Next Article in Journal
Gap Junction-Mediated Intercellular Communication of cAMP Prevents CDDP-Induced Ototoxicity via cAMP/PKA/CREB Pathway
Next Article in Special Issue
(S)-Reutericyclin: Susceptibility Testing and In Vivo Effect on Murine Fecal Microbiome and Volatile Organic Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Preclinical Development of FA5, a Novel AMP-Activated Protein Kinase (AMPK) Activator as an Innovative Drug for the Management of Bowel Inflammation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Longitudinal Changes in Diet Cause Repeatable and Largely Reversible Shifts in Gut Microbial Communities of Laboratory Mice and Are Observed across Segments of the Entire Intestinal Tract
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Diet-Regulating Microbiota and Host Immune System in Liver Disease

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(12), 6326; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126326
by Jung A Eom †, Goo Hyun Kwon †, Na Yeon Kim †, Eun Ju Park, Sung Min Won, Jin Ju Jeong, Ganesan Raja, Haripriya Gupta, Yoseph Asmelash Gebru, Satyapriya Sharma, Ye Rin Choi, Hyeong Seop Kim, Sang Jun Yoon, Ji Ye Hyun, Min Kyo Jeong, Hee Jin Park, Byeong Hyun Min, Mi Ran Choi, Dong Joon Kim and Ki Tae Suk *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(12), 6326; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126326
Submission received: 28 May 2021 / Revised: 7 June 2021 / Accepted: 10 June 2021 / Published: 13 June 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In general, I found this review interesting and well written. Th authors have clearly summarized recent evidence on the relationship between diet-regulating microbiota and host immune system, especially in liver diseases. For this reason, I would suggest to clarify in the title that this review is focused on liver diseases. Moreover, I would suggest to expand the discussion section (i.e., perspective and conclusion), explaining the needs and approaches for future research.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Eom et al. review the role of microbiota in liver disease. The authors provide a good summary how pro-/pre-/syn-biotic interventions can affect different types and stages of liver disease. The text is well grafted and easy to follow. Before publication, I would suggest that the authors address these comments:

  • As the focus is on liver disease, I would suggest adjusting to title accordingly.
  • For the listed human trials, please, also include the size of the study population / study groups and the trial design (e.g., RCT, crossover, …).
  • I would suggest expanding the conclusion section. The highlighted studies clearly demonstrate that treatments can be effective, but the attempted treatment regimens are very diverse. Is there anything that we can conclude on the relative effect sizes of the different treatment options and on the most promising directions for the future?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop