Next Article in Journal
The Non-Specific Lethal (NSL) Histone Acetyltransferase Complex Transcriptionally Regulates Yin Yang 1-Mediated Cell Proliferation in Human Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
The Therapeutic Potential of Exosomes in Soft Tissue Repair and Regeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Transdermal Delivery of Indirubin-Loaded Microemulsion Gel: Preparation, Characterization and Anti-Psoriatic Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermally Stable and Reusable Ceramic Encapsulated and Cross-Linked CalB Enzyme Particles for Rapid Hydrolysis and Esterification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Co3O4 Nanoparticles Uniformly Dispersed in Rational Porous Carbon Nano-Boxes for Significantly Enhanced Electrocatalytic Detection of H2O2 Released from Living Cells

1
Key Laboratory of Luminescence Analysis and Molecular Sensing, Ministry of Education, Institute for Clean Energy and Advanced Materials, School of Materials and Energy, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
Institute for Materials Science and Devices, School of Material Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215011, China
3
Institute of Advanced Cross-Field Science and College of Life Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(7), 3799; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073799
Submission received: 8 February 2022 / Revised: 10 March 2022 / Accepted: 14 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioinspired Functional Materials for Biomedical Applications)

Abstract

:
A facile and ingenious method to chemical etching-coordinating a metal-organic framework (MOF) followed by an annealing treatment was proposed to prepare Co3O4 nanoparticles uniformly dispersed in rational porous carbon nano-boxes (Co3O4@CNBs), which was further used to detect H2O2 released from living cells. The Co3O4@CNBs H2O2 sensor delivers much higher sensitivity than non-etching/coordinating Co3O4, offering a limit of detection of 2.32 nM. The wide working range covers 10 nM-359 μM H2O2, while possessing good selectivity and excellent reproducibility. Moreover, this biosensor was used to successfully real-time detect H2O2 released from living cells, including both healthy and tumor cells. The excellent performance holds great promise for Co3O4@CNBs’s applications in electrochemical biomimetic sensing, particularly real-time monitor H2O2 released from living cells.

1. Introduction

H2O2 is a reactive oxygen species (ROS) frequently used as a marker for oxidative stress analysis. It is a by-product of reactions catalyzed by most oxidase enzymes [1], and is also involved in numerous physiological processes including cell differentiation and mediating immune responses [2,3]. Excess H2O2 will attack methionine residues and cysteine, which will cause cell damage and cytotoxicity. Owing to its peculiar capability, the concentration of H2O2 can be used as an indicator of several diseases diagnoses, such as Parkinson’s disease [4,5], cancer [6,7], diabetes [8] and acute myocardial infarction [9]. Thus, the determination of H2O2 is of great significance in biomedical, industrial, and academic applications. The H2O2 levels in the intracellular physiology range are from 0.001 to 0.7 μM [10]. Therefore, sensors with high sensitivity, specificity and broad working range are needed to probe the intracellular H2O2. The excellent detection of H2O2 mainly depends on the detection method and material two aspects. Among the technique for accurate and reliable detection of cellular H2O2, such as colorimetry [11,12], fluorescence [13,14], chromatography [15] and chemiluminescence [16], electrochemical techniques increasingly attracted attention due to their high sensitivity, good selectivity, low cost, as well as rapid response. For electrochemical detection, natural enzymes are usually the choice of sensing materials due to their remarkable specificity and high sensitivity in catalyzing the decomposition of H2O2. However, the inherent defect of natural enzymes, such as instability and ease to reduce or even deactivate the activity, limited their further applications [17]. Thus, non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors were proposed to overcome the limitations of natural enzyme sensing platforms [18]. Various nanomaterials have been used in H2O2 sensors, including transition metals oxides (e.g., Fe3O4, Co3O4, NiO, CuO) [19,20,21,22]. Transition metals have multiple oxidation states. They can absorb other substances onto their surface, meanwhile activating them in the process. These good abilities make them an excellent choice in synthesizing nanoenzymes [1]. Among these materials, Co3O4, a kind of intrinsic p-type transition metal oxide, was reported in electrochemically detecting H2O2 because of its high electrochemical stability, fair price, and environmentally friendly [23]. However, the close-packed structures and poor electronic conductivity of Co3O4 could reduce their specific surface area and deteriorate its performance in H2O2 detection.
Metal-organic framework (MOF) possesses the periodic network structures made by the self-assembly of organic linkers and inorganic metal-containing nodes [24]. Recently, the unique merits of crystalline porous structure, highly dispersed metal components, and adjustable pore size of MOFs grant them outstanding performances in various applications [25]. In addition, MOF-derived carbon materials overcome the aggregation of metal nanoparticles that is induced by a further pyrolysis process [26]. Hence, metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived Co3O4 are promising in synthesis Co3O4 with uniform morphology and good electronic conductivity.
Tannic acid (TA) is a plant polyphenol. The chemical structure of TA is usually a decagalloyl glucose (C76H52O46) [27]. It widely exists in plant tissues such as tea, wood, and wine [28]. Its adhesive and reduction capability have been demonstrated in materials synthesis for lithium-ion batteries [29,30], dye remove [31], oil/water separation [32], catalytic [33], cell proliferation [34] and drug delivery [35]. As a kind of phenolic acid, TA is a weak organic acid and can release protons [36], which is applied in etching MOF materials to synthesize hollow structured materials [37].
In this study, to achieve sensitive and specific H2O2 detection, we rationally designed an ingenious method to synthesize ZIF-67 MOF-derived Co3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) dispersing in porous carbon nano-box (Co3O4 @CNBs) as a H2O2 nanozyme. The function of TA is to etch ZIF-67 while preserving the overall cubic architectures during thermal annealing process. The Co3O4 nanoparticles uniformly dispersed in porous carbon nano-boxes (Co3O4@CNBs) was synthesized by delicately tuning TA concentration and thermal annealing temperature. The sensing performance of Co3O4@CNBs in H2O2 sensing was characterized. The dispersion of Co3O4 NPs in the porous carbon nano-boxes (CNBs) was further investigated for its enhancement mechanism toward the specific reduction of H2O2. Moreover, the application of the Co3O4@CNBs H2O2 sensor was demonstrated in detecting H2O2 released from living cells.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

All of the chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received. The aqueous solutions were prepared with ultra-pure water (>18.25 MΩ/cm) obtained from Q-Grad®1 system (Millipore Corporation, Burlington, MA, USA). Cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (Co(NO3)2•6H2O), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), 2-methylimidazole (2-MeIm), tannic acid (TA), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), glucose (Glu), cysteine (Cys), dopamine (DA), uric acid (UA), ascorbic acid (AA), glycine(Gly), sucrose (SUC), glutathione (GSH), urea and catalase from bovine liver were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) and Nafion (5%, wt %), were ordered from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China). Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was purchased from Dingguo (Beijing, China). Human non-small cell lung cancer A549, mouse breast cancer cells 4T1, and human umbilical vein endothelial HUVEC cell lines were obtained from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) medium, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1× antibiotic antimycotic were from Gibco (USA). Thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (Beijing, China).

2.2. Characterizations

The morphologies of the synthesized materials were observed by field emitted scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JSM-7800 F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL, Japan). HAADF-STEM characterization was conducted with TEM (JEM-2100, JEOL, Japan). The surface properties of the materials were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The crystal structure was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, MAXima-X XRD-7000, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The chemical groups of the samples were recorded by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Thermo-Nicolet 6700, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) with air as a reference. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, TA Instruments Q50, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) was performed using a thermal analyzer under airflow (10 °C min−1). JW-BK300C (JWGB SCI. & TECH., Beijing, China) determined N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore-size distributions. All electrochemical measurements were performed at room temperature on a CHI 760D (Chenhua Instruments, Shanghai, China). PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7.4) was used as the electrolyte for all electrochemical measures except in detection with cell viability.

2.3. Preparation Co3O4@CNBs from ZIF-67

Synthesis of Co3O4@CNBs involves the following three-steps:
Synthesis of ZIF-67 nanocubes (ZIF-67 NCs): ZIF-67 NCs were synthesized according to the previous works [38]. 580 mg of Co(NO3)2•6H2O and 4 mg of etyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) were dissolved in 20 mL of deionized water and marked as solution A. 9.08 g of 2-methyimidazole (2-MIM) was dissolved in 140 mL of deionized water, and marked as a solution B. Then the 20 mL solution A was rapidly injected into 140 mL solution B and stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The collected precipitate (ZIF-67 NCs) was washed with ethanol several times and then dried in an oven at dried at 60 °C for 24 h.
Synthesis of TA-Co nano boxes (TA-Co NBs): The as-prepared ZIF-67 NCs were first dispersed into 10 mL of ethanol, then poured into 150 mL of ethanol and deionized water mixture solution (Volume ratio of H2O and ethanol = 1:1) containing different concentration of TA solution (0 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL) and stirred at room temperature for 5 min. The precipitate collected by centrifugation was washed with ethanol and then dried in an oven at dried at 60 °C for 24 h. The TA etched ZIF-67 was recorded as TA-Co nano boxes (TA-Co NBs).
Synthesis of Co3O4@CNBs: The as-prepared TA-Co NBs powder was first annealed at 200 °C for 30 min and then further annealed at different temperatures (500 °C, 600 °C, 700 °C, 800 °C) for 1 h with a heating rate of 1 °C min−1 under N2 flow, and cooled down to room temperature naturally. After that, the powder was annealed at 200 °C for 6 h in air with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1. The obtained materials named as Co3O4@CNBs. In comparison, pristine ZIF-67 without TA etching was thermally annealed with the same condition and recorded as Co3O4@carbon (Co3O4@C).

2.4. Preparation of Co3O4@CNBs Modified Electrode

All electrochemical measurements were performed on a CHI 760D electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Instruments, China). A conventional three-electrode cell was used with a modified glass carbon electrode as the working electrode, Ag/AgCl (in saturated KCl solution) as the reference electrode, and platinum wire as the counter electrode. Glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) were polished with 0.3 and 0.05 μm alumina slurry on a polishing cloth and cleaned sequentially through water and ethanol under sonication for 3 min and dried in nitrogen flow for further use. Next, 7 μL 2 mg/mL Co3O4@CNBs aqueous dispersion was dropped on it and dried for 3 h at room temperature. After that, 5 μL 0.05% Nafion were dropped on it successively and dried at room temperature. Nafion film acts as a protective layer, preventing the falling of the loaded Co3O4@CNBs from the electrode. The supporting electrolyte of PBS (0.01 M, pH = 7.4) was deoxygenated using nitrogen before use and kept inside a nitrogen atmosphere. The prepared working electrodes were activated by cyclic voltammetric (CV) scanning for 20 cycles in the potential range from −1.0 to 1.0 V at a scan rate of 50 mV·s−1. Amperometric current-time curves (i-t) were collected at −0.22 V in 0.01 M 10 mL PBS by successive injecting H2O2 at 50 s intervals.

2.5. Detection of H2O2 Released from Living Cells

In this work, three types of living human cells, A549, 4T1 and HUVEC cell were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS, 1 × antibiotic antimycotic. All the cells were supplemented with 10% FBS in a humidified incubator (with 5% CO2 atmosphere) at 37 °C and grown in polystyrene-coated T25 (25 cm2) cell culture flasks. Cells were washed three times with 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4), detached by 1% Trypsin, collected by centrifugation, and the number was calculated using a cell counter. The response of H2O2 released from approximately 1.0 × 105 cells was measured by Co3O4@CNBs modified GCE at −0.22 V in 2 mL DMEM medium.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Co3O4 NPs Dispersed in Porous Carbon Nano Boxes by TA Assisted Etchings

Synthesis of Co3O4@CNBs involves the following three-step reaction (Scheme 1). First, ZIF-67 was synthesized by using the co-precipitation method [38]. Next, TA was used to etch the ZIF-67 to form the unique Co3O4 NBs. Last, the Co3O4 NBs were thermal annealed to carbonize the TA and subsequent low-temperature oxidation in the air to form Co3O4@CNBs. The FESEM characterization found that the co-precipitation method synthesized ZIF-67 is uniform regular cubic with a smooth surface (Supplementary Information Figure S1). The size of the cubic is about 760 nm. In our approach, TA functions as green and facile etching agent to etch ZIF-67 directly without extra procedures and chemicals. We found that TA (0.5 mg/mL, 1.0 mg/mL, 2.0 mg/mL) treatment did not change the overall size and the surface morphology of the ZIF-67 cubic. As compared in in FESEM characterization (Figure 1A), TA treated ZIF-67 cubic has a size of 760 nm with a smooth surface. However, TEM characterization (Figure 1B) reveals that the cubic’s inner structure changes significantly after treated by TA with different concentrations. Though TA etched the inside of ZIF-67 cubic, the wall thickness of the cubic had no significant difference as TA concentration changed. The main effect of TA concentration influences the degree of etching reaction inside the cubic. As shown in Figure 1B, with the TA concentration increase from 0 to 2 mg/mL TA, the inside of ZIF-67 was solid at first and then showed the yolk-shelled heterogeneous structure. Finally, the ZIF-67 cubic was completely etched to form hollow interior TA-Co NBs (Figure 1B). Incubating ZIF-67 cubic in 2 mg/mL TA solution for 5 min resulted in a ZIF-67 NB with a wall thickness of about 80 nm.
The TA etching reaction is illustrated in Supplementary Information Figure S2. First, the protons released from TA etch the ZIF-67, releasing the Co2+ and 2-MIM simultaneously. At the same time, Co2+ and TA coordinate together quickly to form the TA-Co shell. The attached TA block the exposed surface of ZIF-67, thus protecting the outer parts of MOFs from further etching, resulting in internal etching of the ZIF-67 to form TA-Co NBs [29,37,39].
Next, TA-Co NBs were carbonized in an N2 atmosphere to synthesize the Co3O4@CNBs. First, the thermal carbonization and subsequent low-temperature oxidation in air at 200 °C were conducted with ZIF-67 cubic without TA treatment. From the SEM images in Figure 2, we found that even though the ZIF-67 is solid cubic, the thermal annealing still caused the shrink towards the inner side at the middle portion of each side. The morphology and structure have undergone apparent changes to a certain extent. This phenomenon is in line with previous studies in which ZIF-67 crystals obtained by direct annealing methods usually have a rough surface because of the aggregation of the nanoparticles [20,40,41,42]. However, as the FESEM images shown in Figure 2, the TA-Co NBs lost their structural integrity when the thermal carbonization was conducted at 500 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C. Uniform cubic structures were observed from the products obtained at 700 °C. The SEM characterized morphology in Figure 2 confirms that TA-assisted etching successfully avoids the high-temperature carbonization induced cubic shrink. We speculated that the thermal carbonization caused structure changes could be induced by the partial collapse of pores on the nano-boxes. We examined the porosity of the products obtained from different temperatures. From the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms curves shown in Figure 3, the porosity of Co3O4@CNBs obtained at 500, 600, 700, and 800 °C was 18.9 m2/g, 255.9 m2/g, 297.2 m2/g, 107.6 m2/g, respectively. The highest BET surface area is from the Co3O4@CNBs obtained at 700 °C. According to the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, the adsorption isotherm for 500 °C and 600 °C were similar to a BET type II isotherm. While 700 °C and 800 °C appears the BET type IV shape adsorption according to BET classification. It is worth noting that, as shown in Figure 2, materials at 800 °C has shown the collapse of the cubics. Collectively, the SEM (Figure 2) and BET results suggested that the intact cubic after annealing at 700 °C benefit the preserving of nano-pores on the nano box.
The structures of Co3O4@C and Co3O4@CNBs were further compared through TEM characterization. Thermal annealing action caused the shrink of ZIF-67, resulting in a quadrangular star shape (Figure 4A). From the HRTEM characterization, the (111) planes of the metallic Co can be differentiated from the packed Co3O4 NPs (Figure 4B). The HAADF-STEM images (Figure 4C) and the corresponding elemental mapping images of C, Co, O, N elements in Co3O4@C (Figure 4D) clearly show the shrinking towards the inside at the four corners, and the inside of the cubic packed with dense and aggregated Co3O4 NPs. In comparison, with the action of TA, the dispersed Co3O4 was preserved nicely within the nano box (Figure 4E). HRTEM image of Co3O4@CNBs in Figure 4F shows the lattice fringe spacing is about 0.20 nm, corresponding to the (111) planes of Co3O4. The HAADF-STEM images of Co3O4@CNBs (Figure 4G) and the corresponding elemental mapping images of C, Co, O, N elements in Co3O4@CNBs (Figure 4H) confirmed that the Co3O4 NPs are highly dispersed in nano box. The evenly distributed C element would ensure electron transfer during electrochemical detection. The C, Co, O, N elements mapping images of Co3O4@CNBs thermal annealed at 500 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C were shown in Supplementary Information Figure S3. From the FESEM and elements mapping, we confirmed that the C and Co are evenly distributed on the cubic. As the temperature increases, the structure gradually collapses at 800 °C.
Apart from tracking the reaction by morphological characterization (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4), the crystalline materials were characterized by XRD, FTIR, and XPS. First, the C 1s, Co 2p peaks can be observed from the XRD spectra, confirming the success in synthesis ZIF-67 (Figure 5A). The ZIF-67 precursor completely disappears after TA etching, indicating the completion of chemical transformation. Diffraction peaks of Co3O4@CNBs in XRD characterization perfectly match with the standard patterns of Co3O4 (PDF # 42-1467). The FTIR spectrum also supports the formation of Co3O4 (Figure 5B). FTIR spectrum shows that the prominent peaks at 3400 cm−1 are attributed to the vibration and stretching bands of functional groups of TA, which on account of TA complete substitution of 2-methylimidazole during the etching process [37]. Another strong bands at 667 cm−1 is attributed to the stretching vibration mode of Co-O with Co2+ [40].
XPS analysis was applied to reveal the elemental valence state of the Co3O4@CNBs. Compared with ZIF-67, TA-Co NBs present observable changes in C and Co’s contents, which are attributed to the introduction of TA and pyrolysis of organic ligands. As shown in Figure 5C, the spectrum of Co 2p can be best-fitted with two prominent peaks at binding energies by Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2 peaks located at around 780.3 and 795.1 eV, corresponding to the state of Co3O4 phase. According to the XPS analysis (Figure 5D), the appearance of C=O, C-O, and C-C in a high-resolution spectrum of C 1 s are caused by the structure of TA [41]. As shown in Supplementary Information Figure S4, the TGA analysis reveals the weight content of Co3O4 in the composite is about 46.3 wt%. The weight loss under 250 °C is attributed to the evaporation of water molecules and air absorbed by the sample surface [42]. By analyzing FESEM, TEM, XRD, XPS, and FTIR results, we confirmed that Co3O4 nanoparticles well dispersed in Co3O4@CNBs synthesized from 2 mg/mL TA etching.

3.2. Dispersed Co3O4 NPs in Porous Carbon Nano Box Facilitate the Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of H2O2

CV measurements were conducted to compare the electrochemical performance of carbonized ZIF-67 (Co3O4@C) and Co3O4@CNBs modified glassy carbon electrode (Co3O4@C/GCE and Co3O4@CNBs/GCE) in H2O2 detection. In Figure 6A, the dotted line and solid line represent the Co3O4@C/GCE and Co3O4@CNBs/GCE, respectively. The blue and purple lines represent the absence and addition of H2O2, respectively. With the addition of 2 mM H2O2, a cathode current around the potential of −0.22 V can be observed clearly from Co3O4@CNBs/GCE. In contrast, as shown in Figure 6A, no noticeable change was observed from Co3O4@C/GCE, indicating that Co3O4@C is inactive for electrooxidation of H2O2. Figure 6B displays the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of Co3O4@CNBs modified GCE in 10 mL 0.01 M PBS solution (pH 7.4) in the absence and presence of different concentrations of H2O2 (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mM). With the increasing concentrations of H2O2, a noticeable reduction peak current around −0.22 V dramatically increased. According to the previous reports, the electrocatalysis of H2O2 on the Co3O4@CNBs can be expressed by the following equation [43]:
2 Co ( II ) + H 2 O 2 + H 2 O 2 Co ( III ) + 2 OH + H 2 O
The obvious reduction current indicated that Co3O4@CNBs nanocomposite have an excellent electrocatalytic activity for H2O2. The CV curves of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE were collected at different scan rates between −0.8 and 0.2 V in 0.01 M PBS (pH = 7.4). The reduction peak currents were enhanced with increasing scan rates. The current was in good linear with the scan rates (Figure 6C), suggesting that the H2O2 reduction on the Co3O4@CNBs/GCE’s surface was a typical adsorption control process.
The different performance between Co3O4@C and Co3O4@CNBs towards H2O2 sensing is discussed. The thermal annealing and subsequent low-temperature oxidation will cause the four edges to shrink inward pristine ZIF-67 (Figure 4A,C). The structural changes are accompanied by the decrease of porosity (Supplementary Information Figure S5) because the porosity of Co3O4@C is 149.5 m2/g which is significantly smaller than that of Co3O4@CNBs (297.2 m2/g). Furthermore, the obvious aggregated Co3O4 nanoparticles in Co3O4@C (Figure 4A–C) impact the available sites of Co3O4 to react with H2O2 and potentially reduce the specific reaction area contributing to the electrochemical reduction of H2O2 (Scheme 2A). For the Co3O4@CNBs obtained from TA etching, the TA layer balanced the shrinkage stresses at different directions applied on the cubic during the annealing process. The architecture integrity avoids pore-collapse induced Co3O4 NPs aggregation (BET data in Figure 3 and TEM data in Figure 4). The porous structures would facilitate the transportation of H2O2 into the Co3O4@CNBs during electrochemical measurement. In addition, the TA protective layer alleviated the “stresses induced orientation contraction”, ensuring the uniform disperse of Co3O4 in CNBs to react with H2O2 (Scheme 2B).

3.3. Analytical Performance of Co3O4@CNBs Based H2O2 Sensors

To construct a sensitive H2O2 sensors, the electrochemical testing condition was optimized. The electrochemical behavior of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE was analyzed in 10 mL 0.01 M PBS (pH = 7.4). It is noted that the CV signal to H2O2 is affected by the concentration of Co3O4@CNBs and the adding volume. Supplementary Information Figure S6A,B show that 7 μL, 2 mg/mL Co3O4@CNBs leads to the highest signal. Hence, 7 μL 2 mg/mL Co3O4@CNBs were employed in the following study. The amperometric technique was employed to measure the response of Co3O4@CNBs modified electrode. The optimal working potential for detecting H2O2 was −0.22 V.
With the optimized Co3O4@CNBs loading and electrochemical working voltage, the sensitivity and working range of the Co3O4@CNBs H2O2 sensor were characterized. The electrochemical response was recorded when successive adding varying H2O2 concentrations into 10 mL 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) solution. As shown in Figure 7A, the response was linear with H2O2 concentrations from 0.01 to 359 μM with a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.995 (insert picture), and the regression equation was I (μA) = −5.42 × 10−6 − 1.28 × 10−6C (μM). The detection limit calculated was 2.32 nM (ratio of signal-to-noise (S/N) = 3). Comparison of Co3O4@CNBs based H2O2 detection with other H2O2 biosensors (Table 1) showed that our electrocatalytic performance of Co3O4@CNBs was satisfactory and even better than previous sensors.
Anti-interference ability is one of the critical analytical indicators for nonenzymatic biosensors. The amperometric method was adopted to study the interference of major interfering substances on Co3O4@CNBs based H2O2 detecting. As shown in Figure 7B, there are negligible signal responding to 0.15 mM glucose (Glu), cysteine (Cys), dopamine (DA), uric acid (UA), ascorbic acid (AA), glycine (Gly), sucrose (SUC), glutathione (GSH), and urea. While 0.05 mM H2O2 can induce a significantly larger signal, suggesting good selectivity for reducing H2O2.
The stability and reproducibility of the Co3O4@CNBs-based sensor were also tested. Supplementary Information Figure S7 shows the amperometric electrochemical response of five modified independent electrodes from different batches. After statistical analysis of the test results, the relative standard deviation (RSD) obtained by five parallel tests was 2.4%, demonstrating a good reproducibility. The actual concentration of H2O2 present and the detected concentration were further tested, and the results in Supplementary Information Table S1 showed that the recovery rate of the Co3O4@CNBs-based sensor is from 95.62% to 105.78%. For the stability experiment, the modified electrode was stored at 4 °C for 15 days, and the current response to H2O2 (2 mM) was recorded every three days. It can be seen that after 15 days of storage, the current response of the sensor is maintained at 92% of the initial current.

3.4. Real-Time Detection of H2O2 Secreted from Living Cells by Co3O4@CNBs

To investigate the capability in actual samples application, Co3O4@CNBs H2O2 sensor was explored to real-time detect H2O2 from the living cell in a culture medium. The response of human epithelial cell HUVEC, mouse breast cancer cell 4T1, and human lung cancer cell A549 to PMA, a diester of phorbol, which can activate many cell types to produce H2O2, was studied. First, the potential cytotoxicity of Co3O4@CNBs was evaluated by the standard MTT assay. Supplementary Information Figure S8 reveals that no significant decrease in cell viability was observed from 10 to 50 μg·mL−1 Co3O4@CNBs-treated HUVEC cells and HeLa cells, demonstrating its good biocompatibility. The response of cells to PMA stimulation was measured by amperometric signal recorded in DMEM at −0.22 V. PMA is an activator widely used in in vitro experiments, which can stimulate cells to produce H2O2. As shown in Figure 8, the current has no obvious change when only cells exist. A promote and sharp increase of current peak was observed from all three cells challenged by 2.5 μg/mL PMA. In contrast, injecting PMA and catalase (CAT), an enzyme that catalyzes the decomposition of H2O2 into water and oxygen, at the same time will demolish the current change, which was observed in only PMA stimulation. Since CAT will decomposite the H2O2 released by PMA treated cells, by adding the PMA and CAT, we confirmed the current changes observed from cell stimulated by PMA only were induced by cell-released H2O2. The amperometric signal (Figure 8) recorded from the cells proves that the Co3O4@CNBs H2O2 sensor can detect the H2O2 released by living cells, highlighting its potential in studying cell metabolism. Next, the actual amount of H2O2 released from living cells was calculated according to the current and the calibration curve shown in Figure 7B. First, the current of the point reaching the plateau was read from the reaction curve. Then the H2O2 amount was calculated by placing the current value into the calibration curve equation. As shown in Figure 8, according to the current change and the calibration curve, the amount from three different cells was calculated at 0.16 μM (HUVEC), 0.26 μM (A549) and 0.19 μM (4T1), respectively.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, Co3O4@CNBs nanocomposites have been prepared using a facile and green method. Their application in the determination of H2O2 has been explored. The used TA improves the materials’ specific surface area and provides more active sites, further enhancing its electrocatalysis to reduce H2O2. The Co3O4@CNBs/GCE exhibits a good selectivity and high sensitivity for the determination of H2O2. Furthermore, the Co3O4@CNBs H2O2 sensor can detect the H2O2 secreted by HUVEC cells and 4T1, A549 cancer cells, highlighting its potential in biosensing and catalysis and biomedicine.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23073799/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.X.; methodology, Y.Z. and L.L.; software, L.X.; validation, L.X.; formal analysis, L.X.; investigation, L.X.; resources, S.W. and F.C.; data curation, L.X.; writing—original draft preparation, L.X.; writing—review and editing, L.Y. and C.L.; supervision, C.L.; funding acquisition, L.Y. and C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31872753), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2021jcyj-bshX0148), the specific research fund of The Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province (YSPTZX202126).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data in the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict to declare.

References

  1. Dhara, K.; Mahapatra, D.R. Recent advances in electrochemical nonenzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensors based on nanomaterials: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 12319–12357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mittler, R. ROS Are Good. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Li, W.; Liu, J.; Chen, C.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, N.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, S. High catalytic performance non-enzymatic H2O2 sensor based on Cu2O@Cu9S5 yolk-shell nanospheres. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 587, 152766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Youdim, M.; Ben-Shachar, D.; Riederer, P. Iron in Brain Function and Dysfunction with Emphasis on Parkinson’s Disease. Eur. Neurol. 1991, 31, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jenner, P.; Dexter, D.T.; Sian, J.; Schapira, A.H.V.; Marsden, C.D. Oxidative Stress as a Cause of Nigral Cell Death in Parkinson’s Disease and Incidental Lewy Body Disease; The Royal Kings and Queens Parkinson’s Disease Research Group: London, UK, 2010; Volume 32, pp. S82–S87. [Google Scholar]
  6. Mohammad, N.S.; Yedluri, R.; Addepalli, P.; Gottumukkala, S.R.; Digumarti, R.R.; Kutala, V.K. Aberrations in one-carbon metabolism induce oxidative DNA damage in sporadic breast cancer. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 349, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Durand, M.; Kolpak, A.; Farrell, T.; Elliott, N.A.; Shao, W.; Brown, M.; Volkert, M.R. The OXR domain defines a conserved family of eukaryotic oxidation resistance proteins. BMC Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Baynes, J.W. Stress, Perspectives in Diabetes Role of Oxidative Stress in Development of Complications in Diabetes. Diabetes 1991, 40, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chambers, J.C.; Seddon, M.D.; Shah, S.; Kooner, J.S. Homocysteine—A novel risk factor for vascular disease. J. R. Soc. Med. 2001, 94, 10–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Miller, E.W.; Dickinson, B.C.; Chang, C.J. Aquaporin-3 mediates hydrogen peroxide uptake to regulate downstream intracellular signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 15681–15686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ahmed, A.; John, P.; Nawaz, M.H.; Hayat, A.; Nasir, M. Zinc-Doped Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Colorimetric Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 5156–5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, X.; Kong, C.; Chen, Z. Colorimetric Sensor Arrays for Antioxidant Discrimination Based on the Inhibition of the Oxidation Reaction between 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine and Hydrogen Peroxides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 9504–9509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, W.-X.; Jiang, W.-L.; Mao, G.-J.; Tan, M.; Fei, J.; Li, Y.; Li, C.-Y. Monitoring the Fluctuation of Hydrogen Peroxide in Diabetes and Its Complications with a Novel Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 3301–3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Song, X.; Bai, S.; He, N.; Wang, R.; Xing, Y.; Lv, C.; Yu, F. Real-Time Evaluation of Hydrogen Peroxide Injuries in Pulmonary Fibrosis Mice Models with a Mitochondria-Targeted Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 1228–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Song, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, B.; Wang, L. A Facile, Nonreactive Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Detection Method Enabled by Ion Chromatography with UV Detector. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 11537–11544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Quimbar, M.E.; Davis, S.Q.; Al-Farra, S.T.; Hayes, A.; Jovic, V.; Masuda, M.; Lippert, A.R. Chemiluminescent Measurement of Hydrogen Peroxide in the Exhaled Breath Condensate of Healthy and Asthmatic Adults. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 14594–14600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xi, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, N.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, F.; Wang, S. Ultrafine Pd Nanoparticles Encapsulated in Microporous Co3O4 Hollow Nanospheres for In Situ Molecular Detection of Living Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5583–5590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lei, L.; Xie, W.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Y. Metal ion chelation-based color generation for alkaline phosphatase-linked high-performance visual immunoassays. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, H.; Chen, Q.; Cheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, G. Sustainable and scalable in-situ fabrication of Au nanoparticles and Fe3O4 hybrids as highly efficient electrocatalysts for the enzyme-free sensing of H2O2 in neutral and basic solutions. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 314, 128067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, M.; Jiang, X.; Liu, J.; Guo, H.; Liu, C. Highly sensitive H2O2 sensor based on Co3O4 hollow sphere prepared via a template-free method. Electrochimica Acta 2015, 182, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salazar, P.; Rico, V.J.; González-Elipe, A.R. Non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide detection at NiO nanoporous thin film-electrodes prepared by physical vapor deposition at oblique angles. Electrochimica Acta 2017, 235, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gowthaman, N.S.K.; Arul, P.; Lim, H.N.; John, S.A. Negative Potential-Induced Growth of Surfactant-Free CuO Nanostructures on an Al–C Substrate: A Dual In-Line Sensor for Biomarkers of Diabetes and Oxidative Stress. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 2640–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, X.; Yan, L.; Ren, H.; Cai, Y.; Liu, C.; Zeng, L.; Guo, J.; Liu, A. Facile synthesis of magnetic hierarchical flower-like Co3O4 spheres: Mechanism, excellent tetra-enzyme mimics and their colorimetric biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 165, 112342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Wu, D.; Li, X.; Hu, N.; Chen, J.; Chen, G.; Wu, Y. Recent progress in the design fabrication of metal-organic frameworks-based nanozymes and their applications to sensing and cancer therapy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 137, 178–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xiao, X.; Zou, L.; Pang, H.; Xu, Q. Synthesis of micro/nanoscaled metal–organic frameworks and their direct electrochemical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 301–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, C.; Kim, J.; Tang, J.; Kim, M.; Lim, H.; Malgras, V.; You, J.; Xu, Q.; Li, J.; Yamauchi, Y. New Strategies for Novel MOF-Derived Carbon Materials Based on Nanoarchitectures. Chem 2020, 6, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ejima, H.; Richardson, J.J.; Liang, K.; Best, J.P.; van Koeverden, M.P.; Such, G.K.; Cui, J.; Caruso, F. One-Step Assembly of Coordination Complexes for Versatile Film and Particle Engineering. Science 2013, 341, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liao, C.; Xu, Q.; Wu, C.; Fang, D.; Chen, S.; Chen, S.; Luo, J.; Li, L. Core–shell nano-structured carbon composites based on tannic acid for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 17215–17224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hu, M.; Ju, Y.; Liang, K.; Suma, T.; Cui, J.; Caruso, F. Void Engineering in Metal–Organic Frameworks via Synergistic Etching and Surface Functionalization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 5827–5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pan, L.; Wang, H.; Wu, C.; Liao, C.; Li, L. Tannic-Acid-Coated Polypropylene Membrane as a Separator for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 16003–16010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Z.; Guo, J.; Ma, J.; Shao, L. Highly regenerable alkali-resistant magnetic nanoparticles inspired by mussels for rapid selective dye removal offer high-efficiency environmental remediation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 19960–19968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Z.; Ji, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Q.; He, F.; Peng, S.; Li, Y. Tannic acid encountering ovalbumin: A green and mild strategy for superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic modification of various hydrophobic membranes for oil/water separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 13959–13967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zeng, T.; Zhang, X.; Guo, Y.; Niu, H.; Cai, Y. Enhanced catalytic application of Au@polyphenol-metal nanocomposites synthesized by a facile and green method. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 14807–14811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, J.; Cho, H.; Choi, J.; Kim, D.; Hong, D.; Park, J.H.; Yang, S.H.; Choi, I.S. Chemical sporulation and germination: Cytoprotective nanocoating of individual mammalian cells with a degradable tannic acid-FeIII complex. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 18918–18922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Li, J.; Wu, S.; Wu, C.; Qiu, L.; Zhu, G.; Cui, C.; Liu, Y.; Hou, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; et al. Versatile surface engineering of porous nanomaterials with bioinspired polyphenol coatings for targeted and controlled drug delivery. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 8600–8606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. García-Carmona, L.; Moreno-Guzmán, M.; Martín, A.; Martínez, S.B.; Fernandez-Martinez, A.-B.; González, M.C.; De Lucio-Cazaña, F.J.; Escarpa, A. Aligned copper nanowires as a cut-and-paste exclusive electrochemical transducer for free-enzyme highly selective quantification of intracellular hydrogen peroxide in cisplatin-treated cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 96, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, W.; Jiang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Carné-Sánchez, A.; Malgras, V.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.H.; Wang, S.; Liu, J.; Jiang, J.-S.; et al. Hollow carbon nanobubbles: Monocrystalline MOF nanobubbles and their pyrolysis. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 3538–3546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Huang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Lu, X.F.; Luan, D.; Lou, X.W. (David) Co3O4 Hollow Nanoparticles Embedded in Mesoporous Walls of Carbon Nanoboxes for Efficient Lithium Storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 19914–19918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, P.; Guan, B.Y.; Yu, L.; Lou, X.W. (David) Formation of Double-Shelled Zinc-Cobalt Sulfide Dodecahedral Cages from Bimetallic Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks for Hybrid Supercapacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7141–7145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Priyadharshini, T.; Saravanakumar, B.; Ravi, G.; Sakunthala, A.; Yuvakkumar, R. Hexamine Role on Pseudocapacitive Behaviour of Cobalt Oxide (Co3 O4 ) Nanopowders. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 4093–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, Y.; Yu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhang, B. In Situ Electrochemical Conversion of an Ultrathin Tannin Nickel Iron Complex Film as an Efficient Oxygen Evolution Reaction Electrocatalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 3769–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, X.; Na, Z.; Yin, D.; Wang, C.; Wu, Y.; Huang, G.; Wang, L. Phytic Acid-Assisted Formation of Hierarchical Porous CoP/C Nanoboxes for Enhanced Lithium Storage and Hydrogen Generation. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 12238–12246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Heli, H.; Pishahang, J. Cobalt oxide nanoparticles anchored to multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Synthesis and application for enhanced electrocatalytic reaction and highly sensitive nonenzymatic detection of hydrogen peroxide. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 123, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, K.; Wu, C.; Wang, F.; Liao, M.; Jiang, G. Bimetallic nanoparticles decorated hollow nanoporous carbon framework as nanozyme biosensor for highly sensitive electrochemical sensing of uric acid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 150, 111869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dai, H.; Chen, Y.; Niu, X.; Pan, C.; Chen, H.; Chen, X. High-performance electrochemical biosensor for nonenzymatic H2O2 sensing based on Au@C-Co3O4 heterostructures. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 118, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Qin, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, L.; Guo, S. MOF derived Co3O4/N-doped carbon nanotubes hybrids as efficient catalysts for sensitive detection of H2O2 and glucose. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 774–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. DAS, R.; Golder, A.K. Co3O4 spinel nanoparticles decorated graphite electrode: Bio-mediated synthesis and electrochemical H2O2 sensing. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 251, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustrations of the synthesis route of Co3O4@C and Co3O4@CNBs.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustrations of the synthesis route of Co3O4@C and Co3O4@CNBs.
Ijms 23 03799 sch001
Figure 1. (A) FESEM images of TA-Co NBs with different TA concentration (0 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL); (B) Corresponding TEM images.
Figure 1. (A) FESEM images of TA-Co NBs with different TA concentration (0 mg/mL, 0.5 mg/mL, 1 mg/mL, 2 mg/mL); (B) Corresponding TEM images.
Ijms 23 03799 g001
Figure 2. Co3O4@C: FESEM images of ZIF-67 after annealing at different temperature; Co3O4@CNBs: FESEM images of TA-Co after annealing at different temperature.
Figure 2. Co3O4@C: FESEM images of ZIF-67 after annealing at different temperature; Co3O4@CNBs: FESEM images of TA-Co after annealing at different temperature.
Ijms 23 03799 g002
Figure 3. (A) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at different temperature; and (B) pore-size distribution plot at different temperature.
Figure 3. (A) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at different temperature; and (B) pore-size distribution plot at different temperature.
Ijms 23 03799 g003
Figure 4. (A) TEM images of Co3O4@C; (B)HRTEM images of Co3O4@C; (C) HAADF-STEM images of Co3O4@C; (D) Elemental mapping images of C (green), Co (red), O (purple) and N (rose red) overlay of an individual Co3O4@C; (E) TEM images of Co3O4@CNBs; (F) HRTEM images of Co3O4@CNBs; (G) HAADF-STEM images of Co3O4@CNBs; (H) Elemental mapping images of C (green), Co (red), O (purple) and N (rose red) overlay of an individual Co3O4@CNBs.
Figure 4. (A) TEM images of Co3O4@C; (B)HRTEM images of Co3O4@C; (C) HAADF-STEM images of Co3O4@C; (D) Elemental mapping images of C (green), Co (red), O (purple) and N (rose red) overlay of an individual Co3O4@C; (E) TEM images of Co3O4@CNBs; (F) HRTEM images of Co3O4@CNBs; (G) HAADF-STEM images of Co3O4@CNBs; (H) Elemental mapping images of C (green), Co (red), O (purple) and N (rose red) overlay of an individual Co3O4@CNBs.
Ijms 23 03799 g004
Figure 5. (A) XRD of ZIF−67, TA−Co and Co3O4@CNBs; (B) FTIR spectra of ZIF-67, TA−Co and Co3O4@CNBs; (C) High-resolution XPS spectra of C 1 s and (D) High-resolution XPS spectra of Co 2p.
Figure 5. (A) XRD of ZIF−67, TA−Co and Co3O4@CNBs; (B) FTIR spectra of ZIF-67, TA−Co and Co3O4@CNBs; (C) High-resolution XPS spectra of C 1 s and (D) High-resolution XPS spectra of Co 2p.
Ijms 23 03799 g005
Figure 6. (A) CVs of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE and Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in the presence (purple line) and absence (blue line) of 2 mM H2O2 in 0.01 M PBS; (B) CVs of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in the absence and presence of different concentrations (from 0 to 6 mM) of H2O2 in 0.01 M PBS; (C) CVs of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in 0.01 M PBS at different scan rate (from 20 to 200 mV/s); (D) Linear relationship between the peak currents and the scan rates.
Figure 6. (A) CVs of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE and Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in the presence (purple line) and absence (blue line) of 2 mM H2O2 in 0.01 M PBS; (B) CVs of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in the absence and presence of different concentrations (from 0 to 6 mM) of H2O2 in 0.01 M PBS; (C) CVs of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in 0.01 M PBS at different scan rate (from 20 to 200 mV/s); (D) Linear relationship between the peak currents and the scan rates.
Ijms 23 03799 g006
Scheme 2. Schematic illustrations of the reaction mechanism of (A) Co3O4@C and (B) Co3O4@CNBs towards H2O2 sensing.
Scheme 2. Schematic illustrations of the reaction mechanism of (A) Co3O4@C and (B) Co3O4@CNBs towards H2O2 sensing.
Ijms 23 03799 sch002
Figure 7. (A) Amperometric response of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE for different concentrations of H2O2 in 0.01 M PBS at an applied potential of −0.22 V; (B) The corresponding linear relation between the amperometric response and H2O2 concentration; (C) Amperometric response of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE for H2O2 in the occurrence of other substances.
Figure 7. (A) Amperometric response of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE for different concentrations of H2O2 in 0.01 M PBS at an applied potential of −0.22 V; (B) The corresponding linear relation between the amperometric response and H2O2 concentration; (C) Amperometric response of Co3O4@CNBs/GCE for H2O2 in the occurrence of other substances.
Ijms 23 03799 g007
Figure 8. Amperometric response obtained at Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in the absence and presence upon addition of 2.5 μg/mL PMA and 20 μL 400 U·mL−1 catalase at −0.22 V. The insert is microscopy images of cells of (A) 4T1 cells; (B) A549 cells; (C) HUVEC cells.
Figure 8. Amperometric response obtained at Co3O4@CNBs/GCE in the absence and presence upon addition of 2.5 μg/mL PMA and 20 μL 400 U·mL−1 catalase at −0.22 V. The insert is microscopy images of cells of (A) 4T1 cells; (B) A549 cells; (C) HUVEC cells.
Ijms 23 03799 g008
Table 1. Comparison the sensing performance of Co3O4@CNBs reported with other H2O2 sensor in literatures.
Table 1. Comparison the sensing performance of Co3O4@CNBs reported with other H2O2 sensor in literatures.
Electrode MaterialsWorking Range/μMDetection Limit/nMReference
Pt@Co3O4 NPs10–300100[17]
Hollow Co3O40.4–2200105[20]
Au/Co@HNCF25–250023[44]
Au@C-Co3O4 NPs-19[45]
Co3O4/NCNTs5–11,0001[46]
Co3O4 NPs-21.7[47]
Co3O4@H-CNBs0.01–358.92.32This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S.; Chen, F.; Lei, L.; Yu, L.; Li, C. Co3O4 Nanoparticles Uniformly Dispersed in Rational Porous Carbon Nano-Boxes for Significantly Enhanced Electrocatalytic Detection of H2O2 Released from Living Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073799

AMA Style

Xiong L, Zhang Y, Wu S, Chen F, Lei L, Yu L, Li C. Co3O4 Nanoparticles Uniformly Dispersed in Rational Porous Carbon Nano-Boxes for Significantly Enhanced Electrocatalytic Detection of H2O2 Released from Living Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(7):3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiong, Lulu, Yuanyuan Zhang, Shiming Wu, Feng Chen, Lingli Lei, Ling Yu, and Changming Li. 2022. "Co3O4 Nanoparticles Uniformly Dispersed in Rational Porous Carbon Nano-Boxes for Significantly Enhanced Electrocatalytic Detection of H2O2 Released from Living Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 7: 3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073799

APA Style

Xiong, L., Zhang, Y., Wu, S., Chen, F., Lei, L., Yu, L., & Li, C. (2022). Co3O4 Nanoparticles Uniformly Dispersed in Rational Porous Carbon Nano-Boxes for Significantly Enhanced Electrocatalytic Detection of H2O2 Released from Living Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(7), 3799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop