Skip to Content
IJMSInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

23 May 2023

Strategies for Reducing Toxicity and Enhancing Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies

,
,
,
,
and
1
Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
2
Department of Pain Treatment, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
3
Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematologic malignancies has made great progress, but there are still some problems. First, T cells from tumor patients show an exhaustion phenotype; thus, the persistence and function of the CAR-Ts are poor, and achieving a satisfactory curative effect is difficult. Second, some patients initially respond well but quickly develop antigen-negative tumor recurrence. Thirdly, CAR-T treatment is not effective in some patients and is accompanied by severe side effects, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. The solution to these problems is to reduce the toxicity and enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy. In this paper, we describe various strategies for reducing the toxicity and enhancing the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in hematological malignancies. In the first section, strategies for modifying CAR-Ts using gene-editing technologies or combining them with other anti-tumor drugs to enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy are introduced. The second section describes some methods in which the design and construction of CAR-Ts differ from the conventional process. The aim of these methods is to enhance the anti-tumor activity of CAR-Ts and prevent tumor recurrence. The third section describes modifying the CAR structure or installing safety switches to radically reduce CAR-T toxicity or regulating inflammatory cytokines to control the symptoms of CAR-T-associated toxicity. Together, the knowledge summarized herein will aid in designing better-suited and safer CAR-T treatment strategies.

1. Introduction

Cellular adoptive immunotherapy is a treatment in which immunoreactive cells that have been activated and amplified in vitro are injected into patients. Nonspecific cellular adoptive therapies include lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAKs) and cytokine-induced killers (CIKs). Specific cellular adoptive therapies include tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TCR-T therapy, and CAR-T therapy. CAR-T therapy has a significant advantage in hematological malignancies and has been widely studied. However, CAR-T therapy also has certain problems that remain to be solved, such as poor efficacy and persistence in some patients, obvious CAR-T-associated toxicity, tumor recurrence, and other problems [1,2]. To reduce its toxicity and enhance its efficacy, researchers are using gene-editing technologies or anti-tumor drugs to explore new strategies throughout the process of designing, manufacturing, and using CAR-Ts.
For example, T cells were gene-edited to knock out the NO4A and TOX genes and overexpress argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) before CAR lentivirus transfection, thus improving CAR-T function [3,4,5]. Strategies such as the inhibition of the PI3K signaling pathway and the BET protein in T cells [6,7] induce a better functional status and differentiation phenotype of T cells. When designing CAR structures, tandem CARs, dual CARs, and tri-specific CARs are constructed, which enable CAR-Ts to respond to multiple antigens, enhance their efficacy, and prevent antigen-negative tumor recurrence [8,9,10]. Researchers installed a “safety switch” in the CAR structure which enabled medical personnel to control the activity of CAR-Ts or completely eliminate CAR-Ts when serious toxicity occurred [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. There were also studies that used other anti-tumor drugs, such as BTK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, which can enhance the efficacy and activity of CAR-Ts. [18,19,20]. In addition, anti-inflammatory cytokine drugs such as the IL-6R monoclonal antibody tocilizumab, IL-1R monoclonal antibody anakinra, and a GM-CSF antibody were used to reduce the toxicity of CAR-T therapy [21,22,23]. These strategies have shown satisfactory effects in enhancing the efficacy and reducing the toxicity of CAR-T therapy. Understanding them will aid medical personnel in better using CAR-T therapies to cure hematological malignancies. The strategies for using the gene-editing technologies involved in this paper are described in Table 1. The strategies for using the drugs involved in this paper are described in Table 2.
Table 1. Strategies to enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy and reduce its toxicity using gene-editing technologies.
Table 2. Strategies to enhance the efficacy of CAR-T therapy and reduce toxicity using drugs.

2. Combining CAR-T Therapy with Gene Editing or Drug Assistance to Enhance CAR-T Persistence and Anti-Tumor Efficacy

In the field of gene editing, zinc finger nucleases, TALEN, and CRISPR-cas9 have been used to edit the genes of cells. Researchers hope to use these strategies to enhance the activity of CAR-Ts or to re-engineer CAR-Ts into universal CAR-Ts, known as off-the-shelf CAR-Ts, to reduce the risk of host versus graft disease [102,103]. Zinc finger nucleases (ZFN) consists of a zinc finger protein (ZFP) and a Fok I endonuclease, which can recognize and spot-cut DNA to achieve gene-editing purposes. Researchers usually use plasmid transfection to produce a zinc finger nuclease in the cell for this function [104]. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are also used to deliver zinc finger nuclease mRNA into cells for gene editing [105]. TALEN is composed of a transcription-activator-like (TAL) effector and nuclease, which recognize and bind specific DNA sequences. It has the same gene-editing effect as ZFN. Electroporation is commonly used to deliver TALEN mRNA into cells. In the field of CAR-T therapy, the presence of TCR on the surfaces of CAR-Ts can lead to host versus graft disease, which makes constructed CAR-Ts available only to the donor. The TALEN technique was used to knock out the TCR of CAR-Ts and successfully construct a universal CAR-T, reducing the risk of host anti-graft disease [106]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system consists of two parts: the Cas9 protein, which performs DNA cutting, and the sgRNA, which has a guiding function. The RNP method, viral transfection, plasmid transfection, and the transposon method were used to transfer gRNA and Cas9 proteins into cells to complete gene editing. In the field of CAR-T therapy, researchers have demonstrated that this system can effectively perform gene editing on T cells and CAR-Ts [107,108]. Recently, researchers have developed a new gene-editing technique called CRISPR-based library-scale AAV perturbation with simultaneous HDR knock-in (CLASH), which can achieve unitary and rapid transgene knock-in [109].

2.1. Pretreating CAR-Ts to Enhance Their Activity

Orphan nuclear receptor NR4A protein is associated with the exhaustion of CD8+ T cells [24]. In terms of the mechanism, NR4A can promote the acetylation of histone 3 at lysine 27 (H3K27ac), leading to the activation of immunotoleration-related genes. NR4A can also inhibit AP-1, thus inhibiting the expression of T cells’ effector genes. CD8+ T cells from tumor patients express high levels of NR4A transcription factors, thus limiting the function of CAR-Ts. NR4A-knockout CAR-Ts enhanced anti-tumor function, promoted tumor reduction in vitro [4,25].
Another gene that can be targeted to enhance CAR-T efficacy is TOX. The DNA-binding protein TOX can cause T cell exhaustion. TOX knockout enhances CAR-Ts’ persistence and tumor-killing activity [26,27]. This may be due to the reduced expression of T cells’ surface inhibitory receptors, such as Pdcd1, Entpd1, Havcr2, Cd244, and Tigit, via Tox knockout [5]. In addition, Regnase-1-deficient CD8+ T cells expressed higher levels of memory-T-cell-associated genes and lower levels of TOX expression. These cells significantly increased anti-leukemia activity and persistence in a mouse model [28].
In addition to gene editing, using drugs to affect the functions of proteins can also have an effect. PI3K inhibitors can regulate the differentiation of CAR-Ts to maintain a lower differentiation phenotype, improve in vivo persistence, and reduce the tumor burden in mice models [7]. Dual PI3Kδ/γ inhibition during CAR-Ts’ expansion procedure maximized the number of central memory T stem cells and naive T cells and decreased the expression of the TIM-3 exhaustion marker. CAR-Ts treated with duvelisib increased the expression of mitochondrial fusion protein MFN2, thus increasing the relative mitochondrial content. These CAR-Ts showed a significant increase in cytotoxicity against CD8+ chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) target cells in vitro. In a mouse model, these CAR-Ts expanded significantly faster, persisted longer, and eliminated tumors more quickly [59].
Another protein that can be targeted is BET. Bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) protein BRD4 directly regulate the expression of transcription factor BATF in CD8+ T cells, which can promote the differentiation of CD8+ T cells into effector T cells. JQ1, an inhibitor BET protein, enables CD8+ T cells to exhibit stem-like or central memory T cell characteristics by inhibiting the expression of the transcription factor BATF. JQ1-treated CAR-Ts showed enhanced persistence and anti-tumor effects in vitro. In addition, researchers found that histone acetyltransferase p300 can also promote BATF transcription, and the inhibition of p300 enhanced the anti-tumor effect of adoptive transferred T cells. These results suggest that targeting BATF signals can generate superior CAR-Ts for clinical purposes [6].
In addition to transcriptional factors, proteins that exert enzymatic activity can also affect cell activity. Tumor cells consume large amounts of arginine to drive cell proliferation, and the resulting low-arginine microenvironment impairs the proliferation of CAR-Ts. In addition, the expression of argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) and ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC), which are involved in arginine synthesis, was low in T cells. Gene editing T cells to express functional ASS or OTC enzymes can promote the proliferation of CAR-Ts without increasing the T cells’ exhaustion. These modified CAR-Ts effectively mediated tumor clearance in vivo [3].

2.2. Combining CAR-Ts with Other Anti-Tumor Strategies

In addition to cell therapy, immunotherapy includes immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-cytokine antibodies, and chemotherapy drugs. Here, we will explore how these drugs can be combined with CAR-T therapy to enhance its efficacy.
Ibrutinib enhances the activity of CAR-Ts and promotes their expansion by down-regulating the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) on the T cells‘ surfaces. It also down-regulates CD200, an immunosuppressive molecule, on tumor cells. In lymphocytic leukemia xenotransplantation models, ibrutinib improved CAR-T implantation and tumor clearance [18,60,61]. The addition of ibrutinib when manufacturing CAR-Ts increased the activity and expansion capacity of the CAR-Ts. The resulting CAR-Ts enriched the phenotypes of less-differentiated naive cells and decreased the expression of exhaustion markers such as PD-1/TIM-3/LAG-3 [62]. Ibrutinib also reduces serum cytokine levels during CAR-T therapy and prevents the occurrence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) [63].
BCL-2 inhibitors can inhibit the binding of BCL-2 and BAX proteins to form a dimer so that the tumor cells can re-establish their normal apoptosis capacity. It has now been shown that the pre-sensitization of B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) tumor cells with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax can up-regulate the expression of CD19 and pro-apoptotic proteins on tumor cells. The subsequent use of CAR-T therapy can achieve a satisfactory killing effect and maintain CAR-Ts [64].
Tumor cells’ expression of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) can convert tryptophan into metabolites that inhibit central immune function [65]. In the field of CAR-T therapy, tryptophan metabolites inhibit cytokine-dependent amplification, cytotoxicity, and cytokine secretion with CAR-Ts. CD19 CAR-Ts could not function on IDO-positive tumors. IDO inhibitors (1-methyltryptophan) improved the anti-tumor efficacy of CD19 CAR-Ts in lymphoma. In addition, fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, which were routinely used before CAR-T therapy, down-regulated IDO expression in lymphoma cells and improved the anti-tumor activity of CD19-CAR-T in vivo [66].
Exhausted T cells are present in tumor patients and are described as a subpopulation of T cells with significant losses of proliferative potential and effector function. These exhausted T cells also consistently overexpress multiple immune checkpoint receptors such as PD-1/TIM-3/LAG-3/CTLA-4 [67,68]. Studies have shown that the activity of CAR-Ts constructed from these exhausted T cells is significantly limited, ultimately affecting the efficacy and outcome of CAR-T therapy. That is, exhausted T cells are associated with poor molecular responses [69,70]. In a clinical trial of CD19 CAR-Ts, the no response (NR) group showed a higher frequency of exhausted T cells. High frequencies of TIM3+ and LAG3+ T cells upon cell collection predicted the failure of CAR-T therapy [71]. Worse, in AML/CML/ALL, PD-L1 was abnormally expressed on tumor cells, which combined with PD-1 on the surface of the exhausted T cells to further impair CAR-T activity [19,72,73].
In preclinical trials, blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interactions through the use of PD-L1 antibodies in a mouse model restored the function of T cells function and prolonged mouse survival [19]. Using gene-editing technology to knock out the PD-1 gene in T cells can also achieve a similar effect. [74,75,76]. In CLL, the use of antibodies to block LAG-3 improved the activation of T cells [20]. Additionally, blocking CTLA-4 in combination with CAR-T therapy has also been shown to be beneficial [77].
In clinical trials, the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab was effective and safe for CD19 CAR-T therapy in patients with relapsed B-ALL, enhancing the effects and persistence of the CAR-T [72]. In a clinical trial of 11 non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, CD19 CAR-T combined with nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) mediated severe anti-lymphoma activity. The objective response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were 81.81% (9/11) and 45.45% (5/11), respectively. In addition to the powerful curative effect, all the side effects were controllable and reversible. Overall, the combination of immunocheckpoint inhibitors and CAR-T therapy showed good efficacy and safety [78].

3. Enhancing the Anti-Tumor Efficacy of CAR-Ts and Preventing Tumor Recurrence in the Process of Their Design, Manufacture, and Usage

3.1. Adjusting the Design of CAR Structure

Conventional CAR structures recognize single-tumor-specific antigens, such as CD19 and CD20, and mediate T cell effects. However, not all tumor cells express what we identify as tumor-specific antigens. For example, the presence of CD19-negative tumor cells in B-ALL patients before anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy leads to antigen-negative tumor recurrence [110]. In addition, the survival stress induced by CAR-T therapy also induces acquired mutations in B-ALL tumor cells, resulting in tumor cells with a CD19-negative phenotype. These CD19-negative tumor cells can escape the killing of CD19 CAR-Ts [111]. Researchers have constructed novel CAR structures that can simultaneously recognize two or more antigens, thus solving this problem.
Researchers have constructed tandem CAR structures with bispecific properties. The antigen-binding domain of this CAR structure has two tandem scFvs that recognize both CD19 and CD20. This tandem CAR-T structure is shown in Figure 1. Researchers demonstrated that such a bispecific antigen recognition domain does not affect the growth, differentiation, and lytic ability of CAR-Ts. Such tandem CAR-Ts can identify CD20 in the absence of CD19 molecules in tumor cells, thus solving the problem of antigen-negative tumor recurrence [9,49]. In preclinical trials, CD19/CD22 tandem CAR-T produced interferon-γ(IFN-γ) and interleukin-12 (IL-12) equivalent to monospecific CAR-Ts and eradicated tumor-cell-line xenografts and patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX) [50]. In addition, both CD19/CD79b and CD19/CD37 tandem CAR-T treatments showed efficacy in preclinical trials [51,52]. In clinical trials, CD19/CD22 tandem CAR-Ts demonstrated safety and significant anti-leukemia activity in refractory/relapsed B-ALL patients [53,54]. CD19/CD20 tandem CAR-T treatment elicits an effective and durable anti-tumor response in refractory/relapsed NHL patients, with a complete response rate (CRR) of 71% and a progression-free survival rate at 12 months of 64% [55]. In addition to avoiding antigen-negative tumor recurrence, tandem CAR-Ts were less toxic with a higher disease burden, possibly due to their optimized tumor-killing activity and moderate cytokine production [56].
Figure 1. T cells obtained from patients were modified to construct various CAR-Ts. In tandem CAR-T, T cells express a CAR structure with two antigen-binding domains. In dual CAR-T, T cells expressed two CAR structures with an antigen-binding domain on each CAR structure. In tri-specific CAR-T, T cells express three CAR structures, each of which has an antigen-binding domain. In another tri-specific CAR-T, T cells express two CAR structures, a tandem CAR structure and another conventional, single-tumor-specific CAR structure. In armored CAR-T, the T cells secrete cytokines that promote the immune response, enhancing the anti-tumor effect.
In addition to tandem CAR-T, the simultaneous expression of two CAR structures on dual CAR-Ts had the same effect. This dual CAR-T structure is shown in Figure 1. The researchers found that CD123 was up-regulated in leukemia-initiating cells and CD19-negative blast cells in B-CLL. They therefore used two lentiviruses to construct dual CAR-Ts expressing both CD19 CAR and CD123 CAR structures. In in vivo and in vitro studies, these dual CAR-Ts demonstrated enhanced anti-tumor activity when compared to monospecific CAR-Ts and certainly overcame the problem of CD19-negative recurrence in B-ALL [8]. In clinical trials, dual CAR-Ts expressing both CD19 CAR and CD22 CAR demonstrated safety and efficacy in pediatric/young adult B-ALL patients [57].
There are even CAR-Ts that express three antigen-specific CAR structures at the same T cell, which are called tri-specific CAR-Ts. These CD19/20/22 tri-specific CAR-Ts were effective at killing tumor cells in vitro and in vivo and were effective at preventing antigen-negative tumor recurrence. Tumor cells expressing any of these three antigens will be recognized and killed by the tri-specific CAR-Ts [58]. This CAR-T structure is shown in Figure 1. There is another tri-specific CAR-T that combines tandem-CAR and dual-CAR features to express a conventional CD22 CAR and a tandem CD19/CD20 CAR. These tri-specific CAR-Ts showed enhanced cytolytic activity in vitro and were effective against CD19-negative target cells. In animal models, when monospecific CAR-T is not effective, this tri-specific CAR-T can still effectively kill tumors. [10]. This tri-specific CAR-T structure is shown in Figure 1.
In addition to modifying CAR structures to achieve better tumor-killing efficacy, gene editing CAR-Ts to secrete cytokines that promote the immune response is also a strategy. This CAR-T is called the fourth generation CAR-T or armored-CART. IL-12 can stimulate T cells to produce interferon-γ (IFN-γ), induce the apoptosis of Treg, and increase the infiltration of CD8+ T cells to enhance the immune response [112,113]. In addition, IL-12 can also increase the expression of CD80, CD86, OX-40L, and other co-stimulatory molecules on the surface of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), weaken the T-cell-inhibiting function of MDSCs, and enhance the anti-tumor immune response [114]. CAR-Ts engineered to express IL-12 showed enhanced lethal activity in lymphoma models. These IL-12-secreting CAR-Ts not only kill tumor cells better but also recruit immune cells to perform an anti-tumor immune response [115]. IL-18-secreting CAR-Ts showed enhanced in vivo expansion and persistence and significantly improved long-term survival in hematologic tumor mouse models. In addition, the IL-18 secreted by CAR-Ts modulates the tumor microenvironment and induces the amplification of immunoeffector cells such as natural killer cells, NKT cells, dendritic cells (DC), and CD8+ T cells, thereby enhancing the endogenous anti-tumor immune response [116]. Compared with conventional CD19 CAR-Ts, IL-15-secreting CD19 CAR-Ts showed greater amplification, lower cell mortality, decreased expression of PD-1, and an enhanced anti-tumor effect in vivo [117]. This CAR-T structure is shown in Figure 1.

3.2. Optimizing the Manufacturing Process of CAR-Ts

The exhaustion and senescence of T cells affect their activity and function. T cells in patients with hematological malignancies exhibit an exhaustion phenotype, and CAR-Ts constructed from autologous T cells of these patients also exhibit an exhaustion phenotype [118]. CD4+T cells in CLL patients expressed high levels of exhaustion markers such as PD-1, CD160, and CD244. CD8+ T cells showed a decrease in their proliferative capacity and cell activity [119]. T cells from CLL patients had a lower proportion of naive T cells than T cells from normal subjects, and CAR-Ts constructed from such T cells also had a poor expansion potential and poor long-term maintenance capacity [120,121]. Some studies have reprogrammed antigen-specific CD8+ T cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (IPSCs) and induced them to re-differentiate. These re-differentiated T cells have a high proliferative capacity and long telomeres and have an enhanced antigen-specific killing activity [122,123]. This method fundamentally reverses the exhaustion status of the T cells and restores their activity. CAR T cells constructed using such “enhanced” T cells should exhibit greater cell activities and a lower percentage proportion of exhausted cells.
The lentivirus infection temperature appears to influence the phenotype and function of the resulting CAR-Ts. The results showed that CAR-Ts produced via the lentivirus transfection of T cells at 32 degrees had the largest proportion of naive cells, the lowest immune checkpoint receptor expression, and the strongest tumor-cell-killing activity. These CAR-T seems to strike a balance between function and phenotype for optimal clinical outcomes [124].
IL-2 is routinely used in the process of T cell expansion in vitro, but high concentrations of IL-2 drive T cells to differentiate into effector cells and reduce the number of central memory T cells. Studies have shown that reducing the use of IL-2 and shortening the time of T cell amplification in vitro can increase the number of early memory T cells. The resulting CAR-Ts also showed better performance [125].
Studies have shown that lymphocyte depletion therapy prior to CAR-T infusion helps CAR-Ts function. One reason for this is that lymphocyte depletion therapy increases the levels of IL-7 and IL-15, which enhance the function and anti-tumor activity of T cells function [126]. Preclinical studies have shown that the addition of IL-7 and IL-15 in the process of the expansion of T cells can increase the number and proportion of CD8+CD45RA+CCR7+-naive T cells that are resistant to T-cell death induced by multiple exposures to antigens and thus exert a more powerful anti-tumor effect [127]. Other studies have shown that IL-15 enhances the anti-tumor activity of CAR-Ts and promotes the expansion of stem-cell-like memory subsets [128]. In addition, IL-15-treated CAR-Ts showed decreased expression of exhaustion markers, enhanced anti-apoptotic ability, increased proliferation ability, and improved mitochondrial activity [129]. rIL-21 can improve the activity and proliferation of T cells in aged mice and promote the development of new T cells [130,131]. The addition of IL-21 improved the function of CAR-Ts. Animal studies have shown that CAR-Ts cultured with IL-21 can effectively penetrate CD19+B cell tumor foci in mice [132].

3.3. Combining Multiple CAR-Ts to Increase Efficiency

Single-target CAR-T therapy sometimes fails to achieve a satisfactory response and is associated with antigen-negative tumor recurrence. The introduction of multiple CAR-Ts targeting several targets may solve this problem. There are three CD19-CART-resistant DLBCL patients who achieved complete responses (CRs) after treatment with CD22 CAR-Ts [133]. Another study evaluated sequential administration of CD19 and CD22 CAR-Ts in R/R B-ALL and NHL patients and concluded that this approach is safe and effective in mediating long-term remission in patients [134,135,136]. In addition, the sequential or simultaneous infusion of CD19/BCMA CAR-T and CD20/CD22 CAR-T was also studied [137,138,139]. There are even studies of the sequential infusion of three CAR-Ts. Researchers explored relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma with the sequential infusion of CD19/CD22/CD20 CAR-Ts. Results show that this approach can induce lasting remissions in patients, and only a small number of patients develop severe CRS and neurotoxicity. This proves the safety and feasibility of this cocktail therapy [140,141].

5. Conclusions

CAR-T therapy in hematologic malignancies has made great progress, but there are still some areas for improvement. For example, life-threatening toxicity, insufficient anti-tumor activity, poor persistence, and the recurrence of tumors occurred in the course of CAR-T therapy. In this paper, we describe various strategies for reducing the toxicity and enhancing the efficacy of CAR-T therapy. For example, T cells can be modified to knock out or overexpress certain genes or inhibit certain effector proteins, thus enhancing the T cells’ activity. Anti-tumor strategies such as BTK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors were combined to enhance the effects of CAR-Ts. Hinge domains, transmembrane domains, antigen-binding domains, and co-stimulatory domains were adjusted to enhance anti-tumor activity and reduce toxicity during CAR design. Using drugs to control inflammatory cytokines in the presence of life-threatening toxicity to control symptoms directly or controlling CAR-Ts activity with drugs are other possibilities. In the case of life-threatening circumstances during CAR-T therapy, we can even target the elimination of CAR-Ts and terminate CAR-T therapy. In conclusion, to make CAR-T therapy safer and more effective, researchers have developed several strategies. These strategies will contribute to the better application of CAR-T therapy for hematologic malignancies.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, H.W., L.T., Y.K. and W.L.; writing—review and editing, X.Z. and Y.Y.; visualization, H.W., L.T., Y.K. and W.L.; supervision, X.Z. and Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

ASSargininosuccinate synthetase
ALLacute lymphoblastic leukemia
ANPatrial natriuretic peptide
BETzbromodomain and extra-terminal motif
CAR-Tchimeric antigen receptor T cells
CILCytokine-induced killer
CLLchronic lymphocytic leukemia
CRcomplete response
CRScytokine release syndrome
GVHDgraft versus host disease
IDOindoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase
IFN-γinterferon-γ
LAKlymphokine-activated killer cell
MDSCmyeloid-derived suppressor cells
MTPmethyltyrosine
NHLnon-Hodgkin lymphoma
NRno response
ORRobjective response rate
OTCornithine transcarbamylase
PD-1programmed cell death protein 1
scFvsingle-chain antibody fragment
TILtumor infiltrating lymphocyte

References

  1. Sterner, R.C.; Sterner, R.M. CAR-T cell therapy: Current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2021, 11, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kong, Y.; Tang, L.; You, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhu, X. Analysis of causes for poor persistence of CAR-T cell therapy in vivo. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1063454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fultang, L.; Booth, S.; Yogev, O.; Martins da Costa, B.; Tubb, V.; Panetti, S.; Stavrou, V.; Scarpa, U.; Jankevics, A.; Lloyd, G.; et al. Metabolic engineering against the arginine microenvironment enhances CAR-T cell proliferation and therapeutic activity. Blood 2020, 136, 1155–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, J.; López-Moyado, I.F.; Seo, H.; Lio, C.J.; Hempleman, L.J.; Sekiya, T.; Yoshimura, A.; Scott-Browne, J.P.; Rao, A. NR4A transcription factors limit CAR T cell function in solid tumours. Nature 2019, 567, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scott, A.C.; Dündar, F.; Zumbo, P.; Chandran, S.S.; Klebanoff, C.A.; Shakiba, M.; Trivedi, P.; Menocal, L.; Appleby, H.; Camara, S.; et al. TOX is a critical regulator of tumour-specific T cell differentiation. Nature 2019, 571, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kagoya, Y.; Nakatsugawa, M.; Yamashita, Y.; Ochi, T.; Guo, T.; Anczurowski, M.; Saso, K.; Butler, M.O.; Arrowsmith, C.H.; Hirano, N. BET bromodomain inhibition enhances T cell persistence and function in adoptive immunotherapy models. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3479–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zheng, W.; O’Hear, C.E.; Alli, R.; Basham, J.H.; Abdelsamed, H.A.; Palmer, L.E.; Jones, L.L.; Youngblood, B.; Geiger, T.L. PI3K orchestration of the in vivo persistence of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. Leukemia 2018, 32, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ruella, M.; Barrett, D.M.; Kenderian, S.S.; Shestova, O.; Hofmann, T.J.; Perazzelli, J.; Klichinsky, M.; Aikawa, V.; Nazimuddin, F.; Kozlowski, M.; et al. Dual CD19 and CD123 targeting prevents antigen-loss relapses after CD19-directed immunotherapies. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 3814–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grada, Z.; Hegde, M.; Byrd, T.; Shaffer, D.R.; Ghazi, A.; Brawley, V.S.; Corder, A.; Schönfeld, K.; Koch, J.; Dotti, G.; et al. TanCAR: A Novel Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor for Cancer Immunotherapy. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2013, 2, e105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schneider, D.; Xiong, Y.; Wu, D.; Hu, P.; Alabanza, L.; Steimle, B.; Mahmud, H.; Anthony-Gonda, K.; Krueger, W.; Zhu, Z.; et al. Trispecific CD19-CD20-CD22-targeting duoCAR-T cells eliminate antigen-heterogeneous B cell tumors in preclinical models. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabc6401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, J.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Kazane, S.A.; Choi, S.H.; Yun, H.Y.; Kim, M.S.; Rodgers, D.T.; Pugh, H.M.; Singer, O.; Sun, S.B.; et al. Versatile strategy for controlling the specificity and activity of engineered T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E450–E458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weber, E.W.; Lynn, R.C.; Sotillo, E.; Lattin, J.; Xu, P.; Mackall, C.L. Pharmacologic control of CAR-T cell function using dasatinib. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Paszkiewicz, P.J.; Fräßle, S.P.; Srivastava, S.; Sommermeyer, D.; Hudecek, M.; Drexler, I.; Sadelain, M.; Liu, L.; Jensen, M.C.; Riddell, S.R.; et al. Targeted antibody-mediated depletion of murine CD19 CAR T cells permanently reverses B cell aplasia. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 4262–4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ciceri, F.; Bonini, C.; Marktel, S.; Zappone, E.; Servida, P.; Bernardi, M.; Pescarollo, A.; Bondanza, A.; Peccatori, J.; Rossini, S.; et al. Antitumor effects of HSV-TK-engineered donor lymphocytes after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. Blood 2007, 109, 4698–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Straathof, K.C.; Pulè, M.A.; Yotnda, P.; Dotti, G.; Vanin, E.F.; Brenner, M.K.; Heslop, H.E.; Spencer, D.M.; Rooney, C.M. An inducible caspase 9 safety switch for T-cell therapy. Blood 2005, 105, 4247–4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Griffioen, M.; van Egmond, E.H.; Kester, M.G.; Willemze, R.; Falkenburg, J.H.; Heemskerk, M.H. Retroviral transfer of human CD20 as a suicide gene for adoptive T-cell therapy. Haematologica 2009, 94, 1316–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Juillerat, A.; Tkach, D.; Busser, B.W.; Temburni, S.; Valton, J.; Duclert, A.; Poirot, L.; Depil, S.; Duchateau, P. Modulation of chimeric antigen receptor surface expression by a small molecule switch. BMC Biotechnol. 2019, 19, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fraietta, J.A.; Beckwith, K.A.; Patel, P.R.; Ruella, M.; Zheng, Z.; Barrett, D.M.; Lacey, S.F.; Melenhorst, J.J.; McGettigan, S.E.; Cook, D.R.; et al. Ibrutinib enhances chimeric antigen receptor T-cell engraftment and efficacy in leukemia. Blood 2016, 127, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mumprecht, S.; Schürch, C.; Schwaller, J.; Solenthaler, M.; Ochsenbein, A.F. Programmed death 1 signaling on chronic myeloid leukemia-specific T cells results in T-cell exhaustion and disease progression. Blood 2009, 114, 1528–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shapiro, M.; Herishanu, Y.; Katz, B.Z.; Dezorella, N.; Sun, C.; Kay, S.; Polliack, A.; Avivi, I.; Wiestner, A.; Perry, C. Lymphocyte activation gene 3: A novel therapeutic target in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica 2017, 102, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Le, R.Q.; Li, L.; Yuan, W.; Shord, S.S.; Nie, L.; Habtemariam, B.A.; Przepiorka, D.; Farrell, A.T.; Pazdur, R. FDA Approval Summary: Tocilizumab for Treatment of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Induced Severe or Life-Threatening Cytokine Release Syndrome. Oncologist 2018, 23, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giavridis, T.; van der Stegen, S.J.C.; Eyquem, J.; Hamieh, M.; Piersigilli, A.; Sadelain, M. CAR T cell-induced cytokine release syndrome is mediated by macrophages and abated by IL-1 blockade. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sterner, R.M.; Sakemura, R.; Cox, M.J.; Yang, N.; Khadka, R.H.; Forsman, C.L.; Hansen, M.J.; Jin, F.; Ayasoufi, K.; Hefazi, M.; et al. GM-CSF inhibition reduces cytokine release syndrome and neuroinflammation but enhances CAR-T cell function in xenografts. Blood 2019, 133, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mognol, G.P.; Spreafico, R.; Wong, V.; Scott-Browne, J.P.; Togher, S.; Hoffmann, A.; Hogan, P.G.; Rao, A.; Trifari, S. Exhaustion-associated regulatory regions in CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E2776–E2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Lu, H.; Li, J.; Yan, X.; Xiao, M.; Hao, J.; Alekseev, A.; Khong, H.; Chen, T.; et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies NR4A1 as a key mediator of T cell dysfunction. Nature 2019, 567, 525–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Seo, H.; Chen, J.; González-Avalos, E.; Samaniego-Castruita, D.; Das, A.; Wang, Y.H.; López-Moyado, I.F.; Georges, R.O.; Zhang, W.; Onodera, A.; et al. TOX and TOX2 transcription factors cooperate with NR4A transcription factors to impose CD8(+) T cell exhaustion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 12410–12415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khan, O.; Giles, J.R.; McDonald, S.; Manne, S.; Ngiow, S.F.; Patel, K.P.; Werner, M.T.; Huang, A.C.; Alexander, K.A.; Wu, J.E.; et al. TOX transcriptionally and epigenetically programs CD8(+) T cell exhaustion. Nature 2019, 571, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wei, J.; Long, L.; Zheng, W.; Dhungana, Y.; Lim, S.A.; Guy, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.D.; Qian, C.; Xu, B.; et al. Targeting REGNASE-1 programs long-lived effector T cells for cancer therapy. Nature 2019, 576, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Chang, W.C.; Wong, C.W.; Colcher, D.; Sherman, M.; Ostberg, J.R.; Forman, S.J.; Riddell, S.R.; Jensen, M.C. A transgene-encoded cell surface polypeptide for selection, in vivo tracking, and ablation of engineered cells. Blood 2011, 118, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Philip, B.; Kokalaki, E.; Mekkaoui, L.; Thomas, S.; Straathof, K.; Flutter, B.; Marin, V.; Marafioti, T.; Chakraverty, R.; Linch, D.; et al. A highly compact epitope-based marker/suicide gene for easier and safer T-cell therapy. Blood 2014, 124, 1277–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vogler, I.; Newrzela, S.; Hartmann, S.; Schneider, N.; von Laer, D.; Koehl, U.; Grez, M. An improved bicistronic CD20/tCD34 vector for efficient purification and in vivo depletion of gene-modified T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Mol. Ther. 2010, 18, 1330–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sommer, C.; Boldajipour, B.; Kuo, T.C.; Bentley, T.; Sutton, J.; Chen, A.; Geng, T.; Dong, H.; Galetto, R.; Valton, J.; et al. Preclinical Evaluation of Allogeneic CAR T Cells Targeting BCMA for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. Mol. Ther. 2019, 27, 1126–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guercio, M.; Manni, S.; Boffa, I.; Caruso, S.; Di Cecca, S.; Sinibaldi, M.; Abbaszadeh, Z.; Camera, A.; Ciccone, R.; Polito, V.A.; et al. Inclusion of the Inducible Caspase 9 Suicide Gene in CAR Construct Increases Safety of CAR.CD19 T Cell Therapy in B-Cell Malignancies. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 755639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Di Stasi, A.; Tey, S.K.; Dotti, G.; Fujita, Y.; Kennedy-Nasser, A.; Martinez, C.; Straathof, K.; Liu, E.; Durett, A.G.; Grilley, B.; et al. Inducible apoptosis as a safety switch for adoptive cell therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1673–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Diaconu, I.; Ballard, B.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Y.; West, J.; Dotti, G.; Savoldo, B. Inducible Caspase-9 Selectively Modulates the Toxicities of CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Budde, L.E.; Berger, C.; Lin, Y.; Wang, J.; Lin, X.; Frayo, S.E.; Brouns, S.A.; Spencer, D.M.; Till, B.G.; Jensen, M.C.; et al. Combining a CD20 chimeric antigen receptor and an inducible caspase 9 suicide switch to improve the efficacy and safety of T cell adoptive immunotherapy for lymphoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Minagawa, K.; Jamil, M.O.; Al-Obaidi, M.; Pereboeva, L.; Salzman, D.; Erba, H.P.; Lamb, L.S.; Bhatia, R.; Mineishi, S.; Di Stasi, A. In Vitro Pre-Clinical Validation of Suicide Gene Modified Anti-CD33 Redirected Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Amatya, C.; Pegues, M.A.; Lam, N.; Vanasse, D.; Geldres, C.; Choi, S.; Hewitt, S.M.; Feldman, S.A.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Development of CAR T Cells Expressing a Suicide Gene Plus a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Targeting Signaling Lymphocytic-Activation Molecule F7. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 702–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhou, X.; Di Stasi, A.; Tey, S.K.; Krance, R.A.; Martinez, C.; Leung, K.S.; Durett, A.G.; Wu, M.F.; Liu, H.; Leen, A.M.; et al. Long-term outcome after haploidentical stem cell transplant and infusion of T cells expressing the inducible caspase 9 safety transgene. Blood 2014, 123, 3895–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hsu, C.; Abad, J.D.; Morgan, R.A. Characterization of human T lymphocytes engineered to express interleukin-15 and herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase. J. Surg. Res. 2013, 184, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gu, X.; He, D.; Li, C.; Wang, H.; Yang, G. Development of Inducible CD19-CAR T Cells with a Tet-On System for Controlled Activity and Enhanced Clinical Safety. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sakemura, R.; Terakura, S.; Watanabe, K.; Julamanee, J.; Takagi, E.; Miyao, K.; Koyama, D.; Goto, T.; Hanajiri, R.; Nishida, T.; et al. A Tet-On Inducible System for Controlling CD19-Chimeric Antigen Receptor Expression upon Drug Administration. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2016, 4, 658–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Drent, E.; Poels, R.; Mulders, M.J.; van de Donk, N.; Themeli, M.; Lokhorst, H.M.; Mutis, T. Feasibility of controlling CD38-CAR T cell activity with a Tet-on inducible CAR design. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mamonkin, M.; Mukherjee, M.; Srinivasan, M.; Sharma, S.; Gomes-Silva, D.; Mo, F.; Krenciute, G.; Orange, J.S.; Brenner, M.K. Reversible Transgene Expression Reduces Fratricide and Permits 4-1BB Costimulation of CAR T Cells Directed to T-cell Malignancies. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2018, 6, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lee, Y.G.; Marks, I.; Srinivasarao, M.; Kanduluru, A.K.; Mahalingam, S.M.; Liu, X.; Chu, H.; Low, P.S. Use of a Single CAR T Cell and Several Bispecific Adapters Facilitates Eradication of Multiple Antigenically Different Solid Tumors. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, E.; Gu, J.; Xue, J.; Lin, C.; Liu, C.; Li, M.; Hao, J.; Setrerrahmane, S.; Chi, X.; Qi, W.; et al. Accurate control of dual-receptor-engineered T cell activity through a bifunctional anti-angiogenic peptide. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pellegrino, C.; Favalli, N.; Sandholzer, M.; Volta, L.; Bassi, G.; Millul, J.; Cazzamalli, S.; Matasci, M.; Villa, A.; Myburgh, R.; et al. Impact of Ligand Size and Conjugation Chemistry on the Performance of Universal Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells for Tumor Killing. Bioconjug. Chem. 2020, 31, 1775–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qi, J.; Tsuji, K.; Hymel, D.; Burke, T.R., Jr.; Hudecek, M.; Rader, C.; Peng, H. Chemically Programmable and Switchable CAR-T Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 12178–12185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zah, E.; Lin, M.Y.; Silva-Benedict, A.; Jensen, M.C.; Chen, Y.Y. T Cells Expressing CD19/CD20 Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptors Prevent Antigen Escape by Malignant B Cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2016, 4, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qin, H.; Ramakrishna, S.; Nguyen, S.; Fountaine, T.J.; Ponduri, A.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Yuan, C.M.; Haso, W.; Shern, J.F.; Shah, N.N.; et al. Preclinical Development of Bivalent Chimeric Antigen Receptors Targeting Both CD19 and CD22. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2018, 11, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ormhøj, M.; Scarfò, I.; Cabral, M.L.; Bailey, S.R.; Lorrey, S.J.; Bouffard, A.A.; Castano, A.P.; Larson, R.C.; Riley, L.S.; Schmidts, A.; et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Targeting CD79b Show Efficacy in Lymphoma with or without Cotargeting CD19. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 7046–7057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Scarfò, I.; Ormhøj, M.; Frigault, M.J.; Castano, A.P.; Lorrey, S.; Bouffard, A.A.; van Scoyk, A.; Rodig, S.J.; Shay, A.J.; Aster, J.C.; et al. Anti-CD37 chimeric antigen receptor T cells are active against B- and T-cell lymphomas. Blood 2018, 132, 1495–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Spiegel, J.Y.; Patel, S.; Muffly, L.; Hossain, N.M.; Oak, J.; Baird, J.H.; Frank, M.J.; Shiraz, P.; Sahaf, B.; Craig, J.; et al. CAR T cells with dual targeting of CD19 and CD22 in adult patients with recurrent or refractory B cell malignancies: A phase 1 trial. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ge, W.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Wei, G.; Han, L.; Wang, H.; Yu, S.; et al. CRISPR/Cas9-Engineered Universal CD19/CD22 Dual-Targeted CAR-T Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 2764–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tong, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ji, X.; Zhang, W.; Guo, Y.; Han, X.; Ti, D.; Dai, H.; Wang, C.; et al. Optimized tandem CD19/CD20 CAR-engineered T cells in refractory/relapsed B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2020, 136, 1632–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schneider, D.; Xiong, Y.; Wu, D.; Nölle, V.; Schmitz, S.; Haso, W.; Kaiser, A.; Dropulic, B.; Orentas, R.J. A tandem CD19/CD20 CAR lentiviral vector drives on-target and off-target antigen modulation in leukemia cell lines. J. Immunother. Cancer 2017, 5, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dual CD19/CD22 CAR T Cells Show Feasibility in Pediatric/Young Adult B-ALL. Cancer Discov. 2021, 11, 2958. [CrossRef]
  58. Fousek, K.; Watanabe, J.; Joseph, S.K.; George, A.; An, X.; Byrd, T.T.; Morris, J.S.; Luong, A.; Martínez-Paniagua, M.A.; Sanber, K.; et al. CAR T-cells that target acute B-lineage leukemia irrespective of CD19 expression. Leukemia 2021, 35, 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Funk, C.R.; Wang, S.; Chen, K.Z.; Waller, A.; Sharma, A.; Edgar, C.L.; Gupta, V.A.; Chandrakasan, S.; Zoine, J.T.; Fedanov, A.; et al. PI3Kδ/γ inhibition promotes human CART cell epigenetic and metabolic reprogramming to enhance antitumor cytotoxicity. Blood 2022, 139, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gauthier, J.; Hirayama, A.V.; Purushe, J.; Hay, K.A.; Lymp, J.; Li, D.H.; Yeung, C.C.S.; Sheih, A.; Pender, B.S.; Hawkins, R.M.; et al. Feasibility and efficacy of CD19-targeted CAR T cells with concurrent ibrutinib for CLL after ibrutinib failure. Blood 2020, 135, 1650–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Long, M.; Beckwith, K.; Do, P.; Mundy, B.L.; Gordon, A.; Lehman, A.M.; Maddocks, K.J.; Cheney, C.; Jones, J.A.; Flynn, J.M.; et al. Ibrutinib treatment improves T cell number and function in CLL patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3052–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Fan, F.; Yoo, H.J.; Stock, S.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Schubert, M.L.; Wang, S.; Neuber, B.; Hückelhoven-Krauss, A.; Gern, U.; et al. Ibrutinib for improved chimeric antigen receptor T-cell production for chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 148, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ruella, M.; Kenderian, S.S.; Shestova, O.; Klichinsky, M.; Melenhorst, J.J.; Wasik, M.A.; Lacey, S.F.; June, C.H.; Gill, S. Kinase inhibitor ibrutinib to prevent cytokine-release syndrome after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells for B-cell neoplasms. Leukemia 2017, 31, 246–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yang, M.; Wang, L.; Ni, M.; Neuber, B.; Wang, S.; Gong, W.; Sauer, T.; Sellner, L.; Schubert, M.L.; Hückelhoven-Krauss, A.; et al. Pre-sensitization of Malignant B Cells Through Venetoclax Significantly Improves the Cytotoxic Efficacy of CD19.CAR-T Cells. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 608167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ricciuti, B.; Leonardi, G.C.; Puccetti, P.; Fallarino, F.; Bianconi, V.; Sahebkar, A.; Baglivo, S.; Chiari, R.; Pirro, M. Targeting indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase in cancer: Scientific rationale and clinical evidence. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 196, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ninomiya, S.; Narala, N.; Huye, L.; Yagyu, S.; Savoldo, B.; Dotti, G.; Heslop, H.E.; Brenner, M.K.; Rooney, C.M.; Ramos, C.A. Tumor indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibits CD19-CAR T cells and is downregulated by lymphodepleting drugs. Blood 2015, 125, 3905–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. McLane, L.M.; Abdel-Hakeem, M.S.; Wherry, E.J. CD8 T Cell Exhaustion During Chronic Viral Infection and Cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2019, 37, 457–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Speiser, D.E.; Ho, P.C.; Verdeil, G. Regulatory circuits of T cell function in cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 599–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kenderian, S.S.; Ruella, M.; Shestova, O.; Klichinsky, M.; Kim, M.Y.; Porter, D.L.; June, C.H.; Gill, S.I. Identification of PD1 and TIM3 As Checkpoints That Limit Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Efficacy in Leukemia. Blood 2015, 126, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Deng, Q.; Han, G.; Puebla-Osorio, N.; Ma, M.C.J.; Strati, P.; Chasen, B.; Dai, E.; Dang, M.; Jain, N.; Yang, H.; et al. Characteristics of anti-CD19 CAR T cell infusion products associated with efficacy and toxicity in patients with large B cell lymphomas. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1878–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Finney, O.C.; Brakke, H.M.; Rawlings-Rhea, S.; Hicks, R.; Doolittle, D.; Lopez, M.; Futrell, R.B.; Orentas, R.J.; Li, D.; Gardner, R.A.; et al. CD19 CAR T cell product and disease attributes predict leukemia remission durability. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 2123–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, A.M.; Hucks, G.E.; Dinofia, A.M.; Seif, A.E.; Teachey, D.T.; Baniewicz, D.; Callahan, C.; Fasano, C.; McBride, B.; Gonzalez, V.; et al. Checkpoint Inhibitors Augment CD19-Directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy in Relapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Blood 2018, 132, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Toffalori, C.; Zito, L.; Gambacorta, V.; Riba, M.; Oliveira, G.; Bucci, G.; Barcella, M.; Spinelli, O.; Greco, R.; Crucitti, L.; et al. Immune signature drives leukemia escape and relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zhou, J.E.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yu, L.; Yan, Z. ShRNA-mediated silencing of PD-1 augments the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cells on subcutaneous prostate and leukemia xenograft. Biomed Pharm. 2021, 137, 111339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ren, J.; Liu, X.; Fang, C.; Jiang, S.; June, C.H.; Zhao, Y. Multiplex Genome Editing to Generate Universal CAR T Cells Resistant to PD1 Inhibition. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 2255–2266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hu, B.; Zou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Tang, J.; Niedermann, G.; Firat, E.; Huang, X.; Zhu, X. Nucleofection with Plasmid DNA for CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Inactivation of Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 in CD133-Specific CAR T Cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 2019, 30, 446–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yin, Y.; Boesteanu, A.C.; Binder, Z.A.; Xu, C.; Reid, R.A.; Rodriguez, J.L.; Cook, D.R.; Thokala, R.; Blouch, K.; McGettigan-Croce, B.; et al. Checkpoint Blockade Reverses Anergy in IL-13Rα2 Humanized scFv-Based CAR T Cells to Treat Murine and Canine Gliomas. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2018, 11, 20–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Cao, Y.; Lu, W.; Sun, R.; Jin, X.; Cheng, L.; He, X.; Wang, L.; Yuan, T.; Lyu, C.; Zhao, M. Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Combination With Nivolumab Are Safe and Effective Against Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Non-hodgkin Lymphoma. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Venkiteshwaran, A. Tocilizumab. MAbs 2009, 1, 432–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Maude, S.L.; Frey, N.; Shaw, P.A.; Aplenc, R.; Barrett, D.M.; Bunin, N.J.; Chew, A.; Gonzalez, V.E.; Zheng, Z.; Lacey, S.F.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Maude, S.L.; Barrett, D.; Teachey, D.T.; Grupp, S.A. Managing cytokine release syndrome associated with novel T cell-engaging therapies. Cancer J. 2014, 20, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Grupp, S.A.; Kalos, M.; Barrett, D.; Aplenc, R.; Porter, D.L.; Rheingold, S.R.; Teachey, D.T.; Chew, A.; Hauck, B.; Wright, J.F.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1509–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gardner, R.A.; Ceppi, F.; Rivers, J.; Annesley, C.; Summers, C.; Taraseviciute, A.; Gust, J.; Leger, K.J.; Tarlock, K.; Cooper, T.M.; et al. Preemptive mitigation of CD19 CAR T-cell cytokine release syndrome without attenuation of antileukemic efficacy. Blood 2019, 134, 2149–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Nishimoto, N.; Terao, K.; Mima, T.; Nakahara, H.; Takagi, N.; Kakehi, T. Mechanisms and pathologic significances in increase in serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble IL-6 receptor after administration of an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, tocilizumab, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and Castleman disease. Blood 2008, 112, 3959–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kurzrock, R.; Voorhees, P.M.; Casper, C.; Furman, R.R.; Fayad, L.; Lonial, S.; Borghaei, H.; Jagannath, S.; Sokol, L.; Usmani, S.Z.; et al. A phase I, open-label study of siltuximab, an anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or Castleman disease. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 3659–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. van Rhee, F.; Fayad, L.; Voorhees, P.; Furman, R.; Lonial, S.; Borghaei, H.; Sokol, L.; Crawford, J.; Cornfeld, M.; Qi, M.; et al. Siltuximab, a novel anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, for Castleman’s disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 28, 3701–3708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lipe, B.C.; Renaud, T. Siltuximab as a primary treatment for cytokine release syndrome in a patient receiving a bispecific antibody in a clinical trial setting. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pract. 2022, 10781552221140320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tan, A.H.J.; Vinanica, N.; Campana, D. Chimeric antigen receptor-T cells with cytokine neutralizing capacity. Blood Adv. 2020, 4, 1419–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wehrli, M.; Gallagher, K.; Chen, Y.B.; Leick, M.B.; McAfee, S.L.; El-Jawahri, A.R.; DeFilipp, Z.; Horick, N.; O’Donnell, P.; Spitzer, T.; et al. Single-center experience using anakinra for steroid-refractory immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e003847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sandler, R.D.; Carter, S.; Kaur, H.; Francis, S.; Tattersall, R.S.; Snowden, J.A. Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)-time to reappraise with modern diagnostic and treatment strategies? Bone Marrow Transpl. 2020, 55, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sachdeva, M.; Duchateau, P.; Depil, S.; Poirot, L.; Valton, J. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor inactivation in CAR T-cells prevents monocyte-dependent release of key cytokine release syndrome mediators. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 5430–5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Gust, J.; Hay, K.A.; Hanafi, L.A.; Li, D.; Myerson, D.; Gonzalez-Cuyar, L.F.; Yeung, C.; Liles, W.C.; Wurfel, M.; Lopez, J.A.; et al. Endothelial Activation and Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption in Neurotoxicity after Adoptive Immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T Cells. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 1404–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Sterner, R.M.; Kenderian, S.S. Myeloid cell and cytokine interactions with chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy: Implication for future therapies. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2020, 27, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Neelapu, S.S.; Locke, F.L.; Bartlett, N.L.; Lekakis, L.J.; Miklos, D.B.; Jacobson, C.A.; Braunschweig, I.; Oluwole, O.O.; Siddiqi, T.; Lin, Y.; et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2531–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sterner, R.M.; Cox, M.J.; Sakemura, R.; Kenderian, S.S. Using CRISPR/Cas9 to Knock Out GM-CSF in CAR-T Cells. J. Vis. Exp. 2019, 149, e59629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Burga, R.A.; Thorn, M.; Point, G.R.; Guha, P.; Nguyen, C.T.; Licata, L.A.; DeMatteo, R.P.; Ayala, A.; Joseph Espat, N.; Junghans, R.P.; et al. Liver myeloid-derived suppressor cells expand in response to liver metastases in mice and inhibit the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-CEA CAR-T. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2015, 64, 817–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Staedtke, V.; Bai, R.Y.; Kim, K.; Darvas, M.; Davila, M.L.; Riggins, G.J.; Rothman, P.B.; Papadopoulos, N.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B.; et al. Disruption of a self-amplifying catecholamine loop reduces cytokine release syndrome. Nature 2018, 564, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Huarte, E.; O’Connor, R.S.; Peel, M.T.; Nunez-Cruz, S.; Leferovich, J.; Juvekar, A.; Yang, Y.O.; Truong, L.; Huang, T.; Naim, A.; et al. Itacitinib (INCB039110), a JAK1 Inhibitor, Reduces Cytokines Associated with Cytokine Release Syndrome Induced by CAR T-cell Therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 6299–6309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, S.; Wang, X.; Yuan, Z.; Liu, L.; Luo, L.; Li, Y.; Wu, K.; Liu, J.; Yang, C.; Li, Z.; et al. Eradication of T-ALL Cells by CD7-targeted Universal CAR-T Cells and Initial Test of Ruxolitinib-based CRS Management. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 1242–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zi, F.M.; Ye, L.L.; Zheng, J.F.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Q.M. Using JAK inhibitor to treat cytokine release syndrome developed after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for patients with refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A case report. Medicine 2021, 100, e25786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mestermann, K.; Giavridis, T.; Weber, J.; Rydzek, J.; Frenz, S.; Nerreter, T.; Mades, A.; Sadelain, M.; Einsele, H.; Hudecek, M. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib acts as a pharmacologic on/off switch for CAR T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau5907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhang, X.; Jin, X.; Sun, R.; Zhang, M.; Lu, W.; Zhao, M. Gene knockout in cellular immunotherapy: Application and limitations. Cancer Lett. 2022, 540, 215736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pavlovic, K.; Tristán-Manzano, M.; Maldonado-Pérez, N.; Cortijo-Gutierrez, M.; Sánchez-Hernández, S.; Justicia-Lirio, P.; Carmona, M.D.; Herrera, C.; Martin, F.; Benabdellah, K. Using Gene Editing Approaches to Fine-Tune the Immune System. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 570672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Huang, N.; Huang, Z.; Gao, M.; Luo, Z.; Zhou, F.; Liu, L.; Xiao, Q.; Wang, X.; Feng, W. Induction of apoptosis in imatinib sensitive and resistant chronic myeloid leukemia cells by efficient disruption of bcr-abl oncogene with zinc finger nucleases. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Conway, A.; Mendel, M.; Kim, K.; McGovern, K.; Boyko, A.; Zhang, L.; Miller, J.C.; DeKelver, R.C.; Paschon, D.E.; Mui, B.L.; et al. Non-viral Delivery of Zinc Finger Nuclease mRNA Enables Highly Efficient In Vivo Genome Editing of Multiple Therapeutic Gene Targets. Mol. Ther. 2019, 27, 866–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Qasim, W.; Zhan, H.; Samarasinghe, S.; Adams, S.; Amrolia, P.; Stafford, S.; Butler, K.; Rivat, C.; Wright, G.; Somana, K.; et al. Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaj2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, C.; Cheng, A.W.; Zhang, X.; Li, N.; Xia, C.; Wei, X.; Liu, X.; Wang, H. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated multiplex gene editing in CAR-T cells. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 154–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Seki, A.; Rutz, S. Optimized RNP transfection for highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout in primary T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2018, 215, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Dai, X.; Park, J.J.; Du, Y.; Na, Z.; Lam, S.Z.; Chow, R.D.; Renauer, P.A.; Gu, J.; Xin, S.; Chu, Z.; et al. Massively parallel knock-in engineering of human T cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Rabilloud, T.; Potier, D.; Pankaew, S.; Nozais, M.; Loosveld, M.; Payet-Bornet, D. Single-cell profiling identifies pre-existing CD19-negative subclones in a B-ALL patient with CD19-negative relapse after CAR-T therapy. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gardner, R.; Wu, D.; Cherian, S.; Fang, M.; Hanafi, L.A.; Finney, O.; Smithers, H.; Jensen, M.C.; Riddell, S.R.; Maloney, D.G.; et al. Acquisition of a CD19-negative myeloid phenotype allows immune escape of MLL-rearranged B-ALL from CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy. Blood 2016, 127, 2406–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Vacaflores, A.; Freedman, S.N.; Chapman, N.M.; Houtman, J.C. Pretreatment of activated human CD8 T cells with IL-12 leads to enhanced TCR-induced signaling and cytokine production. Mol. Immunol. 2017, 81, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Vacaflores, A.; Chapman, N.M.; Harty, J.T.; Richer, M.J.; Houtman, J.C. Exposure of Human CD4 T Cells to IL-12 Results in Enhanced TCR-Induced Cytokine Production, Altered TCR Signaling, and Increased Oxidative Metabolism. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Choi, J.N.; Sun, E.G.; Cho, S.H. IL-12 Enhances Immune Response by Modulation of Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells in Tumor Microenvironment. Chonnam Med. J. 2019, 55, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kueberuwa, G.; Kalaitsidou, M.; Cheadle, E.; Hawkins, R.E.; Gilham, D.E. CD19 CAR T Cells Expressing IL-12 Eradicate Lymphoma in Fully Lymphoreplete Mice through Induction of Host Immunity. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2018, 8, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Avanzi, M.P.; Yeku, O.; Li, X.; Wijewarnasuriya, D.P.; van Leeuwen, D.G.; Cheung, K.; Park, H.; Purdon, T.J.; Daniyan, A.F.; Spitzer, M.H.; et al. Engineered Tumor-Targeted T Cells Mediate Enhanced Anti-Tumor Efficacy Both Directly and through Activation of the Endogenous Immune System. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 2130–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hoyos, V.; Savoldo, B.; Quintarelli, C.; Mahendravada, A.; Zhang, M.; Vera, J.; Heslop, H.E.; Rooney, C.M.; Brenner, M.K.; Dotti, G. Engineering CD19-specific T lymphocytes with interleukin-15 and a suicide gene to enhance their anti-lymphoma/leukemia effects and safety. Leukemia 2010, 24, 1160–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kasakovski, D.; Xu, L.; Li, Y. T cell senescence and CAR-T cell exhaustion in hematological malignancies. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Riches, J.C.; Davies, J.K.; McClanahan, F.; Fatah, R.; Iqbal, S.; Agrawal, S.; Ramsay, A.G.; Gribben, J.G. T cells from CLL patients exhibit features of T-cell exhaustion but retain capacity for cytokine production. Blood 2013, 121, 1612–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Hoffmann, J.M.; Schubert, M.L.; Wang, L.; Hückelhoven, A.; Sellner, L.; Stock, S.; Schmitt, A.; Kleist, C.; Gern, U.; Loskog, A.; et al. Differences in Expansion Potential of Naive Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells from Healthy Donors and Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Fraietta, J.A.; Lacey, S.F.; Orlando, E.J.; Pruteanu-Malinici, I.; Gohil, M.; Lundh, S.; Boesteanu, A.C.; Wang, Y.; O’Connor, R.S.; Hwang, W.T.; et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Nishimura, T.; Kaneko, S.; Kawana-Tachikawa, A.; Tajima, Y.; Goto, H.; Zhu, D.; Nakayama-Hosoya, K.; Iriguchi, S.; Uemura, Y.; Shimizu, T.; et al. Generation of rejuvenated antigen-specific T cells by reprogramming to pluripotency and redifferentiation. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 12, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Crompton, J.G.; Clever, D.; Vizcardo, R.; Rao, M.; Restifo, N.P. Reprogramming antitumor immunity. Trends. Immunol. 2014, 35, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Jin, X.; Lu, W.; Zhang, M.; Xiong, X.; Sun, R.; Wei, Y.; He, X.; Zhao, M. Infection Temperature Affects the Phenotype and Function of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Produced via Lentiviral Technology. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 638907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kaartinen, T.; Luostarinen, A.; Maliniemi, P.; Keto, J.; Arvas, M.; Belt, H.; Koponen, J.; Mäkinen, P.I.; Loskog, A.; Mustjoki, S.; et al. Low interleukin-2 concentration favors generation of early memory T cells over effector phenotypes during chimeric antigen receptor T-cell expansion. Cytotherapy 2017, 19, 689–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Gattinoni, L.; Finkelstein, S.E.; Klebanoff, C.A.; Antony, P.A.; Palmer, D.C.; Spiess, P.J.; Hwang, L.N.; Yu, Z.; Wrzesinski, C.; Heimann, D.M.; et al. Removal of homeostatic cytokine sinks by lymphodepletion enhances the efficacy of adoptively transferred tumor-specific CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Xu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ramos, C.A.; Durett, A.; Liu, E.; Dakhova, O.; Liu, H.; Creighton, C.J.; Gee, A.P.; Heslop, H.E.; et al. Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR.CD19-T cells and are preserved by IL-7 and IL-15. Blood 2014, 123, 3750–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hurton, L.V.; Singh, H.; Najjar, A.M.; Switzer, K.C.; Mi, T.; Maiti, S.; Olivares, S.; Rabinovich, B.; Huls, H.; Forget, M.A.; et al. Tethered IL-15 augments antitumor activity and promotes a stem-cell memory subset in tumor-specific T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E7788–E7797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Alizadeh, D.; Wong, R.A.; Yang, X.; Wang, D.; Pecoraro, J.R.; Kuo, C.F.; Aguilar, B.; Qi, Y.; Ann, D.K.; Starr, R.; et al. IL15 Enhances CAR-T Cell Antitumor Activity by Reducing mTORC1 Activity and Preserving Their Stem Cell Memory Phenotype. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019, 7, 759–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tormo, A.; Khodayarian, F.; Cui, Y.; Al-Chami, E.; Kanjarawi, R.; Noé, B.; Wang, H.; Rafei, M. Interleukin-21 promotes thymopoiesis recovery following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2017, 10, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Al-Chami, E.; Tormo, A.; Pasquin, S.; Kanjarawi, R.; Ziouani, S.; Rafei, M. Interleukin-21 administration to aged mice rejuvenates their peripheral T-cell pool by triggering de novo thymopoiesis. Aging Cell 2016, 15, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Singh, H.; Figliola, M.J.; Dawson, M.J.; Huls, H.; Olivares, S.; Switzer, K.; Mi, T.; Maiti, S.; Kebriaei, P.; Lee, D.A.; et al. Reprogramming CD19-specific T cells with IL-21 signaling can improve adoptive immunotherapy of B-lineage malignancies. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 3516–3527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Baird, J.H.; Frank, M.J.; Craig, J.; Patel, S.; Spiegel, J.Y.; Sahaf, B.; Oak, J.S.; Younes, S.F.; Ozawa, M.G.; Yang, E.; et al. CD22-directed CAR T-cell therapy induces complete remissions in CD19-directed CAR-refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2021, 137, 2321–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Wang, N.; Hu, X.; Cao, W.; Li, C.; Xiao, Y.; Cao, Y.; Gu, C.; Zhang, S.; Chen, L.; Cheng, J.; et al. Efficacy and safety of CAR19/22 T-cell cocktail therapy in patients with refractory/relapsed B-cell malignancies. Blood 2020, 135, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Rao, Q.; Wang, H.; Xing, H.; Tian, Z.; Tang, K.; et al. A novel and efficient CD22 CAR-T therapy induced a robust antitumor effect in relapsed/refractory leukemia patients when combined with CD19 CAR-T treatment as a sequential therapy. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yan, N.; Wang, N.; Wang, G.; Huang, L.; Li, C.; Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Huang, L.; Meng, F.; Wei, J.; et al. CAR19/22 T cell cocktail therapy for B-ALL relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cytotherapy 2022, 24, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yan, L.; Qu, S.; Shang, J.; Shi, X.; Kang, L.; Xu, N.; Zhu, M.; Zhou, J.; Jin, S.; Yao, W.; et al. Sequential CD19 and BCMA-specific CAR T-cell treatment elicits sustained remission of relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Meng, Y.; Deng, B.; Rong, L.; Li, C.; Song, W.; Ling, Z.; Xu, J.; Duan, J.; Wang, Z.; Chang, A.H.; et al. Short-Interval Sequential CAR-T Cell Infusion May Enhance Prior CAR-T Cell Expansion to Augment Anti-Lymphoma Response in B-NHL. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 640166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yan, L.Z.; Shang, J.J.; Kang, L.Q.; Shi, X.L.; Zhou, J.; Jin, S.; Yao, W.Q.; Yao, Y.; Chen, G.H.; Zhu, Z.L.; et al. Combined Infusion of CD19 and Bcma-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for RRMM: Initial Safety and Efficacy Report from a Clinical Pilot Study. Blood 2017, 130, 2. [Google Scholar]
  140. Liu, Y.; Deng, B.; Hu, B.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Yang, J.; et al. Sequential different B-cell antigen-targeted CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric refractory/relapsed Burkitt lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 717–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Du, J.; Zhang, Y. Sequential anti-CD19, 22, and 20 autologous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) treatments of a child with relapsed refractory Burkitt lymphoma: A case report and literature review. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 146, 1575–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Sommermeyer, D.; Hill, T.; Shamah, S.M.; Salter, A.I.; Chen, Y.; Mohler, K.M.; Riddell, S.R. Fully human CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors for T-cell therapy. Leukemia 2017, 31, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Maus, M.V.; Haas, A.R.; Beatty, G.L.; Albelda, S.M.; Levine, B.L.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Kalos, M.; June, C.H. T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors can cause anaphylaxis in humans. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2013, 1, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Cao, J.; Wang, G.; Cheng, H.; Wei, C.; Qi, K.; Sang, W.; Zhenyu, L.; Shi, M.; Li, H.; Qiao, J.; et al. Potent anti-leukemia activities of humanized CD19-targeted Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am. J. Hematol. 2018, 93, 851–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Brudno, J.N.; Lam, N.; Vanasse, D.; Shen, Y.W.; Rose, J.J.; Rossi, J.; Xue, A.; Bot, A.; Scholler, N.; Mikkilineni, L.; et al. Safety and feasibility of anti-CD19 CAR T cells with fully human binding domains in patients with B-cell lymphoma. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Brudno, J.N.; Hartman, S.D.; Pittaluga, S.; Stroncek, D.; Lam, N.; Kanakry, J.A.; Pavletic, S.Z.; Mikkilineni, L.; Bagheri, M.; Roschewski, M.J.; et al. Clinical anti-lymphoma activity and toxicity of T cells expressing a novel anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor with fully-human variable regions. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Almåsbak, H.; Walseng, E.; Kristian, A.; Myhre, M.R.; Suso, E.M.; Munthe, L.A.; Andersen, J.T.; Wang, M.Y.; Kvalheim, G.; Gaudernack, G.; et al. Inclusion of an IgG1-Fc spacer abrogates efficacy of CD19 CAR T cells in a xenograft mouse model. Gene Ther. 2015, 22, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Haso, W.; Lee, D.W.; Shah, N.N.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Yuan, C.M.; Pastan, I.H.; Dimitrov, D.S.; Morgan, R.A.; FitzGerald, D.J.; Barrett, D.M.; et al. Anti-CD22-chimeric antigen receptors targeting B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2013, 121, 1165–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Schäfer, D.; Henze, J.; Pfeifer, R.; Schleicher, A.; Brauner, J.; Mockel-Tenbrinck, N.; Barth, C.; Gudert, D.; Al Rawashdeh, W.; Johnston, I.C.D.; et al. A Novel Siglec-4 Derived Spacer Improves the Functionality of CAR T Cells Against Membrane-Proximal Epitopes. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Hombach, A.; Hombach, A.A.; Abken, H. Adoptive immunotherapy with genetically engineered T cells: Modification of the IgG1 Fc ‘spacer’ domain in the extracellular moiety of chimeric antigen receptors avoids ‘off-target’ activation and unintended initiation of an innate immune response. Gene Ther. 2010, 17, 1206–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hudecek, M.; Sommermeyer, D.; Kosasih, P.L.; Silva-Benedict, A.; Liu, L.; Rader, C.; Jensen, M.C.; Riddell, S.R. The nonsignaling extracellular spacer domain of chimeric antigen receptors is decisive for in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015, 3, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Gonzalez-Garcia, P.; Muñoz-Miranda, J.P.; Fernandez-Cisnal, R.; Olvera, L.; Moares, N.; Gabucio, A.; Fernandez-Ponce, C.; Garcia-Cozar, F. Specific Activation of T Cells by an ACE2-Based CAR-Like Receptor upon Recognition of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Majzner, R.G.; Rietberg, S.P.; Sotillo, E.; Dong, R.; Vachharajani, V.T.; Labanieh, L.; Myklebust, J.H.; Kadapakkam, M.; Weber, E.W.; Tousley, A.M.; et al. Tuning the Antigen Density Requirement for CAR T-cell Activity. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 702–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Alabanza, L.; Pegues, M.; Geldres, C.; Shi, V.; Wiltzius, J.J.W.; Sievers, S.A.; Yang, S.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Function of Novel Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptors with Human Variable Regions Is Affected by Hinge and Transmembrane Domains. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 2452–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ying, Z.; Huang, X.F.; Xiang, X.; Liu, Y.; Kang, X.; Song, Y.; Guo, X.; Liu, H.; Ding, N.; Zhang, T.; et al. A safe and potent anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Freyer, C.W.; Porter, D.L. Cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity following CAR T-cell therapy for hematologic malignancies. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 940–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kawalekar, O.U.; O’Connor, R.S.; Fraietta, J.A.; Guo, L.; McGettigan, S.E.; Posey, A.D., Jr.; Patel, P.R.; Guedan, S.; Scholler, J.; Keith, B.; et al. Distinct Signaling of Coreceptors Regulates Specific Metabolism Pathways and Impacts Memory Development in CAR T Cells. Immunity 2016, 44, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Salter, A.I.; Ivey, R.G.; Kennedy, J.J.; Voillet, V.; Rajan, A.; Alderman, E.J.; Voytovich, U.J.; Lin, C.; Sommermeyer, D.; Liu, L.; et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of chimeric antigen receptor signaling reveals kinetic and quantitative differences that affect cell function. Sci. Signal. 2018, 11, eaat6753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Milone, M.C.; Fish, J.D.; Carpenito, C.; Carroll, R.G.; Binder, G.K.; Teachey, D.; Samanta, M.; Lakhal, M.; Gloss, B.; Danet-Desnoyers, G.; et al. Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo. Mol. Ther. 2009, 17, 1453–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. van der Stegen, S.J.; Hamieh, M.; Sadelain, M. The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Long, A.H.; Haso, W.M.; Shern, J.F.; Wanhainen, K.M.; Murgai, M.; Ingaramo, M.; Smith, J.P.; Walker, A.J.; Kohler, M.E.; Venkateshwara, V.R.; et al. 4-1BB costimulation ameliorates T cell exhaustion induced by tonic signaling of chimeric antigen receptors. Nat. Med. 2015, 21, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhao, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Lu, X.A.; Xiong, M.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, X.; Qi, F.; He, T.; Ding, Y.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of CD28- or 4-1BB-Based CD19 CAR-T Cells in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Mol. Ther. Oncolytics 2020, 18, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Schmidts, A.; Wehrli, M.; Maus, M.V. Toward Better Understanding and Management of CAR-T Cell-Associated Toxicity. Annu. Rev. Med. 2021, 72, 365–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Tedesco, V.E.t.; Mohan, C. Biomarkers for Predicting Cytokine Release Syndrome following CD19-Targeted CAR T Cell Therapy. J. Immunol. 2021, 206, 1561–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Norelli, M.; Camisa, B.; Barbiera, G.; Falcone, L.; Purevdorj, A.; Genua, M.; Sanvito, F.; Ponzoni, M.; Doglioni, C.; Cristofori, P.; et al. Monocyte-derived IL-1 and IL-6 are differentially required for cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity due to CAR T cells. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Teachey, D.T.; Lacey, S.F.; Shaw, P.A.; Melenhorst, J.J.; Maude, S.L.; Frey, N.; Pequignot, E.; Gonzalez, V.E.; Chen, F.; Finklestein, J.; et al. Identification of Predictive Biomarkers for Cytokine Release Syndrome after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2016, 6, 664–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Santomasso, B.D.; Park, J.H.; Salloum, D.; Riviere, I.; Flynn, J.; Mead, E.; Halton, E.; Wang, X.; Senechal, B.; Purdon, T.; et al. Clinical and Biological Correlates of Neurotoxicity Associated with CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 958–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Garbers, C.; Heink, S.; Korn, T.; Rose-John, S. Interleukin-6: Designing specific therapeutics for a complex cytokine. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 395–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Jones, S.A.; Jenkins, B.J. Recent insights into targeting the IL-6 cytokine family in inflammatory diseases and cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 773–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Jiang, Z.; Liao, R.; Lv, J.; Li, S.; Zheng, D.; Qin, L.; Wu, D.; Chen, S.; Long, Y.; Wu, Q.; et al. IL-6 trans-signaling promotes the expansion and anti-tumor activity of CAR T cells. Leukemia 2021, 35, 1380–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Jatiani, S.S.; Aleman, A.; Madduri, D.; Chari, A.; Cho, H.J.; Richard, S.; Richter, J.; Brody, J.; Jagannath, S.; Parekh, S. Myeloma CAR-T CRS Management With IL-1R Antagonist Anakinra. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020, 20, 632–636.e631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Zhang, L.; Wang, S.; Xu, J.; Zhang, R.; Zhu, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Li, J.; Chen, L. Etanercept as a new therapeutic option for cytokine release syndrome following chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 10, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Zhou, W.; Chen, W.; Wan, X.; Luo, C.; Du, X.; Li, X.; Chen, Q.; Gao, R.; Zhang, X.; Xie, M.; et al. Benefits of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Lymphoma. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 815679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Miliotou, A.N.; Papadopoulou, L.C. In Vitro-Transcribed (IVT)-mRNA CAR Therapy Development. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2086, 87–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Almåsbak, H.; Rian, E.; Hoel, H.J.; Pulè, M.; Wälchli, S.; Kvalheim, G.; Gaudernack, G.; Rasmussen, A.M. Transiently redirected T cells for adoptive transfer. Cytotherapy 2011, 13, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Panjwani, M.K.; Smith, J.B.; Schutsky, K.; Gnanandarajah, J.; O’Connor, C.M.; Powell, D.J., Jr.; Mason, N.J. Feasibility and Safety of RNA-transfected CD20-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in Dogs with Spontaneous B Cell Lymphoma. Mol. Ther. 2016, 24, 1602–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kenderian, S.S.; Ruella, M.; Shestova, O.; Klichinsky, M.; Aikawa, V.; Morrissette, J.J.; Scholler, J.; Song, D.; Porter, D.L.; Carroll, M.; et al. CD33-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells exhibit potent preclinical activity against human acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2015, 29, 1637–1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Tasian, S.K.; Kenderian, S.S.; Shen, F.; Ruella, M.; Shestova, O.; Kozlowski, M.; Li, Y.; Schrank-Hacker, A.; Morrissette, J.J.D.; Carroll, M.; et al. Optimized depletion of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in murine xenograft models of human acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2017, 129, 2395–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Barrett, D.M.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, S.; Carpenito, C.; Kalos, M.; Carroll, R.G.; June, C.H.; Grupp, S.A. Treatment of advanced leukemia in mice with mRNA engineered T cells. Hum. Gene Ther. 2011, 22, 1575–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sato, T.; Neschadim, A.; Konrad, M.; Fowler, D.H.; Lavie, A.; Medin, J.A. Engineered human tmpk/AZT as a novel enzyme/prodrug axis for suicide gene therapy. Mol. Ther. 2007, 15, 962–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Turtle, C.J.; Hanafi, L.A.; Berger, C.; Gooley, T.A.; Cherian, S.; Hudecek, M.; Sommermeyer, D.; Melville, K.; Pender, B.; Budiarto, T.M.; et al. CD19 CAR-T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 2123–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Frey, N.V.; Shaw, P.A.; Hexner, E.O.; Pequignot, E.; Gill, S.; Luger, S.M.; Mangan, J.K.; Loren, A.W.; Perl, A.E.; Maude, S.L.; et al. Optimizing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 38, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.