Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
IJMSInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

3 November 2019

The Blood–Brain Barrier and Its Intercellular Junctions in Age-Related Brain Disorders

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Institute of Life Sciences, Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad, 310414 Arad, Romania
2
Institute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
3
Doctoral School of Biology, University of Szeged, 6726 Szeged, Hungary
4
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
This article belongs to the Special Issue The Tight Junction and Its Proteins: More Than Just a Barrier

Abstract

With age, our cognitive skills and abilities decline. Maybe starting as an annoyance, this decline can become a major impediment to normal daily life. Recent research shows that the neurodegenerative disorders responsible for age associated cognitive dysfunction are mechanistically linked to the state of the microvasculature in the brain. When the microvasculature does not function properly, ischemia, hypoxia, oxidative stress and related pathologic processes ensue, further damaging vascular and neural function. One of the most important and specialized functions of the brain microvasculature is the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which controls the movement of molecules between blood circulation and the brain parenchyma. In this review, we are focusing on tight junctions (TJs), the multiprotein complexes that play an important role in establishing and maintaining barrier function. After a short introduction of the cell types that modulate barrier function via intercellular communication, we examine how age, age related pathologies and the aging of the immune system affects TJs. Then, we review how the TJs are affected in age associated neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Lastly, we summarize the TJ aspects of Huntington’s disease and schizophrenia. Barrier dysfunction appears to be a common denominator in neurological disorders, warranting detailed research into the molecular mechanisms behind it. Learning the commonalities and differences in the pathomechanism of the BBB injury in different neurological disorders will predictably lead to development of new therapeutics that improve our life as we age.

1. Introduction

Aging and age-related co-morbidities are rapidly increasing unresolved health and socio-economic problems in developed countries. Decline of cognitive brain functions represents one of the main health challenges of aging and includes vascular and neurodegenerative dementias such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease.
The functional state of the central nervous system (CNS) is greatly dependent on the quality of the vasculature. As the centuries old saying goes: “A man is as old as his arteries”. Today, especially for the brain, this concept should be redefined: You are as old as your microvessels and capillaries [1]. There is increasing evidence that the cerebral microvasculature and the neurovascular unit play a critical role in age-related brain dysfunctions. The multitude of brain microvascular changes accompanied by aging includes endothelial dysfunction, blood–brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, decrease in blood flow, microhemorrhages, vessel rarefication and neurovascular uncoupling. In this review, our main focus is the breakdown of the paracellular barrier and tight junctions.

2. Cells of the Neurovascular Unit (NVU)

The vasculature in the brain forms a functional unit with the surrounding neural tissue, thus the term neurovascular unit was coined [2]. A functionally intact neurovascular unit (NVU) is a prerequisite for the proper function of the CNS. The most important cellular components of the NVU are cerebral endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytic endfeet and neurons; however, other cellular elements like microglia may also play a modulatory role. The main role of the NVU besides neurovascular coupling is the formation of the BBB.
Cerebral endothelial cells (CECs) lining brain capillaries are considered the principal barrier forming endothelial cells. They are interconnected by a continuous line of tight junctions and characterized by a high number of mitochondria and low number of caveolae [3,4,5]. These characteristics contribute to the formation of a paracellular and transcellular barrier.
Pericytes are localized in the duplication of the basement membrane covering the basal surface of the endothelium. The estimates of pericyte coverage show large variations in the literature [6,7]. Pericytes can secrete a large number of substances that may influence endothelial function including TGFβ, angiopoetin-1 or VEGF. It seems that the differentiation stage of pericytes determines their effect on the endothelium as well [8]. The role of pericytes in the formation of the BBB is supported by the finding that absence of pericytes leads to endothelial hyperplasia, abnormal vasculogenesis and an increased BBB permeability [9,10].
Although the role of astrocytes in the formation of the physical barrier is limited, due to their influence on cerebral endothelial cells they play an important role in the maintenance of the BBB [11]. The astrocytic endfeet ensheath the brain vasculature almost completely [12] and express the water channel protein, aquaporin 4, which is suggested to play a crucial role in creating a bulk flow in the brain parenchyma from arterioles towards venules. This flow was shown to contribute to the clearance of extracellular proteins and metabolic waste products through the newly rediscovered glymphatic system [13,14]. Despite much interest in the glymphatic system, some experimental results do not support or even contradict its function [15]. Thus further refining of the glymphatic hypothesis is likely necessary [16]. Nevertheless, the aquaporin 4 in astrocytic endfeet is indispensable to BBB function as its knockout results in altered brain microvasculature and decreased water exchange through the BBB [17], furthermore its subcellular distribution shows an age dependent depolarization accompanied by decreased protein clearance [18].
The BBB is in the forefront of the defense line of the CNS and restricts the free movement of solutes and cellular elements between the systemic circulation and neuronal tissue. The BBB is involved in the pathogenesis of a large number of CNS disorders [19].
Cell types comprising the NVU are in close communication in order to maintain physiologic function and react to pathologies. Ligand-receptor type intercellular interactions and ion channels were described early as pathways that coordinate the function of the cell types constituting the NVU [20]. An example of bidirectional information exchange is the role of CD146 in coordinating the development of pericyte coverage on brain vasculature during early ontogenesis. At first CD146 is expressed by endothelial cells but as pericyte coverage increases, CD146 expression shifts to pericytes where it acts as a co-receptor of PDGFRβ. Endothelia attached pericytes down-regulate endothelial CD146 via TGFβ1 secretion, promoting BBB maturation [21]. Recently a growing body of evidence suggests that extracellular vesicle—mainly exosome—mediated bidirectional communication coordinates key functions of the NVU at the local and systemic level as well [22,23,24,25]. In a mouse model of spinal cord injury, pericyte-derived exosomes improved microcirculation and protected barrier function [26]. In response to traumatic brain injury, the loss of pericytes and consequent impairment of crosstalk among NVU cells causes barrier dysfunction, brain edema and leakage of cerebral vasculature. A recent example of pericyte to endothelial cell communication in the retina is the circular RNA cPWWP2A that is synthesized in pericytes and downregulates angiopoietin 1, occludin and sirtuin-1expression in endothelial cells by sequestering miRNA-579 [27].

3. Brain Capillaries in Aging

With aging, the density of brain vasculature is decreased and cerebrovascular dysfunction appears to precede and accompany cognitive dysfunction and neurodegeneration. Cerebrovascular angiogenesis is decreased and cerebral blood flow is inhibited by anomalous blood vessels such as tortuous arterioles and thick collagen deposits in the walls of veins and venules [28].
In most mammals, the capacity of CECs to divide is limited and endothelial cells are prone to be senescent. Aging is associated with endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffening and remodeling, impaired angiogenesis, defective vascular repair and with an increasing prevalence of atherosclerosis [29]. In the aging brain cerebral blood flow declines and perfusion pressure either is constant or increases. In Brown-Norway and Fisher 344/Brown-Norway rats that maintain a relatively consistent cortical volume throughout life the densities of arterioles and arteriole-to-arteriole anastomoses on the cortical surface was found to be decreased with age [30]. In a spontaneously hypertensive rat model, long term hypertension was found to gradually destroy BBB, resulting in white matter lesions, one of the most important pathological changes in vascular dementia [31]. At the capillary level, increased capillary diameters and decreased capillary density paired with increased red blood cell velocities were observed [28,32]. Some capillary density measurements in humans contradict these observations, as no changes were observed in the intervascular distance on CD31 stained brain sections [33].

5. Closing Remarks

Aging comes with the deterioration of all bodily functions of which the loss of cognitive function is possibly the most serious in our heavily information dependent society. With the building evidence that dysfunction of the microvasculature is not just coincident but is part of the underlying mechanisms of aging and associated neurovascular and neurological disorders, new therapeutic possibilities are opened. The significant heterogeneity of BBB disruption data in studies using aging postmortem brain tissue suggests that more data is necessary to clearly understand the role of BBB disruption and to see whether it is a symptom or a cause [48]. It is not surprising that human BBB data before the mid-1990s is mainly regarding permeability; however, even since the discovery of occludin, zonula occludens proteins and claudins, BBB TJ data in the aging brain is scarce and this deficit is just partly made up for by data from aging associated disorders. Furthermore many studies disregard that claudin 5, occludin or ZO1 does not constitute the paracellular barrier by itself and all three should be studied along with permeability to different molecular size tracers at the same time to get a picture of barrier status. Worsening the situation is that the reliability of existing TJ data has been questioned recently [35]. Thus further comprehensive BBB TJ and permeability studies are needed in the field of aging and aging associated disorders. Another focus needs to be the study of both classical and novel intercellular communication pathways between brain capillary endothelium, pericytes, astrocytes, microglia and neurons as the concerted activity of all these cell types is necessary for proper neural function. We are just beginning to understand the depth and mechanisms of intercellular information exchange that makes the NVU a functional unit. The knowledge of how the interdependent functions of the cell types constituting the NVU are affected by the process of aging can lead to the alleviation of age related impairments and a better quality of life.

Author Contributions

All authors participated in researching and discussing literature and writing parts of the manuscripts. L.C., I.A.K. and A.E.F. wrote the paper with input from all authors. All authors approved the final version.

Funding

A.E.F. is supported by the János Bolyai Research Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (BO/00023/17/8) and the New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities (UNKP-19-4-SZTE-43). Work of I.A.K. is supported by the NKFIH (grant numbers: K-116158, GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00020 and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-0034) and by the UEFISCDI PNCDI III—PCE 2016 Program (project number: PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0408, 188/2017). Work of I.W. is supported by the NKFIH FK-124114 and the UEFISCDI PN-III-P1–1.1-TE-2016–1352 projects.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

BBBblood–brain barrier
TJtight-junction
CNScentral nervous system
NVUneurovascular unit
CECCerebral endothelial cells
ZO-1zonula occludens 1 protein
MCAOmiddle cerebral artery occlusion
amyloid-beta protein
Aβ1-42amyloid-beta peptide containing amino acids 1-42
ADAlzheimer’s disease
MMPmatrix metalloproteinase
PDParkinson’s disease
HDHuntington’s disease

References

  1. Wilhelm, I.; Nyúl-Tóth, Á.; Kozma, M.; Farkas, A.E.; Krizbai, I.A. Role of pattern recognition receptors of the neurovascular unit in inflamm-aging. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2017, 313, H1000–H1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Iadecola, C. The Neurovascular Unit Coming of Age: A Journey through Neurovascular Coupling in Health and Disease. Neuron 2017, 96, 17–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brightman, M.W.; Reese, T.S. Junctions between intimately apposed cell membranes in the vertebrate brain. J. Cell Biol. 1969, 40, 648–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Oldendorf, W.H.; Cornford, M.E.; Brown, W.J. The large apparent work capability of the blood-brain barrier: A study of the mitochondrial content of capillary endothelial cells in brain and other tissues of the rat. Ann. Neurol. 1977, 1, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nag, S. Morphology and molecular properties of cellular components of normal cerebral vessels. Methods Mol. Med. 2003, 89, 3–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hill, J.; Rom, S.; Ramirez, S.H.; Persidsky, Y. Emerging roles of pericytes in the regulation of the neurovascular unit in health and disease. J. Neuroimmune Pharm. 2014, 9, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Winkler, E.A.; Sengillo, J.D.; Bell, R.D.; Wang, J.; Zlokovic, B.V. Blood-spinal cord barrier pericyte reductions contribute to increased capillary permeability. Br. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012, 32, 1841–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Thanabalasundaram, G.; Schneidewind, J.; Pieper, C.; Galla, H.J. The impact of pericytes on the blood-brain barrier integrity depends critically on the pericyte differentiation stage. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 43, 1284–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hellström, M.; Gerhardt, H.; Kalén, M.; Li, X.; Eriksson, U.; Wolburg, H.; Betsholtz, C. Lack of pericytes leads to endothelial hyperplasia and abnormal vascular morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Armulik, A.; Genové, G.; Mäe, M.; Nisancioglu, M.H.; Wallgard, E.; Niaudet, C.; He, L.; Norlin, J.; Lindblom, P.; Strittmatter, K.; et al. Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature 2010, 468, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abbott, N.J.; Rönnbäck, L.; Hansson, E. Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Delaney, C.; Campbell, M. The blood brain barrier: Insights from development and ageing. Tissue Barriers 2017, 5, e1373897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Verheggen, I.C.M.; Van Boxtel, M.P.J.; Verhey, F.R.J.; Jansen, J.F.A.; Backes, W.H. Interaction between blood-brain barrier and glymphatic system in solute clearance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 90, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Iliff, J.J.; Wang, M.; Liao, Y.; Plogg, B.A.; Peng, W.; Gundersen, G.A.; Benveniste, H.; Vates, G.E.; Deane, R.; Goldman, S.A.; et al. A paravascular pathway facilitates CSF flow through the brain parenchyma and the clearance of interstitial solutes, including amyloid beta. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 147ra111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Smith, A.J.; Verkman, A.S. The “glymphatic” mechanism for solute clearance in Alzheimer’s disease: Game changer or unproven speculation? FASEB J. 2018, 32, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abbott, N.J.; Pizzo, M.E.; Preston, J.E.; Janigro, D.; Thorne, R.G. The role of brain barriers in fluid movement in the CNS: Is there a ‘glymphatic’ system? Acta Neuropathol. 2018, 135, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Xu, K.; Liu, Y.; Erokwu, B.O.; Zhao, P.; Flask, C.A.; Ramos-Estebanez, C.; Farr, G.W.; LaManna, J.C.; Boron, W.F.; et al. Increased cerebral vascularization and decreased water exchange across the blood-brain barrier in aquaporin-4 knockout mice. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kress, B.T.; Iliff, J.J.; Xia, M.; Wang, M.; Wei, H.S.; Zeppenfeld, D.; Xie, L.; Kang, H.; Xu, Q.; Liew, J.A.; et al. Impairment of paravascular clearance pathways in the aging brain. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 76, 845–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Neuwelt, E.; Abbott, N.J.; Abrey, L.; Banks, W.A.; Blakley, B.; Davis, T.; Engelhardt, B.; Grammas, P.; Nedergaard, M.; Nutt, J.; et al. Strategies to advance translational research into brain barriers. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bhowmick, S.; D’Mello, V.; Caruso, D.; Wallerstein, A.; Abdul-Muneer, P.M. Impairment of pericyte-endothelium crosstalk leads to blood-brain barrier dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 2019, 317, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, J.; Luo, Y.; Hui, H.; Cai, T.; Huang, H.; Yang, F.; Feng, J.; Zhang, J.; Yan, X. CD146 coordinates brain endothelial cell-pericyte communication for blood-brain barrier development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E7622–E7631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zagrean, A.M.; Hermann, D.M.; Opris, I.; Zagrean, L.; Popa-Wagner, A. Multicellular Crosstalk Between Exosomes and the Neurovascular Unit After Cerebral Ischemia. Therapeutic Implications. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ramirez, S.H.; Andrews, A.M.; Paul, D.; Pachter, J.S. Extracellular vesicles: Mediators and biomarkers of pathology along CNS barriers. Fluids Barriers CNS 2018, 15, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. András, I.E.; Toborek, M. Extracellular vesicles of the blood-brain barrier. Tissue Barriers 2016, 4, e1131804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saeedi, S.; Israel, S.; Nagy, C.; Turecki, G. The emerging role of exosomes in mental disorders. Transl. Psychiatry 2019, 9, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuan, X.; Wu, Q.; Wang, P.; Jing, Y.; Yao, H.; Tang, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xiu, R. Exosomes Derived from Pericytes Improve Microcirculation and Protect Blood-Spinal Cord Barrier After Spinal Cord Injury in Mice. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, C.; Ge, H.M.; Liu, B.H.; Dong, R.; Shan, K.; Chen, X.; Yao, M.D.; Li, X.M.; Yao, J.; Zhou, R.M.; et al. Targeting pericyte-endothelial cell crosstalk by circular RNA-cPWWP2A inhibition aggravates diabetes-induced microvascular dysfunction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 7455–7464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, W.R.; Thore, C.R. Review: Cerebral microvascular pathology in ageing and neurodegeneration. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2011, 37, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Erusalimsky, J.D. Vascular endothelial senescence: From mechanisms to pathophysiology. J. Appl. Physiol. 2009, 106, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sonntag, W.E.; Lynch, C.D.; Cooney, P.T.; Hutchins, P.M. Decreases in cerebral microvasculature with age are associated with the decline in growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 3515–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, Y.; Yang, X.; Tao, Y.; Lan, L.; Zheng, L.; Sun, J. Tight junction disruption of blood-brain barrier in white matter lesions in chronic hypertensive rats. Neuroreport 2015, 26, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Desjardins, M.; Berti, R.; Lefebvre, J.; Dubeau, S.; Lesage, F. Aging-related differences in cerebral capillary blood flow in anesthetized rats. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1947–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Goodall, E.F.; Wang, C.; Simpson, J.E.; Baker, D.J.; Drew, D.R.; Heath, P.R.; Saffrey, M.J.; Romero, I.A.; Wharton, S.B. Age-associated changes in the blood-brain barrier: Comparative studies in human and mouse. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2018, 44, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nitta, T.; Hata, M.; Gotoh, S.; Seo, Y.; Sasaki, H.; Hashimoto, N.; Furuse, M.; Tsukita, S. Size-selective loosening of the blood-brain barrier in claudin-5–deficient mice. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Castro Dias, M.; Coisne, C.; Lazarevic, I.; Baden, P.; Hata, M.; Iwamoto, N.; Francisco, D.M.F.; Vanlandewijck, M.; He, L.; Baier, F.A.; et al. Claudin-3-deficient C57BL/6J mice display intact brain barriers. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Berndt, P.; Winkler, L.; Cording, J.; Breitkreuz-Korff, O.; Rex, A.; Dithmer, S.; Rausch, V.; Blasig, R.; Richter, M.; Sporbert, A.; et al. Tight junction proteins at the blood-brain barrier: Far more than claudin-5. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 1987–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dörfel, M.J.; Westphal, J.K.; Bellmann, C.; Krug, S.M.; Cording, J.; Mittag, S.; Tauber, R.; Fromm, M.; Blasig, I.E.; Huber, O. CK2-dependent phosphorylation of occludin regulates the interaction with ZO-proteins and tight junction integrity. Cell Commun. Signal. 2013, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Raleigh, D.R.; Boe, D.M.; Yu, D.; Weber, C.R.; Marchiando, A.M.; Bradford, E.M.; Wang, Y.; Wu, L.; Schneeberger, E.E.; Shen, L.; et al. Occludin S408 phosphorylation regulates tight junction protein interactions and barrier function. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 193, 565–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Runkle, E.A.; Sundstrom, J.M.; Runkle, K.B.; Liu, X.; Antonetti, D.A. Occludin localizes to centrosomes and modifies mitotic entry. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 30847–30858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Furuse, M.; Hirase, T.; Itoh, M.; Nagafuchi, A.; Yonemura, S.; Tsukita, S. Occludin: A novel integral membrane protein localizing at tight junctions. J. Cell Biol. 1993, 12 Pt 2, 1777–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Furuse, M.; Itoh, M.; Hirase, T.; Nagafuchi, A.; Yonemura, S.; Tsukita, S. Direct association of occludin with ZO-1 and its possible involvement in the localization of occludin at tight junctions. J. Cell Biol. 1994, 127 Pt 1, 1617–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Haskins, J.; Gu, L.; Wittchen, E.S.; Hibbard, J.; Stevenson, B.R. ZO-3, a novel member of the MAGUK protein family found at the tight junction, interacts with ZO-1 and occludin. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 141, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Itoh, M.; Furuse, M.; Morita, K.; Kubota, K.; Saitou, M.; Tsukita, S. Direct binding of three tight junction-associated MAGUKs, ZO-1, ZO-2, and ZO-3, with the COOH termini of claudins. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 147, 1351–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Castro, V.; Skowronska, M.; Lombardi, J.; He, J.; Seth, N.; Velichkovska, M.; Toborek, M. Occludin regulates glucose uptake and ATP production in pericytes by influencing AMP-activated protein kinase activity. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018, 38, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bauer, H.; Stelzhammer, W.; Fuchs, R.; Weiger, T.M.; Danninger, C.; Probst, G.; Krizbai, I.A. Astrocytes and neurons express the tight junction-specific protein occludin in vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 1999, 250, 434–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Morgan, S.V.; Garwood, C.J.; Jennings, L.; Simpson, J.E.; Castelli, L.M.; Heath, P.R.; Mihaylov, S.R.; Vaquéz-Villaseñor, I.; Minshull, T.C.; Ince, P.G.; et al. Proteomic and cellular localisation studies suggest non-tight junction cytoplasmic and nuclear roles for occludin in astrocytes. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2018, 47, 1444–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Horng, S.; Therattil, A.; Moyon, S.; Gordon, A.; Kim, K.; Argaw, A.T.; Hara, Y.; Mariani, J.N.; Sawai, S.; Flodby, P.; et al. Astrocytic tight junctions control inflammatory CNS lesion pathogenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3136–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Farrall, A.J.; Wardlaw, J.M. Blood-brain barrier: Ageing and microvascular disease-systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurobiol. Aging 2009, 30, 337–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baker, D.J.; Wijshake, T.; Tchkonia, T.; LeBrasseur, N.K.; Childs, B.G.; van de Sluis, B.; Kirkland, J.L.; van Deursen, J.M. Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders. Nature 2011, 479, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stamatovic, S.M.; Martinez-Revollar, G.; Hu, A.; Choi, J.; Keep, R.F.; Andjelkovic, A.V. Decline in Sirtuin-1 expression and activity plays a critical role in blood-brain barrier permeability in aging. Neurobiol. Dis. 2019, 126, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bake, S.; Sohrabji, F. 17beta-estradiol differentially regulates blood-brain barrier permeability in young and aging female rats. Endocrinology 2004, 145, 5471–5475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bake, S.; Friedman, J.A.; Sohrabji, F. Reproductive age-related changes in the blood brain barrier: Expression of IgG and tight junction proteins. Microvasc. Res. 2009, 78, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wilson, A.C.; Clemente, L.; Liu, T.; Bowen, R.L.; Meethal, S.V.; Atwood, C.S. Reproductive hormones regulate the selective permeability of the blood-brain barrier. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2008, 1782, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bell, R.D.; Winkler, E.A.; Sagare, A.P.; Singh, I.; LaRue, B.; Deane, R.; Zlokovic, B.V. Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron 2010, 68, 409–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mooradian, A.D.; Haas, M.J.; Chehade, J.M. Age-related changes in rat cerebral occludin and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1). Mech. Ageing Dev. 2003, 124, 143–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Osada, T.; Gu, Y.H.; Kanazawa, M.; Tsubota, Y.; Hawkins, B.T.; Spatz, M.; Milner, R.; del Zoppo, G.J. Interendothelial claudin-5 expression depends on cerebral endothelial cell-matrix adhesion by β (1)-integrins. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2011, 31, 1972–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Roberts, J.; de Hoog, L.; Bix, G.J. Mice deficient in endothelial α5 integrin are profoundly resistant to experimental ischemic stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Montagne, A.; Barnes, S.R.; Sweeney, M.D.; Halliday, M.R.; Sagare, A.P.; Zhao, Z.; Toga, A.W.; Jacobs, R.E.; Liu, C.Y.; Amezcua, L.; et al. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in the aging human hippocampus. Neuron 2015, 85, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yamazaki, Y.; Baker, D.J.; Tachibana, M.; Liu, C.C.; van Deursen, J.M.; Brott, T.G.; Bu, G.; Kanekiyo, T. Vascular Cell Senescence Contributes to Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown. Stroke 2016, 47, 1068–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schlingmann, B.; Overgaard, C.E.; Molina, S.A.; Lynn, K.S.; Mitchell, L.A.; Dorsainvil White, S.; Mattheyses, A.L.; Guidot, D.M.; Capaldo, C.T.; Koval, M. Regulation of claudin/zonula occludens-1 complexes by hetero-claudin interactions. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.Y.; Min, K.J. Sirtuin signaling in cellular senescence and aging. BMB Rep. 2019, 52, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Herskovits, A.Z.; Guarente, L. SIRT1 in neurodevelopment and brain senescence. Neuron 2014, 81, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Stirone, C.; Duckles, S.P.; Krause, D.N. Multiple forms of estrogen receptor-alpha in cerebral blood vessels: Regulation by estrogen. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol Metab. 2003, 284, E184–E192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Stewart, P.A.; Magliocco, M.; Hayakawa, K.; Farrell, C.L.; Del Maestro, R.F.; Girvin, J.; Kaufmann, J.C.; Vinters, H.V.; Gilbert, J. A quantitative analysis of blood-brain barrier ultrastructure in the aging human. Microvasc. Res. 1987, 33, 270–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Borghesan, M.; O’Loghlen, A. Integrins in senescence and aging. Cell Cycle 2017, 16, 909–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Labat-Robert, J. Cell-matrix interactions, alteration with aging and age associated diseases. A review. Pathol. Biol. 2001, 49, 349–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wu, X.; Reddy, D.S. Integrins as receptor targets for neurological disorders. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 134, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Stamatovic, S.M.; Sladojevic, N.; Keep, R.F.; Andjelkovic, A.V. Relocalization of junctional adhesion molecule A during inflammatory stimulation of brain endothelial cells. Mol. Cells Biol. 2012, 32, 3414–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mochida, G.H.; Ganesh, V.S.; Felie, J.M.; Gleason, D.; Hill, R.S.; Clapham, K.R.; Rakiec, D.; Tan, W.H.; Akawi, N.; Al-Saffar, M.; et al. A homozygous mutation in the tight-junction protein JAM3 causes hemorrhagic destruction of the brain, subependymal calcification, and congenital cataracts. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 87, 882–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Saitou, M.; Furuse, M.; Sasaki, H.; Schulzke, J.D.; Fromm, M.; Takano, H.; Noda, T.; Tsukita, S. Complex phenotype of mice lacking occludin, a component of tight junction strands. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11, 4131–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gonzalez-Lozano, M.A.; Klemmer, P.; Gebuis, T.; Hassan, C.; van Nierop, P.; van Kesteren, R.E.; Smit, A.B.; Li, K.W. Dynamics of the mouse brain cortical synaptic proteome during postnatal brain development. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zussy, C.; Loustalot, F.; Junyent, F.; Gardoni, F.; Bories, C.; Valero, J.; Desarménien, M.G.; Bernex, F.; Henaff, D.; Bayo-Puxan, N.; et al. Coxsackievirus Adenovirus Receptor Loss Impairs Adult Neurogenesis, Synapse Content, and Hippocampus Plasticity. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 9558–9571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Lochhead, J.J.; McCaffrey, G.; Quigley, C.E.; Finch, J.; DeMarco, K.M.; Nametz, N.; Davis, T.P. Oxidative stress increases blood-brain barrier permeability and induces alterations in occludin during hypoxia-reoxygenation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30, 1625–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Raz, L.; Knoefel, J.; Bhaskar, K. The neuropathology and cerebrovascular mechanisms of dementia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2016, 36, 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sugawara, T.; Fujimura, M.; Noshita, N.; Kim, G.W.; Saito, A.; Hayashi, T.; Narasimhan, P.; Maier, C.M.; Chan, P.H. Neuronal death/survival signaling pathways in cerebral ischemia. NeuroRx 2004, 1, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Roy-O’Reilly, M.; McCullough, L.D. Age and Sex Are Critical Factors in Ischemic Stroke Pathology. Endocrinology 2018, 159, 3120–3131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lutski, M.; Zucker, I.; Shohat, T.; Tanne, D. Characteristics and Outcomes of Young Patients with First-Ever Ischemic Stroke Compared to Older Patients: The National Acute Stroke ISraeli Registry. Front. Neurol. 2017, 8, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bauer, A.T.; Bürgers, H.F.; Rabie, T.; Marti, H.H. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 mediates hypoxia-induced vascular leakage in the brain via tight junction rearrangement. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30, 837–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Mark, K.S.; Davis, T.P. Cerebral microvascular changes in permeability and tight junctions induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2002, 282, H1485–H1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lischper, M.; Beuck, S.; Thanabalasundaram, G.; Pieper, C.; Galla, H.J. Metalloproteinase mediated occludin cleavage in the cerebral microcapillary endothelium under pathological conditions. Brain Res. 2010, 1326, 114–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Krizbai, I.; Bauer, H.; Bresgen, N.; Eckl, P.; Farkas, A.; Szatmari, E.; Traweger, A.; Wejksza, K.; Bauer, H. Effect of oxidative stress on the junctional proteins of cultured cerebral endothelial cells. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2005, 25, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Koto, T.; Takubo, K.; Ishida, S.; Shinoda, H.; Inoue, M.; Tsubota, K.; Okada, Y.; Ikeda, E. Hypoxia disrupts the barrier function of neural blood vessels through changes in the expression of claudin-5 in endothelial cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 170, 1389–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Schreibelt, G.; Kooij, G.; Reijerkerk, A.; van Doorn, R.; Gringhuis, S.I.; van der Pol, S.; Weksler, B.B.; Romero, I.A.; Couraud, P.O.; Piontek, J.; et al. Reactive oxygen species alter brain endothelial tight junction dynamics via RhoA, PI3 kinase, and PKB signaling. Faseb. J. 2007, 21, 3666–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Shen, F.; Jiang, L.; Han, F.; Degos, V.; Chen, S.; Su, H. Increased Inflammatory Response in Old Mice is Associated with More Severe Neuronal Injury at the Acute Stage of Ischemic Stroke. Aging Dis. 2019, 10, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Witt, K.A.; Mark, K.S.; Hom, S.; Davis, T.P. Effects of hypoxia-reoxygenation on rat blood-brain barrier permeability and tight junctional protein expression. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 285, H2820–H2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Willis, C.L.; Meske, D.S.; Davis, T.P. Protein kinase C activation modulates reversible increase in cortical blood-brain barrier permeability and tight junction protein expression during hypoxia and posthypoxic reoxygenation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010, 30, 1847–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Knowland, D.; Arac, A.; Sekiguchi, K.J.; Hsu, M.; Lutz, S.E.; Perrino, J.; Steinberg, G.K.; Barres, B.A.; Nimmerjahn, A.; Agalliu, D. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron 2014, 82, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kaur, J.; Tuor, U.I.; Zhao, Z.; Barber, P.A. Quantitative MRI reveals the elderly ischemic brain is susceptible to increased early blood-brain barrier permeability following tissue plasminogen activator related to claudin 5 and occludin disassembly. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2011, 31, 1874–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bai, Y.; Xu, G.; Xu, M.; Li, Q.; Qin, X. Inhibition of Src phosphorylation reduces damage to the blood-brain barrier following transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 34, 1473–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  90. Kago, T.; Takagi, N.; Date, I.; Takenaga, Y.; Takagi, K.; Takeo, S. Cerebral ischemia enhances tyrosine phosphorylation of occludin in brain capillaries. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 339, 1197–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Takenaga, Y.; Takagi, N.; Murotomi, K.; Tanonaka, K.; Takeo, S. Inhibition of Src activity decreases tyrosine phosphorylation of occludin in brain capillaries and attenuates increase in permeability of the blood-brain barrier after transient focal cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2009, 29, 1099–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Yang, Y.; Estrada, E.Y.; Thompson, J.F.; Liu, W.; Rosenberg, G.A. Matrix metalloproteinase-mediated disruption of tight junction proteins in cerebral vessels is reversed by synthetic matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor in focal ischemia in rat. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2007, 27, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yang, Y.; Rosenberg, G.A. MMP-mediated disruption of claudin-5 in the blood-brain barrier of rat brain after cerebral ischemia. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 762, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yang, Y.; Thompson, J.F.; Taheri, S.; Salayandia, V.M.; McAvoy, T.A.; Hill, J.W.; Estrada, E.Y.; Rosenberg, G.A. Early inhibition of MMP activity in ischemic rat brain promotes expression of tight junction proteins and angiogenesis during recovery. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2013, 33, 1104–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rom, S.; Zuluaga-Ramirez, V.; Dykstra, H.; Reichenbach, N.L.; Ramirez, S.H.; Persidsky, Y. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibition in brain endothelium protects the blood-brain barrier under physiologic and neuroinflammatory conditions. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2015, 35, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yang, Y.; Salayandia, V.M.; Thompson, J.F.; Yang, L.Y.; Estrada, E.Y. Attenuation of acute stroke injury in rat brain by minocycline promotes blood-brain barrier remodeling and alternative microglia/macrophage activation during recovery. J. Neuroinflammation 2015, 12, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Weinl, C.; Castaneda Vega, S.; Riehle, H.; Stritt, C.; Calaminus, C.; Wolburg, H.; Mauel, S.; Breithaupt, A.; Gruber, A.D.; Wasylyk, B.; et al. Endothelial depletion of murine SRF/MRTF provokes intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9914–9919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, W.; Dentler, W.L.; Borchardt, R.T. VEGF increases BMEC monolayer permeability by affecting occludin expression and tight junction assembly. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2001, 280, H434–H440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Argaw, A.T.; Asp, L.; Zhang, J.; Navrazhina, K.; Pham, T.; Mariani, J.N.; Mahase, S.; Dutta, D.J.; Seto, J.; Kramer, E.G.; et al. Astrocyte-derived VEGF-A drives blood-brain barrier disruption in CNS inflammatory disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 2454–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Elahy, M.; Jackaman, C.; Mamo, J.C.; Lam, V.; Dhaliwal, S.S.; Giles, C.; Nelson, D.; Takechi, R. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction developed during normal aging is associated with inflammation and loss of tight junctions but not with leukocyte recruitment. Immun. Ageing 2015, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Banks, W.A.; Farr, S.A.; Morley, J.E. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier to albumin and insulin in the young and aged SAMP8 mouse. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2000, 55, B601–B606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Engelhardt, S.; Patkar, S.; Ogunshola, O.O. Cell-specific blood-brain barrier regulation in health and disease: A focus on hypoxia. Br. J. Pharm. 2014, 171, 1210–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Liu, W.; Sood, R.; Chen, Q.; Sakoglu, U.; Hendren, J.; Cetin, O.; Miyake, M.; Liu, K.J. Normobaric hyperoxia inhibits NADPH oxidase-mediated matrix metalloproteinase-9 induction in cerebral microvessels in experimental stroke. J. Neurochem. 2008, 107, 1196–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Blasig, I.E.; Bellmann, C.; Cording, J.; del Vecchio, G.; Zwanziger, D.; Huber, O.; Haseloff, R.F. Occludin Protein Family: Oxidative Stress and Reducing Conditions. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 1195–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Bellmann, C.; Schreivogel, S.; Günther, R.; Dabrowski, S.; Schümann, M.; Wolburg, H.; Blasig, I.E. Highly conserved cysteines are involved in the oligomerization of occludin-redox dependency of the second extracellular loop. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 855–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Erickson, M.A.; Banks, W.A. Neuroimmune Axes of the Blood-Brain Barriers and Blood-Brain Interfaces: Bases for Physiological Regulation, Disease States, and Pharmacological Interventions. Pharm. Rev. 2018, 70, 278–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Erickson, M.A.; Banks, W.A. Age-Associated Changes in the Immune System and Blood⁻Brain Barrier Functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ransohoff, R.M.; Engelhardt, B. The anatomical and cellular basis of immune surveillance in the central nervous system. Nat. Rev. Immunol 2012, 12, 623–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ousman, S.S.; Kubes, P. Immune surveillance in the central nervous system. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 1096–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Varatharaj, A.; Galea, I. The blood-brain barrier in systemic inflammation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017, 60, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gemechu, J.M.; Bentivoglio, M. T Cell Recruitment in the Brain during Normal Aging. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2012, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Xu, Y.Z.; Nygård, M.; Kristensson, K.; Bentivoglio, M. Regulation of cytokine signaling and T-cell recruitment in the aging mouse brain in response to central inflammatory challenge. Brain Behav. Immun. 2010, 24, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Stichel, C.C.; Luebbert, H. Inflammatory processes in the aging mouse brain: Participation of dendritic cells and T-cells. Neurobiol. Aging 2007, 28, 1507–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ritzel, R.M.; Crapser, J.; Patel, A.R.; Verma, R.; Grenier, J.M.; Chauhan, A.; Jellison, E.R.; McCullough, L.D. Age-Associated Resident Memory CD8 T Cells in the Central Nervous System Are Primed to Potentiate Inflammation after Ischemic Brain Injury. J. Immunol 2016, 196, 3318–3330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Miguel-Hidalgo, J.J.; Nithuairisg, S.; Stockmeier, C.; Rajkowska, G. Distribution of ICAM-1 immunoreactivity during aging in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Brain Behav. Immun. 2007, 21, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Dulken, B.W.; Buckley, M.T.; Navarro Negredo, P.; Saligrama, N.; Cayrol, R.; Leeman, D.S.; George, B.M.; Boutet, S.C.; Hebestreit, K.; Pluvinage, J.V.; et al. Single-cell analysis reveals T cell infiltration in old neurogenic niches. Nature 2019, 571, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Suidan, G.L.; Mcdole, J.R.; Chen, Y.; Pirko, I.; Johnson, A.J. Induction of blood brain barrier tight junction protein alterations by CD8 T cells. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Erickson, M.A.; Banks, W.A. Blood-brain barrier dysfunction as a cause and consequence of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2013, 33, 1500–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yamazaki, Y.; Kanekiyo, T. Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Marco, S.; Skaper, S.D. Amyloid beta-peptide1–42 alters tight junction protein distribution and expression in brain microvessel endothelial cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 401, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Janota, C.; Lemere, C.A.; Brito, M.A. Dissecting the Contribution of Vascular Alterations and Aging to Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 3793–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Wan, W.; Chen, H.; Li, Y. The potential mechanisms of Aβ-receptor for advanced glycation end-products interaction disrupting tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Neurosci. 2014, 124, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Rosenberg, G.A. Matrix metalloproteinases and their multiple roles in neurodegenerative diseases. Lancet Neurol. 2009, 8, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Bourasset, F.; Ouellet, M.; Tremblay, C.; Julien, C.; Do, T.M.; Oddo, S.; LaFerla, F.; Calon, F. Reduction of the cerebrovascular volume in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56, 808–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Carrano, A.; Hoozemans, J.J.; van der Vies, S.M.; van Horssen, J.; de Vries, H.E.; Rozemuller, A.J. Neuroinflammation and blood-brain barrier changes in capillary amyloid angiopathy. Neurodegener. Dis. 2012, 10, 329–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Carrano, A.; Hoozemans, J.J.; van der Vies, S.M.; Rozemuller, A.J.; van Horssen, J.; de Vries, H.E. Amyloid Beta induces oxidative stress-mediated blood-brain barrier changes in capillary amyloid angiopathy. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 15, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Bruban, J.; Glotin, A.L.; Dinet, V.; Chalour, N.; Sennlaub, F.; Jonet, L.; An, N.; Faussat, A.M.; Mascarelli, F. Amyloid-beta (1–42) alters structure and function of retinal pigmented epithelial cells. Aging Cell 2009, 8, 162–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kook, S.Y.; Hong, H.S.; Moon, M.; Ha, C.M.; Chang, S.; Mook-Jung, I. Aβ142-RAGE interaction disrupts tight junctions of the blood-brain barrier via Ca2+-calcineurin signaling. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 8845–8854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wan, W.; Cao, L.; Liu, L.; Zhang, C.; Kalionis, B.; Tai, X.; Li, Y.; Xia, S. Aβ (1–42) oligomer-induced leakage in an in vitro blood-brain barrier model is associated with up-regulation of RAGE and metalloproteinases, and down-regulation of tight junction scaffold proteins. J. Neurochem. 2015, 134, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wan, W.B.; Cao, L.; Liu, L.M.; Kalionis, B.; Chen, C.; Tai, X.T.; Li, Y.M.; Xia, S.J. EGb761 provides a protective effect against Aβ1-42 oligomer-induced cell damage and blood-brain barrier disruption in an in vitro bEnd.3 endothelial model. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Park, J.C.; Baik, S.H.; Han, S.H.; Cho, H.J.; Choi, H.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, W.; Kim, D.K.; Mook-Jung, I. Annexin A1 restores Aβ1-42-induced blood-brain barrier disruption through the inhibition of RhoA-ROCK signaling pathway. Aging Cell 2017, 16, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mehrabadi, A.R.; Korolainen, M.A.; Odero, G.; Miller, D.W.; Kauppinen, T.M. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 regulates microglia mediated decrease of endothelial tight junction integrity. Neurochem. Int. 2017, 108, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Chen, X.; Lan, X.; Roche, I.; Liu, R.; Geiger, J.D. Caffeine protects against MPTP-induced blood-brain barrier dysfunction in mouse striatum. J. Neurochem. 2008, 107, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sarkar, S.; Chigurupati, S.; Raymick, J.; Mann, D.; Bowyer, J.F.; Schmitt, T.; Beger, R.D.; Hanig, J.P.; Schmued, L.C.; Paule, M.G. Neuroprotective effect of the chemical chaperone, trehalose in a chronic MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease mouse model. Neurotoxicology 2014, 44, 250–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Carvey, P.M.; Zhao, C.H.; Hendey, B.; Lum, H.; Trachtenberg, J.; Desai, B.S.; Snyder, J.; Zhu, Y.G.; Ling, Z.D. 6-Hydroxydopamine-induced alterations in blood-brain barrier permeability. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2005, 22, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Huang, L.; Deng, M.; He, Y.; Lu, S.; Ma, R.; Fang, Y. β-asarone and levodopa co-administration increase striatal dopamine level in 6-hydroxydopamine induced rats by modulating P-glycoprotein and tight junction proteins at the blood-brain barrier and promoting levodopa into the brain. Clin. Exp. Pharm. Physiol. 2016, 43, 634–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kuan, W.L.; Bennett, N.; He, X.; Skepper, J.N.; Martynyuk, N.; Wijeyekoon, R.; Moghe, P.V.; Williams-Gray, C.H.; Barker, R.A. α-Synuclein pre-formed fibrils impair tight junction protein expression without affecting cerebral endothelial cell function. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 285 Pt A, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Pienaar, I.S.; Lee, C.H.; Elson, J.L.; McGuinness, L.; Gentleman, S.M.; Kalaria, R.N.; Dexter, D.T. Deep-brain stimulation associates with improved microvascular integrity in the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015, 74, 392–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Gray, M.T.; Woulfe, J.M. Striatal blood-brain barrier permeability in Parkinson’s disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2015, 35, 747–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Drouin-Ouellet, J.; Sawiak, S.J.; Cisbani, G.; Lagacé, M.; Kuan, W.L.; Saint-Pierre, M.; Dury, R.J.; Alata, W.; St-Amour, I.; Mason, S.L.; et al. Cerebrovascular and blood-brain barrier impairments in Huntington’s disease: Potential implications for its pathophysiology. Ann. Neurol. 2015, 78, 160–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lim, R.G.; Quan, C.; Reyes-Ortiz, A.M.; Lutz, S.E.; Kedaigle, A.J.; Gipson, T.A.; Wu, J.; Vatine, G.D.; Stocksdale, J.; Casale, M.S.; et al. Huntington’s Disease iPSC-Derived Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells Reveal WNT-Mediated Angiogenic and Blood-Brain Barrier Deficits. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 1365–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Greene, C.; Kealy, J.; Humphries, M.M.; Gong, Y.; Hou, J.; Hudson, N.; Cassidy, L.M.; Martiniano, R.; Shashi, V.; Hooper, S.R.; et al. Dose-dependent expression of claudin-5 is a modifying factor in schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 23, 2156–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Takechi, R.; Galloway, S.; Pallebage-Gamarallage, M.M.; Mamo, J.C. Chylomicron amyloid-beta in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Atheroscler. Suppl. 2008, 9, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Poduslo, J.F.; Curran, G.L.; Wengenack, T.M.; Malester, B.; Duff, K. Permeability of proteins at the blood-brain barrier in the normal adult mouse and double transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2001, 8, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  145. Cheng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, E. Central nervous system penetration for small molecule therapeutic agents does not increase in multiple sclerosis- and Alzheimer’s disease-related animal models despite reported blood-brain barrier disruption. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2010, 38, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Mehta, D.C.; Short, J.L.; Nicolazzo, J.A. Altered brain uptake of therapeutics in a triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Pharm. Res. 2013, 30, 2868–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Daneman, R.; Zhou, L.; Kebede, A.A.; Barres, B.A. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 2010, 468, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sagare, A.P.; Bell, R.D.; Zhao, Z.; Ma, Q.; Winkler, E.A.; Ramanathan, A.; Zlokovic, B.V. Pericyte loss influences Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration in mice. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sengillo, J.D.; Winkler, E.A.; Walker, C.T.; Sullivan, J.S.; Johnson, M.; Zlokovic, B.V. Deficiency in mural vascular cells coincides with blood-brain barrier disruption in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2013, 23, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tai, L.M.; Thomas, R.; Marottoli, F.M.; Koster, K.P.; Kanekiyo, T.; Morris, A.W.; Bu, G. The role of APOE in cerebrovascular dysfunction. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 131, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Brandon, J.A.; Farmer, B.C.; Williams, H.C.; Johnson, L.A. Apoe and Alzheimer’s Disease: Neuroimaging of Metabolic and Cerebrovascular Dysfunction. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Bell, R.D.; Winkler, E.A.; Singh, I.; Sagare, A.P.; Deane, R.; Wu, Z.; Holtzman, D.M.; Betsholtz, C.; Armulik, A.; Sallstrom, J.; et al. Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature 2012, 485, 512–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Daneman, R.; Prat, A. The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a020412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Zenaro, E.; Piacentino, G.; Constantin, G. The blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2017, 107, 41–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sweeney, M.D.; Sagare, A.P.; Zlokovic, B.V. Blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 14, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Greene, C.; Hanley, N.; Campbell, M. Claudin-5: Gatekeeper of neurological function. Fluids Barriers CNS 2019, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Lee, H.; Pienaar, I.S. Disruption of the blood-brain barrier in Parkinson’s disease: Curse or route to a cure? Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2014, 19, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Pan, Y.; Nicolazzo, J.A. Impact of aging, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease on the blood-brain barrier transport of therapeutics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 135, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Farkas, E.; De Jong, G.I.; de Vos, R.A.; Jansen Steur, E.N.; Luiten, P.G. Pathological features of cerebral cortical capillaries are doubled in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2000, 100, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Guan, J.; Pavlovic, D.; Dalkie, N.; Waldvogel, H.J.; O’Carroll, S.J.; Green, C.R.; Nicholson, L.F. Vascular degeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2013, 23, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Hill, K.K.; Campbell, M.C.; McNeely, M.E.; Karimi, M.; Ushe, M.; Tabbal, S.D.; Hershey, T.; Flores, H.P.; Hartlein, J.M.; Lugar, H.M.; et al. Cerebral blood flow responses to dorsal and ventral STN DBS correlate with gait and balance responses in Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 241, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Horvath, S.; Langfelder, P.; Kwak, S.; Aaronson, J.; Rosinski, J.; Vogt, T.F.; Eszes, M.; Faull, R.L.; Curtis, M.A.; Waldvogel, H.J.; et al. Huntington’s disease accelerates epigenetic aging of human brain and disrupts DNA methylation levels. Aging (Albany Ny) 2016, 8, 1485–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Okusaga, O.O. Accelerated aging in schizophrenia patients: The potential role of oxidative stress. Aging Dis. 2014, 5, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.