Next Article in Journal
Trichoderma spp. Improves Flowering, Quality, and Nutritional Status of Ornamental Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
The Greater Impact of Paternal, Compared to Maternal, Hereditary Background on Depressive-Like Behavior in Wistar Kyoto Rats with Different Amino Acid Metabolism in the Pup Brain
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of AMT2-Type Ammonium Transporters Reveal That CsAMT2.2 and CsAMT2.3 Potentially Regulate NH4+ Absorption among Three Different Cultivars of Camellia sinensis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chlorine Dioxide: Friend or Foe for Cell Biomolecules? A Chemical Approach

by
Celia María Curieses Andrés
1,
José Manuel Pérez de la Lastra
2,*,
Celia Andrés Juan
3,
Francisco J. Plou
4 and
Eduardo Pérez-Lebeña
5
1
Hospital Clínico Universitario, Avenida de Ramón y Cajal, 3, 47003 Valladolid, Spain
2
Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology, CSIC-Spanish Research Council, Avda. Astrofísico Fco. Sánchez, 3, 38206 La Laguna, Spain
3
Cinquima Institute and Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Valladolid University, Paseo de Belén, 7, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
4
Institute of Catalysis and Petrochemistry, CSIC-Spanish Research Council, 28049 Madrid, Spain
5
Sistemas de Biotecnología y Recursos Naturales, 47625 Valladolid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(24), 15660; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660
Submission received: 26 October 2022 / Revised: 28 November 2022 / Accepted: 8 December 2022 / Published: 10 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Amino Acid Metabolism and Disease, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
This review examines the role of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) on inorganic compounds and cell biomolecules. As a disinfectant also present in drinking water, ClO2 helps to destroy bacteria, viruses, and some parasites. The Environmental Protection Agency EPA regulates the maximum concentration of chlorine dioxide in drinking water to be no more than 0.8 ppm. In any case, human consumption must be strictly regulated since, given its highly reactive nature, it can react with and oxidize many of the inorganic compounds found in natural waters. Simultaneously, chlorine dioxide reacts with natural organic matter in water, including humic and fulvic acids, forming oxidized organic compounds such as aldehydes and carboxylic acids, and rapidly oxidizes phenolic compounds, amines, amino acids, peptides, and proteins, as well as the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide NADH, responsible for electron and proton exchange and energy production in all cells. The influence of ClO2 on biomolecules is derived from its interference with redox processes, modifying the electrochemical balances in mitochondrial and cell membranes. This discourages its use on an individual basis and without specialized monitoring by health professionals.

1. Introduction

Regarding chlorine dioxide (ClO2), most of the reviews in the technical literature have been carried out from a biological or medical point of view, and others have analyzed its efficacy and safety as a disinfectant or in drinking water treatment. In this review, we focus on the chemical study of the interaction of ClO2 with organic molecules or inorganic cations present in cells, giving an overview of its reactivity, its potential toxicity for biological molecules and hazardousness if not used correctly, and cases for which it has been approved.
Chlorine dioxide was discovered in 1811 by Sir Humphry Davy and since the mid-20th century, it has been widely used in the paper industry as a bleach and for the treatment of drinking water. More recent developments extend its application to food processing, disinfection of premises and vehicles, mold eradication, air disinfection and odor control, swimming pool treatment, wound cleaning, and dental applications [1].
Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) is classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a safe and effective fourth generation, broad-spectrum, class A1 disinfectant [2,3]. It is used to purify drinking water without creating harmful concentrations of disinfection by-products [4]. The properties of ClO2 result from one-electron transfer reactions, so it is considered a strong oxidizing agent [5] and, unlike chlorine, does not tend to react with organic materials to form chlorinated species or with ammonia to form chloramine. Chlorine dioxide is an important biocide and bleach and is used as an alternative to chlorine in the purification and disinfection of drinking water [6]. ClO2 is used in 8.1% of drinking water treatment plants in the USA and 32.8% of those in China [7,8], and in some European countries [9], it is used in paper bleaching, sterilization of medical devices, and disinfection of foodstuffs [10]. According to the EPA, ClO2 is used “in public water-treatment facilities, to make water safe for drinking.” When chlorine dioxide is added to drinking water, it helps to destroy bacteria, viruses, and some types of parasites that can make people sick, such as Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia.
Its main advantage over chlorine is that it reduces the formation of harmful organochlorine compounds [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. ClO2 is beneficial in minimizing the formation of trihalomethanes; however, ClO2 is converted to ClO2 and ClO3, which can cause hemolytic anemia and other health effects. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set the maximum concentration in drinking water at 0.8 milligrams per liter (mg/L) for chlorine dioxide and 1.0 mg/L for chlorite ions [18]. Some of its industrial applications are listed in Figure 1.
Chlorine dioxide is a compound that differs from elemental chlorine, both in its chemical structure and in its behavior [19]. An important characteristic is its high solubility in water, especially in cold water. Chlorine dioxide is about 10 times more soluble in water than chlorine.

2. Physicochemical Properties of ClO2

ClO2 is a yellowish-green gas and has a pungent odor, like Cl2, with a boiling point of 11 °C, a melting point of −59 °C, a density of 1.64 g mL−1 (liquid) at 0 °C, a water solubility of 3 g L−1 at 25 °C, and a pKa = 3. ClO2 is very soluble in water and does not hydrolyze, remaining in solution as a dissolved gas [20]. Solutions of ClO2 in water are stable when protected from light and kept at room temperature or below, well-sealed, and slightly acidified (pH = 6). The ultraviolet absorption spectrum of ClO2 solutions is broadband with a peak at 359 nm and a molar extinction coefficient of 1250 M−1 cm−1. ClO2 has a relatively short half-life and is highly volatile and explosive at concentrations > 10% in air [21]. Chlorine dioxide may not be compressed, stored, or transported under pressure and must be manufactured at the place of consumption.
ClO2 is a neutral monomeric free radical with a dipole moment of 1.792 Debye [22]. From the microwave spectra of gas-phase chlorine dioxide, the chlorine-oxygen distance is found to be approximately 0.147 nm and electron diffraction indicates 0.149 nm. This chlorine-oxygen distance is approximately that of an average chlorine-oxygen double bond. Studies on the geometry of ClO2 established that the bond distance between the Cl atom and the O atom is smaller compared to the bond in chlorine monoxide (ClO). These results explain and justify the representation of the double bond between these two atoms, as well as showing that resonance structures satisfactorily explain the unpaired electron of the chlorine atom. ClO2 has a molecular geometry with an oxygen-chlorine-oxygen bond angle of 117.6°, as shown in Figure 2. In its ground state, although the unpaired electron is shared between the two oxygen atoms and the chlorine atom, most of the electron density resides mainly on either oxygen atom.
It has an odd number of valence electrons (it is a paramagnetic radical), and its electronic structure has long puzzled chemists, because none of the possible Lewis structures are satisfactory. In 1933, Brockway proposed a structure involving a three-electron bond [23]; Linus Pauling later developed this idea and proposed two possible resonant structures involving a double bond on the one hand and a single bond with a three-electron bond on the other [24].
The electronegativity of the two oxygen atoms is large enough to eliminate the electron density of the chlorine atom and gives chlorine a partial positive charge, Figure 2.

3. Generation of Chlorine Dioxide

Chlorine dioxide is a widely used disinfectant as an alternative to chlorine, due to its effectiveness in pathogen inactivation and low production of halogenated organic by-products of disinfection. However, during the generation of ClO2, chlorine is inevitably introduced into the ClO2 solution obtained as an impurity. The presence of chlorine in chlorine dioxide may affect the formation and toxicity of disinfection by-products as well as the disinfection efficiency.
There are different methods for the preparation of chlorine dioxide [16], depending on the amount required, the number of by-products that can be tolerated, and whether the gas is required in solution or in gaseous form, Figure 3.

3.1. From Chlorite Ions

ClO2 is generated from chlorite ions using chemicals, electrochemicals, and biocatalysts, and from the reaction of chlorite with chlorine gas Cl2 or hydrochloric acid (HCl) [25,26,27], as shown in Figure 4.
The methods described in Figure 4 have major disadvantages due to the production of high amounts of chlorides, which can be avoided by replacing hydrochloric with sulfuric acid, although in such cases, the processes become less efficient. These methods involve concentrated acids and/or externally added oxidants such as Cl2, OCl, and H2O2.
Another way to generate ClO2 from chlorite by one-electron transfer is by electrochemical means [28], but this procedure requires a considerable input of electrical energy. An electrochemical method using mixed metal oxide MMO electrodes in the presence of chlorite and boron-doped diamond BDD anodes to promote the evolution of chlorine species was also studied [29,30]. Another possibility is to start from an undoped solution of sodium chlorite and a mixture of sodium chloride in an undivided electrochemical cell with a constant current, Ti/IrO2 anode, and Ti/Pt cathode [31,32].
To oxidize chlorite to ClO2, catalysts are based on manganese or iron porphyrin complexes. In these systems, chlorite dismutation is initiated through the oxidation of Mn(II or III) or Fe(III) by chlorite ions to produce hypochlorite ions and high-valent Mn and Fe(IV or V). Both oxidation states, IV and V, oxidize chlorite directly to ClO2, although complete conversion of chlorite to ClO2 was achieved in water using water-soluble Fe or Mn porphyrins. The synthesis of these ligands and catalysts is very expensive. A catalytic process has also been developed using a manganese porphyrin catalyst, tetra-kis-5,10,15,20-(N,N-dimethylimidazolium) porphyrinatomanganese(III), which is soluble in water and catalyzes the formation of chlorine dioxide from chlorite at room temperature and pH = 5 [33,34,35,36].

3.2. From Sodium Chlorate

Currently, the most widely used method to produce chlorine dioxide is the reduction method, by reacting sodium chlorate in a concentrated acid solution with reducing agents such as sulfur dioxide, methanol, oxalic acid, hydrogen peroxide, hydrochloric acid, or sodium chloride. With hydrochloric acid, the chlorine content is high, the purity of the chlorine dioxide is low, and the contamination is severe [37,38].
The sulfur dioxide method has the disadvantage of SO2 [38], with side reactions and low efficiency, which limits its application. The methanol process is currently the most widely used method for chlorine dioxide production in new-build plants worldwide [37]. The chlorine dioxide obtained is of high purity, but this method requires high acidity, and the reactor needs materials with excellent corrosion resistance.
In the chlorate reduction method, hydrogen peroxide advantageously replaces the other reagents, the process is more environmentally friendly, and the main by-product formed is oxygen, Figure 5.
The reaction between commercial solutions of chlorate and H2O2 results in the formation of ClO2 [38]. The reaction is very reproducible and stoichiometric. It is very important that the reaction mixture is not depleted of chlorate to avoid further reduction of ClO2. Once ClO2 is formed, the reduction of the chlorinated species continues, leading to the formation of other species, such as chlorite, Figure 6.
When large quantities of chlorine dioxide are needed, sodium chlorate is used as a raw material, and this method has traditionally been used in the pulp and paper industries. The conditions for producing ClO2 from sodium chlorite can be better controlled than those for sodium chlorate, but chlorite is more expensive and unstable, and therefore, from an industrial point of view, sodium chlorate is a more suitable feedstock [39].

4. Decomposition of ClO2

4.1. Disproportionation of Chlorine Dioxide with OH

In solution at neutral pH, in the absence of light, and at room temperature or below, chlorine dioxide is fairly stable [40], but its decomposition is accelerated in alkaline solution to give ClO2 and ClO3 [41], Figure 7.
Ion chromatography shows that ClO2 and ClO3 are the only chlorine products formed from the decomposition of ClO2 in a basic solution. However, the ratio of ClO2 to ClO3 is not 1:1 as required for the disproportionation reaction. According to several authors, the percentage of ClO2 is higher than that of ClO3 as the ClO2 concentration decreases. At micromolar levels of ClO2 the yield of ClO2 is higher than that of ClO3. The following additional reaction could explain the change of molar stoichiometry from ClO2 to ClO3 [42], Figure 8.
The three possible mechanisms (Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11) can explain the stoichiometry of the decomposition of ClO2 in alkaline solution, via assisted electron transfer [41].
In the mechanism of ClO3 formation from ClO2 in basic media, the reaction of ClO2 with OH generates species where OH binds to the Cl atom of ClO2 to form the intermediate (HOCl(O)O). The formation of ClO3 occurred from the reaction between HOClO2 and OH. This pathway shows first order kinetics with respect to the concentrations of ClO2 and OH, Figure 9.
For the formation of ClO2 in basic media, it is proposed that OH- forms an adduct with one of the oxygen atoms of ClO2 to give OClOOH, and OCl is weakly bound to OOH. This adduct can undergo rapid electron transfer with a second ClO2 to give ClO2 and OClOOH. The latter species reacts favorably with OH to generate HOClO and HOO. The reaction between HOO and ClO2 gives ClO2 and O2 [43], Figure 10.
A third possibility involves the formation of an intermediate dimer [44], Cl2O4, which reacts with OH (an electron transfer step). This pathway is important at high ClO2 concentrations, Figure 11.
The distribution of chlorine dioxide decomposition products in a basic solution changes as the ClO2 concentration decreases. While disproportionation reactions giving equal amounts of ClO2 and ClO3 dominate the stoichiometry at millimolar or higher ClO2 levels, the ratio of ClO2 to ClO3 formed increases significantly at micromolar levels of ClO2 [42].
The kinetic evidence shows three concurrent pathways that show a first order dependence on [OH] but have a variable order on [ClO2]. Pathway 1 is a disproportionation reaction that is first order in [ClO2], Figure 12.
Pathway 2, a previously unknown reaction, is also first order in [ClO2] but forms ClO2 as the only chlorine-containing product. Pathway 2 is attributed to the attack of OH on an oxygen atom of ClO2 leading to intermediate peroxide intermediates and producing ClO2 and O2 as products. This pathway is important at low levels of ClO2, Figure 13.
Pathway 3 is second order in [ClO2] and generates equal amounts of ClO2 and ClO3. A Cl2O4 intermediate is proposed for this pathway. At high ClO2 concentrations, pathway 3 brings the overall yield of ClO3 close to the overall yield of ClO2, Figure 14.

4.2. Disproportionation of Chlorine Dioxide with Nucleophile

The effect of OX hypohalite ion catalysis on the disproportionation of chlorine dioxide in basic solution to give ClO2 and ClO3 has been studied. In the first step of hypohalite catalysis (the reaction between ClO2 and OX involved a transfer of electrons to form ClO2 and OX), this step is reversible [45,46,47], Figure 15.
In the second step, the reactions between ClO2 and XO form XOClO2, Figure 16.
In basic medium, hydrolysis of XOClO2 produces ClO3 and OX, Figure 17.

4.3. Photodissociation of ClO2

The reactivity of ClO2 is modified by exposure to UV radiation in a process known as UV/ClO2. ClO2 undergoes photodissociation leading to the formation of the primary radical oxygen (O), chlorine (Cl), and chlorine oxide (ClO) by homolytic fission of the chlorine-oxygen bond to form ClO and O [48,49,50]. Illumination of a neutral aqueous ClO2 solution gives a mixture of chloric acid and hydrochloric acid, Figure 18.
The photochemical and thermal decomposition of ClO2 takes place by homolytic fission of the chlorine-oxygen bond, Figure 19.
Once homolytic fission has occurred, further reactions will depend on the reaction conditions. At room temperature, photolysis of dry, gaseous ClO2 gives Cl2, O2, and some ClO3, which subsequently dimerizes to Cl2O6 or undergoes further photolysis to Cl2 and O2, Figure 20.
The degradation mechanisms and radical chemistry associated with UVC photolysis of ClO2 are quite complicated [51]. The photolysis of ClO2 by UVC light provides ClO and oxygen by cleavage of the Cl-O [52] and Cl [53] bond, Figure 21.
The above species can undergo chain reactions to generate secondary reactive species [54,55], Figure 22.
The degradation of ClO2 under UVC radiation accelerates the tendency of chlorite and chlorate formation compared to ClO2 alone. In addition, chlorite and chlorate can also be generated from radical-radical interactions [56,57,58,59], Figure 23.

5. Reactivity of ClO2

The chemistry of ClO2 is complex compared to that of other chlorine compounds, because of its high reactivity. Chlorine dioxide is a strong oxidizing agent and, unlike chlorine, does not tend to react with organic materials to form chlorinated species, or with ammonia to form chloramine. The oxidation of ClO2 generally begins with the removal of an electron from residual organic compounds to produce organic radicals and ClO2. Subsequent oxidation of the organic radicals by ClO2 involves oxygen transfer with the release of HOCl or electron transfer with the release of ClO2 [46,50].
Inorganic compounds are important in the body and are responsible for many simple functions. The major inorganic compounds are H2O, molecular oxygen O2, carbon dioxide CO2, and some acids, bases, and salts. Iron is a biologically essential component of every living organism and various cellular mechanisms have evolved to capture iron from the environment in biologically useful forms [60]. It is primarily involved in the transfer of oxygen from the lungs to tissues. However, iron also plays a role in metabolism as a component of some proteins and enzymes. Manganese (Mn) is a trace mineral that is present in tiny amounts in the body. It is found mostly in bones, the liver, kidneys, and pancreas, and helps the body form connective tissue, bones, blood clotting factors, and sex hormones. Manganese is a cofactor for many enzymes, including manganese superoxide dismutase, arginase, and pyruvate carboxylase. In these enzymes, manganese is involved in the metabolism of amino acids, cholesterol, glucose, and carbohydrates; the elimination of reactive oxygen species; bone formation; reproduction; immune response; and blood coagulation and hemostasis together with vitamin K [61,62,63,64,65,66,67].
Some researchers have studied the reactivity of ClO2 with inorganic and organic compounds has been studied [68]. In the human body, ClO2 can react with I, NO2, O3, H2O2, Fe(II), and Mn(II). The rate constants with tertiary amines and phenols were also high at pH ≥ 6. ClO2 does not react with ammonia, Br, carbohydrates, aromatic hydro-carbides, and compounds containing C=C double bonds at neutral pH conditions.

5.1. Reactivity of ClO2 with Inorganic Compounds

ClO2 can oxidize many inorganic compounds, being first reduced to chlorite by the transfer of a single electron. In addition, chlorite can react with Fe(II) and Mn(II) [69,70,71,72]; the reactions [70,71] are summarized in Figure 24.
The reaction rate constants of the ClO2 oxidation of Fe(II) and Mn(II) increase greatly with alkaline pH. Iodide, unlike bromide, is readily oxidized in the presence of ClO2 to iodine. During oxidation of aqueous iodide, ClO2 can rapidly oxidize I to I2 [73]. Chlorite [74,75] produced by the reduction of ClO2 can also react with excess I to form I2 at pH 4–8 [76,77,78] (Figure 25).
The nitrite ion is oxidized to nitrate in the presence of ClO2. Like iodide, the oxidation of nitrite (NO2) by ClO2 involves mainly electron transfer reactions (Figure 26).
Chlorite can be further reduced to chloride through reactions with CN and NO2. In the following reaction shown in Figure 27, H2O2 acts as a reducing agent [8].
In the reaction with O3, ClO2 is the reducing agent (Figure 28).

5.2. Reactivity with Organic Compounds

The reactions of ClO2 with organic compounds have generally been investigated in aqueous solutions with low reagent concentrations, in which it reacts with humic and fulvic acids present in water, forming oxidized organic compounds, such as aldehydes and carboxylic acids. It does not form chlorinated organic by-products unless free chlorine is present together with chlorine dioxide.
ClO2 reacts with phenolic groups, sulfur compounds, and to a lesser extent, tertiary amines and aromatic amines, while the reaction with hydrocarbons is practically nil. The reactivity of the phenoxide ion and the neutral form of the amine is much greater (by several orders of magnitude) than the reactivity of the neutral form of the phenol and the protonated amine. ClO2 tends to react with organic compounds as an electron acceptor and is reduced to chlorite. This makes ClO2 a selective oxidant whose reactivity generally favors organic molecules with a lone pair of electrons.

5.3. Reactivity with Phenolic Compounds

Chlorine dioxide oxidizes phenolic compounds and has been used to oxidize chlorinated phenolic compounds to reduce their toxicity. At neutral pH, phenols react with ClO2 with values between 103–108 M−1 s−1. The reaction rate constants of phenols dissociated with ClO2 are generally six orders of magnitude higher than those of undissociated phenols [79] (Table 1). Therefore, at high pH, the oxidation of phenols with ClO2 is favored. The substituents of phenols greatly affect their oxidation rates with ClO2.
The main products of the oxidation of phenols with chlorine dioxide are p-benzoquinone and various substituted chloro-p-benzoquinones [80]. The chlorophenols are oxidized to the corresponding quinones. With a large excess of ClO2, the p-quinone is oxidized with ring cleavage, forming dicarboxylic acids. Oxidation of phenols and chloro-phenols [81] is shown in Figure 29.
This is a two-step mechanism: ClO2 reacts with a phenoxide ion that is stabilized to ClO2 and a phenoxy radical. This radical reacts rapidly with a second equivalent of ClO2 to produce p-benzoquinone and release HOCl. In this mechanism, it was suggested that a phenoxy radical and ClO2 radical intermediate could be formed [82] (Figure 30).
Chlorinated derivatives in the oxidations of phenols with ClO2 can be explained by the hypochlorous acid formed in the reaction [83] (Figure 31).

5.4. Reactivity with Amines

5.4.1. Reactivity with Aromatic Amines

Aromatic amines are widely distributed in aqueous media, sometimes as degradation products of herbicides (in agriculture) or dyes in industrial wastewater [84].
The mechanism of ClO2 oxidation of aniline begins with an electron transfer in the first step. The amino group is directly attached to a benzene ring (and is a high electron density center), so there is a change in the electron density of the nitrogen atom as it gives up charge to the benzene ring. The reaction pathways and products obtained are different from those observed with aliphatic amines. The main product obtained is the quinone-azobenzene derivative (Figure 32).
Reaction rates of aniline (4.5 × 105 M−1 s−1) and two substituted anilines: 4-Aminoaniline (3.5 × 108 M−1 s−1) and N,N-dimethylaniline ( 4.4 × 106 M−1 s−1) at pH 7 [75].

5.4.2. Reactivity with Aliphatic Amines

Aliphatic amines are widely distributed in aqueous media, and they react quickly with ClO2 to form freely available chlorine FAC [85]. Second-order rate constants for reactions of chlorine dioxide with aliphatic amines in aqueous solutions are listed in Table 2.
Tertiary amines react with ClO2 very quickly; secondary and especially primary amines react much more slowly, and ammonia does not react with ClO2 at all [80,87].
ClO2 oxidizes most aliphatic tertiary amines rapidly and converts them to secondary amines, also forming aldehydes. The possible mechanism is the formation of an aminyl cation radical and chlorite followed by the elimination of a proton at alpha, forming an amine thatsubsequently hydrolyses to the aldehyde and secondary amine [8].

5.5. Reactivity with Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Reaction rates with amines decrease in the order tertiary amine > secondary amine > primary amine. For tertiary amines, the reaction rate constants are in the range 103–106 M−1 s−1 at neutral pH and are between 2–5 orders of magnitude higher than for secondary or primary amines. ClO2 reacts much faster with deprotonated amines than with neutral species because deprotonated amines are stronger electron donors [90,91].
The reactivity of ClO2 with biologically important molecules (including amino acids and some peptides) has been well studied [92,93]. ClO2 is an effective and promising alternative to other chlorine-containing disinfectants, and a thorough understanding of the chemistry of interactions with amino acids, proteins, and peptides is needed.
ClO2 reacts rapidly with cysteine, tyrosine, and tryptophan (104–107 M−1 s−1), but slowly with histidine, proline, alanine, and glycine (10−5–10−2 M−1 s−1) [93]. Amino acids have a primary amine in their structure; this amino group is not reactive with ClO2. Amino acids reactive with ClO2 contain other reactive groups such as phenols or sulfur groups. The following order of reactivity has been reported (Figure 33 and Figure 34).
Cysteine, due to its nucleophilic -SH group, is the most reactive amino acid with ClO2 [94]. Oxidation of cysteine by ClO2 has been studied in detail, determining the stoichiometry and reaction products [95]. The stoichiometry of the reaction ([ClO2]: [Cys]) was found to be pH-dependent, being 1:0.9 in acidic media and 1:3.7 in basic media (Figure 35).
At acidic pH, cysteine sulphonic acid was produced, while at alkaline pH, cystine was obtained, which are products of the oxidation of cysteine by ClO2 (Figure 36).
The reactive cysteine species is the thiolate ion, and it is proposed that the rate-determining step involves electron abstraction from the thiolate ion by ClO2 to give the cysteinyl radical. This radical reacts rapidly with another ClO2 molecule to form a cysteinyl-ClO2 adduct, which is disproportionated by two pH-dependent pathways to produce cystine and cysteic acid (Figure 37).
The reactivity of glutathione is like that of cysteine, and similar steps in the reaction with ClO2 are proposed. A study of the oxidation of thiols (Cys and GSH) by ClO2 with varying pH has been performed. The rate constant for Cys and GSH increased with pH from 3.2 to 5.9. The pH-dependent behavior suggests that deprotonated thiols are the reactive species. The rate constants [94,95] for the reactions of ClO2 with cysteinyl anion (CS) and glutathione anion (GS) are 1.0 × 108 M−1 s−1 and 1.4 × 108 M−1 s−1, respectively. Similar rate constants suggest common oxidation mechanisms for cysteine and glutathione by ClO2.
In the reactions of histidine, tryptophan, and tyrosine with ClO2, different products are obtained depending on the molar ratios of ClO2. The products also vary if the reaction is done in the presence or absence of oxygen. With an excess of ClO2, low molecular weight compounds are obtained.
ClO2 oxidation of tyrosine occurs predominantly in its phenolic structure, resulting in the formation of dopaquinone and dopachrome at pH 6–7. Cyclisation of dopaquinone occurred at pH > 4 to form cyclodopa, which was subsequently oxidized to dopachrome [96] (Figure 38).
The product of tryptophan oxidation by ClO2 was identified as N-formyl alkyl-nurenine [97]. The initial reaction between tryptophan and ClO2 is a one-electron oxidation to form a tryptophan radical cation and a chlorite ion. The radical cation deprotonates to form a neutral tryptophilic radical, which reacts rapidly with a second ClO2 molecule to give a short-lived adduct (kobs = 48 s−1) with formation of the C-OClO bond. This adduct decomposes to give HOCl [8] (Figure 39).
The reaction consumes two ClO2 per Trp and forms chlorite and HOCl (Figure 40).

5.6. Oxidation of Peptides and Proteins by ClO2

ClO2 is a selective oxidant that only reacts with five amino acids: cysteine, tyrosine, tryptophan, histidine, and proline. Cysteine, tyrosine, and tryptophan have much faster reaction rate constants. Mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy show that tryptophan residues are converted to N-formyl alkyl-nurenine and tyrosine residues are converted to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) or 2,4,5-trihydroxyphenylalanine (TOPA) in ClO2-treated proteins. Tryptophan residues are critical targets in the reaction between ClO2 and proteins [98,99], causing protein fragmentation and denaturation. Inactivation of influenza A virus when treated with ClO2 has been observed due to oxidation of a tryptophan residue (W153) that was converted to NFK in hemagglutinin, restricting its ability to bind to host cells [100].
Using bovine serum albumin and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) from baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as model proteins, it was shown that the antimicrobial activity of ClO2 is mainly attributed to its protein denaturing activity. Elemental analyses show that oxygen atoms, but not chlorine atoms, are incorporated into the ClO2-treated protein, providing direct evidence that ClO2 oxidizes the protein. For glutathione, a tripeptide consisting of glycine, cysteine, and glutamic acid, the ClO2-reactive site is the thiol group, and the oxidation products are like those of cysteine (Table 3).

5.7. Oxidation of NADH by Chlorine Dioxide

The oxidation of dihydronicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) by chlorine dioxide in phosphate-buffered solutions (pH 6–8) is very fast, with a second-order rate constant of 3.9 × 106 M−1 s−1 at 24.6 °C. The stoichiometry is shown in Figure 41.
Unlike many oxidants in which NADH reacts by hydride transfer, the proposed mechanism is a one-electron transfer from NADH to ClO2. First, chlorine dioxide accepts an electron from NADH to form ClO2 and the radical cation NADH+. Then, the subsequent sequence of very rapid deprotonation with the transfer of H+ to H2O and the transfer of an electron to a second equivalent of ClO2 gives as products 2ClO2, H3O+, and NAD+ [101] (Figure 42).
The mechanism by which ClO2 influences biomolecules is based on the strong interference with redox processes occurring in mitochondrial and cell membranes, e.g., on the NADH/NAD+ system, which is responsible for cellular respiration and for mediating ATP synthesis [102].

6. Oxidation of Hemoglobin by ClO2

Chlorine dioxide is an oxidizing agent that converts hemoglobin (oxygen-carrying protein) into methemoglobin, which cannot bind to other oxygen molecules and therefore hinders oxygenation of the body. In these cases, as when ingested in large quantities, ClO2 oxidizes ferrous iron (Fe2+) and transforms it into ferric iron (Fe3+), and hemoglobin becomes methemoglobin, which causes respiratory failure [33].
Methemoglobin is an oxidized form of hemoglobin that is unable to carry oxygen in the blood and is therefore unable to release it effectively into the body’s tissues, thus preventing oxygenation of the body. High levels of methemoglobin can have other risks. Methemoglobin-forming chemicals can oxidate the ferrous nucleus of hemoglobin (Fe2+) into trivalent iron (Fe3+), transforming hemoglobin into methemoglobin. Its toxic effects are due to the reduced oxygen-carrying capacity of methemoglobin, resulting in cellular hypoxia [103,104] (Figure 43).
In 2015, the first case of a child with methemoglobinemia (high methemoglobin levels) after accidentally ingesting chlorine dioxide appeared in the literature. The authors reported that “the patient had profound hypoxia, did not respond to oxygen therapy, and required endotracheal intubation to maintain a normal oxygen level” [105].
In another publication in 2013, a person who tried to commit suicide and ingested less than 100 mL of a 28% sodium chlorite solution had 40% methemoglobin in his blood, requiring a kidney transplant and transfusions to save his life [106].
For these reasons, specialists conclude that chlorine dioxide not only deoxygenates the body, it can cause low tissue oxygenation capacity even in small doses, a situation that can put people’s lives at risk.

7. Toxicity of ClO2

In December 2019, a new respiratory illness emerged in Wuhan, China. The source of this infection was identified as a new coronavirus, related to other coronaviruses that had previously caused outbreaks of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) between 2002 and 2004 and MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) in 2012 (National Institutes of Health, 2020). This virus was named “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2) and the disease resulting from infection with this virus was named “COVID-19”. On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Coronaviruses are a group of enveloped RNA viruses that can damage multiple organ systems. Like other coronaviruses, SARS-CoV-2 is a spherical particle with glycoprotein spikes on its surface. Coronaviruses enter host cells when a region of the spike, known as the “receptor-binding domain”, binds to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) in human cells. The viral membrane then fuses with the host cell membrane, allowing the viral genome to enter the host cell.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the consumption of chlorine dioxide solutions has been promoted through different avenues (social networks, websites, mass media) for the treatment or prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Different regulatory agencies (such as the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration) and scientific societies have drafted and issued statements warning about the lack of scientific evidence for their efficacy in COVID-19 disease and the associated risks to human health, and even demanded the withdrawal of these products from the market.
The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the United States of America and COFEPRIS (Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios) in Mexico state that the consumption of ClO2 causes kidney and liver failure and destroys red blood cells. To date, there is no scientific evidence to support the use of chlorine dioxide or chlorine derivatives as preventive or therapeutic agents against COVID-19 [107,108,109].
Studies have described the toxic effects of chlorine dioxide ingestion. The main routes of intoxication can be divided into three: inhalation, oral, and parenteral routes (Figure 44).
Chlorine dioxide can be rapidly absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract. Peak blood concentration levels can be reached within 1 h after a single dose administered orally. It can also be absorbed slowly through shaved skin with a median absorption time of 22 h. Intact chlorine dioxide is unlikely to be absorbed by inhalation given its highly reactive nature; it is more likely that its derivatives can be absorbed. Chlorine dioxide is metabolized to chlorite, chlorate, and mainly chloride. Most of the administered chlorine dioxide and its metabolites remain in the plasma, followed by the kidneys, lungs, stomach, intestine, liver, and spleen. About 43% of orally administered chlorine dioxide is excreted in the urine and feces within 72 h.
It is important to note that neither chlorine dioxide nor its derivatives have undergone any evaluation or authorization by the competent authorities to ensure that the benefit/risk ratio is positive for the population.
There is no published scientific evidence that has positively considered the use of chlorine dioxide or its derivatives as a preventive or therapeutic agent against COVID-19 administered by inhalation, oral, or parenteral routes [109,110]. Some of the risks of consuming ClO2 and its derivatives are listed in Figure 45.
The median oral lethal dose (LD50) has been estimated to be 94 mg/kg body weight and it is therefore considered a moderately toxic and hazardous substance. The Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products (AEMPS) warns of serious health risks from the consumption of chlorine dioxide [111].

8. Antimicrobial Activity of ClO2

Chlorine dioxide acts as an oxidizing biocide and controls the growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria by inhibiting the transport of nutrients through the cell wall by destroying it [112]. Its effectiveness is similar or even superior in some respects to that of other known oxidants such as ozone or chlorine. It behaves as an oxidizing agent through electronic exchange, which allows it to oxidize any type of organic compound, from viruses and bacteria to proteins, hence its frequent use to purify water or certain surfaces. Pereira et al., 2008, compared the efficacy of HOCl, ClO2, and O3 in the inactivation of Cryptosporidium oocyst in a public water supply from Brazilian South conditions. Experiments were carried out in samples containing 2 × 104 oocysts/mL of C. parvum purified from feces of experimentally contaminated calves. By using HOCl, the maximum inactivation rate obtained was 49.04% after 120 min, at 2 ppm. ClO2 at 5 ppm inactivated 90.56% of oocysts after 90 min of contact. O3 was the most effective product, rendering an inactivation of 100% at 24 ppm.
In the case of enveloped viruses, chlorine dioxide reacts directly with amino acid residues of proteins located on the enveloped viral surface; in the case of non-enveloped viruses, ClO2 acts on the viral genome, affecting the ribonucleic acid RNA in the cell. By this mechanism, chlorine dioxide prevents the production of proteins and, therefore, promotes the elimination of the virus. Chlorine dioxide is a strong oxidizing agent that can be applied both in solution and in a gaseous state. It has bactericidal, fungicidal, and virucidal properties. Several food-related microorganisms, including Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, yeasts and mold spores, and Bacillus cereus spores, were tested for susceptibility to 0.08 mg/L gaseous ClO2 for 1 min at 90% relative humidity [17]. In this screening, according to Vandekinderen et al., 2009, the resistance of the different groups of microorganisms to gaseous ClO2 generally increased in the order of Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, yeast spores, molds, and Bacillus cereus spores. Factors influencing the antimicrobial efficacy of gaseous ClO2 were its concentration, contact time, relative humidity, and temperature. Yeasts were more resistant to ClO2 than Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Significantly, ClO2 has been shown to be effective in inactivating Bacillus anthracis spores [113,114,115] in government and commercial buildings; however, Bacillus cereus was little affected by ClO2 [113,114,115,116].
The resistance of different groups of microorganisms to gaseous ClO2 generally increased in the order of Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, yeast and mold spores, and Bacillus cereus spores. ClO2 arguably provides the complete solution for disinfection because it kills the widest variety of microbes in short contact times and has fewer corrosive effects on surfaces. In addition, the use of ClO2 avoids the threat of microbial resistance (Figure 46).
The oxidative capacity of chemicals denotes the number of electrons a molecule can accept from surrounding molecules. In the case of ClO2, it can gain five electrons from microbial species per molecule, making it a superior biocide to alternative oxidants, which can normally only gain two. This enhanced effect is attributed to its two-step reduction (Figure 47).
Figure 41 shows the reduction of ClO2. In the first step, ClO2 is reduced to chlorite after accepting one electron and then further reduced by accepting four additional electrons and four hydrogen atoms [117]. This two-step process allows it to sequester a greater number of electrons from microbes compared to other oxidants. This means that chlorine dioxide will have a reduced corrosive effect on the surfaces to which it is applied, while having a greater ability to kill. The reason why oxidizing agents such as ClO2 are preferred to non-oxidizing disinfectants is due to their proven efficacy against bacterial spores and other microorganisms in short contact times.
Chlorine dioxide kills pathogens through electron exchange, sequestering electrons from the microorganism’s structures, such as cell walls, membranes, organelles, and genetic materials, causing a molecular imbalance that leads to the death of the microorganism. Microbes cannot develop resistance to ClO2 due to the reaction mechanism and are destroyed.
Biocides, such as quaternary ammonium compounds and triamines, contribute to increased microbial resistance, and several resistant strains, such as E. coli and C. difficile spores, have been identified. In contrast, microbial resistance is not possible with ClO2 because of its mode of action, which is modifying microbial structures and targeting their physiological molecular integrity. This induces membrane rupture, disrupting protein function, inhibiting RNA synthesis, and killing the microbes.

9. Conclusions

In this study, the research has focused on two complementary aspects: (i) on analyzing the reactivity of ClO2 and its possible reactions with organic and inorganic compounds; and (ii) its potential uses and its toxicity if consumed out of specification.
ClO2 is added to drinking water to protect people from harmful bacteria and other microorganisms. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognizes chlorine dioxide use as a drinking water disinfectant, and it is included in WHO’s Guidelines for drinking-water quality. When added to drinking water, it helps destroy bacteria, viruses, and some types of parasites that can make people sick, such as Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia lamblia. EPA regulates the maximum concentration of chlorine dioxide in drinking water to be no greater than 0.8 ppm. In medical settings, ClO2 can be used to help sterilize equipment, surfaces, rooms, and tools. In hospitals and other healthcare environments, ClO2 helps to sterilize medical and laboratory equipment, surfaces, rooms, and tools. Researchers have found that at appropriate concentrations, ClO2 is both safe and effective at helping to eliminate Legionella bacteria in hospital environments. Legionella pneumophila bacteria can cause Legionnaires’ disease, a potentially deadly type of pneumonia [118,119].
ClO2 is highly reactive, reacting to oxidize inorganic and organic compounds found in water, including humic and fulvic acids, forming oxidized organic compounds such as aldehydes and carboxylic acids. Inside cells, ClO2 oxidizes phenolic compounds, amines, amino acids, peptides, and proteins, as well as NADH, whose key function is to regulate electron and proton exchange and energy production in all cells. Their effect on biomolecules arises from interference with redox processes, modifying the electronic exchanges that occur in complexes I-IV of mitochondrial respiration and cell membranes.
Depending on concentration and frequency, it is toxic to human health, hence there are limits to its exposure to ensure safe use. The mean oral lethal dose LD50 for rats is 94 mg per kg body weight; it is therefore classified as a moderately toxic and hazardous substance. According to the classification provided by companies to the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) in the REACH registrations, this substance is fatal by inhalation, toxic by ingestion, causes severe skin burns and eye damage, and is very toxic to the environment and aquatic life, with long-lasting effects.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the consumption of ClO2 solutions has been promoted by non-scientists and non-medical people through different avenues (social networks, websites, mass media) for the treatment or prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To date, there is no scientific evidence to uphold the use of ClO2 or chlorine derivatives as preventive or therapeutic agents against COVID-19. Its action is unproven, and deaths have been reported, so health agencies such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have officially stated that they do not recommend taking it. Some of the common symptoms of intoxication include severe vomiting and diarrhea, anemia, severe liver failure, low blood pressure, arrythmia, and methemoglobinemia [120].
Ingestion of ClO2 outside the regulations approved by health authorities can have serious results, including intestinal perforation. It is important to emphasize the need to follow communications and warnings from health authorities and governmental institutions. There are documented cases, both in the scientific literature and in the popular media, of severe side effects caused by ClO2 poisoning. According to court documents, in the US alone, poison control centers have treated more than 16,000 cases of chlorine dioxide poisoning from 2014 to the end of 2020 [121].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.C.A. and C.A.J.; investigation, C.M.C.A. and C.A.J.; writing—review and editing, C.M.C.A., C.A.J., J.M.P.d.l.L., E.P.-L. and F.J.P.; supervision, C.M.C.A., C.A.J. and J.M.P.d.l.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by project APOGEO (Cooperation Program INTERREG-MAC 2014–2020, with European Funds for Regional Development-FEDER. “Agencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la Información (ACIISI) del Gobierno de Canarias”, project ProID2020010134, Caja Canarias, project 2019SP43 and Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grant PID2019-105838RB-C31).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aieta, E.M.; Berg, J.D. A Review of Chlorine Dioxide in Drinking Water Treatment. J. (Am. Water Work. Assoc.) 1986, 78, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deshwal, B.R.; Lee, H.-K. Manufacture of Chlorine Dioxide from Sodium Chlorate: State of the Art. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2005, 11, 330–346. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mei, L.; Shilong, T.; Jin, S.; Xizhuo, W.; Jianxin, C.; Shouqiang, L.; Xia, G.; Jiachun, T. Effects of chlorine dioxide on morphology and ultrastructure of Fusarium sulphureum and its virulence to potato tubers. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2017, 10, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Xie, Y.; Ni, T.; Liu, G. Oxidative removal of diclofenac by chlorine dioxide: Reaction kinetics and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 279, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Friedline, A.W.; Zachariah, M.M.; Middaugh, A.N.; Heiser, M.J.; Khanna, N.; Vaishampayan, P.; Rice, C.V. Sterilization of hydrogen peroxide resistant bacterial spores with stabilized chlorine dioxide. AMB Express 2015, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Al-Hamzah, A.; Rahman, M.M.; Kurup, P.K.; Barnawi, A.; Ghannam, B.; Musharraf, I.; Najjar, F.A.; Obeidallah, A.; Palmer, N. Use of chlorine dioxide as alternative to chlorination in reverse osmosis product water. Desalinat. Water Treat. 2019, 163, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, J.-Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.-H.; Deng, C.-H.; Xu, N.; Shi, W.; Cheng, P. Highly selective luminescent sensing of xylene isomers by a water stable Zn-organic framework. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2016, 69, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gan, W.; Ge, Y.; Zhong, Y.-H.; Yang, X. The reactions of chlorine dioxide with inorganic and organic compounds in water treatment: Kinetics and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 2020, 6, 2287–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jeong, C.H.; Wagner, E.D.; Siebert, V.R.; Anduri, S.; Richardson, S.D.; Daiber, E.J.; Mckague, A.B.; Kogevinas, M.; Villanueva, C.M.; Goslan, E.H.; et al. Occurrence and toxicity of disinfection byproducts in European drinking waters in relation with the HIWATE epidemiology study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 12120–12128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharma, V.K.; Sohn, M. Oxidation of Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins by Chlorine Dioxide. Implications for Water Treatment. In Environmental chemistry for a sustainable world; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsai, L.S.; Higby, R.; Schade, J.E. Disinfection of Poultry Chiller Water with Chlorine Dioxide: Consumption and Byproduct Formation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1995, 43, 2768–2773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, J.; Huang, T.-S.; Marshall, M.R.; Wei, C.I. Chlorine Dioxide Treatment of Seafoods to Reduce Bacterial Loads. J. Food Sci. 1999, 64, 1089–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, H.; Kang, Y.; Beuchat, L.R.; Ryu, J.-H. Production and stability of chlorine dioxide in organic acid solutions as affected by pH, type of acid, and concentration of sodium chlorite, and its effectiveness in inactivating Bacillus cereus spores. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 964–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kull, T.P.J.; Backlund, P.H.; Karlsson, K.M.; Meriluoto, J. Oxidation of the cyanobacterial hepatotoxin microcystin-LR by chlorine dioxide: Reaction kinetics, characterization, and toxicity of reaction products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6025–6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kull, T.P.J.; Sjövall, O.; Tammenkoski, M.; Backlund, P.H.; Meriluoto, J. Oxidation of the cyanobacterial hepatotoxin microcystin-LR by chlorine dioxide: Influence of natural organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 1504–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gordon, G.; Rosenblatt, A.A. Chlorine Dioxide: The Current State of the Art. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2005, 27, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vandekinderen, I.; Devlieghere, F.; Van Camp, J.; Kerkaert, B.; Cucu, T.; Ragaert, P.; De Bruyne, J.; De Meulenaer, B. Effects of food composition on the inactivation of foodborne microorganisms by chlorine dioxide. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 131, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Taylor, J.; Wohlers, D.W.; Amata, R. Toxicological Profile for Chlorine Dioxide and Chlorite. In Draft for Public Comment; Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Atlanta, GA, USA, 2004. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  19. Vogt, H.; Balej, J.; Bennett, J.E.; Wintzer, P.; Sheikh, S.A.; Gallone, P.; Vasudevan, S.; Pelin, K. Chlorine Oxides and Chlorine Oxygen Acids. 2010. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/14356007.a06_483 (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  20. Bastidas-Ortiz. Chlorine Dioxide: Does It Contribute to Human Health? A Brief Review. 2021. Available online: https://www.truthforhealth.org/2022/06/chlorine-dioxide-does-it-contribute-to-human-health-a-brief-review/ (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  21. Jin, R.; Hu, S.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-G.; Bo, T. Concentration-dependence of the explosion characteristics of chlorine dioxide gas. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 842–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, T. CO2 and N2O laser Stark spectroscopy of the ν1 band of the ClO2 radical. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1983, 98, 425–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brockway, L.O. The Three-Electron Bond in Chlorine Dioxide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1933, 19, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Jost, W. Linus Pauling: “General Chemistry”, 2nd ed.; W.H. Freeman and Company: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  25. Marcon, J.; Mortha, G.; Marlin, N.; Molton, F.; Duboc, C.; Burnet, A. New insights into the decomposition mechanism of chlorine dioxide at alkaline pH. Holzforschung 2017, 71, 599–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Svenson, D.R.; Kadla, J.F.; Chang, H.m.; Jameel, H. Effect of pH on the Inorganic Species Involved in a Chlorine Dioxide Reaction System. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 5927–5933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. White, G.C. The Handbook of Chlorination and Alternative Disinfectants, 5th ed. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1992.
  28. Tsai, Y.-T.; Chang, C.Y.; Hsieh, Y.H. The Generation of Chlorine Dioxide by Electrochemistry Technology. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2013, 19, 3285–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pillai, K.C.; Kwon, T.O.; Park, B.B.; Moon, I.S. Studies on process parameters for chlorine dioxide production using IrO2 anode in an un-divided electrochemical cell. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164, 812–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brito, C.d.N.; Araújo, D.M.d.; Martínez-Huitle, C.A.A.; Rodrigo, M.A. Understanding active chlorine species production using boron doped diamond films with lower and higher sp3/sp2 ratio. Electrochem. Commun. 2015, 55, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mostafa, E.; Reinsberg, P.H.; Garcia-Segura, S.; Baltruschat, H. Chlorine species evolution during electrochlorination on boron-doped diamond anodes: In-situ electrogeneration of Cl2, Cl2O and ClO2. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 281, 831–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Souza, F.L.; Sáez, C.; Lanza, M.R.V.; Cañizares, P.; Rodrigo, M.A. The effect of the sp3/sp2 carbon ratio on the electrochemical oxidation of 2,4-D with p-Si BDD anodes. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 187, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Umile, T.P.; Groves, J.T. Catalytic generation of chlorine dioxide from chlorite using a water-soluble manganese porphyrin. Angew. Chem. 2011, 50, 695–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Umile, T.P.; Wang, D.; Groves, J.T. Dissection of the mechanism of manganese porphyrin-catalyzed chlorine dioxide generation. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 10353–10362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hicks, S.D.; Petersen, J.; Bougher, C.J.; Abu-Omar, M.M. Chlorite dismutation to chlorine dioxide catalyzed by a water-soluble manganese porphyrin. Angew. Chem. 2011, 50, 699–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zdilla, M.J.; Lee, A.Q.; Abu-Omar, M.M. Bioinspired dismutation of chlorite to dioxygen and chloride catalyzed by a water-soluble iron porphyrin. Angew. Chem. 2008, 47, 7697–7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qi, M.; Yi, T.; Mo, Q.; Huang, L.; Zhao, H.; Xu, H.; Huang, C.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Hui, Z. Preparation of High-Purity Chlorine Dioxide by Combined Reduction. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2020, 43, 1850–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Monteiro, M.K.S.; Monteiro, M.M.S.; de Melo Henrique, A.M.; Llanos, J.; Saez, C.; Dos Santos, E.V.; Rodrigo, M.A. A review on the electrochemical production of chlorine dioxide from chlorates and hydrogen peroxide. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 27, 100685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Romero-Fierro, D.; Bustamante-Torres, M.; Hidalgo-Bonilla, S.; Bucio, E. Microbial degradation of disinfectants. In Recent Advances in Microbial Degradation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 91–130. [Google Scholar]
  40. Guggenberger, M.; Hettegger, H.; Zwirchmayr, N.S.; Hosoya, T.; Bacher, M.; Zaccaron, S.; Böhmdorfer, S.; Reiter, H.; Spitzbart, M.; Dietz, T. Degradation of the cellulosic key chromophore 2, 5-dihydroxy-[1,4]-benzoquinone (DHBQ) under conditions of chlorine dioxide pulp bleaching: Formation of rhodizonate as secondary chromophore—A combined experimental and theoretical study. Cellulose 2020, 27, 3623–3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kucera, J. Biofouling of polyamide membranes: Fouling mechanisms, current mitigation and cleaning strategies, and future prospects. Membranes 2019, 9, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Odeh, I.N.; Francisco, J.S.; Margerum, D.W. New pathways for chlorine dioxide decomposition in basic solution. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6500–6506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, J.; Cassol, G.S.; Zhao, J.; Sato, Y.; Jing, B.; Zhang, Y.; Shang, C.; Yang, X.; Ao, Z.; Chen, G. Superfast degradation of micropollutants in water by reactive species generated from the reaction between chlorine dioxide and sulfite. Water Res. 2022, 222, 118886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kishimoto, N. State of the art of UV/chlorine advanced oxidation processes: Their mechanism, byproducts formation, process variation, and applications. J. Water Environ. Technol. 2019, 17, 302–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Saini, P.; Krishnan, A.; Yadav, D.; Hazra, S.; Elias, A.J. External Catalyst-Free Oxidation of Benzyl Halides to Benzoic Acids Using NaOH/TBHP in Water. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2021, 10, 2355–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rougé, V.; Allard, S.; Croué, J.-P.; von Gunten, U. In situ formation of free chlorine during ClO2 treatment: Implications on the formation of disinfection byproducts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 13421–13429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, L.; Margerum, D.W. Hypohalite ion catalysis of the disproportionation of chlorine dioxide. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 6099–6105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Firak, D.S.; Farkas, L.; Náfrádi, M.; Alapi, T. Degradation of chlorinated and hydroxylated intermediates in UVA/ClO2 systems: A chlorine-based advanced oxidation process investigation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Philpott, M.J.; Hayes, S.C.; Reid, P.J. Femtosecond pump–probe studies of chlorine dioxide photochemistry in water and acetonitrile. Chem. Phys. 1998, 236, 207–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chuang, Y.-H.; Wu, K.-L.; Lin, W.-C.; Shi, H.-J. Photolysis of Chlorine Dioxide under UVA Irradiation: Radical Formation, Application in Treating Micropollutants, Formation of Disinfection Byproducts, and Toxicity under Scenarios Relevant to Potable Reuse and Drinking Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 2593–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Kong, Q.; Fan, M.; Yin, R.; Zhang, X.; Lei, Y.; Shang, C.; Yang, X. Micropollutant abatement and byproduct formation during the co-exposure of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) and UVC radiation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cosson, H.; Ernst, W.R. Photodecomposition of chlorine dioxide and sodium chlorite in aqueous solution by irradiation with ultraviolet light. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 1468–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thøgersen, J.; Jepsen, P.U.; Thomsen, C.; Poulsen, J.A.; Byberg, J.; Keiding, S. Femtosecond photolysis of ClO2 in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 3317–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fang, J.; Fu, Y.; Shang, C. The roles of reactive species in micropollutant degradation in the UV/free chlorine system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 1859–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yin, R.; Blatchley, E.R., III; Shang, C. UV photolysis of mono-and dichloramine using UV-LEDs as radiation sources: Photodecay rates and radical concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 8420–8429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (⋅ OH/⋅ O− in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Buxton, G.; Subhani, M. Radiation chemistry and photochemistry of oxychlorine ions. Part 2.—Photodecomposition of aqueous solutions of hypochlorite ions. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases 1972, 68, 958–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Guo, K.; Wu, Z.; Shang, C.; Yao, B.; Hou, S.; Yang, X.; Song, W.; Fang, J. Radical chemistry and structural relationships of PPCP degradation by UV/chlorine treatment in simulated drinking water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10431–10439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zuo, Z.; Katsumura, Y.; Ueda, K.; Ishigure, K. Reactions between some inorganic radicals and oxychlorides studied by pulse radiolysis and laser photolysis. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abbaspour, N.; Hurrell, R.; Kelishadi, R. Review on iron and its importance for human health. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2014, 19, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Ross, A.C.; Caballero, B.; Cousins, R.J.; Tucker, K.L. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease; Jones & Bartlett Learning: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  62. Nielsen, F.H. Manganese, molybdenum, boron, chromium, and other trace elements. Present Knowl. Nutr. 2012, 2012, 586–607. [Google Scholar]
  63. Li, L.; Yang, X. The essential element manganese, oxidative stress, and metabolic diseases: Links and interactions. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 7580707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Russell, R.; Beard, J.L.; Cousins, R.J.; Dunn, J.T.; Ferland, G.; Hambidge, K.; Lynch, S.; Penland, J.; Ross, A.; Stoecker, B. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc; A Report of the Panel on Micronutrients, Subcommittees on upper Reference Levels of Nutrients and of Interpretation and Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes, and the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes Food and Nutrition Board Institute of Medicine; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001; p. 797. [Google Scholar]
  65. Aschner, J.L.; Aschner, M. Nutritional aspects of manganese homeostasis. Mol. Asp. Med. 2005, 26, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Palacios, C. The role of nutrients in bone health, from A to Z. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, P.; Bornhorst, J.; Aschner, M.A. Manganese Metabolism in Humans. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2018, 23, 1655–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Hoigné, J.; Bader, H. Kinetics of reactions of chlorine dioxide (OClO) in water—I. Rate constants for inorganic and organic compounds. Water Res. 1994, 28, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Van Benschoten, J.E.; Lin, W.; Knocke, W.R. Kinetic modeling of manganese (II) oxidation by chlorine dioxide and potassium permanganate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, L.; Odeh, I.N.; Margerum, D.W. Chlorine dioxide reduction by aqueous iron (II) through outer-sphere and inner-sphere electron-transfer pathways. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 7545–7551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Henderson, R.; Carlson, K.; Gregory, D. The impact of ferrous ion reduction of chlorite ion on drinking water process performance. Water Res. 2001, 35, 4464–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, X. Coupling technique for deep removal of manganese and iron from potable water. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2016, 33, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fábián, I.; Gordon, G. The kinetics and mechanism of the chlorine dioxide–iodide ion reaction. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 2494–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stanbury, D.M.; Martinez, R.; Tseng, E.; Miller, C.E. Slow electron transfer between main-group species: Oxidation of nitrite by chlorine dioxide. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 4277–4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Huie, R.E.; Neta, P. Kinetics of one-electron transfer reactions involving chlorine dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fukutomi, H.; Gordon, G. Kinetic study of the reaction between chlorine dioxide and potassium iodide in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1362–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kern, D.M.; Kim, C.-H. Iodine Catalysis in the Chlorite-Iodide Reaction1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 5309–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lengyel, I.; Li, J.; Kustin, K.; Epstein, I.R. Rate constants for reactions between iodine-and chlorine-containing species: A detailed mechanism of the chlorine dioxide/chlorite-iodide reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3708–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lee, Y.; Von Gunten, U. Quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) for the transformation of organic micropollutants during oxidative water treatment. Water Res. 2012, 46, 6177–6195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ganiev, I.; Timergazin, Q.; Kabalnova, N.; Shereshovets, V.; Tolstikov, G. Reactions of chlorine dioxide with organic compounds. Eur. Chem.-Technol. J. 2005, 7, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Amor, H.B.; De Laat, J.; Dore, M. Mode d’action du bioxyde de chlore sur les composes organiques en milieu aqueux: Consommations de bioxyde de chlore et reactions sur les composes phenoliques. Water Res. 1984, 18, 1545–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wajon, J.E.; Rosenblatt, D.H.; Burrows, E.P. Oxidation of phenol and hydroquinone by chlorine dioxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1982, 16, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Andrés, C.M.C.; Pérez de la Lastra, J.M.; Juan, C.A.; Plou, F.J.; Pérez-Lebeña, E. Hypochlorous Acid Chemistry in Mammalian Cells—Influence on Infection and Role in Various Pathologies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 10735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lin, X.; Zhang, J.; Luo, X.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, Y. Removal of aniline using lignin grafted acrylic acid from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 172, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Guo, Y.; Xu, J.; Bai, X.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, J. Free chlorine formation in the process of the chlorine dioxide oxidation of aliphatic amines. Water Res. 2022, 217, 118399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hull, L.; Davis, G.; Rosenblatt, D.; Williams, H.; Weglein, R. Oxidations of amines. III. Duality of mechanism in the reaction of amines with chlorine dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rosenblatt, D.; Hull, L.; De Luca, D.; Davis, G.; Weglein, R.; Williams, H. Oxidations of amines. II. Substituent effects in chlorine dioxide oxidations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 1158–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Andrzejewski, P.; Nawrocki, J. N-nitrosodimethylamine formation during treatment with strong oxidants of dimethylamine containing water. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 56, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rosenblatt, D.H.; Hayes, A.J., Jr.; Harrison, B.L.; Streaty, R.A.; Moore, K.A. The reaction of chlorine dioxide with triethylamine in aqueous solution1. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 2790–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Selbes, M.; Kim, D.; Karanfil, T. The effect of pre-oxidation on NDMA formation and the influence of pH. Water Res. 2014, 66, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Lee, C.; Schmidt, C.K.; Yoon, J.; von Gunten, U. Oxidation of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) precursors with ozone and chlorine dioxide: Kinetics and effect on NDMA formation potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2056–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Yakupov, M.Z.; Shereshovets, V.V.; Imashev, U.B.; Ismagilov, F.R. Liquid-phase oxidation of thiols with chlorine dioxide. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2001, 50, 2352–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tan, H.; Wheeler, W.B.; Wei, C.I. Reaction of chlorine dioxide with amino acids and peptides: Kinetics and mutagenicity studies. Mutat. Res. 1987, 188, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ison, A.; Odeh, I.N.; Margerum, D.W. Kinetics and mechanisms of chlorine dioxide and chlorite oxidations of cysteine and glutathione. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 8768–8775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Darkwa, J.; Olojo, R.O.; Chikwana, E.; Simoyi, R.H. Antioxidant Chemistry: Oxidation of l-Cysteine and Its Metabolites by Chlorite and Chlorine Dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 5576–5587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Napolitano, M.J.; Green, B.J.; Nicoson, J.S.; Margerum, D.W. Chlorine dioxide oxidations of tyrosine, N-acetyltyrosine, and dopa. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, 501–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Stewart, D.J.; Napolitano, M.J.; Bakhmutova-Albert, E.V.; Margerum, D.W. Kinetics and mechanisms of chlorine dioxide oxidation of tryptophan. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 1639–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ogata, N. Denaturation of protein by chlorine dioxide: Oxidative modification of tryptophan and tyrosine residues. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 4898–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Noss, C.I.; Hauchman, F.S.; Olivieri, V.P. Chlorine dioxide reactivity with proteins. Water Res. 1986, 20, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rougé, V. Chlorine Dioxide Oxidation in Water Treatment: Impact on Natural Organic Matter Characteristics, Disinfection Byproducts and Comparison with Other Oxidants; Curtin University: Bentley, WA, Australia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  101. Bakhmutova-Albert, E.V.; Margerum, D.W.; Auer, J.G.; Applegate, B.M. Chlorine dioxide oxidation of dihydronicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 2205–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Bryan, R.F. Biochemistry. Second Edition by D. Voet and J. G. Voet. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D-Biol. Crystallogr. 1996, 52, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rubio-Casillas, A.; Cambra-Madrid, P. Farmacocinética y farmacodinamia del dióxido de cloro. E-CUCBA 2021, 16, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Moore, G.S.; Calabrese, E.J.; DiNardi, S.; Tuthill, R.W. Potential health effects of chlorine dioxide as a disinfectant in potable water supplies. Med. Hypotheses 1978, 4, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hagiwara, Y.; Inoue, N. First case of methemoglobinemia caused by a ClO2-based household product. Pediatr. Int. 2015, 57, 1182–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Romanovsky, A.; Djogovic, D.; Chin, D. A Case of Sodium Chlorite Toxicity Managed with Concurrent Renal Replacement Therapy and Red Cell Exchange. J. Med. Toxicol. 2012, 9, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Chejfec-Ciociano, J.M.; Martínez-Herrera, J.P.; Parra-Guerra, A.D.; Chejfec, R.; Barbosa-Camacho, F.J.; Ibarrola-Peña, J.C.; Cervantes-Guevara, G.; Cervantes-Cardona, G.A.; Fuentes-Orozco, C.; Cervantes-Pérez, E. Misinformation About and Interest in Chlorine Dioxide During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico Identified Using Google Trends Data: Infodemiology Study. JMIR Infodemiol. 2022, 2, e29894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Mostajo-Radji, M.A. Pseudoscience in the times of crisis: How and why chlorine dioxide consumption became popular in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Political Sci. 2021, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Burela, A.; Hernández-Vásquez, A.; Comandé, D.; Peralta, V.; Fiestas, F. Dióxido de cloro y derivados del cloro para prevenir o tratar la COVID-19: Revisión sistemática. Rev. Peru. De Med. Exp. Y Salud Pública 2021, 37, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Soriano-Moreno, D.R.; Fernandez-Guzman, D.; Ccami-Bernal, F.; Rojas-Miliano, C.; Nieto-Gutierrez, W. Factors associated with the consumption of chlorine dioxide to prevent and treat COVID-19 in the Peruvian population: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. 111. La AEMPS Advierte de los Riesgos Graves Para la Salud por el Consumo de Dióxido de Cloro o MMS. Agencia Española De Medicam. Y Prod. Sanit. (AEMPS). 2020. Available online: https://www.aemps.gob.es/informa/la-aemps-advierte-de-los-riesgos-graves-para-la-salud-por-el-consumo-de-dioxido-de-cloro-o-mms/ (accessed on 25 October 2022).
  112. Vincenti, S.; de Waure, C.; Raponi, M.; Teleman, A.A.; Boninti, F.; Bruno, S.; Boccia, S.; Damiani, G.; Laurenti, P. Environmental surveillance of Legionella spp. colonization in the water system of a large academic hospital: Analysis of the four-year results on the effectiveness of the chlorine dioxide disinfection method. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Southwell, K.L. Chlorine Dioxide Dry Fumigation in Special Collection Libraries. Libr. Arch. Secur. 2003, 18, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Buttner, M.P.; Cruz, P.; Stetzenbach, L.D.; Klima-Comba, A.K.; Stevens, V.L.; Cronin, T. Determination of the Efficacy of Two Building Decontamination Strategies by Surface Sampling with Culture and Quantitative PCR Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4740–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Hubbard, H.; Poppendieck, D.; Corsi, R.L. Chlorine dioxide reactions with indoor materials during building disinfection: Surface uptake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 1329–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wilson, S.C.; Wu, C.; Andriychuk, L.A.; Martín, J.M.; Brasel, T.L.; Jumper, C.A.; Straus, D.C. Effect of Chlorine Dioxide Gas on Fungi and Mycotoxins Associated with Sick Building Syndrome. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 5399–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Haynes, W.M. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  118. Lowe, J.J.; Gibbs, S.G.; Iwen, P.C.; Smith, P.W.; Hewlett, A.L. Impact of chlorine dioxide gas sterilization on nosocomial organism viability in a hospital room. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 2596–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Burela, A.; Hernández-Vásquez, A.; Comandé, D.; Peralta, V.; Fiestas, F. Chlorine dioxide and chlorine derivatives for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review. Rev. Peru. De Med. Exp. Y Salud Publica 2021, 37, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Silva, A.A.; Orantes, L.D.C.; Enriquez, K.O.G.; Perez, F.S.P.; Basilio, A.; Jimenez, Y.L.C.; Díaz-Gutiérrez, S.P. Chemical pneumonitis secondary to chlorine dioxide consumption in a patient with severe Covid-19. Platelets 2020, 280, 261000. [Google Scholar]
  121. Lardieri, A.; Cheng, C.; Jones, S.C.; McCulley, L. Harmful effects of chlorine dioxide exposure. Clin. Toxicol. 2021, 59, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Applications of chlorine dioxide.
Figure 1. Applications of chlorine dioxide.
Ijms 23 15660 g001
Figure 2. (a) The molecular structure of ClO2. (b) The Lewis structure of ClO2.
Figure 2. (a) The molecular structure of ClO2. (b) The Lewis structure of ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g002
Figure 3. ClO2 preparation methods.
Figure 3. ClO2 preparation methods.
Ijms 23 15660 g003
Figure 4. Preparation of chlorine dioxide from sodium chlorite.
Figure 4. Preparation of chlorine dioxide from sodium chlorite.
Ijms 23 15660 g004
Figure 5. Preparation of chlorine dioxide from sodium chlorate.
Figure 5. Preparation of chlorine dioxide from sodium chlorate.
Ijms 23 15660 g005
Figure 6. (a) Reduction of chlorine dioxide with hydrogen peroxide. (b) Reduction mechanism of chlorine dioxide with hydrogen peroxide.
Figure 6. (a) Reduction of chlorine dioxide with hydrogen peroxide. (b) Reduction mechanism of chlorine dioxide with hydrogen peroxide.
Ijms 23 15660 g006
Figure 7. ClO2 as an oxidizing and reducing agent.
Figure 7. ClO2 as an oxidizing and reducing agent.
Ijms 23 15660 g007
Figure 8. Molar stoichiometry from ClO2 to ClO2.
Figure 8. Molar stoichiometry from ClO2 to ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g008
Figure 9. Mechanism of formation of equimolar amounts of ClO2 and ClO3 from ClO2 in basic medium.
Figure 9. Mechanism of formation of equimolar amounts of ClO2 and ClO3 from ClO2 in basic medium.
Ijms 23 15660 g009
Figure 10. Mechanism of formation of ClO2 from ClO2 in basic medium.
Figure 10. Mechanism of formation of ClO2 from ClO2 in basic medium.
Ijms 23 15660 g010
Figure 11. Mechanism of the formation of equimolar amounts of ClO2 and ClO3 from Cl2O4 in basic medium.
Figure 11. Mechanism of the formation of equimolar amounts of ClO2 and ClO3 from Cl2O4 in basic medium.
Ijms 23 15660 g011
Figure 12. First order disproportionation reaction in [ClO2].
Figure 12. First order disproportionation reaction in [ClO2].
Ijms 23 15660 g012
Figure 13. Pathway 2 is also first order in [ClO2] but forms ClO2 as the only chlorine-containing product.
Figure 13. Pathway 2 is also first order in [ClO2] but forms ClO2 as the only chlorine-containing product.
Ijms 23 15660 g013
Figure 14. Pathway 3 is second order in [ClO2] and generates equal amounts of ClO2 and ClO3.
Figure 14. Pathway 3 is second order in [ClO2] and generates equal amounts of ClO2 and ClO3.
Ijms 23 15660 g014
Figure 15. Effect of the OX hypohalite ion on the disproportionation of ClO2 in basic solution.
Figure 15. Effect of the OX hypohalite ion on the disproportionation of ClO2 in basic solution.
Ijms 23 15660 g015
Figure 16. Formation of XOClO2.
Figure 16. Formation of XOClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g016
Figure 17. Hydrolysis of XOClO2 in basic medium to produce ClO3 and OX.
Figure 17. Hydrolysis of XOClO2 in basic medium to produce ClO3 and OX.
Ijms 23 15660 g017
Figure 18. The homolysis of ClO2 in neutral aqueous solution.
Figure 18. The homolysis of ClO2 in neutral aqueous solution.
Ijms 23 15660 g018
Figure 19. Homolysis of ClO2 by thermal route or with irradiation.
Figure 19. Homolysis of ClO2 by thermal route or with irradiation.
Ijms 23 15660 g019
Figure 20. The photolysis of dry, gaseous ClO2.
Figure 20. The photolysis of dry, gaseous ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g020
Figure 21. The photochemistry and radical chemistry of photolysis of ClO2 by UVC light.
Figure 21. The photochemistry and radical chemistry of photolysis of ClO2 by UVC light.
Ijms 23 15660 g021
Figure 22. The generated ClO, O(3P), and Cl undergo chain reactions to generate secondary reactive species.
Figure 22. The generated ClO, O(3P), and Cl undergo chain reactions to generate secondary reactive species.
Ijms 23 15660 g022
Figure 23. Chlorite and chlorate from the radical-radical interactions.
Figure 23. Chlorite and chlorate from the radical-radical interactions.
Ijms 23 15660 g023
Figure 24. ClO2 oxidizes Fe(II) and Mn(II) via rapid one-electron transfer.
Figure 24. ClO2 oxidizes Fe(II) and Mn(II) via rapid one-electron transfer.
Ijms 23 15660 g024
Figure 25. ClO2 oxidizes to I to I2.
Figure 25. ClO2 oxidizes to I to I2.
Ijms 23 15660 g025
Figure 26. Oxidation of nitrite NO2 by ClO2.
Figure 26. Oxidation of nitrite NO2 by ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g026
Figure 27. Reaction of hydrogen peroxide with chlorine dioxide.
Figure 27. Reaction of hydrogen peroxide with chlorine dioxide.
Ijms 23 15660 g027
Figure 28. Reaction of ozone with ClO2.
Figure 28. Reaction of ozone with ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g028
Figure 29. Oxidation of phenols and chlorophenols by reacting with ClO2. In red, end products.
Figure 29. Oxidation of phenols and chlorophenols by reacting with ClO2. In red, end products.
Ijms 23 15660 g029
Figure 30. Mechanism of oxidation of phenols with ClO2.
Figure 30. Mechanism of oxidation of phenols with ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g030
Figure 31. Formation of chloroquinones in the oxidation of phenols with chlorine dioxide.
Figure 31. Formation of chloroquinones in the oxidation of phenols with chlorine dioxide.
Ijms 23 15660 g031
Figure 32. Mechanism for the oxidation of aromatic amines with ClO2.
Figure 32. Mechanism for the oxidation of aromatic amines with ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g032
Figure 33. Reactivity of cysteine, tyrosine, tryptophan histidine, and proline with ClO2.
Figure 33. Reactivity of cysteine, tyrosine, tryptophan histidine, and proline with ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g033
Figure 34. Reaction rate constants of ClO2 with amino acids at 25 °C [7].
Figure 34. Reaction rate constants of ClO2 with amino acids at 25 °C [7].
Ijms 23 15660 g034
Figure 35. Reaction rate constants of ClO2 with amino acids at 25 °C.
Figure 35. Reaction rate constants of ClO2 with amino acids at 25 °C.
Ijms 23 15660 g035
Figure 36. At acidic pH, cysteine sulfonic acid was produced. At alkaline pH, cystine was obtained.
Figure 36. At acidic pH, cysteine sulfonic acid was produced. At alkaline pH, cystine was obtained.
Ijms 23 15660 g036
Figure 37. Proposed mechanism for the reactions between ClO2 and cysteine.
Figure 37. Proposed mechanism for the reactions between ClO2 and cysteine.
Ijms 23 15660 g037
Figure 38. Reaction pathways proposed for ClO2 oxidation of the amino acid tyrosine.
Figure 38. Reaction pathways proposed for ClO2 oxidation of the amino acid tyrosine.
Ijms 23 15660 g038
Figure 39. Proposed reaction mechanism for the attack of ClO2 to tryptophane.
Figure 39. Proposed reaction mechanism for the attack of ClO2 to tryptophane.
Ijms 23 15660 g039
Figure 40. Stoichiometry of the reaction between tryptophan and ClO2.
Figure 40. Stoichiometry of the reaction between tryptophan and ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g040
Figure 41. Reaction of NADH with ClO2.
Figure 41. Reaction of NADH with ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g041
Figure 42. Proposed mechanism of NADH oxidation by ClO2.
Figure 42. Proposed mechanism of NADH oxidation by ClO2.
Ijms 23 15660 g042
Figure 43. Methemoglobinemia pathology.
Figure 43. Methemoglobinemia pathology.
Ijms 23 15660 g043
Figure 44. The main routes of ClO2 poisoning.
Figure 44. The main routes of ClO2 poisoning.
Ijms 23 15660 g044
Figure 45. Serious adverse reactions after direct consumption of chlorine dioxide.
Figure 45. Serious adverse reactions after direct consumption of chlorine dioxide.
Ijms 23 15660 g045
Figure 46. ClO2 antimicrobial spectrum of activity.
Figure 46. ClO2 antimicrobial spectrum of activity.
Ijms 23 15660 g046
Figure 47. Reduction of chlorine dioxide.
Figure 47. Reduction of chlorine dioxide.
Ijms 23 15660 g047
Table 1. Constants determined for ClO2 reactions with phenols.
Table 1. Constants determined for ClO2 reactions with phenols.
Compound Solvent pH T °C K (M−1 s−1 )
Phenoxide ion H2O 234.9 × 107
Phenol H2O 0.24
2-Chlorophenoxide ion H2O2–5233.5 x 107
2-Chlorophenol H2O2–5231.5
Table 2. Second-order rate constants for reactions of chlorine dioxide with aliphatic amines.
Table 2. Second-order rate constants for reactions of chlorine dioxide with aliphatic amines.
Compound pH T °C K (M−1 s−1 ) Refs
Benzylamine8.9625.04.1 × 10−2 [86]
Benzyl-tert-butylamine8.425.02.9 × 102 [86]
N,N- dimethy-3-methoxybenzylamine 27.02.9 × 104 [87]
Methylamine7–1025.0<1 [85]
Dimethylamine6.8–9.324.05 × 102 [88]
Trimethylamine 23.06 × 104 [89]
Table 3. Constants determined for ClO2 reactions with peptides and proteins.
Table 3. Constants determined for ClO2 reactions with peptides and proteins.
Compound pH T °C K (M−1 s−1 )
Peptides
Glutathione5.925.01.4 × 108
Proteins
Bovine serum albumin7.025.06.4
Glucosa-6-fosfato deshidrogenasa7.025.09.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andrés, C.M.C.; Lastra, J.M.P.d.l.; Andrés Juan, C.; Plou, F.J.; Pérez-Lebeña, E. Chlorine Dioxide: Friend or Foe for Cell Biomolecules? A Chemical Approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660

AMA Style

Andrés CMC, Lastra JMPdl, Andrés Juan C, Plou FJ, Pérez-Lebeña E. Chlorine Dioxide: Friend or Foe for Cell Biomolecules? A Chemical Approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(24):15660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andrés, Celia María Curieses, José Manuel Pérez de la Lastra, Celia Andrés Juan, Francisco J. Plou, and Eduardo Pérez-Lebeña. 2022. "Chlorine Dioxide: Friend or Foe for Cell Biomolecules? A Chemical Approach" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 24: 15660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660

APA Style

Andrés, C. M. C., Lastra, J. M. P. d. l., Andrés Juan, C., Plou, F. J., & Pérez-Lebeña, E. (2022). Chlorine Dioxide: Friend or Foe for Cell Biomolecules? A Chemical Approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(24), 15660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415660

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop