Next Article in Journal
Etiology of IBD—Is It Still a Mystery?
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Association Analysis for Hybrid Breeding in Wheat
Previous Article in Journal
Modification of Regulatory T Cell Epitopes Promotes Effector T Cell Responses to Aspartyl/Asparaginyl β-Hydroxylase
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification of DOF Gene Family and the Mechanism Dissection of SbDof21 Regulating Starch Biosynthesis in Sorghum
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms232012442
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mapping and Validation of BrGOLDEN: A Dominant Gene Regulating Carotenoid Accumulation in Brassica rapa

by
Lei Zhang
1,2,3,†,
Shifan Zhang
1,†,
Yun Dai
1,
Shaoxing Wang
1,2,
Chenggang Wang
2,
Fei Li
1,
Hui Zhang
1,
Guohu Chen
2,
Lingyun Yuan
2,
Jinfeng Hou
2,
Xiaoyan Tang
2,
Shidong Zhu
2,
Rifei Sun
1,
Guoliang Li
1,* and
Shujiang Zhang
1,*
1
Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
Vegetable Genetics and Breeding Laboratory, College of Horticulture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
3
Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (North China), Beijing Key Laboratory of Vegetable Germplasm Improvement, Beijing 100097, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12442; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012442
Submission received: 10 September 2022 / Revised: 7 October 2022 / Accepted: 13 October 2022 / Published: 18 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Genetics and Plant Breeding 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In plants, the accumulation of carotenoids can maintain the balance of the photosystem and improve crop nutritional quality. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms underlying carotenoid synthesis and accumulation should be further explored. In this study, carotenoid accumulation differed significantly among parental Brassica rapa. Genetic analysis was carried out using the golden inner leaf ‘1900264′ line and the light−yellow inner leaf ‘1900262′ line, showing that the golden inner leaf phenotype was controlled by a single dominant gene. Using bulked−segregant analysis sequencing, BraA09g007080.3C encoding the ORANGE protein was selected as a candidate gene. Sequence alignment revealed that a 4.67 kb long terminal repeat insertion in the third exon of the BrGOLDEN resulted in three alternatively spliced transcripts. The spatiotemporal expression results indicated that BrGOLDEN might regulate the expression levels of carotenoid−synthesis−related genes. After transforming BrGOLDEN into Arabidopsis thaliana, the seed−derived callus showed that BrGOLDENIns and BrGOLDENDel lines presented a yellow color and the BrGOLDENLdel line presented a transparent phenotype. In addition, using the yeast two−hybrid assay, BrGOLDENIns, BrGOLDENLdel, and Brgoldenwt exhibited strong interactions with BrPSY1, but BrGOLDENDel did not interact with BrPSY1 in the split−ubiquitin membrane system. In the secondary and 3D structure analysis, BrGOLDENDel was shown to have lost the PNFPSFIPFLPPL sequences at the 125 amino acid position, which resulted in the α−helices of BrGOLDENDel being disrupted, restricting the formation of the 3D structure and affecting the functions of the protein. These findings may provide new insights into the regulation of carotenoid synthesis in B. rapa.

1. Introduction

Carotenoids play a fundamental role in human nutrition by maintaining human health and mitigating a range of diseases [1]. They are derived from isoprenoids, the largest class of natural pigments in plants. To date, more than 750 natural carotenoid molecules have been identified from animals, plants, and microorganisms [2]. In plants, carotenoids protect the photosystem from damage by dissipating excess light energy released by the photosynthetic mechanism [3]. Carotenoids can also serve as precursors for the phytohormone strigolactone and abscisic acid biosynthesis [4,5,6,7]. In edible fleshy fruit, such as cantaloupe, melon, and citrus, carotenoid volatile derivatives affect the aroma and flavor [8]. Moreover, the activity of reactive oxygen species and free radicals can be inhibited by carotenoids to maintain cell structure and normal life activities [9]. Therefore, improving the carotenoid content in plants has attracted increasing attention, especially the content of carotenoids in fruit, vegetables, and grains, which are the main components in the human diet. In recent years, considerable details of the plant carotenoid biosynthetic pathway have been elucidated [10,11,12].
Carotenoids can be produced in all differentiated plastids and mainly accumulate in the chloroplasts of green tissues and chromoplasts of petals and fruit [13,14]. In plants, many core catalytic reaction genes and enzymes for carotenoid synthesis have been identified (Figure 7e) [2]. Carotenoids are formed from the condensation of the 5−carbon precursors isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate, which are produced via the plastidial 2−C−methyl−D−erythritol 4−phosphate (MEP) pathway in plastids [15]. The first committed step in the carotenoid pathway occurs when phytoene synthase (PSY) condenses two molecules of geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) to form 15−cis−phytoene [16]. PSY is considered the rate−limiting enzyme that determines carotenoid synthesis. 15−Cis−phytoene is transformed into trans−lycopene under the catalysis of phytoene desaturase (PDS) and ζ−carotene desaturase (ZDS). The next step can follow two paths: α−carotene is formed via lycopene ε−cyclase (ε−LCY) and β−carotene is formed via β−LCY [17,18,19,20]. Subsequently, α− and β−carotene are catalyzed by heme−containing cytochrome P450−type hydroxylases (CYP) and non−heme β−ring hydroxylases (BCH), respectively, to hydroxylate the distal ring structure to generate yellow lutein and zeaxanthin. Zeaxanthin can be epoxidized by zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) to produce violaxanthin, which can be reversed by violaxanthin de−epoxidase (VDE). This interconversion forms the xanthophyll cycle. Finally, neoxanthin is produced by neoxanthin synthase (NXS), completing the main biosynthetic pathway of carotenoids [21,22,23]. These carotenoids are indispensable for their role in catalyzing the production of strigolactone, caprolactone, β−citraurin, volatiles, and scents. Thus far, in Arabidopsis thaliana [24] and many horticultural plants, such as Daucus carota [25], Solanum lycopersicum [26,27], Solanum tuberosum [28], Capsicum annuum [29], and Brassica rapa [30], there has been great progress in the study of carotenoid metabolism.
Chinese cabbage (B. rapa) is a leafy vegetable belonging to the Brassica genus in the cruciferous family [31]. Its cultivated area and consumption rank first among all vegetables in China. The inner leaves of Chinese cabbage are rich in carotenoids, which are responsible for the diverse colors of Chinese cabbage leaves. The abnormal accumulation of carotenoids in Chinese cabbage with orange heads is mostly controlled by a series of recessive genes [32]. Matsumoto et al. (1998) developed rapid fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers for orange−yellow gene (Oy) pigmentation in Chinese cabbage and mapped Oy on linkage group 1. Genetic analysis has indicated that Oy is a recessive gene [33]. Using bulked segregant analysis (BSA)−seq and sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers, localization analysis of the orange inner leaf trait of Chinese cabbage was carried out and 110 Chinese cabbage samples were verified using the three developed SCAR markers. The candidate gene was located on the R9 linkage group [34]. Feng et al. (2012) used 600 individual plants from the F2 population to map and develop new markers closely related to the genes for the orange color on the inner leaves of Chinese cabbage. Using linkage analysis, a gene was located at the end of A09 and the distance between the markers syau19 and syau15 was found to be 4.6 cM [32]. In addition, the orange locus was finely mapped in the F2 S4 populations and ORF1, a candidate gene, encodes a carotenoid isomerase, involved in the isomerization of carotenoids. Sequencing analysis has revealed insertions/deletions in the ORF1 promoter region between the two parents. Therefore, CRTISO (carotene isomerase) is the most likely candidate gene for Bror [35]. Lee et al. (2014) found a mutation in a gene encoding CRTISO in an orange−colored Chinese cabbage and verified several molecular markers that could distinguish CRTISO genotypes. This was the first time that CRTISO has been identified as a candidate gene in the OC inner leaves of Chinese cabbage [36]. In subsequent studies, genetic analysis and fine mapping were conducted in the orange inner leaves of Chinese cabbage from different parents, indicating that BrCRTISO is a single recessive candidate gene. In the parental material, BrCRTISO has many Indels and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter and coding regions, resulting in orange inner leaves in Chinese cabbage [37,38,39].
To date, many recessive genes regulating carotenoid accumulation in B. rapa have been discovered, but no dominant gene controlling this trait has been found. In this study, BrGOLDEN, a dominant gene, was mapped and cloned to regulate carotenoid accumulation in B. rapa. Tri−crossed hybrid lines were constructed through hybridization between the B. rapa line with golden inner leaves and the non−golden highly inbred line. Carotenoid pigments were identified by high−performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in the leaves of different B. rapa lines. In addition, the promoter and coding sequences of the candidate genes were cloned and transformed into A. thaliana to verify their functions. The interaction proteins were screened by Yeast Two−Hybrid (Y2H), which revealed that PSY played an important role in regulating carotenoids and different transcripts of BrGOLDEN were selected. Meanwhile, quantitative real−time (qRT)−PCR was used to analyze the expression of the candidate genes and genes in the carotenoid regulation pathways, indicating how BrGOLDEN influences other genes. This study lays a foundation for the elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of carotenoid biosynthesis in the golden inner leaves of the B. rapa line, which may help determine the carotenoid regulation pathways.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotypic Evaluation and Genetic Analysis

Line ‘1900264′, a commercial B. rapa variety, is a male−sterile hybrid line (P1, called F1, parental information is unknown) with golden inner leaves (Figure 1a–c). Line ‘1900262′ (P2) is a highly inbred B. rapa line that has non−golden inner leaves and no significant carotenoid accumulation in the short stem tissue (Figure 1d–f). The morphology and growth of the two Chinese cabbage lines are similar in the seedling and rosette stages (Figure 1g–j). However, compared with line ‘1900264′, line ‘1900262′ is an early heading material, with a higher degree of heading and relatively curly leaves (Figure 1k,l). The tri−crossed hybrid lines were obtained through ‘1900264′ × ‘1900262′. Then, the inner leaf phenotypes of the tri−crossed hybrid line were investigated and counted and the golden and non−golden phenotypes conformed to a 1:1 segregation ratio at the Chi−squared test (χ2 test) level (Table 1). Therefore, the golden inner leaf phenotype was controlled by a pair of dominant nuclear genes, which was named BrGOLDEN. The phenotypic investigation also showed that the ‘golden circle’ appeared in Chinese cabbage with golden inner leaves; we speculate that the ‘golden circle’ in short stem tissue may be linked to the golden inner leaf phenotype (Figure 1a–f).

2.2. Comparison of Microstructure and the Carotenoid Component

The microstructures of the short stems and the inner leaves at the maturity stage were analyzed by observing microsection images of the ‘1900264′ and ‘1900262′ lines. In line ‘1900264′, more chromoplasts were aggregated in the xylem cells of the short stem, but fewer chromoplasts were produced in the parenchyma cells (Figure 2a) and, in the inner leaves, the golden chromoplasts were distributed around all cells (Figure 2c). However, this distribution of chromoplasts was not observed in the cells of the short stem and the inner leaves in the ‘1900262′ line, whose inner leaves were the non−golden phenotype (Figure 2b,d).
The protoplasts were separated from the short stem and inner leaf tissues of the parent lines and observed under a light microscope. Many chromoplasts were distributed in the short stem and inner leaf cells of the ‘1900264′ line (Figure 2e–g). Chromoplasts were not observed in the short stems of the non−golden inner leaves of the ‘1900262′ line, but a few chromoplasts were found in the protoplasts of the inner leaves (Figure 2h–j). This may be because the ‘1900262′ line has light yellow inner leaves and a low carotenoid content; thus, the presence of a few chromoplasts was observed. Thus, the chromoplasts contained in these cells may be related to the color of the short stems and the inner leaves in the golden B. rapa line.
To analyze the carotenoid compositions of the inner leaves, the 5 cm long inner leaves of the two parent lines (‘1900264′ and ‘1900262′ lines) at the mature stage were used to detect carotenoid components and content. Using the liquid chromatography−tandem mass spectrometry (LC−MS/MS) platform, 20 and 46 carotenoid components were subjected to absolute and relative quantification, respectively (Table S1). Among them, eight components were primarily detected and the contents of the other components were relatively low. Eight carotenoid components were detected. The total carotenoid content of the ‘1900264′ line was 3.3−times that of the ‘1900262′ line (Figure 3). Except for neoxanthin, violaxanthin, and antheraxanthin, the contents of the other five carotene components differed between the ‘1900264′ and ‘1900262′ lines. The ‘1900264′ line was rich in β−carotene and lutein, which accounted for 35.2% and 56.2% of the total carotenoid content, respectively. Compared with the ‘1900262′ line, the content of β−carotene increased by 13.6−fold. Interestingly, colorless (E/Z)−phytoene, as the upstream product of carotenoid biosynthesis [40], was detected only in the ‘1900264′ line.

2.3. Primary Mapping for the Golden Inner Leaf Phenotype by BSA−seq

The BSA method can rapidly identify markers linked to any specific gene or genomic region [41]. Forty golden and non−golden individuals were selected from the tri−crossed hybrid lines to construct the golden pool (GP) and non−golden pool (NGP), respectively. After resequencing, quality control, assembly, and alignment with the B. rapa reference genome V3.0 (http://brassicadb.org, accessed on 10 February 2021), the GP contained 179.87 Mb reads (98.39% coverage) and the NGP contained 180.56 Mb reads (98.41% coverage) (Table S2). Using association analysis of the Euclidean distance (ED) algorithm [42] and the △index algorithm [43], the intersection association area corresponding to all SNPs and Indels was obtained. Finally, BrGOLDEN was primarily located in the 2.2 Mb region of A09 (Figure 4).

2.4. Verifying the BrGOLDEN Candidate Gene

Based on the BSA−seq mapping results, the candidate region of 2.2 Mb was identified in combination with the B. rapa and A. thaliana databases. A total of 532 genes was annotated within the candidate region (Table S4). The BraA09g007080.3C at the anterior end of A09 was homologous to AT5G61670 (AtOR) in A. thaliana. In cauliflower, BoOR is a dominant gene regulating carotene accumulation [44]. Similar to AtOR, BraA09g007080.3 C contained a DnaJ−like zinc finger domain. In a previous study, AtOR interacted directly with PSY (phytoene synthase), which acts as a positive posttranscriptional regulator to control carotenoid biosynthesis [45,46]. Thus, BraA09g007080.3C is likely the candidate gene BrGOLDEN associated with inner leaf color.
To analyze the BraA09g007080.3C sequences of possible candidate genes in the ‘1900264′ and ‘1900262′ lines, the gDNA and CDS were amplified and sequenced using specific primers (Table S4). In line ‘1900262′, the gDNA of the Brgolden was 1648 bp, contained eight exons and seven introns, and two transcripts were obtained from it. Brgoldenwt was 918 bp and encoded a protein with 305 amino acids. BrgoldenLins (Lins, large insert transcript), with the second intron (61 bp) fully inserted, results in a frameshift mutation that prematurely terminates translation and, presumably, this transcript may be non−functional (Figure 5a). The reverse transcription (RT)−PCR results showed that Brgoldenwt was more abundant than BrgoldenLins in the ‘1900262′ line (Figure 5b). In line ‘1900264′, sequence analysis of BrGOLDEN showed that a large fragment of 4.67 kb was inserted at 558 bp and the insertion event led to the production of three alternative splicing transcripts. During the transcription process, only 21 bp remained at the 5′ end of the large insertion fragment. BrGOLDENIns (Ins, insert transcript) contained an additional 18 bp insertion in the third exon. BrGOLDENDel (Del, deletion transcript) contained a 39 bp deletion in the third exon and BrGOLDENLdel (Ldel, large deletion transcript) contained a 126 bp large deletion in the third and fourth exons (Figure 5a,c). The relative expression level of BrGOLDENDel was the most abundant in the ‘1900264′ line (Figure 5b). Amino acid sequence alignment showed that these transcripts were highly homologous and all contained four conserved C××C×××G motifs (Figure S1). Thus, we propose that BraA09g007080.3C is the candidate gene for golden and non−golden inner leaf color in Chinese cabbage.
The OR homologous gene BrGOLDEN in B. rapa was selected as a candidate gene for regulating carotenoid accumulation. OR is unique to plants and there were obvious differences among various plant families [44]. To analyze the evolutionary relationships of BrGOLDEN in horticultural crops, the sequences were aligned in different species. A highly conserved Cys−rich DnaJ domain was present in Cruciferae, Cucurbitaceae, and Solanaceae, among others. Phylogenetic analysis showed that B. rapa (BraA09g007080.3C) was most closely related to Brassica juncea, Brassica napus, Brassica oleracea, and Brassica carinata (Figure 6).

2.5. Relative Expression Level Analysis of BrGOLDEN and Carotenoid Synthesis Pathway Genes

To investigate whether BrGOLDEN promoted carotenoid accumulation by affecting the expression of carotenoid−synthesis genes, the relative expression levels were analyzed, including the BrGOLDEN/Brgolden and 12 carotenoid synthesis pathway genes (ZDS, CRTISO, VDE, LCYB, ZEP, DXS, PSY, GGPPS11.1, GGPPS11.2, BCH2, CYP97C1, and CYP97A3) (Figure 7e). The proteins encoded by these genes were extensively involved in carotenoid synthesis and catalytically produced carotenoid components were also significantly detected. RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA from four tissues (the outer leaves (OL), inner leaves (IL), short stems (S), and roots (R)) and in three periods (seedling, rosette, and heading stages) in the ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′ lines. Compared with Brgolden, the relative expression levels of BrGOLDEN were not significantly higher, in the four tissues from the three different periods (Figure S2a). Compared with IL, S, and R, the relative expression levels of BrGOLDEN and Brgolden in OL were highest (Figure S2a,b). Twelve key genes of the carotenoid synthesis pathway were analyzed at maturity. Compared with line ‘1900262′, the relative expression level of DXS was significantly higher in the roots of line ‘1900264′ (Figure 7a). However, these genes were not significantly different in the short stems of either line (Figure 7b). In particular, the relative expression levels of four genes (ZEP, DXS, CYP97C1, and PSY) were higher in the inner leaves of the ‘1900264′ line than in the ‘1900262′ line (Figure 7c). In addition, the relative expression levels of ZEP were similar between lines ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′ but were significantly higher than the other 11 genes in the outer leaves (Figure 7d). Previous studies found similar transcript levels of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in cauliflower and A. thaliana [47,48]. Thus, BrGOLDEN may promote carotenoid accumulation by regulating the expression of genes in the carotenoid synthesis pathway in B. rapa.

2.6. Brgolden Exhibits Distinct Expression Patterns

The cis−acting element of the Brgolden promoter was predicted and transgenic plants with a β−galactosidase (GUS) reporter driven by the Brgolden promoter (ProBrgolden:GUS) were generated in A. thaliana. Basic elements, such as central promoter elements (TATA−box) and enhancer elements (CAAT−box) necessary for eukaryotes, were included in the Brgolden promoter. In addition, there were several specific regulatory elements, including five light−responsive−related elements (GATA−motif, Box 4, TCT−motif, I−box, and G−box), two types of hormone−responsive cis−elements (TCA−element and ABRE), elements required for anaerobic induction (ARE), and a specific element of the roots (motif I) and seeds (RY−element) (Table 2). The GUS staining results of the three−week−old transgenic A. thaliana plants showed that GUS was expressed in the leaves, leaf veins, and petioles, but less so in the roots (Figure 8a,b). At the mature stage, there was higher GUS activity in the calyx, stigma, seed pods, and the junctions between the seed pods and seed stalks, whereas there was less GUS expression in the petals (Figure 8c–f). In summary, the Brgolden promoter may be a constitutive promoter driving GUS expression in different tissues.

2.7. Ectopic Overexpression of BrGOLDEN Increases Carotenoid Accumulation in A. thaliana Calluses

The function of BrGOLDEN was analyzed by constructing 35S:BrGOLDEN overexpressing (OE) vectors and transforming them into the A. thaliana wild type (Col−0). From the obtained transgenic lines, one OE representative line of each alternative splicing transcript (35S:BrGOLDENIns, 35S:BrGOLDENDel, and 35S:BrGOLDENLdel) was selected for the observation of phenotypic changes. All transgenic A. thaliana mutants were similar to the wild type in plant morphology and leaf phenotype (Figure 9a), which was consistent with the results of the wild type and BoORMUT B. oleracea [47]. This also indicates that carotenoid composition and content are in a dynamic balance in the leaf tissue for optimal photosynthesis [49]. Compared with the leaves, non−green tissues, such as calluses, tend to respond phenotypically to an increased carotenoid content [50]. In recent years, calluses have been used to rapidly characterize the function of genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation [51]. Therefore, calluses were induced from the seeds of these overexpressing A. thaliana lines and the wild type (Figure 9b). Under the same conditions, the calluses induced by 35S:BrGOLDENLdel and the wild type were nearly transparent or white, while the calluses of BrGOLDENIns and BrGOLDENDel were yellow, inferring that there was an accumulation of carotenoids. Thus, the function of BrGOLDEN was determined by different spliced transcripts.

2.8. Identification of the Target Proteins Involved in BrGOLDEN Interactions

PSY is the rate−limiting enzyme in the carotenoid synthesis pathway and its activity greatly affects carotenoid accumulation. Previous studies have shown that the N−terminus of OR physically interacts with PSY and positively regulates the PSY level and enzymatic activity, while the C−terminus forms a dimeric structure [46,52]. Treatment with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX), OR, was found to stabilize PSY, greatly reduce the protein turnover rate, and significantly increase carotenoid levels [53]. In this study, Brgoldenwt was a double−transmembrane protein (Figure 10a). Due to the different splicing modes of the N−terminus of the three alternative splicing transcripts, the integrity of the N−terminal and the transmembrane domain was destroyed (Figure S3). Therefore, the split−ubiquitin membrane Y2H system was used to verify whether Brgoldenwt, BrGOLDENIns, and BrGOLDENDel interacted with BrPSY1. The interaction between BrGOLDENLdel and BrPSY1 was verified using Y2H based on the nuclear interaction system (Figure 10b). Interestingly, although BrGOLDENIns, BrGOLDENLdel, and Brgoldenwt exhibited strong interactions with BrPSY1, BrGOLDENDel did not interact with BrPSY1 in the split−ubiquitin membrane system. In addition, after BrGOLDENDel−PBT3−N and BrPSY1−pPR3−N co−transformed yeast strains through the membrane interaction system, the negative and positive controls had the expected results. The strain on the DDO plate grew well, indicating that it was successfully transferred into the host cells. However, they did not grow on either the QDO or TDO plates supplemented with 5 mM 3AT, which was verified with replication. There was no interaction between BrGOLDENDel−PBT3−N and BrPSY1−pPR3−N in the split−ubiquitin membrane system. The amino acid deletion of BrGOLDENDel played an important role in its interaction with BrPSY1.
Compared with Brgoldenwt, the amino acid sequence of BrGOLDENDel lost the PNFPSFIPFLPPL sequence at position 125 amino acids and was replaced by the sequence KSQNPNL (Figure S1). The protein secondary structures of BrGOLDENDel and Brgoldenwt were predicted by Phyre2 (Figure S4) and included 11 β−strands and seven and nine α−helices, respectively. Due to sequence deletions, the important α−helix of the secondary structure of BrGOLDENDel was disrupted. The missing protein structure is located on the surface of the 3D structure, which plays an important role in the interactions between BrGOLDEN and BrPSY1. Using 3D structure prediction analysis, the Brgoldenwt structure was predicted successfully and BrGOLDENDel was not, which indicated that the loss of the sequences at position 125 amino acids limited its function. In addition, by analyzing the 3D structure of Brgoldenwt, this protein may be a tryptophan RNA−binding attenuator protein inhibitory protein with three molecular functions (binding, protein binding, and identical protein binding) and three cellular components (intracellular anatomical structure, cytoplasm, and cellular anatomical entity) [54]. This study further verified that the 3D structure of the protein was the most direct factor affecting the functions of the protein. Due to the mutation of several amino acids in BrGOLDENDel, the 3D structure of this protein was greatly changed, affecting the interaction between BrGOLDENDel and BrPSY1.

3. Discussion

The synthesis of carotenoids is very important in plants and the various 40−carbon compounds produced by metabolic pathways provide plants with red, orange, and yellow colors and give them ornamental value. The varied inner leaf colors of Chinese cabbage are attributed to different carotenoid compositions and concentrations. Due to the nutritional and health−related properties of carotenoids, research on carotenoid metabolism in Chinese cabbage inner leaves is an active field. At the same time, carotenoids are widely involved in growth and development processes, such as photosynthesis and plant stress. Studies have shown that carotenoids are synthesized in chromoplasts and are mainly found in non−green tissues [55]. In this study, a dominant gene BrGOLDEN, controlling carotenoid accumulation, was identified for the first time in the Chinese cabbage line with golden inner leaves. The results showed that BraA09g007080.3C, which was homologous to AtOR, was considered a candidate gene for BrGOLDEN. ORANGE is an important protein that stabilizes the rate−limiting enzyme PSY for carotenoid synthesis, which converts GGPPs to phytone [56,57]. As PSY protein level is crucial for overall pathway activity and carotenoid amounts, a tight control of PSY proteostasis is expected. Studies have showed that OR can also regulate the plastid−localized protein degradation machinery, namely the Clp protease complex, to maintain PSY proteostasis and fine−tune carotenogenesis [46,53].
In a previous study, the homolog BoOR of BrGOLDEN was reported in B. oleracea [44]. Comparing the sequences of BrGOLDEN with BoOR, an insertion event and three alternative splicing transcripts of BrGOLDEN were very similar to the BoOR mutant (Figures S5 and S6). In B. oleracea, a large fragment from C06 was inserted into BoOR in C09 and an extra 16 bp was generated, resulting in a 4686 bp fragment insertion. Unlike BoOR, BrGOLDEN retained only the entire insertion fragment sequence (4670 bp). RT−PCR was used to detect regulatory elements, including the CaMV 35S promoter, FMV 35S promoter, NOS promoter, NOS terminator, and CaMV 35S terminator, according to the testing method for genetically modified new varieties (Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China) and none of the target amplification products were detected in the parents (Figure S7). Thus, it was inferred that BrGOLDEN was not transformed into B. rapa by transgenic technology. Rather, it was transferred into B. rapa through distant hybridization between B. rapa and B. oleracea.
The large insertion found was a long terminal repeat (LTR) belonging to transposons, which are common in plants. Some studies have been reported in A. thaliana [58], B. rapa [59], and Oryza sativa [60], and the proportion of transposon−related sequences in each genome accounts for 10%, 39.5%, and 46%, respectively. LTRs are the most abundant transposon type in the B. rapa genome, accounting for 27.1% [59]. In animals and plants, transposons are extremely rich in functions, mainly mediating the formation of new genes, gene disruption, and regulation of gene expression or activity. The effects of transposons on genes are not only manifested at the transcriptional level but also at the post−transcriptional level [61]. These functions provide a theoretical basis into the regulation of carotenoid metabolism by BrGOLDEN.
The expression level of Brgolden in golden inner leaf Chinese cabbage was not more significant than that of BrGOLDEN. It is speculated that the accumulation of carotenoids is due to the new function acquired by the BrGOLDEN mutation, rather than the expression level. In plants, the ORANGE mutant exerts its functions through a variety of pathways. The differentiation of membranous chromoplasts can be induced by AtORHis or BoORmut, but not by AtOR or BoOR [48,62]. Alternatively, ORANGE enhanced the accumulation and preservation of β−carotene and lutein in the chromoplasts, turning the tissue golden [48]. Similar results were observed in Chinese cabbage. Interestingly, in line ‘1900264′, the outer leaf tissue with high expression of the BrGOLDEN appeared green, similar to the control. The short stems with lower expression showed an obvious golden color, forming a ‘golden circle’ structure. Overexpression of the PSY encodes a key rate−limiting enzyme for carotenoid production in A. thaliana, but the effect of PSY overexpression on carotenoid accumulation in leaves is extremely small [50]. This may be because the composition and content of carotenoids are highly conserved in the green tissues, thus, limiting chromoplast formation [49]. We speculate that these two genes may limit their functions through the same pathway in green tissue.
ORANGE can promote membranous chromoplast formation and carotenoid accumulation in many plants [44,48,63]. For example, the overexpression of BoORMUT in potato tubers produces orange tissue with increased carotenoid content. The mutation of a single amino acid in the OR (CmORHis) of melon can lead to a change in callus color and an increase in carotenoid content in A. thaliana and can specifically induce the formation of membranous chromoplasts [64]. In our study, BrGOLDEN may be derived from the cauliflower orange curd mutant but with some differences from BoORMUT, mainly reflected in the size of the LTR fragment and SNP variation in the transcripts. BrGOLDENIns and BrGOLDENDel could act alone to turn the callus golden in the induced A. thaliana callus and the deletion of the large fragment of BrGOLDENLdel limited this function. It may exert other effects by interacting with BrPSY1 in the nucleus or acting through a BrPSY1−independent pathway. PSY is a vital enzyme in carotenoid synthesis and the overexpression of AtOR and AtORHis did not cause changes in the transcription levels of PSY and other enzyme genes in A. thaliana. Previous studies have demonstrated that OR may post−transcriptionally regulate the protein level of PSY [48]. This provides a reasonable explanation for the promotion of carotenoid accumulation in B. rapa by BrGOLDEN. Interestingly, in our study, BrGOLDENDel did not interact with BrPSY1 in the membrane system, suggesting that it may promote carotenoid accumulation through a PSY1−independent pathway. These results contribute to diversity of molecular mechanisms of carotenoid synthesis and accumulation and also provide new insight for the improvement and marker−assisted selection (MAS) of carotenoid−rich Chinese cabbage varieties.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Callus Induction

The ‘1900264′ line, a commercial B. rapa variety, is an F1 cytoplasmic sterile hybrid line with golden inner leaves and a ‘golden circle’ in the short stem tissue. Line ‘1900262′ is a highly inbred B. rapa line with non−golden inner leaves and no significant carotenoid accumulation in the short stem tissue. The tri−crossed hybrid lines were obtained from the cross ‘1900264′ × ‘1900262′. All lines were cultivated in the Shunyi Base of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Plant samples at different stages were collected for DNA, RNA, and carotenoid analysis. The samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen for later use.
The A. thaliana (Col−0) was used for function verification. The A. thaliana seeds were plated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 0.8% agar and 3% sucrose. The seeds were vernalized at 4 °C for 3D and then transferred to a constant temperature incubator at 22 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark. After 10 d of growth, the seedlings were transplanted to the substrate until flowering.
To induce calluses, A. thaliana seeds were sterilized with 5% (v/v) NaClO for 15 min, washed 5–6 times with sterilized ddH2O and sown on seed−derived callus (SDC) medium (4.33 g/L MS basal salts/pH to 5.8 by 1 M KOH, 0.1% (v/v) Gamborg’s vitamin, 3% (w/v) sucrose, 0.5 mg/L 2,4−D, 2 mg/L indole−3−acetic acid, 0.5 mg/L 2−isopentenyladenine, 0.4% (w/v) agar) as previously described [50]. The seeds were germinated under 16 h of light/8 h of dark at 26 °C for 5 d and grown in the dark for 2 weeks in a growth incubator. Callus samples were collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C.

4.2. Genetic Analysis of the Golden Inner Leaf Phenotype

For genetic analysis, the non−golden inner leaf line ‘1900262′ (P1) was crossed with the golden inner leaf line ‘1900264′ (P2) to generate the tri−crossed hybrid lines. Phenotype characterization was performed for each generation (P1, P2, the tri−crossed hybrid lines) and the segregation ratios of the tri−crossed hybrid lines were analyzed using the chi−square (χ2) test. All phenotypes and samples were analyzed at the Shunyi Base, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

4.3. Protoplast Separation, Microstructure Observation, and Carotenoid Analysis

In this study, the microstructure was observed by isolating protoplasts and producing free−hand slices. Protoplasts were isolated by vacuum infiltration for 30 min and gently shaking for 3 h, with 1.5 g tissue in 10 mL of a solution of 0.4 M mannitol, 1.5% (w/v) cellulose, 0.4% (w/v) macerozyme (enzymes were manufactured by Yakult Pharmaceutical Industry), 20 mM KCl, MES (pH 5.7), and 10 mM CaCl2. Samples were centrifuged at 100× g for 2 min and resuspended with 8% mannitol for observation [65]. At the mature stage, tissue sections of the inner leaves and short stems of the two parent materials were made. Sections were mounted in water under a coverslip, observed, and photographed under a light microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).
The carotenoid content in the parental lines (‘1900264′ and ‘1900262′) was detected using the AB Sciex QTRAP 6500 LC−MS/MS platform. In the heading stage (14 weeks), Chinese cabbage inner leaves (~5 cm) were freeze−dried to a constant weight. The dried samples were then homogenized and powdered in a mill. The content of carotenoid components in Chinese cabbage was determined using previously described methods [66]. Three biological replicates were tested for each sample.

4.4. BSA−seq Mapping

The tri−crossed hybrid lines, comprising 151 individuals, were derived from a cross between lines ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′. From the populations, equal amounts of DNA were pooled from 40 plants with a non−golden inner leaf phenotype, which constituted the non−golden pool (NGP) and from 40 plants with a golden inner leaf phenotype, which constituted the golden pool (GP). Two mixed pools and two parent pools were used for association analyses. Approximately 40× genome sequences for each pool were generated using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, American) [67]. The B. rapa V3.0 and A. thaliana V10.0. were used as the reference genomes. The △SNP index and △Indel index of each position were calculated for sliding window analysis [68,69]. The SNPs and InDels were detected with GATK [70]. Gene functions were annotated with BLAST software (EMBL-EBI, Hinxton, UK) [71].

4.5. Cloning and Sequencing of Candidate Genes

The full−length BrGOLDEN sequence and CDS sequence were amplified from the gDNA and cDNA of lines ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′ using the primers GOLDEN−F/R (Table S4). The PCR product was constructed for the T1 vector via the pEASY−T1 Cloning Kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). A single colony was selected and sent to Sangon Biotech (Sangon, Shanghai, China) for sequencing. Sequencing results were compared at http://abc.gao−lab.org/, accessed on 5 May 2021. Subsequently, transmembrane domain prediction of gene−coding proteins was performed (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?TMHMM-2.0, accessed on 12 May 2021). Protein structures were predicted on Phyre2 (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index, accessed on 12 May 2021). Sequence alignment of ORANGE protein sequences was performed in Cruciferae and other species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA 7.0 software (Mega Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) and the neighbor−joining method, Poisson correction, and pairwise deletion method were used [72].

4.6. Quantitative Reverse−Transcription PCR

The relative expression levels of genes were analyzed via qRT−PCR. The total RNA from the seedling, rosette, and heading stages of both Chinese cabbage lines was extracted using a Plant Total RNA Mini Kit (Gene Better, Beijing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA quality was assessed using an RNA 6000 Nano Chip on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (http://www.chem.agilent.com, accessed on 22 April 2021). One microgram of total RNA was converted into cDNA using a reverse transcription kit (TransGen, Beijing, China). The qRT−PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The relative expression levels of all genes were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method using Bractin as a control [73]. Three technical replicates were performed for each experiment. The primers were designed using Premier 5 (Table S4).

4.7. Construction of ProBrgolden:GUS Fusion Vector and Histochemical Staining of Transgenic Plants

Based on the upstream sequence of Brgolden in the B. rapa genome database (http://brassicadb.cn, accessed on 9 September 2022), primers (Table S4) were designed to amplify the promoter sequence (~1.6 kb upstream) and ligated with the Easy−T1 vector. Prediction of promoter cis−acting elements was performed at Plant CARE [74]. After sequencing, the correct sequence was found by blasting in NCBI. The ProBrgolden:GUS expression vector was constructed by restriction enzymes Sca I and BamH I and then ligated with T4 ligase (TSINGKE, Beijing, China). The recombinant vectors were then transformed into A. thaliana Col−0 using the floral−dip method [75]. Arabidopsis thaliana from different tissues was selected for histochemical staining, as previously described [76].

4.8. Generation of Transgenic Plants Overexpressing BrGOLDEN

The complete coding region of BrGOLDEN was amplified from the cDNA by PCR using a pair of primers with a homologous arm (Table S4). The PCR product was inserted into the pCAMBIA1305 vector digested with BamH I and Xba I using a Trelief SoSoo Cloning Kit (TSINGKE, Beijing, China) to generate pCAMBIA1305−BrGOLDENIns, pCAMBIA1305−BrGOLDENLdel, and pCAMBIA1305−BrGOLDENDel. The recombinant plasmid was then transferred into E. coli DH5α and sent to Sangon Biotechnology for sequencing to verify the correct insertion. We subsequently introduced the overexpression construct into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101. pCAMBIA1305−BrGOLDENIns, pCAMBIA1305−BrGOLDENLdel, and pCAMBIA1305−BrGOLDENDel were then mixed to transform A. thaliana [75].

4.9. Y2H Assay

The full−length coding sequences of BrGOLDENLdel and BrPSY1 were cloned into pGBKT7 and pGADT7, respectively, following the Yeastmaker Yeast Transformation System 2 user manual (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). Both plasmids were co−transformed into the golden yeast strain. The resultant strains were grown on plates for 3D at 30 °C. The interaction was tested via growth assays on media lacking leucine, tryptophan, and histidine but containing 3AT.
Interactions between BrPSY1 and BrGOLDENIns, BrGOLDENLdel, and Brgoldenwt were investigated in yeast with the DUAL membrane starter system (Dual−Systems Biotech). Full−length coding sequences of BrGOLDENIns, BrGOLDENLdel, and Brgoldenwt were cloned into the PBT3−N vector and BrPSY1 was cloned into the pPR3−N vector. The primers are described in Table S4. The constructed bait vector and BrPSY1 were co−transformed into yeast strain NMY51. All strains were grown in different media: (1) SD medium lacking Trp and Leu; (2) QDO (SD medium lacking Trp, Leu, His, and Ade); and (3) QDO + 3AT (QDO with 5 mM 3−amino−1,2,4−triazole). The empty pPR3−N and PBT3 vectors were co−transformed into the NMY51 strain and tested for autoactivation with QDO medium.

4.10. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 8 (San Diego, CA, USA) and Microsoft Office Excel 2010 software (Redmond, WA, USA) were used to analyze the data from carotenoid content and qRT−PCR. IBM SPSS 25.0 (Armonk, NY, USA) was used to evaluate the significant differences (p < 0.05). Multiple t-tests were used for mean comparisons. The average standard deviations were adopted to indicate the measured values.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232012442/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z., G.L. and S.Z. (Shujiang Zhang); Methodology, L.Z. and S.Z. (Shifan Zhang); Project administration, G.C., L.Y., J.H., X.T., S.Z. (Shidong Zhu) and R.S.; Supervision, Y.D., S.W., C.W., F.L. and H.Z.; Writing—original draft, L.Z.; Writing—review and editing, G.L. and S.Z. (Shujiang Zhang). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was performed at the Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing, China. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102373), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (6212030), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS−23-A−14), the Beijing Joint Research Program for Germplasm Innovation and New Variety Breeding (G20220628003), and the Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (IVF-BRF2022002).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the results are included in this article and its Supplementary Materials. Other relevant materials are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bradshaw, J.E.; Pande, B.; Bryan, G.J.; Hackett, C.A.; McLean, K.; Stewart, H.E.; Waugh, R. Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to late blight [Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary], height and maturity in a tetraploid population of potato (Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum). Genetics 2004, 168, 983–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Walter, M.H.; Strack, D. Carotenoids and their cleavage products: Biosynthesis and functions. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2011, 28, 663–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Demmig-Adams, B.; Adams, W.W. Antioxidants in photosynthesis and human nutrition. Science 2002, 298, 2149–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Milborrow, B.V. The pathway of biosynthesis of abscisic acid in vascular plants: A review of the present state of knowledge of ABA biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 1145–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bouvier, F.; Suire, C.; Mutterer, J.; Camara, B. Oxidative remodeling of chromoplast carotenoids: Identification of the carotenoid dioxygenase CsCCD and CsZCD genes involved in crocus secondary metabolite biogenesis. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Fester, T.; Hause, B.; Schmidt, D.; Halfmann, K.; Schmidt, J.; Wray, V.; Hanse, G.; Strack, D. Occurrence and localization of apocarotenoids in arbuscular mycorrhizal plant roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 256–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Giuliano, G.; Al-Babili, S.; von Lintig, J. Carotenoid oxygenases: Cleave it or leave it. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lewinsohn, E.; Sitrit, Y.; Bar, E.; Azulay, Y.; Ibdah, M.; Meir, A.; Yosef, E.; Zamir, D.; Tadmor, Y. Not just colors—carotenoid degradation as a link between pigmentation and aroma in tomato and watermelon fruit. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2005, 16, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lu, S.; Li, L. Carotenoid metabolism: Biosynthesis, regulation, and beyond. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2008, 50, 778–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hirschberg, J. Carotenoid biosynthesis in flowering plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Taylor, M.; Ramsay, G. Carotenoid biosynthesis in plant storage organs: Recent advances and prospects for improving plant food quality. Physiol. Plant. 2005, 124, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. DellaPenna, D.; Pogson, B.J. Vitamin synthesis in plants: Tocopherols and carotenoids. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 711–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Li, L.; Yuan, H. Chromoplast biogenesis and carotenoid accumulation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 539, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cazzonelli, C.I.; Pogson, B.J. Source to sink: Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rodriguez-Concepcion, M. Supply of precursors for carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2010, 504, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brown, A.F.; Yousef, G.G.; Chebrolu, K.K.; Byrd, R.W.; Everhart, K.W.; Thomas, A.; Reid, R.W.; Parkin, I.A.P.; Sharpe, A.G.; Oliver, R.; et al. High-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array mapping in Brassica oleracea: Identification of QTL associated with carotenoid variation in broccoli florets. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 2051–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cunningham, F.X., Jr.; Chamovitz, D.; Misawa, N.; Gantt, E.; Hirschberg, J. Cloning and functional expression in Escherichia coli of a cyanobacterial gene for lycopene cyclase, the enzyme that catalyzes the biosynthesis of beta-carotene. FEBS Lett. 1993, 328, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cunningham, F.X., Jr.; Pogson, B.; Sun, Z.; McDonald, K.A.; DellaPenna, D.; Gantt, E. Functional analysis of the beta and epsilon lycopene cyclase enzymes of Arabidopsis reveals a mechanism for control of cyclic carotenoid formation. Plant Cell 1996, 8, 1613–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pecker, I.; Gabbay, R.; Cunningham, F.X., Jr.; Hirschberg, J. Cloning and characterization of the cDNA for lycopene beta-cyclase from tomato reveals decrease in its expression during fruit ripening. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 30, 807–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ronen, G.; Cohen, M.; Zamir, D.; Hirschberg, J. Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis during tomato fruit development: Expression of the gene for lycopene epsilon-cyclase is down-regulated during ripening and is elevated in the mutant Delta. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 1999, 17, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nisar, N.; Li, L.; Lu, S.; Khin, N.C.; Pogson, B.J. Carotenoid Metabolism in Plants. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 68–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rodriguez-Concepcion, M.; Boronat, A. Breaking new ground in the regulation of the early steps of plant isoprenoid biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 25, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hermanns, A.S.; Zhou, X.; Xu, Q.; Tadmor, Y.; Li, L. Carotenoid Pigment Accumulation in Horticultural Plants. Hortic. Plant J. 2020, 6, 343–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ruiz-Sola, M.A.; Rodriguez-Concepcion, M. Carotenoid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: A colorful pathway. Arab. Book 2012, 10, e0158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Clotault, J.; Peltier, D.; Berruyer, R.; Thomas, M.; Briard, M.; Geoffriau, E. Expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes during carrot root development. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 3563–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Fujisawa, M.; Nakano, T.; Shima, Y.; Ito, Y. A Large-Scale Identification of Direct Targets of the Tomato MADS Box Transcription Factor RIPENING INHIBITOR Reveals the Regulation of Fruit Ripening. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 371–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wu, M.B.; Xu, X.; Hu, X.W.; Liu, Y.D.; Cao, H.H.; Chan, H.E.; Gong, Z.H.; Yuan, Y.J.; Luo, Y.Q.; Feng, B.H.; et al. SlMYB72 Regulates the Metabolism of Chlorophylls, Carotenoids, and Flavonoids in Tomato Fruit(1). Plant Physiol. 2020, 183, 854–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fraser, P.D.; Truesdale, M.R.; Bird, C.R.; Schuch, W.; Bramley, P.M. Carotenoid Biosynthesis during Tomato Fruit Development (Evidence for Tissue-Specific Gene Expression). Plant Physiol. 1994, 105, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, Q.; Huang, X.-Q.; Cao, T.-J.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, R.; Lu, S. Heteromeric Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate Synthase Contributes to Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Ripening Fruits of Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum var. conoides). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 11691–11700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paul, P.; Dhandapani, V.; Li, X.; Choi, S.R.; Hur, Y.; Lim, Y.P. Identification of candidate genes involved in the biosynthesis of carotenoids in Brassica rapa. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2014, 55, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, L.; Dai, Y.; Yue, L.X.; Chen, G.H.; Yuan, L.Y.; Zhang, S.F.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Li, G.L.; Zhu, S.D.; et al. Heat stress response in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.) revealed by transcriptome and physiological analysis. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J. Mapping of or, a gene conferring orange color on the inner leaf of the Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp pekinensis). Mol. Breed. 2012, 29, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matsumoto, E.; Yasui, C.; Ohi, M.; Tsukada, M. Linkage analysis of RFLP markers for clubroot resistance and pigmentation in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Euphytica 1998, 104, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, F.; Wang, G.; Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Yu, S. Identification of SCAR markers linked to or, a gene inducing beta-carotene accumulation in Chinese cabbage. Euphytica 2008, 164, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, M.; Hui, M.; Wang, Q.; Li, L.; Zhang, L. Fine mapping and identification of candidate Br-or gene controlling orange head of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis). Mol. Breed. 2013, 32, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, S.; Lee, S.C.; Byun, D.H.; Lee, D.Y.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, H.O.; Sung, S.H.; Yang, T.J. Association of molecular markers derived from the BrCRTISO1 gene with prolycopene-enriched orange-colored leaves in Brassica rapa [corrected]. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, P.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Sun, R. Carotenoid identification and molecular analysis of carotenoid isomerase-encoding BrCRTISO, the candidate gene for inner leaf orange coloration in Chinese cabbage. Mol. Breed. 2015, 35, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Su, T.; Yu, S.; Zhang, J.W.F.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, X.; Wang, W. Loss of Function of the Carotenoid Isomerase Gene BrCRTISO Confers Orange Color to the Inner Leaves of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp pekinensis). Plant Mol. Biol. Report. 2015, 33, 648–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zou, C.L.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, P.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.H.; Liu, Z.Y.; Feng, H. Fine mapping and characterization of the or gene in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp pekinensis). Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yuan, H.; Zhang, J.; Nageswaran, D.; Li, L. Carotenoid metabolism and regulation in horticultural crops. Hortic. Res. 2015, 2, 15036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Michelmore, R.W.; Paran, I.; Kesseli, R.V. Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: A rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 9828–9832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hill, J.T.; Demarest, B.L.; Bisgrove, B.W.; Gorsi, B.; Su, Y.C.; Yost, H.J. MMAPPR: Mutation Mapping Analysis Pipeline for Pooled RNA-seq. Genome Res. 2013, 23, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fekih, R.; Takagi, H.; Tamiru, M.; Abe, A.; Natsume, S.; Yaegashi, H.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, S.; Kanzaki, H.; Matsumura, H. MutMap plus: Genetic Mapping and Mutant Identification without Crossing in Rice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lu, S.; Van Eck, J.; Zhou, X.; Lopez, A.B.; O’Halloran, D.M.; Cosman, K.M.; Conlin, B.J.; Paolillo, D.J.; Garvin, D.F.; Vrebalov, J.; et al. The cauliflower or gene encodes a DnaJ cysteine-rich domain-containing protein that mediates high levels of beta-carotene accumulation. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3594–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sun, T.; Zhou, F.; Huang, X.-Q.; Chen, W.-C.; Kong, M.-J.; Zhou, C.-F.; Zhuang, Z.; Li, L.; Lu, S. ORANGE Represses Chloroplast Biogenesis in Etiolated Arabidopsis Cotyledons via Interaction with TCP14. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 2996–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Zhou, X.; Welsch, R.; Yang, Y.; Alvarez, D.; Riediger, M.; Yuan, H.; Fish, T.; Liu, J.; Thannhauser, T.W.; Li, L. Arabidopsis OR proteins are the major posttranscriptional regulators of phytoene synthase in controlling carotenoid biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 3558–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Li, L.; Paolillo, D.J.; Parthasarathy, M.V.; DiMuzio, E.M.; Garvin, D.F. A novel gene mutation that confers abnormal patterns of beta-carotene accumulation in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis). Plant J. 2001, 26, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yuan, H.; Owsiany, K.; Sheeja, T.E.; Zhou, X.; Rodriguez, C.; Li, Y.; Welsch, R.; Chayut, N.; Yang, Y.; Thannhauser, T.W.; et al. A Single Amino Acid Substitution in an ORANGE Protein Promotes Carotenoid Overaccumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Domonkos, I.; Kis, M.; Gombos, Z.; Ughy, B. Carotenoids, versatile components of oxygenic photosynthesis. Prog. Lipid Res. 2013, 52, 539–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maass, D.; Arango, J.; Wuest, F.; Beyer, P.; Welsch, R. Carotenoid Crystal Formation in Arabidopsis and Carrot Roots Caused by Increased Phytoene Synthase Protein Levels. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bai, C.; Rivera, S.M.; Medina, V.; Alves, R.; Vilaprinyo, E.; Sorribas, A.; Canela, R.; Capell, T.; Sandmann, G.; Christou, P.; et al. An in vitro system for the rapid functional characterization of genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis and accumulation. Plant J. 2014, 77, 464–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chayut, N.; Yuan, H.; Ohali, S.; Meir, A.; Sa’ar, U.; Tzuri, G.; Zheng, Y.; Mazourek, M.; Gepstein, S.; Zhou, X.; et al. Distinct Mechanisms of the ORANGE Protein in Controlling Carotenoid Flux. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 376–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Welsch, R.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, H.; Alvarez, D.; Sun, T.; Schlossarek, D.; Yang, Y.; Shen, G.; Zhang, H.; Rodriguez-Concepcion, M.; et al. Clp Protease and OR Directly Control the Proteostasis of Phytoene Synthase, the Crucial Enzyme for Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Shevtsov, M.B.; Chen, Y.L.; Gollnick, P.; Antson, A.A. Crystal structure of Bacillus subtilis anti-TRAP protein, an antagonist of TRAP/RNA interaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 17600–17605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Zhou, M.; Deng, L.; Guo, S.; Yuan, G.; Li, C.; Li, C. Alternative transcription and feedback regulation suggest that SlIDI1 is involved in tomato carotenoid synthesis in a complex way. Hortic. Res. 2022, 9, uhab045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ruiz-Sola, M.A.; Coman, D.; Beck, G.; Barja, M.V.; Colinas, M.; Graf, A.; Welsch, R.; Ruetimann, P.; Buehlmann, P.; Bigler, L.; et al. Arabidopsis GERANYLGERANYL DIPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE 11 is a hub isozyme required for the production of most photosynthesis-related isoprenoids. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Camagna, M.; Grundmann, A.; Bar, C.; Koschmieder, J.; Beyer, P.; Welsch, R. Enzyme Fusion Removes Competition for Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate in Carotenogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 1013–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kaul, S.; Koo, H.L.; Jenkins, J.; Rizzo, M.; Rooney, T.; Tallon, L.J.; Feldblyum, T.; Nierman, W.; Benito, M.I.; Lin, X.Y. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408, 796–815. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Sun, R.; Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Bai, Y.; Mun, J.-H.; Bancroft, I.; Cheng, F. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Matsumoto, T.; Wu, J.Z.; Kanamori, H.; Katayose, Y.; Fujisawa, M.; Namiki, N.; Mizuno, H.; Yamamoto, K.; Antonio, B.A.; Baba, T.; et al. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature 2005, 436, 793–800. [Google Scholar]
  61. Macia, A.; Blanco-Jimenez, E.; Garcia-Perez, J.L. Retrotransposons in pluripotent cells: Impact and new roles in cellular plasticity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Gene Regul. Mech. 2015, 1849, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Paolillo, D.J.; Garvin, D.F.; Parthasarathy, M.V. The chromoplasts of Or mutants of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis). Protoplasma 2004, 224, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yazdani, M.; Sun, Z.X.; Yuan, H.; Zeng, S.H.; Thannhauser, T.W.; Vrebalov, J.; Ma, Q.Y.; Xu, Y.M.; Fei, Z.J.; Van Eck, J.; et al. Ectopic expression of ORANGE promotes carotenoid accumulation and fruit development in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Tzuri, G.; Zhou, X.J.; Chayut, N.; Yuan, H.; Portnoy, V.; Meir, A.; Sa’ar, U.; Baumkoler, F.; Mazourek, M.; Lewinsohn, E.; et al. A ‘golden’ SNP in CmOr governs the fruit flesh color of melon (Cucumis melo). Plant J. 2015, 82, 267–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mathur, J.; Koncz, C. Establishment and maintenance of cell suspension cultures. Methods Mol. Biol. 1998, 82, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  66. Fantini, E.; Falcone, G.; Frusciante, S.; Giliberto, L.; Giuliano, G. Dissection of Tomato Lycopene Biosynthesis through Virus-Induced Gene Silencing. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Meynert, A.M.; Ansari, M.; FitzPatrick, D.R.; Taylor, M.S. Variant detection sensitivity and biases in whole genome and exome sequencing. BMC Bioinform. 2014, 15, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Islam, M.S.; Zeng, L.; Thyssen, G.N.; Delhom, C.D.; Kim, H.J.; Li, P.; Fang, D.D. Mapping by sequencing in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) line MD52ne identified candidate genes for fiber strength and its related quality attributes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 1071–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, N.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.; Feng, H. Identification and fine mapping of a stay-green gene (Brnye1) in pakchoi (Brassica campestris L. ssp chinensis). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 673–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. McKenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, K.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lescot, M.; Dehais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouze, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hong, B.; Tong, Z.; Ma, N.; Kasuga, M.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Gao, J.-P. Expression of the Arabidopsis DREB1A gene in transgenic chrysanthemum enhances tolerance to low temperature. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2006, 81, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Liang, J.; Wu, J.; Cheng, F.; Wang, X. Three genes encoding AOP2, a protein involved in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis, are differentially expressed in Brassica rapa. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6205–6218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 12442 g001 550
Figure 1. Morphological observation of two Brassica rapa lines. Sectional view of the ‘1900264′ line (a) and ‘1900262′ line (d) at the mature stage (14 weeks). Phenotypes of short stems in the ‘1900264′ line (b,c) and the ‘1900262′ line (e,f) at the mature stage (14 weeks). Phenotype of the ‘1900264′ line grown for 4 (g), 6 (i), and 10 (k) weeks. Phenotype of the ‘1900262′ line grown for 4 (h), 6 (j), and 10 (l) weeks.
Figure 1. Morphological observation of two Brassica rapa lines. Sectional view of the ‘1900264′ line (a) and ‘1900262′ line (d) at the mature stage (14 weeks). Phenotypes of short stems in the ‘1900264′ line (b,c) and the ‘1900262′ line (e,f) at the mature stage (14 weeks). Phenotype of the ‘1900264′ line grown for 4 (g), 6 (i), and 10 (k) weeks. Phenotype of the ‘1900262′ line grown for 4 (h), 6 (j), and 10 (l) weeks.
Ijms 23 12442 g001
Ijms 23 12442 g002 550
Figure 2. Microstructure of the inner leaves and short stems in the ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′ lines. Microstructure of the short stem cells in the ‘1900264′ (a) and ‘1900262′ lines (b). Microstructure of the inner leaf cells in the ‘1900264′ (c) and ‘1900262′ lines (d). Inner leaf protoplasts of the ‘1900264′ (e) and ‘1900262′ lines (h) under 10× light microscope. Inner leaf protoplasts of the ‘1900264′ (f) and ‘1900262′ lines (i) under 40× light microscope. Short stem protoplasts of the ‘1900264′ (g) and ‘1900262′ lines (j) under 40× light microscope. The point of the red arrow indicates the chromoplasts. Va: vascular bundle; Pa: parenchyma cell.
Figure 2. Microstructure of the inner leaves and short stems in the ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′ lines. Microstructure of the short stem cells in the ‘1900264′ (a) and ‘1900262′ lines (b). Microstructure of the inner leaf cells in the ‘1900264′ (c) and ‘1900262′ lines (d). Inner leaf protoplasts of the ‘1900264′ (e) and ‘1900262′ lines (h) under 10× light microscope. Inner leaf protoplasts of the ‘1900264′ (f) and ‘1900262′ lines (i) under 40× light microscope. Short stem protoplasts of the ‘1900264′ (g) and ‘1900262′ lines (j) under 40× light microscope. The point of the red arrow indicates the chromoplasts. Va: vascular bundle; Pa: parenchyma cell.
Ijms 23 12442 g002
Ijms 23 12442 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of carotenoid content in the inner leaves of the ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′ lines. Data are the average ± SE of three biological replicates. Asterisk (*) indicates that there is a statistical difference, * indicates p ≤ 0.05; ** indicates p ≤ 0.01; **** indicates p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 3. Comparison of carotenoid content in the inner leaves of the ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′ lines. Data are the average ± SE of three biological replicates. Asterisk (*) indicates that there is a statistical difference, * indicates p ≤ 0.05; ** indicates p ≤ 0.01; **** indicates p ≤ 0.0001.
Ijms 23 12442 g003
Ijms 23 12442 g004 550
Figure 4. Genetic mapping of the golden inner leaf phenotype in B. rapa. Identification of the BrGOLDEN candidate region through the △SNP index (a) and △InDel index; (b) association analysis method. BrGOLDEN candidate regions identified by Euclidean distance (ED) and SNP (c) or ED and InDel (d) association analysis. The higher the index value or ED value, the better the association effect.
Figure 4. Genetic mapping of the golden inner leaf phenotype in B. rapa. Identification of the BrGOLDEN candidate region through the △SNP index (a) and △InDel index; (b) association analysis method. BrGOLDEN candidate regions identified by Euclidean distance (ED) and SNP (c) or ED and InDel (d) association analysis. The higher the index value or ED value, the better the association effect.
Ijms 23 12442 g004
Ijms 23 12442 g005 550
Figure 5. BrGOLDEN structure analysis. (a) The BrGOLDEN with the 4.67 kb LTR insertion site and different transcripts. Open boxes with numbers represent exons and solid lines represent introns. Triangles indicate insertion sites and grey boxes indicate deletion sites. BrgoldenLins, large insertion; BrGOLDENIns, insertion; BrGOLDENDel, deletion; BrGOLDENLdel, large deletion. (b) RT−PCR amplification of BrGOLDEN in the ‘1900264′ (lane 1) and ‘1900262′ lines (lane 2) cDNAs. Bractin served as an internal control. (c) Nucleotide sequence alignment of five transcript fragments. The blue words represent the transcripts resulting from the complete insertion of the second intron in the ‘1900262′ line and the red box indicates the translation end site. The red words and dotted lines indicate the splicing patterns of the three transcripts unique to the ‘1900264′ line.
Figure 5. BrGOLDEN structure analysis. (a) The BrGOLDEN with the 4.67 kb LTR insertion site and different transcripts. Open boxes with numbers represent exons and solid lines represent introns. Triangles indicate insertion sites and grey boxes indicate deletion sites. BrgoldenLins, large insertion; BrGOLDENIns, insertion; BrGOLDENDel, deletion; BrGOLDENLdel, large deletion. (b) RT−PCR amplification of BrGOLDEN in the ‘1900264′ (lane 1) and ‘1900262′ lines (lane 2) cDNAs. Bractin served as an internal control. (c) Nucleotide sequence alignment of five transcript fragments. The blue words represent the transcripts resulting from the complete insertion of the second intron in the ‘1900262′ line and the red box indicates the translation end site. The red words and dotted lines indicate the splicing patterns of the three transcripts unique to the ‘1900264′ line.
Ijms 23 12442 g005
Ijms 23 12442 g006 550
Figure 6. Phylogenetic analysis of ORANGE in Cruciferae and other species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA 7.0 software (Mega Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) using the neighbor−joining method. The bootstrap replication values were determined from 1000 replicates.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic analysis of ORANGE in Cruciferae and other species. The phylogenetic tree was constructed in MEGA 7.0 software (Mega Limited, Auckland, New Zealand) using the neighbor−joining method. The bootstrap replication values were determined from 1000 replicates.
Ijms 23 12442 g006
Ijms 23 12442 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression of carotenoid biosynthetic genes in lines ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′. Relative expression levels of carotenoid−synthesis−related genes in the roots (a), short stems (b), inner leaves (c), and outer leaves (d) of lines ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′. ZDS, BraA05g040310.3C; CRTISO, BraA09g063710.3C; VDE, BraA06g005700.3C; LCYB, BraA03g017230.3C; ZEP, BraA07g016880.3C and BraA07g016890.3C; DXS, BraA01g021140.3C; PSY, BraA02g006890.3C; GGPPS11.1, BraA08g021280.3C; GGPPS11.2, BraA01g002000.3C; BCH2, BraA10g010930.3C; CYP97C1, BraA07g021850.3.5C; CYP97A3, BraA08g009810.3C. An asterisk (*) indicates that there is a statistical difference, p ≤ 0.05, n = 3. Bractin served as a control. (e) Outline of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway. Red words indicate genes validated in the experiment.
Figure 7. Expression of carotenoid biosynthetic genes in lines ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′. Relative expression levels of carotenoid−synthesis−related genes in the roots (a), short stems (b), inner leaves (c), and outer leaves (d) of lines ‘1900262′ and ‘1900264′. ZDS, BraA05g040310.3C; CRTISO, BraA09g063710.3C; VDE, BraA06g005700.3C; LCYB, BraA03g017230.3C; ZEP, BraA07g016880.3C and BraA07g016890.3C; DXS, BraA01g021140.3C; PSY, BraA02g006890.3C; GGPPS11.1, BraA08g021280.3C; GGPPS11.2, BraA01g002000.3C; BCH2, BraA10g010930.3C; CYP97C1, BraA07g021850.3.5C; CYP97A3, BraA08g009810.3C. An asterisk (*) indicates that there is a statistical difference, p ≤ 0.05, n = 3. Bractin served as a control. (e) Outline of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway. Red words indicate genes validated in the experiment.
Ijms 23 12442 g007
Ijms 23 12442 g008 550
Figure 8. β−Galactosidase (GUS) staining of different tissues of ProBrgolden:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Three−week−old seedlings of ProBrgolden: GUS (a) and wild−type lines (b). Mature silique of ProBrgolden: GUS (c) and wild−type lines (d). Flowers of ProBrgolden: GUS (e) and wild−type lines (f).
Figure 8. β−Galactosidase (GUS) staining of different tissues of ProBrgolden:GUS transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Three−week−old seedlings of ProBrgolden: GUS (a) and wild−type lines (b). Mature silique of ProBrgolden: GUS (c) and wild−type lines (d). Flowers of ProBrgolden: GUS (e) and wild−type lines (f).
Ijms 23 12442 g008
Ijms 23 12442 g009 550
Figure 9. Phenotypic observations of plants and seed−derived calluses of A. thaliana lines overexpressing BrGOLDEN lines. (a) Rosette stage phenotypes of 35 S:BrGOLDEN transgenic and wild−type A. thaliana seedlings at four weeks. (b) Representative images from seed−derived calluses of BrGOLDEN overexpressing lines and the wild type.
Figure 9. Phenotypic observations of plants and seed−derived calluses of A. thaliana lines overexpressing BrGOLDEN lines. (a) Rosette stage phenotypes of 35 S:BrGOLDEN transgenic and wild−type A. thaliana seedlings at four weeks. (b) Representative images from seed−derived calluses of BrGOLDEN overexpressing lines and the wild type.
Ijms 23 12442 g009
Ijms 23 12442 g010 550
Figure 10. Interactions of BrPSY1 with BrGOLDEN. (a) Prediction of transmembrane helices in Brgoldenwt. The red line represents the transmembrane. The blue line represents the inside. The pink line represents the outside. Positions 142–164 and 197–219 amino acids represent transmembrane helices. The abscissa indicates the amino acid site. (b) Co−transformation of prey and bait vectors in various combinations validates protein interactions. Co−transformation of pPR3−N and pTSU2−App vectors was used as a negative control and co−transformation of pTSU2−APP and pNubG−Fe65 vectors was used as a positive control. Dilutions (1–10−4) of different concentrations of the saturated cultures were spotted onto SD/−Leu/−Trp/−His/−3AT plates.
Figure 10. Interactions of BrPSY1 with BrGOLDEN. (a) Prediction of transmembrane helices in Brgoldenwt. The red line represents the transmembrane. The blue line represents the inside. The pink line represents the outside. Positions 142–164 and 197–219 amino acids represent transmembrane helices. The abscissa indicates the amino acid site. (b) Co−transformation of prey and bait vectors in various combinations validates protein interactions. Co−transformation of pPR3−N and pTSU2−App vectors was used as a negative control and co−transformation of pTSU2−APP and pNubG−Fe65 vectors was used as a positive control. Dilutions (1–10−4) of different concentrations of the saturated cultures were spotted onto SD/−Leu/−Trp/−His/−3AT plates.
Ijms 23 12442 g010
Table
Table 1. Genetic analyses of the tri−crossed hybrid populations.
Table 1. Genetic analyses of the tri−crossed hybrid populations.
PopulationsGenerationsTotal PlantsNon−Golden Inner LeavesGolden Inner LeavesExpected Ratioχ2 Test
(Chi−Squared Test)
Tri−crossed hybrid linesP1 (1900262, aa genotype)2020
P2 (1900264, Aa genotype)20 20
P2 × P115180711:10.54
Table
Table 2. Analysis of cis−acting elements in the Brgolden promoter.
Table 2. Analysis of cis−acting elements in the Brgolden promoter.
Component NameCore SequenceNumbersPredictive Function
MBSCAACTG2MYB binding site involved in drought-inducibility
RY-elementCATGCATG1Cis-acting regulatory element involved in seed-specific regulation
GATA-motifGATAGGA1Part of a light-responsive element
TCA-elementCCATCTTTTT1Cis-acting element involved in salicylic acid responsiveness
Motif IgGTACGTGGCG1Cis-acting regulatory element root specific
Box 4ATTAAT1Part of a conserved DNA module involved in light responsiveness
AREAAACCA4Cis-acting regulatory element essential for the anaerobic induction
ABREACGTG3Cis-acting element involved in the abscisic acid responsiveness
TATA-boxTATATA19Core promoter element around −30 of transcription start
TATA-boxTATA15
TATA-boxTATAAAA5
TATA-boxTATTTAAA1
TATA-boxTATAA3
TATA-boxccTATAAAaa1
TCT-motifTCTTAC2Part of a light-responsive element
CAAT-boxCCAAT9Common cis-acting element in promoter and enhancer regions
CAAT-boxCAAT10
I-boxGTATAAGGCC1Part of a light-responsive element
G-boxCACGTG2Cis-acting regulatory element involved in light responsiveness
G-boxTACGTG1
motif_sequence10Short-function
W boxTTGACC1Cis-acting regulatory element essential for the pathogen induction
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Dai, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Chen, G.; Yuan, L.; Hou, J.; et al. Mapping and Validation of BrGOLDEN: A Dominant Gene Regulating Carotenoid Accumulation in Brassica rapa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012442

AMA Style

Zhang L, Zhang S, Dai Y, Wang S, Wang C, Li F, Zhang H, Chen G, Yuan L, Hou J, et al. Mapping and Validation of BrGOLDEN: A Dominant Gene Regulating Carotenoid Accumulation in Brassica rapa. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012442

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Lei, Shifan Zhang, Yun Dai, Shaoxing Wang, Chenggang Wang, Fei Li, Hui Zhang, Guohu Chen, Lingyun Yuan, Jinfeng Hou, and et al. 2022. "Mapping and Validation of BrGOLDEN: A Dominant Gene Regulating Carotenoid Accumulation in Brassica rapa" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012442

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop