Next Article in Journal
Basophil Characteristics as a Marker of the Pathogenesis of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Relation to the Coagulation and Complement Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Sex Differences in the Frequencies of B and T Cell Subpopulations of Human Cord Blood
Previous Article in Journal
Evidence That DDR1 Promotes Oligodendrocyte Differentiation during Development and Myelin Repair after Injury
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complement Drives Chronic Inflammation and Progressive Hydrocephalus in Murine Neonatal Germinal Matrix Hemorrhage
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Increased Expression of Anaphylatoxin C5a-Receptor-1 in Neutrophils and Natural Killer Cells of Preterm Infants

1
Department of Pediatrics, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
2
International Research Training Group 1911, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
3
Institute for Systemic Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
4
German Center of Infection Research, Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
5
Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
6
Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
7
Department of Pediatrics, University of Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(12), 10321; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210321
Submission received: 7 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 19 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Immunology)

Abstract

:
Preterm infants are susceptible to infection and their defense against pathogens relies largely on innate immunity. The role of the complement system for the immunological vulnerability of preterm infants is less understood. Anaphylatoxin C5a and its receptors C5aR1 and -2 are known to be involved in sepsis pathogenesis, with C5aR1 mainly exerting pro-inflammatory effects. Our explorative study aimed to determine age-dependent changes in the expression of C5aR1 and C5aR2 in neonatal immune cell subsets. Via flow cytometry, we analyzed the expression pattern of C5a receptors on immune cells isolated from peripheral blood of preterm infants (n = 32) compared to those of their mothers (n = 25). Term infants and healthy adults served as controls. Preterm infants had a higher intracellular expression of C5aR1 on neutrophils than control individuals. We also found a higher expression of C5aR1 on NK cells, particularly on the cytotoxic CD56dim subset and the CD56- subset. Immune phenotyping of other leukocyte subpopulations revealed no gestational-age-related differences for the expression of and C5aR2. Elevated expression of C5aR1 on neutrophils and NK cells in preterm infants may contribute to the phenomenon of “immunoparalysis” caused by complement activation or to sustained hyper-inflammatory states. Further functional analyses are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

1. Introduction

Preterm infants have a functionally distinct immune system, which is adapted to the immunotolerogenic situation in utero rather than to a defense against pathogens. This leaves preterm infants more susceptible to infections [1,2], which are major causes of morbidity and mortality [3]. As their adaptive immune responses are regarded as inexperienced (naïve for microbial antigens), defense mechanisms are focused on innate immunity and temporary “tolerogenic” mechanisms allowing a physiological microbiome establishment [4,5].
Neutrophils, important as a “first line of defense” against pathogens by recognizing and degrading bacteria and producing anti-microbial peptides (AMPs), are known to be functionally less efficient in preterm infants [6]. They have reduced phagocytic capabilities [7,8], show an impaired formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [9], chemotaxis and bacterial killing, and a reduced capacity to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and AMPs [10,11,12,13].
NK cells, also belonging to the innate immune system and important for spontaneous killing of pathogens and cytokine responses, are also hyporesponsive in neonates [9,14]. They have lower cytolytic capacity and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) than adult NK cells [9,14], which is a maturational issue [15]. Furthermore, the proportions of NK cell subsets differ in neonates and adults. In preterm infants, the immunoregulatory CD56bright NK cells are decreased compared to full-term infants [16,17]. In addition, neonates have more CD56CD16+ NK cells than adults [17], a subset with impaired lytic capacity, which is only detectable in cohorts with reduced immune competence [17,18].
Complement, particularly anaphylatoxin C5a, is a key factor in innate immunity. In sepsis, uncontrolled activation of the complement system [19] leads to substantial generation of C5a [20], which is associated with disease severity, multiorgan failure [21,22] and increased mortality.
Through its two receptors, C5aR1 and C5aR2, C5a exerts a variety of effects. The G-protein-coupled C5aR1 is known to exhibit proinflammatory functions [23,24]. The role of C5aR2 (previously known as GPR77 or C5L2) remains controversial [25,26,27], since pro- as well as anti-inflammatory properties have been demonstrated [28]. C5aR2 was initially suggested to act as a decoy receptor for C5a [29] and modulate C5aR1 signaling [26], prohibiting overactivation of C5aR1. Research groups also suggested a proinflammatory role of the receptor through HMGB1 during sepsis [30]. However, human data are sparse, and so far, no studies exist regarding the role of C5aR1 and C5aR2 in neonatal immunity.
Levels of circulating complement components in neonates are lower than in adults, while data on functionality are scarce. C3- and C4-levels are reduced in preterm infants and correlate inversely with gestational age, while the lytic capacity of the complement system is diminished [31].
In this descriptive study, we investigated the expression of the corresponding receptors C5aR1 and C5aR2 on leucocytes of preterm infants as compared to those of their mothers, term neonates and healthy adult donors.

2. Results

2.1. Cohort Characteristics

We performed a convenience sample study with blood samples obtained from n = 32 preterm infants (between >23 + 5 and <33 ± 0 weeks of gestation) and their mothers (n = 25). Healthy term infants (n = 11) and healthy adults (n = 14) served as controls.
Clinical characteristics of the study cohort are described in Table 1.

2.2. Flow Cytometry

2.2.1. Elevated Intracellular Expression of C5aR1 in Preterm Neutrophils

To distinguish between intracellular and extracellular expression, we split the blood samples of 50 µL each and measured surface expression in one aliquot, while the other aliquot was fixed and permeabilized for measurement of intracellular expression. The percentage of neutrophils expressing C5aR1 intracellularly (Figure 1a) and their MFI of intracellular C5aR1 (Figure 1b) were significantly increased in preterm infants compared to their mothers, adults and term born infants.
In total, 84.10% of preterm neutrophils expressed C5aR1 intracellularly, whereas expression was lower in adults at 15.35% (p < 0.0001), mothers at 8.10% (p < 0.0001) and term newborns at 34.80% (p = 0.004).
The MFI for C5aR1 was also significantly elevated in preterm neutrophils compared to adults (p = 0.0009) and mothers (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1b).
Regarding the extracellular expression of C5aR1, adult neutrophils expressed significantly more C5aR1 on their surface as compared to preterm infant neutrophils (p = 0.027).
C5aR1 expression patterns of neutrophils from preterm infants with early-onset sepsis (EOS) or mothers with amniotic infection syndrome (AIS) did not differ significantly from preterm infants without sepsis and mothers without AIS. We also found no association between C5aR1 expression and gestational age, birth weight or sex.

2.2.2. Density of C5aR1 Expression in NK Cells of Preterm Infants and on Their Surface Is Elevated

As described in Figure 2, NK cells of preterm infants had a higher mean fluorescence intensity of extracellular and intracellular C5aR1 as compared to term infants, mothers, and adult controls (Figure 2).
To determine whether this finding is reflected by a specific subtype of NK cells, gating for different NK cell subsets was applied. This showed an upregulated expression of C5aR1 in the CD56dim and CD56- subsets (Figure 3).
In contrast, CD56bright CD16+ NK cells from term and preterm infants showed a significantly lower MFI for C5aR1 compared to mothers and adults (Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.0001).
The extracellular expression of C5aR1 on NK cells from preterm infants without infection (median-MFI = 3263) was significantly higher compared to infants with EOS or born to mothers with AIS (median-MFI = 2299) (Mann–Whitney test p = 0.009, Figure 4), especially on the CD56dim CD16- subset.
There was no correlation in the expression pattern of C5aR1 on NK cells with gestational age, birth weight or sex.
We also found higher intra- and extracellular mean fluorescence index values for C5aR1 expression in preterm infant B cells and a higher percentage of C5aR1 expression in preterm infants B cells as compared to term infants and adult samples (Supplementary Figures S1 and S2).
There was no correlation of the C5aR1 expression pattern with gestational age, birth weight, gender or infection.
In addition, among the mother-infant pairs, we did not see a correlation of receptor expression between the infants and their respective mothers.

2.2.3. Higher C5aR2 Expression Neutrophils of Preterm and Term Infants as Compared to Healthy Adults

We also analyzed the intracellular expression pattern of C5aR2 and found an elevated expression in neutrophils from term and preterm born infants and mothers compared to adult controls (Figure 5).
We also found significant differences in the distribution of C5aR2 on certain NK cell subsets. CD56bright CD16+ NK cells of preterm and term born infants show a lower individual expression of C5aR2 intracellularly, as measured by MFI, compared to mothers and adults (Kruskal–Wallis test p =< 0.0001, Figure 6a). On CD56bright CD16- NK cells, the MFI of intracellular C5aR2 was significantly higher in preterm born infants compared to mothers, term infants and adults (Kruskal–Wallis test p =< 0.0001, Figure 6b).

3. Discussion

In this explorative study, preterm infants had a higher intracellular expression of C5aR1 on neutrophils compared to term infants and adults. This observed phenomenon may reflect developmental immaturity and therefore contribute to the risk of “immunoparalysis”, uncontrolled hyper-inflammatory states and adverse long-term outcomes (4). On the other hand, the delicate balance of immunological tolerance between mother and fetus is abrogated in the context of preterm delivery, and enhanced C5aR1 expression may be a result of processes leading to preterm birth.
In line with this, previous studies have shown that complement needs to be tightly regulated at the maternal–fetal interface for a favorable pregnancy outcome [32]. Increased levels of C5aR1 may be a result of the disruption of the complement balance due to or resulting in preterm birth.
In the context of infection, an uncontrolled activation of the complement system results in a massive generation of the anaphylatoxin C5a [19,23,33], which, paradoxically, leads to a deficiency in the bacteriocidic function of neutrophils [34,35,36]. In the early phase of infection, the neutrophils are hyperresponsive and overactive [34], leading to a cytokine storm followed by tissue injury and organ damage [22]. The organ damage has been shown to be mediated through C5aR1, which is upregulated on the cell surface of, e.g., kidneys and lungs by IL-6. In our human setting, we found no expression differences of C5aR1 in neutrophils of preterm infants born from an inflammatory context (amniotic infection syndrome with or without early-onset sepsis) as compared to infants without evidence for inflammation at birth.
After binding of C5a, C5aR1 associates with β-Arestin [37] and the complex is then internalized and induces intracellular signal transduction cascades (including ERK1/2), which in neutrophils lead to chemotaxis, degranulation and production of superoxide [38,39,40]. Massive C5a generation, acting on neutrophils for a longer period, however, causes a paralysis of these cells [34,41]. They appear hyporesponsive to activation and show deficiencies in many functions such as chemotaxis, respiratory burst and phagocytosis, as well as in binding of C5a due to a downregulation of C5aR1 on the surface [20,34,42,43]. The reduced expression of C5aR1 on blood neutrophils correlates inversely with the severity of sepsis, mortality rate and outcome [39,44]. The global dysfunction of neutrophils results in the impaired killing of bacteria and therefore in a loss of the innate immune response and “immunoparalysis” [41]. In the context of neonatal immunity, in particular preterm birth, functional data on complement activation leading to “immunoparalysis” is lacking [4]. Our descriptive data support the idea that the production of large amounts of C5a may cause an internalization of C5aR1, which in turn can be detected intracellularly in greater quantity. Vice versa, we detected a lower percentage of C5aR1 on the surface of preterm neutrophils compared to healthy adult donors.
Whether overactivated neutrophils correlate with organ damage in preterm infants is yet unknown; for example, Pataky et al. detected significantly elevated C5a levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of preterm infants compared to term neonates, without a higher rate of acute invasive infections in the preterm cohort [45]. Preterm infants are often faced with an imbalance between tolerance and defense mechanisms [46] and a stronger systemic inflammatory response (SIRS) than the compensatory anti-inflammatory response (CARS).
This imbalance may be sustained through C5a-dependent pathways [47].
Whether our observations translate into a decreased functionality of preterm neutrophils, as has been reported by different research groups [9,48], is yet unknown and requires further study. Increased C5a production may occur in the sustained inflammation of the preterm [4], similar to the elevated basal signaling tone of key mediators of inflammation such as MAP-kinase and NFκB [49], and may also be a feature of a more proinflammatory signature of preterm blood [6].
Higher levels of intracellular C5aR1 in preterm infants may be explained by a pending transfer to the cell surface due to immaturity. Therefore, C5aR1 might still be located intracellularly, where in neutrophils it is most likely not activated and therefore not functional. Additionally, lytic capacity and levels of circulating complement components are lower in preterm infants [31]. This may also be due to a complement consumption exceeding production [50].
The upregulated expression of C5aR2 in neutrophils from mothers, term and preterm born infants compared to adults may be due to the inflammatory processes caused by labor and delivery [32]. The consequence of these elevated C5aR2 levels, however, remains unclear as the function of the receptor is still elusive.
In addition to the expression in neutrophils, we found a higher extracellular and intracellular expression of C5aR1 on NK cells from preterm infants compared to term infants, their mothers and healthy adults.
Complement receptor expressions on NK cells have rarely been investigated, particularly in humans and with regard to the different NK cell subtypes [51,52]. Min et al. [53] detected c5ar1-mRNA and little protein expression of C5aR1 on CD56bright and CD56dim NK cells, which we were able to confirm in all our cohorts, with an increased expression in preterm infants.
As the different NK cell subtypes have different functions [54], we were interested in whether the upregulation in preterm infants could be related to a specific subset. Our data revealed that C5aR1 is only upregulated on the CD56dim or negative subsets, which represent the majority of preterm NK cells [55,56].
The CD56dim subset is more cytotoxic, has more perforin and granzyme, and a higher surface expression of CD16, which is responsible for cell activation and ADCC [57]. Additionally, the ability to produce proinflammatory chemokines as a response to target recognition is greater than in the CD56bright subset [58]. Enhanced activation of these NK cells via C5aR1 in preterm infants could support the development of a proinflammatory response (SIRS), while, due to the generally diminished cytotoxic capacities of neonatal NK cells [59], pathogen elimination is less effective.
The CD56-CD16+ subset is barely existent in healthy adults, but more present in neonates and other patients with an impaired immune function, such as in HIV infection or cytokine therapy [17]. These NK cells were shown to have reduced perforin expression and less capacity to ADCC but were able to produce chemokines such as MIP-1ß [18].
The CD56bright subset, on the other hand, is known to be more immunoregulatory, producing anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and INF-γ [60]. In preterm infants, this subset is not only less frequent ([56] and our own data), but also shows a reduced expression of C5aR1 compared to adults, resulting in less activation and a reduced anti-inflammatory response [61].
Preterm infants with early inflammatory complications (EOS or AIS) display a downregulated expression of C5aR1 on the surface of their NK cells. A downregulation of C5aR1 on neutrophils during sepsis [20,62] inversely correlated with sepsis severity. An association between sepsis and C5aR1 expression has also been shown for NK cells [51]. Enhanced activation of C5aR1 during EOS may result in internalization and a reduced surface expression of the receptor. Findings of a hyporesponsive status of NK cells during sepsis [59] support this theory of C5aR1-mediated immunoparalysis. Additionally, elevated C5a concentrations have been detected in the amniotic fluid of women with microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and preterm birth [63].
Rahman Qazi et al. [16] showed that extremely low birthweight infants, developing sepsis in the first 14 days of life, also display NK cells with a higher CD56dim:CD56bright ratio, while Bochenek et al. [55] observed a significantly decreased amount of immunoregulatory CD56bright NK cells in preterm infants with LOS. We showed that C5aR1 is elevated mainly on the CD56 dim and negative subsets.
Our data support the hypothesis of a higher basal level of inflammation in preterm infants possibly resulting in sustained inflammation (SI) causing long-term morbidities and higher susceptibility to hyperinflammatory reactions with an increased sepsis risk.
To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating gestational-age-dependent differences in the extra- and intracellular expression of C5aR1 and C5aR2 on peripheral blood leukocytes. The study is hypothesis-generating for further studies to explain the pro-inflammatory state that preterm infants are often confronted with [46,64,65]. The limitations of our study are the explorative, descriptive and single-center study design and relatively small cohort size. Further functional data are needed to evaluate a causal link between higher C5aR1 expression in preterm neutrophils or NK cells and impairment of cellular function. We only evaluated samples on day 1–3 of life, which may not predict expression patterns in periods of sepsis. No direct association between the inflammatory context of preterm birth or early-onset sepsis with C5aR1 patterns in neutrophils was found. For outcome-related differences in C5aR1 expression, i.e., late-onset sepsis patients vs. unaffected controls, larger cohort studies are required. We acknowledge that our phenotypic immune cell analysis is limited, as for example NK cells can express several other receptors that are clonally distributed (such as KIR, CLIR and ILT members). Future studies on detailed analyses using mass flow cytometry or chip cytometry can give some additional insights.
As the experimental blockade of C5a and C5aR1 has been shown to result in an improved sepsis outcome [30], therapeutic targets of the complement system in human sepsis therapy are the focus of current research [66] and seem to be a promising approach.
Further investigation is needed to better understand the role of C5a in the innate immunity of preterm infants and to evaluate C5aR1 as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic target for this cohort.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Cohort

We performed a convenience sample single-center study at the Department of Pediatrics of the University Hospital Schleswig Holstein (UKSH), Campus Lübeck, recruiting preterm infants born between July 2019 and May 2020 and their mothers as part of our IRoN (Immunoregulation of the Newborn) study project at the UKSH Campus Lübeck. Preterm infants of a gestational age <32 + 0 weeks were included in their first three days of life. Exclusion criteria were lethal malformations and missing written consent. We also included term born infants and healthy adult donors as control groups.

4.2. Ethics

Informed written consent was obtained from all parents or legal representatives on behalf of the enrolled infants as well as from the adult donors.
The study parts were approved by the local committee on research in human subjects at the University of Lübeck (IRON AZ 15-304).
The blood withdrawal was performed only within a medically required blood withdrawal. Blood samples were obtained according to current guidelines of the European Medical Agency on the investigation of medicinal products in term and preterm infants, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use and Pediatric Committee (PDCO, 2009)

4.3. Flow Cytometry

EDTA whole blood samples (100 μL) were stored at room temperature and processed within 24 h of withdrawal. To distinguish between intra- and extracellular expression of C5aR1, we split the blood sample into two portions of 50 µL each, and stained one for extracellular/surface expression, while the other was fixed, permeabilized and stained for intracellular expression.
Plasma from 50 µL whole blood was removed via centrifugation and blood cells were stained using fluorochrome-labeled antibodies to characterize the different cell populations and the expression of the C5a-receptors. We used cell permeabilization and fixation reagents (Cell Staining Buffer, Fixation Buffer and Intracellular Staining Permeabilization Wash Buffer (10X), BioLegend®, San Diego, CA, USA) and the corresponding protocols for intracellular and extracellular staining [67,68].
To ensure cell viability after 24 h, we used a Viability Staining in a dilution 1:1000 (Fixable Viability Dye eFlour®780 conjugated, eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) showing over 95% viability.
Every sample was stained with surface antibodies specific for CD16 (Alexa Flour 700 anti-human CD16, BioLegend®, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:100), CD19 (PerCP anti-human CD19, BioLegend®, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:100), CD56 (PE/Cy7 anti-human CD56, BioLegend®, San Diego, CA, USA; 10:100), CD66b (FITC anti-human CD66b, BioLegend®®, San Diego, CA, USA; 1:100) and CD3 (Brilliant Violet 421 anti-human CD3, BioLegend®®, San Diego, CA, USA; 3:100).
For every sample, a 50 μL aliquot was stained each for extracellular and intracellular C5aRs (APC anti-human CD88 (C5aR), BioLegend®®, San Diego, CA, USA, 1:100, PE anti-human C5L2, BioLegend®, San Diego, CA, USA 1:100).
Flow Cytometric analysis was performed within 24 h with a BD LSR II cytometer. The data were analyzed using FACS Diva Software Version 8.01 (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) and Flow Jo™ version 10.7.1 (BD, Ashland, OR, USA).
The gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Figure S3. To calculate the compensation, we used compensation beads, and to determine the threshold values for gating and to identify the fluorescence spread, we used fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls.

4.4. Clinical Data

Gestational age (GA) was calculated via obstetric examination and early prenatal ultrasound from the attending obstetrician.
Suspected sepsis was diagnosed by the attending pediatrician, when the infant received five days of antibiotic treatment and showed at least two clinical signs of systemic inflammation such as body temperature >38 °C or <36.5 °C, tachycardia >200/min, increased frequency of bradycardia or apnea, hyperglycemia >140 mg/dL, base excess >−10 mmol/L, increasing oxygen need and one conspicuous laboratory parameter such as CRP >5 mg/L, number of thrombocytes <100/nL, immature/total neutrophil ratio >0.2, number of leucocytes <5/nL).
Blood-culture-confirmed sepsis was defined as sepsis with at least two clinical signs, one laboratory parameter and confirmation of causative agent in blood culture.
Early-onset sepsis (EOS) was defined as sepsis (suspected or blood culture confirmed) occurring in the first three days of life.
Amniotic infection syndrome (AIS) was defined as a perinatal maternal temperature over 38 °C with at least one additional elevated maternal inflammatory marker (CRP > 10 mg/L or a number of leucocytes >16,000/μL) without other explanation, premature rupture of membranes, fetal or maternal tachycardia or foul-smelling amniotic fluid.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Data Analysis Was Performed Using GraphPad Prism®®

After testing for normal distribution, an ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis test) followed by a multiple comparisons test was performed to analyze the differences between groups.
Data were expressed as scatter plots showing the median and interquartile ranges. For the analysis of correlations, a Spearman p test was used. A p level < 0.05 was considered significant (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).

5. Conclusions

Our study revealed an elevated expression of the complement receptor C5aR1 on preterm infants’ neutrophils and NK cells, specifically the CD56dim or negative subsets, compared to their mothers, term infants or adults.
Further investigations are needed to better understand the functional relevance of these observations and to correlate C5aR1 levels with patient-relevant outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241210321/s1.

Author Contributions

H.B., A.H., E.H., J.R., W.G., C.M.K. and C.H. conceived and designed the experiments; H.B. performed the experiments; A.H. and C.H. analyzed the data; H.B. and A.H. wrote the first draft of the manuscript; all authors helped to revise the article critically for important intellectual content and approved the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

HB was supported by grants from the IRTG 1911 (financed by the German Society of Research, DFG) and the University of Lübeck. AH was supported by a grant of the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF, financed by the German Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF). The patient recruitment was part of the IRoN study supported by DFG-HA64-5/1.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Lübeck (IRON AZ 15-304, 5 November 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all patients involved in the study or from their representative legal caregivers.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing will be made possible upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff members of the NICU for their assistance including the probands and the staff members of the Härtels Lab and the ISEF Lübeck including the CAnaCore Facility for their technical assistance and helpful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

GA: gestational age; BW: birth weight; SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome; CARS: compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome; ADCC: antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity; AIS: amniotic infection syndrome; EOS: early-onset sepsis; LOS: late-onset sepsis.

References

  1. Simonsen, K.A.; Anderson-Berry, A.L.; Delair, S.F.; Dele Davies, H. Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27, 21–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Greenberg, R.G.; Kandefer, S.; Do, B.T.; Smith, P.B.; Stoll, B.J.; Bell, E.; Carlo, W.A.; Laptook, A.R.; Sánchez, P.J.; Shankaran, S.; et al. Late-onset Sepsis in Extremely Premature Infants: 2000–2011. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2017, 36, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Humberg, A.; Härtel, C.; Rausch, T.K.; Stichtenoth, G.; Jung, P.; Wieg, C.; Kribs, A.; Von Der Wense, A.; Weller, U.; Höhn, T.; et al. Active perinatal care of preterm infants in the German Neonatal Network. Arch. Dis. Child.-Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019, 105, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Humberg, A.; Fortmann, I.; Siller, B.; Kopp, M.V.; Herting, E.; Gopel, W.; Hartel, C. German Neonatal Network; German Center for Lung Research and Priming Immunity at the beginning of life (PRIMAL) Consortium. Preterm birth and sustained inflammation: Consequences for the neonate. Semin. Immunopathol. 2020, 42, 451–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Eichberger, J.; Resch, E.; Resch, B. Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: The Role of Inflammatory Markers. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 840288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Olin, A.; Henckel, E.; Chen, Y.; Lakshmikanth, T.; Pou, C.; Mikes, J.; Gustafsson, A.; Bernhardsson, A.K.; Zhang, C.; Bohlin, K.; et al. Stereotypic Immune System Development in Newborn Children. Cell 2018, 174, 1277–1292.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Strunk, T.; Temming, P.; Gembruch, U.; Reiss, I.; Bucsky, P.; Schultz, C. Differential Maturation of the Innate Immune Response in Human Fetuses. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 56, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Källman, J.; Schollin, J.; Schalèn, C.; Erlandsson, A.; Kihlström, E. Impaired phagocytosis and opsonisation towards group B streptococci in preterm neonates. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998, 78, F46–F50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, J.C.; Khodadadi, H.; Malik, A.; Davidson, B.; da silva Lopes Salles, E.; Bhatia, J.; Hale, V.L.; Baban, B. Innate Immunity of Neonates and Infants. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Drossou, V.; Kanakoudi, F.; Tzimouli, V.; Sarafidis, K.; Taparkou, A.; Bougiouklis, D.; Petropoulou, T.; Kremenopoulos, G. Impact of Prematurity, Stress and Sepsis on the Neutrophil Respiratory Burst Activity of Neonates. Neonatology 1997, 72, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nupponen, I.; Turunen, R.; Nevalainen, T.; Peuravuori, H.; Pohjavuori, M.; Repo, H.; Andersson, S. ARTICLES Extracellular Release of Bactericidal/Permeability-Increasing Protein in Newborn Infants. Pediatr. Res. 2002, 51, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nussbaum, C.; Gloning, A.; Pruenster, M.; Frommhold, D.; Bierschenk, S.; Genzel-Boroviczény, O.; von Andrian, U.H.; Quackenbush, E.; Sperandio, M. Neutrophil and endothelial adhesive function during human fetal ontogeny. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013, 93, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Raymond, S.L.; Mathias, B.J.; Murphy, T.J.; Rincon, J.C.; López, M.C.; Ungaro, R.; Ellett, F.; Jorgensen, J.; Wynn, J.L.; Baker, H.V.; et al. Neutrophil chemotaxis and transcriptomics in term and preterm neonates. Transl. Res. 2017, 190, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sampah, M.E.S.; Hackam, D.J. Dysregulated Mucosal Immunity and Associated Pathogeneses in Preterm Neonates. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Luevano, M.; Daryouzeh, M.; Alnabhan, R.; Querol, S.; Khakoo, S.; Madrigal, A.; Saudemont, A. The unique profile of cord blood natural killer cells balances incomplete maturation and effective killing function upon activation. Hum. Immunol. 2012, 73, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Qazi, K.R.; Jensen, G.B.; Heiden, M.; Björkander, S.; Marchini, G.; Jenmalm, M.C.; Abrahamsson, T.; Sverremark-Ekström, E. Extreme prematurity and sepsis strongly influence frequencies and functional characteristics of circulating γδ T and natural killer cells. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2021, 10, e1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gaddy, J.; Broxmeyer, H.E. Cord Blood CD16 56 0 Cells with Low Lytic Activity Are Possible Precursors of Mature Natural Killer Cells. Cell. Immunol. 1997, 180, 132–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Björkström, N.K.; Ljunggren, H.-G.; Sandberg, J.K. CD56 negative NK cells: Origin, function, and role in chronic viral disease. Trends Immunol. 2010, 31, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Klos, A.; Tenner, A.J.; Johswich, K.-O.; Ager, R.R.; Reis, E.S.; Köhl, J. The role of the anaphylatoxins in health and disease. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 46, 2753–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Unnewehr, H.; Rittirsch, D.; Sarma, J.V.; Zetoune, F.; Flierl, M.A.; Perl, M.; Denk, S.; Weiss, M.; Schneider, M.E.; Monk, P.N.; et al. Changes and Regulation of the C5a Receptor on Neutrophils during Septic Shock in Humans. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 4215–4225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gressner, O.A.; Koch, A.; Sanson, E.; Trautwein, C.; Tacke, F. High C5a levels are associated with increased mortality in sepsis patients—No enhancing effect by actin-free Gc-globulin. Clin. Biochem. 2008, 41, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huber-Lang, M.; Sarma, V.J.; Lu, K.T.; McGuire, S.R.; Padgaonkar, V.A.; Guo, R.-F.; Younkin, E.M.; Kunkel, R.G.; Ding, J.; Erickson, R.; et al. Role of C5a in Multiorgan Failure During Sepsis. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 1193–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ward, P.A. The Harmful Role of C5a on Innate Immunity in Sepsis. J. Innate Immun. 2010, 2, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Merle, N.S.; Noé, R.; Halbwachs-Mecarelli, L.; Fremeaux-Bacchi, V.; Roumenina, L.T. Complement System Part II: Role in Immunity. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Cain, S.A.; Monk, P.N. The Orphan Receptor C5L2 Has High Affinity Binding Sites for Complement Fragments C5a and C5a des-Arg74. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 7165–7169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bamberg, C.E.; Mackay, C.R.; Lee, H.; Zahra, D.; Jackson, J.; Lim, Y.S.; Whitfeld, P.L.; Craig, S.; Corsini, E.; Lu, B.; et al. The C5a Receptor (C5aR) C5L2 Is a Modulator of C5aR-mediated Signal Transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 7633–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, T.; Garstka, M.A.; Li, K. The Controversial C5a Receptor C5aR2: Its Role in Health and Disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Karsten, C.M.; Wiese, A.V.; Mey, F.; Figge, J.; Woodruff, T.M.; Reuter, T.; Scurtu, O.; Kordowski, A.; Almeida, L.N.; Briukhovetska, D.; et al. Monitoring C5aR2 Expression Using a Floxed tdTomato-C5aR2 Knock-In Mouse. J. Immunol. 2017, 199, 3234–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Okinaga, S.; Slattery, D.; Humbles, A.; Zsengeller, Z.; Morteau, O.; Kinrade, M.B.; Brodbeck, R.M.; Krause, J.E.; Choe, H.-R.; Gerard, N.P.; et al. C5L2, a Nonsignaling C5A Binding Protein. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 9406–9415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rittirsch, D.; A Flierl, M.; A Nadeau, B.; E Day, D.; Huber-Lang, M.; Mackay, C.R.; Zetoune, F.S.; Gerard, N.P.; Cianflone, K.; Köhl, J.; et al. Functional roles for C5a receptors in sepsis. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. McGreal, E.P.; Hearne, K.; Spiller, O.B. Off to a slow start: Under-development of the complement system in term newborns is more substantial following premature birth. Immunobiology 2012, 217, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Girardi, G.; Lingo, J.J.; Fleming, S.D.; Regal, J.F. Essential Role of Complement in Pregnancy: From Implantation to Parturition and Beyond. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ward, P.A. Role of C5 Activation Products in Sepsis. Sci. World J. 2010, 10, 2395–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Huber-Lang, M.S.; Younkin, E.M.; Sarma, J.V.; McGuire, S.R.; Lu, K.T.; Guo, R.F.; Padgaonkar, V.A.; Curnutte, J.T.; Erickson, R.; Ward, P.A. Complement-Induced Impairment of Innate Immunity During Sepsis. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 3223–3231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Morris, A.C.; Brittan, M.; Wilkinson, T.S.; McAuley, D.F.; Antonelli, J.; McCulloch, C.; Barr, L.C.; McDonald, N.A.; Dhaliwal, K.; Jones, R.O.; et al. C5a-mediated neutrophil dysfunction is RhoA-dependent and predicts infection in critically ill patients. Blood 2011, 117, 5178–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Solomkin, J.; Jenkins, M.K.; Nelson, R.D.; Chenoweth, D.; Simmons, R.L. Neutrophil dysfunction in sepsis. II. Evidence for the role of complement activation products in cellular deactivation. Surgery 1981, 90, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
  37. Braun, L.; Christophe, T.; Boulay, F. Phosphorylation of Key Serine Residues Is Required for Internalization of the Complement 5a (C5a) Anaphylatoxin Receptor via a β-Arrestin, Dynamin, and Clathrin-dependent Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 4277–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sacks, T.; Moldow, C.F.; Craddock, P.R.; Bowers, T.K.; Jacob, H.S. Oxygen radicals mediate endothelial cell damage by complement-stimulated granulocytes. An in vitro model of immune vascular damage. J. Clin. Investig. 1978, 61, 1161–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Mollnes, T.E.; Brekke, O.-L.; Fung, M.; Fure, H.; Christiansen, R.; Bergseth, G.; Videm, V.; Lappegård, K.T.; Koehl, J.; Lambris, J.D. Essential role of the C5a receptor in E coli-induced oxidative burst and phagocytosis revealed by a novel lepirudin-based human whole blood model of inflammation. Blood 2002, 100, 1869–1877. [Google Scholar]
  40. Karsten, C.M.; Pandey, M.K.; Figge, J.; Kilchenstein, R.; Taylor, P.R.; Rosas, M.; McDonald, J.U.; Orr, S.J.; Berger, M.; Petzold, D.; et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of IgG1 mediated by Fc galactosylation and association of FcγRIIB and dectin-1. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1401–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Riedemann, N.C.; Guo, R.-F.; Ward, P.A. A key role of C5a/C5aR activation for the development of sepsis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003, 74, 966–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xu, R.; Lin, F.; Bao, C.; Huang, H.; Ji, C.; Wang, S.; Jin, L.; Sun, L.; Li, K.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Complement 5a receptor-mediated neutrophil dysfunction is associated with a poor outcome in sepsis. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2016, 13, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Muenstermann, M.; Strobel, L.; Klos, A.; Wetsel, R.A.; Woodruff, T.M.; Köhl, J.; Johswich, K.O. Distinct roles of the anaphylatoxin receptors C3aR, C5aR1 and C5aR2 in experimental meningococcal infections. Virulence 2019, 10, 677–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Huber-Lang, M.; Sarma, J.V.; Rittirsch, D.; Schreiber, H.; Weiss, M.; Flierl, M.; Younkin, E.; Schneider, M.; Suger-Wiedeck, H.; Gebhard, F.; et al. Changes in the Novel Orphan, C5a Receptor (C5L2), during Experimental Sepsis and Sepsis in Humans. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 1104–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Pataky, R.; Howie, F.A.; Girardi, G.; Boardman, J.P. Complement C5a is present in CSF of human newborns and is elevated in association with preterm birth. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2017, 30, 2413–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schultz, C.; Temming, P.; Bucsky, P.; Göpel, W.; Strunk, T.; Härtel, C. Immature anti-inflammatory response in neonates. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004, 135, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Morris, A.C.; Kefala, K.; Wilkinson, T.S.; Dhaliwal, K.; Farrell, L.; Walsh, T.; Mackenzie, S.J.; Reid, H.; Davidson, D.J.; Haslett, C.; et al. C5a Mediates Peripheral Blood Neutrophil Dysfunction in Critically Ill Patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 180, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Melvan, J.N.; Bagby, G.J.; Welsh, D.A.; Nelson, S.; Zhang, P. Neonatal Sepsis and Neutrophil Insufficiencies. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 29, 315–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Peterson, L.S.; Hedou, J.; Ganio, E.A.; Stelzer, I.A.; Feyaerts, D.; Harbert, E.; Adusumelli, Y.; Ando, K.; Tsai, E.S.; Tsai, A.S.; et al. Single-Cell Analysis of the Neonatal Immune System Across the Gestational Age Continuum. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 714090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Faix, J.D. Biomarkers of sepsis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2013, 50, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Fusakio, M.E.; Mohammed, J.P.; Laumonnier, Y.; Hoebe, K.; Köhl, J.; Mattner, J. C5a Regulates NKT and NK Cell Functions in Sepsis. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 5805–5812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Karsten, C.M.; Laumonnier, Y.; Eurich, B.; Ender, F.; Bröker, K.; Roy, S.; Czabanska, A.; Vollbrandt, T.; Figge, J.; Köhl, J. Monitoring and Cell-Specific Deletion of C5aR1 Using a Novel Floxed GFP-C5aR1 Reporter Knock-in Mouse. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 1841–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Min, X.; Liu, C.; Wei, Y.; Wang, N.; Yuan, G.; Liu, D.; Li, Z.; Zhou, W.; Li, K. Expression and regulation of complement receptors by human natural killer cells. Immunobiology 2014, 219, 671–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Cooper, M.; Fehniger, T.A.; Caligiuri, M. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol. 2001, 22, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bochennek, K.; Fryns, E.; Wittekindt, B.; Buxmann, H.; Quaiser, A.; Fischer, D.; Klingebiel, T.; Koehl, U.; Schloesser, R.; Huenecke, S. Immune cell subsets at birth may help to predict risk of late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Early Hum. Dev. 2016, 93, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Anderson, J.; Thang, C.M.; Thanh, L.Q.; Dai, V.T.T.; Phan, V.T.; Nhu, B.T.H.; Trang, D.N.X.; Trinh, P.T.P.; Nguyen, T.V.; Toan, N.T.; et al. Immune Profiling of Cord Blood From Preterm and Term Infants Reveals Distinct Differences in Pro-Inflammatory Responses. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 777927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Orange, J.S.; Ballas, Z.K. Natural killer cells in human health and disease. Clin. Immunol. 2006, 118, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fauriat, C.; Long, E.O.; Ljunggren, H.-G.; Bryceson, Y.T. Regulation of human NK-cell cytokine and chemokine production by target cell recognition. Blood 2010, 115, 2167–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Guilmot, A.; Hermann, E.; Braud, V.M.; Carlier, Y.; Truyens, C. Natural Killer Cell Responses to Infections in Early Life. J. Innate Immun. 2011, 3, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Poli, A.; Michel, T.; Thérésine, M.; Andrès, E.; Hentges, F.; Zimmer, J. CD56brightnatural killer (NK) cells: An important NK cell subset. Immunology 2009, 126, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lusyati, S.; Hulzebos, C.V.; Zandvoort, J.; Sauer, P.J. Levels of 25 cytokines in the first seven days of life in newborn infants. BMC Res. Notes 2013, 6, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Furebring, M.; Håkansson, L.D.; Venge, P.; Nilsson, B.; Sjölin, J. Expression of the C5a receptor (CD88) on granulocytes and monocytes in patients with severe sepsis. Crit. Care 2002, 6, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Soto, E.; Romero, R.; Richani, K.; Yoon, B.H.; Chaiworapongsa, T.; Vaisbuch, E.; Mittal, P.; Erez, O.; Gotsch, F.; Mazor, M.; et al. Evidence for complement activation in the amniotic fluid of women with spontaneous preterm labor and intra-amniotic infection. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2009, 22, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Viemann, D. S100-Alarmins Are Essential Pilots of Postnatal Innate Immune Adaptation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ulas, T.; Pirr, S.; Fehlhaber, B.; Bickes, M.S.; Loof, T.G.; Vogl, T.; Mellinger, L.; Heinemann, A.S.; Burgmann, J.; Schöning, J.; et al. S100-alarmin-induced innate immune programming protects newborn infants from sepsis. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 622–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Garred, P.; Tenner, A.J.; Mollnes, T.E. Therapeutic Targeting of the Complement System: From Rare Diseases to Pandemics. Pharmacol. Rev. 2021, 73, 792–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Biolegend.com. Available online: https://www.biolegend.com/en-us/protocols/cell-surface-flow-cytometry-staining-protocol (accessed on 29 September 2022).
  68. Biolegend.com. Available online: https://www.biolegend.com/en-us/protocols/intracellular-flow-cytometry-staining-protocol (accessed on 29 September 2022).
Figure 1. Intracellular expression of C5aR1 in neutrophils from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants assessed by flow cytometry: (a) frequencies of C5aR1-positive neutrophils; (b) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of intracellular C5aR1 in neutrophils. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Figure 1. Intracellular expression of C5aR1 in neutrophils from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants assessed by flow cytometry: (a) frequencies of C5aR1-positive neutrophils; (b) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of intracellular C5aR1 in neutrophils. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey’s multiple comparisons, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Ijms 24 10321 g001
Figure 2. Expression of C5aR1 on NK cells from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants: (a) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of extracellular C5aR1 on NK cells; (b) MFI of intracellular C5aR1 on NK cells. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey´s multiple comparisons, * = p < 005, ** = p < 0.01, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Figure 2. Expression of C5aR1 on NK cells from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants: (a) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of extracellular C5aR1 on NK cells; (b) MFI of intracellular C5aR1 on NK cells. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey´s multiple comparisons, * = p < 005, ** = p < 0.01, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Ijms 24 10321 g002
Figure 3. Expression of C5aR1 on the different subsets of NK cells from adults, mothers, term and preterm infant: (a) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of extracellular C5aR1 on NK cells; (b) MFI of intracellular C5aR1 on NK cells. Bars indicate median and minimum/maximum of C5aR1 expression to visualize differences between the subsets.
Figure 3. Expression of C5aR1 on the different subsets of NK cells from adults, mothers, term and preterm infant: (a) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of extracellular C5aR1 on NK cells; (b) MFI of intracellular C5aR1 on NK cells. Bars indicate median and minimum/maximum of C5aR1 expression to visualize differences between the subsets.
Ijms 24 10321 g003
Figure 4. Extracellular expression of C5aR1 on NK cells from preterm infants with or without perinatal infection: mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of extracellular C5aR1 on NK cells. Mann–Whitney test, ** = p < 0.01, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Figure 4. Extracellular expression of C5aR1 on NK cells from preterm infants with or without perinatal infection: mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of extracellular C5aR1 on NK cells. Mann–Whitney test, ** = p < 0.01, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Ijms 24 10321 g004
Figure 5. Intracellular expression of C5aR2 in neutrophils from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants assessed by flow cytometry: (a) frequencies of C5aR1-positive neutrophils; (b) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of intracellular C5aR1 in neutrophils. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey´s multiple comparisons, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Figure 5. Intracellular expression of C5aR2 in neutrophils from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants assessed by flow cytometry: (a) frequencies of C5aR1-positive neutrophils; (b) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of intracellular C5aR1 in neutrophils. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey´s multiple comparisons, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Ijms 24 10321 g005
Figure 6. Intracellular Expression of C5aR2 in NK cells from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants assessed by flow cytometry: (a) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of C5aR2-positive CD56bright CD16+ NK cells intracellularly; (b) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of C5aR2-positive CD56bright CD16- NK cells intracellularly. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey´s multiple comparisons, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Figure 6. Intracellular Expression of C5aR2 in NK cells from adults, mothers, term and preterm infants assessed by flow cytometry: (a) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of C5aR2-positive CD56bright CD16+ NK cells intracellularly; (b) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of C5aR2-positive CD56bright CD16- NK cells intracellularly. Kruskal–Wallis test, Tukey´s multiple comparisons, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, **** = p < 0.0001, bars indicate median and interquartile range.
Ijms 24 10321 g006
Table 1. Characterization of cohorts.
Table 1. Characterization of cohorts.
Preterm infants (n)32
Gestational age, weeks of gestation (mean/median/SD)29.5/29.9/2.69
Birth weight, g (mean/median/SD)1331.6/1300.0/464.13
Gender male (n/%)14/43.8
Multiples (n/%)10/31.3
AIS (n/%)8/25.0
EOS (n/%)1/3.1
Mothers (n)25
Age, years (mean/median/SD)29.0/29.0/6.09
Delivery at gestational age, weeks of gestation (mean/median/SD)29.7/29.9/2.68
AIS yes (n/%)6/24.0
Term infants (n)11
Sex, male (n/%)4/36.4
Adults (n)14
Sex, male (n/%)6/42.9
Age, years (mean/median/SD)28.2/25.0/5.96
Legend: AIS—amniotic infection syndrome; EOS—early-onset sepsis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boeckel, H.; Karsten, C.M.; Göpel, W.; Herting, E.; Rupp, J.; Härtel, C.; Hartz, A. Increased Expression of Anaphylatoxin C5a-Receptor-1 in Neutrophils and Natural Killer Cells of Preterm Infants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210321

AMA Style

Boeckel H, Karsten CM, Göpel W, Herting E, Rupp J, Härtel C, Hartz A. Increased Expression of Anaphylatoxin C5a-Receptor-1 in Neutrophils and Natural Killer Cells of Preterm Infants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(12):10321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210321

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boeckel, Hannah, Christian M. Karsten, Wolfgang Göpel, Egbert Herting, Jan Rupp, Christoph Härtel, and Annika Hartz. 2023. "Increased Expression of Anaphylatoxin C5a-Receptor-1 in Neutrophils and Natural Killer Cells of Preterm Infants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 12: 10321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210321

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop