over 10 000 h Lifetime in Pure Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Maheshwaran, A.; Sree, V.G.; Park, H.; Kim, H.; Han, S.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Jin, S. High Efficiency Deep-Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with CIE x, y (≤0.15) and Low Efficiency Roll-Off by Employing a High Triplet Energy Bipolar Host Material. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Huh, J.; Sung, M.J.; Kwon, S.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J. Highly Efficient Deep Blue Phosphorescent OLEDs Based on Tetradentate Pt(II) Complexes Containing Adamantyl Spacer Groups. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2100967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shin, H.; Lee, S.; Kim, K.; Moon, C.; Yoo, S.; Lee, J.; Kim, J. Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Using an Exciplex Forming Co-host with the External Quantum Efficiency of Theoretical Limit. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4730–4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hu, J.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, X.; Cao, X.; Wu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, D.; Tao, Y.; Huang, W. Isomeric N-Linked Benzoimidazole Containing New Electron Acceptors for Exciplex Forming Hosts in Highly Efficient Blue Phosphorescent OLEDs. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1700036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Song, W.; Lee, H.L.; Lee, J.Y. High Triplet Energy Exciplex Host for Deep Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 5923–5929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shin, S.K.; Han, S.H.; Lee, J.Y. High Triplet Energy Exciplex Host Derived from a CN Modified Carbazole Based N-Type Host for Improved Efficiency and Lifetime in Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 10308–10314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sheng, R.; Li, A.; Zhang, F.; Song, J.; Duan, Y.; Chen, P. Highly Efficient, Simplified Monochrome and White Organic Light-Emitting Devices Based on Novel Exciplex Host. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 1901247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, T.; Yao, J.; Zhang, S.; Xiao, S.; Liu, W.; Wu, Z.; Ma, D. Highly Efficient and Low Efficiency Roll-off Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with Double-Exciplex Forming Co-Hosts. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 6062–6067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vasilopoulou, M.; Yusoff, A.R.b.M.; Daboczi, M.; Conforto, J.; Gavim, A.E.X.; da Silva, W.J.; Macedo, A.G.; Soultati, A.; Pistolis, G.; Schneider, F.K.; et al. High Efficiency Blue Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with below-Bandgap Electroluminescence. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Hang, X.; Fleetham, T.; Turner, E.; Brooks, J.; Li, J. Highly Efficient Blue-Emitting Cyclometalated Platinum(II) Complexes by Judicious Molecular Design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 6753–6756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sun, J.; Ahn, H.; Kang, S.; Ko, S.-B.; Song, D.; Um, H.A.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y.; Jeon, P.; Hwang, S.-H.; et al. Exceptionally Stable Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Nat. Photon. 2022, 16, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, G.; Ameri, L.; Dorame, B.; Zhu, Z.; Li, J. Improved Operational Stability of Blue Phosphorescent OLEDs by Functionalizing Phenyl-Carbene Groups of Tetradentate Pt(II) Complexes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2405066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Muruganantham, S.; Jung, Y.H.; Kim, H.R.; Ham, J.H.; Braveenth, R.; Naveen, K.R.; Chae, M.Y.; Kwon, J.H. Unveiling a Pyridine-Based Exciplex Host for Efficient Stable Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. J. Mater. Chem. C 2025, 13, 2923–2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Qiao, X.; Alshehri, S.M.; Ahamad, T.; Ma, D. Simple-Structured Phosphorescent Warm White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with High Power Efficiency and Low Efficiency Roll-Off. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10093–10097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tyan, Y.-S. Organic Light-Emitting-Diode Lighting Overview. J. Photon. Energy 2011, 1, 011009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, S.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Huang, C.; Sun, Q.; Liang, J.; Liao, L.; Fung, M. White Organic LED with a Luminous Efficacy Exceeding 100 Lm W−1 without Light Out-Coupling Enhancement Techniques. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1701314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tian, Q.-S.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Y.; Yuan, S.; Wang, Q.; Liao, L.-S. High-Performance White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes with Simplified Structure Incorporating Novel Exciplex-Forming Host. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 39116–39123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sheng, R.; Zhang, E.; Zhao, W.; Chen, C.; Ma, W.; Shao, J.; Duan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, P. Engineering of Interface Exciplex System for Highly Efficient White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Single-Emission-Layer Architecture. Org. Electron. 2022, 100, 106382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, Z.-Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.-J.; Fan, J.; Xie, Y.-M.; Fung, M.-K. Ultra-High-Efficiency White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Based on TADF Material Incorporated Efficient Exciplex Hosts. Org. Electron. 2025, 139, 107196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sheng, R.; Yang, L.; Li, A.; Chen, K.; Zhang, F.; Duan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, P. Highly Efficient Orange and White OLEDs Based on Ultrathin Phosphorescent Emitters with Double Reverse Intersystem Crossing System. J. Lumin. 2022, 246, 118852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, D.; Yang, G.; Chen, Z.; Xie, W.; Li, D.; Li, W.; Lin, J.; Nie, X.; Li, Z.; Liang, B.; et al. Highly Horizontal Oriented Tricomponent Exciplex Host with Multiple Reverse Intersystem Crossing Channels for High-Performance Narrowband Electroluminescence and Eye-Protection White Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2403584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mechanism diagrams of (a) the exciplex composite as an emitter and (b) as a host.
Figure 1. Mechanism diagrams of (a) the exciplex composite as an emitter and (b) as a host.
Molecules 30 01556 g001
Figure 2. The chemical structures of all donors and acceptors of the exciplexes mentioned in this review and their HOMO/LUMO levels.
Figure 2. The chemical structures of all donors and acceptors of the exciplexes mentioned in this review and their HOMO/LUMO levels.
Molecules 30 01556 g002
Figure 3. (a) Energy-level diagram of the NPB: TPBi exciplex; (b) schematic diagram of the TTF mechanism proposed by Jankus et al. [35].
Figure 3. (a) Energy-level diagram of the NPB: TPBi exciplex; (b) schematic diagram of the TTF mechanism proposed by Jankus et al. [35].
Molecules 30 01556 g003
Figure 4. (a) Current density−voltage−luminance (J-V-L) characteristics and (b) external quantum efficiency−luminance−power efficiency (EQE-L-PE) characteristics of the mCP:PO-T2T exciplex (blue curve) reported by Hung et al. [40].
Figure 4. (a) Current density−voltage−luminance (J-V-L) characteristics and (b) external quantum efficiency−luminance−power efficiency (EQE-L-PE) characteristics of the mCP:PO-T2T exciplex (blue curve) reported by Hung et al. [40].
Molecules 30 01556 g004
Figure 5. Synthetic scheme of CzTrz [43].
Figure 5. Synthetic scheme of CzTrz [43].
Molecules 30 01556 g005
Figure 6. (a) Current density−voltage−luminance (J-V-L) characteristics, (b) EQE and PE as a function of luminance, (c) EL spectra, (d) device structure of blue exciplex devices using CPTBF and CPF as donor [44].
Figure 6. (a) Current density−voltage−luminance (J-V-L) characteristics, (b) EQE and PE as a function of luminance, (c) EL spectra, (d) device structure of blue exciplex devices using CPTBF and CPF as donor [44].
Molecules 30 01556 g006
Figure 7. Synthetic route and chemical structure of TPAPB [45].
Figure 7. Synthetic route and chemical structure of TPAPB [45].
Molecules 30 01556 g007
Figure 8. (a) Energy-level diagram of OLEDs using BFPD: TAPC as the emitting layer. (b) Current density−voltage (J-V) characteristics of the OLED devices. (c) PL spectra for 10 wt% and 50 wt% BFPD: TAPC films and EL spectra for devices A and C. (d) External electroluminescence quantum efficiency of the OLEDs as a function of current density [46].
Figure 8. (a) Energy-level diagram of OLEDs using BFPD: TAPC as the emitting layer. (b) Current density−voltage (J-V) characteristics of the OLED devices. (c) PL spectra for 10 wt% and 50 wt% BFPD: TAPC films and EL spectra for devices A and C. (d) External electroluminescence quantum efficiency of the OLEDs as a function of current density [46].
Molecules 30 01556 g008
Figure 9. (a) The EL spectra of the 8 wt% HAP-3FDPA: mCP exciplex−based OLED at various current densities. (b) The deep-blue CIE coordinates of (0.16, 0.12) for EL spectra. (c) The current efficiency−voltage−luminance (J-V-L) characteristics. (d) EQE as a function of current density [24].
Figure 9. (a) The EL spectra of the 8 wt% HAP-3FDPA: mCP exciplex−based OLED at various current densities. (b) The deep-blue CIE coordinates of (0.16, 0.12) for EL spectra. (c) The current efficiency−voltage−luminance (J-V-L) characteristics. (d) EQE as a function of current density [24].
Molecules 30 01556 g009
Figure 10. Synthetic routes for compounds P1–P6 [53].
Figure 10. Synthetic routes for compounds P1–P6 [53].
Molecules 30 01556 g010
Figure 11. (a) EQE and CE−current density characteristics of device B, W21, W22, W23, and W24. Inset: the schematic energy level diagram of the devices. (b) Current density−voltage characteristics of the devices [63].
Figure 11. (a) EQE and CE−current density characteristics of device B, W21, W22, W23, and W24. Inset: the schematic energy level diagram of the devices. (b) Current density−voltage characteristics of the devices [63].
Molecules 30 01556 g011
Figure 12. (a) External quantum efficiency versus luminance characteristics. (b) Current efficiency and power efficiency versus luminance characteristics [65].
Figure 12. (a) External quantum efficiency versus luminance characteristics. (b) Current efficiency and power efficiency versus luminance characteristics [65].
Molecules 30 01556 g012
Figure 13. (a) Schematic diagram of the device structure and energy levels of the consisting layers by Kim et al. (b) J-V-L characteristics of the OLEDs according to the thickness of ETL. Inset: scatters = emission patterns of the EL intensity, solid line = Lambertian emission pattern. (c) EQE and power efficiency of the OLEDs. Inset is the normalized PL and EL intensity of ETL 55 nm device at 1000 nit. (d) Calculated EQEs as a function of the thickness of an ETL with experimentally measured maximum EQEs (circles) [77].
Figure 13. (a) Schematic diagram of the device structure and energy levels of the consisting layers by Kim et al. (b) J-V-L characteristics of the OLEDs according to the thickness of ETL. Inset: scatters = emission patterns of the EL intensity, solid line = Lambertian emission pattern. (c) EQE and power efficiency of the OLEDs. Inset is the normalized PL and EL intensity of ETL 55 nm device at 1000 nit. (d) Calculated EQEs as a function of the thickness of an ETL with experimentally measured maximum EQEs (circles) [77].
Molecules 30 01556 g013
Figure 14. Chemical structure of TPBI and synthetic routes for the N-linked iTPyBIB, iTPBIPy, and iTPyBIPy [78].
Figure 14. Chemical structure of TPBI and synthetic routes for the N-linked iTPyBIB, iTPBIPy, and iTPyBIPy [78].
Molecules 30 01556 g014
Figure 15. (a) Device structure of the white OLED. (b) Luminous efficacy–current efficiency–brightness characteristics. The inset is the image of the corresponding white OLED. (c) Current density–voltage−brightness characteristics. (d) External quantum efficiency−current density curve. The green solid line is the measured data, while the two blue dashed lines are the EQE fitted upon considering TTA and SPA models [90].
Figure 15. (a) Device structure of the white OLED. (b) Luminous efficacy–current efficiency–brightness characteristics. The inset is the image of the corresponding white OLED. (c) Current density–voltage−brightness characteristics. (d) External quantum efficiency−current density curve. The green solid line is the measured data, while the two blue dashed lines are the EQE fitted upon considering TTA and SPA models [90].
Molecules 30 01556 g015
Figure 16. (a) The structure of the WOLEDs. (b) The current density−voltage−luminance characteristics of devices W1–W3 [92].
Figure 16. (a) The structure of the WOLEDs. (b) The current density−voltage−luminance characteristics of devices W1–W3 [92].
Molecules 30 01556 g016
Figure 17. (a) The energy levels of HOMO, LUMO, S1, and T1 of SFBCz, SFTRZ, and exciplex. (b) The fluorescence and phosphorescence spectra of SFBCz and SFTRZ. (c) The fluorescence and phosphorescence spectra of the exciplex-forming host. (d) The PL decay curve of the exciplex-forming host recorded at the emission peak [69].
Figure 17. (a) The energy levels of HOMO, LUMO, S1, and T1 of SFBCz, SFTRZ, and exciplex. (b) The fluorescence and phosphorescence spectra of SFBCz and SFTRZ. (c) The fluorescence and phosphorescence spectra of the exciplex-forming host. (d) The PL decay curve of the exciplex-forming host recorded at the emission peak [69].
Molecules 30 01556 g017
Figure 18. Proposed formation of the dual exciplexes (The blue and red circles represent the holes and electrons forming bulk exciplexes, respectively, while the green and pink circles represent the holes and electrons forming interface exciplexes, respectively.) [33].
Figure 18. Proposed formation of the dual exciplexes (The blue and red circles represent the holes and electrons forming bulk exciplexes, respectively, while the green and pink circles represent the holes and electrons forming interface exciplexes, respectively.) [33].
Molecules 30 01556 g018
Figure 19. (a) Energy level diagram, (b) CE/ PE/ EQE−Luminance (CE/ PE/ EQE−L), (c) current density−voltage−luminance (J−V−L) characteristics, and (d) EL spectra of the devices based on ternary exciplexes p35P35D30 and p50P20D30 as EML [95].
Figure 19. (a) Energy level diagram, (b) CE/ PE/ EQE−Luminance (CE/ PE/ EQE−L), (c) current density−voltage−luminance (J−V−L) characteristics, and (d) EL spectra of the devices based on ternary exciplexes p35P35D30 and p50P20D30 as EML [95].
Molecules 30 01556 g019
Table 1. Performance summary of blue exciplexes as emitters in blue OLEDs.
Table 1. Performance summary of blue exciplexes as emitters in blue OLEDs.
Exciplex System (EML)EQE (%)PE (lm/W)CE (cd/A)λEL (nm)λPL (nm)Von (V)FWHM (nm)CIE CoordinateS1/T1
(eV)
TypeRef
NPB:TPBi3.72.62.8450-2.5-(0.15, 0.13)2.85/2.80Exciplex[35]
TCTA:B3PYMPM10.0--4954842.8---/-Exciplex[39]
mCP:PO-T2T8.018.415.54714732.0-(0.17, 0.23)-/-Exciplex[40]
NPB:DPTPCz0.61.21.4491--83(0.25, 0.41)-/-Exciplex[28]
CDBP:PO-T2T13.027.826.6-4762.577(0.17, 0.29)2.89/2.86Exciplex[34]
mCBP:PO-T2T7.6617.7815.08-473--(0.17, 0.23)-/-Exciplex[41]
CzSi:PO-T2T6.17.08.9465-3.0-(0.16, 0.21)-/-Exciplex[42]
mCP:PO-T2T16.026.427.0480-3.0-(0.16, 0.28)-/-Exciplex[42]
mCPPO1:PO-T2T6.58.09.4480-3.0-(0.18, 0.29)-/-Exciplex[42]
TCTA:CzTrz12.6227.48-490--85(0.27, 0.53)2.85/2.85Exciplex[43]
CPF:PO-T2T9.522.921.9- 2.2-(0.17, 0.29)-/-Exciplex[44]
CPTBF:PO-T2T12.533.227.5- 2.2-(0.18, 0.31)-/-Exciplex[44]
TPAPB:TPBi7.09.17.24684713.2-(0.14, 0.18)2.66/2.61Exciplex[45]
TAPC:10% BFPD7.8-21.75084884.6--2.88/2.84Exciplex[46]
CN-Cz2:PO-T2T16.047.537.8480-2.3-(0.20, 0.40)-Exciplex[47]
mCP:24iPBIOXD0.650.660.8--3.8-(0.19, 0.20)-/-Exciplex[48]
mCP: iTPBIOXD0.630.740.9--3.8-(0.20, 0.23)-/-Exciplex[48]
mCP:8% HAP-3FDPA10.2--4374334.087(0.16, 0.12)-/-Exciplex[24]
26DCzPPy:TB-3tBuCz14.63.16.6425-6.546(0.158, 0.052)3.07/3.07Exciplex[50]
mCBP:DNPhB4.832.23.044444443.7-(0.152, 0.075)3.27/3.25Exciplex[22]
NPB:TAZ-0.360.75440 3.663--/-Exciplex[51]
TCTA:BOBTFB3.49-4.84694782.878(0.15, 0.18)2.92/2.78Exciplex[52]
P6:TCTA9.1--433-6.0101-122-2.93/2.92Exciplex[53]
DMAC-DPS:T2T4.44--480480--(0.20, 0.37)-/-Exciplex[54]
DMAC-DPS: B4PyMPm4.40--493493--(0.24, 0.42)-/-Exciplex[54]
TrisPCz:BCz-TRZ11.933.033.6-4993.2-(0.26, 0.50)-/-Exciplex[55]
DMAC-DPS:1% PO-T2T15.3-22.04804906.9-(0.20, 0.41)-/-Exciplex[56]
TPA-PPI5.026.135.66434440--(0.15, 0.11)-/-Hot Exciton Materials[57]
TPMCN2.181.962.694634453.5-(0.15, 0.18)-/-Hot Exciton Materials[58]
Py-BPA-BPI5.6410.510.94714692.15-(0.17, 0.29)-/-Hot Exciton Materials[59]
TPEPO6.6210.915.864844904.0---/-Hot Exciton Materials[60]
TPP-TXO210.5-11.1-4373.1-(0.152, 0.065)-/-Hot Exciton Materials[61]
Table 2. Performance summary of blue exciplexes as emitters in WOLEDs.
Table 2. Performance summary of blue exciplexes as emitters in WOLEDs.
Exciplex System (EML)EQE (%)PE (lm/W)CE (cd/A)Von (V)Ref
TCTA:Bphen+ PO-014.39.033.63.0[62]
CDBP:PO-T2T (WOLED)25.584.167.02.5[34]
CDBP:PO-T2T + TBRb11.221.427.2-[63]
CDBP:PO-T2T + PO-0120.475.962.8-[64]
mCP:PO-T2T + TAPC:PO-T2T7.9211.316.2-[5]
26DCzPPy:PO-T2T + TBRb10.135.932.62.8[65]
TAPC:26DCzPPY1.13-2.19-[66]
TAPC:TPBi + m-MTDATA:TPBi-11.811.32.76[67]
Table 3. Performance summary of blue exciplexes as hosts in OLEDs.
Table 3. Performance summary of blue exciplexes as hosts in OLEDs.
Exciplex System (EML)EQE (%)PE (lm/W)CE (cd/A)λEL (nm)Von (V)TypeRef
mCP:B3PYMPM:FIrpic29.555.462.2-3.0Sky-Blue Host[77]
mCP:iTPyBIPy:FIrpic19.336.938.5-3.2Sky-Blue Host[78]
t-DCDPA:DBFTrz:FCNIr16.4-25.2--Deep-Blue Host[79]
mCP:BM-A10:FCNIr24.026.0-4552.9Deep-Blue Host[13]
oCBP:CNmCBPCN18.830.332.8420-Deep-Blue Host[80]
mCP:B4PyPPM:FIrpic20.147.440.74702.6Sky-Blue Host[81]
mCBP:SiCzTrz:Ir(cb)327.6--471-Pure-Blue Host[74]
mCBP:PO-T2T + mCBP:B4PyPPM:FIrpic25.6154.3145.77470-Sky-Blue Host[82]
DBFPO:TSPO1+TDBA-DI41.287.272.24582.5Deep-Blue Host[83]
SiCzCz:SiTrzCz2:BD-0225.425.030.4-2.8Deep-Blue Host[85]
SiBCz:SiTrzCz2:PtON5N-dtb20.4--4702.7Deep-Blue Host[86]
oCBP:CNCzPyDFCN+CN–Ir29.2-46.84632.7Blue Host[87]
oCBP:CNDFPyCzCN+ CN–Ir26.6-44.04632.7Blue Host[87]
mCP:B3PYMPM:FIrpic + PO-0120.075.364.5-2.4WOLED Host[88]
mCP:B4PyMPM:FIrpic + PO-0128.1105.083.6--WOLED Host[90]
mCP:B4PyPPM:FIrpic + PO-0121.773.666.4-2.5WOLED Host[81]
26DCzPPy:B4PyMPM:FIrpic + PO-0127.389.079.0-2.7WOLED Host[91]
26DCzPPy/B4PyPPM:FIrpic + PO-0123.1101.981.1-2.4WOLED Host[92]
Trz-PhCz:B4PyMPM + mCBP:B4PyMPM36.9137.4--2.2WOLED Host[93]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, D.; Zhang, M.; Wang, J.; Jing, X.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, L.; Sheng, R.; Chen, P. Blue Exciplexes in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes: Opportunities and Challenges. Molecules 2025, 30, 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071556

AMA Style

Yan D, Zhang M, Wang J, Jing X, Sun J, Zhang Y, Yang L, Sheng R, Chen P. Blue Exciplexes in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes: Opportunities and Challenges. Molecules. 2025; 30(7):1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Duxu, Mengmeng Zhang, Jintao Wang, Xiaoqing Jing, Jun Sun, Yongan Zhang, Liping Yang, Ren Sheng, and Ping Chen. 2025. "Blue Exciplexes in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes: Opportunities and Challenges" Molecules 30, no. 7: 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071556

APA Style

Yan, D., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jing, X., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, L., Sheng, R., & Chen, P. (2025). Blue Exciplexes in Organic Light-Emitting Diodes: Opportunities and Challenges. Molecules, 30(7), 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071556

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop