Next Article in Journal
Cellular Interaction of Human Skin Cells towards Natural Bioink via 3D-Bioprinting Technologies for Chronic Wound: A Comprehensive Review
Next Article in Special Issue
The Induced Expression of BPV E4 Gene in Equine Adult Dermal Fibroblast Cells as a Potential Model of Skin Sarcoid-like Neoplasia
Previous Article in Journal
Prospects and Applications of Natural Blood-Derived Products in Regenerative Medicine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Anabolic Steroids-Driven Regulation of Porcine Ovarian Putative Stem Cells Favors the Onset of Their Neoplastic Transformation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms23010475
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Brachygnathia Inferior in Cloned Dogs Is Possibly Correlated with Variants of Wnt Signaling Pathway Initiators

by
Yong-ho Choe
1,†,
Tai-Young Hur
2,†,
Sung-Lim Lee
1,3,*,
Seunghoon Lee
2,
Dajeong Lim
4,
Bong-Hwan Choi
4,
Haeyun Jeong
2,
Jin-Gu No
2 and
Sun A Ock
2,*
1
Department of Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
2
Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA), 1500, Kongjwipatjwi-ro, Isero-myeon, Wanju 55365, Korea
3
Research Institute of Life Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
4
Division of Animal Genomics & Bioinformatics, NIAS, RDA, Kongjwipatjwi-ro, Isero-myeon, Wanju 55365, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(1), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010475
Submission received: 15 November 2021 / Revised: 13 December 2021 / Accepted: 15 December 2021 / Published: 1 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanism and Application of Somatic Cell Cloning in Mammals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Abnormalities in animals cloned via somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) have been reported. In this study, to produce bomb-sniffing dogs, we successfully cloned four healthy dogs through SCNT using the same donor genome from the skin of a male German shepherd old dog. Veterinary diagnosis (X-ray/3D-CT imaging) revealed that two cloned dogs showed normal phenotypes, whereas the others showed abnormal shortening of the mandible (brachygnathia inferior) at 1 month after birth, even though they were cloned under the same conditions except for the oocyte source. Therefore, we aimed to determine the genetic cause of brachygnathia inferior in these cloned dogs. To determine the genetic defects related to brachygnathia inferior, we performed karyotyping and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for identifying small genetic alterations in the genome, such as single-nucleotide variations or frameshifts. There were no chromosomal numerical abnormalities in all cloned dogs. However, WGS analysis revealed variants of Wnt signaling pathway initiators (WNT5B, DVL2, DACT1, ARRB2, FZD 4/8) and cadherin (CDH11, CDH1like) in cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior. In conclusion, this study proposes that brachygnathia inferior in cloned dogs may be associated with variants in initiators and/or regulators of the Wnt/cadherin signaling pathway.

1. Introduction

Animal cloning is a useful technology in developmental biology and genetic studies and in the restoration of endangered species [1,2,3]. Since the first successful dog cloning was reported [1], cloning has been applied not only in the commercial breeding of companion dogs but also in the production of working dogs with various desirable abilities [4].
Dog cloning differs from cloning in other animals, such as sheep, cattle, and pigs, owing to the different reproductive processes, such as ovulation of oocytes at the metaphase I stage. Therefore, dog cloning is performed with in vivo-matured oocytes, after which cloned embryos are quickly transferred into the oviduct to overcome the inadequate in vitro culture systems [5,6]. The cloned offspring are expected to not only genetically but also phenotypically identical to the original donor dog [7]. However, abnormal phenotypes not present in the original dog may appear in the clones, and this is presumed to occur during developmental events. This phenomenon has been commonly reported and studied in detail in other animals [2,8,9], but minimally reported in cloned dogs.
Defects in cloned animals mainly include high or low birth weight, placental abnormalities, and pulmonary and cardiovascular disorders [3]. Brachygnathia inferior (also called underbite, overshot, parrot mouth, or prognathia), an osteogenesis imperfecta presenting as shortening of the mandible, is a common congenital anomaly in sheep and cattle [10,11]. However, brachygnathia inferior is very rarely found in dogs [12], and there have been no reports of brachygnathia inferior in cloned dogs.
In the present study, we identified that out of four dogs cloned under the same conditions, except for the oocytes, two exhibited abnormalities including brachygnathia inferior. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to detect and determine the causes of brachygnathia inferior in cloned dogs. Therefore, we aimed to determine the genetic cause of brachygnathia inferior in these cloned dogs. Genome sequencing is a powerful tool for discovering genes and genetic variants that cause a disease [13]. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can provide information on the entire DNA sequence of the genome of an individual and serve as a tool for determining the genomic variation that increases the risk for common and rare disorders. Using WGS and functional prediction tools, we identified the specific genes that were upregulated only in these abnormal cloned dogs and the signaling pathways associated with the phenotypic features of brachygnathia inferior. We revealed mutations in the initiators and/or modulators of two important signaling pathways related to brachygnathia inferior in the cloned dogs.

2. Results

2.1. Production of Cloned Dogs

A total of 89 nuclear transfer (NT) embryos were transferred to 10 surrogate mother dogs. The pregnancy rate was confirmed to be 20% (2 out of 10 dogs). Surrogate mother dogs (SMD), called SMD1 and SMD2, gave birth to one offspring (NT-1) by cesarean section (≈60 days of gestation) and five offspring (NT-2 to -6) by natural delivery, respectively (Figure S1A,B). Among the five offspring delivered by SMD2, three (NT-2, 3, and 4) survived, but two died: one was stillborn (NT-5), and the other died of hypothermia (NT-6) at one day after delivery (Figure 1). The cloning efficacy ratio, calculated from the number of live offspring per number of transferred embryos, was 5.6%.
To evaluate the genetic identity of the offspring, we compared canine-specific polymorphic microsatellites between the cloned puppies and donor cells. As shown in Table 1, the cloned puppies and donor cells showed genetic homogeneity, confirming that the puppies were cloned from the original dog.

2.2. Care and Feeding of Cloned Offspring

NT-1, the first cloned puppy, was fed by bottle because the surrogate mother did not care for her baby. During the artificial nursing period, slight pneumonia occurred, but was completely cured within one week. NT-2, -3, and -4, who were born by the same SMD2, were successfully breastfed by their SMD2. At the age of one month old, every puppy was stopped from milk feeding and fed commercial feed. The weight of all cloned puppies measured daily was in normal range, but the weight growth rates of NT-1 and -3 were lower than those of NT-2 and -4 until one month after birth (Figure S1C). Both NT-1 and -3 showed jaw abnormalities, such as open-bite malocclusion of the mandible, starting at one month after birth, especially NT-1 (Figure 2A). Further detailed analyses were performed to determine the cause.

2.3. Clinical Diagnosis of Brachygnathia Inferior

First, NT-1, which presented severe jaw abnormality, was subjected to veterinary pathological analysis. Complete blood count (CBC) and biochemical parameters were within the reference ranges, without significant differences. CBC values were similar between the donor dog and the cloned offspring (Table 2). There were no differences in biochemical parameters, such as creatinine, glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TB), total protein (TP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase, cholesterol, and amylase levels, between the original dog and the clones (Table 3).
The cloned dogs were diagnosed by visual inspection and X-ray/computed tomography (CT) examinations. Mandibular malocclusion was observed in both NT-1 and -3, whereas NT-1 presented severe mandibular malocclusion. In the case of NT-1, malalignment of the central axis of the skull was confirmed in the dorsoventral view of the craniofacial radiograph (Figure 2B(i)). Additionally, the craniofacial angle between the maxilla and the mandible in the lateral view of the craniofacial region was measured by radiography (Figure 2B(ii)). NT-1 showed an increased craniofacial angle compared to the donor dog and NT-2. NT-1 showed normal teeth arrangement in terms of the number and order, but its tooth morphology was irregular and denser compared with that of the donor dog and NT-2. In NT-1, it was confirmed through three-dimensional CT images that the maxillary canines protruded to a greater extent than the mandibular canines (Figure 2C), unlike those in the donor dogs and NT-2. When the above findings were considered, NT-1 was diagnosed with typical brachygnathia inferior.

2.4. Chromosomal Aberrations in the Donor and Cloned Dogs

Karyotyping was performed to analyze chromosomal abnormalities in peripheral blood samples from all cloned dogs and the donor dog. All samples were read as normal diploids with 78 + XY (Figure 3). It was found that cloning did not induce chromosomal aberrations, observed as numerical and structural abnormalities, and thus brachygnathia inferior did not occur as a result of large-scale chromosomal aberrations.
Therefore, further studies were performed to identify the cause of brachygnathia inferior in the cloned dogs on the basis of single nucleotide variations (SNVs) or short insertions/deletions (indels).

2.5. Identification and Validation of Candidate Genes for Brachygnathia Inferior by Whole-Genome Sequencing

WGS was performed for the donor dogs and cloned offspring, and high-quality sequence data were obtained. Data on variants were subjected to quality control, and the results are presented in Tables S1–S3. The circos plot of WGS confirmed the presence of genomic variations, including SNVs and indels, between the groups (Figure 4). Coexisting variants present in all animal subjects including the donor dog were filtered. Through Venn diagram analysis, we identified 10,112 variants in 3164 genes, including unique SNVs and indels, exclusively in the group with brachygnathia inferior (Figure 4B). These variants were located in the protein-coding and intergenic regions of the 3164 genes.
Next, we examined whether these 3164 genes have phenotype-related functions. To determine the biological characteristics of these candidate genes for brachygnathia inferior, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) analysis on biological processes using the DAVID database. Among the 3164 genes, 1471 genes were significantly enriched (p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 5A. The biological functions of these genes are mostly related to cellular and systemic developmental processes. Interestingly, out of the 1471 genes, 221 were involved in anatomical structure morphogenesis (p = 0.000007).
Furthermore, functional prediction was conducted for the 3164 candidate genes using the Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER) annotation system. Out of the 3164 candidate genes, 1913 were mapped on 110 pathways, and the top 10 pathways are presented in Figure 5B. The top four enriched pathways were identified as the Wnt (47%), cadherin (31%), integrin signaling (30%), and gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (27%) pathways.
A Venn diagram showing the overlapping of genes related to the four pathways revealed that the Wnt (Figure 5C(ii)) and cadherin (Figure 5C(iii)) signaling pathways had many shared genes, compared to the integrin (Figure 5C(i)) and gonadotropin (Figure 5C(iv)) signaling pathways. Thus, 50 candidate genes for brachygnathia inferior were extracted from the 1913 genes related to the Wnt/cadherin signaling pathway (Figure 5D, detailed in Table 4). Of these 50 genes, 30 were shared between the Wnt and cadherin signaling pathway.
Detailed information on mutations in 50 candidate genes for brachygnathia inferior is summarized as shown in Table 4. Especially, two uncharacterized proteins and six genes (CDH8, CDH12, PCDH9, CTNND2, PCDH9, and ENSCAFG00000023180) with more than 10 variations were identified. Thus, it is presumed that these specific variants in NT-1 and -3 cause alterations in genes related to the Wnt/cadherin signaling pathway, although the exact mechanism is unknown.

2.6. Interactive Network Analysis of Candidate Genes for Brachygnathia Inferior

To elucidate how these candidate genes for brachygnathia inferior interact with each other, we predicted a protein–protein interaction network using the STRING database. We found 132 interaction edges with an enrichment p-value < 10−15, as shown in Figure 6. A total of 50 candidate genes for brachygnathia inferior were confirmed to be related to the Wnt (yellow highlight)/cadherin (red highlight) signaling pathway. The network showed that the genes were closely interacting with each other, with WNT5B, ARRB2, CTNNA3, and CTNND2 at the center.

3. Discussion

Many animals have been cloned via nucleus transfer from somatic cells to mature oocytes in vitro [14,15,16,17,18]. However, owing to inadequate in vitro culture conditions and different estrus cycles, dogs are typically cloned using surgically recovered mature oocytes in vivo [5,6]. Nevertheless, the cloned dogs were also found to have many abnormalities as in other cloned animals [19]. In cloned animals, the causes of these abnormalities include incomplete reprogramming and imprinting, as well as inappropriate culture environment [20,21,22]. However, the cause has not been clearly identified. We found brachygnathia inferior for the first time in cloned dogs and attempted to identify the cause through analysis of genetic signals involved in embryonic fate.
The efficiency of cloning, which is calculated from the number of viable offspring per transferred embryo, is known to be 5–15%, depending on the animal species [3]. The cloning efficiency of the first cloned sheep, Dolly, was 3.4%. In the present study, the 5.6% cloning efficiency was similar to that reported in previous studies. This efficiency value indicates that 95–85% of SCNT embryos died before reaching full term [23]. In addition, a high incidence of malformations, large offspring syndrome, placental defects, and brain defects, as well as pulmonary, renal, and cardiovascular failure were observed in the placenta, fetuses, and offspring in cloned animals [3,22]. Incomplete remodeling and abnormal epigenetic modification of somatic nucleic acids have been identified as the cause of these abnormalities [20,21,22]. In cloned dogs, cleft palate and abnormal external genitalia such as failure of preputial closure at the ventral distal part and persistent penile frenulum have been reported [19]. In the present study, although there were no abnormalities in hematological parameters and chromosome numbers among the four cloned dogs produced by SCNT under the same environmental conditions, brachygnathia inferior caused by growth failure of mandible occurred in two dogs, as determined by morphological observation, X-ray imaging, and CT diagnosis at 1 month after birth.
Craniofacial malformations, such as cleft palate and mandibular abnormalities, have been studied in many animals. Despite the relatively high incidence of these disorders, their genetic cause have not been studied in detail. In cattle, trisomy 17 and 22 [24,25], as well as mutations in GON4L [26], are related to brachygnathia inferior. In sheep, frameshift in OBSL1 has been shown to affect brachygnathia inferior [27], and mutations in COL1A1 and COL1A2 cause osteogenesis imperfecta [28]. In dogs, LINE-1 insertion within DLX6 induces cleft palate and mandibular abnormalities, as reported by a genome-wide association study in a canine model [29]. The skull shape of dogs is regulated by a missense mutation in BMP3 [30]. In the present study, WGS analysis revealed that cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior had 10,112 SNVs and indels in 3164 genes, compared to normal dogs without brachygnathia inferior. Interestingly, two variants between BMP3 and PRKG3, n.5244256C>T and n.5248552A>G, were detected in cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior. However, these two single-nucleotide variants were located in the intergenic region. It was difficult to evaluate their effect on mandibular abnormalities [31].
The Wnt signaling pathway is known to be involved in cell destiny, polarity, and migration during embryonic development and differentiation [32,33]. The major Wnt signaling pathways are divided into canonical pathways that start with the binding of Wnt ligands (WNT 1, WNT 3, WNT 7, etc.), Frizzled (Fzd) receptors, and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) 5 or LRP6, as well as into non-canonical pathways that start with the binding of WNT5a class ligand and FZD receptor. The non-canonical Wnt pathway consists of two types: the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway, related to cell polarity and migration, and the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway, which is involved in the activation of Ca2+-dependent proteins (CaMK2, PKC, and calcium) related to cell differentiation, relocation, and adhesion. In both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways, the cascade begins through the activation/induction of Dishevelled (Dsh) via the binding of Wnt and FZD [34,35,36]. In the present study, through Wnt/cadherin signaling network analysis in cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior, we found that WNT5B interacted closely with FZD4, FZD8, DVL2, β-adrrestin2 (ARBB2), and DVL binding antagonist of β-catenin (DACT1) as negative regulators of WNT signaling, and that these genes were closely related to initiators of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways [37]. Pathogenic variants of these genes were also identified, including tumor or posterior malformation in FZD4 (c.74G>T), ARRB2 (c.287A>C), and DACT1 (c.1561-1G>A) in humans and mice [37,38,39].
In the β-catenin-independent pathway, the WNT5 subfamily, including WNT5a and WNT5b, which can combine with FZD4 or FZD8, is closely involved in osteogenesis, and disruption of the WNT5 subfamily leads to skeletal defects [40,41]. In osteoblastic cell lines, cadherin 11 (calcium-dependent adhesion, CDH 11) is implicated in bone development and maintenance [42]. E-cadherin (CDH1) interacts with catenin α-δ types in the cytoplasm, and their complexes are important for epithelial cell polarity and function [43]. Therefore, we propose that brachygnathia inferior in cloned dogs was affected by two pathways: (1) the non-canonical WNT pathway, such as activation by DVL2/ARRB2 or inhibition by DVL2/DACT1 after the binding of WNT5b to FZD4/FZD8, and (2) the catenin/cadherin pathway via the interaction of α/δ catenin (CTNNA3, CTNND2) and CDH by ARRB2. The involvement of the catenin/cadherin pathway is supported by the discovery of LOC489647 (cadherin-1-like) [44].
Although it is not possible to precisely estimate how the Wnt and cadherin signaling pathways are differentially expressed in dogs cloned under the same conditions, it is presumed that the use of oocytes recovered from different dogs affects the reprogramming of donor somatic cell nuclei from the original donor dog. This hypothesis is supported by previous reports that oocyte cytoplasm extracts such as ooplasmic factor can regulate the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei, such as the demethylation of histones [45,46].

4. Conclusions

This study revealed that brachygnathia inferior in cloned dogs was associated with variants in the initiators and/or regulators of the Wnt/cadherin signaling pathway, especially the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway via WNT5b. Although the direct cause of the abnormalities in cloned dogs, such as brachygnathia inferior, could not be determined, it was presumed that the oocytes used for cloning altered the reprogramming of the donor somatic cells. In order for this hypothesis to be proven, further gene editing and epigenetic reprogramming error studies are necessary in order to identify abnormalities in cloned offspring. However, considering that dogs are companion animals, and not laboratory animals such as mice, future research for identifying the related genetic variants should utilize genetic samples from dogs with brachygnathia inferior that are naturally born.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Animals

All experiments were authorized by the Animal Center for Biomedical Experimentation at the National Institute of Animal Science of the Rural Development Administration (approval number 2015-143 on 21 May 2015) and followed animal care and use guidelines.

5.2. Cloning of Dogs

For dog cloning, somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) and embryo transfer were performed according to a previously described protocol [6] with minor modifications, as shown in Figure 1. As donor cells, ear fibroblasts were collected from a 5-year-old male German shepherd dog (original donor) via ear skin biopsy after anesthesia. The original dog was diagnosed with a normal phenotype that was clinically healthy and without physical disabilities. Fibroblasts at the second to third passage were stored in LN2 before use as donor cells in SCNT. Three days prior to SCNT, the cryopreserved cells were thawed and cultured at a seeding concentration of 5 × 104 cells per well in a 4-well dish. Cells at the second to third passage were used for the production of cloned embryos. After SCNT, the embryos were immediately surgically transferred into the oviduct of a surrogate mother using a previously described method [6]. Pregnancy rates were determined by ultrasound diagnosis at ≈31 days after embryo transfer.

5.3. Microsatellite Analysis for Confirmation of Paternity

For confirmation of genetic identity, genomic DNA was extracted from the blood of four cloned dogs with a Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and from donor cells with PureLink™ Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Multiplex PCR was performed using the GeneAmp PCR system 9700 (ABI) using a previously reported method (Ko et al., 2019). PCR products were analyzed using a DNA sequencer (ABI 3730xl; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and microsatellite analysis was conducted using GeneSMapper version 4 (ABI). Microsatellite markers, such as FH2537, FH3005, FH3372, FH3116, REN51C16, REN2770O5, FH2834, REN204K13, FH2097, FH2712, and FH2998, were selected according to previous studies [47,48].

5.4. Hematological and Biochemical Analysis of Blood

Blood samples were collected from each dog via jugular venipuncture. For complete blood count (CBC) measurement, blood samples were collected into EDTA-containing tubes, and leukocytes, erythrocytes, and thrombocyte were counted using an automated hematology cell counter (MS9-5V; Melet Schloesing Lab, Osny France). To assess kidney, liver, and heart functions, we performed blood chemistry analysis using a bench-top dry chemistry analyzer (Vettest 8008 Chemistry Analyzer; IDEXX Lab, Chalfont St Peter, United Kingdom), in which creatinine, glucose, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), albumin, total bilirubin, total protein (TP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase, cholesterol, and amylase levels were determined.

5.5. X-ray and CT Imaging

X-ray and CT imaging were performed using a two-channel multi-detector row CT scanner (Somatom Emotion, Siemens Medical System, Erlangen, Germany). For CT scanning, the animals were anesthetized by inhalation of 2% isoflurane, and CT was performed at 110 kV, 36 mAs, and 1 mm slice thickness. Datasets were transferred to a separate workstation, and the volume and size of the vertebral window by pediculectomy for each site were measured using the Lucion software (Infinitt Technology, Seoul, Korea).

5.6. Karyotype Analysis

For chromosome analysis, peripheral blood samples were added to RPMI media (1640; Gibco, Rockville, MD, USA) supplemented with FBS and phytohemagglutinin, and cultured overnight into CO2 incubator at 37 °C. The blood cells were arrested in metaphase by adding 0.1 µg/mL of colcemid for 1 h, and then harvested using 0.25% trypsin/EDTA solution. The single-cell suspension was incubated in hypotonic solution buffer (0.075 M KCl) for 45 min and fixed with methanol-acetic acid (3:1). After fixation, condensed chromosomes were spread on pre-cleaned glass slides and stained with Giemsa solution. Karyotyping of cultured cells was performed using standard cytogenetic techniques, revealing a female chromosomal constitution of 2n = 78, XY.

5.7. Whole-Genome Sequencing, Sequence Mapping, and Variant Calling

Blood samples were collected from the normal phenotype group (original dog, NT-2, and NT-4) and the brachygnathia inferior group (NT-1 and NT-3), and genomic DNA was extracted using the TruSeq Nano DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Skewer software (v0.2.2) was used for adapter trimmer, and BWA (v0.7.15) were used for aligning the collected sequence data to the canine reference genome (CanFam 3.1). The Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK, v2.3.9Lite) was used for improvement of alignment errors and genotype calling and refining with default parameters. SNP-calling procedure was performed to discover SNPs using SAM tools (v.1.3.1). The detected SNPs were then annotated to functional categories using SnpEff software (v4.3a).

5.8. Predictive Functional and Interaction Analyses of Brachygnathia Inferior Candidate Genes

To validate the basic biological function of brachygnathia inferior candidate genes, we mapped a list of genes to the biological process (BP) of Gene Ontology (GO) in the DAVID database (v.6.8, accessed on 1 January 2019, http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov). Significantly enriched GOBP categories of brachygnathia inferior candidate genes were determined by the enrichment p-value. Signaling pathway enrichment analysis was performed using PANTHER pathway analysis tools (v.14.0, accessed on 1 January 2019, http://pantherdb.org). The signaling pathway of brachygnathia inferior candidate genes was determined by the number of genes mapped on each pathway and the percentage of enriched gene number against the total number of each pathway component genes.
To analyze the gene-to-gene functional correlation of brachygnathia inferior candidate genes, we constructed an interaction network using Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Proteins (STRING, accessed on 1 January 2019, http://string-db.org).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23010475/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, manuscript writing, review, and editing, S.A.O.; project administration, funding acquisition, conceptualization, and veterinary treatment, T.-Y.H.; assembly of data, manuscript writing, and veterinary diagnosis, Y.-h.C. and S.-L.L.; dog cloning and veterinary treatment, S.L., H.J. and J.-G.N.; WGS analysis, D.L.; microsatellites for paternity test, B.-H.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (project no. PJ01092801), RDA, Republic of Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Center for Biomedical Experimentation at the National Institute of Animal Science of the Rural Development Administration (approval number 2015-143).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

SCNTSomatic cell nuclear transfer
CTComputed tomography
WGSWhole-genome sequencing
WntWingless-related integration site
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
NTNuclear transfer
SMDSurrogate mother dogs
CBCComplete blood count
RBCRed blood cell
MCVMean corpuscular volume
MCHMean corpuscular hemoglobin
MCHCMean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
PDWPlatelet distribution width
WBCWhite blood cell
MPVMean platelet volume
RDWRed cell distribution width
PCTPlateletcrit
BUNBlood urea nitrogen
GGTGamma-glutamyl transferase
ALBAlbumin
TBTotal bilirubin
TPTotal protein
ALTAlanine aminotransferase
ASTAspartate aminotransferase
SNVsSingle nucleotide variations
IndelsInsertions/deletions
GOGene Ontology
PANTHERProtein analysis through evolutionary relationships
DAVIDDatabase for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery
GnRHGonadotropin-releasing hormone
STRINGSearch tool for the retrieval of interacting genes/proteins
PCPPlanar cell polarity
FBSFetal bovine serum
BPBiological process

References

  1. Lee, B.C.; Kim, M.K.; Jang, G.; Oh, H.J.; Yuda, F.; Kim, H.J.; Shamim, M.H.; Kim, J.J.; Kang, S.K.; Schatten, G.; et al. Developmemtal technology: Dogs cloned from adult somatic cells. Nature 2005, 436, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Keefer, C.L.; Baldassarre, H.; Keyston, R.; Wang, B.; Bhatia, B.; Bilodeau, A.S.; Zhou, J.F.; Leduc, M.; Downey, B.R.; Lazaris, A.; et al. Generation of dwarf goat (Capra hircus) clones following nuclear transfer with transfected and nontransfected fetal fibroblasts and in vitro-matured oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 64, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Keefer, C.L. Artificial cloning of domestic animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 8874–8878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, M.J.; Oh, H.J.; Hwang, S.Y.; Hur, T.Y.; Lee, B.C. Health and temperaments of cloned working dogs. J. Vet. Sci. 2018, 19, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, M.J.; Oh, H.J.; Kim, G.A.; Setyawan, E.M.N.; Choi, Y.B.; Lee, S.H.; Petersen-Jones, S.M.; Ko, C.M.J.; Lee, B.C. Birth of clones of the world’s first cloned dog. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lee, S.; Zhao, M.; No, J.; Nam, Y.; Im, G.S.; Hur, T.Y. Dog cloning with in vivo matured oocytes obtained using electric chemiluminescence immunoassay-predicted ovulation method. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kim, H.M.; Cho, Y.S.; Kim, H.; Jho, S.; Son, B.; Choi, J.Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, B.C.; Bhak, J.; Jang, G. Whole genome comparison of donor and cloned dogs. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Sousa, P.A.; King, T.; Harkness, L.; Young, L.E.; Walker, S.K.; Wilmut, I. Evaluation of gestational deficiencies in cloned sheep fetuses and placentae. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 65, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Hill, J.R.; Burghardt, R.C.; Jones, K.; Long, C.R.; Looney, C.R.; Shin, T.; Spencer, T.E.; Thompson, J.A.; Winger, Q.A.; Westhusin, M.E. Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first-trimester somatic cell cloned bovine fetuses. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63, 1787–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Eriksen, T.; Ganter, M.; Distl, O.; Staszyk, C. Cranial morphology in the brachygnathic sheep. BMC Vet. Res. 2016, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shatab, M.S.; Kumar, N.; Singh, M.; Kumar, S.; Seckhon, M.S.; Dhindsa, S.S. Brachygnathia (parrot mouth) inferior calf in a murrah buffalo. Buffalo Bull. 2018, 37, 101–103. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dierks, C.; Hoffmann, H.; Heinrich, F.; Hellige, M.; Hewicker-Trautwein, M.; Distl, O. Suspected X-linked facial dysmorphia and growth retardation in related labrador retriever puppies. Vet. J. 2017, 220, 48–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yin, R.; Kwoh, C.K.; Zheng, J. Whole genome sequencing analysis: Computational pipelines and workflows in bioinformatics. In Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology: ABC of Bioinformatics; Shoba, R., Gribskov, M., Nakai, K., Christian, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterda, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 3, pp. 176–183. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilmut, I.; Schnieke, A.E.; McWhir, J.; Kind, A.J.; Campbell, K.H.S. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997, 385, 810–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wakayama, T.; Perry, A.C.F.; Zuccotti, M.; Johnson, K.R.; Yanagimachi, R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 1998, 394, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kato, Y.; Tani, T.; Sotomaru, Y.; Kurokawa, K.; Kato, J.Y.; Doguchi, H.; Yasue, H.; Tsunoda, Y. Eight calves cloned from somatic cells of a single adult. Science 1998, 282, 2095–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Baguisi, A.; Behboodi, E.; Melican, D.T.; Pollock, J.S.; Destrempes, M.M.; Cammuso, C.; Williams, J.L.; Nims, S.D.; Porter, C.A.; Midura, P.; et al. Production of goats by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17, 456–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Polejaeva, I.A.; Chen, S.H.; Vaught, T.D.; Page, R.L.; Mullins, J.; Ball, S.; Dai, Y.; Boone, J.; Walker, S.; Ayares, D.L.; et al. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000, 407, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kim, M.J.; Oh, H.J.; Kim, G.A.; Jo, Y.K.; Choi, J.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, H.Y.; Kim, H.W.; Choi, M.C.; Lee, B.C. Reduced birth weight, cleft palate and preputial abnormalities in a cloned dog. Acta Vet. Scand. 2014, 56, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Tanaka, S.; Oda, M.; Toyoshima, Y.; Wakayama, T.; Tanaka, M.; Hattori, N.; Yoshida, N.; Ohgane, J.; Yanagimachi, R.; Shiota, K. Placentomegaly in cloned mouse concepti caused by expansion of the spongiotrophoblast layer. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 65, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dean, W.; Santos, F.; Stojkovic, M.; Zakhartchenko, V.; Walter, J.; Wolf, E.; Reik, W. Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: Aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13734–13738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Gouveia, C.; Huyser, C.; Egli, D.; Pepper, M.S. Lessons learned from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yanagimachi, R. Cloning: Experience from the mouse and other animals. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2002, 187, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Iannuzzi, L.; PiaDiMeo, G.; Leifsson, P.S.; Eggen, A.; Christensen, K. A case of trisomy 28 in cattle revealed by both banding and FISH-mapping techniques. Hereditas 2001, 134, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mayr, B.; Krutzler, H.; Auer, H.; Schleger, W.; Sasshofer, K.; Glawischig, E. A viable calf with trisomy 22. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 1985, 39, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schwarzenbacher, H.; Wurmser, C.; Flisikowski, K.; Misurova, L.; Jung, S.; Langenmayer, M.C.; Schnieke, A.; Knubben-Schweizer, G.; Fries, R.; Pausch, H. A frameshift mutation in GON4L is associated with proportionate dwarfism in Fleckvieh cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2016, 48, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Woolley, S.A.; Hayes, S.E.; Shariflou, M.R.; Nicholas, F.W.; Willet, C.E.; O’Rourke, B.A.; Tammen, I. Molecular basis of a new ovine model for human 3M syndrome-2. BMC Genet. 2020, 21, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Thompson, K.G.; Piripi, S.A.; Dittmer, K.E. Inherited abnormalities of skeletal development in sheep. Vet. J. 2008, 177, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wolf, Z.T.; Leslie, E.J.; Arzi, B.; Jayashankar, K.; Karmi, N.; Jia, Z.; Rowland, D.J.; Young, A.; Safra, N.; Sliskovic, S.; et al. A LINE-1 insertion in DLX6 is responsible for cleft palate and mandibular abnormalities in a canine model of pierre robin sequence. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Schoenebeck, J.J.; Hutchinson, S.A.; Byers, A.; Beale, H.C.; Carrington, B.; Faden, D.L.; Rimbault, M.; Decker, B.; Kidd, J.M.; Sood, R.; et al. Variation of BMP3 contributes to dog breed skull diversity. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dashti, M.J.S.; Gamieldien, J. A practical guide to filtering and prioritizing genetic variants. Biotechniques 2017, 62, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Cadigan, K.M.; Nusse, R. Wnt signaling: A common theme in animal development. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 3286–3305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Brault, V.; Moore, R.; Kutsch, S.; Ishibashi, M.; Rowitch, D.H.; McMahon, A.P.; Sommer, L.; Boussadia, O.; Kemler, R. Inactivation of the β-catenin gene by Wnt1-Cre-mediated deletion results in dramatic brain malformation and failure of craniofacial development. Development 2001, 128, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Acebron, S.P.; Niehrs, C. β-catenin-independent roles of Wnt/LRP6 signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 956–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Nusse, R.; Clevers, H. Wnt/β-catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell 2017, 169, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Haseeb, M.; Pirzada, R.H.; Ain, Q.U.; Choi, S. Wnt signaling in the regulation of immune cell and cancer therapeutics. Cells 2019, 8, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bonnans, C.; Flacelière, M.; Grillet, F.; Dantec, C.; Desvignes, J.P.; Pannequin, J.; Severac, D.; Dubois, E.; Bibeau, F.; Escriou, V.; et al. Essential requirement for β-arrestin2 in mouse intestinal tumors with elevated Wnt signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3047–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wen, J.; Chiang, Y.J.; Gao, C.; Xue, H.; Xu, J.; Ning, Y.; Hodes, R.J.; Gao, X.; Chen, Y.G. Loss of Dact1 disrupts planar cell polarity signaling by altering dishevelled activity and leads to posterior malformation in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 11023–11030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yin, X.; Xiang, T.; Li, L.L.; Su, X.; Shu, X.; Luo, X.; Huang, J.; Yuan, Y.; Peng, W.; Oberst, M.; et al. DACT1, an antagonist to Wnt/β-catenin signaling, suppresses tumor cell growth and is frequently silenced in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yang, Y.; Topol, L.; Lee, H.; Wu, J. Wnt5a and Wnt5b exhibit distinct activities in coordinating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development 2003, 130, 1003–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Suthon, S.; Perkins, R.S.; Bryja, V.; Miranda-Carboni, G.A.; Krum, S.A. WNT5B in physiology and disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kawaguchi, J.; Azuma, Y.; Hoshi, K.; Kii, I.; Takeshita, S.; Ohta, T.; Ozawa, H.; Takeichi, M.; Chisaka, O.; Kudo, A. Targeted disruption of cadherin-11 leads to a reduction in bone density in calvaria and long bone metaphyses. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2001, 16, 1265–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aberle, H.; Schwartz, H.; Kemler, R. Cadherin-catenin complex: Protein interactions and their implications for cadherin function. J. Cell. Biochem. 1996, 61, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hagman, R.; Rönnberg, E.; Pejler, G. Canine uterine bacterial infection induces upregulation of proteolysis-related genes and downregulation of homeobox and zinc finger factors. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e8039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hansis, C.; Barreto, G.; Maltry, N.; Niehrs, C. Nuclear reprogramming of human somatic cells by xenopus egg extract requires BRG1. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14, 1475–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bui, H.T.; Wakayama, S.; Kishigami, S.; Kim, J.H.; Van Thuan, N.; Wakayama, T. The cytoplasm of mouse germinal vesicle stage oocytes can enhance somatic cell nuclear reprogramming. Development 2008, 135, 3935–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Ko, M.; Kwon, S. Genomic polymorphism analysis using microsatellites in the jeju dogs. J. Life Sci. 2019, 29, 637–644. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim, S.; Jang, H.; Kim, L.; Lim, D.; Lee, S.; Cho, Y.; Kim, T.; Seong, H.; Oh, S.; Choi, B. Paternity diagnosis using the multiplex PCR with microsatellite markers in dogs. Reprod. Dev. Biol. 2011, 35, 399–405. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 23 00475 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic description of the dog cloning process via somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), showing the descendant pedigree and phenotype of offspring. Donor cells were collected from a 5-year-old male German shepherd dog (original donor). NT refers to the cloned offspring produced via SCNT. Red colors (NT-1 and NT-2) were represented cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior.
Figure 1. Schematic description of the dog cloning process via somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), showing the descendant pedigree and phenotype of offspring. Donor cells were collected from a 5-year-old male German shepherd dog (original donor). NT refers to the cloned offspring produced via SCNT. Red colors (NT-1 and NT-2) were represented cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior.
Ijms 23 00475 g001
Ijms 23 00475 g002 550
Figure 2. Clinical diagnosis of cloned dogs. (A) Visual inspection of mandibular malocclusion in the cloned dogs. (i) A cloned dog without brachygnathia inferior (NT-2); (ii) a cloned dog with brachygnathia inferior (NT-1). Arrows indicate the lower jaw with (red) and without (white) brachygnathia inferior. (B) Craniofacial radiographic images of the cloned dogs. Left column, the original dog as a control; central column, a cloned dog without brachygnathia inferior (NT-2); right column, a cloned dog with brachygnathia inferior (NT-1). (i,ii) are shown in the dorsoventral and lateral view of their craniofacial profile, respectively. White dotted lines in (i) indicate the central axis of the skull in the dorsoventral view of the craniofacial profile. The cross of white and yellow dotted lines in (ii) indicate the craniofacial angle between the maxilla and mandible. (C) Three-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography images. Left, the original dog as a control; center, a cloned dog without brachygnathia inferior (NT-2); right, a cloned dog with brachygnathia inferior (NT-1). Red and yellow asterisks indicate the maxillary and mandible canines, respectively.
Figure 2. Clinical diagnosis of cloned dogs. (A) Visual inspection of mandibular malocclusion in the cloned dogs. (i) A cloned dog without brachygnathia inferior (NT-2); (ii) a cloned dog with brachygnathia inferior (NT-1). Arrows indicate the lower jaw with (red) and without (white) brachygnathia inferior. (B) Craniofacial radiographic images of the cloned dogs. Left column, the original dog as a control; central column, a cloned dog without brachygnathia inferior (NT-2); right column, a cloned dog with brachygnathia inferior (NT-1). (i,ii) are shown in the dorsoventral and lateral view of their craniofacial profile, respectively. White dotted lines in (i) indicate the central axis of the skull in the dorsoventral view of the craniofacial profile. The cross of white and yellow dotted lines in (ii) indicate the craniofacial angle between the maxilla and mandible. (C) Three-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography images. Left, the original dog as a control; center, a cloned dog without brachygnathia inferior (NT-2); right, a cloned dog with brachygnathia inferior (NT-1). Red and yellow asterisks indicate the maxillary and mandible canines, respectively.
Ijms 23 00475 g002
Ijms 23 00475 g003 550
Figure 3. Karyotyping in cloned dogs. Karyotyping was performed using peripheral blood samples from the dogs. The normal diploid chromosome number for dogs is 78, with the autosomes acrocentric, whereas the X and Y chromosomes are the large and small submetacentric chromosomes, respectively. (A,B) Dogs with and without brachygnathia inferior, respectively. Aa and Ab represent the original dog (as control, donor) and the cloned dog, respectively. All dogs were male and had a normal number of chromosomes.
Figure 3. Karyotyping in cloned dogs. Karyotyping was performed using peripheral blood samples from the dogs. The normal diploid chromosome number for dogs is 78, with the autosomes acrocentric, whereas the X and Y chromosomes are the large and small submetacentric chromosomes, respectively. (A,B) Dogs with and without brachygnathia inferior, respectively. Aa and Ab represent the original dog (as control, donor) and the cloned dog, respectively. All dogs were male and had a normal number of chromosomes.
Ijms 23 00475 g003
Ijms 23 00475 g004 550
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequences between the original dog (donor) and cloned dogs. (A) Circos plot comparing variants in genome sequence between the cloned dogs with (NT-1 and -3) and without brachygnathia inferior (original dog, NT-2 and -4). From the outside, each layer indicates reference chromosomes, the number of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) (blue: normal, red: affected), and the number of insertions and deletions (indels) (green, normal; orange, affected). The black bar represents the differences between the normal and affected samples. (B) Venn diagram of specific variants between the dogs with (ii) and without (i) brachygnathia inferior.
Figure 4. Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequences between the original dog (donor) and cloned dogs. (A) Circos plot comparing variants in genome sequence between the cloned dogs with (NT-1 and -3) and without brachygnathia inferior (original dog, NT-2 and -4). From the outside, each layer indicates reference chromosomes, the number of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) (blue: normal, red: affected), and the number of insertions and deletions (indels) (green, normal; orange, affected). The black bar represents the differences between the normal and affected samples. (B) Venn diagram of specific variants between the dogs with (ii) and without (i) brachygnathia inferior.
Ijms 23 00475 g004
Ijms 23 00475 g005 550
Figure 5. Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis and Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER, v.14.0, 1 January 2019, http://pantherdb.org). The 3164 genes with specific variants found in cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior were included in these analyses. (A) Classification of 1471 genes according to the GO biological process using Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, v.6.8, 1 January 2019, http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov). (i,ii) The categories and bar plots of the GO biological processes, respectively. The red lines in “a” represent GO categories that participate in the development process. The p-values of each process were converted to −log10 P to calculate the enrichment score. (B) Mapping of 1913 genes via PANTHER. Relative gradient violet color represents the percentage of the enriched gene number relative to the total number of each pathway component gene. The bar plot displays the number of enriched genes. Venn diagrams in (C,D) represent the number of overlapping genes of the top-four most enriched pathways (i–iv) and the common and different gene list between the top-two gene pathways (ii,iii), respectively. (i–iv) Integrin (i), Wnt (ii) and cadherin (iii) signaling pathways, and the GnRH receptor pathway (iv).
Figure 5. Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis and Protein Analysis Through Evolutionary Relationships (PANTHER, v.14.0, 1 January 2019, http://pantherdb.org). The 3164 genes with specific variants found in cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior were included in these analyses. (A) Classification of 1471 genes according to the GO biological process using Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID, v.6.8, 1 January 2019, http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov). (i,ii) The categories and bar plots of the GO biological processes, respectively. The red lines in “a” represent GO categories that participate in the development process. The p-values of each process were converted to −log10 P to calculate the enrichment score. (B) Mapping of 1913 genes via PANTHER. Relative gradient violet color represents the percentage of the enriched gene number relative to the total number of each pathway component gene. The bar plot displays the number of enriched genes. Venn diagrams in (C,D) represent the number of overlapping genes of the top-four most enriched pathways (i–iv) and the common and different gene list between the top-two gene pathways (ii,iii), respectively. (i–iv) Integrin (i), Wnt (ii) and cadherin (iii) signaling pathways, and the GnRH receptor pathway (iv).
Ijms 23 00475 g005
Ijms 23 00475 g006 550
Figure 6. Interactive network of candidate genes for brachygnathia inferior. Each edge indicates interaction between two genes. The interaction types and their effects are described in the figure. This analysis was performed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database. Yellow and red letters indicate genes involved in the Wnt and cadherin pathways, respectively.
Figure 6. Interactive network of candidate genes for brachygnathia inferior. Each edge indicates interaction between two genes. The interaction types and their effects are described in the figure. This analysis was performed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database. Yellow and red letters indicate genes involved in the Wnt and cadherin pathways, respectively.
Ijms 23 00475 g006
Table
Table 1. Matching of microsatellite of between donor cells and cloned offspring.
Table 1. Matching of microsatellite of between donor cells and cloned offspring.
SourceFH2537FH3005FH3372FH3116REN51C16REN2770O5FH2834REN204K13FH2097FH2712FH2998
Donor cells146146224224154158190190255259333333265265248248284288174174208228
NT-1146146224224154158190190255259333333265265248248284288174174208228
NT-2146146224224154158190190255259333333265265248248284288174174208228
NT-3146146224224154158190190255259333333265265248248284288174174208228
NT-4146146224224154158190190255259333333265265248248284288174174208228
Donor cells used for nuclear transfer (NT); cloned offsprings (NT-1 to NT-4) were produced by NT.
Table
Table 2. The values of complete blood counts for original donor and cloned dogs.
Table 2. The values of complete blood counts for original donor and cloned dogs.
Parameters (Unit)Original Dog
(Donor Cells)		Brachygnathia Inferior
withoutwith
NT2NT4NT-1
RBC (1012/L)8.855.96.747.43
Hematocrit [Hct] (%)56.737.741.248.1
Hemoglobin [Hb] (g/dL)19.612.114.315.8
MCV (fL)64.163.961.164.7
MCH (pg)22.120.521.221.3
MCHC (g/dL)34.632.134.732.8
PDW (%)20.218.719.518.9
Reticulocyte (%)0.21.80.51.1
Reticulocyte (103/uL)18.610830.381.7
WBC (109/L)13.815.719.213.86
WBC-Neut (%)70.656.964.660
WBC-Lymph (%)15.329.524.925.2
WBC-Mono (%)7.88.38.77
WBC-Eos (%)6.25.21.77.8
WBC-Baso (%)0.10.10.10
WBC-Neut (109/L)9.758.9412.48.32
WBC-Lymph (109/L)2.114.634.763.49
WBC-Mono (109/L)1.081.311.660.97
WBC-Eos (109/L)0.850.810.331.08
WBC-Baso (109/L)0.010.010.020
Platelet (109/L)201411325429
MPV (fL) 12.313.113.1
RDW (fL) 19.3618.818.8
PCT (%) 0.50.560.56
RBC, red blood cell; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; PDW, platelet distribution width; WBC, white blood cell; MPV, mean platelet volume; RDW, red cell distribution width; PCT, plateletcrit.
Table
Table 3. The values of blood chemistry parameters of original donor and cloned dogs.
Table 3. The values of blood chemistry parameters of original donor and cloned dogs.
Parameters (Unit)Original Dog
(Donor Cells)		Brachygnathia Inferior
withoutwith
NT2NT4NT-1NT-3
Glucose (mg/dL)68311046290
BUN (mg/dL)131319134
Creatinine (mg/dL)1.210.71.10.3
BUN: Creatinine (Ratio)1113251112
Phosphorus-Inorganic (mg/dL)388.75.78.3
Calcium (mg/dL)10.8119.910.911
Protein-Total (g/dL)7.85.757.16.1
Albumin (g/dL)42.92.73.42.9
Globulin (g/dL)3.82.82.33.73.2
A/G ratio1.11.11.20.90.9
ALT (U/L)4722182367
ALKP (U/L)17173151106216
GGT (U/L)00208
Bilirubin-Total (mg/dL)0.20.10.10.10.7
Cholesterol-Total (mg/dL)191119171170237
Amylase (U/L)727539299863323
Lipase (U/L)34133135232293
Na+ (mmol/L)153150147151140.9
K+ (mmol/L)4.255.74.35.05
Na+:K+ (Ratio)3630263623.5
Cl− (mmol/L)110107107107111.3
Osmorality301294296297
BUN, blood urea nitrogen; A/G ratio, the ratio of albumin and globulin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALKP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase.
Table
Table 4. Variants found in WNT/cadherin signaling pathway in cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior.
Table 4. Variants found in WNT/cadherin signaling pathway in cloned dogs with brachygnathia inferior.
#Gene Symbol
(Gene Name)		Variant Information
CHRPOSREFALTSPutative
Impact		Genotype
Without
Brachygnathia Inferior		With
Brachygnathia Inferior
Original DogNT-2NT-4NT-1NT-3
1ARRB2
(arrestin beta 2)		531834580TG+ MOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2CCND1
(G1/S-specific cyclin-D1)		1848505585GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
48511836TTGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
3CDH3
(cadherin 3)		580888237CGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
80917292ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
4CDH7
(cadherin 7)		111751189CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
11765372CATATATATATATATATATCMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
5CDH8
(cadherin 8)		586401758ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
86708399CAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
86742629CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
86745597TTATACACMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
87225311TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
87225313TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
85863919ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
86114270CCTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
86222689TGMOD0/00/10/01/11/1
86296806CGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
86390011TACCCCTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
6CDH9
(cadherin 9)		478675775ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
78830300ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
78840862TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
79012127GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
7CDH10
(cadherin 10)		481023137TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
81051478ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
80613492GTCGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
80892138GTGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
80904036ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
8CDH11
(cadherin 11)		584404903AAGAGAAGAGAG,AMOD0/00/00/00/20/2
84473862CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
9CDH12
(cadherin 12)		482754279TTATATATAGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
82856048CAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82947779GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
83011986CCGTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
83066202GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
83101151CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
81762398TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
81811393TTGAAATMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
81895595GCMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
81895601CAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
81934549TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
81942964ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82120066AGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82213787ATAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82245479CCTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82346773TGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
82391279GTGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82427446TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82427448TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82567248GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82591151CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
82672898TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
10CDH13
(cadherin 13)		568789330GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
69134746GTGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
11CDH17
(cadherin 17)		2938980475ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
38980931CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
12CDH18
(cadherin 18)		484572993GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
84609771ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
84777718CTCMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
84815886CTCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
84845137ATAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
84917669TTAT,TTATAMOD0/20/20/22/22/2
85340830GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
13CDH19
(cadherin 19)		111213176ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
11219146TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
11302080TTAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
14CDH20
(cadherin 20)		115018520CTTTTTTTTTTTTTCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
15026159CGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
15385740CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
15397278CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
15CDH23
(cadherin 23)		422217920ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
22268845GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
22296573ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
22308343GCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
22521773TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
16CHD1L
(chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1-like)		1757755822ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
57801618CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
17CTNND2
(catenin delta 2)		342587961CGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2605251CCAGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
2683554CCTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
2729501CGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2790163CAGCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2887443GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2926914GAGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
3386604TTTTCMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
1984298CAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2045599AAGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
2211983TTACACACMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
2325817TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2340793CGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
2420433TAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
2420448GAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
18DACT1
(Dishevelled binding antagonist of beta catenin 1)		833957483GAHIGH0/00/00/00/10/1
33957480CTLOW0/00/00/00/10/1
19EN1
(engrailed homeobox 1)		1931181296TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
31191156TATMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
20ERBB4
(Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4)		3719286254TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
19629719CCTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
19767395TTTCTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
20133592TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
21FBXW11
(F-box and WD repeat domain-containing 11)		440367311CTCMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
40278734TTAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
40314614CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
22FYN
(tyrosine-protein kinase)		1268231298ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
68274356TTTAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
23FZD4
(frizzled class receptor 4)		2112700289GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
24FZD8
(frizzled class receptor 8)		21329228TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
1333216TATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
25INO80
(INO80 complex ATPase subunit)		308165408ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
8165412ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
8165416ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
8206520TATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
26ITPR2
(inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 2)		2720831508AAGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
20872227ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
27MAP3K7
(mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7)		1249749924AATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
49769002CCTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
28PCDH10
(protocadherin 10)		198973713TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
9008967GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
9157583CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
29PCDH11X
(protocadherin-11 X-linked)		X68666259GCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
68746381GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
30PCDH15
(protocadherin-related 15)		2634702015TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
35097300TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
33646637GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
33672867TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
33672897GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
31PCDH18
(protocadherin 18)		195101338GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
5101376GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
32PCDH19
(protocadherin 19)		X74412666TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
74418677GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
74250517CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
74256962GAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
74260225GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
33PCDH7
(protocadherin 7)		380140770TAAATMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
80356304GGAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
79602331TTGAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
79874335TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
79951643GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
34PCDH9
(protocadherin 9)		2222259657CACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
22267695CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
20900771TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
21327589TTAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
21447120CAGCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
21629025TAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
21682718TATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
21741598GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
21855444TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
21977854GGAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
35PLCB1
(phospholipase C beta 4)		2413687020CTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
13703533CCCTCACACACACMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
13506621ATAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
13545968CAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
36PLCB4
(phospholipase C beta 4)		2413106067GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
13222123CCTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
37PPP3CC
(protein phosphatase 3 catalytic subunit gamma)		2534764968TATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
34812396TATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
38PRKCA
(protein kinase C alpha)		913673919TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
13871044TAAT,TAMOD0/10/10/10/21/2
13872388GGCMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
13906274GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
13963246GGTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
13987502GAGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
39PRKCE
(protein kinase C epsilon type)		1048018924GGTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
48021663GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
48362949ATMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
48362950ATMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
48362951ATMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
48452967ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
40PRKCH
(protein kinase C epsilon)		836326004ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
36445470CAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
41PRKCQ
(protein kinase C theta)		229254232CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
29254236CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
29246453CCAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
42TBL1X
(transducin beta like 1 X-linke)		X6446386TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
6446390TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
43TBXT
(T-box transcription factor T)		153860297TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
53860299TGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
53916908GCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
54140252GAMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
44TCF7L2
(transcription factor 7 like 2)		2823954797ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
23973312CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
24061992CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
45TLE1
(TLE family member 1, transcriptional corepressor)		177969485GGTMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
78272418ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
77521907AATMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
77529973CATATCMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
46WNT5B
(Wnt family member 5B)		2743705981ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
43718076ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
47ENSCAFG000000081151744082433CTTTTTTC,CTTTTMOD0/20/20/20/10/1
44366744TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
44392169CAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
48CTNNA3
(catenin alpha 3)		417723198CCTCTGMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
18058494TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
18069599CTCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
16891381CACMOD0/10/10/11/11/1
16989930GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
16989932ATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
17291872TATMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
49ENSCAFG00000023180X99421688GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421696GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421697GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421711GCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421728TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421731GTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421735CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421993CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99421995CTMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99422007CGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
99422009ACMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
50LOC489647
(cadherin-1-like)		563556214GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
63556216GAMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
63556219CGMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
63556227TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
63556230TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
63556233TCMOD0/00/00/00/10/1
CHR = chromosome, POS = position (genomic coordinate), REF = reference allele, ALT = alternative allele, + MOD = moderate.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choe, Y.-h.; Hur, T.-Y.; Lee, S.-L.; Lee, S.; Lim, D.; Choi, B.-H.; Jeong, H.; No, J.-G.; Ock, S.A. Brachygnathia Inferior in Cloned Dogs Is Possibly Correlated with Variants of Wnt Signaling Pathway Initiators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010475

AMA Style

Choe Y-h, Hur T-Y, Lee S-L, Lee S, Lim D, Choi B-H, Jeong H, No J-G, Ock SA. Brachygnathia Inferior in Cloned Dogs Is Possibly Correlated with Variants of Wnt Signaling Pathway Initiators. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(1):475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choe, Yong-ho, Tai-Young Hur, Sung-Lim Lee, Seunghoon Lee, Dajeong Lim, Bong-Hwan Choi, Haeyun Jeong, Jin-Gu No, and Sun A Ock. 2022. "Brachygnathia Inferior in Cloned Dogs Is Possibly Correlated with Variants of Wnt Signaling Pathway Initiators" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 1: 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010475

APA Style

Choe, Y. -h., Hur, T. -Y., Lee, S. -L., Lee, S., Lim, D., Choi, B. -H., Jeong, H., No, J. -G., & Ock, S. A. (2022). Brachygnathia Inferior in Cloned Dogs Is Possibly Correlated with Variants of Wnt Signaling Pathway Initiators. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(1), 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop